Item 7 - ZA16-047 SP The MarqCASE NO:
PROJECT:
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
CITY OF
S0UTHLA1<,.,.,E
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
July 29, 2016
ZA16-047
Site Plan for The Marq Southlake Champions Club
Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture Inc., on behalf of the City of Southlake is
requesting approval of a Site Plan for The Marq Southlake Champions Club on
property described as Tract 3C and portions of Tracts 3C1 and 3C1A, L.G. Hall
Survey, Abstract No. 686, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located
at 315, 275 & 285 Shady Oaks Dr., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "CS"
Community Service District. SPIN Neighborhood #7.
DETAILS: The project is generally located at the southwest corner of Bicentennial Park
adjacent to Shady Oaks Drive. Construction for Phase 1, named Legends Hall,
was completed in December 2015.
Phase 2, named Champions Club, is
proposed to be approximately 84,000 square feet and include spaces for
fitness, performance training, gymnasium,
indoor jog/walk track, indoor
aquatics, indoor playground, party
rooms, child watch and multipurpose
classrooms for programs.
Site Data
Summary
Legends Hall
Champions Club Total
Existing Zoning CS
CS CS
Land Use Public Parks /
Public Parks / Open Public Parks / Open
Designation Open Space
Space Space
Gross Project 6.4 Acres
Acreage
4.75 Acres 11.15 Acres
Gross Floor Area 22,408 sq ft
84,070 sq ft 106,478
Building Height Max 31 feet
Max 35 feet N/A
Number of Stories 1 story
2 stories
Parking 186 83 269 Marq / 965
remainder of Park
VARIANCES
REQUESTED: The following variances are being requested in relation to the proposed
development:
1) Variance to driveway stacking depth under Driveway Ordinance
No. 634, Section 5.2(d): A minimum stacking depth of 100 feet is
required at this location. The proposed driveway off Shady Oaks drive
onto the property proposes a stacking depth of approximately 27'/2 feet.
Case No.
ZA16-047
2) Variance to lighting type under Lighting Ordinance No. 693-C,
Section 4: Permitted lighting types shall be high pressured sodium
lights or neutral or warm correlated color temperature Light Emitting
Diode LED lights. The applicant is requesting to install metal halide or
LED lights that exceed maximum allowed temperature range.
3) Variance to the intensity of illumination under Lighting Ordinance
No. 693-C, Section 5: The maximum outdoor computed or measured
illumination level on a property shall not exceed 20 foot candles
outdoors at any point. The applicant is exceeding this threshold at the
new sports fields being proposed.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing
2) Consider Approval
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. # 3, dated July 28, 2016
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative
Link to Plans
Page 1 - Site Plan
Pages 2 — 4 - Landscape Plan
Page 5 - Tree Conservation Plan
Pages 7 — 10 - Elevations
Pages 11 — 15 - Civils
Link to Lighting Reports
Link to Traffic Impact Analysis
Link to SPIN meeting Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Chris Tribble (817) 748-8021
Lorrie Fletcher (817) 748-8069
Case No.
ZA16-047
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: City of Southlake
APPLICANT: Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION: The project is generally located at the southwest corner of Bicentennial
Park adjacent to Shady Oaks Drive: 315, 275 & 285 Shady Oaks Dr.,
Southlake, Texas.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 3C and portions of Tracts 3C1 and 3C1A, L.G. Hall Survey,
Abstract No. 686, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Public Parks / Open Space
CURRENT ZONING: "CS" — Community Service District
HISTORY: - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan was approved by City Council
on February 15, 1994 under Planning Case ZA94-001.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan was approved by City Council on
July 18, 2000 under Planning Case ZA00-064.
- A Revised Site Plan for shade structures built over spectator seating
was approved by City Council on June 5, 2001 under Planning Case
ZA01-052.
- A Revised Site Plan for improvements to the maintenance facility
and shade structures for the maintenance facility was approved by
City Council on September 4, 2001 under Planning Case ZA01-090.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan to add 13.14 acres to the park
property and to construct a clock tower was approved by City
Council on March 5, 2002 under Planning Case ZA01-126.
- A Plat Revision for the park was approved by City Council on March
5, 2002 under Planning Case ZA01-137.
- A Revised Site Plan to construct a learning pavilion in the Liberty
Garden area of the park was approved by City Council on October 7,
2003 under Planning Case ZA03-067.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan was approved by City Council on
November 18, 2008 to add approximately 7 acres to the park and
construct Phase I of the master planned park under Planning Case
ZA08-078.
- A Site Plan to do improvements to Bicentennial Park surrounding the
historical Log Cabin was approved by City Council on April 7, 2009
under Planning Case ZA09-002.
- A Site Plan was approved by City Council on September 18, 2012
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-047 Page 1
for Bicentennial Park Phase II under Planning Case ZA12-057.
- A Site Plan was approved by City Council on June 3, 2014 for the
Southlake Community Recreation Center Phase I (Legends Hall)
under Planning Case ZA14-062.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The Southlake 2030 Consolidated Future Land Use Plan designates the
subject property as Public Parks/Open Space. The Future Land Use
Plan defines Public Parks/Open Spaces as public areas designated for
active and passive recreation, such as parks and athletic complexes,
and public open space -
for the preservation of HI
the scenic vistas and -77-77]
natural vegetation of the _
City. This Land Use - -
Plan depicts only --
existing Public Parks/ �Ir
Open Space facilities; -
potential Public Parks/ - _--
Open Space sites are
illustrated in the Parks,
Recreation, and Open
Space Master Plan.
Parks. Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Master Plan
In the Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Community Facilities Master
Plan a number of recommendations were adopted related to
Bicentennial Park. In relation to this specific request, a community
recreation center facility was recommended to be adopted into the
master plan at Bicentennial Park at the location that is currently being
proposed. The recommendation in the Parks, Recreation & Open
Space/ Community Facilities Master Plan reads as follows:
"6. Provide a Multipurpose -Facility with an amphitheater on the
southwest portion of the park. "
IME BICENTENNIAL PARK t
PlIfililConceptual MasterPlan
The applicant's proposed site plan request is consistent with the
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-047 Page 2
adopted Bicentennial Park Master Plan and also the recommendation
within the Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Community Facilities
Master Plan.
Mobilitv Master Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan within the City's Mobility Master Plan
designates Shady Oaks Drive as a 60 -foot (C2U) undivided collector
roadway.
The Master Pathways Plan requires that a minimum 6 -foot sidewalk be
provided along both sides of Shady Oaks Drive. Currently, there is an
existing partial sidewalk along Shady Oaks Drive and proposed
sidewalk construction for the remaining piece that will comply with the
master plan.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed project is located on the north side of Southlake Blvd. in
the southwest quadrant of the existing Bicentennial Park complex
between White Chapel Blvd. and Shady Oaks Dr. The site is bordered to
the south by retail development along Southlake Blvd.; to the east by
the north -south pond/water feature within the park; to the west by Shady
Oaks Dr.; and to the north by Unity Way, the east -west spine road
through the park. The roadways will provide direct access to the site via
existing and proposed driveways from Shady Oaks Dr. and Unity Way.
The southern -most driveway into the project from Shady Oaks Dr. is
proposed to be removed and an alternate driveway, as shown on the
proposed site plan, is to be constructed.
Shady Oaks Dr. is described as a two-lane undivided 70 foot collector
roadway.
Traffic Counts
24hr North Bound (2,104) South Bound (2,015)
AM Peak AM (335) 7:30-8:30 AM Peak AM (196) 7:45-8:45 AM
PM Peak PM (202) 3:00-4:00 PM Peak PM (266) 3:45-4:45 PM
" Based on the (2015) City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
A traffic impact analysis dated September 30, 2014 was submitted for
review with The Marq Phase 1 (Legends Hall). The TIA assumed
complete development of all Phases of The Marq. The
recommendations are to adjust the signal timing on the Shady
Oaks/Southlake Boulevard signal and construct a right turn lane at the
primary entrance (northern most entrance on Shady Lane). - Link to TIA
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-047 Page 3
The ITE trip generation rates far Recreational Comnliunity� Center are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: ITE Trip Generation Rates far IIE Recreational Community Center
Lund -Use
Average Weekdav
All Peak Hour PNI Peak Hour
Rates]
In J Chit Total In Glut Total
1,759 1,749 3,518
IIE
Average
ASI Peak
PM Peak
Saturday
Saturday
Description
473 473 946
60 51 111
Cade
Weekday
Hour
Hour
Daily
Peak Hour
Recreational C'omrnunity Center 495
T = 33.83*X
T=2_05'X
T='_74*X
T = 9.1*X
T = 1.01*X
Directional Splits
50° d in i
66% in r
49% in f
50% in r`
54% in
50°b Out
34% out
51°'u Out
50% out
46% out
-T = Trips Ends; X = 1,D09 square ;eel
Based on the size of the CRC. the number of trills predicted to be generated on a weekday and a
Sattirdayr were estimated and are shown in Table 2.
Table 1: ITE Estimated Irip Generation
Average Weekdav
All Peak Hour PNI Peak Hour
Sine
InOut Total
In J Chit Total In Glut Total
1,759 1,749 3,518
141 I ,2 I ?13 140 143 84
Saturday Daily-
Saturday Peak Houi
104.000 f#'
In Out Total
In Out Total
473 473 946
60 51 111
TREE PRESERVATION: Development of public Community Service (CS) zoned properties are
subject to the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. All
protected trees that must be altered to construct the required and
permitted improvements based on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan are exempted from the tree replacement and
protection requirements of this section. Such improvements may
include building pads, required parking areas, driveways, fire lanes,
streets, and required utility and drainage infrastructure that are required
by City ordinances and have been approved by the appropriate boards
or officers of the City.
The proposed existing tree cover preservation falls slightly short of
complying with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Regulations of the
Tree Preservation Ordinance. But, if the one (1) proposed "Borderline"
tree is preserved the preservation would comply. The existing tree cover
is 16.1% and 70% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved.
If the "Borderline" tree is removed the remaining existing tree cover
would be 68.7%, and if the "Borderline" tree is preserved the existing
tree cover preservation would be 71.8%.
UTILITIES: Utilities exist for this project within the site that were constructed with
The Marq Phase 1 (Legends Hall). Service connections and some
additional fire hydrants are all that will be required with The Marq —
Champions Club.
DRAINAGE: Storm drainage was accounted for with the design of the Marq Phase 1.
An existing detention pond will receive the stormwater runoff and control
the release into the downstream system.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-047 Page 4
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held for this project on May 10, 2016. A link to the
report is provided. Link to SPIN Report
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Review Summary No. # 3, dated July 28, 2016.
Variance Approval Criteria for Lighting Ordinance No. 693-C:
SEC TIClti1 10.
APPEALS; VARIANCES; MODIFIC:ATIONS
(a) A person may request a modification or variance from the provisions of this
Ordinance. The person shall subluit an application for a variance to the building
official on forms prescribed by the building official.
(b) A person who is dissatisfied with the decision of the building official may file an
appeal. The person may file an appeal not more than 10 days after the
deternl.u'lation of the building official. The person shall submit ail appeal to the
building official on forms prescribed by the building official.
(C) The city council. after receiving a recommendation front the planning and zoning
commission, may grant a modification or valiance fi•om the provisions of this
Ordinance in any of the following circumstances:
(1) Upon finding that strict application of the Ordinance would not foilvard
the purposes of this Ordinance. or that alternatives proposed by the
applicant would satisfy the purposes of this Ordinance at least to an
equivalent degree.
(2) Upon fn7ding that an outdoor light.. or system of outdoor lights required
for a particular use cannot reasonably comply with the standard and
provide sufficient illumination for safety or security.. as determined by
recon-unended practices adopted by the Il ianliliating Engineering Society
of North American for the particular use or other evidence submitted by a
professional engineer or other professional organization.
(3) Upon finding where a literal application or enforcement of the regulations
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship and the relief
granted would not be contrary to the public interest or the latent but do
substantial justice and be in accordance with the spirit of the regulations
and this Ordinance.
(d) The city council may impose such conditions on a modification or variance which
it deems appropriate to further the puilaoses of this Ordinance.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-047 Page 5
Variance Approval Criteria for Driveway Ordinance No. 634:
880 MODIFICATIONS - VARIA.NCI&S AND APPEALS
8.1 MODIFICATIONS: Modifications may be granted by the Director for the particular area
of responsibility controlled by such official under unique circumstances whenever needed
to recognize extenuating oircumstances or preserve the health, safety and welfare of the
public, and provided the modifications provide the same degree of protection, and
provided that the modifications are iau conformity with the intent and purpose of this
ordinance. The director may defer any request by an applicant to the City Council for
final detcrmination.
8.2 VARIANCES AND APPEALS: Any applicant who desires a variance or elimination of
the requirements herein, or who desires to appeal a decision of the Director regarding
modifications to this ordinance shall file a written appeal to the Director who shall place
the request on the agenda for consideration by the City Council. The City Council shall
have the authority to grant a variance to this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City
Couneis shall determine that a literal enforcement of the regulations herein will create an
unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing
unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not
self-impostd, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use
and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the varia=
will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance.'I'he decision of the City
Council shall be final.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-047 Page 6
313
LTA Is] IkiIIvaLY, /_1a
Vicinity ity Mai]
The Marq 5outhlake Champions Club
7 17 713
m
I SU
h4D e20
ec-0 0a
F.M. 1709
0
470
ZA 16-047
Site Plan
485 818
1 620
Feet.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-047 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA16-047 Review No.: Three
Project Name: Site Plan — The Marq Southlake — Champions Club
APPLICANT: City of Southlake
Department of Community Services
Kate Meacham
Phone: 817-748-8018
Email: kmeacham@ci.southlake.tx.us
Date of Review: 07/28/16
ENGINEER: Pacheco Koch
Javier Jaramillo - Phone: 972-235-3031
Email: jjaramillo@pkce.com
ARCHITECT: Barker Rinker Seacat Arch.
Kip Jameson — Phone: 214-223-0477
Email: kipjameson@brsarch.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/22/16 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FI IRTHFR r:I A"ATInI\I PI FASF r;nNTAr.T THF APPRnPRIATF STAFF MFMRFR
Planning Review
Lorrie Fletcher
Planner I
Phone: (817) 748-8069
Email:Ifletcher(a).ci.south lake. tx.us
1. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type
of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. Variances have been requested.
2. Stacking is measured from the right of way line to the first turning movement. The stacking
depth, as submitted, appears to be approximately 27.4 feet. The Driveway Ordinance requires
a minimum of 100 feet of stacking depth for the proposed driveway onto Shady Oaks Drive for
this location. A variance has been requested.
3. Relocate the trees that are shown at the driveway entrance; they cannot be located within the
sight triangle.
The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may
benefit and does not represent a requirement.
Staff recommends providing a materials sample board.
All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. I think the "Proposed Preserved Tree Cover Including `Borderline' Trees" and the "Proposed
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-047 Page 1
Tree Cover not including `Borderline' Trees" calculations need to be switched. The "Proposed
Preserved Tree Cover Including `Borderline' Trees" should be greater than the "Proposed Tree
Cover Not Including `Borderline' Trees."
2. Provide the corresponding tree identification numbers in the tree table on the existing trees.
Development of public Community Service (CS) zoned properties are subject to the
regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. All protected trees that must be altered to
construct the required and permitted improvements based on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan are exempted from the tree replacement and protection requirements of
this section. Such improvements may include building pads, required parking areas,
driveways, fire lanes, streets, and required utility and drainage infrastructure that are required
by City ordinances and have been approved by the appropriate boards or officers of the City.
The proposed existing tree cover preservation falls slightly short of complying with the Existing
Tree Cover Preservation Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. But, if the one (1)
proposed "Borderline" tree is preserved the preservation would comply. The existing tree cover
is 16.1 % and 70% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. If the "Borderline" tree
is removed the remaining existing tree cover would be 68.7%, and if the "Borderline" tree is
preserved the existing tree cover preservation would be 71.8°/x.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of
existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the
minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0%-20% 70%
20.1 —40% 60%
40.1%-60% 50%
60.1%-80% 40%
80.1%-100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction
of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved
on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and
the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all
structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be
constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
Provide the required west bufferyard, and label the bufferyards on the Site Plan and
Landscape Plan. There will be only a west and south bufferyards. The west bufferyard is a 10'
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-047 Page 2
— E, and the south bufferyard is a 5' — A. The length of the bufferyards would be only the
length of the phase of construction.
2. The Seasonal Color calculations are incorrect.
3. Provide the required Canopy Tree and associated parking lot landscaping at the ends of each
row of parking.
4. Change the Texas Mountain Laurel to another accent tree. If not in a protected area they will
freeze.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson(c,ci.southlake.tx.us
* No Comments
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements(a-)ci.south lake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located
on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet
from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of
5'X5' if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is on the riser.
The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire
hydrant. (A remote FDC is acceptable to meet the requirement)
Hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations that contain
fully sprinklered buildings. (Due to the FDC regulation listed above, an additional fire hydrant
will be needed on the north side of the building to meet the spacing requirements)
Community Service/Parks Department Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
Case No.
ZA16-047
Attachment C
Page 3
Phone: (817) 748-8607
E-mail: pkao(@ci.southlake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee
payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further
details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
None required for park development.
Pathway Comments:
Sidewalk at Shady Oaks south entrance on south side needs adjustment to match north side.
No access from Shady Oaks to pond along south side of property.
Additional parking on east side of pond must provide adequate ADA parking and access. Additional
parking at north ballfields must provide ADA access to building.
Other informational comments?
Radius on south side of south entrance is not rounded adequately. Will become a wheel bumper at
pedestrian ramp. Offset intersection at this location with adjacent retail traffic may create confusion
and bottlenecks. Review stacking depth from parking lot intersection and Shady Oaks entrance.
Provide traffic control signage and plan.
Alignment of sewer line should be straightened/adjusted and only another single manhole added at
main line. Alignment runs too close to building pad and piers.
Location of water meter is under/inside fence. Move outside/away from fencing and mowstrip.
Inlet along east side of Shady Oaks and storm pipe appear to be undersized — Shady Oaks future
plans? Grading at this location is not correct either. Drainage plan at this location does not show flow
numbers
Traffic Impact Analysis worksheet not provided
Drainage plan does not address runoff at pond pump house.
Signage plan not provided.
Common access agreement and separate instrument with adjacent property owner needs to be
provided.
Case No.
ZA16-047
Attachment C
Page 4
Informational Comments:
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall,
stone, rock or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be
considered a masonry material when applied using a 3 -step process over diamond metal lath
mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco
finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g.,
EIFS —exterior insulation and finish systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar
characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry material.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21,
Building Color Standards for Non -Residential Buildings.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-047 Page 5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
POWELL, TIMOTHY
CAMPBELL, JOHN E
NATHAN, FRANCIS
PILLOW, TIMOTHY
BABU, VIJAYABALAN
FINDLAY, KATHERINE
REED, JAMISON P
DORAN,TJ
RAY, ANDREW L
GAMAN, WALTER L
MAZUREK, PIOTR
TAYLOR, NICHAOLS
ZITNIK, JAMES K
MCBRIDE, GREGORY
DAVIS, LINDSAY
BURGESS, RIEL
FERNANDEZ, RAUL A
MEDIATE, V S
WELCH, DAVID E
CRITTENDON, JOE C
JEFFERIES, LAN BUI
STEFANKO, EDWARD P
SCHEER, CARY E
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
Case No.
ZA16-047
=%714
Zoning
I Address
Acreage
Response
SF1-A
455 LOVE HENRY CT
1.88
NR
SF1-A
495 LOVE HENRY CT
1.80
NR
SF1-A
535 LOVE HENRY CT
1.95
NR
SF1-A
575 LOVE HENRY CT
1.92
NR
SF1-A
615 LOVE HENRY CT
1.92
NR
SF20A
560 TRUELOVE TRL
0.72
NR
SF20A
540 OAK HILL DR
0.47
NR
SF20A
545 BRIARRIDGE RD
0.47
NR
SF20A
540 BRIARRIDGE RD
0.46
NR
SF20A
545 TRUELOVE TRL
0.47
NR
SF20A
545 OAK HILL DR
0.46
NR
SF20A
100 GREEN OAKS LN
0.58
NR
SF20A
340 GREEN OAKS LN
0.69
NR
SF20A
120 GREEN OAKS LN
0.47
NR
SF20A
140 GREEN OAKS LN
0.45
NR
SF20A
160 GREEN OAKS LN
0.45
NR
SF20A
200 GREEN OAKS LN
0.46
NR
SF20A
220 GREEN OAKS LN
0.45
NR
SF20A
240 GREEN OAKS LN
0.46
NR
SF20A
260 GREEN OAKS LN
0.45
NR
SF20A
300 GREEN OAKS LN
0.46
NR
SF20A
320 GREEN OAKS LN
0.47
NR
SF1-A
902 EMERALD BLVD
1.07
NR
CS
1.04
NR
CS
4.97
NR
CS
300 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
10.29
NR
Attachment D
Page 1
HARVEY, ROBERT
SF1-A
901 EMERALD BLVD
1.06
NR
WHITNEY, SCOTT
SF1-A
803 PEARL DR
0.97
NR
Current Owner, Current Owner
SF1-A
805 PEARL DR
1.00
NR
INLAND WESTERN SLAKE SUNTREE
SP2
110 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.90
NR
TEAL, SUZANNE
SF1-A
902 SAN SABA DR
1.00
NR
SHARIF, NAZMA
SF1-A
900 SAN SABA DR
1.03
NR
HATAWAY, WILLIAM
SF1-A
901 SAN SABA DR
1.00
NR
GARCIA, MANUEL F
SF1-A
900 EMERALD BLVD
0.98
NR
STEPHENS, JOHN
SF1-A
903 SAN SABA DR
0.94
NR
SDPP LLC
C2
465 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.70
NR
JAMES LANDSCAPING INC
SF1-A
430 SHADY OAKS DR
3.22
NR
WALL, CRAIG S
SF30
713 EDWARD CT
0.69
NR
BACKLUND, MICHAEL A
SF30
709 EDWARD CT
1.09
NR
JOHNSON, STEVEN
SF20A
707 EDWARD CT
0.6S
NR
GRIFFIN, GILBERT
SF20A
703 EDWARD CT
0.64
O
HIGHBERGER, RHONDA
SF1-A
310 SHADY OAKS DR
1.10
NR
STACY, RANDALL W
SF1-A
300 SHADY OAKS DR
0.98
NR
STACY, RONALD T
SF1-A
330 SHADY OAKS DR
1.04
NR
STACY, ROY J EST
SF1-A
320 SHADY OAKS DR
5.61
NR
SOUTHLAKE OAKS LLC
C2
500 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
2.53
NR
BANK OF THE OZARKS
SP1
600 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
1.05
NR
WAYLAND, MARCUS
AG
427 SHADY OAKS DR
4.96
NR
SDPP LLC
C2
475 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.73
NR
TERRA/STRATFORT LP
C2
445 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
1.02
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
379 SHADY OAKS DR
1.35
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
315 SHADY OAKS DR
5.15
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
285 SHADY OAKS DR
7.14
NR
SOUTHLAKE OAKS II LLC
C2
480 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
2.19
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
275 SHADY OAKS DR
3.88
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
400 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD
9.57
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
379 SHADY OAKS DR
2.88
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
2.14
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
7.76
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
11.37
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
379 SHADY OAKS DR
1.51
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
1.10
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
470 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
2.14
NR
PARKHILL & WRIGHT LLC
01
301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.14
NR
IMAN, ASHER S
01
301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.16
NR
321 SOUTHLAKE BLVD REAL ESTATE
01
301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.13
NR
TY SHAFER DDS PA
01
301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.26
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
450 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.66
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
4.50
NR
WHITE HOUSE EXE CENTER LP
SP1
410 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
1.60
NR
GTE SOUTHWEST INC
CS
400 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.43
NR
CLARDY-RUFFNER
C2
425 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.91
NR
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
1.58
NR
BICENTENNIAL FIN CENTER LP
SP2
250 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
1.17
NR
Case No.
Attachment D
ZA16-047
Page 2
75.
INLAND WESTERN SLAKE SUNTREE
SP2
100 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
7.74
NR
76.
SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF
CS
2.89
NR
77.
FIRST AMERICAN SAVINGS BANC
SP2
222 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
1.17
NR
78.
WV PROPERTIES LLC
SP1
351 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
2.00
NR
79.
MAHALO INVESTMENTS LLC
01
301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
1.63
NR
80.
01
301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.20
NR
81.
SOUTHLAKE SHADY OAKS BUILDINGS
SP1
620 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.99
NR
82.
SOUTHLAKE SHADY OAKS BUILDINGS
SP1
640 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
1.14
NR
83.
ENERGY VAULT A47 LLC
SP1
660 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.86
NR
84.
CADG GLENMORE LLC
SF1-A
800 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
19.71
NR
85.
FOUNTAIN FIVE ZERO TWO TR
AG
250 SHADY OAKS DR
10.22
NR
86.
LECHLER, GLORIA ETAL
01
130 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD
7.35
NR
Notices Sent: Eighty-six (86)
Responses Received within 200': One (1) — see attached
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-047 Page 3
Notification Response Form
ZAI "7
Meeting Late: June 9, 2016 at 6:30 PM
GRIFFIN, GILBERT
703 EDWARD CT
SCUTHLAKE, TX 76092
Direct quesbans and mail responses to:
City of Southlaku
Planning & Development Services
Notification Response
1400 Main St: Ste 310
Make, TX 76092
Phone: (817)748-8621
Fax: (617)749-8077
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owners) of the property so rooted above- are hereby
in favor ofci�tcundecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Site Plan referenced above_
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature, Date,
T
r
Addition igen re: Yii,��rr� „��r�,�� _ Date.-
Printed
ate.Rrinted Name(s),'
Must he pra . aimerlsj wh , nam"sj ofu pn nt£dd Lop 01hervaise cnrvlad 1he Planning aeparlment. One farm Pw F'Toperty.
Phone Number (optional)
Case No.
ZA16-047
Attachment D
Page 4