Item 5 & 6 TIA Amendment® Stantec
To: Carl Schwab
RREAF Real Estate & Note
Acquisition
4245 N. Central Expressway Suite 420
Dallas, Texas 75205
Memo
From: Carl LaFerney, P.E., PTOE, MBA
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
2435 N. Central Expressway Suite 750
Richardson, Texas 75080-2793
Date: July 18, 2016
Reference: White Chapel Village Memorandum
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. has been retained by RREAF Real Estate & Note Acquisitions to
provide a professional opinion of the impact on adding 20 rooms to the hotel within the proposed
White Chapel Village site, located southwest of the interchange of SH 114 and White Chapel
Boulevard in Southlake, TX. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) previously performed by Stantec for White
Chapel Village was submitted on October 22, 2015. The TIA included the proposed hotel as the
Phase 1 build -out of the site, with the remaining land uses being built in the final build -out. A horizon
year of five years was also part of the TIA. This memo provides a qualitative analysis of the trip
generation and distribution of the additional hotel rooms and a professional opinion as to whether
additional traffic improvements would be required.
2.0 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
Generating traffic for proposed developments is typical based on information in Trio Generation, 91h
Edition, 2012 and the Trio Generation Handbook. 2nd edition, 2004, developed by the Institute of
Traffic Engineer (ITE). The rates and equations in these reports were applied to the development to
determine the anticipated trips generated from the development where applicable. The trip
generation comparison between the previous TIA and the revised hotel with additional rooms is
shown in Table 1. The trip generation analysis can be found in Appendix A.
Table 1: Trip Generation Comparison
The hotel as part of the previously -submitted TIA included 220 rooms. After approval from the City of
Southlake, the hotel size increased to 240 rooms. The revision would add no more than six trips
inbound or outbound during either peak hour.
Design with community In mind
Ic v:\1981\business development\neat\198110111\memo work\memo\hip gen revision memo - fnel.dou
Hotel
AM Peak
Trips
PM Peak
Trips I
Rooms
In
Out
In
Out
Previous White Chapel Villaqe TIA Submission
220
69
48
67
65
Revised Trip Generation
240
75_
52
73
71
Change 't`°
+20
+6
+4
+6
+6
The hotel as part of the previously -submitted TIA included 220 rooms. After approval from the City of
Southlake, the hotel size increased to 240 rooms. The revision would add no more than six trips
inbound or outbound during either peak hour.
Design with community In mind
Ic v:\1981\business development\neat\198110111\memo work\memo\hip gen revision memo - fnel.dou
5 Stantec
July 18, 2016
Carl Schwab
Page 2 of 4
Reference: White Chapel Village Memorandum
The trip distribution for the revised hotel matched the external and internal trip distribution for the
project site in the previous TIA submission. The resulting volumes were calculated for each of the
study intersections from the previous TIA. The change in volume due to the added hotel rooms is
shown in Figure 1. As can be seen in the figure, the change in volume would not exceed three
vehicles per hour at any of the turning movements for each of the study intersections, during either
peak hour.
Design with community in mind
Ic v:\1981\business development\neaf\1981 10111 \memo work\memo\Mp gen revision memo - final.docx
`r Stantec
July 18, 2016
Carl Schwab
Page 3 of 4
Reference: White Chapel Village Memorandum
Figure 1: Added Hotel Traffic Volumes
AM (PM)
Onramp to
SH 114
I (1)y
SH 114 EBFR
n o o =
m o f o oI —
_ m J 1 Drwy #1
0(0)1 to(1)
o (o) , T o (o)
D (0) - I j 2 (3)
Business t a — a
Park o iv _ a m
Drwy o N U
AM (PM) ------- AM (PM)
10
DAM
SH 114 EBFRAM (PM)
Design with community in mind
Ic v:\1981\business tlevelopment\neai\198110111 \memo work\memo\hip gen revision memo - final.docx
m'zo
p^
I0I
119 /r Y
SH 114 WBFR
�a(o,
1 (11 v
�o 0
o (o) 1
�, nl
1 (� ?' a a
4 2121
�T
= o
- o
-
t o v
�Um
AM (PM)
n o o =
m o f o oI —
_ m J 1 Drwy #1
0(0)1 to(1)
o (o) , T o (o)
D (0) - I j 2 (3)
Business t a — a
Park o iv _ a m
Drwy o N U
AM (PM) ------- AM (PM)
10
DAM
SH 114 EBFRAM (PM)
Design with community in mind
Ic v:\1981\business tlevelopment\neai\198110111 \memo work\memo\hip gen revision memo - final.docx
AM (PM)
of oc�o
Highland St
0 (D)1'L 0 (D)
o(o),.-o(o)
o(o)h+ r0(0)
Highland St T z n'
o M o O
AM (PM)
n o
m o f o —
a=� d l
01011
o lo»
Counhyside 1 z ry a
Crto 3Lm
o U
Oe
n p A
p^
o coli
1 (11 v
o (o) 1
SH 114 EBFR
1 (� ?' a a
nm
n � o
AM (PM)
of oc�o
Highland St
0 (D)1'L 0 (D)
o(o),.-o(o)
o(o)h+ r0(0)
Highland St T z n'
o M o O
AM (PM)
n o
m o f o —
a=� d l
01011
o lo»
Counhyside 1 z ry a
Crto 3Lm
o U
Stantec
July 18, 2016
Carl Schwab
Page 4 of 4
Reference: White Chapel Village Memorandum
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Stantec engineers reviewed the recommended improvements from the previously submitted TIA.
This included a Phase 1 build -out (hotel only), full build -out in 2020, and horizon year in 2025.
Recommendations based on the impact of this site included the following:
• Deceleration lanes for Driveways 3 and 4; and
• Traffic Signal with hooded left turn for Driveway 1 at 2020 Full Build -out.
Recommendations based on the impacts of other developments or city recommendations included
the following;
• Traffic signal at the Kirkwood Boulevard/White Chapel Boulevard borne by the Carillon
retail/office development; and
• Add a lane to the westbound approach at the White Chapel Boulevard/SH 114 westbound
frontage road intersection, update phasing to 4 -phase, and optimize signal timing.
From Figure 1, the change in volume would not exceed three vehicles per hour at any of the turning
movements for each of the study intersections, during either peak hour. Though Stantec has not
conducted a formal capacity analysis with the additional hotel trips, it is the professional opinion of
the Engineer that the additional volumes will have a negligible impact on traffic operations at all
studies intersections. The Engineer recommends no additional improvements beyond those
described in the previous TIA.
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
Carl LaFerney P.E., PTOE, MBA
Project Manager
Phone: (214) 468-8200
Fax: (214) 468-8266
Carl.LaFerney@stantec.com
Attachment: Appendix A
Design with community in mind
.,
ItCARL 8
I : ,- ....�..........ERNEY
.V;........� ...;
108169710
zle_�!�
7At/it6
lc v.\1981\busineu development\neof\19811011 I\memowork\memo\trip gen revisor memo - enol.tlocx
APPENDIX A: TRIP GENERATION
WORKSHEETS
Trip Generation
ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition (2012)
Project White Chapel Village
Project Number 198110111
Client Cole Design Group
Site Southlake, Texas
Rooms 220
Land Use Hotel
ITE Code 310
Trips
Weekdays
Total
Percent
Number
Number
In
Out
In Out
Trips = 8.95 (# units) - 373.16
1596
50%
50%
798 798
Trips
AM Peak Hour: Weekdays
Total
Percent
Number
(Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic)
Number
In
Out
In Out
Trips = .53 (# units)
117
59%
41%
69 48
Trips
PM Peak Hour: Weekdays
Total
Percent
Number
(Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic)
Number
In
Out
In Out
Trips = 0.6 (# units)
132
51%
49%
67 65
Trips
Saturdays Total Percent Number
(Peak Hour of Generator) Number In Out In Out
Trips = 0.69 (# units) + 4.32 156 56% 44% 87 69
® Stantec
Trip Generation
ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition (2012)
Project White Chapel Village Project Number 198110111
Client Cole Design Group
Site Southlake, Texas Rooms 240
Land Use Hotel ITE Code 310
Trips
Weekdays Total Percent Number
Number In Out In Out
Trips = 8.95 (# units) - 373.16 1775 50% 50% 888 887
Trips
AM Peak Hour: Weekdays I Total Percent Number
(Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic) Number In Out In Out
Trips = .53 (# units) I 127 59% 41% 75 52
Trips
PM Peak Hour: Weekdays Total Percent Number
(Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic) Number In Out In Out
Trips = 0.6 (# units) 144 51% 49% 73 71
Trips
Saturdays Total Percent Number
(Peak Hour of Generator) Number In Out In Out
Trips = 0.69 (# units) + 4.32 170 56% 44% 95 75
Stantec