Item 6 ZA16-027
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
May 13, 2016
CASE NO:ZA16-027
PROJECT:Zoning Change and Site Plan for S. H. 114 & Blessed Way
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
Integrated Real Estate Group is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site
Plan for S. H. 114 & Blessed Way on property described as Tract 2C, Richard Eads
Survey, Abstract No. 481 and Tracts 5E, 5C1 and 5D1, Thomas Mahan Survey,
Abstract No. 1049, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1680,
1700, 1730 and 1750 E. State Highway 114, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning:
"AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan
District. SPIN Neighborhood #4.
DETAILS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan from “AG”
Agricultural District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District for a mixed use
development consisting of two three-story office buildings totaling approximately
105,140 square feet, two four-story senior housing buildings totaling 283
independent and assisted living units and one three-story parking garage on
approximately 20.5 acres.
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning “AG” – Agricultural District
Proposed Zoning “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
Land Use Designation Mixed Use
Gross/Net Acreage 20.5
Main Building Floor Area (Gross) 861,740 sq. ft.
Office 57,827 sq. ft.
Medical Office 47,313 sq. ft.
Senior Living 554,994 sq. ft.
Parking237,206 sq. ft.
Buildings No. of Floors -
Office Building 1 3
Office Building 2 3
Independent Residential 4
Assisted/Independent Residential4
Parking Garage No. of Levels 3
Open Space % 48%
Impervious Coverage % 52%
Total Parking Required (S-P-1) 792
Parking Garage Spaces Provided 423
Surface Parking Spaces Provided 439
Total Parking Spaces Provided 862
Case No.
ZA16-027
VARIANCES
REQUESTED:
1) Variance allowing relief from the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended,
Section 8.01(A) requiring that every lot abut on a public or private street. The
applicant is requesting a variance to allow Common Access Easements for
access to all lots.
2) Variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2(d)
requiring a minimum stacking depth of 150’ to allow a stacking depth of
approximately 120’ for the entrance from the S. H. 114 frontage road.
3) Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2(c) prohibits driveways onto
collectors and local streets unless the tract or lot has no other access. The
applicant is requesting a variance to allow an entrance driveway onto Blessed
Way.
4) Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended, requires that at least 80% of each
facade (excluding windows and doors) be covered with a masonry material.
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the percentage of masonry on
the senior housing buildings as shown on the elevations.
ACTION NEEDED:1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) SPIN meeting Report dated May 10, 2016
(D) Corridor Planning Committee Report dated March 21, 2016
(E) Plans and Support Information – Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 12, 2016
(F)
(G) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
for Commission and Council members only
(H) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA16-027
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER:
Chesapeake Land Development Company, LLC
APPLICANT:
Integrated Real Estate Group
PROPERTY SITUATION:
1680, 1700, 1730 and 1750, E. State Highway 114, generally located
northeast corner of E. State Hwy. 114 and Blessed Way
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Tract 2C, Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481 and Tracts 5E, 5C1 and
5D1, Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING:
“AG” – Agricultural District
HISTORY:
The property was annexed into the City in 1956 and 1957 and given the
“AG” Agricultural District zoning designation.
There is no development history on the property.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN:
Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2030 future land use designation for the site is Mixed Use.
The purpose of the Mixed Use designation is to provide an option for large-
scale, master-planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses
such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses.
The range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the
Mixed Use
varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the category
necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New
development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing
development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design and
transition between different uses.
Mixed Use
Typically, the designation is intended for medium- to higher
intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and
residential uses. Nuisance-free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and
assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be
compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted
Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density
in the
Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, Office
and
Commercial
categories.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows E. S.H. 114 to be a
variable width freeway and Blessed Way to be a local street. Adequate right
of way is shown on the Site Plan.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows a Future Multi-Use Trail (≥8’) along S.H.
114 and an existing sidewalk Blessed Way. The Pedestrian Access Plan
shows a 10’ Multi-use Trail is along S. H. 114 and an 8’ sidewalk along
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-027 Page 1
Blessed Way. There is an existing 6’ sidewalk along Blessed Way. The
minimum width required for a sidewalk on a local street adjacent to
commercial development is 5’.
Major Corridors Urban Design Plan
The following recommendations pertain to private development along S.H.
114:
Preserve existing natural view corridors where appropriate.
Specifically, tree stands along the highway should be preserved
when they terminate views from the highway.
In order to maximize regional access and limit the impact of strip
retail development, retail and restaurant development should be
concentrated at interchanges in 1-2 story buildings with higher
intensity office and institutional uses at mid-block locations.
Establish appropriate scale and bulk standards for buildings along
the highway, specifically at mid-block locations. Buildings should be
4 – 6 stories tall and step down as they move away from the
highway corridor. Buildings over three stories should be articulated
along the first three floors. Materials on the lower floors should be
brick, stone or other approved masonry. Low-profile, single story
pad buildings that tend to blend into the background and have
limited visibility from the highway are discouraged.
All windows on buildings should be vertically oriented and be
articulated with a 4-inch reveal to avoid solid, flat walls, and to
create shadow lines and surface texture. Glass curtain walls and
facades with more than 60% glass along any elevation shall be
discouraged. Along retail store fronts, 1’ – 2’ high knee walls shall
limit the amount of glass along each façade visible from public
streets.
The view of surface parking from the highway should be limited.
Surface parking lots should be designed to be in smaller pods (no
more than 200 parking spaces) with increased landscaping and
pedestrian accessways.
Structured parking is encouraged over surface parking. Specifically,
shared parking is also encouraged between adjoining
complementary land uses. Special attention should be given to the
design of parking garages to avoid plain facades with views of
parked cars from adjoining properties and rights-of-ways. Façade
details, vertical and horizontal courses such as cornices, lintels,
sills, and water courses should be used to add interest along
facades. To the extent possible, parking garages should be located
behind principal structures to limit views from the highway.
All developments greater than 10 acres should be broken up into
blocks which can provide easy circulation by cars, people and
emergency vehicles, and which interconnect with adjacent
properties where possible. This will also facilitate reinvestment and
possible redevelopment in future years.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-027 Page 2
Master planning of larger tracts or multiple tracts is encouraged over
piece-meal development. In addition, the master plan applications
should include all the elements of the built environment such as
building design, site design, wayfinding and building signage,
landscaping, treatment of natural features, bridges, streets, street
lighting, etc. Every effort should be made to incorporate
recommended urban design elements into the project design.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed development will have one access driveway onto E. State
Hwy. 114 and one access driveway onto Blessed Way.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for this development. The
Executive Summary from the TIA is included in Attachment ‘E’ of this report.
E. S.H. 114 Frontage Rd. (5W)
(between Kimball Ave. and Carroll Ave.)
24hr
West Bound (6113)
AM Peak AM (482)
Peak PM (598)
PM
Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
*
Traffic Impact
AM-PM-
Use Area/Units Vtpd* AM-IN PM-IN
OUT OUT
Office (710) 57,827 s.f. 636 79 11 15 71
Medical Office (720) 47,313 s.f. 1709 113 58 84 126
Independent Senior
233 811 7 7 14 12
Living (252)
Assisted Living (254) 50 133 6 3 8 9
Total 3289 205 79 121 218
Vehicle Trips Per Day
*
* AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
th
* Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 Edition
TREE PRESERVATION:
There is approximately 80.6% existing tree cover on the site. If this was a
straight zoning case, the minimum percentage to be preserved per Tree
Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D would be 30%. For property sought to be
zoned S-P-1 Detailed Site Plan District, the City Council shall consider the
application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application. The applicant is proposing to
preserve approximately 30.8% of the existing tree cover.
UTILITIES:
The site will connect to a 12” water line in S. H. 114 and an 8” water line in
Blessed Way. The site will connect to a 12” sanitary sewer line in Blessed
Way.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development:
A SPIN meeting was held for this project on May 10, 2016. A copy of the
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-027 Page 3
report for this meeting can be found under Attachment ‘C’ of this staff
report.
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on March 21, 2016.
A copy of the report for this meeting can be found under Attachment ‘D’ of
this staff report.
STAFF COMMENTS
: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 13, 2016.
The criteria for granting variances to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended, and the Masonry Ordinance no. 557, as amended, are below.
Variance criteria in Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended:
In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal
enforcement of the regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship
or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing
unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property
and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly
compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties,
and the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and
purpose of this ordinance. The decision of the city Council shall be final.
Variance criteria in Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended:
In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal
enforcement of the regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship
or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing
unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property
and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly
compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties,
and the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and
purpose of this ordinance.
The terms and conditions of the variance, if granted, shall be noted by
minute order. In the event that a variance application is denied by the City
Council, no other variance of like kind shall be considered or acted upon by
the City Council upon the same building or proposed building for a period of
six (6) months subsequent to said denial.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-027 Page 4
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-027 Page 1
SPIN MEETING REPORT
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-027 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-027 Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-027 Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-027 Page 4
2035 CORRIDOR PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-027 Page 1
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-027 Page 2
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-027 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-027 Page 4
NARRATIVE LETTER
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 1
S-P-1 REGULATIONS AND VARIANCE REQUEST LETTER
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 2
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 3
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 4
SITE PLAN
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 5
ELEVATIONS – 1680 SH 114
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 6
ELEVATIONS – 1680 SH 114
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 7
ELEVATIONS – Independent Living
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 8
ELEVATIONS – Independent / Assisted Living
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 9
GARAGE ELEVATIONS
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 10
LANDSCAPE PLAN – Lot 1
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 11
LANDSCAPE PLAN – Lots 2-5
LANDSCAPE PLAN – Lot 6
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 12
LANDSCAPE PLAN – Lot 7
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 13
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
Existing Tree Cover - 80.6%
Proposed % of existing cover to be preserved – 30.8%
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 14
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 15
LEE ENGINEERING REVIEW OF TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 16
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 17
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-027 Page 18
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA16-027Two05/05/16
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Site Plan
Project Name: – SH 114 and Blessed Way
APPLICANT: Paul Milosevich OWNER: Michelle Miller
Integrated Realty Group Chesapeake Land Development Co., LLC
3110 W. Southlake Blvd. Ste. 120 6100 N. Western Ave.
Southlake, TX 76092 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118
Phone: (817) 742-1851 Phone: (405) 935-2037
E-mail: pmilosevich@integratedreg.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
05/02/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. A Preliminary Plat must be processed and approved by City Council following a
recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission and a Final Plat must be processed,
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and recorded with the County prior to
issuance of a building permit.
2. Staff recommends providing color perspective views from S. H. 114.
3. Please provide a material sample board with all the materials shown on the elevations.
4. Please make the following changes to the Site Plan:
a. Label the dimensions of each wall length on all buildings.
5. Please make the following changes to the elevations:
a. Please provide area and percentage calculations of each façade material excluding
windows and doors. Provide only one summary for each façade.
b. Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended, requires that at least 80% of each facade
(excluding windows and doors) be covered with a masonry material. The composite
siding and metal panels on the senior housing buildings are not considered masonry
materials. A variance has been requested.
c. An S-P-1 regulation has been added to allow the elastomeric coating as a masonry
material on the office buildings.
d. Add a written scale under the graphic scale.
6. Please make the following changes to the cross sections for the 4:1 setback from residential:
a. The cross section does not appear to be correct. The building is over 50’ in height at the
southeast corner of the building, which would require a setback of 200’ minus the 6’
height of the starting point of the slope line. The distance from the property line is shown
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-027 Page 1
at 169.7’ on the Site Plan. Please verify that no portion of the east facade of the building
on Lot 6 encroaches into that area, and if it does, revise the elevations to comply with
the 4:1 setback requirement or add an S-P-1 regulation to allow the encroachment as
shown on the cross section exhibits.
b. Please dimension the height of the building and the distance from the property line on
each exhibit and provide a written and graphic scale for each exhibit.
c. Prepare several cross sections of the east facade to capture the highest portions of the
building along the east side of the building.
7. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended). The following changes are needed:
a. A stacking depth of approximately 120’ is shown on the SH 114 drive and 150’ is
required. A variance request letter requesting a variance to Driveway Ord. No. 634, as
amended, Section 5.2(d) has been submitted. The driveway on Blessed Way appears to
meet the minimum required 150’ stacking depth.
b. Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2(c) prohibits driveways onto collectors
and local streets unless the tract or lot has no other access. Please submit a variance
request letter to allow the driveway onto Blessed Way.
c. Dimension and label the distance between the proposed driveway centerline and the
centerline of the driveway for Lot 1R, Brewer Industrial Addition.
8. Clearly designate the location and size of all parking stalls intended for off-street loading. Use
hatching to designate the loading spaces. Show, label and dimension the required 2 loading
spaces for each of the office lots. One loading zone has to be a minimum of 10’ x 50’ and the
other zone must be a minimum of 10’ x 25’. The loading spaces on lots 3 and 5 are also labeled
as trash compactors. The loading spaces cannot have a trash compactor in them, so please
relocate the loading spaces and/or trash compactors so that they don’t overlap. An S-P-1
regulation has been added to allow one loading space on each office building lot. Clearly show
the walls and gates of the trash receptacle enclosures.
9. It is unclear how trucks would turn around in the service drive for Lot 3. Be prepared to explain
how the trucks would enter and exit that service area.
10. A minimum 8’ screening device meeting the requirements of Ordinance 480, Section 39 is
required along all boundaries abutting single family residential property. An 8’ board on board
wood fence is shown along the east property line of Lot 6 to meet this requirement, but the
fence must extend the entire length of the Lot 6 boundary. Please revise the Fence/Entry
Feature Plan to show the 8’ board on board fence extending along the entire eastern boundary
of Lot 6.
11. Please change the label for a typical parking space on the southern portion of Lot 6 from
“parking garage (typical)” to “parking space (typical)”.
12. The Pedestrian Access Plan shows an 8’ sidewalk along Blessed Way. There is an existing 6’
sidewalk along Blessed Way. The minimum width required for a sidewalk on a local street
adjacent to commercial development is 5’. Please clarify if the existing sidewalk will be
widened, or, if the plan intends to show the existing sidewalk to remain as it is, please revise
the width to 6’.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-027 Page 2
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. Please label every tree on the Tree Conservation Plan with a number that corresponds to the
numbers on the Tree Survey. The digital copy of the Tree Survey that was provided will not open,
so please provide a useable copy.
* Based on the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Calculations the proposed development does
comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation
Ordinance. The site contains approximately 80.6% tree cover and 30% of that tree cover is
required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 30.8% of the total tree cover on
the site.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover
that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application
for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application
(as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application
and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall
approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as
to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature
tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-027 Page 3
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Place the Bufferyards Summary Chart for each lot on each of the Lot Landscape Plans.
* The interior landscape and bufferyards are correct. The applicant is proposing to take existing tree
credits on each lot for existing trees proposed to be preserved on the lots and within the open
space areas.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
No comments
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Assistant Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet. (Per 2012
I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-027 Page 4
A dry standpipe system shall be required for the parking garage if the distance from the lowest
level of fire department access is in excess of 150 feet to reach all portions of the parking
garage.
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on
the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the
main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the
double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser.
The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system and parking garage standpipe must be
within 100 feet of a fire hydrant. (A remote FDC is acceptable to meet the requirement)(FDC
locations not shown on plans)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
An additional fire hydrant will be required for building 3 to meet the minimum fire flow
requirements as listed in table C105.1 in the 2012 International Fire Code. (Appendix C)
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn
radius. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4)
Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide
and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW)
Community Service/Parks Department Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
817-748-8607
pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting
fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for
further details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of
park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development.
Non-residential park dedication fees in the amount of $2400 per gross acre x approximately 7 acres=
$16,800 will be required. This is approximate because acreage for Lots 2 and 3 not provided in submittal.
Fees will be collected with the approved developer’s agreement or prior to any permit being issued.
Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of
park land for every forty (40) dwelling units.
Residential park dedication fees in the amount of $3000 per dwelling unit x (121+112= 233) dwelling units
=$699,000 will be required. Assisted living units are considered commercial.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-027 Page 5
Total park fee dedication amount is approx.. $16,800 + $699,000 = approx. $715,800.00
Pathway Comments:
Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian
access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide
4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and
Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility
requirements.
Other informational comments?
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting was held for May 10, 2016.
* Sidewalks and/or trails are provided compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as
amended and the Master Pathways Plan. The required ≥8’ multi-use trail is shown along SH
114. A minimum 5’ sidewalk is required along Blessed Way and a 6’ sidewalk exists.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
65
* It appears that this property lies within the LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use
Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones except as noted in the S-P-1 regulations.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-027 Page 6
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SH 114 & Blessed Way Senior Housing
SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acreage Response
1. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1430 DIVISION ST 2.55 NR
2.
F
MC PROPERTIES INC SP1 1940 E SH 114 1.14
3. H D DEVELOPMENT
NR
PROPERTIES LP C3 1695 E SH 114 0.20
4. HD DEVELOPMENT
NR
PROPERTIEX LP C3 300 VILLAGE CENTER DR 11.60
5. BTH & RA ASSOCIATES INC MF1 400 BRIARWOOD DR 0.54 NR
6. CHESAPEAKE LAND DEV CO LLC AG 1680 E SH 114 3.09 NR
7. GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 700 BLESSED WAY 82.01 NR
8. CHESAPEAKE LAND DEV CO LLC AG 1730 E SH 114 8.08 NR
9.
NR
CHESAPEAKE LAND DEV CO LLC AG 1700 E SH 114 1.11
10.BROWN, RONNI SF1-A 600 BRIARWOOD DR 1.27 NR
11.SOUTHLAKE BREWER
NR
PARTNERS LLC B1 1800 E SH 114 2.42
12.BRIARWOOD TOWNHOMES LP MF1 420 BRIARWOOD DR 0.57 NR
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-027 Page 1
13.DRIGGERS, RANDALL D SF1-A 450 BRIARWOOD DR 1.06 NR
14.CHESAPEAKE LAND DEV CO LLC AG 1750 E SH 114 7.84 NR
15.KHONCARLY, HICHAM SF1-A 550 BRIARWOOD DR 1.05 NR
16.OJO, OLUWASANJO J SF1-A 500 BRIARWOOD DR 1.07 NR
17.S T I C LLC SP1 1910 E SH 114 0.34 NR
18.S T I C LLC SP1 1900 E SH 114 0.57 NR
19.SC SOUTHLAKE MEDICAL LLC SP1 1920 E SH 114 0.56 NR
20.GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 701 BLESSED WAY 34.29 NR
21.SHAMROCK PIPELINE CORP,
F
THE C3 1689 E SH 114 0.41
22.SLTS LAND LP DT 1651 E SH 114 5.33 NR
23.FECHTEL, JOE EST - 1778 SH 114 0.08 NR
24.FECHTEL, JOE EST - 1774 E SH 114 0.25 NR
F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent:
Twenty-one (21)
Responses Received within 200’:
Two (2) – Attached
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-027 Page 2
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-027 Page 3
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-027 Page 4