Item 6ACase No.
ZA15-149
S T A F F R E P O R T
February 28, 2017
CASE NO: ZA15-149
PROJECT: Specific Use Permit for Zone Systems, Inc. – Verizon Wireless EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Zone Systems, Inc., on behalf of Verizon Wireless is requesting approval of a
Specific Use Permit for Telecommunications Towers, Antennas, or Ancillary
Structures on property described as Tracts 1F and 1G, Richard Eads Survey,
Abstract No. 481 and Lots 11A and 11B, Oaks Addition, Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas; located at 1335 & 1361 E. Highland Street and 1009 N. Carroll
Avenue, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "CS" Community Service District
and "AG" Agricultural District. SPIN Neighborhood # 3.
DETAILS: The project is located on the southeast corner of the sport’s field on the Carroll
ISD property at the southeast corner of N. Carroll Ave. and E. Highland St. The
purpose of the proposed specific use permit is to allow the erection of a
telecommunications monopole that is designed to replace an existing sport’s
field lighting pole. The existing light pole is located approximately 10 feet from
the property line to the south. The plan proposes an underground PVC conduit
that will route the coax cables to an equipment compound which is proposed to
be located approximately 175 feet east and 24 feet north of the proposed
monopole location. The equipment compound is approximately 630 square feet;
the compound will be enclosed by a solid masonry wall that will match the color
and brick of the existing buildings. The applicant is proposing a shade canopy
structure over the equipment compound that is approximately 9 feet 2 inches in
height. The applicant has stated that the screening wall can be built at 10 feet in
height in order to screen the view of the shade structure. The requirement for
screening around the equipment compound is 8 feet.
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning CS and AG
Land Use Designation Office Commercial, Mixed Use and
Retail Commercial
Height of Existing Light Pole 72 ft
Height of Proposed Monopole 95 ½ ft
Equipment Compound 630 sq ft
Total Lease Area 805 sq ft
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA15-149
P&Z Commission Recommendation Applicant’s Response
The P&Z recommended the applicant present
City Council with an optional structure showing
expanded capacity to house additional canisters
in providing co-location.
The applicant has stated that due to the nature of the
monopole structure and that the monopole will also
serve as a light standard, the only way to accommodate
and additional carrier is to add height to the monopole.
The applicant has stated he will provide a rendering at
the City Council meeting that will show the additional 10
feet in height to the proposed structure for their
consideration.
VARIANCES
REQUESTED: The following variances have been requested in relation to the proposed
specific use permit:
Variance to landscaping requirement under Zoning Ordinance No.
480, Section 45.7.d.8: The monopole tower is proposed to replace an
existing light standard that is located approximately 10 feet from the
southern property line which currently abuts residential property. The
proposed equipment compound is located on the adjacent lot to the east
that abuts a commercial lot to the south that has a significant existing
tree buffer along the common property line. A landscape buffer of plant
materials is required around tower facilities and any equipment
buildings. Due to the proposed configuration, the existing conditions of
the site and surrounding properties, the applicant is requesting relief
from landscaping requirements.
Variance to parking requirement under Zoning Ordinance No. 480,
Section 45.7.d.10.d: One (1) all weather surface parking space shall be
provided on each site. The applicant is proposing an access easement
that utilizes an existing driveway off E. Highland St. and continues down
through the sports field area to the lease area. The applicant is
requesting to keep the current condition of the site as much as possible
and states the occasional access to the site will not require a separate
parking space from the existing parking.
Variance to co-location requirement under Zoning Ordinance No.
480, Section 45.7.d.2.b: The proposed tower facility does not allow for
additional providers due to the limited space available on the pole which
also serves as a sports field light standard.
Variance to setback requirement under Zoning Ordinance No. 480,
Section 45.7.d.7.a, c:
o Towers shall be a minimum of 200 feet or 2:1 distance to height
ratio, whichever is greater, from the property line of properties
used for residential purposes.
The proposed location of the monopole is approximately
10 feet from the property line directly to the south and
approximately 100 feet from the property line south of the
first line.
o Towers shall be located in such a manner that if the structure
should fall along its longest dimension, it will remain within
Case No.
ZA15-149
property boundaries and avoid habitable structures, public
streets, utility lines and other telecommunication towers.
The monopole is approximately 95 ½ feet in height. If the
monopole should fall, it would not remain within the
subject property boundary, however, the nearest
habitable structure is approximately 108 feet away.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing
2) Consider Approval of the Specific Use Permit
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Specific Use Permit Review Summary No. # 3, dated February 14,
2017
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Resolution No. 17-009
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative
Link to Plans
Link to SPIN Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Lorrie Fletcher (817) 748-8069
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-149 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Carroll ISD
APPLICANT: Zone Systems, Inc. / Verizon Wireless
PROPERTY SITUATION: The subject property is located at 1335 & 1361 E. Highland Street and
1009 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1F and 1G, Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481 and Lots 11A
and 11B, Oaks Addition, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial, Mixed Use and Retail Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: “AG” – Agricultural District and “CS” – Community Service District
HISTORY: Carroll Independent School District currently owns eleven (11) unplatted
tracts and a platted lot divided into two (2) tracts by appraisal district
records at the general subject location. City development records date
back to 1984 when Carroll Intermediate School began evolving at this
site.
Limited recorded activity was available on the subject properties directly
related to the Specific Use Permit for this case, however, records were
found involving an Arts & Crafts store on Lot 11, Oaks Addition in 1987
(structure has been removed) and some Earth Disturbance and Tree
permits during 2007. The following items were also recorded:
In 2002, the sports field lighting was permitted and installed for the
purpose of Lacrosse.
By 2007, Carroll Intermediate School had re-located and a portion of the
buildings were occupied by CISD Administration as well as Southlake
DPS temporarily.
In 2012, Gateway Church and the King’s University occupied a portion
of the buildings.
And in 2013, Southlake Baptist Church moved onto the site and
occupied a portion of the buildings and is currently leasing buildings on
this site today.
Other CISD locations with approved Specific Use Permits
regarding telecommunication structures:
* A Specific Use Permit was approved by City Council on May 17, 2005
to allow a new telecommunications tower of a flag pole structure type to
include equipment compound at the Carroll Senior High School property
located on FM 1709 and Peytonville. In 2006, a Specific Use Permit was
approved by City Council which allowed additional equipment cabinets
and antennas on the existing pole. (See Planning Case ZA06-084)
* A Specific Use Permit was approved by City Council on September 6,
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-149 Page 2
2016 at the CISD property located on N. Carroll and E. Dove to allow a
95 foot sports field lighting pole to be replaced by a 115 foot monopole
and a 1,080 square foot equipment compound. Variances were
approved regarding relief from landscaping and co-location
requirements. (See Planning Case ZA15-148)
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The Southlake 2030 Consolidated Future Land Use Plan designates the
subject property as Office Commercial, Mixed Use and Retail
Commercial. The Future Land Use Plan defines Office Commercial as a
commercial category designed and intended for the exclusive use of
office and limited office-related activities. It is established for and will be
allocated to those districts best suited for supporting commercial activity
of an office character. It has been
established to encourage and
permit general professional and
business offices of high quality
and appearance, in attractive
landscaped surroundings with
the types of uses and design
exterior appearance so controlled
as to be generally compatible
with existing and future adjacent
and surrounding residential
development. Properties with this
designation may serve as a
transition between established residential neighborhoods, major
roadways, and retail development.
The range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the
varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category
necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development.
New development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing
development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design
and transition between different uses. Typically, the Mixed Use
designation is intended for medium- to higher-intensity office buildings,
hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and residential uses.
Nuisance-free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses
that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be compatible
with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the
Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density Residential,
Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and Office Commercial
categories.
The Retail Commercial category is a lower- to medium-intensity
commercial category providing for neighborhood-type retail shopping
facilities and general commercial support activities. It is intended to
provide limited local retail and/or office uses which serve neighborhoods
in close proximity. It is intended that all uses in this category will be
compatible with adjacent single family uses, thereby maintaining the
character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. This category is
intended to encourage comprehensively planned developments. In
areas where the Retail Commercial designation is adjacent to
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-149 Page 3
residentially zoned properties or areas with a residential designation on
the Land Use Plan, lower intensity activities such as office or office-
related uses should be planned adjacent to the residential uses. Other
suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space,
Public/Semi-Public, and Office Commercial categories.
Mobility Master Plan
The subject property can be accessed by East Highland Street which is
described as an 88 foot 4-lane divided arterial roadway. The proposed
compound will be accessed from an internal 15 foot access easement
as shown on the submitted site plan.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed specific use permit does not affect any existing roadway
conditions.
TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed specific use permit does not affect any existing trees.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held for this project August 23, 2016.
Link to SPIN Report
PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION: February 23, 2017; Approved (6-0) subject to the Staff Report dated
February 17, 2017 and Specific Use Permit Review Summary No. 3
dated February 14, 2017; granting the variances requested and noting
the applicant’s willingness to present City Council with an optional
structure showing expanded capacity to house additional canisters in
providing co-location; also, noting the applicant’s willingness to provide
a 10 foot screening wall around the equipment compound.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Review Summary No. # 3, dated February 14, 2017.
Variance Criteria -At the time of review of any required Concept Plan,
the City Council may grant variances to the development standards set
forth in Section 45.
a) To receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate the following:
i) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on surrounding
residential properties;
ii) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the architectural
design or creativity of the project; or
iii) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with surrounding
developed properties.
b) In order to grant a variance, the City Council must determine that a
literal enforcement of the regulations will create an unnecessary
hardship or a practical difficulty for the applicant; that the situation
causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to
the affected property and is not self -imposed; that the variance will
not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted
development of adjacent properties; and that the granting of the
variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this
ordinance.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-149 Page 4
c) If a variance application is denied by the City Council, no other
variance of like kind relating to the same project or proposed project
shall be considered or acted upon by the City Council for a period of
six (6) months subsequent to the denial.
Approval Criteria for Specific Use Permits - In granting or denying an
application for a specific use permit, the City Council shall take into
consideration the following factors:
a. Safety of the motoring public and of pedestrians using the
facility and the area immediately surrounding the site.
b. Safety from fire hazard, and measures for fire control.
c. Protection of adjacent property from flood or water damage.
d. Noise producing elements; and glare of vehicular and
stationary lights and effect of such lights on established
character of the neighborhood.
e. Location, lighting and type of signs; and relation of signs to
traffic control and adverse effect on adjacent properties.
f. Street size and adequacy of pavement width for traffic and
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use
around the site and in the immediate neighborhood.
g. Adequacy of parking, as determined by requirements of this
chapter for off-street parking facilities for similar uses; location
of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading
spaces; and protection of the public health by all weather
surfacing on all parking areas to control dust.
h. Such other measures as will secure and protect the public
health, safety, morals and general welfare.
i. City Council may grant variances to specific regulations
associated with a specific use set forth in Sections 45. To
receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate one of the
following (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-MMMM):
(a) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on
surrounding residential properties; or
(b) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the
architectural design or creativity of the project; or
(c) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with
surrounding developed properties; or
(d) The proposed construction is an addition to an existing
project that does not meet the requirements of this
ordinance.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA15-149 Page 1
VICINITY MAP
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-149 Page 1
SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA15-149 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 02/14/17
Project Name: Specific Use Permit – 1101 N. Carroll Avenue
APPLICANT: Zone Systems, Inc. OWNER: Carroll ISD
Peter Kavanagh Matt Miller
1620 Handley Drive 2400 N. Carroll Avenue
Dallas, TX Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: 214-941-4440 Phone: 817-949-8210
Email: peterk@zonesystems.com Email:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/20/17 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SPECIFIC
USE PERMIT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER.
Planning Review
Lorrie Fletcher
Planner I
Phone: (817) 748-8069
Email:lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us
1. Provide proposed monopole exhibits that have been signed and sealed by appropriate
licensed professional(s). The applicant has indicated that professionally sealed plans will
be provided at permit stage.
2. Provide distance labels on the site plan to the nearest residential property line (towers shall be
a minimum of 200 feet or 2:1 distance to height ratio, whichever is greater) AND to the actual
nearest existing home. Towers shall be located in such a manner that if the structure should
fall along its longest dimension, it will remain within property boundaries and avoid habitable
structures, public streets, utility lines and other telecommunication towers. The applicant has
requested a variance to the setback requirement. The existing light pole is
approximately 10 feet from the residential property line to the south. The proposed
monopole will be located in the same place.
3. Provide a detailed landscape plan. The applicant has requested a variance to the
landscaping requirement.
4. Provide one (1) all weather surface parking space to serve the site. The applicant has
requested a variance to this requirement.
5. The proposed monopole facility does not provide for co-location for other carriers. The
applicant has requested a variance to this requirement.
6. Because the proposed location lies within a commercial flight path, provide documentation of
FAA approval for your proposed location. A document was provided for ZA15-148 but was
not included with this application.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-149 Page 2
Informational Comments:
* A SPIN meeting was held August 23, 2016.
* Each backhaul provider shall be identified and have all necessary franchises, permits, and
certificates. The identity of other providers who co-locate to the site and their backhaul
providers shall be provided as well.
* No lettering, symbols, images, or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of
vehicular traffic on any adjacent roadway shall be placed on, or affixed to, any part of a
telecommunications tower, platform, antenna or ancillary structure.
* All construction shall comply with all ordinances of the city not in conflict with Section 45.
* In addition to the usual application fees for rezoning or specific use permit requests, the
applicant shall reimburse the city the actual cost of professional services, provided by an
engineer or other professional that may be required to review the application and provide
expertise.
* If high voltage is necessary, signs shall be posted every 20' on any exterior fencing which
state, “Danger--High Voltage.” The operator shall also post “No Trespassing” signs.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall,
stone, rock or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be
considered a masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath
mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco
finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g.,
EIFS –exterior insulation and finish systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar
characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry material.
* Prior to permit approval and issuance, provide the city with a certificate of insurance, issued by
an insurance company licensed to do business in the state of Texas indicating that the
applicant carries comprehensive general liability insurance with limits of liability thereunder of
not less than: bodily injury: $500,000 for injury to any one person and $1,000,000 for all
injuries sustained by more than one person in any occurrence; property damage: $1,000,000
for damage as a result of any one accident. The applicant shall provide the city with a renewal
certificate within then (10) business days of each renewal. Any insurance required to be
provided by the applicant herein may be provided by a blanket insurance policy covering this
property and other locations occupied by the applicant, provided such blanket insurance policy
complies with all of the other requirements as to the type and amount of insurance required.
The applicant may also fulfill the requirements under this section through a program of self-
insurance, subject to approval by the city, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
If the applicant elects to self-insure, then the applicant shall furnish the city with a letter stating
that there is a self-insurance program in effect that provides for the same, or greater, coverage
than required of the applicant herein. The applicant agrees to furnish the city with certificate of
insurance certifying that the applicant has in force and affect the above specified insurance.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-149 Page 3
The certificate and renewal certificates shall provide that insurance shall not be canceled or
changed unless 30 days’ prior written notice is just given to the city.
* Variances -At the time of review of any required Concept Plan, the City Council may grant
variances to the development standards set forth in Section 45.
a) To receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate the following:
iv) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on surrounding residential
properties;
v) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the architectural design or
creativity of the project; or
vi) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with surrounding developed
properties.
b) In order to grant a variance, the City Council must determine that a literal enforcement
of the regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty for the
applicant; that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is
unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed; that the variance will not injure
and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent
properties; and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and
purpose of this ordinance.
c) If a variance application is denied by the City Council, no other variance of like kind
relating to the same project or proposed project shall be considered or acted upon by
the City Council for a period of six (6) months subsequent to the denial.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-149 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response
1. XARIS INVESTMENTS LTD C3 1050 E SH 114 2.11 NR
2. NEC CARROLL & 114 LTD PRTNSHP AG 1201 CASEY CT 0.32 NR
3. SCHULZ, EDWIN R AG 1213 CASEY CT 0.29 NR
4. NEC CARROLL & 114 LTD PRTNSHP AG 979 N CARROLL AVE 0.19 NR
5. SCHENK, JOEL SF1-A 1075 CASEY CT 0.38 NR
6. JOHNSON, DEBORAH BOHANNON ETAL AG 1033 CASEY CT 0.43 NR
7. COLLINS, TED SF1-A 997 CASEY CT 0.42 NR
8. CARROLL, ISD AG 1375 E HIGHLAND ST 0.70 NR
9. GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 1301 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.23 NR
10. GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 700 BLESSED WAY 82.01 NR
11. CARROLL, ISD AG 1349 E HIGHLAND ST 1.60 NR
12. CARROLL, ISD CS 1301 E HIGHLAND ST 1.80 NR
13. CARROLL, ISD CS 1.59 NR
14. CARROLL, ISD CS 1101 N CARROLL AVE 4.63 NR
15. CARROLL, ISD AG 1009 N CARROLL AVE 0.43 NR
16. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 0.13 NR
17. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1371 E HIGHLAND ST 0.26 NR
18. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 0.26 NR
19. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 0.15 NR
20. CARROLL ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH CS 1280 E HIGHLAND ST 7.19 NR
21. D'SOUZA, ADAM SF1-A 1200 BLYTHE LN 0.92 NR
22. CARROLL ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH CS 1282 E HIGHLAND ST 1.03 NR
23. MEDICA HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC SP1 1110 N CARROLL AVE 0.70 NR
24. CARROLL, ISD CS 0.73 NR
25. CARROLL, ISD CS 1301 E HIGHLAND ST 0.32 NR
26. CARROLL, ISD AG 1379 E HIGHLAND ST 0.77 NR
27. GATEWAY CHURCH SP1 1200 E SH 114 6.78 NR
28. CARROLL, ISD CS 1335 E HIGHLAND ST 3.92 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-149 Page 2
29. CARROLL, ISD AG 1361 E HIGHLAND ST 1.04 NR
30. CARROLL, ISD CS 0.76 NR
31. STEELE, CRYSTAL M EST AG 1212 CASEY CT 0.32 NR
32. CARROLL, ISD AG 0.64 NR
33. MOSS, RICHARD B SP1 1011 N CARROLL AVE 0.61 NR
34. NEC CARROLL/114 ADJACENT LAND C1 985 N CARROLL AVE 0.26 NR
Notices Sent: Eighteen (18)
Responses Received: None
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-149 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 17-009
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR
TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS, ANTENNAS, OR ANCILLARY
STRUCTURES LOCATED AT 1335 & 1361 E. HIGHLAND STREET
AND 1009 N. CARROLL AVENUE ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS
TRACTS 1F AND 1G, RICHARD EADS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 481
AND LOTS 11A AND 11B, OAKS ADDITION, SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT
COUNTY, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT “A”, AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for Telecommunications Towers, Antennas, or Ancillary
Structures has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property
zoned as “CS" Community Service District and "AG" Agricultural District; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45.7 of the City’s Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the
requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated
in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific
Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for Telecommunications Towers, Antennas, or Ancillary
Structures, on property within the City of Southlake, Texas, being located at 1335 & 1361 E. Highland
Street and 1009 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, and being described as Tracts 1F and 1G,
Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481 and Lots 11A and 11B, Oaks Addition, Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas; more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A”, and as depicted on the approved
Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B” and providing an effective date,
subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set
forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-149 Page 2
granting of this Specific Use Permit:
SECTION 2.
This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS ______ DAY OF MARCH, 2017.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
By: ___________________________________
Laura Hill, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Lori Payne, TRMC
City Secretary
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-149 Page 3
EXHIBIT A
Property within the City of Southlake, Texas and Carroll ISD property at the southeast corner of N.
Carroll Ave. and E. Highland St. and being described as Tracts 1F and 1G, Richard Eads Survey,
Abstract No. 481 and Lots 11A and 11B, Oaks Addition, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-149 Page 4
EXHIBIT B
Reserved for approved plans