The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 6C CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT May 31, 2016 CASE NO: ZA16-015 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan for St. Laurence Church EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of St. Laurence Church, Kirkman Engineering is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan to rezone a tract to the north of the existing church site from "AG"Agricultural District to"CS"Community Service District, and expand the existing church site by adding a new 9,680 square foot Parish Hall, remodeling and adding 2,100 square feet to the existing Fellowship Hall, and adding parking spaces at St. Laurence Church located at 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas. The current zoning is"AG"Agricultural District and"CS"Community Service District. SPIN Neighborhood #4. At the time of this report, this project(ZA16-015) has received responses in opposition exceeding 20% of surrounding property owners. Because of this, the project has met the supermajority requirement, and will require six(6)affirmative votes by City Council for the item to pass. REQUEST DETAILS: St. Laurence Church is requesting approval of a Zoning Change from "AG"Agricultural District to "CS" Community Service District on vacant Tract 5A04A located at 549 N. Kimball Ave. St. Laurence Church has existing facilities on Lot 1 R to the south located at 517 N. Kimball Ave. St. Laurence Church is proposing a multi-phased concept plan and a site plan to expand the existing site by adding a new 9,680 Parish Hall, remodeling and expanding the existing Fellowship Hall and adding parking. This application runs concurrently with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CP16- 003), a request to change the Future Land Use from Medium Density Residential to Public / Semi-Public on Tract 5A04A to the north of the existing church site. If approved, the Future Land Use for the church site would be consistently Public/Semi- Public. The applicant has also submitted a Plat Revision application (ZA16-028)to revise the existing Lot 1 R to include Tract 5A04A. The proposed Lot 1 R1 contains 6.467 acres. VARIANCES REQUESTED: 1) Zoning Ord. 480 (43.13.a.8) Setbacks/Yards: No non-single family residential building may encroach in the area above a line having a slope of 4:1 from any single-family residential property. The proposed parish hall to the north encroaches in the 4:1 slope at a maximum of approximately 15'. The Applicant has requested a variance to not meet this requirement. The horizontal setback needed to meet this requirement for the proposed Parish Case No. ZA16-015 Hall is approximately 96 feet from the north boundary line. The applicant is requesting a variance for an 83-foot setback. 2) Driveway Ord. 634 (5.2.d) Minimum Storage Length: 75' required. The applicant proposes a storage (stacking) depth of 26 . 3) Zoning Ord. 480 (39.6) Perimeter Screening: Where a non-residential use abuts a residentially zoned lot or tract having an occupied residential dwelling, a solid fence meeting the material standards of section 39.2(b) shall be erected along the side and rear property lines abutting said residential lot or dwelling to a height of eight (8) feet. The applicant is requesting to not provide screening meeting these requirements along the northeast, east and south sides of the property, but instead use existing vegetation as screening. The applicant is providing an 8' wood fence along the northernmost property line. 4) Minimum Distance to Intersection Along Roadway: Driveway Ord. No. 634 requires a minimum distance to intersection along arterial roadway to a commercial or multi-family driveway of 200' On the Concept Plan / Site Plan the applicant is showing a distance of 180' from the centerline of the proposed driveway to the north to the ROW line of Cotswald Valley Ct. The applicant proposes a 180' distance. 5) Buffervards: The applicant is requesting a variance for the west and south bufferyard to encroach into the existing parking/paving area. 6) Buffervards: The applicant is requesting a variance to the bufferyards requirement to reallocate the required landscape items (canopy trees, accent trees and shrubs) from the buffer yards along the south and eastern most property lines to the north and west property lines. 7) Zoning Ord. 480 (43.13.a.4) Horizontal / Vertical Articulation: The applicant will require a variance in order to not meet horizontal / vertical articulation requirements per Residential Adjacency Development Overlay Development regulations along the south elevation ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider 2nd Reading Approval of Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 10, 2016 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map (F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480-716 (H) Full Size Plans (for City Council only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Jerod Potts (817) 748-8195 Case No. ZA16-015 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: St. Laurence Church APPLICANT: Kirkman Engineering PROPERTY LOCATION: 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 5A04A, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and Lot 1 R, Block A, Saint Laurence Episcopal Church Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County Texas, located at 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas. LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential / Public / Semi-Public CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "CS" Community Service District REQUESTED ZONING: "CS" Community Service District HISTORY: 517 N. Kimball December 3, 1956 - This property was annexed into the City of Southlake (Ordinance No. 17) January 7, 1969 — City Council adopted Zoning Ordinance No. 161, which designated this property as "AG" Agricultural District December 15, 1987- City Council approved 2.8 acres to be rezoned (ZA87- 040) from "AG" Agricultural to "CS" Community Service December 1, 1987 - City Council approved Preliminary Plat (ZA87-041) for 2.8 acres January 19, 1988 - City Council approved a Final Plat (ZA87-049) for 2.8 acres January 21, 1992 - City Council approved a SUP (ZA91-074) for a portable building September 16, 1997 - City Council approved a Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA97-109) for 8.5 acres to be rezoned from "AG" Agricultural to "CS" Community Service September 2, 1997 - City Council approved a plat revision (ZA97-110) for Lot 1 R, Block A, Saint Laurence Episcopal Church Addition July 27, 2000 - Zoning Board of Adjustment allowed a Variance to Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.5.a (ZBA-351), to allow a church steeple with a height of approximately seventy-five (75) feet measured from the lowest grade November 7, 2000 - City Council approved a Site Plan (ZA00-093) October 20, 2009 - City Council approved a Site Plan (ZA09-040) for a pergola Case No. Attachment A ZA16-015 Page 1 549 N. Kimball December 3, 1956 - This property was annexed into the City of Southlake (Ordinance No. 17) January 7, 1969 — City Council adopted Zoning Ordinance No. 161, which designated this property as "AG" Agricultural District According to TAD the single family residential structure that was located on this home was built in 1955. Per applicant, the structure has been demolished CITIZEN INPUT: To date, a SPIN Town Hall Forum has not been held SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Future Future Land Use Land Use Plan designates 517&549 N.Kimball Ave. aP er isem�ee,m e um nsry es 517 N. Kimball Ave. (south Future Land Use ,00 a,Food Pa � � o,a=of 9 eem Pmae, portion of the site) as - �PekPa,—p-Sp— JJI p'—semF� k Public / Semi-Public and Q ow estyResde,a 549 N. Kimball Ave. (north co�rswq�D� �� °ma e'tid l.1 r portion of the site) as ��:e"°semerc'a' Medium Density � � R 1 p Residential. Theapplicant °e°° is proposing through separate application a . Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment (CP16- — — FF 003) to change the future �mm•2a land use designation on the north portion of the site to Public/Semi-Public. The definition for Medium Density Residential per Southlake 2030 says: The Medium Density Residential category is suitable for any single-family detached residential development. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and Public /Semi-Public categories previously discussed. As proposed the proposed Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for the church expansion is consistent with the Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan designates this section of N. Kimball as an 88' A4D (4-lane divided)arterial. ROW has been dedicated for 517 N. Kimball Ave. (existing church site) and the applicant will dedicate ROW for 549 N. Kimball Ave. by Plat Revision. The applicant has submitted a Plat Revision application which is currently under review by City staff (ZA16-028). Pathway Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan shows this section of N. Kimball Ave. as existing sidewalks <8'. This site has a 6' concrete sidewalk spanning the frontage of the property boundary along N. Kimball Ave. This is consistent with the Pathways Master Plan. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions Case No. Attachment A ZA16-015 Page 2 The site currently has access from N. Kimball Ave.According to the Concept/ Site Plan, one of the existing driveways along N. Kimball Ave. will be closed, and a new driveway will be provided further north. There will be two (2)access points into the church site from N. Kimball Ave. Traffic Impact Use Square Vtpd* AM-IN AM-� IN PM_Feet • OUT Church (560) 27,696 1 252 1 11 9 10 8 • Vehicle Trips Per Day .AM-In,AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday .Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7t"Edition UTILITIES: Water The utility plan shows a proposed fire hydrant on the east side of N. Kimball Ave. with an 8" fire line to be added. The plan shows a new 2" domestic service water line to connect to the existing 12" water main along N. Kimball Ave. Sewer Sewer is provided to this site by a 12" gravity main on the west side of N. Kimball Ave. The utility plan shows two existing (2) existing sanitary sewer manholes on the west side of N. Kimball Ave and the plan shows a proposed sanitary sewer manhole on the east side of N. Kimball Ave. The applicant is proposing a 6" Private SSWR line from the existing manhole to the north and a 4" SSWR and 6" SSWR to serve the site. TREE PRESERVATION: According to the Tree Conservation Plan there is approximately 17.2%existing tree canopy coverage at the site. The plan is showing that 87.9% of the existing tree canopy coverage will be preserved. The applicant is required to preserve a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover,which they exceed with this plan. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: May 5, 2016; Approved (5-0) subject to the Staff Report dated April 29, 2016 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 29, 2016 and specifically granting the following variances noted in the staff report; variance no. 1, variance no. 2, specifically excluding and not granting variance no. 3, granting variance no. 4, granting variance no. 5 with respect to variance no. 6, note the applicant's willingness to review the placement of the relocated landscaping to maximize its location on the northern perimeter of the site, and specifically granting variance no. 7, and also noting the applicant's willingness to meet with the northern four neighbors adjacent to the property to further discuss screening alternatives, also noting the applicant's willingness to consider either relocating or reconfiguring the parking on the northern side. CITY COUNCIL: May 17, 2016; Approved (6-0) subject to the Staff Report dated May 10, 2016 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated May 10, 2016 and granting the following variances: Zoning Ord. 480 (43.13.a.8)Setbacks/Yards; Zoning Ord. 480 (43.13.a.4) Horizontal/Vertical Articulation; Driveway Ord. 634 (5.2.d) Minimum Storage Length; Driveway Ord. No. 634, Minimum Distance to Intersection Along Roadway; Zoning Ord. 480 (39.6) Perimeter Screening and noting that the applicant is in agreement that the 8-ft. wood fence along the northern most property line adjacent to the residential homes will be a board Case No. Attachment A ZA16-015 Page 3 over board fence that is a light eliminating fence; Zoning Ord. 480 (42.1) Bufferyards and Zoning Ord. Section 42 Bufferyards. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 10, 2016 N:ICommunity DevelopmentlMEMO12016 Cases1015-ZSP-St. Laurence ChurcMStaff Report1ZA16-015-CC-2016-06-07.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA16-015 Page 4 Vicinity Map St. Laurence Church 517 & 549 N. Kimball Ave. co 0 w 2419 2011 2101 2 11 0 N V N A _ 4 2131LO 2141 rn rn W 2X44 2237 2121 Q ryry�o M 223 N co 2001 J cN N co00 'n ° COJ N o 220022 J N C° R 2208 Q N Y 66TSM v 2417 L oY- 22012205220922 (0 co oLO w O Z o CD m LO u� C 2426 0 516 0 5042503 NM LO o UI -4 o Cn Cn cn 2108 V A cn � A � N � C? A CO A O OD 04 Cnn 2112 v A A � N v o (D 414 vI LO N � 2104 T It CrI cD ry� v CD cliCOA o m U' ZA 16-015 ~~ Zoning Change and W Concept Plan 1 s Site Plan 0 200 400 800 1,200 Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA16-015 Page 1 Plans and Support Information Proposed Concept Plan Site Plan K3 71 -46- 1 40�-- iL SOLITHLAKE ---------------...... ij -T, ---------- ---------- mu� CONCEFr-MM PLAN CITY CASE NO:ZA16-015 Case No. Attachment C ZAl 6-015 Page 1 Proposed Concept Plan/Site Plan Close-Up IL4Bbdl 'I La;Bbekl I I��WiI I Ia.kiJl�' 11 �, e.md. , Ir�Pw GC1AB16 ° •..cd...,e I I �iNw U2110ffb3 I 1^°°°�—Nn Oil}D331Gi I PAx.C.T. I � �R p ° 1 `--. fAT.Ci PATC T. fu+®'Rnd Di.T`�' I I O®'a.pvU� Tnvm'WvcD' Laa+�roR m.m .�7 i �f�zr°� n, LUD.-.�nII.�n�Lntrm+T i ��3w. i L6RYmIW9Mtf n ne �l ROUCBRS\UOMT 410.60' LVD-IVBLiC/BP.MI ' IFAwnw..u�vi 41 rnxiBiY O ° ___ g. 11 W 9oR°I. R33 Oc, ___RRRwttn- wawaaRw R�Gaa Z�. R-,+fmwuayf - - 1ii I�aa.Na D3l11NN63 —IT R3 C e2E' P g. t6�•n 3 wwRwRwRww . 131 zs' N88°13'55"E 180.73' --- w• y jMEW - - E ,,. TO GLOM !.- R,,, :>a a Lan-lmc®,se x'• � I I � � --• I / / L—A' �\ o IL LEGEND PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDE WALK PROPOSED BUFFER YARD PARKING COUNT PROPOSED ENTRANCE'S AND EXQTB PROPOS®LIGHT PROPOS®FACE AND SACK OF CURB FUTURE FACE AND BACK OF CURB PROPOSED FIRE LANE STRIPING EXISTING FIRE LANE STRIPWG Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 2 Site Data Summary Chart SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Existing Zoni ng: Tract 5A04A Agricultural Community Service Lot 111 Community Service Community Service Proposed Zoning: Tract 5A04A Community Service Community Service Lot 113 Community Service Community Service Land Use Designation: Tract 5A04A Medium Density Residential Public/Semi-Public Lot 113 Public/Semi-Public Public/Semi-Public Gross Acreage 6.47 6.47 6.47 Net Acreage 5.14 5.14 5.14 Number of Proposed Lots 0 0 0 Percentage of Site Coverage 9.84 12.09 Area of Open Space 163563 124696 Percentage of Open Space 58.07 44.27 Area of Impervious Coverage 118121 156987 Percentage of Impervious 41.93 55.73 Coverage Proposed Building Area(Foot 11,789 9,659 21,449 Print in Sq.Ft.) Existing Building Area(Foot 15,907 27,696 Print in Sq.Ft. _ Total Building Area(Foot 27,696 37,356 Print in Sq. Ft.) Number of Stories 1 1 Maximum Building Height 35'-0" 35'-0" Proposed Floor Area" 11,789 9,659 21,449 Proposed Floor Area by Use Public/Semi-Public"" 11,789 9,659 21,449 Required Parking""" 77 TBD TBD Provided Parkin Standard 146 226 226 Handicap 6 7 7 Total 152 233 233 Maximum Seating Capacity 456 699 699 Required Loading Spaces 0 0 0 Provided Loading Spaces 0 0 0 Area of Outside Storage 0 0 0 Percentage of Outside 0 0 0 Storage Start Construction 3rd Quarter 2016 TBD Month/Year End Construction Month/Year 3rd Quarter 2017 TBD 'Square footages from existing building are included in quantity/percentage. "Phase 2 floor areas cannot yet be determined because proposed additions and new building have not yet be designed. '"The Existing Sanctuary currently seats 230 people. """Phase 2 required parking cannot yet be determined since the number of seats to be added to the main sanctuary in Phase 2 has not yet been determined. Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 3 Tree Conservation Plan - Close-up _ if /l M I.ee s,Rb 1 t ' i j I' j Ivvumem N.D2120i6i6J 7 I P.R.T.C.T. RF3 E-TIAL L - -- -- 1 to J / C))r1 St.Laurence Exiii ting Tree Cover Peroentsp otei istinguw omron the entire sins(Assuming Percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved 1T die.Canopy) (Assuming 1S'dia.Canopy) Existing Total Existing Percentage of Number of Total Canopy Total Existing Percentage of Number of Canopy Cover TntalPrnprrty FxictingTrrP Trees to be CnvPrtohp CanapyCrwPr FxistingTrrP Trees (SgFt) Area(SgFt) Canopy Removed Removed to Remain Canopy Coverage(96) (SgFt) (Sq Ft) Preserved(961 277 48,949.94 283,876.60 17.2% 30 5,301.44 43,648.50 87.9% LEGEND EYJ.STING TREE TO REMA01 E%1.`"TBIG TREE STATW UNDETERMINED E%L`"TBIG TREE M BE C, REMOVED PROPERTY UNE --� TRraNOTES m orAu exianRc mea ewarourooR eE awv[v C �RAeEMRnE=. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 4 Boundary/Topo_graphic/Tree Survey- Close-up . ..� I P.&TP—r. t X.:. " 1fr%1a'Uq.Fant UN. a wt (aeiz � _N57 " - (a2t21761a7) -- 410tG0 Y " . ra12055463 r.K.rcr. II if I NX M ::• �""' _I.s�1`.{�'�-•�,( e .� ,---47 r-b 2221 .: . ;�; � .—� / /r �,• ,,>,n�» / � MQ 5-f Sf �r I ;.� -•Yt' J r',• ..�' � •r� - \t\_dl�i F4'_ J�1f IGt /o \s�et�� ` rr / / '�',Ir 1 ` r..;•.rI — , III 1/ 7 t \\ ! �, / . �s'y� t w •.•-s ••y.. f : I l l l s r f /"`�. "�+ �'>, mw• 1 1 i;.. •f;� I�,...�. w,�r.. �_,�.r'� I�j i�''' r / r ��\ttttt /r � .fr r � R ! t` - •� � �.� s��.��—�„�_,'+T,�\/••`_�.> ;aaaat\ /r/r ...•. ,Y." xae t't 1 W� / // / / I n `Z1 ` `'�A, - ,, \.1 +�tf 7f�' f■ • � I`�, , I i /i r +r t-Z �l a �� {lam a�' •:• t ^, .5.jr f IE'; =•y 9µ'"�.d�r 1 Ir� t // I iN . P5 1 IS. ' J L-1 tl!II rt r lr� / o �DWKY C—a rr 1 ' . ' 1 4°�{ r a/'S„swZe'wn � 1 c f r / ,®•'_ ay��'°°°�* An V. l a.: $ 1" / I l / r� �' ///f�—u'a �t�t / A d�u�s \\vtt � \� ,x, �. � .•.-• ~a Iso116, Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 5 Proiect Narrative and Variances Kirkman Engineering 4821 Merlot Avenue,Suite 210 3 Grapevine,TX 76051 i r k m a n 817.488.4960 ENGINE F R I N G April 18,2016 City of Southlake 1400 Main Street,Suite 310 Southlake,Texas 76092 RE: St, Laurence Church Expansion—Concept Plan/Site Plan Submittal This letter is to provide a narrative of the concept/site plan application submitted to the City of Southlake. The overall expansion site, currently being two lots, contains existing infrastructure serving St. Laurence Church and a vacant lot. The church has decided to expand which will include both new buildings and renovations to existing buildings. This project was determined necessary by the church staff and its members to accommodate and serve the growing demand of worship and fellowship space. This expansion project will include a new Parish Hall (9,680 SF) and the remodel and expansion of the existing fellowship call (6,947 SF). To accomplish this expansion project,the lot to the north is being re- zoned and will ultimate be replatted into a single lot with the existing church site. This project is the first phase of a multi-phase expansion project for the church, with the scope and timeframe of future phases yet to be determined. All proposed improvements shown in this plan submittal are to be constructed in one phase. The existing vacant lot, being Tract 5A04A from the Samuel Freeman Survey Abstract 525, is being rezoned to a Community Service District, which is consistent with the existing church property. This portion of the plan is considered as a concept plan per the City of Southlake re-zoning requirements. The overall site, including the re-zoned tract, also meets the requirements for Site Plan approval. It is the intent of this plan submittal to provide the necessary plan review and approval for the re-zoning of Tract 5A04A and to obtain building permits for the Phase 1 expansion project. The proposed plan complies with all City of Southlake zoning, subdivision and landscape ordinances, with the exception of the following variances being requested: 1. Residential Adjacency Overlay Zone Building Setback. Due to the height of the proposed Parish Hall, the required building setback along the north property line is 96-feet. The proposed building is located approximately 83-feet from the north property line. As shown on the Tree Conservation Plan, there are currently twenty-two existing, mature trees along the north property line. These trees are located within the required 10-foot landscape buffer yard. There is also interior landscape areas being proposed between the proposed building structure and the existing lot line. Every effort will be made to minimize the effect of the encroachment into this building setback with screening and landscape features. KIRKMAN ENGINEERING -- 4821 Meriot Avenue.Suite 210,Grapevine,TX 76051 Ph-817-488-4960 :: TBPE Firm#15874 Rage 1 of 2 COO= 114v. MLL0%.1rrrrcnt C ZA16-015 Page 6 2. Vehicular stacking depth at proposed north driveway access point. The minimum required stacking depth for this driveway is 75-feet. This proposed plan provides approximately 26-feet of stacking depth. The minimum stacking depth is determined, per city ordinances, based on the number of parking spaces the driveway serves. Because this is a place of worship, heavy use of the facility will be limited on weekends only, more specifically limited to a several hour window on Sundays for services. The impact the proposed stacking depth to the general public on a daily basis will be minimal, if any at all. 3. Perimeter screening requirements. Screening along the north, east and south sides of the property to be done via the existing landscaping and trees currently on site. Any attempt to install a screen wall, additional trees or other landscape features will damage the existing vegetation currently established. When possible, if any areas within the proposed buffer yards are to be disturbed due to construction operations, property screening and landscaping will be installed as needed per city ordinances. 4. Fire Lane Minimum radius. The turning movement, as the you enter the property at the north driveway access point and turn south,does not comply with the 30-ft minimum radius. Because this proposed driveway access does not correspond to an adjacent median opening, any truck access to the property will be accomplished from the northbound traffic lanes into the existing driveway access point. When trying to exit the property, proper turning movement measurements are provided via a turnaround located at the northeast corner of the proposed improvements. Please don't hesitate to contact me at 817-488-4960 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jonathan Schindler, P.E. KIRKMAN ENGINEERING -- 4821 Merlot Avenue,SLite 210,Grapevine,TX 76051 Ph=817-488-4960 :- TBPE Firm#15874 Page 2 of 2 Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 7 Letter of Revisions Made After the May 5, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Kirkman Engineering 4.821 Merlot Avenue,suite 210 Grapevine,TX 76051 T r km a n 817,4884960 1BIIC May 10,2016 City of Southlake 1400 Main Street,Suite 310 Southlake,Texas 76092 RE: St. Laurence Church Expansion–Concept Plan/Site Plan Revisions The Concept Plan/Site Plan for the St.Laurence Episcopal Church expansion project has been revised per comments received from the City of Southlake Planning&Zoning Commission Board on May S,2016. The revisions are detailed below. Concept-Site Plan 1. A proposed 8'high wooden fence has been added along the northern property line adjacent to Lots 1-4,Bock 1 of the Estancia neighborhood. This proposed fence will comply with all City of Southlake screening ordinance requirements(size,type,height, etc.)- The proposed fence has been initial determined to be approximately S'south of the north property line in an attempt to preserve the existing trees along the property line. 2- Changed zoning callout for Mesco Addition to'I-1'- Landscape Plan 1. A proposed 8' high wooden fence has been added along the northern property line. See revision note above_ 2- The Buffer Yard Landscape Summary Chart has been updated to account for the reallocation of the landscape requirements from the south and west buffer yards to the north and east. Additional rows have been provided to show the overall total required and total provided requirements. The landscape plan itself has been revised to match the updated summary chart_ 3- The Interior Landscape Summary Chart has been updated to account for both proposed and existing building footprints_ The plan has been revised accordingly_ Please feel free to contact me at 817-458-4960 if you have any questions- Sincerely, Jonathan Schindler,P KIRKNAN ENGINEERING -.- 4621 Merlot:,venue.Surto 210,Grapevine.TX 76051 Pti=877188-460 = TSPE Flrm 015874 age Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 8 Overall Floor Plan b I I -- I I -------------- --------- ------- a G L____ __-_--4 I,1 --------------------- --- -_ - ------ I l I I � ------- -------------- I � FTI -- - ----- ------ � I � --a---- r i -� I FEE - I I I • 4 Ih p I I _ I I --ri ri l OVERALL FLOOR PLAN �r - Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) R54.a L - - _ a 0" do OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 88• a Tor w 19 1S J 7a I� ase o. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 9 Exterior Elevations— South Elevations w ----- j SOUTH ELMAAION ,� .,,gym ---•- M LI ME SOUTH ELEVATION : Color Rendering— South Elevations SOUTH ELEVATION I . Ir#a� t ` t SOUTH ELEVATIONI Proposed Concept / Site Plan P-54-11 L --� o De 110' o, ,� Variance to horizontal w 1 articulation requested gar 19 15 Ar I Variance to vertical -7E.'"& A i articulation requested Case No.1 Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 10 Exterior Elevations- West Elevation y mmLL LJy _ o WEST ELEVATION ti--- --- ---D----a----a--- L- 3 u------------ 0 0 0 0 Color Renderin_g- West Elevation 1-sa ..xl ammlc ,ncm �� ON 11 H WEST ELEVATION , Kw,e ue_ro .w Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) R5d a Qo 110, gF OD O O O O O O w U lar U 19' 1S Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 11 Exterior Elevations— North Elevation -------------- NORTH ELEVATION I Jul i 1 L Color Rendering— North Elevation NORTH ELEVATION 1 : ':- r g5'BUILOING LINE - --n — — — — Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) R54.0 L - - -1 a t 00 110' o, O 0 0 0 0 0 88 Q-loll, y15 15 Boa Adoo Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 12 Exterior Elevations— East Elevation �E.4c Mk 1 1 I _ 1 I EAST ELEVATION 1 I vJar vr•N' wi3 �__ Color Rendering— East Elevation Kyo � i EAST ELEVATION wac ve•Iw w T r g5'BUILOING Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) 00 110' P"a°ex� 0, 0 0 0 a o 0 88 aF01. w 15 15 �a 1• * *+;n°F Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 13 Pedestrian Access Plan - Close-up r , a I I I.� ek P2&*I U Io—Nu D2I205SM PEDESTRIAN ACCESS I PJLT.C.T. I 4'CONCRETE SIDEWALK7ANED•R-vLro i D.=16DIG1f DENT- 1 d 0 r • \`PEDESTRIAN ACCESS / 5'CONCRETE SIDEWALK NG CONCRETE • / SIDEWALK PEDESTRIAN ACCESS �• // 5 CONCRETE SIDEWALK • I _ I 1 s 0 • s • 1 ` - PEDESTRIAN ACCESS RIAN ASS 12'CONCRETE SIDEWALK , y ETE SIDEWALK / I EMMING CONCRETE J L SIDEWALK J / PEDESTRIAN ACCESS Z / 14'CONCRETE SIDEWALK ' / z PEDESTRIAN ACCESS • J CCONCRETE SIDEWALK I --- Y PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 5 CONCRETE SIDEWALK x EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK— EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK l /I 1 1 LEGEND PROPOSED CONCRETE SI DEINALK Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 14 Grading Plan — Close-up "OP—SF—P-le IQ L.s,M—k I 18 ry L—N..D21205s463 P.P-T.C.T. ONED'R-PD' DE4� 15- -0, P-,-.N— Tp-w60 NSS-13'55-E 180.13' 70 -574 TIM. Ilk, T bb L-58tW S88*25'24"W 568-97' LEGEND PROPOSED CONTOUR ED EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING FLOAT ARROW PROPOSED FLOW ARROW TP TOP OF PAVEMENT FF FINISHED FLOOR Case No. Attachment C ZA1 6-015 Page 15 Proposed Drainage Map- Close-up 1- 1 I f Iuac�,N°.D2121551W PRT.CT. r I -` 7A\ED'RMJD' I �.- LI.D.=I6DIL'Y DLIi.73Y / -� I J M.,Y tlser n, h ' \ / rf � 1000 I ).3'UIDlty E°eeman; ` � I 1 GOE.A.Yltle]900 -11"S Otility]900 w,t I -- �� 1900 r.rat E°..m.�t 5'UtiitY Eosemmt (v.BY05/P.2�I) _ DRAINAGE AREA CALCULATIONS(PROPOSED DrairegeArea Acres Runoff CA T k 0,2 )ro Q,o his 025 1100 01100 Comments Coeff. (min.) (inlhr.) (c.f.s.) (inAv.) (c.f.s.) (in)tr.) (c.f.s.) (in/hr.) (c.f.s.) Al 1.52 0.80 1.22 10.0 471 5.73 6.51 7.92 7.55 9.18 9.24 11.24 A2 0.42 0.80 0.34 10.0 4.71 1.58 6.51 2.19 7.55 2.54 9.24 3.10 A3 0.50 0.80 0.40 10.0 4.71 1.88 6.51 2.60 7.55 3.02 9.24 3.70 A4 0.15 0.80 0.12 10.0 4.71 0.57 6.51 0.78 7.55 0.91 9.24 1.11 TOTAL 9.76 13.491 15.64 1 1 19.15 LEGEND BASIN NAME DRAINAGE BASIN 1.00 ac. Acr+Es� DRAINAGE AREA -r Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 PROPOSED FLOW Page 16 Utility Plan - Close-up I In•I.wen•No.DLl0iii6) IL P.R.S.C.T. m 1 'NF_lID\SLSL PROPOSED WATER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER / i EXISTING WATER / . I EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE S \ I I 1 NOTES f I I PRIVATF SANITARY SFWFI2 SFI2Vl':F$ NFFD A PI LMRING PFRMI T AND MUST \ ` --- nF INSP-CTFr nY null niNG f INSPECTORS PRIOR TO BURIAL. / � / I f / EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT t \ Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 17 Landscape Plan - Close-up - - rcroxi wsnesI-UFFM - -- — • • •rte. ' • • � � „� � 9 •oPm SP.P•d- • Lot b.Bre t ZEDD' .-Ml( 'R-PVi LU.DEDIUM 1)E11eI1Y . � • � RPBm[T'fiAL • O �O O� o . r�r• I e � gl / I tlo fi " r � o, 000 � : rb�eN N' '� \ ` .ps .y�• O 0 0 0 CP 0 O {� I O O J � •O � a I O O �i O � r I • 09 O A O ��—� r • + O OS //• O O I � r o • � I �� Iz� . � •r • � � I — —_ / • �r � �� O — O BUFFER YARD LANDSCAPE SUMMARY CHART Lac8fButter Yard Type of Width(ft) Required/ Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Notes o., Len Buffer Yard Exlstln Provided Required 5 10 37 Hedge-"l West Property Boundary E 10 Existing 3 0 0 (453 LF) Proposed 2 10 50 Hedge-HI Required 8 12 39 North I Property Boundary (38e IF) B 10 Existing 19 3 D Proposed 0 39 117 North 11 Property Boundary Required 4 6 19 (180 LF) B 10 Existing 5 0 0 Proposed 0 6 26 Required 4 5 13 East I Property Boundary C 10 Existing2 0 0 (1D1 IF) Proposed 2 5 13 East 11 Prope rty Boundary Required 13 18 52 (427 IF) C 10 Existin 16 0 0 Pro osed 0 0 0 Required 646 South Property Boundary (568 IF) A 5 Existing0 0 9 0 0 Proposed 0 0 0 BUFFER YARD SUMMARY Total Re uired 40 63 206 Total Provided 58 1 63 1 206 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE SUMMARY CHART Required Interior Provided Interior Total Building SF Ground Cover Seasonal Cover (Proposed) LandseapeArea Landscape Area Canopy Trees UnderstoryTrees Shrubs (SF) (SF) Int C SF SF 27,696 8,309 31,271 17 34 208 1,247 167 le 18 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA16-015 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 5/10/16 Project Name: Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan — St. Laurence Church APPLICANT: Kirkman Engineering OWNER: St. Laurence Church Jonathan Schindler Father John Jordan 4821 Merlot Ave., Suite 210 519 N. Kimball Ave. Grapevine, TX 76051 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 488-4960 Phone: (817) 481-3335 Email: jonathan.schindler@trustke.com Email: frjohnjord CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/10/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT / SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT JEROD POTTS AT (817) 748-8195. Planning Review Jerod Potts Planner I Phone: (817) 748-8195 Email: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us 1. Within the narrative: a. Please clarify which phase specifically improvements will be completed. The narrative currently states "All proposed improvements shown in this plan are to be constructed in one phase." Include which phase this refers to. b. Update the narrative to reflect all variances being requested. c. The first paragraph references the "existing fellowship call." Please make this consistent with other portions of the application. 2. On the Concept Plan / Site Plan: a. The concept plan refers to "Future Expansion" and the Site Data Summary Chart refers to "Phase 2." Consider making these references to future site expansion consistent, including in the project narrative. 3. Show and label all minimum building setback lines in accordance with the underlying zoning and/or any applicable overlay district (i.e. Corridor, Residential Adjacency and Non-residential Overlays). Buildings must be setback such that no portion of the building encroaches above a 4:1 slope line from a residential property line. However, one story buildings less than 20 feet in height may be as close as 40 feet from the residential property line. If the building is over 20 feet in height (measured from the highest adjacent grade within 5 feet of the building to the midpoint between the roof peak and the plate) provide a cross sectional slope exhibit demonstrating compliance. The proposed parish hall to the north encroaches in the 4:1 slope at a maximum of approximately 15'. The Applicant has requested a variance to not meet this requirement. The horizontal setback needed to meet this requirement for the proposed Parish Hall is approximately 96 feet from the north boundary line. The applicant is requesting a variance for an 83-foot setback. 4. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 1 a. The new driveway at the north end of the site needs to be a minimum of 200 feet from the ROW of the street to the north. Verify that the distance is measured at the ROW line of the intersecting street to the centerline of the driveway. The applicant has requested a variance to this requirement. b. The minimum stacking depth required is 75 feet. (A variance with justification will be needed. The applicant has requested a variance to this requirement. 5. Provide a minimum 8' screening device meeting the requirements of Ordinance 480, Section 39 along all boundaries abutting residentially zoned or designated property and any property zoned "AG" having an occupied residential dwelling. This requirement appears to impact the north, east and south boundaries of the site. The applicant is requesting to not provide screening meeting these requirements along the northeast, east and south sides of the property, but instead use existing vegetation as screening. The applicant is providing an 8' wood fence along the northernmost property line. 6. Regarding the scaled elevations sheets: a) Provide an elevation index that shows the perspective view in relation to the site plan for each elevation. b) Ensure that the color renderings match the scaled and dimensioned elevations shown on the full-size plans. i. The south elevation of the proposed new Parish Hall shows cut limestone veneer on all of the drawings except one, where it appears to have been left out on the color rendering (A3.3, 3). ii. The north elevation of the proposed expansion of the Expansion of the Fellowship Hall shows brick veneer between the expansion of the Fellowship Hall and the proposed new Parish Hall, and the scaled elevation sheet shows this area as blank. Please ensure these match (A3.2,2 and A3.4,2) c) The combined elevations showing the proposed Fellowship Hall and Parish Hall (south elevation) do not meet the horizontal or vertical articulation requirements per Residential Adjacency Development Overlay Development Regulations. A variance will be required. 7. Show the location and method of screening of any mechanical equipment. Mechanical equipment must be screened of view from residential properties and adjacent ROW. Applicant has indicated that mechanical equipment will be located on the roof. 8. Parking for a place of worship is based on seating capacity of the assembly areas based on a ratio of 1 parking space per 3 seats. Please update the Site Data Summary Chart to accurately reflect the number of required spaces. Based on a maximum seating capacity of 456, 152 spaces would be required. The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may benefit and does not represent a requirement. • Staff recommends providing a materials sample board as part of any presentation to the P & Z and City Council. Public Works/Engineering Review Steven D. Anderson, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 Fax: (817) 748-8077 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 2 GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet, if applicable. 4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. 5. Label the distances to the nearest drives or street intersections in both directions from the proposed drive. Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot— not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre- construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 3 * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. On previous Tree Conservation Plans the existing trees outside of the northeast corner of the north parking were proposed to be preserved but the grading plan showed 3' —4' of topography grade change around them. On the most recently submitted Tree Conservation Plan the same trees are shown to be removed in order to provide for the change in topography. The trees are quality trees that are in good condition and can be easily preserved by constructing a retaining wall at the back of the curb of the parking and access drive. * The proposed tree conservation complies with the required Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The property has approximately 17.2% of existing tree cover and 70% of that tree cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 87.9% of the existing tree cover. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the the entire site existing tree cover to be Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 4 preserved* 0% -20% 70% 20.1 —40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% , 80.1% - 100% 30% * The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. Parking lot landscape areas are the required and proposed landscape islands within the parking lot areas and at the ends of rows of parking. These parking lot landscape islands are required to contain at least one canopy tree with the rest of the area containing shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, seasonal color, or a combination of these plant materials. If an area contains a light pole two (2) accent trees and the remaining required plant material may be planted in place of the required canopy tree. Provide the required plant material in each of the parking landscape island areas. When the Landscape Plans are submitted with the Building Plans for a Building Permit, the correct plant material must be provided within the parking lot landscape areas. 2. 2.There are thirty-four (34) accent trees proposed within the interior landscape and thirty-nine (39) accent trees proposed to be planted within the North 1 bufferyard. The submitted Landscape plan shows only twenty-nine (29) within the interior landscape, and thirteen (13) for the North 1 bufferyard. When the Landscape Plans are submitted with the Building Plans for a Building Permit, the correct plant material must be provided within the bufferyards and interior landscape area. 3. 3.The Landscape Plan is required to be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect. When the Landscape Plans are submitted with the Building Plans for a Building Permit, the submitted plans must be prepared and stamped by a Registered Landscape Architect. QUALIFICATION TO PREPARE PLANS: For all lots greater than 30,000 square feet, Landscape Plans shall be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect. For lots less than 30,000 square feet, a Landscape Designer or Landscape Contractor, knowledgeable in plant materials and landscape design may also prepare the landscape plan. Irrigation plans shall be prepared by a Licensed Irrigator or Landscape Architect or other professional as authorized by the State of Texas. The Landscape Administrator may reject plans if deemed of insufficient quality or completeness and require that plans be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect or other qualified professional. * The proposed building additions are greater in size than 5,000 square feet and/or 30% of the existing buildings square footage. The entire property is required to comply with the Landscape Ordinance and Bufferyards regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Existing buildings: Buildings in existence on the effective date of this ordinance shall be considered legally nonconforming as it pertains to this ordinance. New construction greater in size than 30% of the existing building or greater than 5,000 square feet shall require compliance with this ordinance as it applies to the entire square footage of the existing building and proposed Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 5 addition. New construction intended to increase the square footage by less than 30% of the existing building or less than 5,000 square feet shall be required to meet the requirements herein only as it pertains to the square footage of the new construction. Bufferyards are required to be provided along all property boundary lines. The applicant is proposing to use the existing plant material to satisfy the requirements of the bufferyards landscaping. Any existing plant material which otherwise satisfies the requirements of the bufferyard may be counted toward satisfying all requirements as long as the existing plant material is in good health and not altered during any phase of the proposed development or construction. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 Fax: (817) 748-8181 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet and/or buildings that have additions to the structure that cause it to exceed 6,000 square feet. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001. Phone 214-638-7599. (Fellowship hall addition causes the building to be in excess of 6,000 square feet) The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is on the riser. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes. (FDC locations not indicated on plans, add FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection, and fire hydrants as necessary to meet requirements.) Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager Phone: (817) 748-8607 Fax: (817) 748-8027 Email: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 6 Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, non-residential park dedication fees in the amount of$2,400 per gross acre x 0.93 acres= $2,232.00 will be required. However, a credit of $3000 for existing residential dwelling is allowed. Therefore, no park dedication fee is required. Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. Informational Comments: Staff strongly recommends contacting Daniel Cortez in the City Manager's Office to determine if a SPIN meeting would be beneficial to your application. Daniel can be contacted by phone at (817) 748-8029 or by e-mail at dcortez@ci.southlake.tx.us. For more information about SPIN and the SPIN process please go to SouthlakeSPIN.org. There appears to be an existing 7.5' UE along the north boundary of the existing church lot that will need to be abandoned due to the proposed improvements. This can be done with the "Plat Revision" that will be required for a building permit, subject to utility company and City Council approval. Please note that the proposed standing seam metal roof must have a factory applied non-metallic matte finish. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.13 is required on the proposed buildings. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.13 on all facades within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. Show the type and height of all intended lighting. The applicant has included a note on the Concept Plan / Site Plan indicating that all lighting must comply. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 7 All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479 and execution of an avigation easement and release on the required plat revision. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall, stone, rock or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be considered a masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g., EIFS — exterior insulation and finish systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry material. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21, Building Color Standards for Non-Residential Buildings. Tract 5A04A (549 N. Kimball Ave.) to the north of Lot 1 R is unplatted. In order to obtain a building permit for this portion of the property, a plat application must be submitted, reviewed, approved, and recorded with Tarrant County. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 8 EXHIBIT 43-A BUILDING ARTICULATION 1i=Height of building MHFL=Maximum horizontal facade length MVFL=Maximum wilical facade length MHOL=Minimum horizontal offset length MVOL=Minimum vertical offset length Mil .... ..... iul!1i4---------------- UN. Q %-0 MUE,1,1 W*-L 3CIT) M1101.- MHFLn25%ofniAxijnwnicngthofeither adjacent pIA". ISOMETRIC OF HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION r MVF't- of inawnurn[corh MM t) or either adjacent p[iw 3(t MVOL- 157E(11) L! ON 1!RM-:1 y M . -a NO PLAN VIEW-HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION ELEVATION-VERTICAL ARTICULATION 43-25 Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 9 Surrounding Property Owners E KIRKWOOD BLVD omg 2011 211 2423 24 2101 2131 141 2244 2232 2121 N M 23 2001 ry 241 2200 L]2420 d5f "' N LN 2417 2411 24 22.12z05zz0o 1� g o $ � ^ti tih 2426 2504 516 Ro 504LN 2503 2505 o v So g S 414 SPO# Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1 579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2202 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.03170692 NR 2 579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2206 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.01170895 NR 3 579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2210 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.01029545 NR 4 579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2221 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 8.10500000 NR 5 AMWT SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 584 N KIMBALL AVE 0.46591389 NR 6 BABARIA, GORDHANBHAI H SF1-A 604 SHADY LN 0.97203979 NR 7 CHEN,SHANSHAN RPUD 2209 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.26550477 0 8 CHU, EDWARD RPUD 2200 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.29978438 j 0 9 CORP OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE FW AG 549 N KIMBALL AVE 0.93571468 NR 10 DOVE ROAD WATER ASSOC SF1-A 480 SHADY LN 0.01800000 NR 11 FABER, HOWARD S RPUD 2205 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.27790278 0 12 IVESTER, EMORY 0 AG 501 N KIMBALL AVE 3.62300000 NR 13 JAMES, DAVID B SF1-A 600 SHADY LN 0.90237656 NR 14 JUNEJA,VIKAS RPUD 2201 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.29707209 0 15 KIMBALL ROAD LP 11 500 N KIMBALL AVE 1.60990870 NR 16 LEE, K WAYNE SP2 566 N KIMBALL AVE 0.65935311 NR 17 MALONEY, RANDY C SF1-A 426 SHADY LN 2.00423953 NR 18 MALONEY, ROBBIE JOAN SF1-A 500 SHADY LN 0.91627575 NR 19 MDP SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 400 N KIMBALL AVE 6.13207159 F 20 ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO NR LLC CS 550 N KIMBALL AVE 2.54920198 21 PETERSON, ROBBIE JOAN SF1-A 504 SHADY LN 0.48430487 NR 22 SCHEIBEL,TRACY E SF1-A 516 SHADY LN 0.46765359 NR 23 SCHEIBEL,TRACY E SF1-A 520 SHADY LN 0.96975795 NR Case No. Attachment E ZA16-015 Pagel 24 SCROGGINS, MARCUS L RPUD 2204 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.26334351 O 25 SMITH, MICHAEL RPUD 2208 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.28261017 O 26 ST LAURENCE EPISCOPAL CHURCH CS 517 N KIMBALL AVE 5.58835122 NR 27 Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR 28 Superintendent of Grapevine NR Colleyville ISD 29 Superintendent of Keller ISD NR 30 Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR 31 TD C MANAAGEMENT LLC SP2 560 N KIMBALL AVE 0.48202137 NR 32 WANG, KUN RPUD 2213 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.29365074 O Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Responses Received: In Favor: (1) Opposed To: (7) Undecided: () No Response: (24) Case No. Attachment E ZA16-015 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Notification Response Form ZA16-015 M" ing Date: May 5, 2016 at 6:30 PM CHEN,SHANSHAN 2209 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s)of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor ofopposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan /Site Plan referenced above. Spaco for comments regarding your position: -K, SCC,- - Signature: Date: Additional Signature: L �� _. Date: v �6 Printed Name(s): Must be property gwner(s)whose namcfgi se printed at top. 0(he wise cmwo lie manning Departrnem. One form per properly_ Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Pagel Notification Response Farm ZA 16-015 Meeting Date: May 5, 2016 at 6:30 PM JUNEJA, VIKA 2201 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT SOUTHLAKE, TQC 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of �ep�d to undecided abort (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding yrau-r position: Signature, Data: Additional Signa re: Date: Printed Name(s): 14 4A ;V LLIF-. ? Muci be properly ower(s)whale rwmei%)are primed at tap_ Olhar*ise nont ipi the Planning Departrnenl. One form per pro&4 q. Phone Number (optional) �- - �/Q ! Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 2 t4v. 5. 2(116 ' :§7PM WPLIS'AR00 FCMTHI-_ NC. 6621 F. Notification Response Form i ect o a ZA16.01 Meeting Date: May 5, 2016 at 6:30 PM 0 1 SMITH, MICHAEL J o 2208 CO'I'SWOLD VALLEY CT SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 PLEAT>X PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the :)roposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Flan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position; �'� 15• M eJn�-*��.,�.,��c�_ `� �. l...uwe.��_eC,kurcQn. ►s t' vr!b�n - � 1 1 � t D�Y1P.�t.-� `� ndr` Plby,C�t- Q S.e � jkj — v �f�15+�M1� yGGa e+�q�"IfJ�7 Ci R h ki& C.YY�►� �. CXUr7�� l{u 0!r t c y-,e.4.n r, r)6-,\ gvY1 cod Co C- wi11_ tV e lUca+� �►, rC.•et– be.inr� 'so G(aS�+- a our Signat.are: - _ -- _ _ Date: Additional Sig tures - Date: Printeo Name(s): Mkc1�-,1 S S►ry.r lam- �r„�o� roluat be prr oerty owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department One form por Property. n4 Phone Number (optional): '11---b , Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 3 Notification Response Form ZA16.015 Meeting Date: May 5, 2016 at 6:30 PM WANG, KUN 2213 COTSWO[.D VALLEY CT SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circie or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan I Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: ' — e -- Signature: Date- Additional Signature: — Date: Printed Name(s): — t,ruw be property Dwner(s!whose namo(.si ara panted 31 fN 0marwiFe Z&WYL F;anrdng Denlartmera one form per property, Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 4 Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA16-015 City of Southlake Meeting Date: May 5, 2016 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 FABER, HOWARD S Phone: (817)748-8621 2205 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT Fax: (817)748-8077 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed o undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: II c. of . it < < ..l4,9 , Itk Signature: Date: s•Z -J(p Additional Signature: l_1"�U�r-� ��.t,,L Date: 5 cz-aj Printed Name(s): �N8Q MD M,1 a,f-A-rut 'Fa?-,(--l'Z- t -.e names)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 5 Estancia Homeowner Responses Notilikalion Response I'mm ZA 16-015 Meeting Date:May 5,2016 at 6:3,0pm Board of Directors(Dayna IMI,Chakyan Lo,Heather Mollere)and Homeowners of Estancia Being the owner(s)of the property so noted below,are hereby In favor of opposed to undecided about the proposed Zoning Changc and Concept Plan 1 Site Plan reterenced above. Gregory B.Asher-1-1 B2 1 2244 Cotswald Valley Court Southlake,TX 76092 Myrna Cardg-West-L3 132 2236 Cotswold Valley Court Southlake,TX 76092 Shanshan Chen&Ken Lee-L3 B I �'e J t D 2209 Cotswold Valley Court Southlake,TX 76092 Edward Chu-L7 B2 2200 Cotswold Valley Court Southlake,TX 76092 Paul&Dayna Doll-L7 Bl (Board of Directors) 2237 Cotswold Valley Court Southlake,TX 76092 Howard&Miriam Faber-L2 Bl 2205 Cotswold Valley Court �Southlake,TX76092 Nk�� - Y I b The Thomas A.Houser Living"frust-L6 BI 2229 Cotswold Valley Court Southlake,"1'X 76092 ©�►Ode C� '�o Vikas Juneja&Ashita Mehta-Ll Bl 2201 Cotswold Valley Court Southlake,TX 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 6 Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 7 Chakyan Lo&Qing Xuc-L4 B2(Board of Dircetors) 2232 Cotswold Valley Court �G- O tR Southlake,TX 76092 Marc&Heather Mollem-L2 132(Board of Directors) 2240 Cotwold Valley Court - Southlake,TX 76092 Marcus Scmggins-L6 B2 r 2204 Cotswold Valley Court (� Southlake,TX 76092 Michael&Kim Smith-L5 B2 2208 Cotswold Valley Court Southlake,TX 76092 �-- Kan Wang&Zhi Li-L4 Bl J� Wail m04 2213 Cotswold Valley CourtSouthlake,TX 76092 579 Kimball LLC-2202 Cotswold Valley Court 579 Kimball LLC-2206 Cotswold Valley Court 579 Kimball LLC 2210 Cotswold Valley Court 579 Kimball LLC-2221 Cotswold Valley Court Concerns: 1. -1)t-VeW" ,-fva��;c Flo) ori VII.11� 2. � e,,r 3. 4. CAR, � AUNT 5. 6. 7. Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 8 Letter of Support w N I)ICI Dl:\'l.l()I'.\11\"I" • P:\Rl�l Rti May 10, 2016 Jeffrey Medici Medici Development Partners, LLC 1203 White Chapel Blvd Suite 100 Southlake TX 76092 TO: Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission/Southlake City Council RE: Letter of Support for St. Laurence Church As the master developer of Kimball Park-the 15.5 acre commercial development adjacent to St. Laurence Church on Kimball Avenue-I wholeheartedly support the zoning application and associated variance requests submitted by St. Laurence Church to expand their Parrish Hall. The Church has been an outstanding member of Southlake's community for years and, as one of our closest neighbors on Kimball Avenue,we look forward to working with them to enhance the look of our entire community. We are confident this application does just that! Regards i Je rey Medici Managing Partner Medici Development Partners, LLC Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 9 Public Comment Cards— May 5, 2016 Plannin_g & Zonin_g Commission Meetin_g Southlake Planning& Zoning Commission Meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name• I� T-4L Date: Address: 2 Z J� C,DTS �L� V ��.0 GS91 Phone: 6) (Include City and State) ❑ I wish to share my A ws on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#7 _I will speak in SUPPORT of this item AI will speak in OPPOSITION to this item do not wish to speak,but please recd d my _SUPPORT _OPPOSITION ❑ Citizen Comments(for an item on this agenda) Signature: Required. Cards w l of be rear! to he record unless It is signed Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Public Comment Form Please print, Return completed form to Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: '-"•)c— U V S `� Date: Address.2-22R CCS S w C �1 Phone:--7-7 0 r YC)(O Address: City and State) ❑ I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: / Agenda Item#--LO _I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item ✓I do not wish to speak,but please recprd my SUPPORT V/ OPPOSITION ❑ Citizen Comments(for an item on this agenda) Signature: Required. Cards will not be read into the record unless It is signed Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 10 Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 11 Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: m A o U se—jr Date: Address: 22 2-cA C0 ~ O\U v 0-)\e Phone: a 1 '4 „ (Include City and State) v �(Q�T� ❑ I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# )0 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item ✓I do not wish to speak,but please repord my SUPPORT ✓ OPPOSITION ❑ Citizen Comments(for an item on this agenda) Signature: / Required. Cards will not be read Into the record unless!t Is signed Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: Cl C, Date: 1 Phone Address: 7iZ �� -L� (Include City and State) '-7 ❑ I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#i I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my �,y SUPPORT OPPOSITION LJ Citizen Comments(for an item on this agenda VU Signature: Required: Cards will not b read into the record unless it Is signed Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 12 Public Comment Cards— May 17, 2016 City Council Meeting Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print_. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name:� 1{�/ p£;!'l Date: Address:4 W M K i'm baJ l Ave_ Phone S1 t7- �✓ (Include City and State) SjI wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Ager Item#q ,,will � ill speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSPTION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSMON ❑ I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: NOW To eAow nwyort�u oppoftnity to be beard,please lbwlt yow consneels to 3 minutes. Signature: / Required: Cords will no$be read boo the record calm h is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form }Pleasee'print. Returncompleted form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: �J e � T pr /a f—►1 M e 1� _ Date: / Address: 2—C? 4a N' k: -,,ta1t �Cakt Phone: f/7-Ti 3 -z 27r; (Include City and Slane) lid"I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#�� I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION ❑ I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic:_ _ Now To ellow e► -opporbudWWbe kesr4 pieose b1nk your com gents to 3 minutm Signature: Required: Cards will not be read biro Me record out is signed Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 13 Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form P print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: v' '•� Date:!;) //!o Address: /1/L'��f.I� / � �" Phone: . (Inc! City and 9fatef I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#�I I will speak in SUPPORT of this item T I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION ❑ I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note.,To allow tvtrywne qrq oppornusity to be heard,please tbrdt your comments to 3 minutm Signature: Requlred: Car&will not be read/w the record unim d h s4ned Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. 1 Name: �D RQ }C n —_-- Date: 17-_�(o Address: 1311 WE5 MIM+ Cbyf L SdJ+4.)A-kt-,-rx Phone: ?IM21-238'7 ( (Include City and State) t "I I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item 47F I will speak in SLTPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION ❑ I wish to speak during Public Foram on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note.-To allow eroyone an opportunity to be heard,please!lmlt yrnu comments to 3 minurGm Signature: ej Required. Cards will not be read the record miden Signed Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 14 Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please pdnL Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: /h �/�y�� Date: 5— 7116 Address: �/C L, Phone:a (Include City and State) 15�0Li7W 41?6 7—X 24,0 9�4 ❑ I wisb to share my vie«-,on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# 71- V/1 will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item _I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION ❑ I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note:To allow everyone an opporlunhy to be Heard, Eitsdt your comments to 3 mdAuus. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the re dun kis signa Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session.S Name: 11�51/� �r t✓i�d wS Date: ^ �-7 Address: r 13 'BIL44 tion-( 9 saw,;(10/k -t)r Pbone: SS4,'!V (Include City and State) kwish to share my views on an Agenda Item: �n Agenda Item#-F we—j U l UVCh X I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: _ Note_To sUaw everyone ms opporhunfty,to be beard,please knelt your comments to 3 minutom signature:.(�;A�- a _ Required: Cards wiO not be read into the record unless it is signed Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 15 Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form I Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session.y , Name: Z44" ei ae � _ Date: ?" 7 Address: "0�0 L Sim!804,'P, ,) OCf/f rl� Phone: 7 (Include City and State) LU I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#y— 5t, ("�I u r em u will speak in SUPPORT of this item _I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION FeI I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonigh 's agenda Topic: sf, Lq or_"6t <.hu* Note.-To allow awyone an opporrunhy to be rd,please um t y r convmenls to 3 mimics. Signature: 1 y A Required: Cards wX not be read into the record anless his signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. 15 Name: 0, a,S Date: — 1 Address: Z so V"� �At Phone: (include City wui State) — — - - ---— — vi •lsh to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#�� V 1 will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my El SUPPORT _OPPOSITION L! I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Now To allow everyone are opportrrnity to be heard,please limit roar commmn to 3 ndnutm Case h Sifinatun: "� ment F ZA16-C Required. Cards will be read the record unless it is signed rage 16 Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary}mor to start of regular session. Name: G.d 2 e L. �Q'P/�J�Q — Date:_Sl�-6 Address: / s'Z HCA7NERgA2-,0*. a7- SL TX 74 6172 Phone: F/7 749ed/6- (Include City and State) LJ I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item 4-7—F V"'I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION ❑ I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Notr. To allow everyone an opponu IV to be heard please timh your commmo to_1 minutes. Signature: --- .. Required: Cards will not be read int the record unless ft h.slgneb Southlake City Council meeting r a.yQ 5 Public Comment Form �1� Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to of regular session. p'cu Name: n { i 4\;�r G✓ Address: GLA' W-Tr a_; 1 Phone:X31 �d 1 (Irrclude City and State) `+ (rJ I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: �J{ Agenda Item it _will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION ❑ I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: _ f Note:To allow n eryone an opportxnfry to be heard,please 13ni[ eonewasls to 3 '7 Case N invent F Signature: ZA164 Required: Ca will not be read inw the record unless It is signed Page 17 Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: �i�Y4 �.(� Mow k A e, Date: Address:12^ I�. i� � Phone: =1gm-n ) (Include Ciry and State) r ❑ I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item 4 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION ❑ I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: ,Vote:To alloyy we an opportunity to be heard,please lindtyvur commend to 3 mLnuld Signature: Required. Car will not be r—ea&Mfo the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: '14506 L;IWLk r- Date:s/17114 Address: 1;4 I T`'1-c r UeAn IIa Phone: L ,J� (In elude City and Stat CI wish to share my vieon an Agenda Item: Agenda Item it I A 1 will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item ✓I do not wish ty speak,but please record my ✓SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda 'fopic: Case � ,Note:To allow everyone an poruatkN to be heard please llmlt your commend to 3 minuus. meat F ZA16-( age 18 Signature;: _ Requdrad.• Cards not be read beto the record unless 11 is signed ! Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return complete rrm to/City,Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: +► � l�i �fl! 1 I U Date: Address: O� j f'N1 t�i{i `tom 14- Phone: VInclude City and State) sh to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item 4-7r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item speak in OP SITION to this item do not wish t but please record my rr�� SUPPORT _OPPOSITION ElI wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note:To allowan oppo to be heard �i�iprr c to 3 n&inw m Sigmaturc: Required: Cards W 9 not be tato the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: /-11-(At Date: 15-)7 -//a Address: 16LI +3fLM 0AAT MACE t 1W S 4 VT1ILA_KL-- -r)( Phone: '317 310 3T-1; (Include City and State) ❑ I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item 4 1 F I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSMON ❑ I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Case N Nute:To allow evenwne an oppo to be h ptcase A** consne-nn to 3 minutr_c. iment F ZA16-0 gage 19 Signature: Regwbred: Cards will not be read Wo the unless tt&signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name:_ �h.A ✓I Q �✓L'1 SE2 -- Date:��l 7 G Address: R ZS S o-rte✓1 15✓ 7,t'-Z-. , S. f.'7W"1e-5 1je Phone: "R17 fro 7 nclude City and State) LJ I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#-IE I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item o not wish to s but please record my _LZSn UPPORT OPPOSITION l J I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic:. _ ._ Note.To allow everyone an oppo7f 1r�E heard,�H nN yow cont me to 3 mkuws. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name:__J,_n/ S`�nIE Date: -5S-f7--Z<91(- Address: S-f7-Z016Address: lebf K4a4,-&S Aet�-F � ��C ��o�`� Phone: (Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#7F I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my n ,X SUPPORT OPPOSITION l _J I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Case I Topic: ment F ZA16-1 vote:To allow everyone an opportunity to be htard tose Mm0your convnena to 3 mbuaes. age 20 Signature: -_ g Required.• Cards wW not be read bw fire record unless it is signed. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-716 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED TRACT 5A04A, SAMUEL FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 525, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY .94 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN /SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as"AG"Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be Case No. Attachment G ZA16-015 Page 1 granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off- street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a Case No. Attachment G ZA16-015 Page 2 change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Tract 5A04A, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas being approximately .94 acres, and more fully and completely described in exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "CS" Community Service District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan/Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following conditions: Reserved for City Council motion SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs,sentences,words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the Case No. Attachment G ZA16-015 Page 3 community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by Case No. Attachment G ZA16-015 Page 4 this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1St reading the 17th day of May, 2016. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 7th day of June, 2016. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Case No. Attachment G ZA16-015 Page 5 CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: EXHIBIT "A" Being described as Tract 5A04A, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, City of Southlake, Tarrant Case No. Attachment G ZA16-015 Page 6 County, Texas being approximately .94 acres, and more fully and completely described below: RESERVED FOR METES AND BOUNDS EXHIBIT "B" RESERVED FOR APPROVED EXHIBITS Case No. Attachment G ZA16-015 Page 7 Case No. Attachment G ZA16-015 Page 8