Item 7A 13 CITY OF
SOUTHLAI<.,,E
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 2016
CASE NO: ZA16-045
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Landlock LLC, c/o Warren Clark Development, Four Peaks
Development, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan
for Matthews Court from "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development to"R-PUD"
Residential Planned Unit Development District with base SF-20A Zoning on
approximately 5.8 acres on property described as portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3,
Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas, generally located south of Zena Rucker Road approximately 1,000 feet east of
Byron Nelson Parkway and addressed as 851 and 841 E Southlake Blvd. and 650 S.
Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #9.
DETAILS: Four Peaks Development, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and
Development Plan for Matthews Court from the current"R-PUD" Residential Planned
Unit Development District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District
for the development of approximately 5.8 acres consisting of eight(8) residential lots
and four (4) open space lots, to be served by a gated private street. The following
table is the Matthews Court site data summary information and development
regulations as proposed:
Mafthews Court-Site Data Summary
Approved (ZA15-070) Proposed (ZA16-045) SF-20A
No.of Residential Lots 8 8 NIA
Avg. Lot Size +1-22,197 +1-21,660 NIA
No. of Open Space Lots 2 4 NIA
No. of Private Street Lots NIA 1 NIA
Gross Acreage 5.8 Acres 5.8 Acres NIA
Density 1.5 DUINetAcre 1.5 DUINetAcre 2.18 DUINetAcre
Open Space Acreage(°/°) 0.62 Acre(10.68%) 0.60 Acre(10.36%) NIA
Development
Minimum Lot Size 20,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft.
Maximum Height 2 M!stories/35 ft. 2 M!stories/35 ft. 2'/�stories/35 ft.
Not less than 25 ft.,with Not less than 25 ft.,with
Front Yard Setback an additional reduction of an additional reduction Not less than 35ft
up to 25% (6.5 ft.)for of up to 25% (6.5 ft.)for
tree preservation tree preservation
Side Yard Setback Not less than 10 ft_ Not less than 10 ft_ Not less than 15 ft.
Not less than 30 ft., Not less than 30 ft., Not less than 40 ft.,
Rear Yard Setback provided that lots provided that lots provided that lots
fronting on a cul-de-sac fronting on a cul-de-sac fronting on a cul-de-
not less than 25 ft. not less than 25 ft. sac, not less than 35 ft.
Maximum Lot Coverage 40% 40% 30%
Case No.
ZA16-045
The applicant is proposing to construct Zena Rucker Road per the requirements of the
Master Thoroughfare Plan.The road has been aligned such that it can be constructed
on the subject property.The City will be installing a box culvert at the creek to the west
of the property to allow Zena Rucker Road to be extended east. The applicant has
agreed to install a bridge to the west of the proposed Matthews Court neighborhood.
Future R.O.W. dedication of the Hayes' property to the north may be required at the
time of development of their property to ensure adequate parkway for a sidewalk and
utilities along the north side of Zena Rucker Road. Dedication is estimated to be less
than 200 square feet.
A Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court was previously approved
by City Council on October 6, 2015 (ZA15-070).The purpose of the proposed revision
to the approved plan is to modify the current"R-PUD"zoning and development plan to
allow for Matthews Court to be a gated private street.
This Zoning Change and Development Plan is related to and being processed
concurrently with a Preliminary Plat application under Planning Case No. ZA16-046.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Consider 1St Reading Approval of Zoning Change and Development Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) SPIN Meeting Report
(E) Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 3, 2016
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(G) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(H) Ordinance No. 480-701a
(1) Full Size Plans (for the City Council Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Jerod Potts (817) 748-8195
Case No.
ZA16-045
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Landlock LLC, c/o Warren Clark Development
APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located south of Zena Rucker Road approximately 1,000 feet east of
Byron Nelson Parkway and addressed as 851 and 841 E Southlake Blvd. and
650 S. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No.
899
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District
REQUESTED ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District
HISTORY: October 6, 2015—City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development
Plan for Matthews Court (ZA15-070, Ord. No. 480-701)
October 6, 2015—City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for Matthews Court
(ZA15-071)
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for the original project(ZA15-070)on June
23, 2015 at Southlake Town Hall.A SPIN Town Hall Forum has not been held
for the revised project (ZA16-045). A SPIN Meeting Report from the June 23,
2015 SPIN Town Hall Forum is included as Attachment "D" of this report.
SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates this property as
Medium Density Residential.As proposed,this development is consistent with
the Future Land Use Plan. The image to the right illustrates the Future Land
Use for the proposed location.
Future LandUse Land Ilse Designafnn:
Matthews Court Medium Density Resldenual
Future Land Use
.. •• }oD-Year Plaod Plain
—Corya o}E n0 ineere Property
Pu6c ParklOpen Space
aanb -PuEfGSomi•PlAlit
f — '' Low DtaiMty Residential
RD 'Medium peneity,Residential
V MRrcc Cammcrclal
-Retail Commercial
-Mixed use
—Town Center
Regional Retail
-Ineustnal
1 _
i
iL 1
i ° 1
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-045 Page 1
Master Thoroughfare Plan
Zena Rucker Road currently does not connect between Byron Nelson Parkway
and Carroll Avenue. Access to this proposed subdivision is contingent upon
the construction of Zena Rucker Road, which according to the Southlake
Master Thoroughfare Plan is designated as a 2-lane collector (C2U) with a
minimum 60' R.O.W. required. A minimum radius of 400' and minimum
tangent length of 50' between curves is required per Subdivision Ordinance
No. 483. This development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of
offsite R.O.W. and construction of a portion of Zena Rucker Road. Note, the
applicant is not proposing to finish the connection of Zena Rucker Road
between Byron Nelson Parkway and Carroll Avenue;the street is proposed to
be extended from its terminus near the west boundary of this site to the east
boundary leaving approximately 600'to the nearest cross street and terminus
to the east.
Mobility Master Plan
The Mobility Master Plan recommends the extension of Zena Rucker Road
east to S. Carroll Avenue. Below is the recommendation as written within the
Mobility Master Plan. The proposal for Matthews Court states that in
conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the
neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these
culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which
will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower
Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S.
Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway.
Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
Recommendations
As Rucker Extend Rucker Assist in Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW
and Prade Road east to S bridging the Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3,
properties Carroll Ave. floodplain to Cl,C2 Options 3.5,
develop, Roadways are enable the 3.9
MT traffic anticipated to be completion of
12 volumes constructed as the Rucker
are development extension
expected to occurs with city project.
increase participation in
along FM bridging the
1709. floodplain.
Pathways/Sidewalk Plan
The Official Pathways Map, adopted by City Council on January 7, 2014
designates that the north side of Zena Rucker Road is designated as having
a future sidewalk that is less than 8 feet wide and the south side of Zena
Rucker Road is designated as having a future multiuse trail that is greater
than or equal to 8 feet wide. The pedestrian access plan for Matthews Court
shows a continuation of the existing 8 foot wide hike & bike trail on the south
side of future Zena Rucker Road, which was designed to connect with the
future trail to the east and the west.
Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan
The Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan was approved by City Council on September
20, 2011. The following recommendations are relevant to the medium density
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-045 Page 2
cluster residential area designated on the Illustrative Recommendations Map
(below chart).
Ref. Issue Recommendation
No.
1. Land use designation Medium Retain the Medium Density Residential
Density Residential designation for the area south of Zena
Rucker Road
2. Considerable amount of area
LU3 dedicated to floodplain and other Encourage"cluster" residential
water features development
Preserve heavily wooded areas,
especially within drainage areas and
floodplain
1. Environmental stewardship and Encourage water reuse for irrigation
innovation in green building
Encourage green building design
2. Reserved open space/landscape practices
areas require heavy irrigation
E2 Preserve and enhance existing ponds
3. On-site drainage detention facilities
Reflect the desired preservation on the
Carroll/1709 Small Area Illustrative Map
on the Environmental Resource
Protection map
1. Desire to decrease dependence on Development should be pedestrian
the automobile for everyday needs oriented,emphasizing pedestrian
connectivity in any residential areas.
M1 2. Two schools,shopping and offices all
within close proximity of the site Provide passive trails through preserved
natural areas which also provide
connectivity to the sidewalk system
1. Create a vibrant and appealing Provide curvilinear streets
M3 streetscape along the area's local
streets Provide street trees between the
sidewalk and the street curb
1.A landscaped parkway concept with Consider the creation of a new 60' ROW
minimal pavement is desired for Zena 2-lane divided collector(C2D)with
Rucker Road medians and left-turn/stacking lanes at
intersections in the Mobility Plan to
2. Landscaped medians preferred apply to Zena Rucker Road
M4 3. No on-street, parallel parking is "Urban"cross section which includes
desired curb,gutters, medians,street trees and
sidewalks.
Speed limit not to exceed 30 m.p.h.
Design as a local slow movement
roadway.
1.Appropriately buffer and screen Recommend a parkway buffer and
U2 residential south of Zena Rucker Road street trees adjacent to Rucker Road.
from any non-residential uses to the
north side of Zena Rucker Road
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-045 Page 3
Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan Illustrative Recommendations Map.
DensityMedium
Cluster Residential
I �
CD
_4 01
E
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
Portions of Zena Rucker Road have been constructed from Byron Nelson
Parkway and from S. Carroll Avenue. The proposal for Matthews Court states
that in conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the
neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these
culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which
will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower
Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S.
Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway.
Traffic Impact
Use Units pd /IN OUT IN •
UT
Single-Family Detached 8 76 2 4 5 3
Housing (210)
• Vehicle Trips Per Day
"AM-In,AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
"Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7t"Edition
UTILITIES: Water
The applicant is proposing a connection to an existing eight inch (8")water line
running north of the existing portion of Zena Rucker Road. The Preliminary
Water& Sanitary Sewer Layout for Matthews Court shows that the proposed
eight inch (8")water line and valve will stub out with at nearly the same place
as the end of the proposed extension of Zena Rucker Road (at the end of the
Matthews Court Subdivision). The applicant is proposing an 8 inch (8")water
line and valve to run along the east side of proposed Matthews Court road in
order to service the subdivision.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-045 Page 4
Sewer
The applicant will be extending 8 inch (8") sewer from a sewer manhole
located between Rockenbaugh Elementary and Lot 4, Block 1 Pecan Creek.
The applicant is proposing an 8 inch (8")sanitary sewer main to run along the
west side of proposed Matthews Court road in order to service the subdivision.
The Preliminary Water & Sanitary Sewer Layout for Matthews Court shows
sanitary sewer being extended to the northeast corner of the Matthews Court
subdivision south of Zena Rucker Road.
TREE PRESERVATION: There is approximately 39.8% tree canopy coverage, and the applicant is
proposing to preserve as much as 53.7% of that tree cover. There is
approximately 8.4% of that cover that is marginal and could potentially be
removed. The proposed Tree Conservation Plan is attached.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION: June 9, 2016; Approved (3-1) subject to the Staff Report dated June 3, 2016
and subject to the Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 3,
2016
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 3, 2016
N:ICommunity DevelopmentlMEMO12016 Cases1045-ZDP-Matthews CourNStaff ReporhZA 16-045-CC-2016-6-21.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-045 Page 5
Vicinity Map
Matthews Court
saa 620 0 5 670 lav 800
EAST sOUTHLAKE BLVD
001 807 817 821 1035
5 525 636 717 1 751
641 721
B29
771
601
631 803
811 621 D
g+ 90S
635
wx wi ,on
��ckEft RD 841 ZFNA RUCKER RD
731 y
ON
41
N
N
m 225 229 301 305 309 73
N �
224 220 300 304 30a
Y R Q
P
1600 vD4[,"1"1210161020 1024 Q,
^ n V M
1009 1D13 1017 Qo
N
1000 10041008 a
Aro 728 A E 1100
3 v ~ ^ n 1001 1005 1009 013
1101
1000 1004 1 N P
" aYas n
1001 1005
�, o ,g 0
2 s m a13
o
N ZA16-045 & ZA16-046
Zoning Change
r and Development Plan
S
Nik
& Preliminary Plat
0 200 400 800 1,200
. Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-045 Page 1
Plans and Support Information
Proposed Development Plan
DETAIL W(1'-20') DETAIL'B'(i"-2W)
` - - RRU ERR F.. - waTEN EA�TnErr
M1UCHER Ool'. .H Sjtiy_
j '0 5 PREYI ou"y
.. MRROVFO TRTH 20NIYG EPSEVEYT
1 E EAS 2n15
(ONowANCE 80-]017 �w NAEa ENT
1 FOR VATTNEWS COVRT, [ nLITv EAT
z 1 tl a K PWESTWI P_CESS E�E:E
y ' Y - wl,r VHOIE sm sEBEF [ f
wAIER-LIE
aN
T E T-L L
I
UC;-AT C[N MAF' (N.T,S.)
d�
a- -TE LT
ry"N A,Cx EX1311NG T �
' 1 _
l ND9'07'23 E P.Q.
1cTH r L u _ .-.
r.11 A-11-... I• 1 1 N87'34'i]"E 1-0z.19' N9]'31'2- 117.98.
$ENA RIICKER R0A0. - 60 0E.
C u.o o�mcannN
Aananx Nan twF pLswLl/yly:wo, - •`4X•"`� .1
�aT
E
LT
• � ; =
/ : F —T
LL TI - L T
Wq d
m
N
r
- - [
.1 e IT [I..n.L
/J LTII LLE T
I-
- - E.iT. EI E n-L
M 5 -
Soo 501,
1
-aT ,� c
17.
euneav,w atno.b ew. .xe l DEVELOPMENT PLAN s
1 FOR ZAIG-045 ZONING REOUEST
MATTNEWS COURT 'e
SITE-LTi SLMIA=T 'HART LOTS 1-9 AND 9X-10X,BLOCK A',
LOTS IX-3X,BLOM B d
- 8 RESIDEM7IAL LOTS x
Ti I - r TL 4 OPEN SPACE L07S
1 PRIVATE SIREET LOT f
F = -T F I F IT E I E 7-- AND BRING n ate A N u T W TE s
O.W.XNNHT yyRVEv,Q$g CT NIAJP N MS 6
FT- F- _ - F IN OF Sd1T4NtE-ARRANT LWN1T,lE%IS 5
FOUR IEAX5 BE1fLOPNENT.Ll APPLICANT 1
Ec So hj*l Bwlward,Suln I2O-3]] (81-Jg]g-34]4
g
L _,T_ SwMloke.TeK®
'I L L Canla[I:Ten Nolthlh.. o
I
.0-I TIF L CL L T L
F 1T O1N1EiL 9
Atl-Ison.Tema]5001 (8]2-8]1-98]I
' '_ Canted:0tle LIarE
N� �PARTNERS.INC. AUTIIOWED AGENT
un ttA R
Ex15TrvG O WISE j = Atldeen.Tnae]Sd11 (a�212ea-]aTa g
FRANCHISE JBLITE nCI EEE D L-E� HIA .170 C-nfact=9fo
no EWIPNEVT suaEENEu IN FCFURu 1wnE wIIN w�ae F-era TeoL ,oe]eoao p
'1I:IY15 ORCINANCE NO.483 SECTTCN am.P d
AeAnx4tl Wf Y w914 e -
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 1
Proposed Development Plan/Open Space Plan - Close-Up- Proposed Gated Private
Street on Matthews Court
C. NO. D2151'20478 1)6.58
IN87'34 '140.18' - N87'31'24"E 147-96'-
.74' �, __w.- Tiq - - F]f 1;VARlABt€ WIiSTH R(}Wj - - - < o
AA � ..� C� 88'02'23"E 6� 057'7 y�yErL�
4.03' 0.00-- PA STABLES o
m
PUBLIC —
%/ _ STREET
C16 P.A.E. AND
��/OT �OX, A.E. AND �: . �S` I S � ^_ LANDS APE ESMT.
�I / BLOC A L DSCAPE ESMT. ` VARIAB WIDTH /
EN SIACEVA IABLE WIDTH / I I SEE NO E 11
SEE NOTE 11j I 0.0' z0. ' I L9X,
4,105 Sq) N 1 25 M x 0 BIL C PACE
0,324 aofeIft.SEE OPEN SPACE "� U ?A " oo As.°' x±11 12 sq.ft.
PLAN FOR LAYOUT) U1 U r 0,2SI OCr2S (S E OPEN SPACE
N88'48'01"E 1604' w= N FOR LAYOU
10' U.E., P.A, ��' 588'48'01"W 154.09'
d and Landscap
10' SVDE YARD SETB� CK a� U Easement _ _
�0 25 d i �v 0' S1pE YARD SETBACK
I, LOT 1, 1 PA N f T.P.&L. EASEM T
�I / ri CENTERLINE 0 EXISTING 4
I BOCK A p J j p �' ,_-I OVERHEAD P ERLINE <I
r 20,029 sq.ft. c' 0.0 >e ANG / I AND POWER OLES
�� VOL. 2480 PG. 30
0.460 acres r -
I } OT 6
o
Sihr IXaulM[ L1tlElNIRi Mkk� '�
kNINY GAIk
,1-3IN GATE SS GATE�� —17' k -13'GATE �' 13'GATE -1 7'�
75 PAVRIG 18 Mme:. 36'PAVN1 i
-5 Entry Gate
Scde 1/4' = V
FUTURE
ZENA RUCKER ROAD
Fr
,K
OPEN'. YxM—.k
rt c e o nrw .
�r P
sa kmexro-
YlfOur• II, Gc'r GP:G 9idrxceY '
x me
10'kE
I 3 �
I lO�rr W10-
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 2
Previously Approved Development Plan (October 6, 2015)
IEr n
_ Spq
PoWT-OF-WAY �� 1
Ex EABENEnT
DS
EAENENT � II
mn. diMINAfY fASaxExl uy s T
c N __T
SITE
°�! 'I til-I�' acagN 1
i I NANnols sANrrARr senor� ��� &
Amt A MANHa£61ERN m
IYF
tlnvs WATER VALVE
s,oxE� i i II i II�.wM
I. ffi,nwale
LUP.°f�Tc u�iuwcu, Ill . m
L}OCATIOFI
�nxn,Nn LT,e' d+
tN'xX' 1(LINE°Csm 4Kx5
WITCHW51�1 Oe AG)
PAVNO ae ¢ xum, �
\\t, I" we 91tva[oX x
$now IN
an 4 147. 5. .SBr 1
34
61 m�n<x.s wX�
T
OCT,,11pp
—'` ilA�DLC ���mp� eG�m631 n0. xxAN[
Niu9sA 'y �'
363 S.B32!9.t I r`�i a spivun nxwtt sieR
PEc }}�pp22t x 6. Biu
I T��rXt4 ;mx q 7� LOT
1 �� 1 zx3ze.alt. .I
'�w'e sl9p4n,era,lx I' o,sx ocrm / / ��T -
JULY 2 PP
I nn
I sa
r 1`
LOT .A Yt \ 1 ti LOT ,l'ry m 'L
\ • —� TCR
r `I I —
I xe
'r I j l I ° I lilt NEq.M°LIA'TIY RESDWIIaL
.57
TO aA �I
A a�sl
MEFO`slm_�� GIB N
/ r' I
BII,�T x
+l eI .aaX u9G�rypX sout2 nN+x TN 1 \ �
sJOT le9x 1 �``
1� o Nm.2CA a°tn9r�mnuL
r
SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART DEVELOPWNT PLAN
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: FOR ZA15-070 ZONING REQUEST
ANTIMATED START DAIS 4TH QUARTER 2015 Ow''E TABLE
EXISTING ZCMINC. AC NO. DELTA RADIUS HEIIGTN TAMINT CIIXiO 6EARINC ONORD MATTHEMS OCIURT
PROPOSED ZONING: R-PUD
LAND 115E DE5C ATION:MEDIUM DENS,TY RES1: O BX9
71AL CZ AYL NNIaHT el1RLEY,ABSTRACT N
PROPOSED LANG LISP I)ESIONAMON' 3944'18' 150.00' 1-02,29' 5].22' NI T34']1'E 100.32' pTy OF yllllul�,-ANT CDUNTI,Tuns
MECUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL C4 ' , FOUR PEAKS DEVELOPMENT,LLC APPLICANT
GROSS ACREAGE S.B AC2(252.9DI SF) 'lo' U0
LS N' 0.50 ,may s rte Tm-323
hEf ACREAC�: 5.3 AC}(230,393 9R) CB 2aree2� .lo.'r x,25U'oti N N u (214)6T6-3454
AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 27,024 SP! 1596'27' 430.00' 113.83' 57.15' 564'23'24"E 113.30' en a vn me ee
OPEN SPACE AS A PERCENTAGE: 10.668
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS: 8 LOTS LINE TABLE LANULOCK,LLC 1M1 O ER
MININUN LOT SIZE:20,OW SF 18390 AENIeen RnnB (OT21E31-BBT
RESIOENTAL DENSITY:1.5 LOIS/NET AC uLIF ARI'U AZ_Texn 13001
MAX IMPERL10U:COVERAGE PER LOT'. 408 I2 _
Cun}um:Ode aura
L3 JOI PARTNERS,INC ALTNOI AGENT
1931E L4 g ,U', - Aeelvc Tae Um
50t.200 B (B]i7aNs-Te)n
LS s T]" 2t<' CvntwU Jury 811v
EXISTING OVFR HEAD UTILITIES LULL BE RELOCATED ANO ALL NEW LP 501Y1'S9'E 3680' s xa lvnww
FRANCHISE UTLIIIES WILL BE PLACEC UNDERGROUND ANO L7 H T 4' uLr a,mla nL
AROUND EWIPMENT SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WT 41BDIMSION LB N439�'?3'E 2121' uLr xL sora
ONF
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 3
Proposed Tree Conservation Plan
}
Al+ s5Y'J�1 77 "573
4-
-il- FUT�Y�E ZENA BUCKER ROAD
k7�T0+ .a.
+ +3l}+ 1P
+ l2 r
/t\I{ G� + 33 +176 — 3 -
iW +3T7
LOT 8
•,+A E 20,990 SQ FTS
(��15, Me
V 2
+14 1792 —
LOT �+177a +t 1n9 /!
i-20,029 SQ G
+ 31 B3
+ 9 , SF
91.
V.
�1866 1879
+Fa
3
6.9 +l 99
�, ' 1�' LOT 7 +
+1 s LOT 2 + 3(�''� +� 22,01 7 SQ F7 vVa
666 21,561 SQ FT LT-- �I +,�� -
, 7 G)
658 ���t� ,5 ♦1 ,
i 1657 t
0
o iso' i�
+,f }
+, r LOT 3
78+1
22,121 SQ FT LOT 6'� kYM 2 1.422 SQ FT � N
+�7
+k6 9 +1,3
4l 92 7
I �1 1e43 I 9
1 +� 1829 it lB2' 1814
l
+16 (96 -7C IB28
193
I
,1 LOT 4 `•� LOT 5
ITS 23,277 SQ FT 21,868 SQ FT
+,33
PLANTED rN COMMOPF AREA
8C CALPEA INCHCS
TREE SIZES TREES
O TREES LESS THAN 10" O EXISTING PRESERVED TREES �r
O TREES 10" 19" 0 POSSIBLE PRESERVED TREES , Q
EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED
0 TREES 20" 29"
ntEc rnNarr cov[RAr.[ i -\
TOTAL ME MEA 557yB1 SE 4.4 Ks1-, `W 9ti rxa YmKM_
TOTAL ETIST11ti G OPY 100.577 3E 3 AC./1 J$ft _
+ J TREES 30"AND GREATER "Efx'"EDE[fl
cwD►r ^"0"
0�� 14ESIkfPR"EAWW IV ICREENI 1502351{1.B lYE+ti �3µ j L.AL BUFLD�R f7E WIR�� 11i��P,AN
0.�SS40.[nx[_SEIIV/0,�CPNOPE 51'F3AOM7 fASi SF 90.5 K+�-0 1IN
7�Afz sl n.z ACi!-1 3T.7E1 SIAM TREE(z+cwm-O s IEEE )
*N UNOMTORY T;,E 42AEWNW) 7A16-04S
1 MAITHEWS COURT SEE CONSERVATION PLAN
SOLfTHLAK TEXAS
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 4
Tree List
TAG!! EIAal SPECIES T"t VIAMEM 80411..1 SPECIB3 TAG# 04ANUM(Ind*10
1572 7.5 Hearne 1682 6 Cads Elm 1733 17 Ckelor HSOdVny
1576 10 Haam. 1693 8 Ceder Ekn 1797 35 0.1,
1566 7 H.r . - 16 H. .w 1798 6 Hedmmry
1561 71.5 amilw Hedme 7710 16.5 Sw Amedun Elm 1799 65 H.00TREES IN R.O.W.TO BE REMOVED
1561 6.5 Hackbomy 1711 6 H..,*.Club 1866 6 Hadd m TAGS DIAMETER IFcllaa slB
1565 d SPM Gum Bumelie 1712 B Hackberry toot 8 HO,,y 1573 10 Ha
150a aspM vMw 1717 8 Cedar Elm 1602 B.5 CA-t. H.cxberry 1571 e w
1589 135Cl-W Cedar Om 1731 6 H-A.CPA 1601 12 H 1575 20 Cksw vAller.
1591 7 Cedar Ekn 1732 12 Hmkb.my 1007 13 Uleler H.dty 1577 65 Cellar E.
1592 a M- 1749 1 6 Cada I 1000 1 14 ! V41M hh t57a 12 Hecxb.rm
1593 T Aered6.n Elm 1744 6.5 Oak 1807 7 5 SON H
1585 10 ARLWI-Bm 1745 7 Oak Im 63pot N Ott 0 sot w
1397 6 Cotler 7718 76pq Oak 1608 9 Oak
1502 9 salt "nWelN
1811 6 a" 1747 65 SplA Cedar laic aCk.W H.ckbeny 1583 BGuster wdbx
1612 6.5 Duk 1744 7 Cedar 1611 75 HWb-y 1560 90u.br ill
1613 6.5 O.k 1749 7 Ouk 1612 30 5 Spill Wk 1587 1 T it Cede EW
1519 12 Cum 6-1. 1750 0 f k --lot-3 85 I[ H-kbm low 6 Cads Ekn
1521 10.5 Nnerlurt Elm 1751 75 American Elm 1814 8.5 G6at.r H.Nberry 1594 to Spld Amedwn B.
1622 i2 O.X 1752 11 Elm 1a15 7 Cedar 15" 265 Ouabr Ammon Elm
1623 9 Spld Gum&rmelw 1753 1 B A-dwn Elm 1816 9 Spin Hedrber 1586 10 Arnenun Bm
1624 6.5 Hackberry 1754 6 Cotler 1a17 1 6 HAckberry 1586 8.5 pnertnn Elm
1625 13 Oak 1755 75 Elm Iola 6 H..kbeny lam T.5 Hp4.1 Ceder Ehn
1626 8 Harkbarry 1756 7 Oak 1424 6 Cak toot 10 Amertwn Bm
1827 aspit Cedar Ebn1757 65 Oak 1825 150lelar Am-Elm lam 65pr11 Pawn
182a BS U..br Ceder 17T7 6.5 Cedar 1820 9.5 O.k 1803 12 SPIA Amenwn S.
1521 5 AI okep Elm 17T2 13 raoeter H.a .n 1630 39 CkAler Ammon Eft 1604 65 Amenwn Elm
1773 85 M HkmR-W. 1 11 Amedran 1605 6 Arne-6m
1639 7.3 Jyrl.rlpn Elm 1608 14 A-.6m
1631 2/9p91 Oak 1774 12 Hap?erry 1032 85 Elm
1632 6 A-r- 1775 12.5 Ousler Ho".ny 1433 11.5 Elm 1667 65 H.cmerrf
1893 1 7 gmw-
t 1776 655 Y Hadt6. 1831 6-5 Pecan lam 7 N.cNxm7
1634 8 Elm 1777 26 rater H.W.n 1635 1G6 Chxw Hsckbeny 1766 175 spit Elm
1397 6 1770 1. H.mebe Club 1830 10 STAR H.UL 1754 9 CAdar
low a 1779 6 Ckwtar Ha.W. 1897 a 5 Ced., 1780 75 Spat Cad.Ela
1637 7 Elm 1780 6 He be 1839 - Spur Cetl.r 1781 6 Closter Cade.Ekb
1640 23 1781 6 SpM HacX6arry1834 a Ok 1782 7 Cdar
1542 7 1782 75pM Ha b-, 1640 11 Cek 1703 8 Cads1544 165 1763 755pIN Ha.n low 29 Hackbe 1784 It Cx Il Amman Bm
1645 175 1784 6 H.cAbarry 1851 6 Bm 1765 9 Cdar
1641 38 Spill 1785 B HacFberry
1852 7 Elm 1788 9 CNal
166a 12 Ceder Eon 1786 7 Ha b.ny 1033 7 C.", 1T417 85 9 Cedar
Ism 0OWE, C."'FJm t7s41 7 Ceder
1669 8 Ceder Eon 1787 B,5 s arty loss 5 Cedar 1709 6.5 HerA6Mry
1650 6.3569! Cads Elm 1780 a.5 1770 115 w w
1855 105 C4tlu Elm 1790 8.5 1856 fl Spa NnenrJn em
7650 9 Cedar Elm 1791 6 1657 7 Amearen Bm 1789 9 O.k
lose 7 Ceder Bm 1793 115Ckrlw2-7 lase 7.5 Hedd 1792 75 a Cedar Eke
1567 I1 Cedar Elm 1794 1 tar tlack6.w 1059 12.55pi6 Heft ry 1918 75 6 He
16ea to Cedar Elm 1Ba0 14 Ck ler Hackberry low 6 Ha
1669 9 Cads Eon last 65 Hadrb. 1a21 10 Ha
1570 0.5 ON.,Elm 1882 6.5camer MWO 1022 6 Oak
1875 I Cedar Elm 1072 I We.Gob 1623 14 0-13-dia
1676 5
Cedar Own 9.5 Amedr-0r1 Ell1627 14 CkOW
Cehlaclmarry
1� C d.So 1874 7 An-Bm 1828 12 Clwter Hadt5
14175 10 Ckaµer Arno-Elm 1629 65 P...
1870 IQ Spin Al0nl-aw 1847 7SpM Clea,Bm
1877 12 Coder Am.n-8m te42 a oak
1678 7 Haddtany 1643 a Spiff ru
1879 6 H.01,e 184 6 CIWEr Hdoely
100 8 Spa H-cd 1845 9.5 Gunter Ha
1601 10 Heclmer 1648 6 ".Goody
1062 B Hackher 1847 55 spit Hacxbelry
10413 95 d Hackbe 1848 7 Huckbmry
10414 6 HacKWrFy 1849 a Clufer HnaM
1865 11 Hadd-y tool a Spurt w
1860 16.5 INA 9 C-lor w
1881 25 Oak loss 13.5 Ha
lana 7 w
1087 5.5 H.W.ny
IBRO 8 H.
1869 T w
Ism 6.5 w
1971 11 w
TREE LIST
FOR ZA16-045 ZONING REQUEST
MATTHEWS COURT
L079 1-8 ANO 9X-10X.BLOCK A;
LOTS 1X-3X,BLOCK B
8 RESIDENTIAL LOTS
4 OPEN SPACE LOTS
1 PRIVATE STREET LOT
AND BEfNG 5.808 ACRES OUT OF THE
0.9L KNWT SIa78EY,ABSTRACT NUMBER 999
CITY OF SOOTFLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS
FOUR PEAKS DEAMOPMENT,LLC APPLICANT
2500 Ee.t Sauthloka 0-1-d,Su Ra 120r323 (214)675-3434
SBathl4ke.Tele.76092
Con toot:Tom Molthew.
LANDLOCK,LLC OWNER
16390 Acl As Rded (972)931-8971
Addl-,Te-a 75001
Contact U.I.Clerk
JBI PARTNERS,INC. AUTHORIZED AGENT
16301 Quorum Orbe.surto 200 a (972)24a-7876
AM—TOrbe.
75001
Cmtect: Jerry 5316
7BPE Na.C-e]a TBPlS Ne.106]6066
Reerbm9M Bay 21 2016
Sdmrrtlatl 907 2.2016
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 5
Previously Approved Tree Conservation Plan (October 6, 2015)
14
]. 1 .)
FUTiI ZENA RUCKER ROAD _
`J i3 +1 Yr•
G� 11iG1.t
I� y
l ]
r` /�� LOT 8
G4 _ +1 1 21,947 SQ ET
l41 49 +11`:3 _rik
LOT �- t ]Ea ti I E ou na
..23,328 SQ 9°_ a r `,
G)`
+li 7
LOT 7
LOT �.l'a y
22,234 SQ FT
i yas 21,380 SQ FT L.T�
1 80'TYP--� •.
LOT 3 +
-, +1m", {
22,121 SQ FT t_. � LOT 6
It+ltlp 21.422 SO FT
a16 9 1 41'°'J
6�1 Ell
Wil
_max] lE20 �r.'•-
+IE• �/ ,:a 'ti:r.;pct='-t:..�p"
o
LOT 4 LOT 5
�
23,277 SQ FT _ Z 1,868 SQ FT
+n
PLANTED IN QW0 AREA
as cau=�R IE,c+♦Es
TREE SIZES TREES
TREES LESS THAN 10' EXISTING PRESERVED TREES qq V„• Tn.,
POSSIBLE PRESERVED TREES 3 `I
TREES 10"- 19"
EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED
- I TREES 20" 29" �a
TRF.CANOPY C05'Efvlli
-':'FLSIIE.1REi 2SMO:iF IS.tl hL•r- --- --
- 11,11\4-1-1'1 IVV.,fe 11
+ j TREES 30"AND GREATER ME MYID,REEf NO
Fn-F,:CS "-AlC 1GRFF1.7 1%.741 iF 11.0A.I) ".St
MIC61 F.II.SFR:.-OUIRFf TFIF-RAS]
F'VYSIR.E'Nklk.'ffU'RFE V.H' rCRL.N?. tl.219iF 0.2�•/.) A.lf
N1411 II.Y•Itsr.f N.# SNM)E NE!;N CJIFPF.2,m RE'.a 0;
N IAa[RQ3TCYY".NEE J eq•uny
ZA1S 0701
TREE CONSERVATION PLAN MATIFsouWs COER s
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 6
Proposed Open Space Plan
k�l
A
r
Scor t/e'-f m!/ .t 4�.rtvr �'m fMn l thew,four[
r. F
Li b
�1
`'1� •Y•� eaPawr „ -1 .sarE-�Lz..
f_5
FUTURE L
ZENA RUCKER ROAD
� "'� Drat sPArF PiAr+ �
-.` � .,,.,_, QR ,�..— •.—�+ " Fac xARa-Des zartc aEa>tsr
�4' � '•�••�—� y Lon i-e wp a%-tox.eLocx r; t
f
_ �Y[}: t'wr.Ars span Lor
�, Oh P
s69Wl'.t LLC0wa xx6
011A EfrI40E1R0f��lt. PRLgwlr y
(� . s�wm a�re "n.wn.,¢a-azt In Uue-sw IASL
<v-. ••:` 8 PAF1rOK,MC ewMONED MFMT
'••. �g4 NIM x-n
Close-Up View
} 0 �
e-i-��WtE sr W.lE���i 1�. _i}p,frE � ��WIE�-r-•
-.-�nwq 1rw�wr 1 tS Plnlp
r
-'
FUTURE
ZENA RUCKER ROAD
_ _ WEN SPACE PLAw
V `I � ® �r.r a".�rrwt r- FIX2 zAf6-O/S aONNC FEWEST
uArntEws cower
•'✓ -' �3 O '•.�- w•m.-,.��...� �= Lnss t-e,wo ry-+az eLocx„
• 7 1 �J • u-wi..�f .r.r LOn %-3k BLOgI B
IOVLTTE SA lL.
tPFrw+r siacEr Lor
S•' __._ .,� ea ar sonts.Pc xwruxr mwm,tn{s
MR P[w(S OEtEEQ Ef LLL APPUCw
V iwRo�oac.LLc w o.una
• Px�rta wtttoEvmo nmtrwtxoEvmo eadr
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 7
Previously Approved Open Space Plan (October 6, 2015)
J
e vd.: faaae-awLwS wea.
E View From Rucker Road
N.T.S.
g � u..u.:. [euersue-Nrprderej a..L
S � R-Im-un ao- (quercveyargfl�ew) a rteetl !
8
ry v 6
II 0 Iutrnw-merWCUej }
6{
621
618 s
FUTUR 624 62S
ZE RUCKER ROAD
rrr I
I} o o N OT IDI e� b
CK A
0 SPACE sen Bs i L T 9
9 GK A
- SPACE
OPEN SPACE PLAN
r FOR 7AlS-D70 ZONNC REQUEST
rr NArTHENS COURT
�� 0.rA KMOR SIMlYEY./HSTReL�T�M0.eIg
r�� on ff mTwA4 TMRnugT cwniv,lE]n 9
/ 5 ;
� FIXIR PEAKS OESELOPIAENT.LLC hPPl1CANT 8
�� [111fe]e-.N34 4
SmNIWr,ieme ieg�a 8
RetasF Rm KetlAe-
LANgLOGe.LLG OMNER
Addlean,Tame]5001 IFBtjE]1-eBae
Car�tosk gals Ps'F 8
MI PARTNERS,INC. WTICRIZEC`
CENT
.w1 0uvun sone anB a (nzjsaE-mm
Centese Jerry 5>tu
uv M mlae><rve.roo�eaa Y
ama �
Close-Up View
i
i
FUTURE
ZENA RUCKER ROAD
,i; .X` "S Rnmude Vytw Ti1i Brmatle L
EE,
-� V r� 5 Gonad nh Totl Fp r , 8r4.ye a\ y
-r r�,y„ •L'.{•
�j
qB �% )`..1
wal tt
..cimudo L Eel Tree
/ nee
/• �...TLOT f Ox.
-EAatOq Tr.e / - -- BLOCK eermuwl OPEN P CE Ihwo r _ �.wn.g�• ,�� uw. LOT 9X,
.1
emrm ,� i BLOCK A
F r
' ` e.lmgda UDEN SPACE
! r
r
r
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 8
z
s-- _ --- _ FUTURE LENA ROCKER ROAD
a y
LOT 1 f' LOT 8
20,029 SQ FT 20,990 SQ FT
i6OAK
•� '�" ~ :_'� LOT 2 LOT 7 `
21,561 SQ FT
22,417 SQ FT
180,TYP
.L o
rAsdr� • LOT 3 LOT 6 +-6�}•"�,
r r
�, :• 22,121 SQ F 21,422 SQ FT o
J• y.ti
- r
r." +
LOT 4 LOT S
- ,
2 3,2 77 SQ FT 21,868 SQ FT
•''} _-
.i zs-owc
z
a
1 L
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 9
Proposed Development Standards
�t�iTINE Cti 5 C OiRT
DE[EL.OMENT STXN-_AF.DS
Development shall taloe place in accordance with Section 14(SF-20A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT)of the Southlake Zoning Ordinance.as amended.unless as otherwise identified below-
1. Matthews Court shall be developed in general accordance with the Concept Plan-
_'. Private StreetsiRestricted Access:Private streets and restricted access shall be allowed within the
Matthews Court neighborhood. Unless otherwise identified in these development standards and or on
the attached exhibits. Southlak-e's Private Street and Restricted Access standards shall apply.
3. Front Yard:There shall be a front yard of not less than 25',with an additional reduction of up to 25%
(6.5')for tree preservation_ Said determination shall take place at the time of building permit
submittal for the individual home and shall be agreed upon by the City as part of the building permit
approval process.
4. Side Yard:There shall be a side yard of not less than 10'.
5. Rear Yard:There shall be a rear yard of not less than 30'.provided that on lots fronting on a cul-de-
sac,there shall be a rear yard of not less than 25'.
6. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maxinmm lot coverage not
exceeding 400'u of the lot area,except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600
square feet.
Neighborhood Screening: Screening of the neighborhood from Zena Rucker Road shall be
accomplished with a combination of masonry wall and landscaping as shown on the Open Space Plau
and Neighborhood Screening Exhibit.
Six foot(6')tall_om style metalfencina shall be vrovided alone the western limits of the
neighborhood Said fencing%%'ill not however.be allowed within a dedicated drainage easement.
Fight foot(8')tall,board-on-board cedar fencing with a cap running across the top of the boards shall
be provided along the southern and eastern limits of the neighborhood. Metal poles shall be used
with the cedar fencing. Additionally. any fence cross members shall be placed on the inside of the
neighborhood. This perimeter fencing shall be stained a uniform color and shall be of a similar
appearance a,that which was built for the nearby Rtinding Creek neighborhood.
With the exception of the screening along Zena Rucker Road which will be built in conjunction with
the development of the neighborhood.the above referenced screening will be built in conjunction
with the home construction on the affected lot.
NLat=usCocaT = I1 MAY 31_'-
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 10
3. Fencing:Fencing protiided for individual lots and not addressed as part of the neighborhood
screening shall be provided as follows. Eight foot($')tall board-on-board cedar fencing vnth a cap
rxwnmg across the top of the boards shall be provided along the interior side lot lines up to a point no
closer than 20'behind the front building line of the lot. Metal open fencing shall be proxided for anv
fencing generally running parallel to the street.
9. 4Lattheti rs Court shall be designated as a 40-wide.utility.drainage.and emergency access easement
as shown on the Concept Plan. However,the easement for the bulb of the cul-de-sac shall have a 5,?'
radius.while the pa-,ing of the cul-de-sac shall have a fTMnimwn 50.5' radius.
10. The alig=ent of Matthews Court shall be as shown on the Concept Plan.
bL+rlxFws COT XT : A _ I: MaY 31,2016
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 11
Previously Approved Development Standards (October 6, 2015)
MATTITFWS COURT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development shall take place in accordance with Section 14(SF-20A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT)of the Southlake%oning Ordinance,as amended,unless as otherwise identified below.
1_ Matthews Court shall be developed in general accordance with the Concept Plan_
2. Front Yard:There shall be a front yard of not less than 25 ,with an additional reduction of up to 25%
(6.5')for troc preservation. Said determination shall take place at the time of building permit
submittal for the individual home and shall be agreed upon by the City as part of the building peanut
approval process.
3. Side Yard:There shall be a side yard of not less than 10'.
4. Rear Yard:'Iliere shall be a rear yard of not less than 30',provided that on lots fronting on a cul-de-
sac,there shall be a rear yard of not less than 25'.
S_ Maximum l.nt Coverage:All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not
exceeding 40'%of the lot area,except the sum to al of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600
square feet.
6. Neighborhood Screening:Screening of the neighborhood from Zena Rucker Road shall be
accomplished with a combination of masonry wall and landscaping as shown on the Open Space Plan
and Neighborhood Screening Exhibit.
Six foot(6')tall,open style metal fencing shall be provided along the western limits of the
neighborhood.
Eight foot(8')tall,board-on-board cedar fencing with a cap running across the top of the boards shall
be provided along the southern and eastern limits of the neighborhood. Metal poles shall he used
with the cedar fencing. Additionally,any fence cross members shall be placed on the inside of the
neighborhood. This perimeter fencing shall be stained a uniform color and shall be of a similar
appearance as that which was built for the nearby Winding Crock neighborhood.
With the exception of the scrccning along Zena Rucker Road,which will be built in conjunction with
the development of the neighborhood,the above referenced screening will be built in conjunction
with the home construction on the affected lot.
7_ fencing:fencing provided for individual lots and not addressed as part of the neighborhood
screening shall be provided as follows. knight foot(8')tall board-on-board cedar fencing with a cap
running across the top of the boards shall be provided along the interior side lot lines up to a point no
closer than 20'behind the front building line of the lot. Metal open fencing shall he provided for any
fencing generally running parallel to the street.
MA WSCOMT f':e c.i 11 JUL 24,2015
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 12
8. The right-of-way for Matthews Court shall be 40'wide,as shown on the Concept Plan. However,the
right-of-way for the bulb of the cul-de-sac shall have a 55'radius,while the paving of the cul-de-sac
shall have a minimum 50.5'radius.
9. The alignment of Matthews Court shall be as shown on the Concept Plan.
MATmEws COURT P A c e 12 Iuz.24,2615
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 13
Proposed Project Purpose/Intent
. TrHER:S COL-Rr
Matthews Court is a proposed restricted access_ eight lot. single family pocket neighborhood with two
coaunon ereens situated at its front door. These greens establish the first impression most people will
have of the neighborhood as they are visiting residents or just passing by.
A rezoning to the R-PUD district with specific regulations tailored for this neighborhood is being
requested. A plat establishing the development pattern for the neighborhood accompanies the rezoning
request.
The property is located on the south side of the future extension of Zena Rucker Road Its western
boundary is approximately 950 east of Byron Nelson Parkway and its eastern boundary is approximately
1500' west of S-Carroll Avenue_
In conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the neighborhood by the City. Zena
Rucker Road will be extended across those culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the
developer as part of this project. This extension of Zena Rucker Road will bring it closer to its ultimate
connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S. Carroll
Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway.
PURPOSE and LN—MN-T: The purpose of this rezoning request is to adjust the neighborhood plaza prior
to the traffic increasing on Zena Rucker Road to help minimize the traffic's impact on the neighborhood.
A planned development and preliminary plat were approved for Matthews Court in the sunmaer of'015
The requested zoning for the property is the same as what was approved in 2015,with the exception of
the requested restricted access_ (Item #2 in the enclosed Development Standards) The revised plat
assumes the rezoning request will be approved and changes the designation of Matthews Court from a
dedicated right-0f--way to a private access easement with accompanying ancillary easements as needed.
Due to the reconfiguration of the neighborhood's entrance_ the configurations of the adjoining open
spaces have changed. The proposed open space for the neighborhood continues to meet the City's
requirements for open space. Additionally. the reconfigured neighborhood entrance complies with the
City's development standards for a residential subdivision with private streets.
TREE PRESERVATIO-N PLA.\: Ovvr the last 10 to 15 years the property has not been utilized for its
previous residential or agricultural uses_ With the tract being landlocked very little.if any.maintenance
has occurred and the quality and condition of trees on the property has deteriorated greatly.
It is the plan and intent that this development will introduce a quality forestation with the requirement of
each property to plant a significant number of shade trees and umderstory trees: trees that have been
cultivated and bred to grow strong and tall.in the case of the shade trees and full and colorful in the case
of the understory trees. Also. these new trees can also tolerate the use of automatic irrigation systeim
required of each home in Matthews Court.
Widhiza the designated open spaces. the developer will also plant a siccant number of trees as well as
complimenting lower level landscape material and attractive hardscape.
Specifically, every new home will be required to plant 24 caliper inches of shade trees being any
combination of Live Oak. Bun- Oak. Chin Upm Oak- American Elm. Lace Bark Elm. Loblolly Pine.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 14
Additionally, each new house shall be planted with ? understory trees being either Japanese Maple.
Do sw ood Red Bud.
The existing tree cover is approximately 39.8%of the property. Of that.approximately 45%is proposed
to be preserved. Other trees totaling an additional 8.4% may be preserved based on the specific house
footprints. which will increase the percentage to just less than 54% The development standards require
trees with a minimum additional 24 caliper inches to be planted on each home site- At the time of
planting.this will add an additional 471 square feet(approximately)of canopy area to each lot- This will
increase the total potential canopy area to more than 571%initially.
OPEN SPACE I*IA_AGF_VErT and PRIVATE STREET '_%LkrC N.%.NC'E PL.A_\: At the north
end of the proposed development,adjacent to Zena Ruder Road will be two open space lots- On the east
side of Matthews Court is Lot 9X being 11.192 square feet and on the west side is Lot 10X being 14.105
square feet. The open space is 10.090 of the total site. Within the open space the city required Hike and
Bike trail will be constructed to connect with the future trail to the east and the west. Also within the
open space.sidew•alls will be constructed to tie into the sidewalks to be constructed as homes are built on
the east and west sides of Matthews Court.the single cul de sac street within the development. The open
space lots will have a mit of existing and new trees as well as ground cover and turf grass. Overhead
pedestrian portals will be constructed over both the east and west sidewalks leading into the residential
lots and a structure with a small water feature will be constructed on the west side open space creating a
more formal entry into the development. An entry- sign identifying the subdivision may also be
constructed within the open space.
Maintenance of the open space lots and improlmments made upon those lots will be the responsibility of
the.to be created Matthews Court Homeowners Association. It is estimated the anm}a1 maintenance and
operating expense for the open space lots and improvements,will be 514.000 per year. Additionally,it is
estimated the anm 1 maintenance expense for the private street improvements. will be $6.000 per`-ear.
These funds will be generated from mandatory dues paid by the individual property owners at an initial
rate of 5250 per month.or$'.500 per year.
It is understood that any change to the open space plan.following its initial approval by the City Council,
will have to be approved by subsequent City Council action- Within the Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions for Matthews Court. to which all the lots will be subject.a provision will state that: In the
event the party responsible for maintenance of the open space fails to maintain all or any portion in
reasonable order and condition, the City of Southlake may, but is not required to- assume responsibility
for its maintenance and may enter the premises and take corrective actiom including extended
maintenance. The cost of such maintenance may be charged to the Homeowner's Association- or to the
individual propem-owners that male up the Homeowner's Association, and may include administrative
costs and penalties. Such costs shall become a lien on all subdivision properties.
DEVELOPER AGREENJ E-NT ISSUES:
1. Pari:Fees: Prior to presenting the Developer Agreement to the City Council for its approval- the
developer will meet with the City of Southlal:e Pari Board and ask that the part-flees normally due for
this project be waited in trade for the developer malting certain bridge enhancements and extending
the Hike and Bike trail across the creeL- to the west from the Matthews Court neighborhood. tying
into the existing trail- With the development of the creek crossing_ we propose making bridge
enhancements of railing and columns anchored by an oversized column on the southwest corner of
the bridge. generally in compliance with the City designed wayfarer signage found elsewhere in
Soud&k-e. The cost of the enhancements and hike and bike trail extension will exceed the 524.000 of
park fees normally charged for the proposed project.
NiATTTIE 'S Cc
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 15
?. RoadBridge Improvements and Road Impact Fees: The City of Southlake. through its approved
Capital Improvement Plan, has agreed to install the culverts, headwalls and make the necessary
grading for the extension of Zena Rucker Road across the creek where the road currently terminates
east of Byron Nelson Park-way. As Zena Rucker Road is identified on the City's Nfaster
Thoroughfare Plan as a future collector street. and as a past of our development.we agree to dedicate
a disproportionate amount of the right of way and construct a disproportionate amount of Zena
Rucker Road. subject to reimbursements, based on proportionality. In order for the extension to
function properly because of the atypical sight-of-way. the developer has worked with the City staff
on a specific paving design which meets the needs of the City_ yet can be built .xtthLu the proposed
right-of-way.
MATTHEA 5 COLRT
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 16
Previously Approved Proiect Intent and Purpose (October 6, 2015)
MATTIIEWS COURT
Matthews Court is a proposed eight lot,single family pocket neighborhood with two common greens
situated at its front door. These greens establish the first impression most people will have of the
neighborhood as they are visiting residents or just passing by.
A retuning to the R-PIJD district with specific regulations tailored for this neighborhood is being
requested. A plat establishing the development pattern for the neighborhood accompanies the rezoning
request.
The property is located on the south side of the future extension of Zcna Rucker Road. Its western
boundary is approximately 950'east of Byron Nelson Parkway and its eastern boundary is approximately
1500'west of S.Carroll Avenue_
In conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the neighborhood by the City,Zena
Rucker Road will be extended across those culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the
developer. This extension of Z.ena Rucker Road will bring it closer to its ultimate connection at Tower
Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S_ Carroll Avenue and Byron
Nelson Parkway.
PURPOSE and INTENT. The purpose and intent for this zoning change is to allow for a single family
residential development which is being further done in compliance with the City's Master hand IJse Plan.
R-PUD zoning is being utilizod to create greater flexibility in designing single story homes,a trend and
desire of the current market place. Also,by having reduced setbacks, greater flexibility will be given to
builders and architects in positioning the houses and will bring the houses closer to the street,creating a
more intimate and neighborly environment. Also, the greater flexibility in positioning the houses will
allow and encourage the saving of any significant trees that might,chthcawise,be lost.
Development shall take place in accordance with Section 14 of the City of Soutblake Zoning Ordinance
(SF-20A, Single family Residential District), as amended, unless otherwise noted with the rezoning
application.
TREE PRESF'RVATION PLAN- Over the last 10 to 15 years the property has not been utilized for its
previous residential or agricultural uses. With the tract being landlocked,very little,if any,maintenance
has occurred and the quality and condition of trees on the property has deteriorated greatly.
It is the plan and intent that this development will introduce a quality forestation with the requirement of
each property to plant a significant number of shade trees and understory trees; trees that have been
cultivated and bred to grow strong and tall,in the case of the shade trees and full and colorful in the case
of the understory trees. Also,these new trees can also tolerate tlhe use of automatic irrigation systems
required.of each home in Matthews Court.
Within the designated open spaces,the developer will also plant a significant number of trees as well as
complimenting lower level landscape material and attractive hards cape.
Specifically, every new home will be rcquircd to plant 24 caliper inches of shade trees being any
combination of Live Oak, Burr Oak, Chinkapin Oak-, American Elm, Lace Bark EK Loblolly Pine.
Additionally, each new house shall be planted with 2 understory trees being either Japanese Maplc,
Dogwood,Red Bud.
MATmEws COURT
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 17
Of the existing 728 trees,there arc 168 trees not in the right of way. Of this number,84 will be permitted
to be removed with this development, either by the developer or the builder. Of those that arc to be
removed,77 arc Hackberry,Hercules Club or similar type tree.
OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN: At the north end of the proposed development, adjacent to
Zena Rucker Road will be two open space lots. On the east side of Matthews Court is Lot 9X being
11,192 square feet and on the west side is Lot 10X being 15,832 square feet. The open space is 10.3%of
the total site. Within the open space the city required Hike and Bike trail will be constructed to connect
with the future trail to the cast and the west Also within the open space,sidewalks will be constructed to
tie into the sidewalks to be constructed as homes arc built on the cast and west sides of Matthews Court,
the single cul de sac street within the development. '17ic open space lots will have a mix of existing and
new trees as well as ground cover and turf grass. Overhead pedestrian portals will be constructed over
both the cast and west sidewalks leading into the residential lots and a structure with a small water feature
will be constructed on the west side open space creating a more formal entry into the development. An
entry sign identifying The subdivision may also he constructed within the(pen space.
Maintenance of the open space lots and improvements made upon those lots will be the responsibility of
the,to be created,Matthews Court Homeowners Association. It is estimated the annual maintenance and
operating expense for the open space lots and improvements,will be$16,000 per year. These funds will
be generated from mandatory dues paid by the individual property owners at an initial rate of 5250 per
month,or 52,000 per year.
It is understood that any change to the(pen space plan,following its initial approval by the City Council,
will have to be approved by subsequent City Council action. Within the Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions for Matthews Court,to which all the lots will be subject,a provision will state that: `in the
event the party responsible for maintenance of the open space fails to maintain all or any portion in
reasonable order and condition,the City of Southlake may,but is not required to, assume responsibility
for its maintenance and may enter the premises and take corrective action, including extended
maintenance. The cost of such maintenance may he charged to the Homeowner's Association,or to the
individual property owners that make up the Homeowner's Association,and may include administrative
costs and penalties. Such costs shall become alien on all subdivision properties.
DEVELOPER AGREEMENT ISSUES:
1. Park Terms: Prior to presenting the Developer Agreement to the City Council for its approval, the
developer will meet with the City of Southlake Park Board and ask that the park fees normally due for
this project be waived in trade for the developer making certain bridge enhancements and extending
the Hike and Bike trail across the creek,to the west from the Matthews Court neighborhood, tying
into the existing trail. With the development of the creek crossing, we propose making bridge
enhancements of railing and columns anchored by an oversized column on the southwest comer of
the bridge, generally in compliance with the City designed wayfarer signage found elsewhere in
Southlake. The cost of the enhancements and hike and bike trail extension will exceed the$24,000 of
park lees normally charged for the proposed project.
2. Road/Bridge Improvements and Road Impact Tees: The City of Southlake,through its approved
Capital Improvement Plan, has agreed to install the culverts, headwalls and make the necessary
grading for the extension of Tena Rucker Road across the creek where the road currently terminates
east of Byron Nelson Parkway. As 7.ena Rucker Road is identified on the City's Master
Thoroughfare Plan as a future collector street,and as a part of our development,we agree to dedicate
a disproportionate amount of the right of way and construct a disproportionate amount of Lena
Rucker Road,subject to reimbursements based on proportionality.
MA i I H WS COURT
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 18
Proposed Screeninq and Fencin_g Exhibit
5w1+=-
- .ZENA 7,uCKER ROAD—
y—
,
OAD- -
I. y�
PUBLIC - -
51REkd ✓
V
Rf'=9LlL ,—
L CL
:32e
w+roll unvn,r. / .i
ID I
f r la pn!
f I. LD7 I.
f I HLD:K A
E 20.D29wea ;I
0.6o a l
1 1 i
anf�• �.-.1i ' lo•.� Arl;�rr;acx _-
IB tT r I-<.k Lx. 1.
1-..5 F 3I ail
,1 2',561 37.1(. r I -� `I 't 9LOCK A �I Z
22017 su,l.. wI
_-
r
V
Y;am g7eAc E I-_ IL'5j YAKS sIOAr,K — k 'Mo
1
4 la
ID
FN
f �AOIK�A
rc
c. r 32 c_ i ." .•i
IaYA4�Sk�. C[ a IJ
-
,f _ i 1yyyy�
;�1 a�.€ s I < 134�Lh1
ak�C�I x f.A Dk-Dr„ A .I u�er�iJ
LEGEND
6OPEN METAL FENCING
8(BOARD ON BOARD W/CAP
CEDAR FENCING
MASONRY WALL
PER OPEN SPACE DESIGN
"FENCING SHOWN WILL NOT BE ALLOWED
WITHIN A DEDICATED DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
ZA 16-045
N SCREENING AND
FENCING EXHIBIT
M ATTH EW S COURT SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-045 Page 19
JUSOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
SPIN Item Number: SPIN2015-23
Project Name: Matthews Court
SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN#9
Meeting Date: June 23,2015
Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street,Southlake,TX
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance: 2
Host: Bobbie Heller, Community Engagement Committee
Applicant(s)Presenting: Tom Matthews
City Staff Present: Jerod Potts, Planner I; Dennis Killo ugh, Deputy Director of
Planning and Development Services; Mike White, Chief Building
Inspector
City Staff Contact: Dennis Killough, Deputy Director of Planning and Development
Services(817)748-8072
• Attached to the end of this report are the Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the
6/23f2015 SPIN Town Haft Forum
Town Hall Forums can be vievaed in their entirety by visiting htto:llwvw..citvofsouthIake.corn and clicking on"Learn Mare"
under Video On Demand;forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date.
FORUM SUMMARY
Property Situation:
Near Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Rd.
Development Details:
• Generally the project is south of Southlake Blvd., in between Byron Nelson Pkwy.to the
west and Carroll Ave.to the east on the south side of the future Zena Rucker Rd.
• Presenter noted that in cooperation with the City, the culverts are going to be put in
crossing this creek that will allow the road to put it for this project and there will only
remain a small section for the completion of Zena Rucker Rd.
• The existing zoning on the property is Agricultural
• Presenter mentioned the future land use plan for this area is medium density residential
• Application for zoning is for a PUD
• Presenter noted the project is 8 lots on 5.3 acres all of the lots are over 20,000 square
feet
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-045 Page 1
o Could have zoned SF-20 but wanted to do things that would enhance the lots
such as reducing setbacks to create a more intimate feel
o Reducing the setbacks on the front, rear, and side yard would encourage and
allow single story homes to be built
• Presenter mentioned the project has incorporated green space to the north which
includes a walking trail that would tie into the trail on the north side of the Winding Creek
development
• Presenter mentioned that on the east side of the property, the plan is to reduce the
setbacks in order to incorporate existing trees into the project to preserve them
• Presenter noted that at the entrance to the subdivision the pathway contains a raised
arbor on either side of the entrance; also there will be patterned concrete or paved stone
at the entrance
Details of the PUD are noted in the slides below
Presented at SPIN:
MATTHEWS COURT
SPIN MEETING
JUNE 23., 2015
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-045 Page 2
N
E
Fill
r,r
HLAKE BI
Ilk
ilk
ZENA RU
COURT
•
a
*wa"'
4sads2 0 - 1
c❑ n - 80;544 SP�2 :480431
48Q 542B,
490-595) Cl 480-21s 5
� r ■.� w'w.■ f.e w r r : w � � � w � r w r � �� 7
A' �SrP2M€GP.1" ■
Z�iyy�J<480353A�$0- ■'■� cP-44808
-32 01 01 SP1 ■ �"f y "'"�"t�yy�R�a
i N1
-_ 4$0-5498 46C643B■- SP2'` 6 ✓iiap, G
480535 CS a
480-464A ■ 480 454
_ q - c80Q-iTi'1
'44 -5 *.:. Q
■ SF20B N
�����"[ �' `l c � PUD#30 ■
----
,SF1-A
1 4 Px }
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-045 Page 3
`S�u[ Blvd 1-J_-t- _ __ :3tyIC
Al
s; Retail
w .
I -
r
71 NA li I1C KI R Rhl
77rJ ,� Ir
i {
l4ledium Density
�� Res'sder�tial "`
r E
_ Y
m
' �`' '�` MATTHEWS COURT
ACRE5:5.3(NET R.O.W.]
'1 - •� HOMES:S
tel. 23,3v SO T
I W SQ
DfNSiTY: 1.5 HOMES/NET AC
I '�_,-•§. SOUTFiLAKE COMPREFfEN51VE PLAN:
MEDIUM DENSITY RE5EDENTEAL
(>1 HOME�ACRE�
r
191 sq n 11,11110 Fl
22A83 SO rT
Case
c.
OPEN SPACE:D.6 AC(10.3%}
•
. Attachment D
ZAl 6-045 ' . • -
_ _ a
.;. ~ FUTURE ZFNA RUCKER ROAD -
cz
G
LOT$
D
E
Development shall take place in accordance with Section 14(SF-2OA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL E
DISTRICT)ofthe Southlake Zoning Ordinance,as amended,unless as otherwise identified below.
I. Matthews Court shall be developed in general accordance with the Concept Plan. Q
R
2, Front Yard:There shall be a front yard of not less than 25',with an additional reduction of up to 25% M
(6.5')for tree preservation. E
3. Side Yard:There shall be a side yard of not less than 10'. N
T
4, Rear Yard:There shall be a rear yard of not less than 30',provided that on lots fronting on a cul-de-
sac,there shall he a rear yard of not less than 25'. S
T
5. Maximum Lot Coverage:All buildings or structures shall have a maximum Jot coverage not A
exceeding 4O%of the lot area,except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600
square feet. For purposes ofthis section,an unenclosed arborigazebo,which is not structuralh N
integrated into the primary building on the lot,shall not count towards the maximum lot coverage. D
A
6. The right-of--way for Matthews Court shall be 40'wide,us shown on the Concept Plan. However,the R
right-of-way for the bulb of the cul-de-sac shall have a 50'radius,while the paving of the cul-de-sac D
shall have a minimum 40'radius.
S
7. The alignment of Matthews Court shall be as shown on the Concept Plan,
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-045 Page 5
�. ,HTurt[2CNARl1CREuxoco :,�
- c
LOT, LOT8
23,327 SO 2f,9i>5O LT E
P
T
l072 LOT
z1.380 SQ FT 22,234 SQR P
L
� � A
LOT 3 LOT a N
xx,tis3 SQ Fr zi,sza s4 Fr �;t
LOT 9 LOT 5
33,42?SO Ff 22A63 SQ FT
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-045 Page 6
QUESTIONS 1 CONCERNS:
• The land to the west is a waterway; so that's always going to be green?
Area is owned by the school district and some portions are owned by Timarron
as open space
• How do you propose to fence between the yards and along the back line, especially on
the eastern side?
The eastern side will be solid wooden fence — there well be wood fencing
between the lots side-to-side. The fronts will have open style fencing, wrought
iron fencing.
• What size of home are you expecting to go onto these lots by square footage?You said
you are going to PUD;explain what you get by going PUD?
The reason for doing PUD as opposed to SF-20, is it gives more flexibility on
positioning and designing the house — many of these SF-20 lots, everybody has
to go up. PUD allows the project to bring the houses forward. It also allows
people the possibility of designing a single-story house. An advantage is that a
PUD gives the City a right to say yes or no. We expect houses to be 3,500
square feet on up. Hesitant to dictate the house size. Probably will put a
minimum on them.
• Do you know if Zena Rucker has plans for the remaining €and that is hers?
No—except for the commercial land.
SPIN Meeting Rep orfs are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives.The report is neither verbatim na official
meeting minu las;rather it serves to inform al acted and appointed officials,City staff,and tha pu blit of t h a issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. interested parties are
stion gly one ou ra gad to follaw tha ca se throu gh tha Planning and Zoning Can mission and final action by City Cound1.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-045 Page 7
Blackboard connect
This message has been sent! Here is a summary of the delivery results. Click here to view
more information online.
Delivery Summary
Title SPIN Town Hall Forum for 6/23/2015
Message Type Outreach
Site CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
Scheduled By PILAR SCHANK
Send Time 06117/2015 05:30 PM (CT)
Voice Completed 06/17/2015 06:13 PM (CT)
Text Completed 06/17/2015 05:32 PM (CT)
Email Completed 06/17/2015 05:30 PM (CT)
Selected Contacts 10764
Successfully reached 7538(70%)
Languages English*
Device Derlvarles
69%(7307) 10575
t4
96%(155) 161
97%(544)
559
Detailed Delivery Results
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-045 Page 8
Voice(listen)
Good Afternoon this is Pilar Schank with the City of Southlake.A SPIN town hall forum will
take place next Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 6pm concerning the following items. 1.
SPIN2015-21: SPIN#9 will discuss the rezoning and re-plating of 13.8+acres into 3
residential lots at 911 &859 S.White Chapel Blvd. 2. SPIN2015-23: SPIN#9 will discuss
the residential development of 8 lots on 5.8 acres of land near Carroll Avenue and Zena
Rucker Road. 3. SPIN2015-22: The City of Southlake will discuss revisions to zoning
ordinance 480, subdivision 483, and sign ordinance 704-G.Again, a SPIN Town Hall Forum
will be held June 23, 2015 at 6pm in the Town Hall Council Chamber. For more information
go to City of Southlake.com Thank you for your attention. Have a great day.
Successful Deliveries 69% (7307)
Live Delivery 2767
Answering Machine 4540
Unsuccessful Deliveries 31% (3268)
Hangup 48
Fax/Modem 333
Opted-Out 19
Undeliverable 617
Busy 55
No Answer 1824
Phone Network Busy 3
Bad Phone Number 372
Email
A SPIN town hall forum will take place next Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 6pm concerning the
following items. 1. SPIN2015-21: SPIN#9 will discuss the rezoning and re-plating of 13.8+
acres into 3 residential lots at 911 &859 S.White Chapel Blvd. 2. SPIN2015-23: SPIN#9
will discuss the residential development of 8 lots on 5.8 acres of land near Carroll Avenue
and Zena Rucker Road. 3. SPIN2015-22: The City of Southlake will discuss revisions to
zoning ordinance 480, subdivision 483, an...
Email Sent 97% (544)
Email Opted-Out 3% (15)
SMS
A SPIN town hall forum will take place next Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 6pm in the City
Council Chamber. More information:
Text Email Sent 96% (155)
Text Not Sent 2% (4)
Text Opted-Out 1% (1)
Invalid Text Phone 1% (1)
For support, please call (866)360-2155 or email connects upport(Mblackboard.com
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-045 Page 9
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA16-045 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 6/3/16
Project Name: Zoning Change and Development Plan — Matthews Court
APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, LLC OWNER: Landlock LLC, c/o Warren Clark
Development
Tom Matthews Dale Clark
2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120-323 16390 Addison Rd.
Southlake, Texas, 76092 Addison, Texas, 75001
Phone: 214-676-3434 Phone: 972-931-8971
Fax: 817-481-4074 Fax: 972-931-8975
Email: tmatthews@fourpeaksdev.com Email: do@wcdevelopment.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/23/16 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT JEROD POTTS AT(817)748-8195.
Planning Review
Jerod Potts
Planner I
Phone: (817) 748-8195
Email: jpottsa-ci.southlake.tx.us
1. Regarding the written narrative:
a. Describe the use, operation, phasing, infrastructure to be provided, etc. Note, this
development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of offsite R.O.W. and
construction of a portion of Zena Rucker Rd. Clarify this in the narrative.
b. Change all references from "concept plan" within the narrative, development regulations
and anywhere else to "development plan."
C. In terms of that phasing, the development plan states that anticipated start date for this
project is 4t" Quarter 2015. Please correct the phasing on the development plan, and in the
narrative if necessary.
2. The open space management plan as submitted does not address the following requirement
within Section 33.20, Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Update the open space plan to address
the requirement within this section.
33.20 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLANS—For all development proposing any private or
public open space, an open space management plan is required that:
5. Provides for enforcement of the plan;
3. Where a private street is requested, Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, requires the
following:
Comment 3 and comments 4 and 5 that follow all specifically reference Subdivision Ordinance No.
483, as amended, Section 5.05 Private Street Standards in Residential Subdivisions. Below,
please note the following items regarding maintenance, easements and access restrictions.
(Sections 5.05 A, B, C, D, E, and F):
A. Maintenance Cost:A homeowner's association is responsible for the cost of maintenance of
private streets. The City shall have no responsibility for and shall not pay for any portion of the
cost of maintaining a private street.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-045 Page 1
B. City Services: The City has no obligation to maintain private streets. Depending on the
characteristics of the proposed private street subdivision, the City may not provide certain
other services. Among the services which may not be provided are routine police patrols,
enforcement of traffic and parking ordinances, and preparation of accident reports.
C. Maintenance Standards: Maintenance, amenities, and landscaping of private streets shall
conform to the same standards regulating the maintenance, amenities, and landscaping of
public streets. 5-11
D. Retention of Easements:A utility, drainage, and emergency access easement shall be
retained in private streets by the City and other utility companies: 1. providing unrestricted use
of the property for utilities and their maintenance; 2. extending easement rights to all utility
providers including telecable companies operating within the City; 3. providing the City with the
right of access for any purpose related to the exercise of a governmental service or function,
including but not limited to fire and police protection, inspection and code enforcement; and 4.
permitting the City to remove any vehicle or obstacle within the private street lot that impairs
emergency access.
Proposed Matthews Court will be a private access, emergency access, drainage and
utility easement. The lot needs to be dedicated to and maintained by the homeowner's
association.
E. City Assumption of Maintenance: The City shall be the sole judge of whether repairs to a
private street are needed. If a homeowner's association, its successors or assigns, fail or
refuse to adequately maintain private streets and related appurtenances, the City shall have
the right, but not the obligation, to assume temporarily the duty of performing the association's
maintenance obligations at any time after the expiration of sixty(60) days after receipt by the
association, its successors or assigns of written notice from the city specifying the nature and
extent of the failure to maintain.
1. Upon assuming such maintenance obligations, the City shall have the right to collect, when
they become due, the assessments levied by the homeowner's association for the
purposes of repairing and maintaining the private streets and related appurtenances, and if
necessary, the City shall have the right to enforce the payment of delinquent assessments
in the manner set forth in the association's documents.
2. The City shall also have the right to levy an assessment upon each lot on a pro rata basis
for the cost of such maintenance, which assessment shall constitute an assessment lien
upon the lot against which each assessment is made.
3. Under no circumstances, shall the City be liable to the association or any lot owner or their
respective heirs, successors or assigns for negligent acts or omissions relating in any
manner to maintaining, improving and preserving the private streets and related
appurtenances.
F. Access Restrictions: The entrances to all private streets shall be marked with a sign stating
that it is a private street. Either a guard house or an access control device such as a gate or
cross arm shall be constructed at each entrance. All restricted access entrances shall be
manned 24 hours every day, or an alternative means shall be provided of ensuring access to
the subdivision by the City and other utility service providers with appropriate identification. If
the association fails to maintain reliable access as required
4. Please note the following Restricted Access Entrance Design Standards from the Subdivision
Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.05.G:
G. Restricted Access Entrance Design Standards: Private streets which have access controlled
by a gate, cross arm, or other access control device shall conform to the following
requirements:
1. The street must have a minimum uninterrupted pavement width of 24 feet at the location of
the access control device.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-045 Page 2
2. If an overhead barrier is used, it shall have a minimum height above the road surface as
required by the Fire Code for fire lanes.
3. The design of all gates, cross arms and access control devices, including automatic
opening systems and manual backup systems, shall be approved by the Fire Department
before installation.
4. The gates, cross arms, and access control devices shall be tested and accepted by the
Fire Department before being put into operation.
5. Gate designs may incorporate one or two gate sections to meet the required minimum
width of 24 feet.
6. If the entrance incorporates a median, guard shack, or similar structure that necessitates a
divided gate arrangement, the gate and street pavement widths may be reduced if
approved by the Fire Department. This approval shall be contingent upon the subdivision
with private streets having a second approved means of access, but in no case shall any
single gate or street pavement have a clear opening of less than 15 feet.
5. Regarding the private gate to the subdivision, note the following design standards items from
Subdivision Ordinance (Sections 5.05 H, I, and J):
H. Visitor Entrance Design Standards:At least one entrance to a subdivision with private streets
shall be equipped for visitor access. In addition to the above Restricted Access Entrance
Design Standards, the visitor entrance shall be equipped with a call or code box located at
least 50 feet from the boundary of the subdivision to provide for visitors calling in an
automobile queuing. A turn-around space with a minimum outside radius of 30 feet shall be
located between any call or code box and the access control device to allow vehicles denied
access to safely exit onto public streets in a "head out"position. A sign shall be erected next to
the edge of such turn around space to prohibit vehicle parking in such space. A residents
entrance used in combination with a visitor entrance shall comply with the requirements of this
paragraph.
1. Resident Only Entrance Design Standards: In addition to the above Restricted Access
Entrance Design Standards, an access control device that requires residents to use a key,
card, or code to gain access shall setback internally a minimum of 50 feet from the boundary
of the subdivision to provide for automobile queuing; except, that resident entrances equipped
with an electronic opener that allows residents to remotely open the 5-13 access control
device and enter the subdivision without having to stop are exempted from this requirement. A
sign shall be erected next to any resident entrance that does not meet the 50 foot setback
requirement of this paragraph and does not provide a turn-around space with a minimum
outside radius of 30 feet to indicate that it is for resident use only and not for visitors.
J. Cost of Design Standards: The homeowner's association shall pay the cost of complying with
required design standards.
6. Existing overhead utilities need to be relocated. All new franchise utilities must be placed
underground and ground equipment screened in accordance with Subdivision Ordinance No. 483
Section 8.05. Applicant has included note on Development Plan.
7. Note Public Works Engineering comments below regarding fencing along the west property line.
No fences can be built within the flood plain. The screening and fencing exhibit includes a note to
this effect, but the exhibit itself shows fencing that appears to encroach into the flood plain. Please
consider revising this plan to show fencing meeting this requirement.
The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may benefit
and does not represent a requirement.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-045 Page 3
• Staff recommends providing a materials sample board.
• All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations.
Building Inspections Review
Susan Hernandez
Deputy Building Official
Phone: (817) 748-8238
Fax: (817) 748-8241
E-mail: shernandez@ci.southlake.tx.us
Separate permit required for open space features-tower, shade structure,water feature, stone wall,
etc.
Demolition permit required for removal of barn/stable.
Contact Christi Upton for notification of removal of existing water well.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Alex Ayala, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8274
Fax: (817) 748-8077
E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. A Developer Agreement shall be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
3. Label distance between median Lot 2X, Block B and the edge of pavement of Lots 1 and 8. Distance
shall be sufficient width and approved by the Fire Marshal.
4. Proposed private streets must be constructed to conform to City street standards.
Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in
the City of Southlake website:
http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
EASEMENTS:
1. Limits of 100- year floodplain shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage easement.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-045 Page 4
2. Fences will not be allowed within dedicated drainage easements along the western property line of
Lots 1, 2 and 3.
Water, sanitary sewer and storm drain lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement
or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be
constructed to City standards.
WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS:
1 . Extend 8" Sanitary Sewer to east side of right of way along Zena Rucker Road. Ordinance No. 440.
2. Proposed 8" sanitary sewer shall be located in parkway- not under pavement, except for crossings.
3. Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary sewer system built to City standards.
4. Extend 8" Waterline to southern property line along dedicated 15' utility easement.
5. All water line stubs must have 2 joints past the valve with a 2" blow-off per the City's details.
6. Water and sanitary sewer lines in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
Minimum size for water and sanitary sewer lines is 8".
Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way.
The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed
before the meter on the public side. A 1" inch meter must have a 1" tap, etc.
Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to
approval of construction plans.
Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards.
The proposed flume will not be allowed.
Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure#23 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning
construction ($309.83/Acre).
Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and
meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the
Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The
plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist,standard details and general notes
which are located on the City's website:
http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must
include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-045 Page 5
reviews Part 111, Section F, (1) (g), Maps.The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution
(especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project
manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during
mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction,and one map
showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include
timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be
submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
* NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department(817)748-8082
to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
Fax: (817) 481-5713
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
* Most of the existing trees on the site are pioneering tree species that have grown on the site in the
past 5 to 10 years.They consist of Hackberry, Cedar Elm, and American Elm which are multi-trunked
or in clusters that sprouted after being brush hogged and then left to grow.
The most prominent quality trees are along the west property boundary of the property where they are
proposed to be preserved. The Developer has also chosen the most prominent quality trees in the
interior of the property to preserve.
* The proposed zoning for the development is Residential Planned Unit Development, R-PUD and is
subject to City Council Approval of the Tree Conservation Plan as presented.The existing tree cover
is approximately 39.8% and under straight zoning a minimum of 60% of the existing tree cove would
be required to be preserved.The applicant is proposing to preserve 45.4%of the existing trees cover
and another 8.4% may possibly preserve depending on the individual lot grading.A possible 53.7%of
existing tree cover could be preserved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously
received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the
first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be
preserved under this section.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-045 Page 6
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% -20% 70%
20.1 —40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
160.1% - 80% 40%
180.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public
rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district,the City Council shall consider the application for
a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as
established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve
the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to
maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental
Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas
from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any,adjoining a natural or man-made drainage
creek;
V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets
as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-045 Page 7
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
Fax: (817) 748-8181
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The gated entry, if approved, must be equipped with an Opticom or KS-2 switch for opening the gate
electronically, as well as a means for manual opening.
Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus (A minimum of 85,000 lbs GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to
back of curb. (Standard street width) (Plans do not indicate appropriate street widths along all areas that
parallel residential lots)
Community Service/Parks Department Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
Phone: (817) 748-8607
Fax: (817) 748-8027
Email: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee
credits and/or acceptance of land dedication. Please contact the Community Services Department at(817)
748-8607 for further details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one(1)acre of park
land for every forty (40) dwelling units.
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the
amount of$3000 per dwelling unit x 8 dwelling units= $24,000.00 .
Pathway Comments:
Review termination of east pathway along Zena Rucker. Should terminate in R.O.W so that adjacent property
can connect.
Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian
access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide
4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and
Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements.
Informational Comments:
Regarding the Site Data Summary Chart - consider a separate chart for the proposed R-PUD
district regulations
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-045 Page 8
Ensure that all easements on or adjacent to the site, if any, are shown, labeled and dimensioned
with the type and record instrument number. Show any critical easements, drainage, and/or flood
plains.
The applicant is proposing to build the private street as part of the PUD regulations. Per Section
5.04 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended:
Private streets are not permitted in new subdivisions in which less than 75% of the lots contain
homeowner occupied structures. An existing subdivision zoned for residential use may be
converted to a subdivision with private streets in place of public streets in compliance with this
section. For purposes of this section, "existing subdivision"means a platted subdivision in which
75% or more of the lots contain homeowner occupied structures.
Zena Rucker Road is designated as a 2-lane collector (C2U) with a minimum 60' R.O.W. required.
A minimum radius of 400' and minimum tangent length of 50' between curves is required per
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483.
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Park Fees and Road/Bridge Improvements credits or reimbursements are matters subject to
approval of a Developer's Agreement by City Council.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21,
Building Color Standards for Non-Residential Buildings.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-045 Page 9
Surrounding Property Owners
F�*NwxF kw yin gr
3f
W
7
ir-71
Zoning Physical
- _ d
-� Fc
e' d
F
� r
@ F
a r
Address Acreage Response
1 BILLY WAYNE & CAROLYN JEAN AG NR
HAY 807 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.94908994
2• CARROLL, ISD RPUD 301 BYRON NELSON PKWY 15.83000000 NR
3 DEVANE CLARKE PARTNERSHIP SP2 NR
LTD 731 ZENA RUCKER RD 2.30043760
4 HCP CRS2 LTACH-BAYLOR SP1 NR
SOUTHLAK 731 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 4.52200976
5• LANDLOCK LLC AG 851 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.87809348 NR
6• LANDLOCK LLC AG 835 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.52472038 NR
7• NOORNEEL LLC SP1 751 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.88132447 F
8. RUCKER, ZENA SULLIVAN SP2 805 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.92941067 NR
9• RUCKER, ZENA SULLIVAN SP2 803 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.72128280 NR
10. RUCKER, ZENA SULLIVAN TR AG 841 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 4.36715365 NR
11. RUCKER, ZENA SULLIVAN TR AG 650 S CARROLL AVE 50.44504566 NR
12• Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR
13. Superintendent of Grapevine NR
Colleyville ISD
14. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR
15. Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR
16. TIMARRON OWNERS ASSN INC RPUD 700 GREYMOOR PL 5.78300000 NR
17. WEATHERFORD LOAN COMPANY SP1 835 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.68925228 NR
18. ZELDA PARTNERS LTD AG 811 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 6.80220864 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Responses Received: In Favor: (1) Opposed To: (0) Undecided: (0) No Response: (17)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-045 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Mey'2515 rZ:W tvoome& 81/4lbA009 p.1
Notification Response Form
ZA 16-045
Meeting Date: June 9, 7016 at 6:30 PM
NOORNEEL LLC
704 GATESHEAD CT
SOUTHLAKE, TX 76M
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING,
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor off apposed to undecided about
J
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above
Space for comments regarding your position_
(��.. A eAW -L-eH-u l&kpr Q ��k,I us So��IaKe
Signature: _ � � -�`, Date.-
Additional
ate:Additional Signature: SAovaiaP Sd"Dou Date:
Printed Name(s):
Must be wape"owrer(s)whose nam(s)are pnntec a1 iup. Gtherwse mnt3d the P*v*ig D".ht art. ore form per property
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-045 Pagel
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-701a
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480,AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS
OF TRACTS 3D, 3D2 AND 3, OBEDIAH W. KNIGHT SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 899, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.8 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY
AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "RPUD"
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO
"RPUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT
"B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN
THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG"Agricultural District
under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-045 Page 1
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and
other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
their original investment was made; and,
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-045 Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being described as portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey,
Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 5.8
acres, and more fully and completely described in exhibit "A" from "RPUD"
Residential Planned Unit Development District to "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit
Development District as depicted on the approved development plan attached hereto
and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following conditions:
RESERVED FOR CITY COUNCIL MOTION
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-045 Page 3
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-045 Page 4
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract
or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,
under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until
final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for
a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-045 Page 5
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1St reading the 21St day of June, 2016.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-045 Page 6
EXHIBIT "A"
Being described as Portions of Tracts 3D, 31D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City
of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 5.8 acres, and more fully and completely
described below:
RESERVED FOR METES AND BOUNDS
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-045 Page 7
EXHIBIT "B"
RESERVED FOR APPROVED EXHIBITS
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-045 Page 8