Item 6I 13 CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
August 30, 2016
CASE NO: ZA15-148
PROJECT: Specific Use Permit for Zone Systems, Inc. —Verizon Wireless
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Zone Systems, Inc., on behalf of Verizon Wireless is requesting approval of a
Specific Use Permit for Telecommunications Towers, Antennas, or Ancillary
Structures on property described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll ISD No. 3 Addition,
an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 2400
N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "CS" Community Service
District. SPIN Neighborhood #2.
DETAILS: The project is located next to the west-side bleachers of the sport's field (old
Dragon's stadium) on the Carroll ISD property at the northwest corner of N.
Carroll Ave. and E. Dove Rd. The purpose of the proposed specific use permit
is to allow the erection of a telecommunications monopole that is designed to
replace an existing sport's field lighting pole. The application includes an
approximately 1,080 sq ft equipment compound.
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning CS
Land Use Designation Public/Semi-Public
Height of Existing Light Pole 95 ft
Height of Proposed Monopole Option 1 = 115 ft
Option 2 = 135 ft
Equipment Compound 1,080 sq ft
VARIANCES
REQUESTED: The following variances have been requested in relation to the proposed
specific use permit:
• Variance to landscaping requirement under Zoning Ordinance No.
480, Section 45.7.d.8: The proposed tower facility is located on
property that abuts residential property to the west and north. A
landscape buffer of plant materials around the facility is required. Since
the facility is approximately 400 feet from the nearest residential
property line, the applicant is requesting relief from this requirement.
• Variance to co-location requirement under Zoning Ordinance No.
480, Section 45.7.d.2.b: The proposed Option 1 tower facility does not
allow for additional providers due to the limited space available on the
Case No.
ZA15-148
pole which also serves as a sports field light standard. If the City Council
approves Option 1, this variance will require approval.
• Variance to maximum height requirement under Zoning Ordinance
No. 480, Section 45.7.d.6.b: The proposed Option 2 tower facility is
approximately 135 feet in height. A freestanding tower, that can
accommodate two users, shall not exceed 120 feet in height. If the City
Council approves Option 2, this variance will require approval.
The following details the conditions of approval by P&Z and the applicant's
response:
P&Z Conditions Applicant's Response
Granted the variance to the landscape The applicant continues to propose the
requirement variance. CISD has stated they do not want
the compound landscaped.
Noting the applicant's willingness to The applicant has stated that the wall will
provide matching brick for the match the adjacent buildings in brick color.
compound wall to surrounding buildings
Provide options to show extended The applicant has provided two options for
length for the monopole to the proposed monopole
accommodate an additional provider
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing
2) Consider Approval
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Specific Use Permit Review Summary No. # 5, dated August 11, 2016
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Resolution No. 16-044
(F) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative
Link to Plans
Link to SPIN Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Lorrie Fletcher (817) 748-8069
Case No.
ZA15-148
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Carroll ISD
APPLICANT: Zone Systems, Inc. /Verizon Wireless
PROPERTY SITUATION: The subject property is located at 2400 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake,
Texas.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Carroll ISD Addition 3, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Public / Semi-Public
CURRENT ZONING: "CS" - Community Service District
HISTORY: - A single-lot Plat Showing was processed by staff in 1999 under
Planning Case ZA99-048.
- A Site Plan was approved by City Council on April 17, 1999 under
Planning Case ZA99-059.
- An Amended Plat was processed by staff in 2001 under Planning
Case ZA01-003.
* A Specific Use Permit was approved by City Council on May 17, 2005
to allow a new telecommunications tower of a flag pole structure type
to include equipment compound at the Carroll Senior High School
property located on FM 1709 and Peytonville. In 2006, a Specific Use
Permit was approved by City Council which allowed additional
equipment cabinets and antennas on the existing pole. (See Planning
Case ZA06-084)
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The Southlake 2030 Consolidated Future Land Use Plan designates the
subject property as Public Parks/Open Space. The Future Land Use
Plan defines Public _
Parks/Open Spaces as
public areas designated "
for active and passive 1=
recreation, such as --- L
parks and athletic -
complexes, and public
open space for the \..
preservation of the
scenic vistas and
natural vegetation of the
City. This Land Use
Plan depicts only existing Public Parks/ Open Space facilities; potential
Public Parks/ Open Space sites are illustrated in the Parks, Recreation,
and Open Space Master Plan.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-148 Page 1
Mobility Master Plan
The subject property can be accessed by North Carroll Avenue which is
described as a 70 foot 2-lane undivided collector roadway; and East
Dove Road which is described as an 88 foot 2-lane undivided arterial
roadway. The proposed compound will be accessed from North Carroll
and an internal lessee access and utility easement as shown on the
submitted site plan.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed specific use permit does not affect any existing roadway
conditions.
TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed specific use permit does not affect any existing trees.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held for this project December 8, 2015.
Link to SPIN Report
PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION: August 18, 2016; Approved (4-0) subject to the Staff Report dated
August 12, 2016; granting the requested variance and noting the
applicant's willingness to provide matching brick for the compound
wall to surrounding buildings, and options to show extended
length for the monopole to accommodate an additional provider.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Review Summary No. # 5, dated August 11, 2016.
Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.7.d.8:
8) Landscaping and Screening
The following requirements shall govern the landscaping
surrounding towers; however, in locations where the visual
impact of the tower would be minimal, the landscaping
requirement may be reduced.
a) Existing mature tree growth and natural land forms on the
site shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible.
In some cases, such as towers sited on large, wooded
lots, natural growth around the property perimeter may be
sufficient buffer. Mitigation of any tree removal shall be in
accordance to the Tree Preservation Ordinance, as
amended.
b) Tower facilities (e.g., tower/antennas and any necessary
equipment building) shall be enclosed by an eight (8)
foot, solid screening fence or masonry wall or a wrought
iron fence with an eight (8) foot evergreen hedge, and
shall be landscaped with a buffer of plant materials that
effectively screens the view of the tower compound from
any public roadway or any property used for a residential
purpose. Any fence constructed in accordance with this
section shall provide a knox box or other entry device for
public safety access per the requirements of the Fire
Marshal.
c) Where abutting residentially used land, residentially
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-148 Page 2
zoned property, public land or public streets, or land
designated as low or medium density residential on the
city's Land Use Plan, the applicant shall provide a
screening plan showing the existing tree coverage of the
impacted area and the placement of plantings as required
in a "F2" bufferyard (as a minimum) as described in
Section 42 of this ordinance.
Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.7.d.2.b:
A telecommunication tower must be 1) used by two or more
wireless telecommunications providers; or 2) designed and
built so as to be capable of use by two or more wireless
telecommunications providers and the owner of the antenna
must certify to the City that the tower is available for use by
another wireless telecommunications provider on a
reasonable and non-discriminatory basis.
Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.7.d.6.b:
b) Freestanding Towers
i) For freestanding towers, structurally designed to
accommodate shared users, the following height and
usage criteria shall apply:
for two users, up to one-hundred-twenty (120) feet in
height;
for three users, up to one-hundred-fifty (150) feet in
height.
Variance Criteria for Telecommunications Towers -At the time of
review of any required Concept Plan, the City Council may grant
variances to the development standards set forth in this Section.
a) To receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate the following:
i) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on
surrounding residential properties;
ii) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the
architectural design or creativity of the project; or
iii) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with
surrounding developed properties.
b) In order to grant a variance, the City Council must determine that a
literal enforcement of the regulations will create an unnecessary
hardship or a practical difficulty for the applicant; that the situation
causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to
the affected property and is not self-imposed; that the variance will
not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted
development of adjacent properties; and that the granting of the
variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this
ordinance.
c) If a variance application is denied by the City Council, no other
variance of like kind relating to the same project or proposed project
shall be considered or acted upon by the City Council for a period of
six (6) months subsequent to the denial.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-148 Page 3
Approval Criteria for Specific Use Permits - In granting or denying an
application for a specific use permit, the City Council shall take into
consideration the following factors:
a. Safety of the motoring public and of pedestrians using the
facility and the area immediately surrounding the site.
b. Safety from fire hazard, and measures for fire control.
c. Protection of adjacent property from flood or water damage.
d. Noise producing elements; and glare of vehicular and
stationary lights and effect of such lights on established
character of the neighborhood.
e. Location, lighting and type of signs; and relation of signs to
traffic control and adverse effect on adjacent properties.
f. Street size and adequacy of pavement width for traffic and
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use
around the site and in the immediate neighborhood.
g. Adequacy of parking, as determined by requirements of this
chapter for off-street parking facilities for similar uses; location
of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading
spaces; and protection of the public health by all weather
surfacing on all parking areas to control dust.
h. Such other measures as will secure and protect the public
health, safety, morals and general welfare.
i. City Council may grant variances to specific regulations
associated with a specific use set forth in Sections 45. To
receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate one of the
following (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-MMMM):
(a) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on
surrounding residential properties; or
(b) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the
architectural design or creativity of the project; or 45-
10
(c) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with
surrounding developed properties; or
(d) The proposed construction is an addition to an existing
project that does not meet the requirements of this
ordinance.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-148 Page 4
VICINITY MAP
Vicinity Map
2400 N. Carroll Avenue
Zone Systems Monopole
ff HAT C EK
' 74p1 ti P '� F n4, v 1201 1243 1205 1267
o- 2mpM 20
2z
2' o 0 m 2610
m 2603 RKER Cr 1221
1014
1915
tt54 1194
yQ 4140 7s:A 124p 1234 -N
72�
d3 fl
a_ 5
zoo $
S �
9
4 O
C c7.
ti
740 78;7
. �
E DOVE R❑
825
855 875 925
845 955 975AW1
1ZW
TO 77e 8 C K OR T 1154 1170 11m 1553 11T91211 1 11 1333 6
2759 2155
_ 2723
V6 2779
l'
a- F
ZA 15-'148
Specific Use Permit
;c Ni
0 500 1 DUO 25404
Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZA15-148 Page 1
SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA15-148 Review No.: Five Date of Review: 08/11/16
Project Name: Specific Use Permit— 2400 N. Carroll Avenue
APPLICANT: Zone Systems, Inc. OWNER: Carroll ISD
Peter Kavanagh Matt Miller
1620 Handley Drive 2400 N. Carroll Avenue
Dallas, TX Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: 214-941-4440 Phone: 817-949-8210
Email: peterk@zonesystems.com Email:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/01/16 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SPECIFIC
USE PERMIT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER.
Planning Review
Lorrie Fletcher
Planner I
Phone: (817) 748-8069
Email:lfletcher(a)ci.southlake.tx.us
1. Provide proposed monopole exhibits that have been signed and sealed by appropriate
licensed professional(s). The applicant has indicated that professionally sealed plans will
be provided at permit stage.
2. Provide a detailed landscape plan. The applicant has requested a variance to the
landscaping requirement.
Informational Comments:
Each backhaul provider shall be identified and have all necessary franchises, permits, and
certificates. The identity of other providers who co-locate to the site and their backhaul
providers shall be provided as well.
No lettering, symbols, images, or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of
vehicular traffic on any adjacent roadway shall be placed on, or affixed to, any part of a
telecommunications tower, platform, antenna or ancillary structure.
All construction shall comply with all ordinances of the city not in conflict with Section 45.
In addition to the usual application fees for rezoning or specific use permit requests, the
applicant shall reimburse the city the actual cost of professional services, provided by an
engineer or other professional that may be required to review the application and provide
expertise.
If high voltage is necessary, signs shall be posted every 20' on any exterior fencing which
state, "Danger--High Voltage." The operator shall also post"No Trespassing" signs.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-148 Page 1
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall,
stone, rock or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be
considered a masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath
mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco
finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g.,
EIFS —exterior insulation and finish systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar
characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry material.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must
be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street
Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Prior to permit approval and issuance, provide the city with a certificate of insurance, issued by
an insurance company licensed to do business in the state of Texas indicating that the
applicant carries comprehensive general liability insurance with limits of liability thereunder of
not less than: bodily injury: $500,000 for injury to any one person and $1,000,000 for all
injuries sustained by more than one person in any occurrence; property damage: $1,000,000
for damage as a result of any one accident. The applicant shall provide the city with a renewal
certificate within then (10) business days of each renewal. Any insurance required to be
provided by the applicant herein may be provided by a blanket insurance policy covering this
property and other locations occupied by the applicant, provided such blanket insurance policy
complies with all of the other requirements as to the type and amount of insurance required.
The applicant may also fulfill the requirements under this section through a program of self-
insurance, subject to approval by the city, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
If the applicant elects to self-insure, then the applicant shall furnish the city with a letter stating
that there is a self-insurance program in effect that provides for the same, or greater, coverage
than required of the applicant herein. The applicant agrees to furnish the city with certificate of
insurance certifying that the applicant has in force and affect the above specified insurance.
The certificate and renewal certificates shall provide that insurance shall not be canceled or
changed unless 30 days' prior written notice is just given to the city.
Variances -At the time of review of any required Concept Plan, the City Council may grant
variances to the development standards set forth in Section 45.
a) To receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate the following:
iv) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on surrounding residential
properties;
v) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the architectural design or
creativity of the project; or
vi) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with surrounding developed
properties.
b) In order to grant a variance, the City Council must determine that a literal enforcement
of the regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty for the
applicant; that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is
unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed; that the variance will not injure
and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent
properties; and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and
purpose of this ordinance.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-148 Page 2
c) If a variance application is denied by the City Council, no other variance of like kind
relating to the same project or proposed project shall be considered or acted upon by
the City Council for a period of six (6) months subsequent to the denial.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-148 Page 3
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
-40
, av
�i
A
F ,W
Y
3 s
t
•J.CR�MF Q �-y�- ,i, iir . r �
Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response
1. OGDEN, RYAN J SF1-A 2603 S QUAIL RUN CT 1.02 NR
2. HALBROOKS, CHRISTOPHER T SF1-A 2604 S QUAIL RUN CT 1.02 NR
3. LOGAN, MARK SF1-A 2602 N CARROLL AVE 1.05 U
4. TACKER, PAUL W RPUD 2603 N CARROLL AVE 0.61 NR
5. SEWELL, DERYL R SF1-A 2601 S QUAIL RUN CT 1.20 O
6. GONSER, CHRISTOPHER SF1-A 955 E DOVE RD 1.97 NR
7. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 2300 N CARROLL AVE 0.10 NR
8. MOORE, WYNNE P RPUD 2601 N CARROLL AVE 0.60 NR
9. NANDHA,TARANB S SF1-A 1100 TAYLOR ST 0.90 NR
10. ZIPFEL,THOMAS J SF1-A 1120 TAYLOR ST 1.26 NR
11. WALTON, DARON SF1-A 2409 N CARROLL AVE 1.11 NR
12. HERRERA, ANTONIO SF1-A 2407 N CARROLL AVE 1.11 NR
13. BENKENDORF, BRANDON G SF1-A 2405 N CARROLL AVE 1.12 NR
14. SHINER,TIM SF1-A 2403 N CARROLL AVE 1.11 O
15. COTTON, BILLY SF1-A 2401 N CARROLL AVE 1.12 NR
16. TRINH, BRYAN SF1-A 1150 E DOVE RD 1.33 NR
17. GIST, GREG L SP1 2379 N CARROLL AVE 0.93 NR
18. MILLER, MICHAEL SF1-A 1055 E DOVE RD 2.35 NR
19. SHAH, SANJIV RPUD 1004 WINFIELD CT 0.44 NR
20. YOLPAK, CHIDTRAPOL RPUD 1001 WINFIELD CT 0.50 NR
21. LOWENSTEIN, GREG AG 925 E DOVE RD 1.57 NR
22. ANDERSON, STEVEN SF1-A 975 E DOVE RD 1.99 NR
23. MARTINEZ,ALEXANDER SF1-A 2600 N CARROLL AVE 1.00 NR
24. THANE,JOHN SF1-A 2600 S QUAIL RUN CT 1.05 F
25. HUTCHINSON, MARK A SF1-A 2602 S QUAIL RUN CT 1.23 NR
26. HARRIS,TODD SF1-A 1005 QUAIL RUN RD 2.00 NR
27. GONZALEZ, RACHEL RPUD 2404 OAK BEND CT 0.51 NR
28. KOLB, MICHAEL RPUD 2412 OAK BEND CT 0.53 NR
29. HARGROVE, MATTHEW RPUD 2408 OAK BEND CT 0.47 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-148 Page 1
30. OAK BEND OF SOUTHLAKE HOA RPUD 2350 OAK BEND CT 1.14 NR
31. OAK BEND OF SOUTHLAKE HOA RPUD 2351 OAK BEND CT 0.41 NR
32. FAULKNER, MARTY RPUD 2420 OAK BEND CT 0.48 NR
33. CARROLL, ISD CS 2400 N CARROLL AVE 28.22 NR
34. WILSON, LAWRENCE RPUD 2517 OAK BEND CT 0.50 NR
35. GILL, SANDEEP S RPUD 2513 OAK BEND CT 0.50 NR
36. KM PROPERTIES INC RPUD 2509 OAK BEND CT 0.49 NR
37. HUSSAIN, SYED RPUD 2501 OAK BEND CT 0.52 NR
38. OAK BEND OF SOUTHLAKE HOA RPUD 2421 OAK BEND CT 0.72 NR
39. H CREEK DEVELOPMENT LLC RPUD 2505 OAK BEND CT 0.47 NR
40. KM PROPERTIES INC RPUD 2400 OAK BEND CT 0.54 NR
41. MAYKUS CUSTOM HOMES, INC RPUD 2417 OAK BEND CT 0.48 NR
42. OAK BEND OF SOUTHLAKE HOA RPUD 2512 OAK BEND CT 0.22 NR
43. SYED, WAOAR RPUD 2521 OAK BEND CT 0.49 NR
44. WINFIELD RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY RPUD 1028 WINFIELD CT 1.36 NR
45. MADHANI, SALEEM RPUD 1000 WINFIELD CT 0.51 NR
Notices Sent: Forty-five (45)
Responses Received within 200': Four (4) See Attached
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-148 Page 2
Notification Response Form
ZA15-945
Mae"nate:August 11B, 2016 at 0:33 PM
SE ELL DERYL R
2001 6 QUAIL RUN CT
SOUTH LAKE.TQC 78092
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORM VIA IML, FAX OR MANO IXLIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUMIO HEARING.
Being the owner(s)at t[4ia p-aperty so nod above, are hereby
in favor of Co Pos�to undecided about
(drde or undedine one)
the prapa5ed Specific Permit referenced agave.
Spare ice'c-ommentt regarding your poaftion,
�.
_ AX.
1/"v-w gOW�,Z4V ul&j-dA
Signature: Date:
AdditionalSignature: Date:
Printed Name(s): ark
Musa �rcp_ity•�„rtcr(a}vA�ec 2nami—p-5
0 top, 00rxise wnmc#m Punning E pwxnwd. Ow corm W54�IrtY.
Phone Nurnber (o hona1): _ - q
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-148 Page 3
Notification Response Form
FA15-14B
meeting Date: August 18, 2016 at 6:30 RM
SHINER, TiM
737 BANDIT TR
KELLER, TX 76248
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owiner(s) of th prGpe- noted above, are hereby
rouppowoUa"'
in favor of undecided about
(circle or underline ane)
the proposed Specific Use Permit referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Vic 1e
i
Signature' Date:
k
Additional Signature: Date:
Printed Name(s):
taw be pmvefty owmr{a}whope rwma{s)vire pf sd at lop. Qtherr ise oonteci the?Lending deps*mnl. one form per property.
Phone Number (optional)- kemvoau
J r
1M n2nrf non.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-148 Page 4
Notifi atiori Response Form
7A15-140
Meeting Data. August t8.1016 at 6'30 PM
LOGAN, MARK
2602 N CARROLL AVE
$OUTHLAKE. TQC 76092
PLEASE FtOR DT E STIS ] LkYERY
BEF
ART OF THE CHE13U EPUBLIC Hr=ARI NG
Being the owner(s) of the prtaperty so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or Linderiine one)
the proposed :Specific Use Permit referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
it appears that the pole to he installed is not the same shape or size as the
one that is proposed to be replaced. Is there a way ta- maintain the aesthetic
similiarity ,with the existing light poles? With the addition of ;m transmitter
tower, whart affect will this have on existing cellular recep#lorr? Have arwy
field studies been aorrtmii5sioned4 to determine the impact an teievislon, radio
or ce u ar rec on
signature'
Date. AHS.9. 20116
11ste: Aug9. �f�"i0
Additional ignature:
Panted Name(s): Mark Lagan and Kathryn Logan
Mual be pro[eflY ov.mi(s)whose i m w ars Pte+ jpttap. Otherwis;a cantiatha Plannerp I7e�artr+*9nt. Dn �
Phone Number (optional): $17-401-19 s AUG 11 X16
"WNVP Den
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-148 Page 5
M/15/16 17:10:BB 817 —3112 —> 61-614th HTi .7ulni 71kcnc Fagg noz
Notifica#w Response Form
rt darts araf grail respcmw toy
ZAIS-148 City OFSou#Aaioa
pA9491ma Dato:AU9=118.2010 at 0:30 PM PhwK6119&DwvWbprMwd*Sa"k=
Nodficullvn ftesportm
14w OMD 54 ato
?MANE.Jf9FiN Saulhlxim,TQC 7612
2600 8 QUAL RUN CT PhaM: (617)UNWal
SOUTILAKE,TX 76t]02 f4 . pt
PLEASE PROV113E CDWLIFTED FORMS VIA-RWM, FAKOR HAND DEE ERY
BEFORE THE START OF THIS SCHEDULED PUBUC HEARING.
Being tIfa7vorogif
of the property bq noted above, are hereby
inopposedto undecided about
(i -cle or underlineenc,)
the propnsed Specific U:se Perms, referenoed Above.
Space for comments mgarding your pciition.
!L�I—)EL .. 2- D.iAf::t-'FL"T UO)"D -
UR -9VRh2K-L—
nate -- — - Date:� a
Additional ftnatufe, L" . Date: L ---J�
Printed ame(3): -
Mum�".mw:MMU(1)*.74 M M*W ahl at ft, oI11�cunw die M*lplih�DRIMIUkTA 0,*WhS W pgtpoft'.
AUG i r.. 2016
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-148 Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 16-044
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT
FOR A TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER, ANTENNAS AND
ANCILLARY BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, LOCATED AT 2400 NORTH CARROLL
AVENUE, BEING DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARROLL
ISD NO. 3 ADDITION, SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE EXHIBIT
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS
EXHIBIT "A" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for Telecommunications Tower, Antennas and
Ancillary Buildings has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary
interest in property zoned as "CS" Community Service District; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45.1 (30) and 45.7 of the
City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City
Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the
persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such
Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for a telecommunication tower, antennas and
ancillary buildings on property located at 2400 North Carroll Avenue, being described as Lot
4, Block 1 , Carroll ISD No. 3 Addition as depicted on the approved Site Exhibit attached
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" and providing an effective date, subject to the
provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-148 Page 1
herein.
SECTION 2.
This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS th DAY OF
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
By:
Laura Hill
Mayor
ATTEST:
Lori Payne, TRMC
City Secretary
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-148 Page 2
EXHIBIT `A"
Plans and Support Information
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-148 Page 3