Loading...
2016-07-26 Meeting Report (Ord 480 and 483) SPIN MEETING REPORT Case Number: SPIN16-23 Project Name: Proposed amendments to both Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 SPIN Neighborhood: Citywide Meeting Date: July 26, 2016 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Four (4) Host: Randy Robbins, Community Engagement Committee ApplicantPresenting: David Jones, Principal Planner City Staff Present: David Jones, Principal Planner, Dennis Killough, DeputyDirector of Planning and Development Services, Steven Anderson, Deputy City Engineer; Jerod Potts, Planner I; Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I Attached to the end of this report are the Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the July 26, 2016 SPIN Town Hall Forum Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.comand clicking on “Learn More” under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPINby meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Development Details: Sustainability Plan adopted as part of the Southlake 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Contains prioritized recommendations to maximize the efficient use of public resources Creek Buffer –Tier 1 recommendation of Sustainability Plan Intention is to reduce erosion, preserve habitat, increase open space, and o minimize impacts from site development and increases in impervious coverage Benefits of creek buffer is they can be used as nonstructural stormwater o filtering and infiltration zones, keepsstructures outofthe floodplain, provides ROWfor large flood events, and helps preserve riparian ecosystems and habitats This ties back in to the adopted Integrated Stormwater Management Manual o (iSWM) –another recommendation from the Sustainability Plan to adopt recommendations within that document Proposed amendmentsto Ord. No. 480(stream/creek buffer): Allow bufferyard credit on property boundary containing buffer or on o boundaries parallel to the buffer Allow 1 for 1 treecredit for saving native trees within the border o For sites that have a meandering stream or a stream that runs diagonally o through the site the credit would work differently Proposed amendments to Ord. No. 480(permeable pavement): Consider incentivizing permeable pavement (such as credits toward o impervious coverage limitations)–Tier 2 Recommendation in Sustainability Master Plan Benefitsof permeable pavement include: reducesstormwater runoff, o allows rainfallto percolateinto the soil rather than sheetflowing into waterways, reducessurfacetemperatures, and reducespooling of water during rain events Permeable concrete and asphalt would be allowed to serve as anoffset if o a developer wishes to increase impervious coverage over the maximum that is allowed Ordinance amendment would allow for up to a 5% increase in that o maximum impervious coverage if a minimum amount of permeable surface is used Ordinance would also add a definition for permeable pavement and it o would allow permeable pavers to be approvedon a case by case basis Systems using grass or gravel would not quality as a permeable all- o weather surface Exhibits presented at SPIN: QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: None SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made.Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant.Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the July 26, 2016SPIN Meeting