Item 8 ZA16-029
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
May 13, 2016
CASE NO: ZA16-029
PROJECT:Zoning Change and Development Plan for the Carillon Corporate District
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
On behalf of Hines Southlake Land, LP, Jacobs Engineering, Inc. is requesting
approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from ‘ECZ’ Employment
Center Zoning District to ‘ECZ’ Employment Center Zoning District to amend
the approved Carillon Development Plan layout for the Corporate District and to
allow a hotel as a permitted use in the District on approximately 15.36 acres
located between the 200 and 400 block of E. State Hwy. 114, being
approximately 1,100 feet east of the northeast corner of E. State Hwy. 114 and
SPIN Neighborhood # 3
N. White Chapel Blvd. Southlake, Texas.
DETAILS:
Jacobs Engineering Inc. is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and
Development Plan from ‘ECZ’ Employment Center Zoning District to ‘ECZ’
Employment Center Zoning District to amend the approved Carillon
Development Plan layout for the Corporate District and to allow a hotel as a
permitted use in the district. The applicant is proposing the following
amendments to the ‘ECZ’ zoning regulations for the Corporate District. All other
aspects of the district are to remain unchanged.
Proposed amendments to the ‘ECZ Zoning District
1. Amend the permitted uses to allow a hotel as a permitted use in the
Corporate District. The hotel height maximum is 100’ as indicated in the
Plaza District restrictions. The hotel architectural design is to generally
conform to the Hotel-specific Plaza District requirements in the ECZ zoning.
2. Redefine the parking standards for the Hotel use based on 1.2 spaces per
hotel room.
3. Revise the Development Plan to incorporate a Hotel use along S.H 114 and
to remove the Plaza Street ‘C’ connection to S.H. 114.
4. Amend the zoning to allow loading zones at the front entrance.
Case No.
ZA16-029
The following two development plans shown below are a comparison of the
changes to the Corporate District:
Original Corporate District (November 2008)
Proposed Corporate District (May 2016)
Carillon Corporate District
The following information is from the Carillon Master Plan approved by City
Council in November of 2008:
The Corporate District is comprised of primarily office with the opportunity for
additional retail or commercial uses. A 25 foot landscape buffer and a 50 foot
building setback is adjacent to S.H. 114. In addition, a 20 foot landscape buffer
Case No.
ZA16-029
is proposed along Kirkwood Boulevard and the parkway to the north of the
Corporate District.
This request is being processed in conjunction with a Site Plan for Hotel Indigo-
Carillon, a four story office building, under Planning Case ZA16-029.
VARIANCE
REQUESTED:
A variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2(d),
requiring a stacking depth of 75’ for both driveways on the proposed hotel site,
is requested to allow approximately 20’ of stacking depth on the west driveway
and approximately 25’ of stacking depth on the east driveway.
ACTION NEEDED:1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) SPIN Report dated March 22, 2016
(D) Plans and Support Information – Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(E) Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 13, 2016
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(G) Full Size Plans (for Commissioners and Council Members only)
STAFF CONTACT:
Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA16-029
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER:
Hines Southlake Land, LP
APPLICANT:
Jacobs Engineering, Inc.
Located between the 200 and 400 block of E. State Hwy. 114,
PROPERTY SITUATION:
being approximately 1,100 feet east of the northeast corner of E.
State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd
Tracts 3B2 and 3B and a portion of Tract 3A1, Larkin H. Chivers
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Survey, Abstract No. 300
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING:
“ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District
PROPOSED ZONING:
“ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District
HISTORY:
-On November 18, 2008 the City Council approved a Zoning Change
and Development Plan from ‘NR-PUD’ Non-Residential Planned Unit
Development and ‘C-2’ Local Retail Commercial District to ‘ECZ’
Employment Center Zoning District for Carillon under Planning Case
ZA08-031 (Ordinance No. 480-564).
- On April 20, 2010 the City Council approved a Site Plan for the
Children’s Medical Center at Southlake under Planning Case ZA10-017.
CITIZEN INPUT:
A SPIN meeting was held on March 22, 2016 for the Hotel Indigo –
Carillon, which included some discussion of the proposed amendment
to the ‘ECZ’ corporate District zoning. A copy of the SPIN Report is
included in Attachment C of this report.
The 2035 Corridor Planning Committee discussed the Site Plan for
Hotel Indigo – Carillon at their May 10, 2016 meeting. Please see the
staff report for case number ZA16-030 for a copy of the meeting report
on that item.
SOUTHLAKE 2030:Consolidated Land Use Plan
The Southlake 2030
Future Land Use
Plan designates this
property as Mixed
Use. The Mixed Use
land use designation
is defined within
Southlake 2030 as
the following:
“The range of
activities permitted,
the diverse natural features, and the varying proximity to thoroughfares
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-029 Page 1
of areas in the Mixed Use category necessitates comprehensively
planned and coordinated development. New development must be
compatible with and not intrusive to existing development. Further,
special attention should be placed on the design and transition between
different uses. Typically, the Mixed Use designation is intended for
medium- to higher-intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial
activities, retail centers, and residential uses. Nuisance-free, wholly
enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses that have no outdoor
storage are permitted if designed to be compatible with adjacent uses.
Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open
Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density Residential, Medium Density
Residential, Retail Commercial, and Office Commercial categories
previously discussed.”
Urban Design Plan
The Urban Design Plan also includes a few recommendations pertaining
to the State Highway 114 corridor where this site is proposed to be
located. They are as follows:
Establish appropriate scale and bulk standards for buildings along
o
the highway, specifically at mid-block locations. Buildings should be
4 – 6 stories tall and step down as they move away from the
highway corridor. Buildings over three stories should be articulated
along the first three floors. Materials on the lower floors should be
brick, stone or other approved masonry. Low-profile, single story pad
buildings that tend to blend into the background and have limited
visibility from the highway are discouraged
The view of surface parking from the highway should be limited.
o
Surface parking lots should be designed to be in smaller pods (no
more than 200 parking spaces) with increased landscaping and
pedestrian accessways.
Structured parking is encouraged over surface parking. Specifically,
o
shared parking is also encouraged between adjoining
complementary land uses. Special attention should be given to the
design of parking garages to avoid plain facades with views of
parked cars from adjoining properties and rights-of-ways. Façade
details, vertical and horizontal courses such as cornices, lintels, sills,
and water courses should be used to add interest along facades. To
the extent possible, parking garages should be located behind
principal structures to limit views from the highway.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENTArea Road Network and Conditions
:
The proposed hotel development will have two points of access onto
Carillon Court.
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was conducted in May of 2008 during the
initial proposal of the master planned Carillon development. Since its
approval an addendum was done in March of 2010 during the proposal
of Children’s Medical Center to address the reduction of approximately
94,000 square feet of office/retail uses and an addition of 70,000 square
feet of a medical center use. The Conclusions and Recommendations
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-029 Page 1
from the 2008 TIA in addition to an approval letter from the Texas
Department of Transportation (TxDOT) can be found under Attachment
‘D’ of this report.
STAFF COMMENTS
: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 13, 2016.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-029 Page 1
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-029 Page 1
SPIN Meeting Report
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-029 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-029 Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-029 Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-029 Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-029 Page 5
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-029 Page 6
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-029 Page 7
Plans and Support Information
Variance Request Letter
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-029 Page 1
Revised Development Plan
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-029 Page 2
Revised Pages for Zoning Booklet
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-029 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-029 Page 4
CONCLUSIONS FROM ORIGINAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-029 Page 5
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-029 Page 6
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-029 Page 7
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA16-029 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 05/13/16
Development Plan
Project Name: – Carillon – Hotel Indigo
APPLICANT: Kevin Kessler OWNER: Jeff Kennemer
Jacobs Engineering Hines Southlake Land LP
1999 Bryan St. Suite 1200 2200 Ross Ave. Suite 4200W
Dallas, TX Dallas, TX
Phone: (214) 920-8106 Phone: (972) 716-2900
E-mail: kevin.kessler@jacobs.com E-mail: jeff.kennemer@hines.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY
ON 05/02/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602 OR DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-
8072.
1. The proposed Indigo Hotel Site Plan must conform to the underlying ‘ECZ’ Zoning and
Development Plan for Carillon.
2. The materials on the hotel elevations are not labeled. Please ensure that the materials
proposed for the hotel are permitted façade materials in the Carillon regulations.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* The proposed Tree Conservation Plan shows to preserve existing trees that were previously
shown to be removed on the Carillon Tree Conservation Plan. The property contains
approximately 52% of existing tree cover and if this was straight zoning 50% of the tree cover
would be required to be preserved. A total of 17% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be
preserved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of
existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the
minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-029 Page 1
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City
Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer
residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction
of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved
on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and
the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all
structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be
constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
*
A color-coded Landscape Plan meeting the requirements of Landscape Ordinance No. 544-A
is required for approval of the Site Plan.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-029 Page 2
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
New Requirement:
2. Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan
must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake
especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan
to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly
recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including
one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls
during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always
equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for
SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the
installation and removal of controls.
civil construction plans.
NEW REQUIREMENT:
3. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared
by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
5. Construction within SH 114 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit
application prior to site plan approval.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
* Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
* Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be
found in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
EASEMENTS:
Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is
required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
* Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of
way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be
constructed to City standards.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-029 Page 3
WATER COMMENTS:
1. Minimum size for water lines is 8”.
2. All water line stubs must have 2 joints past the valve with a 2” blow-off per the City’s details.
* Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way.
* The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc.
* Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
* Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
3. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8”. Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public
sanitary sewer system built to City standards.
4. Proposed sanitary sewer shall be located in parkway - not under pavement, except for
crossings.
5. Add a note: Private sanitary sewer services need a plumbing permit and must be inspected by
building inspections prior to burial.
* Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Clearly label all private and public storm lines.
2. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer
must be installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement
requirements for storm sewer:
30” RCP and under - 15’ easement
42” – 54” RCP - 20’ easement
60” – 66” RCP - 25’ easement
72” – 102” RCP - 30’ easement
Over 102” RCP – 3.5 times diameter
* Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets.
* Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City
standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-029 Page 4
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines
pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH
114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans
directly to TxDOT for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817)
748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Assistant Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located
on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet
from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of
5’X5’ if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser.
The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire
hydrant. (A remote FDC is acceptable to meet the requirement)(FDC not shown on plans)
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn
radius. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4)
Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, a minimum of
24 feet wide with 6 inch red striping that contains 4 inch white lettering that states “FIRE LANE
NO PARKING” every 25 feet, and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A
minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Label all fire lanes.
General Informational Comments
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-029 Page 5
* A SPIN meeting was held on March 22, 2016.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480-564A.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
65
* It appears that this property lies within the LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and
will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use
Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480-564A.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must
be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street
Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-029 Page 6
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
Carillon Corporate District
SPO# Owner Name Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 250 E SH 114 3.62
1. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 100 E SH 114 5.06
2. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 200 E SH 114 1.04
3. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 190 E SH 114 1.27
4. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 240 E SH 114 0.74
5. NR
DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 101 E SH 114 0.40
6. NR
DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 201 E SH 114 0.08
7. NR
DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 1350 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 6.33
8. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 400 E SH 114 0.06
9. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 430 E SH 114 0.53
10. NR
DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 301 E SH 114 2.70
11. NR
DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES C3 319 E SH 114 2.86
12. NR
BIEKER, RON ECZ 1621 RIVIERA LN 0.12
13. NR
MCCAW, NEIL ECZ 1617 RIVIERA LN 0.12
14. NR
RUCCI, COREY ECZ 1613 RIVIERA LN 0.12
15. NR
BOISSEVAIN, DAVID ECZ 1609 RIVIERA LN 0.12
16. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES - DFW LLC ECZ 1601 RIVIERA LN 0.21
17. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES - DFW LLC ECZ 1605 RIVIERA LN 0.12
18. NR
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-029 Page 1
PERRY, RICHARD B ECZ 308 MONTPELIER DR 0.13
19. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 300 CARILLON CT 0.15
20. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 1500 LE MANS LN 0.20
21. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 400 CARILLON CT 1.46
22. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 401 MONTPELIER DR 0.19
23. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 301 MONTPELIER DR 0.19
24. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 303 MONTPELIER DR 0.15
25. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 305 MONTPELIER DR 0.16
26. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 307 MONTPELIER DR 0.14
27. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 1508 LE MANS LN 0.14
28. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 1504 LE MANS LN 0.14
29. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES-DFW LLC ECZ 300 MONTPELIER DR 0.24
30. NR
PATEL, TEJAL ECZ 304 MONTPELIER DR 0.15
31. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES-DFW LLC ECZ 306 MONTPELIER DR 0.13
32. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 833 ORLEANS DR 0.07
33. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 1700 N CARROLL AVE 20.94
34. NR
DEORA, JITENDRA ECZ 829 ORLEANS DR 0.25
35. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 1513 LE MANS LN 0.14
36. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 1509 LE MANS LN 0.18
37. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES - DFW LLC ECZ 1505 LE MANS LN 0.24
38. NR
MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS LLC ECZ 817 ORLEANS DR 0.19
39. NR
MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS LLC ECZ 821 ORLEANS DR 0.19
40. NR
CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ECZ 470 E SH 114 9.80
41. NR
K HOVNANIAN HOMES DFW LLC ECZ 1501 LE MANS LN 0.33
42. NR
HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 629 ORLEANS DR 0.54
43. NR
MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS LLC ECZ 825 ORLEANS DR 0.18
44. NR
SOUTHLAKE TX MEDICAL BLDG I LP SP2 431 E SH 114 2.70
45. NR
SOUTHLAKE LAND HOLDINGS LP SP2 451 E SH 114 2.73
46. NR
SOUTHLAKE LAND HOLDINGS LP SP2 401 E SH 114 1.88
47. NR
SOUTHLAKE LAND HOLDINGS LP SP2 335 E SH 114 15.09
48. NR
F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent:
Forty-Eight (48)
Responses Received:
None (0)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-029 Page 2