Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Item 6A Applicant's presentation
Site plan for modifications to Loading Dock #4 at 500 W. Dove Road, and request for variance to overlay requirements if necessary relative to: A) Corridor Overlay; and 6) Residential Adjacency. Applicant's Request r MAOII IRE PARTNERS-SOLANA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I ZONED: N -PUD MIXED USE 1 �� 4S,50 ACRES 3w CONVENT ST. COgqCtPOR,4TION VOLUME 14641, PAGE 232 ZONED: R-P140� 0 A.T.C.T. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1.46 ACRES VCSLUME 127$2, P E 11p D.R.T.C.T. M1-4 TR 9r 't �" � u�w�n ��� ` Nwunr ouni au�Ere riwu Z,*�` �,� wpnwoao erw. rRr % NwrA .w rmv e.n � ••f _� • 6e as � y41 �� 1, + CNIkT�U CivNP�O 1�YV 4�1 f a �rurc EISBYEM -. � F , 'i �' ' \ ' O ❑ �r� w�.-- � lu � �T� E:x �+swatt• � +1{ �rl 'j .' flE• 9GEENNO NYl1 • .. / i fvftyu. p"... }n �455±aL tt�=°M1� f VC 7' j Go RPORATION W ERVAWR Dock • ,_,, ��t ...,•, a ewers w N I u DENrwL �c,� E.m�wer RYEY Lei ST©Ck'f®N DRIVE `I II APP ED DEVELOPME T PLAN RIRK4VOOD HOLLOW + PHASE III 15 • ... iki --WESTIDOVE STREET- -1GiRtAB[E 9Y1OT1YR,"r—— _ A�HALT �e9LY LNe _ _� r WESTERAA SOUT4iUtlCE " I I ZONED:e! - MlI p USE M- ix izrzaa� 1995 2] lfi k Dock 4 cannot be relocated to the north end of the data center: there is a yard full of generators there and it would be dangerous to have tractor trailers maneuvering between the generators and mechanical equipment that is close to the building. The design engineer indicated there is no way to create an appropriately sized loading dock on that north end of the wing near all of the critical equipment which supports the data centers in that wing. =-- -Z .� 1v1ap L XD W1 NJ,, 7—o '27M I I I 4.02 PM r 1! 2017 i The proposal is to slightly widen the dock driveway and angle it closer to the building, flatten the dock driveway approximately three feet so it is level, replace the existing dock leveler with a hydraulic scissor lift, add stairs/handrail to match existing stairs to the new lower driveway, relocate the existing fire hydrant/bollards, replace two sets of double doors with rollup doors, add a small "Deliveries Only" directional sign, and add a canopy over the dock. Elevation showing proposed changes to Dock #4 Brick posts to match facade No change to top height of existing dock/handrail New Canopy New rollup doors to replace two sets of double swing doors. No change in the size of the door frame Scissor lift to replace New bottom set of stairs to match existing lift I I_ ®-'�� existing stairs ADDearance of Dock #4 before and after proposed modifications �ey �4 _- 'iti 1 IEIII IIIIIII IIIII IflI t11�111111�1 VI11111 Ifllia'-...' r �-� �, _ _. ._,-- -" o� e _ nnolnlllllllllllllll lllllll111uuu111 1��1111111111 `.. ��� I �I11111r lllif111111 G11916 II� 3 ` 1 `I 1' = I •� "�w..v...�r � it I � -- - wd, Proposed canopy posts have been modified to match brick facade Canopy material Centria SDP1 75 is proposed to be red to match the existing color scheme MAGUIRE PARTNERS- SOLANA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VOLUME 14641, PAGE 232 D.R.T.C.T. li BEGIN STANDARD 6"CURB f R OSEQ RE T�} END WALL. E [7j�AI+�T \ BEGIN 18" CURB B O \ R \ ' X P . LI P FO / E Sa EF L 0 idCiPA1R \ \ S P �\ PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME SPECIFICATIONS * MG 1 Magnolia grandiflora I Southern Magnolia 3"cal, 12' ht x 4` spr SHRUBS CODE OTY BOTANICAL NAME 1 COMMON NAME SPECIFICATIONS RM 38 Rhaphiolepis x `Mantic' ! Magestic Beauty Indian Hawthorn 6' ht, 3' spr, 4' a,c. Rendering presented to PEtZ on January 5, 2017 of proposed screening wall adjacent to loading driveway, and landscaping to screen the driveway entrance (variance required). PEtZ asked if the applicant would be willing to screen fully with walls, applicant .tf agreed to return with a screening wall plan and presented it at the - _ 4 a4 7 /9 / 17 PF+7 mAAtino i ' af e; " � V 4 I F-CFFPm WI NJ 705 3:43 PM 1/4/2017 Dual screening wall proposal approved by PEtZ is for a 10' masonry block wall with brick face on Kirkwood side to match main brick on front facade, with decorative concrete cap trim to match existing trim. V+ of column trim 10' from grade to top of wall trim, with a 3' foundation and concrete footing Match existinp- trim Match existing brick ------------ ------------------ ------------ ------------------ ------------ ------------------ ------------ ------------------ ----- ------- ------------------ Width and spacing of columns would be adjusted when construction drawings are prepared but this is the overall design, height, material and color. Wall would be similar in appearance to existing screening wall (except 10' instead of height shown) PROP. ELECTRIC LIFT REVISE LOAD I N G D OCK M m z m PROP- 1 O'SCREENING WALL ---7-,- — r I PROP- ELECTRIC LIFT RE\-qSE LOADING DOCK #4 &L L 24"FIRE LANE do 15'SANITARY SEINE UTILITY EASE 1ENT VOL.13218. P ?4', LOCATION OF SURVEY LINE 1300 CONVENT ST. CORPORATION ZONED: R-PUCE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL R.D. PRICE SUR\,,/EY ABSTRACT NO. 120 ` tMD',JiD arTlf zUEB OEN—n1L 1Ol T. - 14 1—EA NO = M. k R °. • 0 —"` = 4 FE-- 1l t t t a o �LLlkf k= Sz PW-= Ire •t F G . a4. at �`-t.,,a• # •' '.E ML ir n' -41 Al. .,E M-I? C =,,S --Y RES MW. AL 9WfF rtra..ar..rU� s _ � •�''I.' yl�� I �. _ ._- .::FE_ r ' I r � Y yam, Views of the dock/loading space from public ROW could be considered to range from Tyler, points on Kirkwood, Orchard Hill, Copperfield, Stockton and Dove. There are no "views of" the dock from other public ROW locations because the building blocks the "view of" the dock. Based on walking the area and existing heavy landscaping on site, realistically the "views of" the dock/loading space from the ROW are limited to the oval areas. Ki rkw d Dove %,Tyler im hard Hil me MW Stockton alh�=a. 1 1� o view of dock/loading space from Idlewild ourt until Stockton ROW due to existing houses Idlewild a P OWEkEfl BYE esm 0 r CRAPEMYRTLE 'Natchez' P. Wintercreeper Edge EXISTING r BERM CI � RED OAK u J -:/ LI rrpiSTACHE RAPEMYRTLE 'Natchez' P. Wintercreeper Edge 1111E nAK v HOLLY UKANtMY K I Lt 'dynamite' CEDAR ELM Asian Jasmine LIVE OAK Edge HOLLY Nellie' RED OAK EXISTING HOLLY e BERM 'Nellie' yv LOROPETALUM `Pixie' �1 PISTACHE LIVE OAK Dwarf / Yaupon DAYLILY `Stella' Dwarf Purple $age HOLLY 'Nellie' f� - I Nl: P Screening is required for loading dock including walkway with railing on both sides of the dock, and for "loading space" which city staff interprets as the full length of tractor trailer (but not necessarily full height of tractor trailer). Angle and elevation of driveway will change with the proposed modifications, so even if a tractor trailer was parked at the current loading driveway for photographs, it would not provide an accurate basis for determining screening. M Photos taken with 10' pole with red sign on top. Wall outlines are based on pole height to indicate approximate views with screening walls. MIN 1� r. _ ` it y�ryT +~ 'R. y _ Open "ends" of dock where truck backs in have been permitted elsewhere in Southlake without a 10' wall screening the view of the "open" end of the dock. This property (Park Village Development) is in Corridor Overlay and there is a full view of the dock and loading space from the public ROW. __ - _ _ Photo from Dove ROW south of Dock 4: No apparent view of dock/loading space due to distance (630+ feet from end of loading dock driveway), vegetation, building and parked vehicles. �".- s� 4T .• Y 71 ,1 . Photo from ROW Dove south of Kirkwood, no apparent view of dock/loading space* 14 14 IA 1, /00 A rl Photo from median of Kirkwood at Dove, no apparent view of dock/loading space,, Photo from NW corner of Dove/Kirkwood, no apparent view of dock/loading space,, r kE � Snu1d�,Tc� T (� + Street Yew-1Grg 2O13 a , tV No view of dock/loading space from Idlewild Court ROW due to existing houses and vegetation, until the corner at Stockton. Photo from E side of common lot along Kirkwood south of Stockton, no apparent view of dock/loading space. Note that this point on the fence line of the common lot is higher than the ROW along this part of Kirkwood so there no views of dock/loading area from the lower area along the ROW at this point either. Further north along Kirkwood common area lot, no view of dock/loading space (still south of Stockton). This point is higher than the ROW. Further north on Kirkwood, no view of dock/loading space (still south of Stockton). This point is higher than the ROW. t Next slide photo is from here -1 Note heavy screening due to existing vegetation on common lot, no views of the dock/loading area from Idlewild Court ROW to the east of these houses Kirkwood rt Point on corner of Stockton is the first place along - - Kirkwood north of Dove where there is a view of - - dock/loading space from ROW or common area lot. 77�- ............S,f%�r'Sf1,"'i� - _ _ r l � _ l f 1 Proposed wall starts 5.5 par ing spaces south of the tree island north of meeting sigrjj�ign is at second parking space south of the tree island). JW-11`464 pp J a - yY lk 4 r %TO - uI a a � - Aww- 4-, Z' -� � d�w - e'er c. W,:► WIL$- I•M.- '-t_`=. ir• " _ _ View of dock/loading space from viewpoin `` _=• i -s;- _ y„ Me at Stockton at Kirkwood, - - 10' pole is east of group meeting point sign, - a proposed wall would start south of that - point. Meeting Sign$ a " Wall starts on south end 5.5 g : parking spots from the tree island ray rk.=�'`� •Y . - OW-' ate, View from Loading driveway looking toward Stockton �`>� I�".es - - � '7' � v�:�,. �'"�1'��,r�✓� ia�i�i 'YEi� '�� <.,i:a` Q.L,�.•, A14 I Approximate location of ring road screening wall, extends on the north end to 6th parking space north of light pole. View of dock/loading space from NE intersection of Kirkwood and Stockton, no view of dock/loading space with 10' wall EL �. `6",�-..-xr. a�.iz'i '--.�, .. +�;.r.-w `:; -r -, :�m..#•�tZ : us' — .:t.-, i.. __ ••'�, wrs's' ..k-.e�1'-._ - -�a,- �'�gic':r�..-- _ - w� .•..,, ra. ' ,y.. �-. ., •A''i� .M . ... •`dk y e tot Ole 41 iiw.r r '3 31 ,}� r l;�- ,r^ati�• t� �. ° -!vk "•{• R .9,J t . .i �� "�� `�. ��"k,�h : •r ;�`ti: �V}�� � x, F r -�. ,,.. • �� "a' t J 'J�i` C d`Mk'r�nw%/e'� ,t .;7& ? � t y ,�` yr IA ,r, ''°rt'�'a £ - :., tt ,�:,,. .. - ¢ r. ,,Ian• i - k r�i�ipa i �l if f Y,e -. � � ��, k Xa��� � � .'l .ef ��r, :M F 1; r }4 'r�H's�a ,�,by� �i�,►c V-a y,�wa1 � �,zdrS?.- Q{ a>- �p �.. ' yy t '�lti - L A Yt{ i x-. V 3 .', , ]� �tp ? �r� .3. •�1 � .A .�.« 3+' Z �! ,m •lit#� ��''d6 ,.y�� � '�` yT {�y��p. �kY"iS �.a.\r7 - _ ., �'^+Pd' ,� e- Al •+ r� ..�nl• .," . +.:,.r• 9 �'`,'a New west (southbound) lane of Kirkwood, photos taken from existing tracks on west side of ROW shown on city interactive zoning map. f W-r till i IF 4 a b View from new west lane of Kirkwood at Verizon's driveway opposite Stockton. — r � l `;�.,.ir �A.ryr i 1_ „�' .�_R.", � _ 1 � •` f �. r `+� y g � p � =`.o,� � - �' ` � ' "--��--r �' - - '�`�`•. � �c ! � _. � 4_ Y j �s .arts � -a ' '�j' � � � � , '''`''�L � . �, Z. "`•t ,�►n?'4 `.' - Tom. ti , 1 i � f�l�: r4 . •7. `,f.' ..Aa �' L�1 .a AFii=. - _ •� **0 i i t orj4ifi View from new west lane Kirkwood across from 420 Stockton side yard and 421 Copperfield side yard -1: POW- �M'..'--'���-� View from new west lane Kirkwood west {` of 420 Stockton side yard and 421 Copperfield side yard �• l t., y ��.1 � MY .. ` -. 4 � - ` � {-'� - y v`� I'.� r �. w 7r ? �p:. �i Tzrla ti 'A, - i~ �,y _ • - •�- �' ice!^ �r '� fir. .. c1 _. __ . � I -'tip{ - � I ~ r r' •~ � e !� " � �J'C - � y '�' ,?% - �' � r , .r+ { ti • t ' . '` � � - � `ice • - � -. - _ i fi• '. f - "� _r r���J � 1i. � `� ! - ` _ _ I ,, r ,, J i - r - .. � ` _ 1 �,� � ``. ria "o._ �, _ +� -' � •, `'•. � '. _ _ _ ".ram: . ' ' - r •� t - - _ n - .•./ •' .alb(. {. �, P.,� .. a �~ ` ` - P � i / F r �'0r-/ - WP, � �_ � '♦ � � _�•r � 1fer �., B ��hV a"", .-i`�/" a 'v`- r , #�„ %- - 'wry .�»,•, 1:•.' .1 �F _ _ ^7... '�: .� �. d� �A. �` _ f I_�._�wi r,� % _•.. .I4 : -F i r. -Y . r � �'� ..: '_ d• ' f •' `� . ~ �il.• ...�.. . � � • RIM, f f awl e° ! 1 / L View from new west lane Kirkwood ^ opposite cut de sac at Copperfield a View from new west lane of Kirkwood between 422 Copperfield End of and 417 Orchard Hill wall ,e o 416 l- t A"'"''� !' 1 &**-, Ring road wall P 10' i Awning View from new west lane Kirkwood opposite 422 Copperfield side yard at end of proposed ring road screening wall (6 parking spots from light pole) _ Loading driveway screening wall connects to corner of east building wall north of dock .,ate � _ • _ • �Y '. rR .may '�' No "view of" dock from north end of ON property at new west lane of Kirkwood ` opposite Stockton due to heavy vegetation. y! � 4': r, ;.a tti�a `'� • .s�dM�3':� 4 !\i� • r r`.� kt F ; � .. \ �`� � ` � ^^' n y ;.. t� r r r_, w W View from Copperfield ROW, dock/loading area is more visible from common lot property line a fence; see residential adjacency photos from Copperfie[d tots. ar WN M.7 -4 7- pan "T "M MM If i4av-*' VI 6 t Eli A r p'y \ 1`A� 11 �I �•f phi ° r7% bf+�� LQj EBB{ N1 n YA ST- -- _ AM MEW AL No view of dock from along ROW on Orchard Hill east of the corner at Kirkwood due to the existing vegetation and structures on corner and the existing berm on west side of Kirkwood ROW. Berm ;. is to remain at about the same elevation and be planted with trees. 'F1 Closer to Kirkwood, Dock is slightly visible from ROW at Orchard Hill/Kirkwood, but is screened by existing tree near loading dock and existing ROW berm and would be screened by loading driveway screening wall. Berm is to remain and be landscaped with trees. a Awning 1 Berm and existing landscaping screens dock and most of loading space from ROW at Kirkwood/Orchard Hill. Awning is partially visible in photo. Google Maps X Interactive Maps I Sout X Interactive City Maps X ZONING - section 43 - X"r C Q I Q southlake.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewerfindex.htmI?id=3ddafd7070b84a589dOd29b4l2l8130b 416 wor42) id 3� jilllilill 4 Maw iwl ► 417 404 V Transportation 41 44.2 ll 41 ► FV] CIIwps of Engineem Property ... Environtnentat ... 212 ►R,/ 2-footCorytours --- ---- I�T ---- -- - ►F-] 10-footConiours ... Top of Berm in ROW is approximately 6'-.8' 490 higher than paved ROW ►R 100-Year Flood Plain 2' contour topo map - ----- - 216 ►W 5GG-Year Flood Plain 500 413 ►F-1 2016 Aerial Photography ... I- J 41T ------ 4D5 -3m- 4 1 03 412 42D at® 1'. F / I / I I X 409 304 71 4 49, STOCKTON SAVO IQ View from top of berm on Kirkwood south of Orchard Hill. Existing L landscaping to remain. 77, 1 i f i.� View from Tyler Street at A Kirkwood, no apparent view of dock/loading space from public ROW. View from Tyler Str Kirkwood, no appz view of dock/toai space. 01 500 W Clove Rd, Southlake, Texi X Q aShow search results for 500 W 6pve... E3 WULJ M Feet (US) Measurement Result 400.2 Feet (US) ;l { : 6) Residential Adjacency Standards: Loading and Service Areas: Loading and service areas shall be located at the side or rear of buildings. Where visible, a minimum 10 foot solid screening wall shall be required to screen views of loading docks and loading spaces intended for tractor/semi-trailer delivery. This 10 foot wall must screen the entire loading dock or space. Screening materials shall utilize similar masonry materials to the building's facades. The accommodation of adequate access for service delivery trucks may be evaluated to determine the extent of screening required. -- [T]he four hundred foot (400') distance shall be yr measured from the non -single family residential building and/or use to the property line of the single family residential property... City staff interprets the use to include the loading dock driveway, so measurements are from the end of the loading driveway. Visible - Capable of being seen at a height of six feet (6) while standing at the highest grade on the residential z -r- property line. C. ,y = �,'vo F, ii, C ,y 0 1e ... .,.., _ - =sri, HERE, 'in, INC—F'ENIENT P, lntermap 1,-.. - E .. U_=..; i yo.�, - 500 W Dove Rd. Southlake, Texi X Q Show search result for $DO W Drne._. s Feet{US} Measurement Result 400 Feet (US) Lots, portions of which are within 400' of the loading dock/loading driveway, include: 421 Orchard Hill (common lot between Kirkwood and private lots), 421 and 422 Copperfield and 420 Stockton 421 �d•I, f I . ---CFiLPARi7 4a.it_tir Lf7i i n} 22 Copperfield 21 Copperfield 20 Stockton City of Fort Worth, City of South Iake, Texas Parks & Wildlife, Ezri, HERE, Garmiin, INCREMENT P, Intermap, USGS, E E3 0 500 W Dove Rd- Southlake, Texi X Q Show search result, for 500 W Dove.. ,WIN FWW I F. t US) Measurement Result 405.3 Feet{usi k I sit Fa 0 A P 'tz: & L 413 Id i L .AAA, IL C.ty ofForrAorth C.ty eF Southlake, Texas Par' s & vi dl;fe, Esrm, HERE, Garmin, INCRENIENT P, Intermap, USGS, EPA, I-- DA I C ty ofSoutihlake E3 0 500 W Dove Rd, Southlake, Texi X Q Shore search results fc-r SOO W Dove.. M . I Feet (US) Measurement Result s 421 &4 r- T z as Cf ct ,E�oJo_ rtha,ir _ i �.. Texas a iPa.�r'&xr%1 _dlfe, Esr:, HERE, Garmin, iNCRaENIENT P, Inrte1ar�ma'P, USG1S�, EPA Cof Sout',lake ... .9 �a ire 0- ►E-/:l Transportation Parcels Corps of Engineers Prop" Environmental ►1-1 2-footConiours ►1,/] 10-footContours ►FVJ 100-Year Flood Plain ► R 500-Year Flood Plain ► 2016 Aersal Photography Elevation is 30' higher to the south, ... 10, contour ... topo M,4p W DOVE RD_ 2523 2465 416 0 201 40 #9 419 214 417 405 404 205 2455 208 402 2)9 418 410 L 422 212 W5 400 42) 216 KJ'k' Lirlek Park 413 ------- 417 400 IL 421 405 416 412 409 304 308 100 499 1 1 1 4� �_ ST KTON DR 400 ZI :I- 1a 0 0 J 425 M 04 0 — m 0 Visible - Capable of being seen at a heigh t of six feet (6) while standinp at the highest P rade on the n r, idential the r property line. Ori 290 0 • Mrs I so Itt J/T City I of Fort Worth, City of Southlake Texas Parks .y. Seee[Vew-hug2813 ,r 422 Copperfield Common arot 421 Orchard Hill Earth Divided Ki rkwood merges to undivided road north of Light pole and yellow bollards Copperfield ROW view 421 Copperfield L� G'a Dove Road, SomMake, Texas Keep Right Sign near Stockton 420 Stockton Stockton Bide imagery w Image capture: Aug 2013 0 2017 G—gle Terms Report a paobfen Transportation ... ►I -,/I Parcels ... ►�j Corps of Engineers Property ... -1�✓j Environmental ... , rV—I 2-footContours ► F-1 10-footContours Proposed ►[vjl TOO -Year Flood Plain ails l, F/—I 500Year Flood Plain • ►r—/I 2016 Aer al Photography A A 4 409 421 —50 if 'A '"Raw 1 71m, C cltort Viorth, C-ty ofSouthlake, Texa, z z Int., LISGS. EIA, USDAI Cj��ofSouinlake— View of south end of ring road screening wall from fence line at 420 Stockton highest grade. f ' y � P ' _ - i -` -..� � � �}_ ' _ 1 _ c+i � ? � _.yam ,• � _ � y- "��.,'�� yu t OPAP `�� . v ram,` �,. �� !i " �, '�� y �y~�� l�� � ,.'9�w �r " •� � �� hoto with cite taken om14 -_ `'► slightly south of this spot beside;; 420 Stocon at highest point L 1 LAW 1w 11,11W ��1-31 ' �X'j MOMME"'I Oft Approximation of ring road wall view from 4M high point of 420 Stockt 44 RNME Mn"—L 4 Photo was taken from this spot beside 421 Copperfield Zoomed photo from highest point of 421 Copperfield W Photo showing 10' pole on east side of ring road from 421 Copperfie[d high point W i Photo showing 10' loading driveway screening wall from 421 Copperfie[d high point M QF Photo taken from this spot beside 422 Copperfield View from high point of common lot 421 Stockton and high point of 422 Copperfield L_ -- View from common area property line at high point of 422 Copperfield and high point of common area lot 421 Stockton. Is also representational of closest view of loading dock from Copperfield cut de sac. L A q Photo was taken from here, lnorth side of Copperfield cut de. _ -Z . sac at the fence line of the common lot/422 Copperfield.„ A 410 - I IN - _ r Benefits of dock modifications and screening Perspective on proposed dock improvements and screening walls and information in support of a variance, if a variance is deemed necessary. Variances - At the time of review of any required Concept Plan or Site Plan, the City Council may grant variances to the development regulations set forth in this Section.... To receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: (a) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on surrounding residential properties; or (b) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the architectural design or creativity of the project; or (c) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with surrounding developed properties; or (d) The proposed construction is an addition to an existing project that does not meet the requirements of this ordinance.