Loading...
Item 6B13 CITY OF S0UTHLA1<.,,E Department of Planning & Development Services CASE NO: PROJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: STAFF REPORT July 25, 2016 ZA16-045 Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court On behalf of Landlock LLC, c/o Warren Clark Development, Four Peaks Development, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court from "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District with base SF -20A Zoning on approximately 5.8 acres on property described as portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, generally located south of Zena Rucker Road approximately 1,000 feet east of Byron Nelson Parkway and addressed as 851 and 841 E Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #9. DETAILS: Four Peaks Development, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court from the current "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District for the development of approximately 5.8 acres consisting of eight (8) residential lots and four (4) open space lots, to be served by a gated private street. The following table is the Matthews Court site data summary information and development regulations as proposed: Avg. Lot Size +/-22,197 +/-21,660 N/A No. of Open Space Lots 2 4 N/A No. of Private Street Lots N/A 1 N/A Gross Acreage 5.8 Acres 5.8 Acres N/A Density apen Space Acreage (%] Minimum Lot Size Maximum Height Front Yard Setback Side Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Maximum Lot Coverage Case No. ZA16-045 1.5 DU/Net Acre 0.62 Acre (10.68°1 20,000 sq. ft. 2 '/2 stories/ 35 ft. Not less than 25 ft., with an additional reduction of up to 25% (6.5 ft.) for tree preservation Not less than 10 ft. Not less than 30 ft., provided that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac not less than 25 ft. 40% 1.5 DU/Net Acre 0.60 Acre (10.360I 20,000 sq. ft. 2 '/z stories / 35 ft. Not less than 25 ft., with an additional reduction of up to 25% (6.5 ft.) for tree preservation Not less than 10 ft. Not less than 30 ft., provided that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac not less than 25 ft. 40% 2.18 DU/Net Acre N/A 20,000 sq. ft. 2 '/z stories / 35 ft. Not less than 35ft Not less than 15 ft. Not less than 40 ft., provided that lots fronting on a cul-de- sac, not less than 35 ft. 30% The applicant is proposing to construct Zena Rucker Road per the requirements of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. The road has been aligned such that it can be constructed on the subject property. The City will be installing a box culvert at the creek to the west of the property to allow Zena Rucker Road to be extended east. The applicant has agreed to install a bridge to the west of the proposed Matthews Court neighborhood. Future R.O.W. dedication of the Hayes' property to the north may be required at the time of development of their property to ensure adequate parkway for a sidewalk and utilities along the north side of Zena Rucker Road. Dedication is estimated to be less than 200 square feet. A Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court was previously approved by City Council on October 6, 2015 (ZA15-070). The purpose of the proposed revision to the approved plan is to modify the current "R -PUD" zoning and development plan to allow for Matthews Court to be a gated private street. This Zoning Change and Development Plan is related to and being processed concurrently with a Preliminary Plat application under Planning Case No. ZA16-046. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider 2nd Reading Approval of Zoning Change and Development Plan Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) SPIN Meeting Report (E) Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 3, 2016 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map (G) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (H) Ordinance No. 480-701 a (1) Full Size Plans (for the City Council Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Jerod Potts (817) 748-8195 Case No. ZA16-045 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Landlock LLC, c/o Warren Clark Development APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, LLC PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located south of Zena Rucker Road approximately 1,000 feet east of Byron Nelson Parkway and addressed as 851 and 841 E Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District REQUESTED ZONING: "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: October 6, 2015 — City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court (ZA15-070, Ord. No. 480-701) October 6, 2015 — City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for Matthews Court (ZA15-071) CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for the original project (ZA15-070) on June 23, 2015 at Southlake Town Hall. A SPIN Town Hall Forum has not been held for the revised project (ZA16-045). A SPIN Meeting Report from the June 23, 2015 SPIN Town Hall Forum is included as Attachment "D" of this report. SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Medium Density Residential. As proposed, this development is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan. The image to the right illustrates the Future Land Use for the proposed location. Future Land Use Matthews Court Case No. ZA16-045 awx w�ne:w Land We D—ignmiion: Medium Density Re.sidennal °uture Land Use 190 -Year Fleed Mam _ Carps of E ng ineefs Props rty _ Public PaMiOpen Space Publief5cmi-Public Low Density R—dentlal Medium Deneiry Residential PISrcc Comm inial - Retail C—.neial - Miaed use _ T—Center Regional Relail Industnal 1 —'moo IfS - Attachment A Page 1 Master Thoroughfare Plan Zena Rucker Road currently does not connect between Byron Nelson Parkway and Carroll Avenue. Access to this proposed subdivision is contingent upon the construction of Zena Rucker Road, which according to the Southlake Master Thoroughfare Plan is designated as a 2 -lane collector (C2U) with a minimum 60' R.O.W. required. A minimum radius of 400' and minimum tangent length of 50' between curves is required per Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. This development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of offsite R.O.W. and construction of a portion of Zena Rucker Road. Note, the applicant is not proposing to finish the connection of Zena Rucker Road between Byron Nelson Parkway and Carroll Avenue; the street is proposed to be extended from its terminus near the west boundary of this site to the east boundary leaving approximately 600' to the nearest cross street and terminus to the east. Mobilitv Master Plan The Mobility Master Plan recommends the extension of Zena Rucker Road east to S. Carroll Avenue. Below is the recommendation as written within the Mobility Master Plan. The proposal for Matthews Court states that in conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S. Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway. R= Recommendations I �. = M �� WE= As Rucker Extend Rucker Assist in Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW and Prade Road east to S bridging the Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, properties Carroll Ave. floodplain to Cl, C2 Options 3.5, develop, Roadways are enable the 3.9 traffic anticipated to be completion of MT volumes constructed as the Rucker 12 are development extension expected to occurs with city project. increase participation in along FM bridging the 1709. floodplain. Pathways / Sidewalk Plan The Official Pathways Map, adopted by City Council on January 7, 2014 designates that the north side of Zena Rucker Road is designated as having a future sidewalk that is less than 8 feet wide and the south side of Zena Rucker Road is designated as having a future multiuse trail that is greater than or equal to 8 feet wide. The pedestrian access plan for Matthews Court shows a continuation of the existing 8 foot wide hike & bike trail on the south side of future Zena Rucker Road, which was designed to connect with the future trail to the east and the west. Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan The Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan was approved by City Council on September 20, 2011. The following recommendations are relevant to the medium density Case No. Attachment A ZA16-045 Page 2 cluster residential area designated on the Illustrative Recommendations Map (below chart). Ref. Issue Recommendation No. 1. Land use designation Medium Retain the Medium Density Residential Density Residential designation for the area south of Zena Rucker Road 2. Considerable amount of area LU3 dedicated to floodplain and other Encourage "cluster" residential water features development 1. Environmental stewardship and innovation in green building 2. Reserved open space/landscape areas require heavy irrigation E2 3. On-site drainage detention facilities 1. Desire to decrease dependence on the automobile for everyday needs M1 2. Two schools, shopping and offices all within close proximity of the site 1. Create a vibrant and appealing M3 streetscape along the area's local streets 1. A landscaped parkway concept with minimal pavement is desired for Zena Rucker Road 2. Landscaped medians preferred Preserve heavily wooded areas, especially within drainage areas and floodplain Encourage water reuse for irrigation Encourage green building design practices Preserve and enhance existing ponds Reflect the desired preservation on the Carroll/1709 Small Area Illustrative Map on the Environmental Resource Protection map Development should be pedestrian oriented, emphasizing pedestrian connectivity in any residential areas. Provide passive trails through preserved natural areas which also provide connectivity to the sidewalk system Provide curvilinear streets Provide street trees between the sidewalk and the street curb Consider the creation of a new 60' ROW 2- lane divided collector (C2D) with medians and left-turn/stacking lanes at intersections in the Mobility Plan to apply to Zena Rucker Road M4 3. No on -street, parallel parking is "Urban" cross section which includes desired curb, gutters, medians, street trees and sidewalks. Speed limit not to exceed 30 m.p.h. Design as a local slow movement roadway. 1. Appropriately buffer and screen Recommend a parkway buffer and U2 residential south of Zena Rucker Road street trees adjacent to Rucker Road. from any non-residential uses to the north side of Zena Rucker Road Case No. Attachment A ZA16-045 Page 3 Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan Illustrative Recommendations Map. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions Portions of Zena Rucker Road have been constructed from Byron Nelson Parkway and from S. Carroll Avenue. The proposal for Matthews Court states that in conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S. Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway. Traffic Impact Single -Family Detached 8 76 2 4 5 Housing (210) • Vehicle Trips Per Day • AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday • Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7t" Edition UTILITIES: Water The applicant is proposing a connection to an existing eight inch (8") water line running north of the existing portion of Zena Rucker Road. The Preliminary Water & Sanitary Sewer Layout for Matthews Court shows that the proposed eight inch (8") water line and valve will stub out with at nearly the same place as the end of the proposed extension of Zena Rucker Road (at the end of the Matthews Court Subdivision). The applicant is proposing an 8 inch (8") water line and valve to run along the east side of proposed Matthews Court road in order to service the subdivision. Case No. Attachment A ZA16-045 Page 4 Sewer The applicant will be extending 8 inch (8") sewer from a sewer manhole located between Rockenbaugh Elementary and Lot 4, Block 1 Pecan Creek. The applicant is proposing an 8 inch (8") sanitary sewer main to run along the west side of proposed Matthews Court road in orderto service the subdivision. The Preliminary Water & Sanitary Sewer Layout for Matthews Court shows sanitary sewer being extended to the northeast corner of the Matthews Court subdivision south of Zena Rucker Road. TREE PRESERVATION: There is approximately 39.8% tree canopy coverage, and the applicant is proposing to preserve as much as 53.7% of that tree cover. There is approximately 8.4% of that cover that is marginal and could potentially be removed. The proposed Tree Conservation Plan is attached. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: June 9, 2016; Approved (3-1) subject to the Staff Report dated June 3, 2016 and subject to the Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 3, 2016 CITY COUNCIL: June 21, 2016; Approved (4-3) subject to the Staff Report dated June 14, 2016 and the Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 3, 2016 noting that the approval of the Development Plan is as presented and shown on Attachment "C" Page 1 of the Staff Report which indicates a gated private street and noting the applicant is accepting the development regulations as provided in Attachment "C" Page 10 of the Staff Report, granting staff administrative discretion on reconfiguring the direction of the sidewalk on the east side of the property based upon future development STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 3, 2016 N:ICommunity DevelopmentlMEMO12016 Cases1045 - ZDP - Matthews CourtlStaff ReportlZA16-045 -CC - 2016-8-2.doc Case No. ZA16-045 Attachment A Page 5 Vicinity Map Matthews Court 800 62D 830 I � 650 18.0 } 70fl_j I_ I K: EAST SOUTHLAKE BLVD 751 801 887 125 525._ gag 711 1 641 721 771 601 631 803 j 611 621 jc 865 900 1 910 191 "050 1- i 811 821 -� 1035 ata X35 ws Z A RUGKE-R RD� R I N j{ M I' 225 229 301) 305 YVC1 iJv'�1�LSa 224 228 300 304 308 In �iooIOW i1008 1012 101E 90] 1®24, CV T� 0 y1006� 1013 1017 v 1000106Yf001 a 401 - LM 11DD 1001 1005 1009 1013 - _ 1101 os N 1000 1004 9p _ G N PL 1001 1005k 1 Case No. ZA16-045 ZA'16-045 & ZA'16-046 Zoning Change and Development Plan S & Preliminary Plat 0 200 400 800 1,200 Feet Attachment B Page 1 Plans and Support Information Proposed Development Plan BETAL W (1'-20') LETAIL "8" (1•'-20') Irrrun AIJGIAVENT R,,f ER OF H :. RIONT CF -WAY 1 O AS PRENOUSLY WA E E HA T I x 4fiPRDVE2ONLNL' E e+T CASE TAI5OLIOTHTQ NEAO ALL _ I IORINNANCE 4801 701j - E 0 LE D} EMENT a= FOR MATD{EW5 OGURT ulijMFT MA. Ati CT S TE LI, Tit NtE PECESTPoAN AtCE55 EASEu€NT 11 I ,` Jp MANHOLE EANRARY SEw£R I l II WkVHOLM r ATER VALVE T - -, ;Fa� I Er"+R'+EVTuL �L•�I LOCATION MAP (N.T.S.). a- -TE I pATpl E%ISTINC - - _T_ - AYING CA055- -�_ T T c la SIM = - rr i I LEIA � <gg T ccs s�Nres— .xar,u 31 T:: i 117.95' 196.58 i 'WE T"E In aow.]y, fT i 1 N8734140.1e NB-, ----• PO c:e ZENA RUCKER ROAD MQ€: EN_110N - /�% errNEAN ncm w.> 4— 1. E L, _ _ R • 1 EIE i% EE E u I LT s• 1 I u ELL Ra: 1 o . f J L 1, L T - - ri`r IL.i. i L Tr L ,i LLE - =L - E E -LT -E E it -L S88"4B'01"W 405-01' :.. _ -amu A TRIS I � C ixANInN lArt+ BR aIOL ]Ese' p� f[x txC { DEVELOPMENTPLAN ... _ FOR ZA76—C45045 ZONING REQUEST reEolu. owe ai ms MATNEWS COURT LOTS 1-B AMC 9X-IOX, BLOCK A; SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART LOTS IN -3X, BLOCK B 3 PROPOSED DEN:L.IC T .'HE'!.. LE 6 RESIDENTIAL LOTS L ='TII -T€' T -TE TH - TE '' 4 OPEN SPACE LOTS R PRIVATE STREET L07 PF I = - t Z. Ai1Pye JiZN,-TAA4� LF •I F T ...E I 'E IT, E I E' N=L Ad10 BFINu ffa05 —N 0NT of 1NF CI F = - - F OM NNx;HT SURVEY. AB5YRACT NUMBBR 555 L NET - F- - F dTT OF SW11LN(E. TARRANI LgINTT, TEXAS A E - - Fi FOUR PEAKS DEVELOPMENT. LlG APPLICANT Nu, L:EE _ L - f EeNi SouLNI Ixraq 9d9W 120-5]3 (21AmT5-343/ MINIMWM LOT SIZE �— - �Te'-F Tun Nne�Nxx F AVERAGE LOT S1 -E IF RFSIDENTIAI, OFN'IT' L T C' - } `4 LANOLOCK. LLC 4YMER R MAX MPERNOUS F - f I T '" 2 ; 6380 Addlooa Road (ST2N31-BBTt T Ccntoct: Otlx LIeIR"k mom. J% PARTNERS, INC. AUTHORIZED AGENT I level Nuorun Ams, sunN zm 5 (eT21s.. TE. EXISRNG OVERHE A' IIL11E HILL TE L +TET AND AUL _ I ( I � Atlicen. 1... 78001 NEW FRANCHISE JRLITE' '41LL RE 'L r €--iJMD I } � Can18c1 Amy SA. AN CRd1AND EO�I'MENT YRCE`E I' - - C W61M 7F� ra. F �•. m -. .�OxO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NO. AE3 'E -I - "" " "` ""� "'" Nd^• wu,,,IWEe Ma.6(.ims'IE Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 1 Proposed Development Plan / Open Space Plan - Close -Up - Proposed Gated Private Street on Matthews Court DOC. ND1512047 . D2 _ p ,e 8 -- itV7'34 140.18' - N87'31'24"€ 147.96' - 7F - 618 �1 -�y�.a ► -,;vim - ---- (vARiABt€- WIDTH �.;o-.w.) - - t�wc� — �1 4.03 I ` 1188.02'23"E L4 'J 0.00' I 14 � PUBLIC w C16 F' STREETRIVA f/fj fOT OX, \� A.E. AND (s ' STREETE v 2 / f BL CA A L 'DSCAPE ESMT. f / VA IABLE WIDTH y !//OPEN SPACE `SEE NOTE 11 2t 105 sq%ylft. �`� ",.- f N n 1 0.324 a0 e$ —`." 1`_� RJ r U OPEN SPACE' 25 , PA k tiU 5.0' iSEE PLAN FOR LAYOUT) ` 11 �l j 'ice A N88'48'01"E 160104 \ 10' U.E., P.A. C 00 d and Landseap �10' SIDE YARD SETBgCK a' j Easement lj �CV d LOT 1, f PAM BLOCK A 20,029 sq.ft. & r gyp' °' C a�° �em "G I o 0.460 acres r >"C) _---.�- 1,6.58' ,, PA STABLES P.A.E.IAND LANDS APE ESMT. VARIABLE WIDTH SEE NO1qE 11 L BL CK A 11O�E SPACE a co 111,1 2 sq.ft. f/ ,.41,0.257 acres (SEE OPEN SPACE WEAN FOR LAYOUT� i TS88'48'01"W 154.09' I � f RV 10' SIDE YARDS ETB,CK T.P.&L. EASEM T� CENTERLINE 0 EXISTING` ,p OVERHEAD P ERLINE'a AND POWER -OLES r f VOL. 24880 PG© 36 Of E-5 Entr Gate scde: 1/4' = V FUTURE ZFNA RUCKER ROAD Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 2 Previously Approved Development Plan (October 6, 2015) LEGEND s� WATE9 E—NENT EASEMENT � - NEADNAIL GRa, EASEMENT SITE p E 5 B aa:%T 6�I--+Iwr. l4 I NauNmE SANrrANr S_aT gad $ III j Wl A stflu n �� � � � r WATER VALVE [� ur xy w¢ orriIX E6MxFApki sg6r(i `' ? i� s tel! E CONT PEN TA. KW q5 LOCATION MAP (N. T.S.) M" PA89TA1 PANTO M APPRD%TO BYRp1' t 0.383 P'moo ! ft 2 sq,fr. Bzd® vuG, M�lIS�CCA. ERNra � x IvrvrY �; � � uLa 3n4 f ? ! ¢,e 2 ] �I r�tmx.Tc i 6 to LOT 1. vrwrt JE f ' ` r'' oA,m ULr Iw,uo Bs .. w 2 & t TA % •__-__ __'_ � Y--1 ___ - _` •_-�rW SP. 5Et8 � w' i � r � I wtw-"�`eR c �„\ wTra:. dvoy w I Q \ LOT 'A 0 ao�e9' /I m%NistMUNM, —IT wo 1�6 , J•1 T 3. ® 2� y I it uc. Nmuye vvovm Irt.Amu L2t SI �_ n z 1z1 ,�.. I ,x _h g tilr'$�'J I• sme �I i i ., aizG I cssn vNc 0A nLRffs) L. MEWAt BMI4IY _NNNNIAL 4Z �L tf 11 rltTT � ~� if 13 23,2] sA It kpv.A ,� I� �� 4 gl �`'•wALLID iRACT2-LN4 AgE01 L \ i 6B Aft �.. BOE. 3Y0. Be15M1B3Y I+ !r 1 I _P" I'A Q.saa .� � � .'soxrA[... � i xEBNN`BpxMr:`4ewBxsx i r L 'Ilk + V �L T,ua,T,6A« s C — m �L rMIO •.- — — ) L —�— --- — f SBSA4�M01 I { rtr f)J--- u��v�l 616 N N , / f I zee I�w>,ucl+ mwrn'+ a QBE .taw •'".� Twp i N �YNIIn9�BwA LSA � I u0umuu�v� a�ND,T+L SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART DE4ELOPAKNT PLAN PROPOSED VART FOR ZA1�070 ZONING REQUEST 7 ANTIOTFD START BATE: 4TH TH OUAR7F1i 2015 Dww TALE IN M. DELTA RAP61S LENGTH TANGENT CHCRP SEARING C ORD MATTIIEWS CWRT EXISTINGPCS ZONING: AS PROPOSED ZONING: R -PUB CI 5TI8'2] ra t s— 5.906 AGES OIIT R' INE LAND USE DESGlNARON: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL C2 Pt'4 Q1N NMISN7 SLUT E . ABSTRACT N6 629 PROPOSED LANG USE DESIGNATION: C] 38v}'y9' t5h.Mh' iB2xB' 6122 Nt T3C3t"E I b0, 32' "' CF 6GlRiLA1iE TI "` CCUNM. Td AS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL C4 1" 4'A]` t tl 7' 1 'T W I ], FOUR PEAKS f7iVELOPMENT\ LLC APPLICANT GROSS ACREAGE: 5.6 ACI (252,901 Sr) GS 23Y6't h' 151AOh' fl0.92 3D.B9' NT25h'M'W Bh.5h' lu=ng ]u11� la0-S9] NET ACREAGE: 5.3 ACi (230.393 SF) CII t] 4. 4' t4T I 1 4 G Ihk Lq Tum l 2 (� AREA OF OPEN SPACE 27.026 SFt C] 15° 2r' 4360E 1t 3.B3' Si.15' SA4'2S2A"E 113.3O' CmNxL Tan MaLlF,aa OPEN S PACE A5 A PERCENTAGE: TO 66% NUMBER of PROPOSED LOTS B LOTSI UNE TABLE LANOLOCK. LLC AI MININUU LOT SIZE: 20,000 SF UNE EEARINO DISTANCE 1B511h Aa _ -1 CVIDG T -p RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: 1.5 LCTS/NET AC L1 `T 619' f AW%M TMW T6G0T MAX IMPERNOU5 OBVERADE PER LOTS 40% Cw ' Dose D"* 5>BYR't h'E L3 1 .91 PARTNERS, INC ABfTNORIZED AGENT L} 1 5dB573i'E 21 M �5A01 OMN.A. E{A B (9 p46 -M]6 I LS 1 sa•sT3]°E I iBA' �nlryo°°I EASTTNC OVERHEAD UTILITIES MLL BE RELOCATO AND ALL NEW L. sN'1t'S9'E 3980' s ro I.z19xc FRAHMSE UTILITIES NIC. BE PLACED UNDERGRDJNO ANO LT 1 I' ' 4LT a4 mI6 v GROUND EQUIPMENT SCREENED IN ACGORDANC€ MTH SUBDIMSION L8 N431t2'G3'E _t �t uLv-o44oI6 wtDINAN31 NO, 453 S-CTIQN —S, aln sM Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 3 Proposed Tree Conservation Plan TREE SIZES TREES TREES LESS THAN 10" 0 EXISTING PRESERVED TREES TREES 10" - 19" 0 POSSIBLE PRESERVED TREES 0 EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED 0 TREES 20"- 29" WU EAMMY COARA" TOTAL SF1S A 2SI901 SF 0.4 ACq-1 TOTAL MMM GN 1W377SF Q 3 A ./.1 J! -Y 0TREES 30" AND GREATER I MMAD TME CAVO" IM AK D TRF[ CANOPY IGQENI ,SSSS 5F0.01 0-1 63.416 R'1SMW MUSTRYW TAA6 CANDPP 0010" "s 5F 40.2 K�II11.1 t/6 54D52 SF 11.T AC $1 .^ Case No. ZA16-045 MATTHEWS COURT PLANTED IN COMMON AREA BEI CALIPER INCHES 1OT y ' � ` � •S YSl vvip 2'BKF W, TYRICAL 91NLDEk REOUiREO TREE FAN SHADE TREE (34 cADvSn 1N WaA10) U110Eit6TORY TREE Q RE0u6LD) ZA16-04S TREE CONSERVATION PLAN SOUTHLAKL, TEXAS Attachment C Page 4 IN Case No. ZA16-045 MATTHEWS COURT PLANTED IN COMMON AREA BEI CALIPER INCHES 1OT y ' � ` � •S YSl vvip 2'BKF W, TYRICAL 91NLDEk REOUiREO TREE FAN SHADE TREE (34 cADvSn 1N WaA10) U110Eit6TORY TREE Q RE0u6LD) ZA16-04S TREE CONSERVATION PLAN SOUTHLAKL, TEXAS Attachment C Page 4 7ABY GAYIfl93 11d1es OPECIFB 1572 7.5 HpcFhamy 1576 IQ H.dm.rry 1506 7 HerYberry 1501 115 Cluebr H.rlhemy 1584 5.5 Harlbe 1585 a Spm Gum 6amalie 1558 a S,Id 1n9w. 1589 135 Cluabr. Cada Ekm 1591 7 Calor Ek. 1592 5 YM - 1W3 7 AmWpn�m 1595 16 AnuC.d Qm_ 1593 8 Cede I 1811 8 Oek I 1817 5.5 Osk I 1813 5.5 �r 1811 12 Gum aumak. 62 11 105 Am.0-Qm 1522 12 Oak 1623 9 Spm Gum Rumelw I 1624 8.5 H.Ob n I 1525 13 DO I 16286 Elm Nukbarry I 1827 a" Cd., Elm %2aBS CIu.br Cede 1629 5 AMmedrAn Elm I 1639 7.5 Amwk.. Sm I 1631 24 501 Oak I 1632 a A-11.1 B. ,638 a oak 1137 7 Amer) k Elrlr ,eft 27 O.k 1642 7 DO 1 154a12 Ceder Etm I 1049 0 Cad.r Elm I 1650 09 SWM Cads Elm I 1065 10b I Cadu EMn Ekn Case No. ZA16-045 Tree List TAB# [IMMETC! b.1m SpEciea 1692 B _ Cadt&E 1693 8 Cedar EM 764 16 Haelba 1710 1 Amo- Om 1711 6 Hercubs Cluh 1712H 8 y 1713 0- ., El Ceddar Elm 1731 6 Hercule Club 1 1732 12 Hack " 1 1743 6 Cuter 1 1744 65 1. 1 1745 1 Oek 1746 7 Spm Gal, 1747 a 5 sp19 C." I Ina_ I 7 CedW 179 7 Oak 1756 9 Gek 1i61 7.5 Mnedun Elm 1752 91 Qm 17539 9Sol I Amedw. PJm 1 1754 8 Calm 1753 7.5 Elm 1 175a 7 0.k 1757 I 6.5 O.k 1771 I 65 Cedm 1772 1 130"IN H.ckberry 17776 Spm Gum Rum.1rA I 1774 12 Koft v 1771 12 S Cels .:1111771 I 1834 8.55 Y HackO. 1777 1 200-1. Haddrerry no a CI -1w N. -i. Club 1779 1 .0 w Nackbegy 1706 1 6 Herhberry 1781 I 6 Spm H.cAberry 17132 7 spm Hedberry 1783 I 75SOM Hed�herry 1784 I 6 Hackb.m 17"9 1 7 I Ha .rry 17Be T H.ckblIn 1787 9 5 SW4 H.dib." 1788 65 Oak 1790 65 Oak 17916 _ Oak 1793 .5 Ca 11ds Hadrh.. 1794 1 __ Hudm.ny 1 TAG. DIAD IGI N Y t 1786 IJ Hadmamy 1797 5 o k 1799 6 Ha M." 1799- 6.5 H-Jberry 1800 6 Heck y 1a01 8 Hsckbe. 1102 0- Hxkherry 180412 Btlu.br Hsd"M 1 lar H"VAOY 1800 145 Yt Web A.h 1807 :5 H.ciherry lava 6.55p1tt I Haulat taoY 9 Oak 1 18181 8Ckb751m 1 Hacltlrerry I I 1811 I I Hx4Gtrry I 1 1012 1 30.5 SPM I Oak 1 1813 8.5 'll Haddla 1014 .ebr Ha kbur7 1515 7 CeMr tela 9Sol I H.lft 1517 a 1 Hecib-y 1 1515 1 6 I H1011 -y 1 1 1924 1 e 1 00k 1 I 1825 I 15 Ck ter I Alva- B. I 020 'Eli5 q.k 1e36 39 tlu91m Amenc4m Qm 1 11 A -E Elm 1032 8.5 Qm 1 1533 I 11.5 1 Qm 1 I 1834 I 6 5 I Pease I I 1835 I 105 Cketm I H.dLemy I I 1&38 I /Ow 1 H.*b.M 1 1857 1 65 Cad., 10311 I C..4.r 1839 II Oak 15+19 11 Mk 1860 29 Hecltbamy I 1551 I a I Qm I I 1852 1 7 I Elm I I 1553 1 1 I CW.r I 1&131 BCMets CaduElm 1e65 Cedar lam 6SPI4. Ame,um Qm 1557 7 American Qm I 1155 7 5 I Had "y I taee I 12.55Wd I H.411iem I I Ian I 14 Cels I Hacldlarry 1 seal I 65 I H. Xb-y I 1882 6.5Ckets Who." 1872 1 Hemalek Gub 1072 9.55p1ir Amenum Om 1874 7 Spl4 Amenc.n Qm I 1879 10 I Cater I Amncen El'. I 1BTG 105pm I A,.,: 8'. 1 I len I 12 Mets I Amancan Qm 1 1078 I 7 I Hackbeny I 1879 6 HadOe 1160 e5pa N.ckherry 1501 10 H.cimerry I las' 16 I HaCAberry 1 1883 I 96pd I Hackeemy I 1 1154 I 6 I HaGkberry I 1 1855 1 11 1 Hauk.am 1 1 1656 1 16.5 I Wd1Mmy 1 1 1:07 1 25 ( Oak TREE$ IN R.O.W. TO -_ REMOVED I TAG 13HWE16t{1nej SP6EE 1 1570 10 H.Cb4rtk' 1 1 s72 5 HaclsurY I 1575 20 Cke WNOM 1577 _ 6.5 Cd. 0i 1578 12 GWar 15?4 a SWI, H.pArerr7 I 15$2 913,111 Haelba" I I 1583 Btlu.br H.*b." I I 1509 9Clow H..M- I 1594 16309 Amenran Elm 1598 20.5 Ctuaw A. -lam 1602 a Sp,11 P- 1603 125pktAm.Man El 1604 05 Am ,Qm 18057 H-M-ly 1768 1256W0 Fkn 1758 9 Cedar 1750 7.5spit Cd.E" 1781 6Gusbr CederElm 1 1753 a CW.r I 1784 11 Clout Ary ul 91 1786 CWn 1706 9 Cuter 'M7 8 M Cedar 175a 7 GWar 1 1769 6.13 Hadbely I 1770 17.5 Cb.W 1789 Oak 1782 Cuter E.n lelg ispx H.dm:ay 1820 6 Hetl&.my 1921 10 RIM 1022 a Oak 1829 14 a-19-04 1827 14 ChAW HWO-y la2a 12 Cluster Hadm- I 1929 65 Pecan I 1841 ?spa Cesar Et. 1542 9 cbk 1943 d Hil 1844 5 Gua1m F1. 1845 9 5 Glalar Fbcld+akrY I 1898 8 HaclmemY I 1 7847 a55Pit HecHM%k 1 1 1846 7 Hackbemy I 1849 8 CI -W H.tkbem r 1863 a Spa Necknerry 1691 9 Clu.mr Hndd.eNy 885 5 5 1 1894 7 'WO -y I 1 lea? 6.5 1,11.d4Hmy 1 1469 5 H.dma tBOA 7 t 079 6.5 H.db..y t 871 11 HadOM TREE LIST FOR ZA16-045 ZONING REQUEST MATTHEWS COURT LOTS 1-8 ANO SX -10X. BLOCK A; LOTS IX -3X, BLOCK B 8RESIDENTIAL LOTS 4 OPEN SPACE LOTS 1 PRIVATE STREET LOT AND BE[NG 5.806 ACRES OUT OF THE O.W. KUR NIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT kUMeER a99 CIM OF SCUTFEAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TFKAS FOUR PEAKS DEYELOPYENT. LLC APPLICANT 2600 E..1 S.uthl.ke Bain -d, 5u'de 120-323 {214)676-3434 Swthldr.. T--78082 Cont«1: rum H.Nhe.. LANDLOCK, LLC OWNER 16390 A Road (472)931-8971 Addlacn,Taxa. 75001 C.Mact: 0.1. Cl.rk ,181 PARTNERS, INC. AUTHORIZED AGENT 10301 Cusum Dri- Surto 200 R (972)248-7676 Addl- T.- 75001 eomt«t: Berry Spa 1777E Nom- I ♦Sa FyIYS M1'.o. ]n,rmCC I0--- soy 2; 2®1s S ..a -, 2, 2818 Attachment C Page 5 Previously Approved Tree Conservation Plan (October 6, 2015) TREE SIZES TREES j TREES LESS THAN 10" f i EXISTING PRESERVED TREES TREES 10- - 19" (_ .: POSSIBLE PRESERVED TREES ZA15 070 EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED I r4tf'SD'YFY `tT.-n'r TREES 20" - 29" �I TREE AMMY COVERAGE iG_N �i4E IIR1�./.H.lCI lOF xCf H Ii.Y K+f ;�,6 TREES 3-0' AND GREATER MESWWTRELCAN[ l PR�ESFaViJ IFF'AMCH'li. P.? sS.JfI SF Ii.OKI�i <3.E4 / ru_;IFA"R WILD rBFE CRu:yr i+4L.Wn E.H9 it I7.J 4iN-'s S.H. M,>Y4 xl I+.t 4Lu-I Yl.9s TREE CONSERVATION FLAN 21r.AI R.II. IFR W QUIRFT. TRr7 RLR SN W! M!E ;4A fsei�9 ,1_iG %'uWEi; AREA t_v_E23TC:'Y'T:CC +a Kqu""n5 uNCMON ZA15 070 I r4tf'SD'YFY `tT.-n'r SOUTHLAKE.TEXAS II III xl 21r.AI R.II. IFR W QUIRFT. TRr7 RLR SN W! M!E ;4A fsei�9 ,1_iG %'uWEi; t_v_E23TC:'Y'T:CC +a Kqu""n5 ZA15 070 MATTHEWS COURT SOUTHLAKE.TEXAS II III Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 6 Proposed Open Space Plan G Close -Up View f Vier Frpm My}&hews CaurY Sedr "1112t- I' a ewes r,. -fro OPEN CE PLM idt 2A)& -M5 YBNNF f9sltii �Ve� ��' r YaT1fKMi MA.T • Q w r nem --PSI v- LOTS I -e NW iX-Kil LOGIC A: hEXkr�lilJ�J. [� ,�R y-,-,�I `iC Y �e..w i� IOTg 1Y�SK MILOGM B a A[8on,nu WK u � •e.rr ww.-.ori ra 10PEN SPKi lA15 1 PANAR STREET lOT Q 7o>v011f4 ,YNY1! canm, Rias FOUR PFAMS OE1F1tlrR'Nl. LLC Af44CNf1 mli enwri m. ,>i.em m 4 uueo Rm. w,uiw In.b)e-]W 4/1ClLra. ILC DOLP e.ne•e sr. Iw. 8 PYl11F1S. MK A1111RR�A • iuo R AS]IT (a)pTw'nw 10! Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 7 hEXkr�lilJ�J. _ - - � En lry Gnle WEN WACE FI.NI KA ZAIG-M zcmN REt11EV I >� -••a�-I - R eLIXM e - � e � er 1.. . . h REhp>Ea1naL Ltlffi �'� Tc smEEr wT .- ... .a. rwls In.1ne-w. IwlExno,. lire OWE,x .. ,e, PAnnms xG. �ue+Gmrrn Amrt e..m•s w..r sp. Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 7 Previously Approved Open Space Plan (October 6, 2015) 3j I � � f 6+ ,o � •o.�r, n.. s.. ua s.,..D1 e mwx faw.�a..,a1 w w. R rEView From Rucker Road �J N.T.S. ® 0 F31 p q, >. Pw mo un m. (4umcv.-nr�luU - a�tw.a y -62 6 M1 P OPEN SPACE PLAN FOR ZAIS-070 ZONING REQUEST , MATTHEWS COURT npe ACRES arc q' iNE na IHa1r slxMr, 6�la6cr xa ® � qlY OF 9CNTfl,46. TNRpiT gxH1Y. 1ESA4 Y FOUR PEAKS DEVELOP M% LLC A UCANT 3 kn4 Sw 6 .'I' 0. pvN ,Hili (M4)67- M N4)67 -]134M PARTNERS. INC. AVTNONIM AGENT IW6 Awn iaw6019N. m6x trz)246-T rerc n� � g� ua �w,eoco 6 uv s�q n�i6 Close -Up View i - FUTURE ZFNA RUCKER ROAD 44 r ENcciq Tr 4 vYec ,,^]poen N.M. C�, ..y1+J corva¢ . T w A 'r 8 um ti Ftp r+ L 8 �ly. (.... ` ' xawnudo 1 E �t T_ C �''1 xCmWa mi �L;` eamumBLOf,KPACE A LacoomFk (;; e. LOT X. OPEN S m } �' 4 BLOCK Ap OFEh SP 4CE a.rmud6 I f r Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 8 Case No. ZAl 6-045 FUTURE ZENA RUCKER ROAD 1 -10 L LOT I f LOT 8 20.029 SQ FT 20,990 SQ FT LOT 2 21,561 SQ FT LOT 3 22,121 SQ LOT 4 23.277 SO FT ZV Attachment C Page 9 Proposed Development Standards '1ir►=N%'5 Coi'RT DENTI OPMENU STANDARDS Development shall tape place in accordance with Section 14 (SF -20A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) of the Southlake Zoning Ordinance. as amended unless as otherwise identified below. 1. Matthews Court shall be demloped in general accordwce with the Concept Plan - 2. Private Streets. -Restricted Access: Private streets and restricted access shall be allowed within the Matthews Court neighborhood. Unless othemise identified in these development standards and. -or on the attached exhibits. SouBilake's Private Street and Restricted Access standards shall apply. 3. Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than 25', with an additional reduction of up to 25% (6.5) for tree presetvatiotr Said determination shall take place at the time of building permit submittal for the individual home and shall be agreed upon by the City as part of the building pent approval process. 4. Side Yard: There shall be aside yard of not less than 10'. 5. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than 30'. provided that on lots fronting on a cul-de- sac. there shall be a rear yard of not less than 25'. 6. Mw6mu n Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maxti um lot coverage not exceeding 40° o of the lot area. except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet. 7. Neighborhood Screening: Screening of the neighborhood from Zena Rucker Road shall be accomplished with a combination of masonry wall and landscaping as shown on the Open Space Plan and Neighborhood Screening Exhibit. Six foot (6') tall_ oven style metal fencing shall be Provided along the western limits of the neighborhood.1 Said fencing will not however. be allowed within a dedicated drainage easem mt.1 Eight foot (8') tall board -on -board cedar ferning vnth a cap nig across the top of the boards shall be provided along the southern and eastern limits of the neighborhood. Metal poles shall be used with the cedar- fencing. Additionally, any fence cross members shall be placed on the inside of the neighborhood. This perimeter fencing shall be stained a uniform color and shall be of a similar appearance as that which %%ms built for the nearby 'Finding Creek neighborhood. With the exception of the screening along Zena Rucker Road. which will be built in conjunction with the development of the neighborhood. the above referenced screening will be built in conjunction with the home construction on the affected lot. N krrEE s CoL &T F -- 11 MA.Y 31, 2016 Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 10 S. Fencing: Fencing prodded for indiiidual lots and not addressed as part of the neighborhood screemag shall be provided as follows. Eight foot (8') tall board -on -board cedar fencing with a cap n wrong across the top of the boards shall be provided along tate interior side lot limes up to a point no closer than 20' behind the front building line of the lot. Metal open fencing shall be provided for any fencing generally mining parallel to tate street. Matthews Court shall be designated as a 40' wide. utility. drainage. and emergency access easement as shoum on the Concept Play Hovivver. the easement for the bulb of the cube -sac shall have a 55' radius. while the paving of the cul-de-sac shall have a minimi 50-5' radius. 10- The alignment of Matthew s Court shall be as shoo -n on the Concept Plan_ bi4Trt+f+r~wsCotr&T a .: _ 1UY31.-'G"e Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 11 Previouslv Approved Development Standards (October 6, 2015) IMATTHE'VWS COURT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development shall take place in accordance with Section 14 (SF -20A SIIV(iLE FAMILY RE.SIDENTIAL DISTRICT) of the Southlake Zoning Ordinance, as amended, unless as otherwise identified below. L Matthews Court shall be developed in general accordance with the Concept Plan_ Z Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than 25, with an additional reduction of up to 25% (6.5') for trcc preservation. Said determination shall take place at the time of building permit submittal for the individual home and shall be agreed upon by the City as part of the building permit approval process. 3. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than 10'. 4. Rear Yard: 'ilhere shall be a rear yard of not less than 30', provided that on lots fronting on a cul-de- sac, there shall be a rear yard of not less than 25'. 5. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding 4tYY,, of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet. 6. Neighborhood Screening: Screening o£the neighborhood from Zena Rucker Road shall be accomplished with a combination of masonry wall and landscaping as shown on the Open Space Plan and Neighborhood Screening Exhibit Six foot (6') tall, open style metal fencing shall he provided along the western limits of the neighborhood. v Eight foot (8') tall, board -on -board cedar fencing with a cap running across the top of the boards shall be provided along the southern and eastern limits of the neighborhood. Metal poles shall be used with the cedar fencing. Additionally, any fence cross members shall be placed on the inside of the neighborhood. This perimeter fencing shall be stained a uniform color and shall be of a similar appearance as that which was built for the nearby Winding Crock neighborhood. With the exception of the screening along Zcna Rucker Road, which will be built in conjunction with the development of the neighborhood, the above referenced screening will be built in conjunction with the home construction on the aflec:ted IoL 7_ fencing: fencing provided for individual lots and not addressed as part of the neighborhood screening shall be provided as follows. }sight foot (8') tall board -<n -board cedar fencing with a cap running across the top of the boards shall be provided along the interior side lot lines up to a point no closer than 20' behind the front building line of the lot Metal open fencing %hail be provided for any fencing generally= running parallel to the street MAI tK WSCOMT P :s r r I1 JUL 24,2015 Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 12 8. The right-of-way for Matthews Court shall be 40' wide, as shown on the Concept Plan. However, the right -of --way for the bulla of the cul-de-sac shall have a 55' radius, while the paving of the cul-de-sac shall have a minimum 50.5' radius. 9. The alignment of Matthews Court shall be as shown on the Conccpt Plan. MATmEws COURT PAGE 12 JuL 24, 2015 Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 13 Proposed Proiect Purpose / Intent '%LkrrHE-%t:S £'otmT Matthews Court is a proposed restricted access_ eight lot. single family pocket neighborhood with two common greens situated at its front door_ 'These greens establish the first impression most people will have of the neighborhood as they are visiting residents or just passing by. A rezoning to the R -FUD district with specific regulations tailored for this neighborhood is being requested. A plat establishing the development pattern for the neighborhood accompanies the rezoning request. The property is located on the south side of the futtwe extension of Zena Rucker Road. Its western boundary is approximately 950` east of Byron Nelson Part-way and its eastern boundary is approximately 1500' west of S- Carroll Atienue_ In conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the nei`ebbothood by the City. Zena Rucker Road will be extended across those caherts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer as par of this project. This extension of Zena Rucker Road will bring it closer to its ultimate connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S. Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Part-way. PURPOSE and LN -TENT: The purpose of this rezoning request is to adjust the neighborhood plan prior to the traffic increasing on Zena Rucker Road to help m+nunize the traffic's impact on the neighborhood. A planted development and preliminary plat were approved for Matthews Court in the summer of 2015. The requested zoning for the property is the same as what was approved in 2015_ with the exception of the requested restricted access. (Item #21 in the enclo>ed Development Standards.) The revised plat assumes the rezoning request will be approved and changes the designation of Matthews Court from a dedicated nght-of-way to a private access easement with accompanying ancillary easements as needed. Due to the reconfiguration of the neighborhoods entrance. the configurations of the adjoining open spaces have changed. The proposed open space for the neighborhood continues to meet the City's requirements for open space. Additionally. the reconfigwred neighborhood entrance complies with the City's development standards for a residential subdivision with private streets. TREE PRESERVATION TION PL -k : Ouer the last 10 to 15 years the property has not been utilized for its previous residential or agricultural uses. With the tract being landlocled tery little. if any. maintenance has occurred and the quality and condition of trees on the property has deteriorated greatly. It is the plan and intent that this development will introduce a quality forestation with the requirement of each propertto plant a significant number of shade trees and utnderstory trees: trees that have been cultivated and bred to grow strong and tall. in the case of the shade trees and full and colorful in the case of the uniderstory trees. Also. these new trees can also tolerate the use of automatic irrigation systems required of each home in Matthews Court. Wid n the designated open spaces. the developer will also plant a significant number of trees as well as complimenting lower level landscape material and attractive hardscape. Specifically. every new home uvill be required to plant 24 caliper inches of shade trees being any combination of Lice Oat Burr Oak. Chinkapin OaL- American Elm. Lace Bark Elm. Loblolly Pine. MATTMrs COURT Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 14 Additionally. each new house shall be planted with ? understory trees being either Japanese Maple. Dogwood, Red Bud. The existing tree cover is approximately 34.8% of the property. Of that. approximately 45% is proposed to be preserved. Other trees totaling an additional 8.400 may be preserved based on the specific house footprints, which will increase the percentage to just less than 54%. The development standards require trees with a minimum additional 24 caliper inches to be planted on each home site_ At the time of planting. this will add an additional 471 square feet (approximately) of canopy area to each lot. This will increase the total potential canopy area to more than 5711"a initially-_ OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT and PRIVATE STREET _5.ALN"r'EN kNCE PLAN: At the north end of the proposed development. adjacent to Zena Rucker Road will be two open space lots_ On the east side of Matthews Court is Lot 9X being 11.19? square feet and on the west side is Lot l OX being 14.105 square feet. The open space is 10.0° o of the total site. Within the open space the city required Hike and Bile trail will be constructed to connect with the future trail to the east and the west. Also within the open space, sidewalk will be constructed to tie into the sidewalk to be constructed as homes are built on the east and west sides of Mattheu^s Court. the single cul de sac street within the development. The open space lots will have a mix of existing and neer trees as well as ground corer and turf grass. Overhead pedestrian portals will be constructed over both the east and west sidewalks leading into the residential lots and a structure with a small water feature will be constructed on the west side open space creating a more formal entry into the development. An entry sign identifying the subdivision may also be constructed within the open space. Maintenance of the open space lots and improvements made upon those lots will be the responsibility of the, to be created. Matthews Court Homeowners Association. It is estimated the annual maintenance and operating expense for the open space lots and improvements, will be 514.000 per year. Additionally, it is estimated the annual maintenance expense for Bre private street improvements. will be $6.000 per year. These funds will be generated from mandatory dues paid by the individual property owners at an initial rate of S250 per month. or $2.500 per year. It is understood that any change to the open space plans, following its initial approval by the City Council, will have to be approved by subsequent City Council action_ Within the Cotenants, Conditions and Restrictions for IvIatthews Court, to which all the lots will be subject a provision will state that: In the event the party responsible for maintenance of the open space fails to maintain all or any portion in reasonable order and conditions, the City of Southlake may_ but is not required to. assume responsibility for its maintenance and may enter the premises and tale actiom including extended maintenance. The cost of such maintenance may be charged to the Homeo►-mer-s Association, or to the individual property owners that make up the H...., __'s Association. and may include administrative costs and penalties. Such costs shall become a lien on all subdivision properties. DE17ELOPER AGREED MN -T ISSUES: Park Fees: Prior to presenting the Developer Agreement to the City Council for its approval_ the developer will meet with the Cin of Southlaie Pari Board and ask that the park fees normally due for this project be waived in trade for the developer making certain bridge enhancements and extending the Hike and Bile trail across the creel- to the west from the Matthews Court neighborhood, tying into the existing trail_ With the development of the creek crossing, we propose mal-ing bridge enhancements of railing and columns anchored bN an oversized column on the southwest comer of the bridge. generally in compliance with the City designed -wayfarer signage found elsewhere in Southlaie. The cost of the enhancements and hike and bike trail extension -will exceed the S24,000 of pari fees normally charged for the proposed project. MATTf3MS Collie: Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 15 Roact'Beldge Improvements and Road Impact Fees: The City of Southlake. through its approlmd Capital Improvement Plan has agreed to install the culverts, headwalls and make the necessary grading for the extension of Zena Rucker Road across the creel where the road currently terminates east of Byron Nelson Parkway- As Zena Rucker Road is identified on the City's Master `Thoroughfare Plan as a future collector street. and as a part of our development, we agree to dedicate a disproportionate amount of the right of way and construct a disproportionate amount of Zena Rucker Road. subject to reimbursements based on proportionality. In order for the extension to function properly because of the atypical right-of-way. the developer has worked with the City staff on a specific paring design which meets the needs of the City. yet can be built within the proposed right-of-way. MATTHEWS CU -7 - Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 16 Previouslv Approved Proiect Intent and Purpose (October 6, 2015) MATTHEWS COURT Matthews Court is a proposed eight lot, single family pocket neighborhood with two common greens situated at its front door. These greens establish the first impression most people will have of the neighborhood as they are visiting residents or just passing by. A rezoning to the R-Pl1D district with specific regulations tailored for this neighborhood is being requested. A plat establishing the development pattern for the neighborhood accompanies the rezoning request. The property is located on the south side of the future extension of Zcna Rucker Road. Its western boundary is approximately 950' east of Byron Nelson Parkway and its eastern boundary is approximately 1500' west of S. Carroll Avenue. In conjunction with the installation of culverts immediateh- west of the neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across those culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer. This extension of Z.ena Rucker Road will bring it closer to its ultimate connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S_ Carroll Avcnuc and Byron Nelson Parkway. PURPOSE" and INTENT: The purpose and intent for this zoning change is to allow for a single family residential development which is being further done in compliance with die City's Master Land Use Plan. R -PUD zoning is being utilized to create greater flexibility in designing single story homes, a trend and desire of the current market place. Also, by having reduced setbacks, greater flexibility will be given to builders and architects in positioning the houses and will bring die houses closer to the street, creating a more intimate and neighborly environment. Also, the greater flexibility in positioning the houses will allow and encourage the saving of any significant trees that might, otherwise, be last. Development shall take place in accordance with Section lel of the City of Southlake 'Zoning Ordinance (SIS -20A, Single family residential District), as amended, unless otherwise noted with the rezoning application. TREE PRESERVATION PIAN: Over the last 10 to 15 years the property has not been utilized for its previous residential or agricultural uses. With the tract being landlocked, very little, if any, maintenance has occurred and the quality and condition of trees on the property has deteriorated greatly. It is the plan and intent that this development will introduce a quality forestation with the requirement of each property to plant a significant number of shade trees and understory trees; trees that have been cultivated and bred to grow strong and tall, in the case of the shade trees and full and colorful in the case of die understory trees. Also, these new trees can also tolet•ate the use of automatic irrigation systems required of each home in Matthews Court. Within the designated open spaces, the developer will also plant a significant number of trees as well as complimenting lower level landscape material and attractive hardscape. Specifically, every new home will be required to plant 24 caliper inches of shade trees being any combination of Live flak, Burr Oak, C'hinkapin Oak, American Elm, Lace Bark Llrn, Loblolly Pine. Additionally, each new house shall he planted with 2 undo rstory trees being either Japanese Maple, Dogwood, Red Bud. IvLA,T I-IEws COURT Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 17 Of the existing 228 trees, there arc 168 trees not in the right of way. Of this number, 84 will be permitted to be rcmovcd with this development, either by the developer or the builder. Of those that arc to be removed, 77 arc Hackberry, Hercules Club or similar type tree. OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN: At the north end of the proposed development, adjacent to Lena Rucker Road will be two open space lots. On the east side of Matthews Court is Lot 9X being 11,192 square feet and on the west side is Lot IOZ being 15,832 square feet The open space is 10.3% of the total site. Within the open space the city required Hike and Bike trail will be constructed to connect with the future trail to the cast and the west_ Also within the open space, sidewalks will be constructed to tic into the sidewalks to be constructed as homes arc built on the cast and west sides of Matthews Court, the single cul de sac street within the development. 'lhc opcn space lots will have a mix of existing and new trees as well as ground cover and turf grass. C h-crhead pedestrian portals will be constructed over both the east and west sidewalks leading into the residential lots and a structure with a small water feature will be constructed on the west side open space creating a more formal entry into the development. An entry sign identifying Ilse subdivision may also be constructed within the open space. Maintenance of the open space lots and improvements made upon those lots will be the responsibility of the, to be created, Matthews Court Homeowners Association. It is estimated the annual maintenance and operating expense for the open space lots and improvements, will be 516,000 per year. 'these funds will be generated from mandatory dues paid by the individual property owners at an initial rate of 5250 per month, or $2,000 per year. It is understood that any change to the open space plan, following its initial approval by the City Council, will have to be approved by subsequent City Council action. Within the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Matthews Court, to which all the lots will be subject, a provision will state that: "In the event the party responsible for maintenance of the open space fails to maintain all or any portion in reasonable order and condition, the City of Southlake may, but is not required to, assume responsibility for its maintenance and may enter the premises and take corrective action, including extended maintenance. The cost of such maintenance may be charged to the Homeowner's Association, or to the individual property owners that make up the Homeowner's Association, and may include administrative costs and penalties. Such costs shall become a lien on all subdivision properties. DEVELOPER AGREEMENT ISSUES: 1. Park Tees: Prior to presenting the Developer Agreement to the City Council for its approval, the developer will meet with the City of Southlake Park Board and ask that the park fees normally due for this project be waived in trade for the developer making certain bridge enhancements and extending the Hike and Bike trail across the creek, to the west from the Matthews Court neighborhood, tying into the existing trail. With the development of the creek crossing, we propose making bridge enhancements of railing and columns anchored by an oversized column on the southwest comer of the bridge, generally in compliance with the City designed wayfarer signage found elsewhere in Southlake. Ilie cost of the enhancements and hike and bike trail extension will exceed the $24,000 of park lees normally charged for the proposed project. 2. Road/Bridge Improvements and Road Impact Tees: The City of Southlake, through its approved Capital Improvement Plan, has agreed to install the culverts, headwalls and make the necessary grading for the extension of 7.ena Rucker Road across the creek inhere the read currently terminates east of Byron Nelson Parkway. As 7ena Rucker Road is identified on the City's MaHter Thoroughfare Plan as a future collector street, and as a part of our development, we agree to dedicate a disproportionate amount of the right of way and construct a disproportionate amount of Lena Rucker Road, subject to reimbursements based on proportionality. MATTHEWS ('()� "RT Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 18 Proposed Screening and Fencinq Exhibit �IW�d.ryro nu:I -EU- I�la s*5 wT rtcec� '+x+ = MC fi..Crt[N MMR rlAyCi - - _. as• _ a- a _�__.,- �` I.�A _ _ c.R4J.LrKnEiR.� �R, I. 11 r .wd�iv4 'r -`Aff 1301—.r . - - .. a a.( r, N:. _. _iii _• 11, 4 ca � yq R 10' sw raWa �E:ga.cK. - r rAgO-- 6OPEN AFETAL FENCING B' BOARD ON BOARD W/CAP CEDAR FENCING MASONRY WALL PER OPEN SPACE DESIGN 'FENCING SHOWN WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN A DEDICATED DRAINAGE EASEMENT. ZA 16-045 N SCREENING AND MATTHEWS COURT FENCING EXHIBIT Case No. Attachment C ZA16-045 Page 19 R1 SOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN2015-23 Project Name: Matthews Court SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #9 Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: 2 Host: Bobbie Heller, Community Engagement Committee Applicant(s) Presenting: Tom Matthews City Staff Present: Jerod Potts, Planner I; Dennis Killough, Deputy Director of Planning and Development Services; Mike White, Chief Building Inspector City Staff Contact: Dennis Killough, Deputy Director of Planning and Development Services (817) 748-8072 + Attached to the end of this report are the Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the 6123/2015 SPIN Town Hall Forum Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting httPJ1 ww.citvofsouthlakP,rnm, and clicking on "Learn More' under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY Property Situation: + Near Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Rd. Development Details: • Generally the project is south of Southlake Blvd., in between Byron Nelson Pkwy. to the west and Carroll Ave. to the east on the south side of the future Zena Rucker Rd. • Presenter noted that in cooperation with the City, the culverts are going to be put in crossing this creek that will allow the road to put it for this project and there will only remain a small section for the completion of Zena Rucker Rd. • The existing zoning on the property is. Agricultural • Presenter mentioned the future land use plan for this area is medium density residential • Application for zoning is for a PUD • Presenter noted the project is 8 lots on 5.3 acres all of the lots are over 20,000 square feet Case No. Attachment D ZA16-045 Page 1 o Could have zoned SF -20 but wanted to do things that would enhance the lots such as reducing setbacks to create a more intimate feel o Reducing the setbacks on the front, rear, and side yard would encourage and allow single story homes to be built Presenter mentioned the project has incorporated green space to the north which includes a walking trail that would tie into the trail on the north side of the Winding Creek development Presenter mentioned that on the east side of the property, the plan is to reduce the setbacks in order to incorporate existing trees into the project to preserve them Presenter noted that at the entrance to the subdivision the pathway contains a raised arbor on either side of the entrance; also there will be patterned concrete or paved stone at the entrance Details of the PUD are noted in the slides below Presented at SPIN: Case No. ZA16-045 Attachment D Page 2 Case No. ZA16-045 z 0 N Y N G Attachment D Page 3 u.. WUdlI UcSiti MATfHEWS COURT ACRES: 5.3 {NET R.O.W.} HOMES: 8 DENSITY. 1.5 HOMES/NETAC SOUTHLAKE COMPREHENSIVE PLANT: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (>I HOME/ACRE) OPEN SPACE: 0.6 AC (10.3%) Development shall take place in accordance with Section 14 (SF -20A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) ofthe Southlake Zoning Ordinance, as amended. unless as otherwise identified below. I. Matthews Court shall be developed in general accordance with the Concept Plan. 2, Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than 25', with an additional reduction of up to 25% (6.5') for tree preservation. 3. Side Yard: Them shall be a side yard of not less than 10'. 4. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than 30', provided that on lots fronting on a cul-de- sac, there shall be a rear yard of not less than 25'. 5. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding 40%. ofthe lot area, except the sum total of accessary buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet. For purposes ofthis section, an unenclosed arborlgazebo, which is not strucrura0y integrated into the primary building on the lot, shall not count towards the maximum lot coverage. 6. The right -if --way for Matthews Court shall be 40' wide, as shown on the Concept Plan. However, the right-of-way for the bulb ofthe cul-de-sac shall have a 50' radius, while the paving ofthe cul-de-sac shall have a minimum 40' radius. 7. The alignment of Matthews Court shall be as shown on the Concept Plan. O P E N D E V L O P M E N T S T A N D A R D S Case No. Attachment D ZA16-045 Page 5 Case No. ZA16-045 L Attachment D Page 6 QUESTIONS I CONCERNS: • The land to the west is a waterway; so that's always going to be green? Area is owned by the school district and some portions are owned by Timarron as open space • How do you propose to fence between the yards and along the back line, especially on the eastern side? The eastern side will be solid wooden fence — there will be wood fencing between the lots side-to-side. The fronts will have open style fencing, wrought iron fencing. • What size of home are you expecting to go onto these lots by square footage? You said you are going to PUD; explain what you get by going PUD? The reason for doing PUD as opposed to SF -20, is it gives more flexibility on positioning and designing the house — many of these SF -20 lots, everybody has to go up. PUD allows the project to bring the houses forward. It also allows people the possibility of designing a single -story house. An advantage is that a PUD gives the City a right to say yes or no. We expect houses to be 3,500 square feet on up. Hesitant to dictate the house size. Probably will put a minimum on them. • Do you know if Zena Rucker has plans for the remaining land that is hers? No — except for the commercial land. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes: rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public ofthe issues and questionsraised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-045 Page 7 Blackboard connect This message has been sent! Here is a summary of the delivery results. Click here to view more information online. Delivery Summery Title SPIN Torn Hall Forum for 6123/2015 Message Type Outreach Site CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Scheduled By PILAR SCHANK Send Time 06/17/2015 05:30 PM (CT) Voice Completed 06/17/2015 06:13 PM (CT) Text Completed 08/17/2015 05:32 PM (CT) Email Completed 08/17/2015 05:30 PM (CT) Selected Contacts 10764 Successfully reached 7538 (70%) Languages English' Device Dellverles 69%(7307) 10575 96%(155} 161 rtl 97%(544) 559 Detailed 091WM Results Case No. Attachment D ZA16-045 Page 8 Voice3) Good Afternoon this is Pilar Schank with the City of Southlake. A SPIN town hall forum will take place next Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at bpm concerning the following items. 1. SPIN2015-21: SPIN #9 will discuss the rezoning and re -plating of 13.8+ acres into 3 residential lots at 911 & 859 S. White Chapel Blvd. 2. SPIN2015-23: SPIN #9 will discuss the residential development of 8 lots on 5.8 acres of land near Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Road. 3. SPIN2015-22: The City of Southlake will discuss revisions to zoning ordinance 480, subdivision 483, and sign ordinance 704-G. Again, a SPIN Town Hall Forum will be held June 23, 2015 at 6pm in the Town Hall Council Chamber. For more information go to City of Southlake. com Thank you for your attention. Have a great day. Successful Deliveries 69%(7307) Live Delivery 2767 Answering Machine 4540 Unsuccessful Deliveries 31%(3268) Hangup 48 Fax/Modem 333 Opted -Out 19 Undeliverable 617 Busy 55 No Answer 1824 Phone Network Busy 3 Bad Phone Number 372 Email A SPIN town hall forum will take place next Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 6pm concerning the following items. 1. SPIN2015-21: SPIN #9 will discuss the rezoning and re -plating of 13.8+ acres into 3 residential lots at 911 & 859 S. Whtte Chapel Blvd. 2. SPIN2015-23: SPIN #9 will discuss the residential development of 8 lots on 5.8 acres of land near Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Road. 3. SPIN2015-22: The City of Southlake will discuss revisions to zoning ordinance 480, subdivision 483, an ... Email Sent 97% (544) Email Opted -Out 3%(15) SMS A SPIN town hall forum will take place next Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 6pm in the City Council Chamber. More information: http://bit.ty11Bl6yyR Text Email Sent 96%(155) Text Not Sent 2%(4) Text Opted -Out 1% (1) Invalid Text Phone 1% (1) For support, please call (866) 360-2155 or email conriectsupport@blackboard.com Case No. Attachment D ZA16-045 Page 9 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA16-045 Review No.: Two Project Name: Zoning Change and Development Plan — Matthews Court APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, LLC Tom Matthews 2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120-323 Southlake, Texas, 76092 Phone: 214-676-3434 Fax: 817-481-4074 Email: tmatthews@fourpeaksdev.com Date of Review: 6/3/16 OWNER: Landlock LLC, c/o Warren Clark Development Dale Clark 16390 Addison Rd. Addison, Texas, 75001 Phone: 972-931-8971 Fax: 972-931-8975 Email: do@wcdevelopment.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/23/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT JEROD POTTS AT (817) 748-8195. Planning Review Jerod Potts Planner I Phone: (817) 748-8195 Email: ipotts6d)ci.southlake.tx.us Regarding the written narrative: a. Describe the use, operation, phasing, infrastructure to be provided, etc. Note, this development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of offsite R.O.W. and construction of a portion of Zena Rucker Rd. Clarify this in the narrative. b. Change all references from "concept plan" within the narrative, development regulations and anywhere else to "development plan." C. In terms of that phasing, the development plan states that anticipated start date for this project is 4th Quarter 2015. Please correct the phasing on the development plan, and in the narrative if necessary. 2. The open space management plan as submitted does not address the following requirement within Section 33.20, Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Update the open space plan to address the requirement within this section. 33.20 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLANS — For all development proposing any private or public open space, an open space management plan is required that: 5. Provides for enforcement of the plan; 3. Where a private street is requested, Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, requires the following: Comment 3 and comments 4 and 5 that follow all specifically reference Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.05 Private Street Standards in Residential Subdivisions. Below, please note the following items regarding maintenance, easements and access restrictions. (Sections 5.05 A, B, C, D, E, and F): A. Maintenance Cost: A homeowner's association is responsible for the cost of maintenance of private streets. The City shall have no responsibility for and shall not pay for any portion of the cost of maintaining a private street. Case No. Attachment E ZA16-045 Page 1 B. City Services: The City has no obligation to maintain private streets. Depending on the characteristics of the proposed private street subdivision, the City may not provide certain other services. Among the services which may not be provided are routine police patrols, enforcement of traffic and parking ordinances, and preparation of accident reports. C. Maintenance Standards: Maintenance, amenities, and landscaping of private streets shall conform to the same standards regulating the maintenance, amenities, and landscaping of public streets. 5-11 D. Retention of Easements: A utility, drainage, and emergency access easement shall be retained in private streets by the City and other utility companies: 1. providing unrestricted use of the property for utilities and their maintenance; 2. extending easement rights to all utility providers including telecable companies operating within the City; 3. providing the City with the right of access for any purpose related to the exercise of a governmental service or function, including but not limited to fire and police protection, inspection and code enforcement; and 4. permitting the City to remove any vehicle or obstacle within the private street lot that impairs emergency access. Proposed Matthews Court will be a private access, emergency access, drainage and utility easement. The lot needs to be dedicated to and maintained by the homeowner's association. E. City Assumption of Maintenance: The City shall be the sole judge of whether repairs to a private street are needed. If a homeowner's association, its successors or assigns, fail or refuse to adequately maintain private streets and related appurtenances, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to assume temporarily the duty of performing the association's maintenance obligations at any time after the expiration of sixty (60) days after receipt by the association, its successors or assigns of written notice from the city specifying the nature and extent of the failure to maintain. 1. Upon assuming such maintenance obligations, the City shall have the right to collect, when they become due, the assessments levied by the homeowner's association for the purposes of repairing and maintaining the private streets and related appurtenances, and if necessary, the City shall have the right to enforce the payment of delinquent assessments in the manner set forth in the association's documents. 2. The City shall also have the right to levy an assessment upon each lot on a pro rata basis for the cost of such maintenance, which assessment shall constitute an assessment lien upon the lot against which each assessment is made. 3. Under no circumstances, shall the City be liable to the association or any lot owner or their respective heirs, successors or assigns for negligent acts or omissions relating in any manner to maintaining, improving and preserving the private streets and related appurtenances. F. Access Restrictions: The entrances to all private streets shall be marked with a sign stating that it is a private street. Either a guard house or an access control device such as a gate or cross arm shall be constructed at each entrance. All restricted access entrances shall be manned 24 hours every day, or an alternative means shall be provided of ensuring access to the subdivision by the City and other utility service providers with appropriate identification. If the association fails to maintain reliable access as required 4. Please note the following Restricted Access Entrance Design Standards from the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.05.G: G. Restricted Access Entrance Design Standards: Private streets which have access controlled by a gate, cross arm, or other access control device shall conform to the following requirements: 1. The street must have a minimum uninterrupted pavement width of 24 feet at the location of the access control device. Case No. Attachment E ZA16-045 Page 2 2. If an overhead barrier is used, it shall have a minimum height above the road surface as required by the Fire Code for fire lanes. 3. The design of all gates, cross arms and access control devices, including automatic opening systems and manual backup systems, shall be approved by the Fire Department before installation. 4. The gates, cross arms, and access control devices shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department before being put into operation. 5. Gate designs may incorporate one or two gate sections to meet the required minimum width of 24 feet. 6. If the entrance incorporates a median, guard shack, or similar structure that necessitates a divided gate arrangement, the gate and street pavement widths may be reduced if approved by the Fire Department. This approval shall be contingent upon the subdivision with private streets having a second approved means of access, but in no case shall any single gate or street pavement have a clear opening of less than 15 feet. 5. Regarding the private gate to the subdivision, note the following design standards items from Subdivision Ordinance (Sections 5.05 H, I, and J): H. Visitor Entrance Design Standards: At least one entrance to a subdivision with private streets shall be equipped for visitor access. In addition to the above Restricted Access Entrance Design Standards, the visitor entrance shall be equipped with a call or code box located at least 50 feet from the boundary of the subdivision to provide for visitors calling in an automobile queuing. A turn -around space with a minimum outside radius of 30 feet shall be located between any call or code box and the access control device to allow vehicles denied access to safely exit onto public streets in a "head out" position. A sign shall be erected next to the edge of such turn around space to prohibit vehicle parking in such space. A residents entrance used in combination with a visitor entrance shall comply with the requirements of this paragraph. Resident Only Entrance Design Standards: In addition to the above Restricted Access Entrance Design Standards, an access control device that requires residents to use a key, card, or code to gain access shall setback internally a minimum of 50 feet from the boundary of the subdivision to provide for automobile queuing; except, that resident entrances equipped with an electronic opener that allows residents to remotely open the 5-13 access control device and enter the subdivision without having to stop are exempted from this requirement. A sign shall be erected next to any resident entrance that does not meet the 50 foot setback requirement of this paragraph and does not provide a turn -around space with a minimum outside radius of 30 feet to indicate that it is for resident use only and not for visitors. J. Cost of Design Standards: The homeowner's association shall pay the cost of complying with required design standards. 6. Existing overhead utilities need to be relocated. All new franchise utilities must be placed underground and ground equipment screened in accordance with Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 Section 8.05. Applicant has included note on Development Plan. 7. Note Public Works Engineering comments below regarding fencing along the west property line. No fences can be built within the flood plain. The screening and fencing exhibit includes a note to this effect, but the exhibit itself shows fencing that appears to encroach into the flood plain. Please consider revising this plan to show fencing meeting this requirement. The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may benefit and does not represent a reauirement. Case No. Attachment E ZA16-045 Page 3 • Staff recommends providing a materials sample board. All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations. Building Inspections Review Susan Hernandez Deputy Building Official Phone: (817) 748-8238 Fax: (817) 748-8241 E-mail: shernandez@ci.southlake.tx.us Separate permit required for open space features - tower, shade structure, water feature, stone wall, etc. Demolition permit required for removal of barn/stable. Contact Christi Upton for notification of removal of existing water well. Public Works/Engineering Review Alex Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8274 Fax: (817) 748-8077 E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. A Developer Agreement shall be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. 3. Label distance between median Lot 2X, Block B and the edge of pavement of Lots 1 and 8. Distance shall be sufficient width and approved by the Fire Marshal. 4. Proposed private streets must be constructed to conform to City street standards. Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: httr)://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.asi)x?N I D=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Limits of 100- year floodplain shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage easement. Case No. Attachment E ZA16-045 Page 4 2. Fences will not be allowed within dedicated drainage easements along the western property line of Lots 1, 2 and 3. Water, sanitary sewer and storm drain lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Extend 8" Sanitary Sewer to east side of right of way along Zena Rucker Road. Ordinance No. 440. 2. Proposed 8" sanitary sewer shall be located in parkway - not under pavement, except for crossings. 3. Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary sewer system built to City standards. 4. Extend 8" Waterline to southern property line along dedicated 15' utility easement. 5. All water line stubs must have 2 joints past the valve with a 2" blow -off per the City's details. 6. Water and sanitary sewer lines in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. Minimum size for water and sanitary sewer lines is 8". Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1" inch meter must have a 1" tap, etc. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to approval of construction plans. Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed. Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #23 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($309.83/Acre). Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: httr)://www.citvofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asiD New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially Case No. Attachment E ZA16-045 Page 5 reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. * NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Most of the existing trees on the site are pioneering tree species that have grown on the site in the past 5 to 10 years. They consist of Hackberry, Cedar Elm, and American Elm which are multi -trunked or in clusters that sprouted after being brush hogged and then left to grow. The most prominent quality trees are along the west property boundary of the property where they are proposed to be preserved. The Developer has also chosen the most prominent quality trees in the interior of the property to preserve. The proposed zoning for the development is Residential Planned Unit Development, R -PUD and is subject to City Council Approval of the Tree Conservation Plan as presented. The existing tree cover is approximately 39.8% and under straight zoning a minimum of 60% of the existing tree cove would be required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 45.4% of the existing trees cover and another 8.4% may possibly preserve depending on the individual lot grading. A possible 53.7% of existing tree cover could be preserved. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Case No. Attachment E ZA16-045 Page 6 Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the the entire site existing tree cover to be preserved* 0%-20% 70% 20.1 —40% 60% 40.1%-60% 50% 60.1%-80% 40% 80.1%-100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S -P-1 Site Plan, S -P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall considerthe application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Case No. Attachment E ZA16-045 Page 7 Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 Fax: (817) 748-8181 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: The gated entry, if approved, must be equipped with an Opticom or KS -2 switch for opening the gate electronically, as well as a means for manual opening. Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (A minimum of 85,000 lbs GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to back of curb. (Standard street width) (Plans do not indicate appropriate street widths along all areas that parallel residential lots) Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager Phone: (817) 748-8607 Fax: (817) 748-8027 Email: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee credits and/or acceptance of land dedication. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $3000 per dwelling unit x 8 dwelling units= $24,000.00 . Pathway Comments: Review termination of east pathway along Zena Rucker. Should terminate in R.O.W so that adjacent property can connect. Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right -Of -Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. Informational Comments: Regarding the Site Data Summary Chart - consider a separate chart for the proposed R -PUD district regulations Case No. Attachment E ZA16-045 Page 8 Ensure that all easements on or adjacent to the site, if any, are shown, labeled and dimensioned with the type and record instrument number. Show any critical easements, drainage, and/or flood plains. The applicant is proposing to build the private street as part of the PUD regulations. Per Section 5.04 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended: Private streets are not permitted in new subdivisions in which less than 75% of the lots contain homeowner occupied structures. An existing subdivision zoned for residential use may be converted to a subdivision with private streets in place of public streets in compliance with this section. For purposes of this section, "existing subdivision" means a platted subdivision in which 75% or more of the lots contain homeowner occupied structures. Zena Rucker Road is designated as a 2 -lane collector (C2U) with a minimum 60' R.O.W. required. A minimum radius of 400' and minimum tangent length of 50' between curves is required per Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Park Fees and Road/Bridge Improvements credits or reimbursements are matters subject to approval of a Developer's Agreement by City Council. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21, Building Color Standards for Non -Residential Buildings. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZA16-045 Page 9 Surrounding Propertv Owners 2.94908994 NR 15.83000000 NR 2.30043760 NR BILLY WAYNE & CAROLYN JEAN 4.52200976 1 NR AG NR 1.88132447 HAY 0.92941067 807 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2. CARROLL, ISD RPUD 301 BYRON NELSON PKWY 50.44504566 DEVANE CLARKE PARTNERSHIP NR 3. SP2 LTD 731 ZENA RUCKER RD HCP CRS2 LTACH-BAYLOR 4. SP1 SOUTHLAK 731 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 5. LANDLOCK LLC AG 851 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 6. LANDLOCK LLC AG 835 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 7. NOORNEEL LLC SP1 751 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 8. RUCKER, ZENA SULLIVAN SP2 805 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9. RUCKER, ZENA SULLIVAN SP2 803 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 10. RUCKER, ZENA SULLIVAN TR AG 841 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 11. RUCKER, ZENA SULLIVAN TR AG 650 S CARROLL AVE 12. Superintendent of Carroll ISD Superintendent of Grapevine 13. Colleyville ISD 14. Superintendent of Keller ISD 15. Superintendent of Northwest ISD 16. TIMARRON OWNERS ASSN INC RPUD 700 GREYMOOR PL 17. WEATHERFORD LOAN COMPANY SP1 835 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 18. ZELDA PARTNERS LTD AG 811 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided Responses Received: In Favor: (1) Opposed To: (0) Undecided: (0) 2.94908994 NR 15.83000000 NR 2.30043760 NR ►[Linz NR NR 5.78300000 NR 2.68925228 NR 6.80220864 NR NR: No Response No Response: (17) Case No. Attachment F ZA16-045 Page 1 NR 4.52200976 3.87809348 NR 1.52472038 NR 1.88132447 F 0.92941067 NR 0.72128280 NR 4.36715365 NR 50.44504566 NR NR ►[Linz NR NR 5.78300000 NR 2.68925228 NR 6.80220864 NR NR: No Response No Response: (17) Case No. Attachment F ZA16-045 Page 1 Surroundinq Propertv Owner Responses May' 1C 1t$LrZ:Wp Noomee+ 81/41ti/51t19 Notification Response Farm Z.A16-045 Meeting Date: June 9, 2046 at 6.30 PM NCORNEEL LLC 704 GATESHEAD CT SDUTHLAKE. TX 76092 p.1 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of 1 opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposes Zon:mg Change and Development Flan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: ,'e A e'r;` *-��� � �r— ,� Lf,• o (t;d us Signature: %-•, Date:/'tk-f Additional Signature: 54'voecp SA/Vvou Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property _-n-tens] wno5e narne(sl are printed a1 lop. G;hen"se contact the Planning DepannvW Om !inn EPplo"ty. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment G ZA16-045 Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-701 a AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS OF TRACTS 3D, 31132 AND 3, OBEDIAH W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.8 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "RPUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO "RPUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, Case No. Attachment H ZA16-045 Page 1 WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, Case No. Attachment H ZA16-045 Page 2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safetyfrom fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 5.8 acres, and more fully and completely described in exhibit "A" from "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District to "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District as depicted on the approved development plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following conditions: RESERVED FOR CITY COUNCIL MOTION Case No. Attachment H ZA16-045 Page 3 SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this Case No. Attachment H ZA16-045 Page 4 ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section Case No. Attachment H ZA16-045 Page 5 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1St reading the 21St day of June, 2016. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 2nd day of August, 2016. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. ZA16-045 Attachment H Page 6 Being described as Portions of Tracts 3D, 31D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 5.8 acres, and more fully and completely described below: RESERVED FOR METES AND BOUNDS Case No. ZA16-045 Attachment H Page 7 i::4:n11M:M RESERVED FOR APPROVED EXHIBITS Case No. ZA16-045 Attachment H Page 8