Item 7BCase No.
ZA16-057
S T A F F R E P O R T
October 26, 2016
CASE NO: ZA16-057
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for Southlake Commons EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Tres Burros, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for
Southlake Commons on property described as Tract 3C, Hiram Granberry
Survey, Abstract No. 581 and Tract 1A, Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No.
686, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and addressed as 130 S
White Chapel Blvd, Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #10.
DETAILS: The project is generally located near the SW corner of W Southlake Blvd and S
White Chapel Blvd. The purpose of this item is to receive zoning and site plan
approval to rezone an approximately 7.5 acre property from “O-1” Office District
to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow construction of three single-story
retail commercial buildings and five single-story office buildings totaling 51,638
square feet.
Site Data Summary
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA16-057
The three proposed retail commercial buildings are single-story and clad in
stucco, brick and stone veneer which meets the Residential and Corridor
Overlay standards. Each façade contains a minimum 80% masonry which
meets the Masonry Ordinance (the lowest percentage of masonry on any
façade is 87%). Building 3 utilizes a drive-thru window on the east façade facing
toward First Financial Bank.
The five office buildings are single-story and clad in brick and cast stone with a
large format brick wainscot designed to simulate the look of stone. Each façade
contains 100% masonry. All buildings are single-story and comply with C-2 and
O-1 district height regulations. The buildings adjacent to the Stratford Parc
neighborhood to the south are designed as 20’ single-story buildings setback
40’ from the property line and comply with the height, setback and 4:1 slope
regulations of the Residential Adjacency Overlay per Section 43.13.a.8.
VARIANCES
REQUESTED: The applicant requests two variances in conjunction with this request:
DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS: The proposed development generally follows the regulations and uses allowed
in the “C-2” district with limited retail uses allowed in buildings 1-3 along
Southlake Boulevard and “O-1” office uses allowed in buildings 4-8 which are
adjacent to residential.
Several topics were discussed at the October 20th Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting with regard to this proposal, including parking, noise
buffering, the function of the drive thru on building 3, and visual buffering of the
parking lot and trash enclosure along Southlake Blvd.
The following chart summarizes the action items in the Planning Commission’s
motion and the applicant’s response to those items:
Current Regulation Request
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended,
Section 8.01A, Every lot shall abut on a
public street or a private street.
Variance allowing relief from the
Subdivision Regulation that all lots have
frontage on a public street, provided
Common Access Easements are
implemented, allowing permanent and
proper access to all lots.
Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Section 5.2.d,
A driveway shall require a minimum 100’ of
stacking distance if the average number of
parking spaces per driveway falls within 50
and 199 parking spaces and the total amount
of parking exceeds 200.
Variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634,
as amended, Section 5.2(d) regarding
stacking depth, to a minimum 77’, for the
entrance from FM-1709/Southlake Blvd.,
and to allow the site to be served by the
existing drives to and from the adjacent
properties.
Case No.
ZA16-057
ACTION ITEM APPLICANT’S RESPONSE
Evaluate removing a potential number of
parking spaces to enhance the site’s green
spaces and landscape/noise buffer.
Parking regulation revised to 1 space per
135 square feet (total parking unchanged).
Additional landscape in several places to
enhance the green spaces.
Patios will not be shown on the southern sides
of lots 1 and 2.
The plan only shows patios between
Buildings 1 & 2 (East and West sides), and
the eastern side of Building 2.
An enhanced landscaping will be considered on
the eastern side of lot 2. Considerable plant material has been added
in this area.
The triangle shaped open space piece on the
site will be evaluated for additional landscaping
to enhance the noise buffer
A significant number of additional trees
have been added to this area.
The applicant will be willing to take over repair
and maintenance of the fence on the southern
boundary of the site.
Agreed.
Evaluate a berm or landscaping in front of the
parking spaces that are on the southern side of
1709 directly.
As there are existing trees we are trying to
save in that area, we feel a berm would not
be advisable, however, we have added
several trees in that area to the Landscape
Plan, and there is also a continuous
evergreen hedge which will be planted to
screen the parking.
Evaluate enhanced landscaping around the
dumpster area that fronts 1709. Several evergreen “Nellie R. Stevens”
hollies, which will grow to at least the height
of the screen wall, have been added in front
of that dumpster enclosure, to complement
the screening hedge along its perimeter.
Evaluate the drive thru regulations and tighten
up those regulations accordingly. The Development Regulations have been
revised to clear up exactly what is allowed
and not allowed in the building using the
drive-thru facility.
Reducing the permitted uses under O-1 zoning
by eliminating “call centers”. This regulation has been added to the
Development Regulations.
Reducing the permitted uses under C-2 zoning
per Planning Commission’s motion Each of these uses has been added to the
Regulations as “not allowed” uses.
Case No.
ZA16-057
The applicant has proposed the following regulations to govern the proposed
“S-P-1” district:
Development Regulations
This property shall be subject to the development regulations for the “C-2”,
Local Retail Commercial District, and all other applicable regulations with the
following exceptions:
1) The following C-2 uses shall not be allowed:
a. Antique Shops;
b. Business Colleges or Private Schools;
c. Cigar or Tobacco Stores;
d. Dancing Schools;
e. Day Nurseries;
f. Dog and Cat Hospitals or Small Animal Hospitals;
g. Dry Goods or Notion Stores;
h. Duplicating Services for Printing and Lithographing;
i. Frozen Food Lockers for Individual or Family Use;
j. Grocery Stores and/or Meat Markets;
k. Radio and Television Sales and Servicing;
l. Shoe Repair Services;
m. Gun Sales and Repair Stores;
n. Tires, Batteries and Automotive Accessory Sales;
o. Variety Stores;
2) A drive-thru facility shall be allowed, on Lot 3 as indicated on the
Site Plan, and shall service a Coffee/Beverage type establishment,
or – with SUP approval – a “Fast Casual” type restaurant. By way of
example but not limited to this list, the following restaurant brands
are considered “Fast Casual”: Corner Bakery, Panera Bread,
Jason’s Deli, Chipotle Mexican Grill, La Madeleine, and Red Robin.
No “Fast Food” establishments shall be allowed. By way of example,
but not limited to this list, the following restaurant brands are
considered fast food: McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Burger King,
Whataburger, KFC & Taco Bell.
3) Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 are limited to the “O-1 Office” Permitted Uses,
with the following exceptions, which are not allowed:
a. Banking
b. Billpaying services;
c. Employment services;
d. Radio and Television Broadcasting Studios requiring any
outside antenna towers;
e. Savings and Loan;
f. Duplication and Mailing Services;
g. Travel Bureaus;
h. Call Centers;
4) Minimum Front Building Setbacks
a. Along Southlake Blvd. shall be forty-five (45’) feet.
b. Along S. White Chapel Blvd. shall be thirty (30’) feet.
Case No.
ZA16-057
5) Minimum Side Building Setbacks shall be fifteen (15’) feet, except
that setbacks along internal property lines shall not be required.
6) Minimum Rear Buildings Setbacks shall be fifteen (15’) feet, except
that setbacks along internal property lines shall not be required.
7) In addition, a Minimum Building Setback from any property currently
zoned as Single-Family Residential, shall be forty (40’) feet.
8) Buffer Yards along internal lot lines shall not be required.
9) The maximum impervious coverage for the overall “SP-1” boundary
shall be 70%; however, the maximum impervious coverage
requirement shall not apply to individual lots within the boundary.
10) A shared parking, cross-access easement and shared maintenance
agreement shall be required. Required parking for all built uses shall
be provided within the “SP-1” boundary; parking requirements for
individual lots shall not apply.
11) Parking Space Requirements:
All Uses: One (1) space for each one-hundred thirty-five (135)
square feet of Net Leasable area.
12) Maximum Building Height:
Buildings on Lots 4, 5 & 6 are restricted to one story, and shall not
exceed twenty-five (25’) feet in height.
13) Dumpster Enclosure Location:
Dumpster enclosures shall be permitted as shown on the Site Plan.
14) Patio Shade Structures (e.g. Pergola or Trellis) on the patio areas
adjacent to buildings on Lots 1 & 2, as indicated on Site Plan, shall
be allowed to overlap the internal lot boundary.
Case No.
ZA16-057
To date, opposition has been received in excess of 20%. If approved at 1st
reading, this application would require a vote in favor by a supermajority of
Council for 2nd reading approval.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Consider 1st Reading Approval of Zoning Change and Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 26, 2016
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map
Link to Property Owner Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-721
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative and “S-P-1” Regulations
Link to Plans
Page 1 - Site Plan
Pages 2-7 - Building Elevations and Renderings
Page 8 - Landscape Plan
Page 9 - Tree Conservation Plan
Link to Traffic Impact Analysis
Link to TIA Review Comments
Link to Noise Assessment
Link to SPIN meeting report
Link to 2035 Corridor Committee Meeting Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
David Jones (817) 748-8070
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-057 Page 7
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Gloria Lechler Trust, et al
APPLICANT: Tres Burros, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: Located near the SW corner of W Southlake Blvd and S White Chapel
Blvd and addressed as 130 S White Chapel Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 3C, Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581 and Tract 1A,
Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, in the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, approx 7.5 acres
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: “O-1” Office District
PROPOSED ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with limited “C-2” and “O-1” uses
HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the Town of Southlake in 1956 as “AG”
(Ord. No. 041).
- The "O-1" Office District zoning was placed on the property with
approval of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 on September 19, 1989.
- A Plat Showing for Lot 4, H. Granberry No. 581 Addition for Southlake
Baptist Church adjacent to this property was approved in February 1994
(ZA93-87).
- A Preliminary Plat which included this lot under the name Medical
Villas at Taylor Creek was approved by City Council October 2007
(ZA07-057).
- A Final Plat for Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Medical Villas at Tuscan Creek
adjacent to this property was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission February 2009 (ZA07-155).
- A Final Plat of Tract 3C01 in the Hiram Granbury Survey for Lot 1,
Block 1, First Financial Bank adjacent to this property was approved by
City Council October 2010 (ZA10-038).
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2030 future land use designation for
the site is Office Commercial which is
defined in the Southlake 2030 plan as
follows:
OFFICE COMMERCIAL Purpose
and Definition: “The Office
Commercial category is a
commercial category designed and
intended for the exclusive use of office and limited office-related
activities. It is established for and will be allocated to those districts
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-057 Page 8
best suited for supporting commercial activity of an office character.
It has been established to encourage and permit general
professional and business offices of high quality and appearance, in
attractive landscaped surroundings with the types of uses and
design exterior appearance so controlled as to be generally
compatible with existing and future adjacent and surrounding
residential development. Properties with this designation may serve
as a transition between established residential neighborhoods,
major roadways, and retail development. Other suitable activities
are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and
Public/Semi-Public categories”.
The applicant is proposing a change to
Retail Commercial for retail commercial
portion of the property (Lots 1, 2 & 3).
Retail Commercial is defined in the
Southlake 2030 plan as follows:
RETAIL COMMERCIAL Purpose
and Definition: “The Retail
Commercial category is a lower- to medium-intensity commercial
category providing for neighborhood-type retail shopping facilities
and general commercial support activities. It is intended to provide
limited local retail and/or office uses which serve neighborhoods in
close proximity. It is intended that all uses in this category will be
compatible with adjacent single family uses, thereby maintaining
the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. This category
is intended to encourage comprehensively planned developments.
In areas where the Retail Commercial designation is adjacent to
residentially zoned properties or areas with a residential
designation on the Land Use Plan, lower intensity activities such as
office or office-related uses should be planned adjacent to the
residential uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the
Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, and Office
Commercial categories previously discussed.”
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows an existing multi-use trail along W
Southlake Blvd adjacent to the site and a future sidewalk along S White
Chapel Blvd adjacent to the site. The applicant proposes a connection
from the multi-use path to Lot 3 and a 5’ extension of the sidewalk along
White Chapel with a connection to Lot 8.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The site has direct access to W Southlake Blvd, an A6D arterial with a
minimum 130’ to 140’ of right of way and indirect access to S White
Chapel Blvd, an A2U arterial with a minimum 88’ of right of way. No
right of way is proposed to be dedicated with this development.
Retail
Commercial
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-057 Page 9
F.M. 1709/Southlake Blvd (17)
(Between White Chapel and Shady Oaks)
24hr West Bound (25,385) East Bound (27,182)
AM Peak AM (1456)11:45AM–12:45PM Peak AM (2887) 7:00-8:00 AM
PM Peak PM (2638) 4:45-5:45PM Peak PM (1825)1:00-2:00PM
White Chapel Blvd (57)
(Between F.M. 1709 and Continental)
24hr North Bound (4,724) South Bound (4,857)
AM Peak AM (561)7:30AM–8:30PM Peak AM (315) 7:30-8:30AM
PM Peak PM (354) 5:00–6:00PM Peak PM (484)4:15–5:15PM
* Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted for this project.
Link to TIA
Link to TIA Review Letter
TREE PRESERVATION: There is approximately 6.3% existing tree cover on the site. Tree
Preservation Ordinance 585-D requires that 70% of the existing canopy
be preserved. The applicant has submitted a Tree Conservation Plan
that shows preservation of 75.16% of existing tree cover with an
additional 5.11% shown as marginal.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a
planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-
2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council
shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in
conjunction with the corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the
application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along
rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in
the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree
replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-057 Page 10
UTILITIES: Water
There is an existing 12” water line along Southlake Blvd that will serve
this property.
Sewer
There is an existing 8” sanitary sewer line along the south property line
that will serve this property.
DRAINAGE: Drainage with generally sheet flow south and west to storm inlets
proposed on the property and from there be piped to the existing facility
on the Villas of Tuscan Creek property.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on July 26, 2016 (SPIN16-20)
Link to SPIN Report
This proposal was presented at the March 21, 2016 Corridor
Planning Committee meeting
Link to Corridor Committee Report
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: October 20, 2016; voted 4-0 to recommend approval of this item subject
to Staff Report dated October 14, 2016 and Site Plan Review Summary
#3 dated October 14, 2016 specifically granting the two variances noted
within the staff report and also noting the following:
Noting the applicant’s willingness to evaluate removing a
potential number of parking spaces to enhance the site’s green
spaces and landscape/noise buffer;
Patios will not be shown on the southern sides of lots 1 and 2;
An enhanced landscaping will be considered on the eastern
side of lot 2;
The triangle shaped open space piece on the site will be
evaluated for additional landscaping to enhance the noise
buffer;
The applicant will be willing to take over repair and maintenance
of the fence on the southern boundary of the site;
The applicant’s willingness to evaluate a berm or landscaping in
front of the parking spaces that are on the southern side of 1709
directly;
Applicant’s willing ness to evaluate enhanced landscaping
around the dumpster area that fronts 1709;
Applicant’s willingness to evaluate the drive thru regulations and
tighten up those regulations accordingly;
Reducing the permitted uses under O-1 zoning by eliminating
“call centers”;
Also reducing the permitted uses under C-2 zoning by
eliminating permitted use #3 “Antique shops”, #8 “Business
colleges or private schools”, #9 “Cigar or tobacco stores”, #13
“Dancing schools”, #14 “Day nurseries”, #16 “Dog and cat
hospitals or small animal hospitals”, #18 “Dry goods and notion
stores”, #19 “Duplicating services for printing and lithographing”,
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-057 Page 11
#22 “Frozen food lockers for individual or family use”, #23
“Grocery stores and/or meat markets without size limitations”,
#29 “Radio and television sales and servicing”, #31 “Shoe repair
services”, part of #32 referencing “gun sales and repair”, #34
“Tires, batteries and automotive accessory sales” and #35
“Variety stores”.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 26,
2016
Criteria for variance from the Subdivision Ordinance:
Sec. 9.01 Modifications and Variations:
A. Compliance: Where the Council finds that compliance with these
regulations would cause unusual hardship or extraordinary
difficulties because of exceptional and unique conditions of access,
location, shape, size, drainage, or other physical features of the site,
the requirements may be modified to mitigate the hardship, provided
that the public interest is protected and the development is in
keeping with the general spirit and intent of this ordinance.
1. This section shall not be interpreted to permit the development of
land which is inherently unsuitable for the use proposed.
2. Any modification will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the
provisions of this ordinance.
B. Discretion of Council: At the discretion of the Council, the normal
standards and requirements of this ordinance may also be modified
in the case of a Planned Unit Development. Such departures from
the standards specified may be made only when the Council finds
that the plan provides for convenience and safe access, adequate
space for recreation, and provision for light and air, and offers all
essential utility services and necessary public and other facilities,
and is in conformance with all provisions of the City Code which
specifically apply to Planned Unit Development.
Variance Approval Criteria for Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Article 8.2:
Variances – The City Council shall have the authority to grant a
variance to this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City
Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the
regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship or practical
difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing unnecessary
hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property
and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be
wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of
adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in
harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The
decision of the City Council shall be final.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-057 Page 12
General
Development
Standards
Applies? Comments
Overlay Regulations Yes Subject to requirements of Residential Adjacency Overlay
Building Articulation Yes Subject to requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Sec. 43
Requirement Met
Masonry Standards Yes Subject to requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Sec. 43
Requirement Met
Impervious Coverage Yes Not to exceed 70% of total lot area per proposed “S-P-1”
regulations Requirement Met
Bufferyards Yes
Subject to requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Sec. 42
Requirement Met along perimeter boundaries. Not required
on internal lot boundaries per proposed S-P-1 Regulations
Interior Landscape Yes Subject to requirements of Landscape Ordinance No. 544-B
(Section 3.3) Requirement Met
Tree Preservation Yes Subject to requirements of Tree Preservation Ordinance No.
585-D Requirement Met
Sidewalks Yes
Required per Pathways Master Plan
Existing >8’ sidewalk along Southlake Blvd. Proposed <8’
sidewalk along S White Chapel Blvd
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-057 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-057 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA16-057 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 10/26/16
Project Name: Zoning Change and Site Plan – Southlake Commons
APPLICANT: James C. Shindler OWNER: John Stephen (Steve) Church
Tres Burros, LLC Gloria Lechler Trust, et al
260 Miron Dr, Ste 108 4116 H.C. Meacham Blvd
Southlake, Texas 76092 Fort Worth, Texas 76135-9574
Phone: 817-552-7778; Fax: 817-552-7788 Phone: 817-707-6855; Fax: 888-702-6844
Email: Jim@ConiferRE.com Email: stvfwt@aeiwireless.net
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/25/16 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER.
Planning Review
David Jones, AICP
Principal Planner
Phone: (817) 748-8070
Email:djones@ci.southlake.tx.us
1. Per Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01A, every lot shall abut on a
public street or a private street. (A variance has been requested)
2. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Section 5.2.d, A driveway shall require a minimum 100’ of
stacking distance if the average number of parking spaces per driveway falls within 50 and
199 parking spaces and the total amount of parking exceeds 200. (A variance has been
requested)
3. Due to height restrictions imposed by the Residential Overlay, staff recommends amending
regulation 12 to say that buildings on Lots 4, 5 & 6 are restricted to one story, and shall not
exceed twenty (20’) feet in height.
4. Per Section 33.6.c, a roof eave may project no further than 30” into a required yard. Provide a
calculation showing the encroachment on the south office building face into the 40’ rear yard.
5. Per comment #1 under “Landscaping Comments” below, staff recommends including a
regulation in the S-P-1 document which states that distribution of interior landscaping shall be
as shown on the approved site plan.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-057 Page 2
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* The development is proposed to be zoned SP-1 but the existing tree cover preservation
complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation
Ordinance. There is approximately 6.30% of existing tree cover on the site and a minimum of
70% is would be required to be preserved. 24.84% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be
either removed or as marginal, and 75.16% is proposed to be preserved.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of
existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the
minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City
Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer
residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-057 Page 3
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction
of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved
on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and
the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all
structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be
constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. A minimum of 75% of all required interior landscape area and plant material within the interior
landscape areas shall be in the front and along either side of the building between the building
and the interior edge of the required bufferyards and a portion thereof shall be placed adjacent
to the building where practical.
* Upon submission to obtain a Building Permit, the proposed Landscape Plan must be prepared
by a Registered Landscape Architect.
* Lot 5 is deficient 142 square feet in provided interior landscape area, but other lots have
additional landscape area provided above the minimum required.
* Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for some of the required bufferyard and interior
landscape canopy trees. Please ensure that all existing tree taken credits for are in healthy
condition and can be properly preserved throughout the construction process. Existing tree
credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the
Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a
Permanent Certificate of Occupancy.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Public Works/Engineering Review
Om Gharty Chhetri, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8089
E-mail: ochhetri@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-057 Page 4
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. Shared driveway access agreement with adjoining properties shall be in place.
3. Refer to TIA review comments by Lee Engineering on TIA study.
* Construction within FM 1709 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
* Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
* Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be
found in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. The proposed dumpsters encroaches the drainage/sewer/water easements. An encroachment
agreement shall be in place before the final acceptance of the project. Any permanent structure
within easement will require an agreement.
* Based on review and research, it was found that the report prepared by Aqua Terra for
Medical Villas at Taylor Creek analyzed the fully developed condition of the watershed and
sized the downstream facilities to accept and convey the fully developed flows. Therefore, the
requirement of detention is waived.
* The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1” inch meter must have a 1” tap, etc.
* Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
* All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be
constructed to City standards. Cement treated sand (CTS) backfill above the public utilities
and underneath the proposed pavement applies.
* Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City
standards.
* Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure and requires a fee to be paid prior to
beginning construction.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-057 Page 5
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines
pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* Improvements within TxDOT Right of way requires TxDOT approval.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817)
748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Community Services Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
Phone: (817) 748-8607
E-mail: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if
requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817)
748-8607 for further details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1)
acre of park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development.
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, non-residential park dedication
fees in the amount of $8000 per gross acre x 7.501 acres= $60,008.00 will be required. Fees will be
collected with the approved developer’s agreement and prior to any permit being issued.
Pathway Comments:
If grading and clearances allow, recommend providing a back-of-curb pathway along the west side of
the Southlake Boulevard entrance in lieu of east side of entry to eliminate a crosswalk. Pathway
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-057 Page 6
connection to Building 5 not clearly shown at peninsula.
Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide
pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings.
Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with
Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas
accessibility requirements.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
No comments based on submitted information.
_________________________________________________________________________________
General Informational Comments:
* Prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat
Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must
be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be
limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap
Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* This development must comply with Residential Adjacency and Corridor Overlay Regulations,
Section 43.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. 321 SOUTHLAKE BLVD REAL ESTATE O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.128 NR
2. ATCC INVESTMENTS LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.272 NR
3. BICENTENNIAL FIN CENTER LP SP2 250 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.166 NR
4. DAVIS, KEITH SF20A 101 LONDONBERRY TER 0.514 O
5. FIRST AMERICAN SAVINGS BANC SP2 222 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.168 NR
6. FIRST FINANCIAL BANK O1 151 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.619 NR
7. GHIA, JAYESH SF20A 124 LONDONBERRY TER 0.512 O
8. HOFFMAN, HOLLY L SF20A 100 LONDONBERRY TER 0.909 O
9. IMAN, ASHER S O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.160 NR
10. KESTER, PAIGE A SF20A 116 LONDONBERRY TER 0.197 O
11. LAW, TIFFANY SF20A 105 LONDONBERRY TER 0.482 O
12. LECHLER, GLORIA ETAL O1 130 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.474 F
13. LUTHY, ROBERT E SF20A 104 LONDONBERRY TER 7.345 O
14. MAHALO INVESTMENTS LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.460 NR
15. MAHALO INVESTMENTS LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.343 NR
16. MURPHY, TYLER C SF20A 108 LONDONBERRY TER 1.628 O
17. NMEM LTD SP1 190 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.478 NR
18. O'DONNELL, PETER SF20A 120 LONDONBERRY TER 0.950 O
19. PARKHILL & WRIGHT LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.472 NR
20. PARKHILL & WRIGHT LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.136 NR
21. RAI, ROHIT SF20A 300 SIR JOHNS CT 0.457 O
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 2
22. SIMON, ANDREA H SF20A 109 LONDONBERRY TER 0.547 O
23. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 300 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 10.292 NR
24. STEDKE REVOCABLE TRUST SF20A 112 LONDONBERRY TER 0.493 O
25. SUNTREE STATION LLC SP2 110 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.903 NR
26. SUNTREE STATION LLC SP2 100 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 7.735 NR
27. TY SHAFER DDS PA O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.259 NR
28. WHITE'S CHAPEL CEMETERY CS 121 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.724 NR
29. WHITE'S CHAPEL METH CH CS 185 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 24.382 NR
30. Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR
31. Superintendent of Grapevine
Colleyville ISD NR
32. Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR
33. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Twenty-Nine (29)
Responses Received: Eleven (11) Opposed; One (1) In Favor
Link to Property Owner Responses
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 3
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-721
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS TRACT 3C, HIRAM GRANBERRY SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 581 AND TRACT 1A, LITTLEBERRY G. HALL
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 686, APPROXIMATELY 7.5 ACRES
FROM “O-1” OFFICE DISTRICT TO “S-P-1” DETAILED SITE
PLAN DISTRICT WITH “C-2” LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL
DISTRCT AND “O-1” OFFICE DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED
ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS
ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the lo cation and
use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other
purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public
health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 4
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “O-1” Office
District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called
by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether
these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians
using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and station ary lights and
effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types
of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and
adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use
around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by
requirements of this ordinance for off -street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress
points for parking and off -street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing
on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health a nd the general welfare;
effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of
population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered
among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitabil ity for particular
uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most
appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 5
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public
interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably
invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the
classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the
changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic,
and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and
air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and
facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and
other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that
there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined
that there has been a change in the conditions of the prop erty surrounding and in close
proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land
were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning
classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best
interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote
the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and
amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 6
be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below:
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 7
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 8
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described
shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing
sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning
Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and
affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein estab lished have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to
both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable
future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -
crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and
complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the
district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the
value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the
community.
SECTION 5.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 9
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except
in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and
that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described
herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of
the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and,
as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civi l and criminal, whether
pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance
but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 10
public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second read ing of this ordinance,
and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any
violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this
ordinance in the official City newspaper one tim e within ten (10) days after passage of this
ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 1ST day of November 2016.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 15th day of November 2016.
________________________________
MAYOR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 11
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 12
EXHIBIT “A”
Being a tract of land out of the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581 and the L. Hall Survey,
Abstract No. 686 and situated in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and surveyed by Miller
Surveying, Inc. of Hurst, Texas in June of 2016, said tract being a portion of the same tract of land
described in the deed to Gloria Jeanne Lechler, John Stephen Church and Niley Monroe Church
recorded in Volume 9779, Page 2371 in the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more
particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
Beginning at a 1/2 inch "MILLER 5665" capped steel rod set in the southerly right-of-way line of
Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), said rod being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, First Financial
Bank Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded as
Document No. D210267208 in the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas;
Thence South 07 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds East with the westerly boundary line of said Lot 1 a
distance of 247.31 feet to a 1/2 inch "MILLER 5665" capped steel rod set for the southwest corner
thereof;
Thence South 89 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East with the southerly boundary line of said Lot 1
a distance of 242.93 feet to a 5/8 inch steel rod with cap stamped “MSI RPLS 4224” found for the
southeast corner thereof, said rod being in the westerly right-of-way line of White’s Chapel Road and
also being in a curve to the right with a radius of 546.50 feet and whose chord bears South 09
degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West at 145.06 feet;
Thence southerly with said westerly right-of-way line and with said curve along an arc length of
145.49 feet to a 1/2 inch "MILLER 5665" capped steel rod set for the beginning of a curve to the left
with a radius of 1146.50 feet and whose chord bears South 17 degrees 52 minutes 00 seconds West
at 13.21 feet;
Thence southerly continuing with said westerly right-of-way line and with said curve along an arc
length of 13.21 feet to a 1/2 inch "MILLER 5665" capped steel rod set in the northerly boundary line of
Lot 4, H. Granberry No. 581 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat
thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1628 of said Plat Records;
Thence South 89 degrees 35 minutes 20 seconds West with said northerly boundary line a distance
of 292.98 feet to a 3/4 inch steel rod found for the northwest corner of said Lot 4;
Thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 23 seconds West with the westerly boundary line of said Lot 4 a
distance of 150.19 feet to a 1/2 inch "MILLER 5665" capped steel rod set for the southwest corner of
said Lot 4, said rod being in the northerly boundary line of Stratfort Parc, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 9334 of said Plat Records;
Thence South 89 degrees 31 minutes 45 seconds West with the northerly boundary line of said
Stratfort Park a distance of 518.91 feet to a 1/2 inch "MILLER 5665" capped steel rod set;
Thence North 00 degrees 36 minutes 37 seconds West, passing at 1.13 feet a 1/2 inch steel rod
found for the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Medical Villas at Tuscan Creek, an addition to the
City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded as Document No. D210020733 of said
Plat Records and continuing with the easterly boundary line thereof a total distance of 449.18 feet to a
1/2 inch capped steel rod found for the northeast corner of said Lot 2, said rod being in said southerly
right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard;
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 13
Thence North 81 degrees 10 minutes 10 seconds East with said southerly right-of-way line a distance
of 53.09 feet to a 1/2 inch "MILLER 5665" capped steel rod set;
Thence North 77 degrees 08 minutes 35 seconds East continuing with said southerly right-of-way line
a distance of 386.97 feet to a 1/2 inch "MILLER 5665" capped steel rod set;
Thence North 82 degrees 41 minutes 48 seconds East continuing with said southerly right-of-way line
a distance of 141.01 feet to the point of beginning and containing 7.501 acres of land, more or less.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-057 Page 14
EXHIBIT “B”
Reserved for City Council approved plans