Item 6A SPIN Report 10 SOUTHLAKFE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
SPIN Item Number: SPIN16-37
Project Name: Verizon Wireless Facility (Loading Area)
SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #1
Meeting Date: November 8, 2016
Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance: Seven (7)
Host: David Alexander, Community Engagement Committee
Applicant Presenting: Kathy Zibilich
City Staff Present: Jerod Potts, Assistant to the Director— Planning and Development
Services
Attached to the end of this report are the Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the November 8, 2016
SPIN Town Hall Forum
Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking
on "Learn More" under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date.
FORUM SUMMARY:
Property Situation:
• 500 W. Dove Rd.
Development Details:
• Amending loading dock #4
• The reason for the amendment is the current loading dock has a driveway on an
incline that needs leveled about three feet lower on the loading dock than it is
right now
• The problem that is created when the driveway is uneven is the truck is at an
angle instead of being flat; you are dragging a heavy load up hill to get it on the
dock
• The other major change is trading out swing doors that have a threshold for roll-
up doors without a threshold so when you have a heavy load you are not
dragging across a bumpy threshold
• Proposal includes widening the dock driveway and angling it closer to the
building
• Dock would be expanded to put in a scissor lift to replace current lift
• Other changes are adding stairs and handrail that match existing stairs and
handrail — the reason is because the driveway is now lower so the stairs have to
go three feet further down to get to them
• Because the angle of the driveway is changing there is a fire hydrant and three
bollards that will be relocated so they are back in the grass and not in the
d riveway
• Proposing to add a deliveries only sign
• Requesting a canopy over the loading area to keep cargo dry as it is being
unloaded
• Elevation of the loading dock will not change — will look the same as before at the
same height. However, because they are excavating the current driveway, they
need the extra set of stairs that will look like the existing stairs
• Scissor lift would normally be in the resting position
• Bridge plate can be any color, as with the concrete
• Retaining wall would be adjusted to accommodate the lower driveway in that
area
• Existing trees would all remain
• Was an issue over the summer with the irrigation system — trees in that zone did
not get the water they needed. Irrigation system has been rectified. Will watch
trees to make sure they come back in the spring. 11 trees were replaced, but
determination was made that certain trees would come back so they were not
replaced. Those trees will be replaced if they do not return
• Canopy material is proposed to be a dark red to match color scheme in the
loading area now — can be any color
Exhibits presented at SPIN:
Site Plan Amendment
for ii i i to
Loading D•
at 00 W. Dove viii
--� w
Location
on overall
■ i 7'T
_ M =
s �'L=
The proposal isto 0ghby widenthe d act d&vevmy and■ • a it closer ■ - bulding.
flatten the dock d+veway oppra&natetv three feet so I iY le�.replace the e)dsting
• 1+ Vi.acid sbh/hondral to match e)twg stah to
douNedoom w1h ro4updoors. •d• ■ mial"Delverjes i directional sign. • • ••■
Existing Dock =1�'
Hydraulic Scissor�
Lift to replace
current Lift
REVISE LOADING DOCK #4
New Dock
Area
Elevation showing proposed • • a
� ! � ;r�oa�annraseaaao.c�
Nd�Fttinget�to�? — .. --_� +II}f II II {IIII
h�Jgilf of cxxhng �... �^ IIl I IIIIIIIIIIIII IIII Illll I Ill I�
❑oc�c/hondrd �
• l�
at to rhe
l�osticip p#f � Mew bc*can+�e-of cairs m
Appearance of Dock #4 before and �
after proposed modifications
No mange to the landscaping.existing trees w+Aremoin.Fasting fire hydrants and
bo4ords would be relocated closer to the building.Stois a n handrai to be added ro
match existing stairs.Modify reta ining wal to depth of lowered drive%wy.
a.
Photo from 420 Stockton looking at
the dock (Stockton at Kirkwood)
JIM
r
From Sidewalk on Kirkwood N of Stockton
(zoom
T r
Photo from loading dock looking
towards Kirkwood
r!i .•r.C•!.. .. fes,
x'toe-,4�
Photo from orchard Hills at Kirkwood
looking at the dock
canopy material CenMa SDP 175 is proposed to
be dark red to match the existing color scheme
Basis of design for stationary dock lift is a Penta lift Quad Hydraulic
Scissor Lift-would look similar to this,but surrounded by dock on three
sides and with an adjustable lip.
r ` '
Questions?
QUESTIONS /CONCERNS:
• Does the current loading area contain an electric lift?
o Yes
• Is it similar as scissor lift you plan to install?
o Is not a scissor lift — proposed lift is hydraulic which makes no sound.
Motor is in the building
• What is the reason for going to a scissor lift?
o To keep the loading dock at the same level as the building. Driveway is
further down so the lift has to go higher
• Lift not for repair?
o Correct
• How much additional linear feet of railing do you plan on adding?
o Another set similar to what is there now. Approximately 50' — 100' linear
feet of additional railing
• How will the railing be attached?
o Same manner as it is now.
• Attached to the current structure?
o Some attached to current, some attached to proposed structure
• Proposing new structure to be added?
o Dock will be extended slightly
• Adding additional concrete over and above what you had on the previous site
plan? Do you know the additional linear dimensions and/or amount of cubic feet
of structure/concrete you will be adding?
o The dock is widened slightly on this edge by about 4 to 5 feet, that is the
additional concrete just along that edge
• What are your current loading hours at that dock?
o Make an average of 4 to 5 deliveries a week
• Will these changes cause an increase or decrease in the amount of loading trips
per week?
o There is no anticipated change
• With these changes in the elevation, will this allow different vehicles than
currently used to load or unload at that site?
o From discussions with Verizon — this will not change any loading currently
going on — vehicles or amount of vehicles
• What types of vehicles currently unload at that site?
o Not sure
• Can you detail more about the topography changes for the new site plan? How
many yards of dirt are planning to remove from the site to reduce the three feet,
how many yards will you be excavating?
o Can get those numbers
• If these new changes cause the elevation to be more or less horizontal, do you
anticipate that will shine lights into the neighborhood? If not, have you performed
any studies to verify that?
o Don't believe they have done any studies. Depending on where you are
standing you may be able to see some of the additional loading dock
• Pictures taken not taken from highest point of the neighborhood to determine
whether vehicle glare would hit the neighborhood?
o Don't know what the actual highest point of the neighborhood is — tried to
take representational pictures
• One of the concerns of the neighbors is the lights will be shining into the
neighbors' homes
o After the change the truck would be pointed less towards Kirkwood
• Is your plan increasing or decreasing the size of the loading door openings?
o No
• What are the visual external changes that will be experienced by Kirkwood
Hollow with regard to these site plan changes? Will this be larger than it currently
is?
o It varies where you are, what you would see. The main difference visually
would be the canopy, the height of the loading dock, more stairs
• In the visual, it seems there is a lot of overlap on that tree - concerned for
development of the tree?
o Would trim tree if necessary for the canopy
• Does this plan include any additional signage?
o Yes. The additional signage would be just the proposed deliveries only
sign. That is only if it is allowed under the City code. If not we would have
to go through whatever approval process there is for a sign.
• The additional structural area to this particular lot is the concrete, the canopy, the
railings...is that correct?
o They are adding a little more retaining wall, modifying the lift, and
changing the doors to rolling doors
• Does this site plan increase or decrease the originally approved property line
setbacks?
o No
• Do you know why the initial loading dock was put there was built on an angle?
Possibly to avoid the lighting into the neighbors?
o Don't know
• Concern is that this particular site plan change does change the character of the
development. It makes it larger, adds significantly new structures. It does
increase the gross floor area of the structures in the area of the lot
o I think the floor area is considered covered area. We are going through the
site plan amendment process.
• How is the canopy attached? Is it attached to the building? Is it attached to the
structure?
o It's on four posts. It appears to be free standing.
• Will this site plan increase the intensity of the use as it relates to deliveries, than
currently?
o No
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes;rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials,City staff,and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the November 8, 2016 SPIN Meeting
Blackboard connect.
This message has been sent! Here is a sum mmy of the delivery results_ Click hare to view
more information online_
Delivery Summary
Title SPIN Town Hall Forum -N vember 81 2416
Message Type Outreach
Site CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
Scheduled By Daniel Cortez
Send Time 1110712016 05:30 PM{CT}
Voice Completed 1110712016 06:15 PM{CT}
Text Completed 1110712016 45:32 PM{CT}
Email Completed 1110712016 05:31 PM{CT}
Selected Contacts 11744
Successfully reached 7776
Languages English*
Device Deliveries
65%(T469) 11516
4�-0
ON 97%(331) 343
t 94%(565) 588
Wd
Detailed Delivery Results
L Voice{listen}
Goad Aftemaan this is Daniel Cortez with the City of Southlake with a friendly reminder that
a SPIN tavm hall forum will take place tamanow an Tuesday, November 8th at bpm on the
following items: In SPIN Neighbarhood#1, an applicant is proposing to make improvements
to the east side of the Verizon Wireless facility located at 501}W- Dove Road- Next, in SPIN
Neighbortrnad#11,an applicant is proposing to build an 11,004 square foot baufique event
verxie located at 175 Stonebridge Lane- Again,a SPIN Town Hall Forum will be held
tomorrow on November 8th at bpm in the Salthlake Town Hall Council Chambers- For more
information about SPIN, please go to www_southlakL$pin.org. Thank you far your attention.
Have a great day!
Successful deliveries 65% (7469)
Live Delivery 2529
Answering Machine 49411
Unsuccessful Deliveries 35% (4047)
Hangup 36B
Undeliverable 823
Opted-Out 711
Rad Phone Number 3
Phone Deactivated 7
Busy 96
No Answer 2679
Enwl
Good Aflemoon this is Daniel Cortez with the City of Southlake with a friendly reminder that
a SPIN town hall farum will take place tomonow on Tuesday November 8th at 6prn on the
following items: In SPIN Neighborhood#1, an applicant is proposing to make improvements
to the east side of the Verizon Wireless facility located at 500 W- Dove Road- Next, in SPIN
Neighbarhood#11,an applicant is proposing to build an 11,000 square foot boutique event
venue located at 175 Stonebridge Lane-
Email Sent 94% (555)
Email OptedOut 6% (33)
nSMS
Follow the Ink for mom infouTudion:http:llbit.1yiSPIN2416Nov8
Text:Email Sent 9T% (331)
Text Not Sent 2% (6)
Text OptedOut 0% (I)
Invalid Text Phase 1% (5)