Item 6BNib
REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA17-002 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 02/21/17
Project Name: Site Plan—Lot 5, Kimball Park Restaurant/Retail
APPLICANT: Paul Moss ARCHITECT: Terry Cunningham
KP Southlake JV, LLC Terry Cunningham Architects
8821 Davis Blvd. #220 3604 S. Cooper St. Suite 100
Keller, TX 76248 Arlington, TX 76015
Phone: (817)431-5626 Phone: (682) 667-0044
E-mail: paul@marinabayhomes.net E-mail: tenyc@trcarchitects.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
02/17/17 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. The Site Plan must comply with the underlying "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District zoning.
2. Place the City case number"ZA17-002"in the lower right corner of all plans for ease of reference.
3. The backs of the parapets that are visible from adjacent rights of way(S.H. 114 and N. Kimball Ave.)
must be the same color as the exterior façade material.
4. In addition to the gross floor area of the building and uses, show and label the maximum height,
number of stories, and the horizontal articulation dimensions on the north side of the building on the
Site Plan (Sheet SP1).
5. The maximum dead end fire lane length is 150', so show and label the extent of any dead end fire
lanes at 150' and delineate the fire lane from the non-fire lane driveways using hatching or light
shading.
6. Label the widths of the proposed and existing sidewalks on the site("Existing 4'concrete sidewalk"or
"Existing 5' concrete sidewalk") on the Site Plan (Sheet SP1).
7. The applicant has submitted a revised Site Plan showing a preferred option (Option A)with a trash
receptacle enclosure on Lot 5. Two parking spaces are proposed to be removed from the plan for the
dumpster location. The previously submitted plan showed no trash receptacle enclosures proposed
on Lot 5 and none were shown on the Concept Plan for Lots 4 and 5. The applicant is proposing an
Option B Site Plan with a trash receptacle enclosure on Lot 4 along with the fire lane shown on Lot 4
to be constructed with the development of Lot 5.A copy of an executed shared use and maintenance
agreement and a reciprocal parking and access agreement and will be required to allow the Option B
trash receptacle on Lot 4. The applicant has also provided an exhibit of the proposed dumpster
enclosure that meets the requirements of the Corridor Overlay District if the natural stone shown on
the exhibit is similar to the natural stone shown on the elevations. Please label the natural stone on
the dumpster enclosure as"Natural stone to match stone on principal building or similar."A minimum
8'wall with masonry materials similar to the principal structure and with solid metal gates is required.
Case No.
ZA17-002 Page 1
8. Please make the following changes to the elevations and renderings.
a. Horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.d
on all facades visible from E. State Hwy. 114 is required. It appears as though the south and
east elevations and the southernmost portion of the west elevation are visible from S.H. 114.
Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation
evaluation chart. A variance request letter has been submitted to allow the articulation as
shown.
b. Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.e requires exposed columns to be constructed of or clad in the
same masonry material as the principal structure. A variance request letter has been
submitted to allow brick columns with painted metal at the top.
c. The brick façade on the south and southeast elevations is darker than the other elevations.
Please use the same brick color on all elevations except for the portions of each façade that
are oblique and shown on other elevations.
9. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No.480, as amended. Please ensure that the parapet height
shown will adequately screen all rooftop mechanical equipment.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
• The proposed development complies with the Tree Conservation Plan that was approved with the
original "S-P-2"zoning for Kimball Park. There are no existing trees on the property and the existing
Red Oaks east of the property are proposed to remain.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. The parking landscape island on the inside north ends of the south parking spaces are less than 12'
in width. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12' back-to-back if curbed or 13'edge-to-
edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. The parking islands
match the islands shown on the approved Concept Plan. However, the original Concept Plan was
approved subject to the Concept Plan Review Summary that included a comment stating that all
parking lot islands must be a minimum of 12' for the entire length of the adjacent stall. A variance
request letter has been submitted to allow the parking islands as shown on the Site Plan and
approved Concept Plan.
• The Landscape Calculations and the proposed landscaping are correct.
• Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Case No.
ZA17-002 Page 2
Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must
include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially
reviews Part III,Section F, (1)(g), Maps.The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution
(especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project
manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during
mass grading and infrastructure,one map showing controls during vertical construction,and one map
showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include
timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be
submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet, if
applicable.
4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a
registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building
Inspections Department prior to construction.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
• Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
• Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
• Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be
found in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
EASEMENTS:
1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15'
minimum and located on one lot— not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
2. A drainage easement shall be required for the detention pond/s.
Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of
way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be
constructed to City standards.
WATER COMMENTS:
3. Minimum size for water lines is 8"
Case No.
ZA17-002 Page 3
4. Commercial and industrial developments require fire hydrant spacing of 300' maximum for non-
sprinkled buildings or 600' for sprinkled buildings.
* Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way.
* The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc.
* Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
* Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
5. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8". Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary
sewer system built to City standards.
6. Clearly label all public and private sanitary sewer lines.
7. Add a note: Private sanitary sewer services need a plumbing permit and must be inspected by
building inspections prior to burial.
* Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
* Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets.
* Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details
and general notes which are located on the City's website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-
construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on
the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Case No.
ZA17-002
Page 4
p
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter of
buildings on a "hose-lay" basis for sprinkled buildings. Fire apparatus access, needs to be an all-
weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus. (Minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Fire Lane must continue through the property to the
south and connect to a dedicated fire lane, or a dead end fire lane a maximum of 150' would be
required until the property to the south is developed)
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting for the Kimball Park development was held January 6, 2014.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan.A separate building permit is required prior
to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Please ensure
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones except as noted in the "S-P-2"zoning regulations.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan,
landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required
fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter
Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council motions from the original approval of the
Kimball Park"S-P-2" zoning on March 4, 2014 are included below for reference:
Previous Planning and Zoning Commission motion:
January 9, 2014; Tabled to the January 23, 2014 P&Z meeting.
January 23, 2014; Tabled to the February 6, 2014 P&Z meeting.
February 6, 2014;Approved (5-0)subject to Revised Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No.2
Case No.
ZA17-002 Page 5
and Staff Report dated January 31, 2014, approving the two variances requested: 1) The
driveways do not meet the minimum required stacking depth of 150'. Approximately 17.6' of
stacking depth is shown on the N. Kimball Ave. driveway and 34.2'of stacking depth is shown
on the S.H. 114 driveway and 2) Subdivision Ordinance No.483, Section 8 01(A), as amended,
requires that every lot front on a public or a private street. A variance is requested to allow the
lots to be configured as shown on the Concept Plan and noting the applicants willingness to
address the following' 1) the entrance to the hotel on the southeast corner of the hotel, 2) the
parking and landscaping on the east side of the hotel 3) the design and layout of the
retail/restaurant component around the circle with the potential for patio space on the southern
side of the building as well as the northern side, 4) clarify renderings of the hotel 5) refine the
renderings to more closely resemble the materials anticipated being used, 6)place the fountain
in the renderings and 7) add pedestrian access from the hotel to the green space on the
southeast portion of the lot.
Previous City Council motions:
February 18, 2014;Approved at 1st reading (6-1) subject to the following stipulations. approval
of requested variances—driveway stacking depth and Subdivision Ordinance regarding the
public and private street access that will be configured as shown on the concept plan, concept
plan review summary No. 3, dated February 11, 2014; understanding that applicant must come
forward before the second reading with the following matters to be appropriately detailed and
discussed (1) detailed entry feature on front southeast corner of the hotel, which may include
fountains, landscape islands and detailed renderings of such, (2) regarding Lot 6, a detailed
landscape plan showing how that can be incorporated with the federal requirements to not
disturb the floodway, (3) discussion of the property owners agreement and how that may work
regarding the project, (4)detailed floor plans, more specifically the first floor and within that floor
plan a detail of the outdoor public spaces and how those will be incorporated into the hotel, (5)
also regarding Lot 6, noting what can be manicured to the extent to provide for periodic
maintenance within the floodway in connection with Lot 6 landscape detail and provide detailed
plant material for entire project, and (6) detailed renderings for convention center from the
Kimball approach which would also include traffic circle
March 4, 2014; Approved at 2nd reading (6-1) pursuant to the following: revised concept plan
review summary No. 3,dated February 26,2014;approving requested variances—driveway and
minimum required stacking and Subdivision Ordinance 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended,
which requires every lot to be on a public or private street and as requested to allow the lots to
be configured as shown on the revised concept plan; also noting the requirements under this
motion are pursuant to: (1)the revised renderings that were presented to Council this evening;
(2)the Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions,and easements(CCR)as presented to Council in
the application this evening; (3)the revised landscape plan presented to Council;(4)the revised
permitted uses, as presented from Adams Engineering in their letter dated March 4, 2014,
noting that the drive-through service will only be allowed for Lot 4; (5)also noting the balance of
the concept plan for the buildings that are not included in this site plan approval that it is
Council's expectation there will be 100% masonry construction; (6) the permitted uses
represented from Adams Engineering that the food service hours of operations as noted in the
application that "they will close no later than 11:00 p.m." that it is Council's intention to have
wording that mentions that it will be "no earlier than 11:00 p.m.; (7) the office building in the
concept plan will be a four story construction and that additional parking will be presented on the
first level underneath the building, (8) and pursuant to the revised concept/site plan as
presented this evening.
The City Council motion from the approval of the Kimball Park Office building on March 1, 2016 is
included below for reference:
Case No.
ZA17-002 Page 6
March 1,2016;Approved at 2nd reading(7-0)subject to the staff report dated February 23,2016
and the Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated February 23, 2016 granting the
following variances: that is the driveways do not meet the minimum required stacking depth of
150', approximately 17.6' of stacking depth is shown on the N. Kimball Ave.driveway and 34.2'
of stacking depth is shown on the State Hwy. 114 driveway, also granting a variance to
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(a), as amended, which requires that every lot
front on a public or a private street, a variance is requested and approved to allow the lots to be
configured as shown on the Concept Plan, and noting that we are accepting the revised
Concept Plan and development regulations for the S-P-2 zoning dated February 23, 2016 and
under Attachment "D" of the staff report, and also accepting the revised Site Plan, Tree
Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan found under Attachment"D"of the staff report and lastly
accepting the revised office building and parking garage elevations and noting the required
parking will reduce by one from what was presented and will now be at 435.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No.
ZA17-002 Page 7