Item 6A CITY OF
S0UTHLA1<,,..E
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
January 10, 2017
CASE NO: ZA16-051
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Delta Southlake Center(fka White
Chapel Village)
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: RREAF Southlake Hospitality, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and
Concept/ Site Plan for Delta Southlake Center (formerly known as White Chapel
Village) on property described as Tracts 3A2, 3A2B and 3D, Larkin H. Chivers
Survey, Abstract No. A300, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, Lots 1A, 2A
and 3A, Block 1, Chivers Addition, originally platted as Tracts 1, 2 and 3, Block 1,
Chivers Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas, in the
Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, and Lots 1 and a portion of Lot 2R,
Block A80, Peck Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas and located at 1313, 1325, 1350 and 1375 N.White Chapel Ave., and 101,
201, 301 and 319 E. State Highway 114, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "AG"
Agricultural District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service
District and "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Proposed Zoning: "S-P-2"
Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #7.
DETAILS: This project is located on approximately 15.872 acres at the southeast corner of E.
State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd.
The purpose of this item is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site
Plan for Delta Southlake Center (formerly known as White Chapel Village) for the
development of a six-story full service hotel with 240 rooms on approximately 6.28
acres (Lot 1) and conceptual approval of two multi-story office and retail buildings
with below grade parking, one multi-story office building and a multi-story parking
garage with attached retail uses on approximately 9.592 acres (Lot 2). The
permitted uses for Lot 1 are those uses found in the "HC" Hotel District to also
allow an approximately 6,000 square foot restaurant and bar and a conference
center with approximately 7,000 square feet of meeting space. Room sizes will
range from 325 square feet to 820 square feet.A future standalone retail/restaurant
building is also proposed for the hotel lot. The permitted uses for the future
development on Lot 2 are those uses found in the "0-2" Office District and "C-3"
General Commercial District (with some uses prohibited) along with parking
garages and structured parking. The"0-2"Office District zoning,which is the base
zoning for Lot 2, allows a maximum height of six (6) stories or ninety (90) feet.
Design guidelines that include building materials, streetscape, courtyards and
walls, ornamental metal fencing, awnings and amenities have been submitted.
On November 15, 2016, City Council placed the following conditions in their motion
for approval at 1 st reading.
Case No.
ZA16-051
Council condition at 1s' reading Applicant's response for 12/6 meeting
Provide a revised Concept/Site Plan showing A revised Site Plan was submitted showing 27
additional parking to accommodate the hotel additional spaces to be allowed on Lot 1 and 63
parking demand, this revision should include additional spaces to be allowed on Lot 2 for a total
details related to screening and landscaping. of 427 spaces if the hotel demand exceeds the 337
spaces to be provided.
Detail exactly which amenities, for instance the The Phase 1 Landscape Plan was revised to show
traffic circle, entry features, streetscape, the amenities to be provided with Phase 1 more
wildflower planting, etc.,that will be provided in clearly and a response letter to the 1s' reading
conjunction with hotel construction for Phase stipulations has been provided also listing the
1. amenities to be provided.
With regards to the S-P-2 zoning regulations,
we're requiring that as future Site Plans are An S-P-2 regulation was been added requiring that
submitted on the remainder of the site for an updated parking study and traffic study be
consideration, that an updated parking study submitted in conjunction with all future Site Plans.
and traffic study be submitted in conjunction
with those future Site Plans.
Council is directing staff to determine the An exhibit of the planned White Chapel
feasibility or the current plans that are already improvements was included in the presentation
in place for a median cut to accommodate exit showing a full median cut at the entrance to the
and entry at the White Chapel proposed hotel on White Chapel Blvd.
entrance.
The examples of retaining wall materials in the
Provide clarity of exactly the materials and Design Guidelines were narrowed to natural stone.
design of the retaining walls on the property. The location and height of the retaining walls is
shown on the Retaining Wall Exhibit.
A plant legend was been added to the Phase 1
Landscape Plan showing 8' Nellie R. Stevens hollies
Provide an eight foot hedge screening around on the north and east sides of the pool area. Five
the pool area. gallon Needlepoint hollies are shown on the west
side of the pool.A review comment was been added
to require an 8' screen on the west side of the pool.
Meet with staff and submit an agreement
regarding preservation of the trees on the The applicant met with staff and provided a revised
northwest corner of the property with a Tree Conservation Plan and Phase I Landscape
generally specific tree identification of what is Plan showing the trees on the northwest corner to
going to be preserved on the general be preserved with Phase 1.
northwest corner of the property.
Attempt to have a representative of the
operator at second reading to answer any A representative of the operator will be available.
general questions.
An S-P-2 regulation has been added to limit the
The S-P-2 outparcel Concept Plan is approved retail portion of the office/retail mixture to not exceed
for multi-story office/retail buildings and thirty percent. A list of prohibited uses has been
parking garage, a mixture with the retail added for Lot 2. Buildings on Lot 2 are shown as
portion not exceeding thirty percent. multi-story. Any buildings over three stories will
require approval of a Specific Use Permit.
Approval of a Site Plan by City Council following a recommendation by the
Case No.
ZA16-051
Planning and Zoning Commission will be required prior to any construction of the
future development proposed for Lot 2. Site Plan approval will be based on
conformance to the underlying "S-P-2" zoning district. Any future changes to the
Concept/Site Plan, S-P-2 uses and regulations or the Design Guidelines after City
Council approval will require approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan
to modify the "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District zoning.
The "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District Development Regulations for Lot 2
are based on the "0-2" Office District regulations with the following
modifications:
Regulation "0-2" Office District "S-P-2" Regulation
7F0/ fnr t�ici4o AS; A whNo
Maximum Impervious o �-ror- o 'r`c�` �
65/0 78.5% for Lot 1
coverage 65% for Lot 2
Front - 30'
Side - 15' (25' adjacent to single
Setbacks family residential) No setbacks on internal lot lines
Rear- 10' (25' adjacent to single
family residential)
General Office— 1 space per 300 sf
Restaurant— 1 space per 100 sf or 1 General Office — 1 space per 300 sf
Off-street Parking space per 3 seats, whichever is Restaurant— 1 space per 100 sf
greater) Retail — 1 space per 200 sf
Retail — 1 space per 200 sf
Bufferyards Section 42 requires bufferyards Allow no bufferyard along internal lot
along all property lines. lines.
The Site Data Summary for Lot 1 is below:
Site Data Summary for Lot 1 (Hotel)
Existing Zoning C3, CS, SF-1A
Proposed Zoning S-P-2
Land Use Designation Mixed Use
Gross/Net Acreage 6.28
Total Building Floor Area (Gross) 165,475 sq. ft.
Restaurant and Bar Area ± 6,000 sq. ft.
Conference Space ± 7,000 sq. ft.
Building Height/Number of Stories 90' max. (73' 4" shown) and 6 stories
Open Space % 26.3%
Impervious Coverage % 73.7%
Total Parking Required (S-P-2) 313
Total Parking Spaces Provided 364 (including 16 spaces on Lot 2)
The "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District Development Regulations for Lot 1
are based on the "HC" Hotel District regulations with the following modifications:
Case No.
ZA16-051
Regulation "HC" Hotel District "S-P-2" Regulation
Maximum Impervious 70% 7-5-04 78.5% for Lot 1
coverage
Front - 30'
Side - 15' (25' adjacent to single family
Setbacks residential) No setbacks on internal lot lines
Rear- 10' (25' adjacent to single family
residential
Hotel — 1 space per room
Off-street Parking Restaurant— 1 space per 100 SF 303 spaces per Parking Study
Conf. Center— 1 space per 3 seats -ink to Parking Study
495 spaces)
Residential Adjacency Overlay District Allow horizontal and vertical
Articulation regulations require vertical and articulation as shown on the site
horizontal articulation on all facades. plan and building elevations
Residential Adjacency Overlay District
regulations require that no trash The trash receptacle is to be
receptacle enclosures be located within located no closer than 5' to
Trash Receptacles 50' of single family residential property. residential property. A retaining
Trash receptacles are to be screened by wall will serve as a screening wall
a minimum 8' solid masonry screen wall for the trash receptacle.
matching the principal building.
Residential Adjacency Overlay District
regulations require that no non-single Allow the building to encroach
Setback from family residential building encroach in approximately slope 39'4"into the
residential the area above a line having a slope of 4:1 slope from the single family
4:1 from any single family residential residential property to the south.
property.
Section 39, Screening and Fencing, Allow a 6' metal fence with
Screening requires an 8' solid fence where non- masonry columns and vegetative
residential uses abut a residentially screening adjacent to the SF-1A
zoned lot. property to the south.
Corridor Overlay District regulations
require that exposed columns be Allow wood cladding at the top of
Exposed Columns constructed of or clad in the same exposed columns.
masonry material as the principal
structure.
Bufferyards Section 42 requires bufferyards along all Allow no bufferyard along internal
property lines. lot lines.
To address concerns and comments at the December 6, 2016 City Council
meetings, the applicant has revised the plans and provided a summary of the
changes. immary of Changes
VARIANCE
REQUESTED: A variance to Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended, requiring a maximum
illumination projected from one property to another to not exceed 0.2 footcandles
horizontal and 0.5 footcandles vertical is requested to allow illumination of 3.0
Case No.
ZA16-051
footcandles horizontal and vertical.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site
Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 7, dated November 29, 2016
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-720
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Summary of changes to plans since 12/6/16 Council meeting
Link to White Chapel Improvement Plan
Link to Narrative
Link to S-P-2 Regulations
Link to Design Guidelines
Link to Parking Analysis and Consultant's Reviews
Link to Plans
Page 1 - 3 Concept Development Plans Site Plan
Pages 4 - 5 Floor Plans
Pages 6 - 17 Elevations and Renderings
Pages 18 - 23 Garage Plans (New)
Pages 24— 29 Phase 2 and Garage Renderings (New)
Page 30 Site Plan
Page 31 - 37 Civil Plans
Pages 38-43 Landscape, Tree Conservation and Pedestrian Plans
Pages 44-45 Cross Sections
Pages 46-47 Images and Entry Features
Link to Traffic Impact Analysis
Link to Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix ( hard copy on request)
Link to Amendment to Traffic Impact Analysis
Link to Traffic Impact Analysis Consultant's Reviews & Recommendations
Link to Drainage Study
Link to Consultant's Review of Drainage Study
Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report
Link to SPIN meeting Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA16-051
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Dominion Southlake Properties, LLC, White Chapel Village Center
Partners, LLC
APPLICANT: RREAF Southlake Hospitality, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: Southeast corner of E. State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. and
addressed as 1313, 1325, 1350 and 1375 N. White Chapel Ave., and 101,
201, 301 and 319 E. State Highway 114.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 3A2, 3A2B and 3D, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. A300,
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, Lots 1A, 2A and 3A, Block 1,
Chivers Addition, originally platted as Tracts 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Chivers
Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas, in the
Larkin H. Chivers Survey,Abstract No. 300, and Lots 1 and a portion of Lot
2R, Block A80, Peck Addition.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District and
"SF-1A" Single Family Residential District
PROPOSED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District.
HISTORY: The property was annexed into the City in 1957 and given the "AG"
Agricultural Zoning District designation.
- A Final Plat for Chivers Addition (ZA79-008), which includes the majority
of the property, was approved March 6, 1979. Zoning on the property at
that time was "L" Light Industrial. The property was given the "LI" Light
Industrial zoning designation with the adoption of Ordinance No. 261 and
the official Zoning Map in 1981, the "R2" Retail 2 zoning designation with
the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and the official Zoning Map in
1986 and the"C-3"General Commercial District zoning designation with the
adoption of the Zoning Ordinance No 480 and the official Zoning Map on
September 19, 1989.
-A Final Plat for Peck Addition (ZA80-023),which are the existing lots west
and southwest of the hotel site adjacent to N. White Chapel Blvd., was
approved August 19, 1980. Zoning on the property at that time was "A-3"
One-Family District. The Peck Addition was given the "SF-1" zoning
designation with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and the official
Zoning Map in 1986 and the"SF-1A"zoning designation with the adoption
of the Zoning Ordinance No 480 and the official Zoning Map on September
19, 1989, with the exception of Lot 1, which was rezoned to "0-1" Office
District prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 480.
- A Zoning Change and Concept Plan for the Clariden School (ZA93-012)
on Lot 1, Block A80, Peck Addition from "0-1" Office District to "CS"
Community Service District was approved May 4, 1993.The school building
has recently been demolished.
SOUTH LAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2030 future land use designation for the site is "Mixed Use".
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-051 Page 1
The Mixed Use land use designation is defined within Southlake 2030 as
the following:
"The purpose of the Mixed Use designation is to provide an option for large-
scale, master-planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses
such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. The
range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying
proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category necessitates
comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New development
must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing development. Further,
special attention should be placed on the design and transition between
different uses. Typically, the Mixed Use designation is intended for
medium- to higher-intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities,
retail centers, and residential uses. Nuisance-free, wholly enclosed light
manufacturing and assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are
permitted if designed to be compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable
activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-
Public, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail
Commercial, and Office Commercial categories previously discussed."
Hotel Uses in the Mixed Use Designation:
o "Hotel uses should be full-service hotels at market-driven locations,
primarily in the S.H. 114 Corridor. Full-service, for the purposes of
this plan, shall be hotels that include a table-service restaurant
within or directly attached to the hotel. Other services or amenities
typically included would be bell service and room service, as well as
available meeting space.
o The desire is to approve hotels adequate to support market-driven
commerce in the City, paying attention to the product mix such that
the hospitality services in the area are complementary to one
another."
Mobility& Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Concept / Site Plan shows two driveways onto E. State Hwy. 114
frontage road and two driveways onto N. White Chapel Blvd. The northern
driveway onto N.White Chapel is proposed to be added with development
of Lot 2 in the future. The 2030 Master Thoroughfare Plan shows State
Hwy. 114 as a freeway with right of way widths from 300'-500'. Adequate
right of way exists for deceleration lanes at both proposed driveways on E.
State Hwy. 114. N. White Chapel Blvd. is shown as a four-lane undivided
arterial with 88' of right of way. A small portion of right of way is being
dedicated near the intersection of E. State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel
Blvd. for street improvements. Adequate right of way exists for the
deceleration lane at the proposed driveway onto White Chapel Blvd.and for
a future deceleration at the future driveway onto White Chapel Blvd.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows a <8' sidewalk on the east side of White
Chapel Blvd. and a>8' multi-use trail along the S.H. 114 frontage road.A 5'
sidewalk is shown on the hotel property along N. White Chapel Blvd. An 8'
multi-use trail will be required along the S.H. 114 frontage road and a 5'
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-051 Page 2
sidewalk will be required along N.White Chapel Blvd.adjacent to Lot 2 with
the future platting and development of Lot 2.
Maior Corridors Urban Design Plan
The Urban Design Plan also includes a few recommendations pertaining to
the State Highway 114 corridor where this site is proposed to be located.
Link to State Hwy. 114 Private Development Recommendations
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The Concept / Site Plan proposes two driveways onto the E. State Hwy.
114 frontage road and two driveways onto N. White Chapel Blvd. TheMo
driveways onto S.H. 114 and the southern driveway on N. White Chapel
Blvd. are proposed to be constructed with development of the hotel on Lot
1. The northern driveway on White Chapel Blvd. is proposed to be
constructed with the future development of Lot 2. TxDot is requiring
deceleration lanes to be constructed at the two driveways on S.H. 114 with
the development of the hotel.
Traffic Counts
E. State Hwy. 114 Frontage Road (81E)
(Between White Chapel Blvd. and Highland St.)
24hr East Bound (2,489)
AM Peak AM (353)
PM Peak PM (266)
N. White Chapel Blvd. (59)
(Between Highland St and Dove - .
24hr North Bound (6,681) South Bound (7,017)
AM Peak AM (745) 7:45-8:45 AM Peak AM (471) 8:15-9:15 AM
PM Peak PM (508) 15:30-16:30 PM Peak PM (652) 17:15-18:15 PM
Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)was prepared for this development.A link to
the report along with an appendix and an amendment letter can be found at
the following links. The amendment letter contains the trip generation
counts based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip
Generation Manual, 9" Edition. A link to the City consultant's (Lee
Engineering) review of the TIA is also included below.
Link to TIA
Link to Amendment Letter
Lee Engineering Reviews of TIA
TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D
because it is a new project.
There is approximately 11.69% existing tree cover on the site, of which
none is proposed to be preserved.A standard zoning district requires that a
minimum 70% of existing tree cover be preserved.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-051 Page 3
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a
planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2
Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or
Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the
application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application.
The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds
that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural
roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the
Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement
procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
UTILITIES: Water for the site will connect to an existing 12"water line in White Chapel
Blvd. and to an existing 12" water line at the northwest corner of the
hospital property to the east.
Sanitary sewer for the site will connect to an existing 8"line at the northwest
corner of the hospital property to the east. An 8" public sanitary sewer line
will be extended from an existing lift station that will be abandoned on the
west side of N.White Chapel Blvd. across the site to the existing line on the
hospital property.
DRAINAGE: Drainage across the property is generally sheet flow from south to north to
existing TxDot culverts that will carry the discharge from the hotel site to the
Carillon detention ponds. The review of the Drainage Study by the City's
consultant, Teague, Nall and Perkins, requires that the applicant provide
further proof that the Carillon detention ponds have the capacity to handle
the discharge from the proposed development.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development:
A SPIN meeting was held for this project on September 8, 2015. A link to
the report is provided. ik to SPIN Repo
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on August 10,
2016. A link to the report is provided. _ink to Corridor Planning Committee
PLANNING AND ZONING
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-051 Page 4
COMMISSION ACTION: October 6, 2016; Tabled to the November 3, 2016 meeting.
November 3, 2016; Approved (5-1) subject to the staff report dated
November 3, 2016 and Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated
November 3, 2016 and granting the variance requested in the staff report
dated November 3, 2015.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: November 15, 2016;Approved at 1 s'reading (6-0)subject to the staff report
dated November 8, 2016, Site Plan Review Summary No. 6, dated
November 8, 2016, granting the variance as it relates to the Lighting
Ordinance No. 693, as amended, requiring a maximum illumination
projected from one property to another to not exceed 0.2 footcandles
horizontal and 0.5 footcandles vertical as requested to allow illumination of
3.0 footcandles horizontal and vertical, noting that prior to second reading
the applicant will provide a revised Concept/Site Plan showing additional
parking to accommodate the hotel parking demand, this revision should
include details related to screening and landscaping, prior to second
reading the applicant will detail exactly which amenities, for instance the
traffic circle, entry features, streetscape, wildflower planting, etc., that will
be provided in conjunction with hotel construction for Phase 1,with regards
to the S-P-2 zoning regulations,we're requiring that as future Site Plans are
submitted on the remainder of the site for consideration that an updated
parking study and traffic study be submitted in conjunction with those future
Site Plans, noting that Council is directing staff to determine the feasibility
or the current plans that are already in place for a median cut to
accommodate exit and entry at the White Chapel proposed entrance, the
applicant has agreed to provide before second reading to provide clarity of
exactly the materials and design of the retaining walls on the property, the
applicant has agreed to provide before second reading or at second
reading to provide an eight foot hedge screening around the pool area,the
applicant is also agreeing between now and second reading to meet with
staff and submit an agreement regarding preservation of the trees on the
northwest corner of the property with a generally specific tree identification
of what is going to be preserved on the general northwest corner of the
property, the applicant has agreed to attempt to have a representative of
the operator at second reading to answer any general questions and
Council is noting in this first reading approval that the S-P-2 outparcel
Concept Plan is approved for multi-story office/retail buildings and parking
garage, a mixture with the retail portion not exceeding thirty percent.
December 6, 2016; Tabled to the January 17, 2017 meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 7, dated November 29, 2016.
The City Council, after receiving a recommendation from the Planning and
Zoning Commission, may grant a modification or variance from the
provisions of Lighting Ordinance No 693, as amended, in any of the
following circumstances:
1) Upon finding that strict application of the Ordinance would not
forward the purposes of this Ordinance, or that alternatives
proposed by the applicant would satisfy the purposes of this
Ordinance at least to an equivalent degree.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-051 Page 5
2) Upon finding that an outdoor light, or system of outdoor lights
required for a particular use cannot reasonably comply with the
standard and provided sufficient illumination for safety or security,
as determined by recommended practices adopted by the
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America for the particular
use or other evidence submitted by a professional engineer or other
professional organization.
3) Upon finding where a literal application or enforcement of the
regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship and the relief granted would not be contrary to the public
interest or the intent but do substantial justice and be in accordance
with the spirit of the regulations and this Ordinance.
The City Council may impose such conditions on a modification or variance
which it deems appropriate to further the purposes of this Ordinance.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-051 Page 6
Vicinity Map
Delta South lake Center
s
a
a
kro x sy
C�
d s5
'n.3y.NIC ST
K
hE•
a •f�f�
ZA16-051
Zoning Change and
•• Concept 1 Site Pian
0 500 1000 2.000
c
R' E Feet
s
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-051 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA16-051 Review No.: Seven Date of Review: 11/29/16
Project Name: Site Plan —White Chapel Village
APPLICANT: Carl Schwab ENGINEER: Sandy Stephens
RREAF Holdings, LLC Cole
4245 N. Central Expy. Ste. 420 6175 Main St. Ste. 367
Dallas, TX 75205 Frisco, TX 75034
Phone: (214) 384-2549 Phone: (972) 624-6000
E-mail: carl@rreaf.com E-mail: sstephens@coletx.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
11/25/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. Based on our previous conversations, you have three options to rezone the property to allow for a
full service hotel use on Lot 1 as shown on the Concept/Site Plan. Split lot zoning is not permitted,
so approval of a Preliminary Plat and a Plat Revision is required with all three options. It is our
understanding that you wish to proceed with Option 2, so the comments below are based on that
understanding.
a. Option 1 is to rezone only the hotel site as "S-P-1 Detailed Site Plan District and leave the
rest of the site with the existing"C-3"General Commercial District, "AG"Agricultural District
and "SF-1A" Single Family Residential zoning.
b. Option 2 is to rezone the entire property to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District and to
provide a Concept Plan for the entire site showing permitted uses and building areas and a
Site Plan for the hotel lot.
c. Option 3 is to rezone the entire property to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District and to
provide a Concept/Site Plan for the entire site with a Site Plan for Lot 1 showing and full
service hotel and with no permitted uses and building areas shown for the remainder of the
site and a statement to the effect that any future development on the remainder of the
property will require approval of a Zoning Change and Concept and/or Site Plan.
2. Approval of a Site Plan by City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission will be required prior to any construction of the future development proposed for Lot 2.
Site Plan approval will be based on conformance to the underlying "S-P-2" zoning district. Any
future changes to the Concept/ Site Plan, S-P-2 uses and regulations or the Design Guidelines
after City Council approval will require approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/ Site Plan to
modify the "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District zoning.
3. Split lot zoning is not permitted. Approval of the zoning change is subject to approval of a
Preliminary Plat and approval and filing of Final Plats for the property.
4. Per Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 43.13.a.7, no trash receptacles or recycling
receptacles shall be located within 50' of single family residential property.An S-P-2 regulation has
been added to state that the dumpster enclosure shall be located no closer than 5' to residential
property.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 2
5. On the Concept Plans and Landscape Plan for Phase 2, please provide cross access to the
hospital property to the east and south to match the connections on the Site Plan for Phase 1
and the access easements on the Preliminary Plat.
6. Correct the legal description in the Design Guidelines to include the entirety of Lots 1 and 2.
The correct legal description is below:
Tracts 3A2, 3A2B and 3D, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. A300, City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, Lots 1A, 2A and 3A, Block 1, Chivers Addition, originally platted as
Tracts 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Chivers Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,
Texas, in the Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, and Lots 1 and a portion of Lot 2R,
Block A80, Peck Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and
located at 1313, 1325, 1350 and 1375 N. White Chapel Ave., and 101, 201, 301 and 319 E.
State Highway 114, Southlake, Texas.
7. Please make the following changes to Sheet C1.0:
a. The transformer and generator are to be screened by a 6' metal fence with vegetative
screening at the property line, which meets the requirements of the Residential
Adjacency Overlay District. An S-P-2 regulation is not required. The transformer and
generator must be completely screened from view from the property to the south prior
to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the hotel.
8. The illumination projected to the residential property to the south will exceed the 0.2 footcandles
horizontal and 0.5 footcandles vertical that is required by Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as
amended. A variance has been requested to allow illumination of 3.0 footcandles horizontal and
vertical.Verify that all other lighting regulations will be met and add additional variance requests if
necessary.
9. Please make the following changes to the Landscape Plan.
a. The Council motion for approval at 1 st reading includes a stipulation to provide an eight foot
hedge screening around the pool area. Five gallon Needlepoint Hollies are shown on the
west side of the pool. Please revise the plan to show an eight foot hedge on the west side
of the pool.
b. The south bufferyard on Lot 1 is required to be a 10' Type D adjacent to the remainder of
Lot 2R, Block A80, Peck Addition with the hotel use, but the future restaurant use requires
a 10' Type F1 bufferyard. A Type F1 bufferyard is shown on the Site Plan, but the
Landscape Plan shows a 10'Type D bufferyard in that location. Please change the Type D
bufferyard to a Type F1 bufferyard on the Landscape Plan or add an S-P-2 regulation to
allow a Type D bufferyard with the future restaurant use and change the bufferyard on the
Site Plan and Landscape Plan to a Type D. A 5' Type A bufferyard is required and
provided adjacent to Lot 5,Block 1, Southlake Medical District.
c. Please add Note#9 on the Site Plan regarding maintenance of the Lot 2 landscaping and
irrigation to the Landscape Plan.
10. Please make the following changes regarding fencing and screening:
a. Provide a detail elevation of the screen wall around the pool area showing height and
materials.
b. An 8' solid fence meeting the requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section
39.6(a) is required along the southern property line that abuts property with residential
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 3
zoning. The 6' metal fence with masonry columns does not meet this requirement. An
S-P-2 regulation has been added to allow the 6' metal fence with masonry columns
instead of a solid 8' fence. Provide on center masonry column spacing with the fence
exhibits.
11. Please make the following changes to the elevations:
a. The property is in the Residential Adjacency Zone, so all facades must meet the vertical
and horizontal articulation requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended,
Section 43.13.a.4. The maximum fagade length without articulation is three times the
wall height. The predominant parapet height is approximately 74', so the maximum
facade length without articulation is approximately 222'. The articulation required is the
fifteen percent of the wall height, which is approximately 11.1' The north facade does
not meet the vertical articulation requirement. The fagade length without vertical
articulation is approximately 245'. The south facade does not meet the horizontal or
vertical articulation requirements. The fagade length without vertical or horizontal
articulation is approximately 258'. An S-P-2 regulation has been added to allow the
articulation as shown on the elevations.
b. In the material calculations, please sum the materials excluding windows and doors to
100% to demonstrate that each fagade meets the minimum 80% masonry requirement.
Please also add a note below the chart stating the percentage of glass on each fagade
to demonstrate that each fagade is below 50% glass and, therefore, a maximum of 10%
reflectance for the glass is not required.
c. Building height is measured to the top of the parapet. Please dimension the parapet
height on all elevations in addition to the parapet height label.
d. The Corridor Overlay Zone Section 43.9.c.1.e requires exposed structural support
columns to be constructed of, or clad in, the same masonry material as the principal
structure. The masonry shown on the support columns does not extend the full height
of the columns. A regulation has been added to allow a portion of the columns to not be
clad in or constructed of a masonry material.
12. The property is in the Residential Adjacency Zone. Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section
43.13.a.8 states that no non-single family residential building may encroach in the area above
a line having a slope of 4:1 from any single family residential property. The southwest corner of
the hotel is located approximately 85' from the single family residential property to the south,
which would limit the building height to approximately 21.25' at the corner. The height of the
roof at the southwest corner is approximately 71' 4". An S-P-2 regulation has been added to
allow the hotel to encroach into the 4:1 slope setback as shown on the plans. Add the 4:1
slope exhibit back to the plans submittal.
13. Show and label the width and type of surface for all pedestrian walks, malls, and open areas
for use by tenants or the public. Provide sidewalks and/or trails in compliance with the
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended and the Master Pathways Plan. The Master
Pathways Plan shows a <8' sidewalk on the east side of White Chapel Blvd. and a >8' multi-
use trail along the S.H. 114 frontage road. A 5' sidewalk is required along White Chapel Blvd.
and shown to be provided on Lot 1 with the development of the hotel. A 5' sidewalk is shown to
be provided in the future along the remaining portion of White Chapel Blvd. with the
development of Lot 2. An 8' multi-use trail will be required along the S.H. 114 frontage road
with the development of Lot 2.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 4
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. There is a 12" Sanitary Sewer in the northwest corner of the property that would cut directly thru
the trees proposed to be preserved in the northwest corner of the property. The proposed water
line should not have any effect on the trees. Show the proposed utilities on the Tree Conservation
Plan.
2. There is a proposed 30'Wide Temporary Construction Easement outside of the property along the
south and east property lines. The existing trees within the easement must be shown on the
proposed Tree Conservation Plan.
TEMPORARY ACCESS AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS:
a. A person commits an offense if the person owns real property and permits access across
the person's property or grants a temporary access or construction easement across the
owner's property if such right of access or easement intersects or comes within ten (10)
feet of the critical root zone of a protected tree.
b. It is a defense to prosecution for this offense that the Administrative Official determines
that an easement is the only reasonable means of access to the property being developed.
If so,the Administrative Official shall ensure that such an easement is of minimal size and
situated within a location designed to minimize tree damage and impact on the natural
environment while still providing a reasonable avenue of ingress and egress for
construction purposes to the adjoining property.
*. The submitted Tree Conservation Plan and proposed grading have been revised since the first
City Council Reading to show that the existing trees in the northwest corner of the development will
remain undisturbed during the Phase 1 construction of the development except for trash and brush
removal, and removal of low-quality and/or unhealthy trees.There is 11.69%of existing tree cover
on the site and if it was proposed to be straight zoning a minimum of 70% of that tree cover would
be required to be preserved.The applicant is proposing to preserve 16.77%, and remove 83.23%
during Phase I of the development.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance,a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover
that must be preserved under this section.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 5
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
reserved*
- 0% -20% 70%
20.1 —40% 60%
- 40.1% - 60% 50%
160.1% - 80% 40%
180.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan,Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district,the City Council shall consider the application
for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application
(as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application
and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall
approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as
to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature
tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE AND BUFFERYARDS COMMENTS:
1. The parking lot islands seem to be 12'wide from the outer face of the curb to the outer face of the
curb instead of back-of-curb to back-of-curb.The islands are required to be at least a minimum of
12' wide from back-of-curb to back-of-curb.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 6
2. On the Landscape Plan label the proposed bufferyards.
3. Within the Bufferyards Summary Chart the"Required"plant material for the East, South 1, South 2,
and South 3 bufferyards are incorrect. Provide the correct amount of required plant material for
each bufferyard designation within the "Required" portion of the summary chart.
Please consider providing some additional parking landscape island within the forty-two (42)
spaces along the rear of the property to break up the long row of parking and to provide some
shade within the parking area.
The remaining portion of the property is not under Site Plan review and approval at this time.
As each additional proposed building is brought in for Site Plan approval the required
landscaping will need to be provided and conform to the proposed concept landscape.
Bufferyards are required along all property lot lines including those internal to the development.
The applicant is requesting that no bufferyards be provided along internal lot lines.
Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan
must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake
especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to
prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly
recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one
map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during
vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to
the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and
removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction
plans.
3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet, if
applicable.
4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a
registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building
Inspections Department prior to construction.
5. Firelanes adjacent to buildings 6 stories or greater to be 26-feet wide firelanes.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 7
Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be
found in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
TIA:
1. The Parking Analysis is being reviewed by a 3rd party. Comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s).
Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 1, 10 and 100- year storm events.
Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. The Preliminary
Drainage Study indicates a more detailed analysis will be submitted with Civil Plans.
2. Or Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessarywill be required priorto
approval of construction plans.
Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets.
Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City
standards.
Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #9 and requires a fee to be paid prior to
beginning construction ($278.14/Acre).
Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
WATER COMMENTS:
1. Commercial and industrial developments require fire hydrant spacing of 300' maximum for non-
sprinkled buildings or 600' for sprinkled buildings.
The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc.
Meter sizes are 1", 2", 4", 6" and 8".
Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
1. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8". Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary
sewer system built to City standards.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 8
2. Clearly label all public and private sanitary sewer lines.
3. Extend sanitary sewer to the eastern/western/northern/southern property line and provide sewer
stub to adjacent property.
4. Add a note: Private sanitary sewer services need a plumbing permit and must be inspected by
building inspections prior to burial.
* Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City's website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines
pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH
114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans
directly to TxDOT for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817)
748-8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Any building where the floor level of the highest occupied floor is in excess of 55 feet above the
lowest level of fire department access will be considered a high-rise building in the 2015
International Fire Code. (Per, The City of Southlake amendments)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 9
The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant.
(FDC locations for all buildings not shown on plan) (Hydrants will need to be added as necessary
to meet the requirement)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Relocate/extend fire hydrant on the northwest corner of the Marriott property to be located
adjacent to the fire lane instead of within the parking lot.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the
perimeter of buildings on a "hose-lay' basis for sprinkled buildings, and within 150 feet of all
exterior portions of un-sprinkled buildings. Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather
surface, asphalt or concrete, a minimum of 26 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads
of fire apparatus. (A minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Adequate Fire Lane access not shown
for the six story building in the north-west corner of the complex)
Community Service/Parks Department Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
817-748-8607
pkaoa-ci.south Iake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting
fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for
further details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1)acre
of park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development.
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, non-residential park dedication fees in
the amount of$8000 per gross acre x 15.865 acres=$126,920.00 will be required. Fees will be collected
with the approved developer's agreement or prior to any permit being issued.
Pathway Comments:
Recommend crosswalks to be aligned closer to roadway intersections/entries so that stop signs and stop
bars can be located before pedestrian crosswalks. Potential safety hazard.
Other informational comments?
General Informational Comments
A SPIN meeting was held September 8, 2015.
No review or approval of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building
permit is required prior to construction of any signs.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 10
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No.605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones except as modified in the "S-P-2" regulations and Design Guidelines.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street
Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Emergency and Common Access Easements be recorded with the County prior to issuance of
a building permit for the construction of the driveways on Lot 2. A permit from TxDOT must be
obtained prior to any curb cut along S.H. 114.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-051 Page 11
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
11W 04501
ti, t's79
C4
Is
121
3W
F HiGHLAND s7—E
"IGHLAND ST
I F----,A A1' _ —
r77777n
SPO# Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 100 E SH 114 5.06 0
2. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 200 E SH 114 1.04 0
3. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 190 E SH 114 1.27 0
4. HOPKINS DALLAS PROPERTIES F
LTD 140 W SH 114 5
5. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 240 E SH 114 0.74 0
6. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE NR
PROPERTIES C3 101 E SH 114 0.40
7. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE NR
PROPERTIES C3 201 E SH 114 0.08
8. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE NR
PROPERTIES AG 1375 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.90
9. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE NR
PROPERTIES C3 1350 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 6.33
10. ADELKI LLC SP1 1360 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.51 0
11 BENGTSON PROPERTIES LLP SPI 1340 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.39 NR
2. WHITE CHAPEL VILLAGE CTR PRT 111W:: 1313 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD F
Case No. Attachment D
ZA1 6-051 Page 1
13. WHITE CHAPEL VILLAGE CTR PRT SF1-A 1227 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.09 NR
14. WHITE CHAPEL VILLAGE CTR PRT SF1-A 1241 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.36 NR
15. WHITE CHAPEL VILLAGE CTR PRT SF1-A 1205 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 2.04 NR
16. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 400 E SH 114 0.06 O
17. COUNTRYSIDE COURT LLC SPI 101 COUNTRYSIDE CT 2.40 NR
CULLUM CHALK&MCCAIN REAL
18. F
EST SP1 121 COUNTRYSIDE CT 2.40
19. HORIZON INVESTORS LLC SP2 245 W SH 114 3.59 NR
20. HORIZON INVESTORS LLC SP2 200 COUNTRYSIDE CT 2.57 NR
21 DOMINION SOUTHLAKE NR
PROPERTIES CS 1325 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 3.03
22 DOMINION SOUTHLAKE NR
PROPERTIES C3 301 E SH 114 2.70
23 DOMINION SOUTHLAKE NR
PROPERTIES C3 319 E SH 114 2.86
24. EYESOUTHLAKE PROPERTY LLC SPI 1310 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.57 NR
25. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 1700 N CARROLL AVE 20.94 O
26. SOUTHLAKE LAND HOLDINGS LP SP2 335 E SH 114 15.09 NR
27. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1200 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.81 NR
28. MCCOY, BARRY M AG 1250 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.06 NR
29. RUCKER, ZENA SULLIVAN AG 1300 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.56 NR
30. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 220 W HIGHLAND ST 0.18 NR
31. REC PROPERTIES LTD SPI 1320 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.43 NR
32. TERRA/HIGHLAND OAKS LLC RPUD 108 MONTROSE LN 0.36 NR
Notices Sent 1ST Mailout: Twenty (20)
Responses Received within 200': Two (2)-Attached
Notices Sent 2nd Mailout: Sixteen (16)
Responses Received within 200': Two (2) -Attached
Notices Sent 3rd Mailout: Twenty-one (21)
Responses Received within 200': Three (3) -Attached
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-051 Page 2
Responses from 1St Mailout
Notification Response Form
ZA f"51
Moating Date:August 1s, 2016 at 6.30 PITA
CULLUM CHALK&MCCAN IRFAI. FST
121 COUNTRYSIDE CT
SOUTHLAKE, Tx 76aa2
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s)of the property so noted above, are hereby
Mn favor of) opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Concert t Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your postdon:
Signatures-- Date:
Additional Signature: Date.
Printed Names): 11�r-r � - �-
1dfWM 6a pvp"awier(s)wFftn rreme[e;P an+ryrwftl nt tap fjllueMN!dor4tlK7 tkre Pw—%g!]m-ft e+k Ciro$m+per proPty-
Phone Number(opbonal)_
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-051 Page 3
Notification Response Form
ZA 16451
Meeting Date: August 18,2016 at 6-30 PM
HOPKINS DALLAS PROPERTIES LTD
790.5 L8J FWY STE 250
DALLAS, TX 75251
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX DR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline ane)
the proposed Zoning Change and Concept J Sita Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature: Date:
Additional Signature: „ Date.
Printed Name(s): t`9,-4,re Sr, . Y.P- &-f- (45 2r�2 .4's
Shuei he property awrer(a)whose name(s)ew printed at bp. OM IAN oohed Me filer M9 DOlrrlr WA, ONDi R W party.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-051 Page 4
Responses from 2nd Mailout
Notification Response Form
ZA16-a61
Meeting Dale- October G. 2016 at 6:30 PM
AdELKI LLC
13$0 N WHfTE CPL BLVD STE 100
SOUTHLAKE TX 76092
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s)of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor ofapposed to undecided about
OCT 3 2016 PM5:00
(circle or underline o a)--
the
)rthe proposed Zoning Change and Concept'1 Stte Plan referenced above)
Space for comments regarding your position: ty
40JV3Rx
!pa;&�' �Je-,)
O o
Signature: Date: _
Additional Signature: Date:
Printed Name(s):
Mist be Pv ty~w(s)whose nsn*z)wim prnfad wricip. Olnarwin contod ih*alennng papwlmwnf, oro farm Pur propomy.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-051 Page 5
WHITE CHAPEL VILLAGE CENTER PARTNERS LP
8231 East Prentice Avenue Greenwood Village,Colorado 80111
October 5, 2016
Via Email
Mr. Richard Schell
Principal Planner
City of Southlake
1400 Main St.,Suite 310
Southlake,Texas 76092
rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us
Re, Letter of Consent and Support(ZA16-051)
Richard,
On behalf of White Chapel Village Center Partners LP("Owner"),owner of the real property located at
1313 N.White Chapel Blvd.and immediately south of the property subject of the above referenced
zoning application(the"Application"),please accept this letter as a retard of Owner's consent and
support of all aspects of the Application,including the proposed use and site plan.
Please also note that,to the extent the current zoning of Owner's property(SF-1A)places additional
development standards on the subject property by virtue of the residential adjacency overlay or
otherwise,Owner further supports the proposed 5-P-1 regulations specifically deviating from those
standards. Owner's property is not currently developed with single-family residential uses and Owner
anticipates applying to rezone the property for commercial development in the future.
Please share this letter with the Planning and Zoning Commission,as well as the City Council, prior to
the upcoming October 6,2016,public hearing on the Application. Please let me know if you have any
questions regarding Owner's support of the Application.
Respectfully,
Ma4rRDeRose
Manager
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-051 Page 6
Responses from 3rd Mailout
Notification Response Form
ZAI"51
Meeting Date: Navember 3,2016 at 6!30 PM
HOPKINS DALLAS PROPERTIES LTD
7995 LBJ FWY STE 250
DALLAS TX 752.51-1249
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING,
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
n favo�of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Concept!Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature: Date:
Additional Signature: Date:
Pdnted Name(s): X4ok,.=_3._0,C451. a�-.��s 40W
Must tie xgmrty awim(e;wtme nime(s)arc P?lWd At tcp. OtiorWISO MAW the PT4nnPg rhrWIL Ona Aare p6fprope ly-
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-051 Page 7
Notification Response Form
ZA16-051
Meeting Date: November 3, 2016 at 6:30 PM
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP
2200 FOSS AVE STE 4200W
DALLAS TX 75201-2763
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
to favor ofo�dt� undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Charge and Concept 1 Site Plan referenced above
Space for comments regarding your position:
,w.: huh r s c�as�.
Signature Date: lo-Zr. 14
Additional Si ature: Date:
Printed Name(S): "aP46_ _
Must be property owner(a}whose narne(5;are phMed at top- Othervrsv cElf t ct the,Planning Department. One form par property
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-051 Page 8
Notification Response Form
ZA16-059
Meeting Date: November 3, 2016 at 6:30 PM
ADELKI LLC
1384 N WHITE CRL BLVD STE 100
SO THLAKE TX 70092-4329
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the ownerts) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of co
pvsr�d t undecided about
(circle or undedirtie one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Concept 1 Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
teASAGI C`v+ -6_51b^ rr
LT
Signature: Date: I Cfo
1 W
Additional Signature: Date:
Printed Name(s):
_ 4f�tsarm
%1LM be property owner{s)*hope nsrnees)we ontea st Dthecwiw contact the PlanningDe r pyopet[y�
Phone Number (optional).-
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-051 Page 9
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-720
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 3A2, 3A2B AND 3D, LARKIN H.
CHIVERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. A300, CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, LOTS 1A, 2A AND
3A, BLOCK 1, CHIVERS ADDITION, ORIGINALLY PLATTED AS
TRACTS 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 1, CHIVERS ADDITION, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, IN THE LARKIN H. CHIVERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
300, AND LOTS 1 AND A PORTION OF LOT 2R, BLOCK A80,
PECK ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 15.872
ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, "C-3"
GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "CS" COMMUNITY
SERVICE DISTRICT AND "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN
DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT/SITE
PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS
EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC
INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE
ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;
PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE
OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-051 Page 1
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and
to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural
District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District and "SF-M' Single
Family Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using
the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of
such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs
and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width
for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the
immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance
for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street
loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust;
effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the
over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,
water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-051 Page 2
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest
clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the
rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed
at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there
has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the
tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally
classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or
tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the
citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare
of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-051 Page 3
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is
hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,
changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Tracts 3A2, 3A2B and 3D, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract
No. A300, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, Lots 1A, 2A and 3A, Block 1,
Chivers Addition, originally platted as Tracts 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Chivers Addition,
an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, in the Larkin H.
Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, and Lots 1 and a portion of Lot 2R, Block A80,
Peck Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being
approximately 15.872 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit
"A" from "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District and
"SF-1A" Single Family Residential District to "S-P-2" Detailed Site Plan District as
depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit "B", and subject to the following conditions:
1 .
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance
are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan forthe purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-051 Page 4
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of
land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of
transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs
and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing
with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar
suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that
if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein
shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance
of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-051 Page 5
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,
and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation
of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the
official City newspaper one time within ten (10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required
by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1St reading the 15th day of November, 2016.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-051 Page 6
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2016.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-051 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being described as Tracts 3A2, 3A2B and 3D, Larkin H. Chivers Survey,Abstract No. A300, City
of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, Lots 1A, 2A and 3A, Block 1, Chivers Addition, originally
platted as Tracts 1 , 2 and 3, Block 1, Chivers Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, in the Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, and Lots 1 and a
portion of Lot 2R, Block A80, Peck Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas, being approximately 15.872acres and being more particularly described as follows:
Metes and Bounds Description
Reserved for metes and bounds description
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-051 Page 8
EXHIBIT "B"
Reserved for approved Site Plan
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-051 Page 9