The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 6A CITY OF SOU H LA14CE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT September 13, 2016 CASE NO: ZA16-029 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for the Carillon Corporate District EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Hines Southlake Land, LP, Jacobs Engineering, Inc. is requesting 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from `ECZ' Employment Center Zoning District to `ECZ' Employment Center Zoning District to amend the approved Carillon Development Plan layout for the Corporate District and to allow a hotel as a permitted use in the District on approximately 15.36 acres located between the 200 and 400 block of E. State Hwy. 114, being approximately 1,100 feet east of the northeast corner of E. State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood # 3 DETAILS: Jacobs Engineering Inc. is requesting 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from `ECZ' Employment Center Zoning District to `ECZ' Employment Center Zoning District to amend the approved Carillon Development Plan layout for the Corporate District and to allow a hotel as a permitted use in the district. The applicant is proposing the following amendments to the `ECZ' zoning regulations for the Corporate District. The changes to the amendments since 1St reading are highlighted in red. All other aspects of the district and previous conditions of approval are to remain unchanged. Proposed amendments to the `ECZ Zoninq District 1. Amend the permitted uses to allow a hotel as a permitted use in the Corporate District. The hotel height maximum is 90'. inn _aG ipdirated 0A the The hotel architectural design is to generally conform to the Hotel-specific Plaza District requirements in the original ECZ zoning booklet. 2. Redefine the parking standards for the Hotel use based on 1.2 spaces per hotel room. 3. Revise the Development Plan to incorporate a Hotel use along S.H 114 and to remove the Plaza Street `C' connection to S.H. 114. 4. AMeRd the ZZGRORg-ts Ze es,at the frnnteAtra„ Case No. ZA16-029 The following two development plans shown below are a comparison of the changes to the Corporate District: t 1•; 7 J Yam, +^fir N1 vWx Original Corporate District(November 2008) "—MIA u � s _ + 1 i � ■,rt ryy��+•+ i.� � i.i aiy ry i,■ Proposed Corporate District(September 2016) Carillon Corporate District The following information is from the Carillon Master Plan approved by City Council in November of 2008: The Corporate District is comprised of primarily office with the opportunity for additional retail or commercial uses. A 25 foot landscape buffer and a 50 foot building setback is adjacent to S.H. 114. In addition, a 20 foot landscape buffer Case No. ZA16-029 is proposed along Kirkwood Boulevard and the parkway to the north of the Corporate District. This request is being processed in conjunction with a Site Plan for Hotel Indigo- Carillon, a five-story hotel with 119-121 rooms, under Planning Case ZA16-030. The Zoning Change and Development Plan for the Carillon Corporate District must be approved at 2nd reading prior to City Council consideration of the Hotel Indigo Site Plan since the existing zoning does not allow a hotel as a permitted use in the Corporate District. The following conditions were included in the Council motion for approval at 1s' reading on August 2, 2016. City Council Issues/Conditions Applicant's Response The associated Preliminary Plat shows the Work with staff on the right of way continuation of Carillon Ct. access easement as future right of way dedication to be dedicated with the Final Plat. Offer alternative options at 2n reading related to the commercial The loading zone has been relocated from loading and unloading space and the potential to move that out of the front of the building to the driveway the front of the building and the front entrance. along the eastern property line. The proposed development regulations The maximum building height will be 90'. have been revised to show a maximum height of 90'for a hotel in the Corporate District. Council is directing staff to initiate a rezoning process in the Plaza Staff has initiated the rezoning process for District at Carillon specifically to the line item use of hotel as a the Plaza District to remove the hotel as a permitted use and noting the applicant has consented to this staff permitted use under Case No. ZA16-071. action. Although it was not part of the motion, there was discussion at 1 s' The building has been rotated so that the reading regarding rotating the building so that the main entrance main entrance faces Carillon Ct. faces Carillon Ct. VARIANCE REQUESTED: A variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2(d), requiring a stacking depth of 75' for both driveways on the proposed hotel site, is requested to allow approximately 20' of stacking depth on the west driveway and approximately 25' of stacking depth on the east driveway. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated August 29, 2016 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (E) Ordinance No. 564b (F) Full Size Plans (for Commissioners and Council Members only) Link to >werPoint Presentation Link to Narrative Link to Revised Carillon Booklet Pages Parking Demand Analysis and Review Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report Case No. ZA16-029 Link to SPIN meeting Report Link to Approved Carillon Zoning Bonk —Ord. No. 480-564A STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Case No. ZA16-029 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Hines Southlake Land, LP APPLICANT: Jacobs Engineering, Inc. PROPERTY SITUATION: Located between the 200 and 400 block of E. State Hwy. 114, being approximately 1 ,100 feet east of the northeast corner of E. State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 3132 and 3B and a portion of Tract 3A1 , Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: "ECZ" Employment Center Zoning District PROPOSED ZONING: "ECZ" Employment Center Zoning District HISTORY: - On November 18, 2008 the City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development Plan from `NR-PUD' Non-Residential Planned Unit Development and `C-2' Local Retail Commercial District to `ECZ' Employment Center Zoning District for Carillon under Planning Case ZA08-031 (Ordinance No. 480-564). - On April 20, 2010 the City Council approved a Site Plan for the Children's Medical Center at Southlake under Planning Case ZA10-017. - On September 4, 2012 the City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development Plan from `ECZ' Employment Center Zoning District to `ECZ' Employment Center Zoning District to amend some of the development regulations for residential development in Carillon concerning Building Standards and Architectural Controls in the EC Edge Village District and the EC Neighborhood Chateaux District under Planning Case ZA12-066 (Ordinance No. 480-564a). SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Mixed Use. The Mixed Use land use designation is defined within Southlake 2030 as the following: The range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New development must be Case No. Attachment A ZA16-029 Page 1 compatible with and not intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design and transition between different uses. Typically, the Mixed Use designation is intended for medium- to higher-intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and residential uses. Nuisance-free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and Office Commercial categories previously discussed." Urban Design Plan The Urban Design Plan also includes a few recommendations pertaining to the State Highway 114 corridor where this site is proposed to be located. They are as follows: o Establish appropriate scale and bulk standards for buildings along the highway, specifically at mid-block locations. Buildings should be 4 — 6 stories tall and step down as they move away from the highway corridor. Buildings over three stories should be articulated along the first three floors. Materials on the lower floors should be brick, stone or other approved masonry. Low-profile, single story pad buildings that tend to blend into the background and have limited visibility from the highway are discouraged o The view of surface parking from the highway should be limited. Surface parking lots should be designed to be in smaller pods (no more than 200 parking spaces) with increased landscaping and pedestrian accessways. o Structured parking is encouraged over surface parking. Specifically, shared parking is also encouraged between adjoining complementary land uses. Special attention should be given to the design of parking garages to avoid plain facades with views of parked cars from adjoining properties and rights-of-ways. Fagade details, vertical and horizontal courses such as cornices, lintels, sills, and water courses should be used to add interest along facades. To the extent possible, parking garages should be located behind principal structures to limit views from the highway. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed hotel development will have two points of access onto Carillon Court and right-out only access to the Sh. H. 114 frontage road. Two future driveway connections to the property to the east are also provided. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was conducted in May of 2008 during the initial proposal of the master planned Carillon development. Since its approval, an addendum was done in March of 2010 during the proposal of Children's Medical Center to address the reduction of approximately 94,000 square feet of office/retail uses and an addition of 70,000 square feet of a medical center use. Link to 2008 TIA and 2010 Adder and Case No. Attachment A ZA16-029 Page 2 Link to an approval letter from the Texas Departmen- -ransportation Tx( DOT). CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on March 22, 2016 for the Hotel Indigo — Carillon, which included some discussion of the proposed amendment to the `ECZ' corporate District zoning ik tc The 2035 Corridor Planning Committee discussed the proposed Hotel Indigo — Carillon at their May 10, 2016 meeting. Link to 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: May 19, 2016; A motion to deny the item as presented received a (2-2) vote. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: June 7, 2016; Tabled on consent to the August 2, 2016 meeting. August 2, 2016; Approved at 1St reading (7-0) subject to the staff report dated July 26, 2016 and Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated July 22, 2016, granting the variance to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.d requiring a stacking depth of 75' for both driveways on the proposed hotel site allowing approximately 20' of stacking depth on the west driveway and approximately 25' of stacking depth on the east driveway noting the following: 1. that the applicant has indicated a willingness to work with staff on the right of way continuation of Carillon Ct.; 2. also noting the applicant has agreed to offer alternative options at 2nd reading related to the commercial loading and unloading space and the potential to move that out of the front of the building and the front entrance; 3. noting the applicant's agreement that the maximum building height will be 90'; 4. and finally noting that Council with this approval is directing staff to initiate a rezoning process in the Plaza District at Carillon specifically to the line item use of hotel as a permitted use and noting the applicant has consented to this staff action. August 16, 2016; Tabled on consent to the September 6, 2016 meeting. September 6, 2016; Tabled on consent to the September 20, 2016 meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated August 29, 2016. Variance and Appeals to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended: In granting any variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, the City Council shall determine the following: That a literal enforcement of the regulations in the ordinance will create Case No. Attachment A ZA16-029 Page 3 an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant; That the situation causing unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed; That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties; And that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the ordinance. The decision of the City Council shall be final. Case No. Attachment A ZA16-029 Page 4 Vicinity Map Carillon Corporate District =r r.•_�r - � L S i 4 L i O 5 sy r. �1 F sy. 'rr _ A4. E-E3�A`Di i Fl•�� ZA16-429 Zoning Change and • - - Development Plan ry 0 500 1.000 2.000 Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA16-029 Page 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA16-029 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 08/29/16 Project Name: Development Plan — Carillon — Hotel Indigo APPLICANT: Kevin Kessler OWNER: Jeff Kennemer Jacobs Engineering Hines Southlake Land LP 1999 Bryan St. Suite 1200 2200 Ross Ave. Suite 4200W Dallas, TX Dallas, TX Phone: (214) 920-8106 Phone: (972) 716-2900 E-mail: kevin.kessler@jacobs.com E-mail:jeffAennemer@hines.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/26/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602 OR DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748- 8072. 1. The proposed Indigo Hotel Site Plan must conform to the underlying `ECZ' Zoning and Development Plan for Carillon. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. Match up the Tree Conservation Plan and the Utilities Plan. There is a proposed 24" Storm Sewer, 18" Storm Sewer, and Storm Sewer Inlet which conflict with the existing trees proposed to be preserved within the open space area in the north portion of the property. There is an 8" Sewer Service along the east property line that conflicts with existing trees shown as boarder line. Please ensure that the proposed utilities and grading do not conflict with the preservation of the existing trees proposed to be preserved. If existing trees that are designated to be preserved are altered they will be required to be mitigated in accordance with the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The proposed Tree Conservation Plan shows to preserve existing trees that were previously shown to be removed on the Carillon Tree Conservation Plan. The property contains approximately 52% of existing tree cover and if this was straight zoning 50% of the tree cover would be required to be preserved. A total of 17% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. Case No. Attachment C ZA16-029 Page 1 * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the existing the entire site tree cover to be preserved* 0% -20% 70% 20.1 —40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and Case No. Attachment C ZA16-029 Page 2 vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. The parking landscape island at the west end of the parking spaces on the southwest corner of the building does not contain the required canopy tree. Parking landscape islands are required to contain shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, seasonal color, or a combination of these plant materials along with the required canopy trees. Please provide the additional plant material in the parking islands around the open space area. 2. The parking island on the south end of the west parking is less than 12' wide from back-of- curb to back-of-curb. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12' back-to-back if curbed or 13' edge-to-edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. 3. There are fire hydrants proposed within the parking islands on the southwest corner of the open space, and southeast corner of the parking spaces behind the building. Canopy trees are also proposed within these islands. It is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance to plant a tree within ten feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant unless approved in writing by the Fire Department. 4. In the Interior Landscape Summary Chart there are eighteen (18) canopy trees proposed to be planted and thirty-one canopy trees are proposed to be planted within the interior landscape area on the plan design. Correct the Interior landscape Summary Chart to reflect that thirty- one (31) canopy trees are "Provided" within the interior landscape. 5. Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for eighteen (18) accent trees within the interior landscape area and twenty-one accent trees are proposed to be planted. Therefore, only fifteen (15) existing tree credits are proposed to be taken. Correct the Interior Landscape Summary Chart to reflect that twenty-one (21) accent trees are proposed to be "Provided", and existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for fifteen (15) accent trees. The proposed landscaping is consistent with the Carillon development standards landscape requirements. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Case No. Attachment C ZA16-029 Page 3 Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is on the riser. The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant. (A remote FDC is acceptable to meet the requirement)(FDC not shown on plans) FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, a minimum of 24 feet wide with 6 inch red striping that contains 4 inch white lettering that states "FIRE LANE NO PARKING" every 25 feet, and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Label all fire lanes. General Informational Comments A SPIN meeting was held on March 22, 2016. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480-564A. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480-564A. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must Case No. Attachment C ZA16-029 Page 4 be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment C ZA16-029 Page 5 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES Carillon Corporate District waasrr ,�, Soo 9 ,tow H. � � ■•r f P410KA40 Sr Mr M 1. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 250 E SH 114 3.62 NR 2. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 100 E SH 114 5.06 NR 3. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 200 E SH 114 1.04 NR 4. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 190 E SH 114 1.27 NR 5. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 240 E SH 114 0.74 NR 6. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 101 E SH 114 0.40 NR 7. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 201 E SH 114 0.08 NR 8. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 1350 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 6.33 NR 9. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 400 E SH 114 0.06 NR 10. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 430 E SH 114 0.53 NR 11. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 301 E SH 114 2.70 NR 12. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 319 E SH 114 2.86 NR 13. BIEKER,RON ECZ 1621 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 14. MCCAW,NEIL ECZ 1617 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 15. RUCCI,COREY ECZ 1613 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 16. BOISSEVAIN,DAVID ECZ 1609 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 17. K HOVNANIAN HOMES-DFW LLC ECZ 1601 RIVIERA LN 0.21 NR 18. K HOVNANIAN HOMES-DFW LLC ECZ 1605 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 1 19. PERRY,RICHARD B ECZ 308 MONTPELIER DR 0.13 F 20. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 300 CARILLON CT 0.15 NR 21. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 1500 LE MANS LN 0.20 NR 22. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 400 CARILLON CT 1.46 NR 23. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 401 MONTPELIER DR 0.19 NR 24. K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 301 MONTPELIER DR 0.19 NR 25. K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 303 MONTPELIER DR 0.15 NR 26. K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 305 MONTPELIER DR 0.16 NR 27. K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 307 MONTPELIER DR 0.14 NR 28. K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 1508 LE MANS LN 0.14 NR 29. K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 1504 LE MANS LN 0.14 NR 30. K HOVNANIAN HOMES-DFW LLC ECZ 300 MONTPELIER DR 0.24 NR 31. PATEL,TEJAL ECZ 304 MONTPELIER DR 0.15 NR 32. K HOVNANIAN HOMES-DFW LLC ECZ 306 MONTPELIER DR 0.13 NR 33. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 833 ORLEANS DR 0.07 NR 34. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 1700 N CARROLL AVE 20.94 NR 35. DEORA,JITENDRA ECZ 829 ORLEANS DR 0.25 NR 36. K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 1513 LE MANS LN 0.14 NR 37. K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 1509 LE MANS LN 0.18 NR 38. K HOVNANIAN HOMES-DFW LLC ECZ 1505 LE MANS LN 0.24 NR 39. MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS LLC ECZ 817 ORLEANS DR 0.19 NR 40. MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS LLC ECZ 821 ORLEANS DR 0.19 NR 41. CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ECZ 470 E SH 114 9.80 NR K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC 42. (Hythem Omar-Current Owner) ECZ 1501 LE MANS LN 0.33 O 43. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 629 ORLEANS DR 0.54 NR 44. MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS LLC ECZ 825 ORLEANS DR 0.18 NR 45. SOUTHLAKE TX MEDICAL BLDG I LP SP2 431 E SH 114 2.70 NR 46. SOUTHLAKE LAND HOLDINGS LP SP2 451 E SH 114 2.73 NR 47. SOUTHLAKE LAND HOLDINGS LP SP2 401 E SH 114 1.88 NR 48. SOUTHLAKE LAND HOLDINGS LP SP2 335 E SH 114 15.09 NR F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Twenty (20) Responses Received Within 200': Two (2) Responses Received Outside 200': Five (5)Responses Received Within 200' Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 2 Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA16-029 City of Southiake Meeting Date: May 19, 2016 at 6:30 PM Planning S Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 PERRY. RICHARD B Southlake, TX 76092 308 MaNTPELLER DR Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)74"077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Be,ng the owner(s) of the property so noted above. are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: EZA Additional Signature- k- .� f Date: /'G Printed Name(s): _R LL_11 Jf 1, �k Y Must be popery c+aneri s 1 r,rnc-se narne(S)are prw*W at top othstwoe contact me Planning Depaiwent One form per p'oP's'1Y Phone Number (optional): S q2_1 -Lf--71 0 Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 3 030 Southlake Planning &. Zoning Commission Meeting D31 Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name:`��t1l'� Omoy- � L1" "k � � Date: Address• 1501 Lt KIAn S_ _ Phone:- .k 5 �� {Iwl-k City and State/ CJ I wish to share m. irurg on an Agenda Item: Agenda [tern 4WI D I will speak in SUPPORT of this item i will speak in OPPOSMON to this item I do not%sh to speak.,but please record my SUPPORT UPM]SITION ❑ Citiacn Comments(for an item on th's agenda) X are• COnGx r"j av,r (�.� �11�,-• rPcr�l t5 vo'ct� ct� 6ecn 13"' Signature: �reg�A►•► �r-rn �e►�� 'aP Required: Cards will mat ha read Inra the rmard mAkss&Is slgne-& Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 4 Responses Received Outside 200' 5.1;QToi; _1.xaAha eULus Aial-c'.vd Cases LA16-Q.IAlf 0&.6 LA 16-031 osow-HLAKE Holly Blake 4hblakeCWci.south1ake.tx.us> Fwd: Cases ZA16-029, ZA16-030, S ZA16-031 1 message kbaker&i.southlake,tcus<kbaker@cl southlake.tx use Thu. May 19,2016 at 12:22 PKI To: Richard Schell�rscheli@ci.southlake-tx-use- Hal ly Blake<hblakc�_Wei.south Iake.tx usi Sent from my Phone Begin forwarded message: Froth:Mary Lee Afford Date:May 19. 2016 at . To:Traci Henderson 0-thender3on@cl.southlake-tx-Levo,"kbakerc ci.southtake-tx.us' ckbaker cI southlaka tx us, Cc: Carl Alford — : - - :- S u bj ect. • -Subject Cases IA16-029,7A1"30, &ZA16Mi Reply-To:Mary Lee Alford To the City of 5outhlake Planning & Zoning Commission: We are unable to attend the P&Z meeting tonight. We are 100% in favor of the plans submitted by the Indigo Hotel developer as shown in cases ZA16-029. ZA 16-030. & ZA 16-031 . CAUSE AND EFFECT-Every action has a reaction. If Carillon Court is not finished as planned, I wonder how the corporate district would adjust. Perhaps the corporate office buildings would have to be moved more to the north,nearer the homes in the residential district,in order to provide good traffic flow for the corporate district. Without Carillon Court going through,would the effect be more traffic through the residential district? We still have Southmont.Would people who turn on Southmont find that, because they couldn't get through on Carillon Court,to continue their route, they must now drive up Riviera, Le Mans,or Orleans? Look at the other exits from the Me 1maI9"e.CMPrna U0?_Aj-261k=cc7Va5A6v1ew=plasearcl}rroaaa7rI!AcaoslowlwEdmIM1=1;w.awlawle25d 3 Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 5 19•��17 CI SWUAL-bi.us L1 ail-Fwd Casee ZAIrrW9.ZAI&MO.E ZA1&0.31 retail district. Without Carillon Court going from Southmont to the retail district, shoppers leaving the retail district to the east will be forced to drive in the residential district. We personally believe,not allowing Carillon Court to flow directly into the retail district will generate MORE traffic into the residential district. We want the hotel and retail because: 1. LIFESTYLE-We didn't pay the exact some price for our tiny villa lot that we paid for 220 acres just north of here for dirt;we bought a LIFESTYLE, Southlake Town Center is very similar,residential is adjacent to retail,which is what we want however, we wanted an individual,detached home. Southlake Town Center has a hotel, retail, restaurants, and residential. It's all beautifully master- planned. In the same way that Central bisects the residential ffam the retail areas of Southlake Town Center;Carillon Court bisects the Corporate District from the residential district in Carillon. We've not seen a great deal of retail traffic driving through the residential district in Southlake Town Center. Carillon Court does nat go through the residential district in Carillon, it skirts the residential district to the south, separating the corporate from the residential, and serves the corporate district. 2. PERFORMING ARTS CENTER—A Performing Arts Center(PAC) has been on the plans since 2009,which was exciting to us when we reviewed the development plans at the City BEFORE we bought in Carillon. It is part of the lifestyle we purchased. Now that I'm more involved in the local arts, I hear that Grapevine wants the PAC,and there is a group in Westlake desiring to put their Arts League back together who would like to see the PAC built in Entrada. After talking to Terri Messing with APEX Arts League, she insists that the PAC must be near a hotel so that the hotel can cater to the PAC Without the hotel,there is a strong,and likely possibility that we will also not have the PAC. We want to be able to walk to the type of entertainment APEX and a PAC would bring to Southlake, 3. PERSONAL SAVINGS—Our villa is our second "downsize". Since it's just the two of us,it no longer made sense to spend money on a huge home to house overnight or vacationing guests who rarely visit. If we need extra space, it's more cost effective to have visitors practically next door in a hotel.They have greater hl�s.:m ail good e.ox-I•m ail'u17��r=16x=c[737 afi."'Sd6ve•�-plA.saxc+�+rocas Stn=i:f1c alJa7•�1 e"'GQE3irn I=7!.�caCe'3i'd 1 ck5d _. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 6 U192D16 Ci soulNake.ts.us,A1a�-Fwd Caries ZA16-Mg.ZA16-030.3 ZA16-031 privacy,can be more comfortable about throwing towels on the floor,go to the bar for late night drinks,come and go as they want,etc.They can walk to aur home to visit, we can meet at the hotel or other restaurants,and we don't spend the money on construction, maintenance, and taxes,on space we rarely use. 4. BENEFIT TO SOLITHLAKE&RETAIL—The French architecture of this Indigo Hotel is rich and classic,like no other in Southlake. We are firm believers of the "if you build It,they will come" philosophy. For example, after 7 years of not attracting retail, once the hotel was under contract,a new business has already been announced I It's just the beginning of the retail we've been waiting for. Regarding the dog park, it is not something the hotel developers specifically wanted. They included it in the plans as an"option" in case they needed it in the future for clients because this hotel will allow people to bring their dog pets. The developer simply does not want to have to return to P&Z in the future if they find that the dog park would be needed. We have no problem with a dog park. We met most of our neighbors by walking Coco and often knew the names of our dog neighbors long before we actually knew the names of their people parents. We have a lot of dogs in the Villa District. Carl and I personally would love to have a dog park within walking distance so Coco could be off leash and able to play with our other dog neighbors. Since the dog park would be in the Corporate District, I think it would be maintained by the POA (Professional Owners Association) rather than the HOA. Although i believe the developer will not initially build the dog park, and may never if there is not a perceived need, we would love to have a dog park. Thank you for your service to our city and your consideration of these comments. Best regaMs. Carl and MafyUv Allard P. 0. Box 92517 1812 5t, Philip Ave. ti«cilhlake. '1,3{70092 (817) 980-5028 rax ,real9myecun,vrivKV0'Iu=28A=cc737aU6dtwvN=psewdr-inomgrF+5acaC>a'fMleiMdRs-mr=JMcaDa7C*Ta_Nd Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 7 RMJ2016 C.aauihleka.h a IL erl-FNd:Slgj�prS�xg Ifgl9q i[eg V1 Ellr els CartpR_�SMUa d Ih7llSrrr in CY.I:m S4F QUTHLAKE Richard Schen arsehefl@ci.soulhfake.[x.us> Fwd: Support for the Indigo Hotel, Wellness Center, and Salons of Volterra in Carillon ' •r.ess�ix Ken Baker<kbakerQcl.southlake.tx.us> Wed, Aug 31_2016 at 12 14 ANI ROC' r901611&i.souttliake tx.us Commissioners, Please see the email bekrm•regarding development in the Can Aon plaza and corporate districts,Thanks. Ken Forwarded massage From: MaryLse Alford Date: Tue,Aug 30.2016 at 5:39 PM Subjelct Support for the Indigo Hotel,Wellness Center,and Salons of Veftefrs In CaniIon To- Kon Baker rkixakerinci.southlake-tx.us> August 30, 2017 Kenneth Baker,South lake Senior Director of Planning&Development Services City of Southlake 1400 Main Street,#►310 Soutihlake,TX 76091 For distribution to members of the Planning&Zoning Commission and City Council. Dear Mr.Baker et alis, I helped coordinate a meeting between the residents of Carition and the proposed developers/business owners who wish to build in the Carillon retail district.There were 40 in attendance. it was a very positive meeting. Hopefully you will receive many letters of support for these businesses. My husband,Carl and I are supportive of the Indigo Hotel,and the proposed Wellness Center and Salons of Volterra to be built in Carillon, The architecture presented by Mr.Ron Smith is beautiful and fits well with the required French Renaissance architecture required,as listed in the Carillon Zoning Booklet. Many of the services provided by these businesses will attract women to the retail district,helping to support other WpeJlmai. x0azwnjmiuVd07L1+7.drke17M34496&%1*w-pA&awdi'inb=&1-F56dtM*13k.7M&gIrnI=159A4dd34c2972 Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 8 93112016 C aOUMOW x.La AI S-Fwd Sipparl for IN kdgD HaW WNIrMS Center,ero S&EM ct Vo acre rn Canitw potential businesses in Carillon. If approved,once construction begins,this will certainly attract other business to Carillon. We'd also like to express: - We paid the same amount,to the dollar,For our small Villa lot in Carillon as we did for 220 acres In Cooke County,one hour north of South lake. We didn't buy dirt in Southlake,we bought a lifestyle,and did so feeling secure that the 5outhlake City Council had already approved the development plans for the Carillon retail district in 2008-2009,and will ensure those plans are honored. - A Performing Arts Center JPAQ is on the original plan for Carillon and was a major consideration when we selected Carillon for our home. It can be paid for and supported with hotel Occupancy Tax,a vote by the South lake citizens to use the tax that will pay for Phase 11 of the Marq,proceeds from venues,and benefactors. We believe that,with the PAC,the Carillon retail district could became the"Cultural DMrict"of Southlake,especially since we currently have no cultural district_I have a lot of ideas to share on how to encourage retail businesses in Carillon to become"mini museums",attracting patrons to their businesses. Carillon by definition is a French bell tower,also on the original plans, which could be paid for with the same monies required to be spent on tourism. These same monies could also be used to build the beautiful fountain,also on the original plans. - Although we would be delighted to have most any gourmet coffee shop,Starbuck's would be an important addition because people have Starbuck's apps used when traveling and trying to find a Starbuck's coffee,which will bring people from Highway 114 into the retail district,and hopefully shop or eat in other Carillon establishments. We would be supportive of a developer completing the Master Plan for the retail district of CarlIIon so that this area isn't"piece mined"and,hopefully would be completed sooner. Carillon is the perfect place for the niche restaurant clusters, and a culinary school,as recommended by MXD 1n the 2035 plan, Many are concerned that White Chapel Is not going to be adequate to handle the new traffic into the retail district,as it is projected that the hotel,wellness spa,and salons could be completed by the end of 2017. Being concerned about adequate parking,we would be in favor of including beautifully designed parking garages,especially next to a beautiful PAC. xlpaDhndi.gwO&carr�Vt#WhAaMk=17W4 Ce5Svwx=plLactirr+F -rtmW-156Un4dd34t29r2&Wn1=i98X64C04c2872 Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 9 931120141 Ci sot+INake tK_us Mel-FwG Support br the Irdgo Howl.Wdlrws Center,and Sela"s of'JG17errA it Csr 1xn Thank you for protecting our Investment in Southlake and Carillon. Sincerely, MaryLee&Carl Alford 1812 St.Philip Ave, P.0. Box 92517 Southlake,TX 76092 MaryLee's mobil#(8 17)980-5028 Cart's mobil#(817)229-4722 Kenneth M. Baker, AICD Senior Director of Planning and Development Services City of Southlake 1400 Main Street-Sults 310 Southtake,TX 76092 817-748$067 P&PffJin ail.gnogibmm- -41W31'fd-Mt=tTl�Ck340l163rmrr=-pEB,sesrcl ur�rlLlh 151.�UlO�Mc?9Tlaaimk�lSBdlUsdd34c2871 ...- Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 10 51192616 CI WtMak.e.tx US Marl-FW ZAi6-a2g7A16-36litig0 IDSOUTH..AKE Holly Blake<hbiake@ci-southlake.tx_us> FW: ZA16-029 ZA16-30 Indigo 1 message Traci Henderson gtr+endcrson&i-southlake.tx.us> Thu, May 19, 2016 at 144 PM To Holly Blake ahblake9c,southlake tx use fy Traci Henderson, TRMC Deputy Oily Secretary Oty of Southlake 1400 Main Streel. Suite 270 Southlake, Texas 76092 thenderson@ci southlake Ix us 817-748-8015-OMce 817-748-8270-Fax Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)i and may contain confidential and privileged Information. Any receipt arbor response to this email may be considered a PUBLIC RECORD_ If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender Immediately. Any unauthorized review, use. disclosure,or distribution is prohibited_ ---Original Message---- From Debbie Teape[maillo Sent- Thursday. May 19, 20 To. thenderson@ci southiake tx us CC: kbake-r&i.southiake tx.us Subject; ZA 16-029 ZA 16-30 Indigo To whom it may concem, I would like to be on records as 100% for the beautiful Indigo Hotel in Carillon and in full support of how they have designed the entrance and landscaping Also before we purchased (as did every other resident)tive saw and were fully aware that Canllon Court would be extended to Whites Chapel. We are so excited about this addition to our development. Thank you for your support- Chris and Debbie Teape 412 Montpelier Drive Southlake. Sent from my Whone nnAjNnal900¢0-cernAn2Ak"Ii-2W-CC737a625dlLV w+ptdserch-Irla Mv-154ca56BBO5d85b36simI-t54caWFAD54A5W 1 , Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 11 i'X),.G Cit011h*q-tic.1m Mal•Fwd For Carl IIon d"apTwo WSr, v r. CUTHLAKE Richard Schell rrschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: For Carillon development 1 nTessaoe Ken Baker-ckbeker@ci.scuthlahe.lx_usa wed,Aug 31.201eat 12.22 AM To: Richard Schell trscNA@ci.sou:hiake.tx,us>,Dams Kilkwgh adkitlough@ci,southlakeJx.us�- Forwarded messane From; Debbie Twpt Date: Tue, Aug 30,2016 at 3:50 PM StAect. For QyMon development To: kbakerod.southlaike tx,us Dear sir, fuly 100%,behind getting these retail spaces and hotel under construction.We live on 412 Montpelier drive and attended the meeting with a9 the developers. Please, please matte this process as easy as possible. Thank you, Deobie Teape. Sent from my Phone Kenneth M. Baker,AICP Senior Director of Planning and Development Services Cily of Southiake 1400 Main Street•Suite 310 Southlake,TX 76092 817.748-8067 h[Ap61hng1,g-q�ecpnhnaUu�dr?u1�281k�1781944Et1<lRvipw=pt8sagrLf�irdlmcR�15Br]Ii�e7}8CWi1�Ltinl 155d![)r:e718�16f� 1;s Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 12 5102wiG C,qoL►Nakn Ix�n M7a Re HaW kow-vinous Canlion n HeWoffft corsas USOUTHLAKL Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake-tx-use Re: Hotel Indigo-Various Carillon Residents Opinions Tom Plimpton Thu, May 18, 2016 at 11:38 AM To: rschell@ci,southlaKe_tx.us Here Is a late response...a MAYBE YES I apologize for the late reply, and hope this can still be sent to the P&Z committee, as 1 am unsure of where to send it myself-Thanks for taking the time to put this together. My parents live on LeMans, off Carillon Court, and I live in the estate section of Carillon- We do support the hotel, but I agree with the concerns others have raised about the traffsc flow. It is true that when people purchased In the vilias section, there was a plan for development off 114; however, those plans indicated an office space there. The traffic flow for an office space Is very different from that of a hotel. especially for evenings and weekends_Additionally, we are concerned that future development in the area will further increase traffic, and now is the opportunity to address that.My young children frequently walk or bike in that area, and we are concemed that the Increased traffic flow would be a safety risk. We are in favor of the hotel, but strongly support efforts to minimize the traffic flow through the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration- That makes 24 responses- Thanks On Thu, May 19, 201$at 10:04 AM, Tom Plimpton <tplimptontx@gmad,com?wrote: Bear Richard, Thank you for taking my call this morning. Attached Is a document summarizing the feelings of 22 of our Carillon residents regarding the proposed Hotel Indigo that will be discussed tonight, As we discussed, our community has a website for discussion of activities, etc. I posted the question on the hoard yesterday which you can see on page one of the document. I asked for one of three possible answers. A vote of YES means in favor of the hotel, A vote of MAYBE YES means in favor of the hotel but with reconsideration of traffic flows in and around Carillon. A vote of ISD means not in favor of the hotel. As you can see, the vast majority of respondents favor the hotel but with further work/planning on the traffic flows and congestion in and around Carillon. Thank you for your time and effort to get this Information to the Commissioners, Tom Plimpton 1817 Riviera Ln 425-891.5467 PS...please let me know that you received this email. hasnsall904eCCMtn8bWW?W-Z&k=178FRWWAvcmu-ps&years-orb= msq-154c942_%*� yr,1.-154c9@2%83V1xW Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 13 91WA16 Ci.Sal ABLm,ui MO-UpdWdCvnowAsaiHLxd VO w OSOLITHLAKT Richard Schell <rschell(dd.southlake.tx_us> Updated Comments on Hotel indigo Tom Plimptar Thu, May 19,2016 at 1:14 PM To r5Ghell@ca.auuuarunq.1A.ue I received a few more comments. Attached is a complete list. Sorry for the stragglers. This is my final list. Thanks Tom Plimpton P&Z Opinions UpdaW 1pm.docx 140K 11")1Ra all Qx4e.oamxna Id.alA'?U=2&k-'7M34OW&Yiaw=V search=i rbox&th-154Cs3a'Sle5efi7e 1"m I.15k as7B5la&. 7e1 V1 Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 14 Shall we let the P&Z Committee know how we feel? Tom Plimpton tram Carillon posted.... Here is an idea. We all have opinions on this issue. We are using this forum to vent, express our feelings and, to some degree, try to influence each other. Since we have over 300 members/users on this site, why don't we all just post our feelings in one of three ways. 4;� 1. Yes. This means you are in favor of the project as being presented to the P&Z committee tomorrow night.` Oa..,-7 2. Yes, but with a desire to see more work on traffic flow and congestion. This means the same as above but with reservations about traffic.o:i OR..J. .�..�, -- 3. No. This means you are not in favor of a hotel in our neighborhood..tgpC The packet for the meeting can be viewed at...*'o"milittp.//weblink.cityotsouthlake.commebLi... i18: As we saw at last night's HOA meeting, we had about 75 of the 500 homeowners in attendance. So, it is not likely many will make it to tomorrow nights P&Z meeting. Yet, they need to hear our feelings., So, IF you want to, reply to this post as YES, MAYBE YES or NO and we Can get this to the P&Z along with the definitions of what those short answers mean. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 15 If you do not want to post publicly (which I can fully understand). Send me a private message and I will add in to the results. Or, make up your own short version of your feelings. . KA11 just an idea....if you don't like it.--I am OK with that as well. Just trying to help out. Sort of like an online petition so to speak. RESPONSE #1-MAYBE YES I am a maybe. Traffic is a concern as is the rest of the development. I am curious how the entire retail plan changes as a result of moving the hotel from the middle to the proposed location. Not only how this impacts the layout of future stores/restaurants but more importantly where the various future entrances will be. My concern is that regardless where the hotel is the main points of entrance will always be Carillon Court and Kirkwood "7 :,I am also a maybe in that I do not believe that building a hotel will attract future retail development and have concerns that the hotel will not be sustainable (given other hotels either being built or being proposed) in Southlake/West Lake/Trophy Club. Response #2-MAYBE YES I am a #2 Yes with reservations about traffic flow_ Response #3-MAYBE YES Great suggestion! #2 Response #4-MAYBE YES #2- yes with better traffic flow Response #5-MAYBE YES Yes, maybe, regarding traffic flow and possible new entrance Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 16 Response #6-MAYBE YES Yes #2 concerned about traffic need more study. Response #7-MAYBE YES #2 - yes with better traffic flow Response #8-YES Yes. Response #9-MAYBE YES #2, yes in favor of hotel but have concerns about proposed traffic flow re: accessing from Carillon Ct. Would much prefer egress from 114 access road, new road through what might be retail/commercial in the future or White's Chapel. Unfortunately, we'll be unable to attend tomorrows P&Z. Thanks so much for suggesting this forum so those that can't attend have a voice, Time permitting, I'll try to access the website & submit my concerns. Response #10-MAYBE YES Tom -42 option I like_ Response #11-YES Yes Response #12-MAYBE YES XXX and I agree with #2, yes to hotel but would like a different traffic flow option to bypass access to the neighborhood. Thank you' Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 17 Response #13-MAYBE YES Creat idea Tom, Yes for #2 option Response #14-MAYBE YES #2. I am also unable to attend due to kids' activities. Thank you for suggesting this option to share our opinions. Response #15-MAYBE YES Agree with 42--want traffic flow to bypass access to the neighborhood as others have expressed above Response #16-MAYBE YES Maybe yes Response #17-MAYBE YES #2, thanks for posting Response #18-MAYBE YES I'm just concerned about the traffic also. It looks like a beautiful hotel but would hate to have the majority of the traffics for it flowing thru Carillon Court Response #19-MAYBE YES 02. t will not be able to attend tonight, so thank you for posting this, as it enables my voice to be heard Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 18 Response #20-ND but could be a MAYBE YES Tom, thanks for the "summary". Not sure I can attend the meeting but I did want to let you know My wife & I oppose the hotel or at a minimum there shouldn't be direct access to our neighborhood. Access from the 114 access road only makes the most sense. Hopefully we can work out an advantageous option assuming the city hasn't already rubber stamped this Thanks again, Response #21-Na #3 No Response #22-YES or MAYBE YES Either i or 2. If the second entrance off the 114 service road is built in conjunction with the hotel (Attachment E, page 3), then that will likely be the most used access to & from the hotel. The traffic flow onto Carillon Ct, then into the hotel would not flow by existing homes. Users entering the hotel on Southmont to Carillon Ct. from 114 would have to take the Carroll exit and sit through a stoplight. If that second entrance is not built in conjunction with the hotel, then traffic flows should be assessed. Response #23-MAYBE YES My vote is 42. so up to my vote, there are the following votes: 1. 2 Votes 2. 14 Votes 3. 0 Votes Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 19 there were 2 Maybes Of those who voted, there is an overwhelming majority who want to limit access to the development. However, in the P&Z process, a majority vote {such as occurred} does not necessarily equate to the P&Z accepting our views automatically. So attendance tonight is important to make sure our voices are heard. I was also trying to think of a comparison and if you look at the "Central Market" development, it is very successful and even smaller in size than our proposed area. If you have ever tried to weave your way through and out of that area, there is a lot of traffic. So it's not just the hotel...it's everything that comes after. If it is a successful retail endeavor this is the potential amount of traffic that could be coming in and out of the retail space. Contrast that to the new retail across the street (by Michaels etc.) where no traffic can exit directly to the adjoining residential development without having to go down a separate road. Response #24-MAYBE YES #s2, Thanks for posting the options. Response #25-YES #1 - because of cause and effect - see my reasoning in a separate post. Response #26-MAYBE YES 2 for me please Response #27-MAYBE YES I apologize for the late reply, and hope this can still be sent to the P&Z committee, as I am unsure of where to send it myself. Thanks for taking the time to put this together. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 20 My parents live on LeMans, off Carillon Court, and I live in the estate section of Carillon. We do support the hotel, but I agree with the concerns others have raised about the traffic flow. It is true that when people purchased in the villas section, there was a plan For development off 114, however, those plans indicated an office space there. The traffic flow for an office space is very different from that of a hotel, especially for evenings and weekends. Additionally, we are concerned that future development in the area will further increase traffic, and now is the opportunity to address that. My young children frequently walk or bike in that area, and we are concerned that the increased traffic flow would be a safety risk. We are in favor of the hotel, but strongly support efforts to minimize the traffic flow through the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 21 4-. Y 1, 5OLITHLAKE Ri&ard Schell e-rschellAu.southlakaAx.us> Re: 15104 Hotel Indigo Southlake - Carillon Corporate District DeveIopmord-zoning case DAVE A LORINDA OlGiOVAHM' +. Tue. Aug 2, 2016 at 5:31 PM Reply-To;DALE&LORINDA DIGIOVAN. To. limn Swith<RSrrr tthgmtryseassociates.comi Cc: "Rlchard Schell (rgr.hell,Aci.southlakc.lx.usr-rscWl4gci.sarihlake-tx.us.>, Kar Baker rkbakerUasoulWake.tx.us}, Dennis Killoug+t cdkllough@cl_southlalke.mus> The plans ane the overall design are fantastic. i have no concerns and see this as a gathering point in 5outhiake and as the start of nigh quality development in this area. Dare DiGicvanni On Monday,August 1,2016 6:30 PM, Ron Smith<RSrnith@mayseassociales.corns wrote: [Dave DI Giovanni As you are aware, we are presenting the Zoning change to allow the Indigo Hotel being located in the Carillon Corporate District along HWY 114 to City Council on August 2nd. I attachPd the development plan we revised to address your concerns, and those of the neighborhood, N$ 1. The new plan does not have access to Carillon Court from the proposed office development to the East of the hotel. 2. The plan now shows the right-tum out only (all that TXDOT will allow)Just to the West of the hotel. Tnis will minimize hotel traffic on Ca ri lion Court for guests going back to 114 3. Plan shows the large landscape area to the North of the hotel, containing existing trees to remain as buffer to the North 4. Main entry to the futjre retail area off 114 to West of hotel will be bu'lt with hotel and Carillon Court extension to allow access to hotel site off 114. avoiding traffic through neighborhood to Ne East. Per our last meet ng, I understand we now have your support and I# at of the neighborhood, it would be helpful and greatly appreciated if you could provide writter support to Dennis Killough and Ken Baker at the City of Southlake; if even via `reply all f"to this emalI so they're aware of your support_ Please follow Drop box link below to architectural drawings: https iiw:.,iw.drophox,00rrvsh/97xaus:1vea7}X99/AAADuOcVOH9ZE9Xaf3XFPe;va?d1=0 Please do not hesitate to calf if you have any questions. Tbank you `or your support and participation_ h�3:;'tea I.grog�.tan,tnstA.t'Q"ts,r=2SIk=179fS34�EF.B,ne r-p16a�r�w rt�rdri 5�75EaiSze'�,rt�.�ra.m=}55aJ60.:'ierii57N 1, Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 22 w3we Gi-mx*9akmtw un LA41-Rn I'i KO Hd+r Irri w,Sxr-w,itn-csrii lm c orpxw.-(1 i sC I cl l7"aonwt-zrftrn rasa Sincerely, Ronald K,Smith AIA,P.E. A,chl[drs,d.,r loch,al rnnnaer Mays*&Aasodabs.bw- Anhkoaum Plo+nng ly wNv Dwroar 148W Quarm D"e, Suite 201 Dallas.Texas 75254 972.366-0338 ext. 204 1.477-3B6-0579 Fax "Excetient Pro&pc� Exoedlent 5ervres"-Ince 1983 Neaw ten=der the environment betwe printing this email. 'rtC76��nil gnv�e.ccm:nar'.+,�lu"rV=261k=•7'dtEC}tC�r•ew•P1BretrrJ�•'rbou[dre[Ng•I;F�c�4u�S2ar8eriml-1�F Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 23 �SOUTHZ.la KE Richard Schell-�rschell@d.southlake.tx.us;1, Re: 15104 Hotel Indigo Southlake - Carillon Corporate District Development-zoning case 1 nessagc Tue,Aug 2, 201$at 9'33 AAI To: RSmithamayseassociates.corn Cc- khakeraci,southlake.tx,us, dkrllough@cr.south lake.U.us, rschell�§ci.southlake_tx_us ' Thank you so much Ron. I have copied our prior group of individuals who were involved in the pest meetings, and while I can't speak fix them. I want to thank you for your flexitAity and listening to our concerns_ I am very supportive of the changes you made especralty Fmlting traffic to Canllon Court as there are ohrldren who live close by and it dust seems like the right thing to do. Many in the community are very excited to sea this progressing as your design IS really top notch. I hope further deveioprnerrt will continue with the Sarno quality, and that the hotel whit now serve as an anchor to attract further top quality relad. Dave,,left, Tina, Steve, and Hythenl.......piease feel free to add your commends too, as Ken Baker and Dennis KIII ough with the City have been so helpful as well. It's hard to please everyone and vie appreciate their efforts in making the process transparent and open(as 4 should bey. Have a great day everyone! And thanks again Ron for your communication! Regards. Ken&Betsy Gross 625 Orleans Drive original Message— Frflm: Ran Sm#th-cRStn th@mayseassociates.com;i- Dennis Klllough-i:dkllloug*cl.southlake.tx.us>;Richard Schell rrschell@ci.southlake.tx.us>(rschell@cr sourthlake.tx.usy<rschell@.ci,soulhlake.tx.U" Sent:Mon,Aug 1, 2016 6:34 pm Subject: FW: 15104 Hotel Indigo Southlake•Cartfken Corporate District Development-zoning case Kern As you are aware,we are presenting the Zoning change to allow she tndigo Hotel being located in the Carillon Corporate Dstnct along HWY 114 to City Council on August 2nd. I attached the development plan we revised to address your concerns, and those of the neighborhood NOTABLE REVISIONS 1. The new plan does not have access to Carillon Court from the proposed office development to the East of the hotel. 2. The plan now shows the 004 urn cut only(all that TXDOT will aHowl just to the West of the hotel. This will rninimtze hotel Traffic on Carillon Coot for guests going back to 114 3. Plan shows the large landscape area to the North of the hotel, containing existing trees to remain as buffer to the North 4. Main entry to the future retail area tiff 114 to West of hotel well be built with hotel and Carilian Court extension to allow access to hotel site aft`114,avoiding traffic through neighborhood to the East. hgpxlhns�.goc ecamhnrrW 7l� 11t�17999IClJ9bruu-pf$�c�arcF�irtrx�U+=15ft4oar24cr$P7a-&rom1 564WC414C1fA7ac 1:2 Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 24 W2016 CI.SoLrYdcotK ix;rami-Re 15164 HcW hagDSOAHM(a-CarIIm CrxWao DistrrC1 pw+rtioprn"-mm ripr� Per our last meeting, I understand we now have your support and that of the neighbodxxid. It would be helpful and greatly appreciated d you could provide written support to Dennis Killough and Kerr Baker at the City of Southlake: if liven via'reply all"to this email so they're aware of your support. Please follow Drop box link below to architectural drawings. https!rwww.drovbvx.cort>tsh 97xausl-vea7k99`AAADLjCcVOH$ZE9X.a(aXFPelva?dI=O Pleasc do not hesitate to call rf you have any questions.Thank you for your support and participation. Sincerely, Ronald K.Smith AU, P.E. Rn hdeO,AfthKettefa!Engr�ear Maps S Associates,Inc. A1c"ecWpe Pig^n Op mteriar Dewgr. 14850 Quorum ❑rive, Suite 2111 Dauras,Texas 75254 972-3864)338 ext. 204 972-386-0578 Fax "ErcWtent Prvduc4 Excellent service"since 1983 Please consider Me environment beiere prinurtr-this email. '146:.NnallgoVeixxT%Nr4VwOOrU-2Sk=178190408Uoerr-P%fieerch=Ir4b= r56*w24c]EWwA&rmI-1567WN.:1eB7ac Case No. Attachment D ZA16-029 Page 25 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-564b AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 3132 AND 3B AND A PORTION OF TRACT 3A1, LARKIN H. CHIVERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 300, SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 15.355 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "ECZ" EMPLOYMENT CENTER ZONING DISTRICT TO "ECZ" EMPLOYMENT CENTER ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE CARILLON CORPORATE DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 1 WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "ECZ" Employment Center Zoning District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 2 those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Tracts 3132 and 313 and a portion of Tract 3A1 , Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 15.355 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "ECZ" Employment Center Zoning District, to "ECZ" Employment Center Zoning District for the Carillon Corporate District as depicted on the approved Development Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 3 Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," and subject to the following conditions: 1. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 4 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 5 SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1St reading the 2nd day of August, 2016. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2016. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Being described as Tracts 3132 and 313 and a portion of Tract 3A1, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 15.355 acres, and more fully and completely described below: Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 15-355 ACRES BEING A 15.355 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN TI IE I-ARKIN 11. CHIVERS SURVEY.ABSTRACT NO. 300. IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF A 280.866 ACRE TRACT OF LAND. CONVEYED TO HINES SOLITHLAKE LAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,AS RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO. D207372094,OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS AND BEING ALL OF CARILLON COURT (A 63 FOOT RIGITT-CIF-WAY). SAID 15.355 ACRE TRACT. WITH REFERENCE BEARING BASIS BEING GRID NORTH.TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATES.NORTH CENTRAL ZONE, NAD83 (CORS96. FPOCH DATE 2002).DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS BETWEEN 3I1_IAN DAY 253. 2004 AND JULIAN DAY 259.20X4.CALCULATED FROM DALLAS CURS ARP (PID-DF8984)AND DENTON CORS ARP(PID-DF8986), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A 5r8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "JACOBS" SET FOR A SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CARILLON OFFSITE INFRASTRUCTURE & CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER. AN ADDITICIN TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. AS RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERIC'S FILE NO.D211101072. PLAT RECORDS,TARRANNT COUNTY.TEXAS, SAID POINT BEING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 114.(A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) AND THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHMONT DRIVE,(A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY), SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 280.866 ACRE TRACT AND I HL BLGINN1NG OF A CURVE I'O THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL_ ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 22 SECONDS,A RADIUS OF 7659.44 FEET.AND A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 64 DEGREES 07 ML' TTFS 59 SECONDS WEST.A DISTANCE OF 515.40 FFET. THENCE, ALONG THE SO(TTH LINE OF SAID 280.866 ACRE TRACT AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LUNE OF SAID STATE. HIGHWAY NO. 114.THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC DISTANCE OF 515.50 FEET TO A TXDOT MONUMENT FOL NI D FOR CORNER: NORTII 66 DEGREES 03 MTNUTES 21 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 776.131=EEL"TO A 5!8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAI' STAMPED"JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER. THENCE,OVER AND ACROSS SAID 280.866 ACRE TRACT. THE FOLLOWING COURSES&ND DISTANCES: Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 9 NORTH 23 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST.A DISTANCE OF 4231st}FEET TO A 5.-8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER; SOUTH 66 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST.A DISTANCE OF 7.43 FE E.T TO A 5 8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER AND THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CARVE TO THE I.F.FT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 03 SECONDS.A RADIUS OF 458.50 FEET.AND A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 77 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST.A DISTANCE OF 184.28 FEET: ALONG SAID TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 185.49 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER SOUTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 10 SECONDS FAST.A DISTANCE.OF 39.33 FEET TO A 518 INCH IRON ROD WFTH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER AND'1'III. I3F:GINN ING OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 51 SECONDS.A RADIUS OF 531.50 FEET.AND A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTTH 77 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST.A DISTANCE OF 214.63 FEET: ALONG SAID TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, PASSING AT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 83.52 FEET THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A CORNER CLIP LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE RIVIERA LANE(A 51 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY)AND THE NORTH LINE OF AFORE SAID CARIIJ-ON CO(TRT[A 63 F00 I RIGHT-OF-WAY] AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF CARILLON PHASE 2A-2.AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SO[ITH LAKE ACCORDING TO THE PI..AT RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO.D213015133.PLAT RECORDS. TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS,CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF CARILLON COURT.A TOTAL ARC DISTANCE OF 210.12 FEET A 51`8 1NCI I IRON ROD WITII I'ELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER. THENCE,ALONG THF: SA 11) NORTH LINF OF SA 11)CARIi.1.ON COl IRTAS SHOWN ON SAID CARILLON PHASE 2A-2 AND CARILLON PHASE 3A-2.AN ADDITION TO I'HE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE ACCORDING 'FO THE; PIAT RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO. D213189966. PLAT RECORDS. TARRA.NT COUNTY, TEXAS. TI IE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTI165 DEGREES 26 MINUTES IS SECONDS EAST.A DISTANCE OF 723.08 FEET TO A 5j'8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER AND THE BEGINNING OF A Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 10 TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 51 SECONDS.A RADIUS OF 531.50 FEET,AND A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 51 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 247.68 FEET: ALONG SAID TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT. CONTTMJING ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CARILLON COURT PASSING AT AN ARC DISTANCE:OF 134.58 FEET A 5:'8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"JACOBS"SET FOR THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF SAID CARILLON. PHASE 3A-2 AND THE NORTHWEST LINE OF CARILLON. PHASE 3A-1.AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE.AS RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO, D213215889, PLAT RECORDS,TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS. CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CARILLON COURT. IN ALL A TOTAL ARC DISTANCE OF 249.99 FEET TO A 5r'8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER A T -THE WEST END OF A CORNER C LIP AT THE: INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CARILLON COURT AVD THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AFORESAID SOUTHMONT DRIVE: THENCE. SOUTH 80 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST.CONTINUING ALONG THE SAID NORTII LINE AND SAID CORNER CLIP,A DISTANCE OF 14.73 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "JACOBS" SET FOR AT THE EASTW END OF SAID CORNER CLIP AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 53 SECONDS.A RADIUS OF 531.50 FEET. AND A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 42 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 265.69 FEET: TIITNCE, ALONG TIIE WEST RIGIIT-OF-WAY I..INT•.OF SAID SOI MfMONT 1)RIVE, TI IE Fi7I..I.0WING Col TR SES AND DISTANCES: ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT.AN ARC DISTANCE OF 268.54 FEET TO A 5r8 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER: SOI TTH 28 DEGREES 10 MINiTTFS 49 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 198.69 FEET TO A 51'9 INCH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "JACOBS" SET FOR CORNER: SOUTH 73 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 28.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,AND CONTAINING 15.355 ACRES OF LAND. MORE OR LESS. Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 11 EXHIBIT "B" Reserved for Approved Development Plan Case No. Attachment E ZA16-029 Page 12