Item 6 - ZA17-002 Ord. 480-657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-657b
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS
3A1A AND 3A2A, THOMAS MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1049,
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING
APPROXIMATELY 15.518 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “S-P-2”
GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO “S-P-2” GENERALIZED
SITE PLAN DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED
CONCEPT AND SITE PLANS ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “S -P-2” Generalized
Site Plan District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 2
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off -street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off -street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and
other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further co nsidered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade th e rights of
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
their original investment was made; and,
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 3
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilit ates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and ha s also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, s afety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Tracts 3A1A and 3A2A, Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstrac t No.
1049, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 15.518 acres,
and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “S-P-2” Generalized Site
Plan District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District as depicted on the approved
Concept and Site Plans attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and
subject to the following conditions:
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 4
APPROVAL OF ORD. NO 480-657
S-P-2 Regulations for Ordinance No. 480-657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 5
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 6
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 7
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 8
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 9
Variances approved with Ord. No. 480-657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 10
Council Motion at 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 480-657:
March 4, 2014; Approved at 2nd reading (6-1) pursuant to the following:
1. Approving requested variances—driveway and minimum required stacking and
Subdivision Ordinance 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended, which requires every lot to
be on a public or private street and as requested to allow the lots to be configured as
shown on the revised concept plan;
2. Also noting the requirements under this motion are pursuant to:
a. the revised renderings that were presented to Council this evening;
b. the Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions, and easements (CCR) as
presented to Council in the application this evening;
c. the revised landscape plan presented to Council (included in Attachment “B”
of this Ordinance);
d. the revised permitted uses, as presented from Adams Engineering in their
letter dated March 4, 2014, noting that the drive -through service will only be
allowed for Lot 4 (correction made in S-P-2 regulations);
e. also noting the balance of the concept plan for the buil dings that are not
included in this site plan approval that it is Council’s expectation there will be
100% masonry construction;
f. the permitted uses represented from Adams Engineering that the food service
hours of operations as noted in the application tha t “they will close no later
than 11:00 p.m.” that it is Council’s intention to have wording that mentions
that it will be “no earlier than 11:00 p.m. (correction made in S -P-2
regulations);
g. the office building in the concept plan will be a four story construction and that
additional parking will be presented on the first level underneath the building;
h. pursuant to the revised concept/site plan as presented this evening and
(included in Attachment “B” of this Ordinance);
3. Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 26, 2014:
1. Please make the following changes the Concept and/or Site Plans:
a. Show, label and dimension the width of the R.O.W. adjacent to the
site.
b. One 10’ x 50’ loading space is required for the hotel and that space
is provided on the west side of the building. Staff recommends
adding a loading space on the east side of the building adjacent to
the bar and restaurant or show how deliveries to the kitchen and bar
area will be made.
c. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(A), as amend ed,
requires that every lot front on a public or a private street. Council
approval of a variance will be required to allow the lot configuration
as shown. A variance was granted by City Council.
2. Please move the S-P-2 regulation regarding building articulation to the
section for Lot 1. The way the regulation is written, all future buildings
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 11
would be allowed to not meet the articulation requirements before City
Council has a chance to see the proposed elevations (corrected in the S-P-
2 regulations).
3. Revise the parking provided for Lot 1 in the Site Data Summary Chart on
the Concept Plan to 212 spaces.
4. Revise the office square footage in the first paragraph of Section 2.2 of the
TIA (48,000 s.f. should be 96,000 s.f.). The square footage is correctly
shown in Table 1 –Trip Generation Summary just below the paragraph.
5. Please make the following changes with regard to easements:
a. Label the existing common access easement on Lots 6R and 7R, Block 1,
Mesco Addition as shown on the plat recorded as Instrument No.
D211037987, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
6. All driveways/points of ingess/egress must comply with the Driveway
Ordinance No. 634, as amended). The following changes are needed:
a. The proposed driveway onto E. SH 114 does not meet the minimum 25 0
feet of spacing (60 feet shown) from an approved driveway and common
access easement located on Lot 7R, Block 1, Mesco Addition (case ZA96 -
109). The driveway/common access easement on Lot 7R1, Block 1 is
labeled to be abandoned. Prior to issuance of a pe rmit for the proposed
driveway on SH 114, a copy of the executed and recorded instrument(s) for
the off-site and on-site common access easements and agreement to
abandon the common access easement and driveway on the approved Lot
7R, Block 1, Mesco Addition (case ZA96-109) must be provided.
7. Revise the renderings and/or the Concept and Site Plans so that the
landscaped and sidewalk areas adjacent to the hotel entrance match. The
renderings are showing a landscaped area where a paved area is shown
on the Concept and Site Plans.
Tree Conservation Comments:
1. The submitted Development Regulations propose that the western
property line adjacent to the multi-family residential lots will be
screened with a vegetated screening of: existing plant material,
required plantings within the buffer and additional large shrubs and
accent trees planted within the bufferyard. There are a significant
amount of existing trees and associated vegetation along the west and
north property lines. Identify these trees and designa te if they will be
preserved, removed, considered marginal, and show how the proposed
west bufferyard landscaping will be integrated with the existing
vegetation.
2. The Preliminary Grading Plan shows that the McPherson Branch Creek
on Lot 6 is proposed to be graded and improved. There is one large
Post Oak tree on the back of Lot 7R, Block 1, Mesco Addition that
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 12
might be on the Kimball Park, Lot 6 property. The proposed grading
and south access drive look like they may alter the existing tree. Please
locate and identify this tree on the submitted plans.
Interior Landscape and Bufferyard Comments:
1. Some of the parking lot islands measure less than 12’ in width from
back-of-curb to back-of-curb. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum
width of 12’ back-to-back if curbed or 13’ edge-to-edge if no curb is
intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall.
2. No bufferyard is proposed along the east property line of Lot 6 in the
Summary Chart, but a bufferyard is shown on the concept plan. The
east bufferyard along the east property line of Lot 6 is required to be a
5’ – A, adjacent to the commercial and office properties , and a 10’ – E
along North Kimball Avenue. Include an S-P-2 regulation if a bufferyard
will not be provided.
3. Some of the Bufferyards on the Concept Plan and the Bufferyard
Summary Charts do not match.
1. Lot 3, west bufferyard is required to be a 10’ – B, and is labeled 10’ –
C on the Concept Plan, and 5’ – A in the Bufferyard Summary Chart.
4. The parking lot landscape islands are required to contain at least the
minimum of the required canopy tree as shown along with shrubs,
ground cover, ornamental grasses, seasonal color or a combination of
these plant materials. Turf grass is not acceptable vegetation within the
parking lot landscape islands.
Public Works/Engineering Review
General Comments:
1. Please provide an updated traffic impact analysis.
Preliminary Utility Comments:
1. No 90º bends, use 2-45º bends.
2. All waterlines to be public and in easements.
3. 12” waterline not on the City’s Master Water Plan, therefore no city
participation in upsizing.
4. Any sanitary sewer lines crossing lot lines will need to be public and
contained in easements.
5. Extend SS-1 west to property line.
6. Extend SS-4 to west property line.
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 13
APPROVAL OF ORD. NO 480-657a
(Changes to Lot 1 - Cambria Hotel only)
S-P-2 Regulations for Ordinance No. 480-657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 14
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 15
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 16
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 17
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 18
City Council 2nd Reading Motion for Ordinance No. 480-657a:
June 2, 2015; Approved at 2nd reading (6-0):
1. subject to Staff Report dated May 26, 2015 and Site Plan Review Summary
No. 1 dated April 16, 2015;
2. noting that all regulations associated with the zoning case ZA13 -135 shall
remain in place;
3. revisions to case ZA13-135 are those exhibits presented and approved this
evening and those changes indicated in the permitted uses and development
regulations for S-P-2 zoning located on Attachment ‘D’, Page 1 of the Staff
Report dated May 26, 2015 (See attached in Exhibit B of this ordinance)
4. subject to the material boards presented this evening;
5. noting Council’s approval of spandrel glass with no metal banding;
6. approving Option ‘1’, four-post, polycarbonate roof porte cochere; approving
Option ‘1’, polycarbonate conference center awnings to match the porte
cochere; and approving Option ‘1’ polycarbonate in the swim/patio area to
match the porte cochere and conference center awnings.
Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated April 16, 2015
The proposed revisions are only to Lot 1 of the Kimball Park Development. All previously approved plans
and conditions of approval remain in effect unless specifically revised as part of this request.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. The submitted Development Regulations propose that the western property line adjacent to the multi-
family residential lots will be screened with a vegetated screening of: existing plant material, required
plantings within the buffer and additional large shrubs and accent trees planted within the bufferyard.
There are a significant amount of existing trees and associated vegetation along the west and north
property lines. Identify these trees and designate if they will be preserved, removed, considered
marginal, and show how the proposed west bufferyard landscaping will be integrated with the existing
vegetation.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
INTERIOR LANDSCAPE & BUFFERYARDS COMMENTS:
1. The parking lot landscape islands are required to contain at least the minimum of th e required canopy
tree as shown along with shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, seasonal color or a combination
of these plant materials. Turf grass is not acceptable vegetation within the parking lot landscape
islands.
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 19
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
PRELIMINARY UTILITY COMMENTS:
7. No 90º bends, use 2-45º bends.
8. All waterlines to be public and in easements.
9. 12” waterline not on the City’s Master Water Plan, therefore no city participation in upsizing.
10. Any sanitary sewer lines crossing lot lines will need to be public and contained in easements.
11. Extend SS-1 west to property line.
12. Extend SS-4 to west property line.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22” X 34” full size sheets) and a completed
Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works
Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan
checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website.
* A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748 -
8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer’s Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Develo per’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the City of
Southlake for a period of two years for all development projects. The Maintenance Bond
cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836.
Fire Department Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for all commercial struct ures in excess of 6,000
square feet, with coverage extended into the attic if comprised of combustible construction. (per
2009 I.F.C. Sec. 903.3.1.3 as amended). Also, the restaurants classified as an A -2 occupancy
will require an automatic sprinkler system with an occupant load in excess of 100.
All sprinkled buildings are required to be equipped with a fire alarm in compliance with NFPA 72,
the 2009 International Fire Code, and the City of Southlake amendments.
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 20
A complete set of plans for the underground fire protection line, fire sprinkler system, and fire
alarm system shall be submitted to Reed Fire Protection for review and approval at 14135 Midway
Road in Addison, Texas 75001. Business phone is 214 -638-7599.
A Knox Box Rapid Key entry system shall be installed on the buildings near access to the riser
room. Keys must be provided to access the riser room. The Knox Box can be ordered on the
Internet at www.knoxbox.com.
A 5 inch Fire Department Connection shall be installed on each build ing, with a locking Knox cap
attached to the FDC to prevent debris from entering the connection.
An exterior audible/visual fire alarm device must be installed above the Fire Department
Connection on each sprinkled building to indicate when a fire alarm c ondition is present in the
building, or located as near as possible to the FDC, on the building, if the FDC is installed
remotely.
Approved suite numbers and/or building address shall be posted on all new buildings in such a
position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. All
numbers shall contrast with their background.
Electrical, Mechanical, Roof Access, Fire Alarm Panel, Sprinkler Riser and all other pertinent
rooms must be labeled with appropriate signag e.
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the
riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main,
the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check
is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire lanes require minimum 30 ft. inside turn radius and minimum 54 ft. outside turn radius .
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants required at a maximum spacing of 300 feet for commercial locations that contain un -
sprinkled buildings, and 600 feet for commercial locations that contain completely sprinkled
buildings.(If all buildings in the complex are completely sprinkled, then hydrant locations are
acceptable except for adding a hydrant at the South entrance into the complex off of the service
road of State Highway 114)(If all building are not completely sprinkled, then hydrants will nee d to
be added and relocated to meet requirements).
A fire hydrant shall be within 100 feet of each Fire Department Connection, and the Fire
Department Connection within 50 feet of fire lane access.(Fire Department Connection locations
not indicated on plans).
Conditions of approval of Ordinance No. 480-657b:
City Council motion at 1st Reading:
February 2, 2016; Approved (6 -0) pursuant to the staff report dated January 26, 2016, Concept/Site Plan
Review Summary No. 3, dated January 25, 2016, noting that we are granting the variances which were
approved in the original Zoning Change and Concept Plan on March 4, 2014; the stacking depth of 17.6’
on the N. Kimball Ave. driveway and 34.2’ of stacking depth shown on the S.H. 114 driveway rather than
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 21
the minimum depth of 150’and noting that the lot configuration does not meet the requirement that every
lot front on a public or private street, noting that prior to the next hearing, the applicant will address the
landscaping variances around the garage, and noting that the applicant will come forth mitigating the
articulation variances noted on the building and the garage, noting some willingness to relax on the
articulation on the north side of the garage, but there still needs to be some stone veneer o r column
treatments at a minimum throughout the garage elevations on the north, south east and west, noting that
the elastomeric coating samples in buildings and to the extent to help Council understand the
architectural and physical qualities of that buil ding material will be brought forth to Council prior to the
next hearing.
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 22
APPROVAL OF ORD. NO 480-657b
(Changes to Lot 3 – Offices and Kimball Park only)
S-P-2 Regulations for Ordinance No. 480-657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 23
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 24
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 25
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 26
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 27
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 28
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE REQUEST LETTER
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 29
Council Motion at 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 480-657b:
March 1, 2016; Approved (7-0) subject to the following:
1. Granting the following variances:
a. The driveways do not meet the minimum required stacking depth of 150’,
approximately 17.6’ of stacking depth is shown on the N. Kimball Ave.
driveway and 34.2’ of stacking depth is shown on the State Hwy. 114
driveway;
b. Also granting a variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(a),
as amended, which requires that every lot front on a pu blic or a private street,
a variance is requested and approved to allow the lots to be configured as
shown on the Concept Plan;
2. Noting that Council is accepting the revised Concept Plan and development
regulations for the S-P-2 zoning dated February 23, 2016 and under Attachment “D”
of the staff report;
3. Accepting the revised Site Plan, Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan found
under Attachment “D” of the staff report;
4. Accepting the revised office building and parking garage elevations;
5. Noting the required parking will reduce by one from what was presented and will now
be at 435 (S-P-2 regulations in Attachment “B” have been revised);
6. The staff report dated February 23, 2016 (includes language that all previous
plans and conditions of approval remain in effect unless specifically noted in
this request.) and;
7. Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated February 23, 2016 (below).
Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated February 23, 2016
1. Please make the following changes the Concept and/or Site Plans:
a. Please make the following changes to the impervious coverage and open space areas
and percentages in the table on the Concept Plan.
i. The open space area plus the impervious area should add to the net area for each
lot and for the total. The percentages of open space and impervious coverage
should total 100% for each lot and for the total. Please change the percentage of
impervious coverage for Lot 4 to 77% and change the percentage of open space
for Lot 5 to 21%.
2. Please make the following revisions to the elevations:
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 30
a. Please dimension and label the height of the building to the predominant parapet height on
the elevations and not to the roof height.
b. The scale is incorrect. Please add the correct written scale under a graphic scale.
c. Please provide a material sample board of all exterior materials to be used.
3. The proposed office development is subject to the requirements in the Corridor and Residential
Overlay Districts except as noted in the S-P-2 regulations. The following Overlay requirements
have been modified in the S-P-2 regulations:
a. A regulation has been added to allow the vertical and horizontal articulation on the office
building as shown on the Site Plan. The north and south elevations do not meet the
horizontal and vertical articulation requirements.
b. Please include a regulation to allow the articulation on the parking garage as shown. None
of the garage elevations meet the horizontal and vertical articulation requirements.
c. A regulation has been added to allow painted concrete an d metal as permitted façade
materials on the office building and precast concrete panels as a permitted façade
material on the garage.
4. Please revise the drive lanes, trash enclosure location and parking islands and spaces on the
Boka Powell plans to match the Site Plan (S4.0).
* A bank teller zone is shown on the west side of the building on the Boka Powell Site Plan and an
S-P-2 regulation has been added to allow a teller drive -up lane and window on the west elevation
and the reduction of 12 provided parking spaces. Approval of a Site Plan by the City Council
following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be required to allow the
addition of a drive-through and window.
* Ordnance No. 480, Section 36.6 requires 3 loading spaces for office buildings 100,000 – 199,999
square feet in size. A regulation has been added to allow 2 loading spaces as shown on the
Concept and Site Plans.
* The Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Easements for Kimball Park was approved with
the original Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Kimball Park and it remains in effect with
this request unless otherwise noted.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* The submitted Tree Conservation Plan complies with the previously approved Tree Conservation
Plan.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 31
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Within the proposed Development Regulations the applicant is proposing to vary from the interior
landscape area and plant material that is required to be provided for the footprint area of the parking
garage. The interior landscape calculations indicate that enough landscape area is provided across
the site but the required plant material is not provided.
Parking garages shall be considered as building in accordance with Section 3.3 in the Landscape
Ordinance 544-B.
2. Not all of the parking landscape islands are 12’ width form back -of-curb to back-of-curb. Ensure
that parking landscape islands are at least 12- wide form back-of-curb to back-or-curb. Parking lot
islands shall have a minimum width of 12’ back-to-back if curbed or 13’ edge-to-edge if no curb is
intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall.
3. None of the required interior landscape or bufferyards shrubs are shown on the submitted Landscape
Plan. Please show the shrubs to be provided on the landscape plan .
5. Put the quantities of each plant material in the plant material list.
6. In the plant material list, please use a different key for purple heart groundcover since the same key is
used for Palatka holly.
7. The Development Regulations state that the western property line will be screened with a vegetated
screening of: existing plant material, required plantings and additional large shrubs and accent trees
that will achieve a solid screening of 8’ in height and will be shown on the landscape plan. The
plantings shown within the west bufferyard are only the minimal required plantings for the 5’ – A type
bufferyard and the shrubs are not shown. Most of the existing trees shown to be preserved are on the
property line, within a utility easement, and are partially the proposed developments and the adjoining
property owners. Based on the information that is provided, the proposed landscaping within the west
bufferyard does not seem to comply with the proposed Development Regulations.
9. Each individual parking lot landscape island shall contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the
remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, or seasonal color. Parking lot landscape
islands which have light poles for lighting the parking areas may substitute two (2) understory/accent
trees for the required canopy tree. All required landscape areas shall be evenly distributed throughout
the entire required parking lot landscape areas.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 32
2. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must
include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially
reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution
(especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer Syste m. It is highly recommended the project
manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during
mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map
showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include
timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be
submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a
registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall requir e a permit from the Building
Inspections Department prior to construction.
5. Traffic Impact Analysis on file for overall development. No update is required.
* Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be
found in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
EASEMENTS:
1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
WATER COMMENTS:
2. Minimum size for water lines is 8”.
3. Commercial and industrial developments require fire hydrant spacing of 300’ maximum for non -
sprinkled buildings or 600’ for sprinkled buildings.
* Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way.
* The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc.
* X” water line on (street name) shall conform to the City’s water concept plan.
* Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
* Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
4. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8”. Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary
sewer system built to City standards.
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 33
5. Extend sanitary sewer to the eastern/western/northern/southern property line and provide sewer stub
to adjacent property.
6. Add a note: Private sanitary sewer services need a plumbing permit and must be inspected by
building inspections prior to burial.
* Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
* Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #XX and require s a fee to be paid prior to
beginning construction ($0.00/Acre).
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard det ails
and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre -
construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114.
Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly
to TxDOT for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748 -
8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on
the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet, and a dry
standpipe for the two-story parking garage. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended)
Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001.
Phone 214-638-7599.
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 34
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the
riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main,
the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double c heck
is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter
of buildings on a “hose-lay” basis for sprinkled buildings and within 150 feet of all exterior portions
of the perimeter of non-sprinkled buildings. Fire apparatus access shall be an all-weather
surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus.
(A minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Label fire lanes throughout the property; appear to be
missing around the parking garage)
Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn
radius. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with completely
sprinkled buildings. (Hydrant spacing does not meet the requirements; add hydrants as necessary
around the parking garage)
Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems and standpipes must be within 100 feet of a
fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes. (FDC locations not indicated on plans)
Add FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection, and fire hydrants as necessary to meet
requirements for the office building and parking garage.
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting for Kimball Park was held January 6, 2014.
* A preliminary plat for the entire property that conforms to the site plan must be approved and a
final plat must be approved and filed prior to issuance of a building permit.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended, requires that every lot front on a
public or a private street. City Council approved a variance with the first Zoning Change and
Concept Plan application to allow the lots to be configured as shown.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 69 3, as amended with regard to type of
lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 35
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Sect ion 43,
Overlay Zones except where noted in the S -P-2 regulations.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 36
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have be en made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of So uthlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 37
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract
or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,
under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until
final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to post the propos ed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for
a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 38
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 2nd day of February, 2016.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 1st day of March, 2016.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 39
EXHIBIT “A”
Being described as Tracts 3A1A a nd 3A2A, Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 15.518 acres, and more fully and
completely described below:
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 40
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 41
EXHIBIT “B”
Overall Exhibit approved with Ord. No. 657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 42
Overall Exhibit approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 43
Concept Plan approved with Ord. No. 657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 44
Concept Plan approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 45
Concept Plan Data Summary Chart approved with Ord. No. 657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 46
Concept Plan Data Summary Chart approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 47
Site Plan approved with Ord. No. 657
Lot 1 - Cambria Hotel
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 48
Site Plan approved with Ord. No. 657a
Lot 1 - Cambria Hotel
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 49
Site Plan approved with Ord. No. 657b
Lot 3 – The Offices at Kimball Park
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 50
Landscape Plan - Lot 1 approved with Ord. No. 657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 51
Plant Material List – Lot 1 approved with Ord. No. 657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 52
Landscape Plan - Lot 1 approved with Ord. No. 657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 53
Plant Material List – Lot 1 approved with Ord. No. 657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 54
Landscape Plan - Lot 6 approved with Ord. No. 657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 55
Landscape Plan - Lot 3 approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 56
Plant Material List – Lot 1 approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 57
Tree Conservation Plan approved with Ord. No. 657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 58
Tree Conservation Plan approved with Ord. No. 657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 59
Tree Conservation Plan approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 60
Phase 1 Construction Plan
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 61
Hotel Renderings approved with Ord. No. 657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 62
Hotel Renderings
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 63
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 64
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 65
Hotel Renderings approved with Ord. No. 657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 66
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 67
Hotel Elevations approved with Ord. No.657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 68
Hotel Elevations approved with Ord. No.657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 69
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 70
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 71
Revised “Option 1” Porte Cochere Canopy Elevations approved with Ord. No.657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 72
Revised “Option 1” Conference Center Canopy Elevations approved with Ord. No.657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 73
Revised “Option 1” Pool/Patio Canopy Elevations approved with Ord. No.657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 74
Hotel Pool and Patio Area approved with Ord. No.657
Hotel Pool and Patio Area approved with Ord. No.657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 75
Upper Floor Plans approved with Ord. No.657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 76
Floor Plan approved with Ord. No.657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 77
Conference Center Floor Plan approved with Ord. No. 480-657a
Fitness Center Floor Plan approved with Ord. No. 480-657a
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 78
First Floor Examples approved with Ord. No.657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 79
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 80
Room Examples approved with Ord. No.657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 81
Office Building Renderings approved with Ord. No.657
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 82
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 83
Office Building Renderings approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 84
Office Building Renderings approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 85
Office Building Renderings approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 86
Office Building Elevations approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 87
Office Building Elevations approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 88
Materials approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 89
Parking Garage Elevations approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 90
Floor Plans approved with Ord. No. 657b
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 91
Ordinance No. 480-657b Page 92
Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Easements
(approved with Ord. No.657)
See Ordinance No. 657