Loading...
Item 9A BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICANT: Burger Shack /TVS Company PROPERTY SITUATION: 410 W. Southlake Boulevard, Suite 160 HISTORY: September 2006 — sign variance approved for Bicentennial Plaza (SP06-362) which included conditional regulations for maximum letter height; number of signs; and minimum monument setback. City Council granted the three requested variances but noted that other than the variance on the letter heights, the attached signage would meet all other regulations of the existing sign ordinance and requiring the monument signs be brought back to City Council for separate approval. April 2008 —development monument signs approved by Council March 2009— permanent attached sign permitted for Fat Daddy's May 2010 — additional attached sign/logo permitted for Fat Daddy's approved under SV10-007. June 2012 — permanent attached signs permitted for Burger Shack approved under SV12-008. SIGN BOARD: May 5, 2016; Approved (4-1) subject to the staff report dated April 29, 2016 and specifically approving Option 1. STAFF COMMENTS: The sign criteria and application are attached to this report. N:ACommunity Development\MEMO\Signs\Conditional Sign Permits\Bicentennial Retail Plaza\SV16-007-Another Broken Egg CafeACC Packet\Item 9A.docx Case No. Attachment A SV16-007 Page 1 Vicinity Map Another Broken Egg 285 O g RD) d �EDOM ON �a 2 260 222 500480 40 �W U`[t1LA �eu 0. 40 475 465 445 425 351 0 0 102 435 'o NQ� 14f) 11 rl 11.19 19P IIA v)n 116 119 lt)A J � ❑O Q'" 104 ti SV16-007 Sign Variance s'-�•� 0 300 600 1.200 Feet Case No. Attachment B SV16-007 Page 1 Site Plan ANV W O N8IMS SYMOM $ Y ge g ��? e10 LNH9fa0ZHn9a v 3 "s S€ j� �� � svxa€vazxonalnos a a aG �� i ass s= w 7tlINN31N3�l9G �€� 9 moi x S lug RIM Hili. I;I JN't It 61, MEN � I I i I .. �� HARIQ HDNVd LN9 Rh m -g $°s SRldd'IdINI1HJN3�lfl �� I; 1a b9iw�5 ems! f �g�� g a f 61 �I li I � I W Case No. Attachment C SV16-007 Page 1 Proposed Signs Option 1 South Elevation — Facing Southlake Boulevard 59-2"LEASE LINE i 25-10 34{+h} I i ROOF - - -+ LINE 'IIs y OPTION 91 PHOTO SURVEY- PROPOSED SCALE:3132"=1-0" FRONT BLDG ELEVATION TRANSLUCENT DIGITAL PRINT APPLIED TO j WHITE ACRYLIC 2025 SQ.FT. III I !I OPAQUEBA KROUND - PTD.TO MA CH FASCIA - - ---_ __.-----.--------- --._ -_.L� COLOR OF BUILDING I (SN#6095) ' °��r�l■1rJ !I 20.90$0.FT. -- '� --- -- --aur.- ------------! --- --_-- - _---_---------.-.---� n7 n i .� !I m ._._._. 35.125(;!.FT. N I ! _._.-._.--'-'-'-'--'-'-._.-_._.-._.- . 4'-10" OPTION 0 4'-6"V-PCL RACEWAY SCALE:318"=T-0" ONE(1)REQUIRED-MNJUFACTURE AND INSTALL 86.0 SQ.FT. Case No. Attachment C SV16-007 Page 2 Proposed Signs Option 2 South Elevation — Facing Southlake Boulevard 50-2LMA"ll r 25-10'/.'(+1-) �T t Ell OPTION PHOTO SURVEY- PROPOSED SCALE:3M'=1'-0 FRONT BLDG.ELEVATION V-4 718' r-1�� -_ 7RANSLUCLr,1 uI il.�L -- ------ LI L u I L� __- 82 SO.FT. RRIJ7 APP WHITE ACRru;: 0 Ev SACUND PO TO MA CHHFFASC lA COLOR OF 91JILDING ---- ---- ---- (9va 60®5) o —__-- 8.4 SO.FT. —__-- _-- - - 142=FT- -- r - -- --------- - 39 S4 FT. 9-a5w OPTION SOX-10"V-PCL RACEWAY SCALE 318-=1'-O- ONE(1)REQUIRED-MANUFACTURE AND INS7ALL 35 SO.FT. Case No. Attachment C SV16-007 Page 3 Proposed Signs Option 3 South Elevation — Facing Southlake Boulevard 50'-2"LEASE LINE 2540 3T i 0 r i I ---------------------- ---------------_ I ROOF LINE e i • ro b 1 l i uuyy ii I i L - OPTION PHOTO SURVEY- PROPOSED SCALE:3;32•=r-X FRONT BLDG. ELEVAPON 5'8• TRANSLUCENT DIGITAL PRNTAPPNEOTO vAi RE ACRYLIC �p so.1r SO.Fr. P..T. "'10 PTO.TO.41ASCIA OOLOR OF 9UILOINe OQ—__ IV*wtal _ � ---- --- AV 27.61 94.F7. Mwwl I--- Q Q j 32.494.FT. 146694 Fr 9-11 s43• OPTION © 5'-6"V-PCL RACEWAY scALe sra•=1-a• ONE(1)REQUIREC-MANUFAOTUREANOINSTALL 124.9794.FT. Case No. Attachment C SV16-007 Page 4 Proposed Signs Option 1 North Elevation — Facing Internal Driveway 50--z'LEASE LINE 2X-1 G' ROOF LINE PHOTO SURVEY - PROPOSED SCALE:30T 1'.0' REAR BLDG.ELEVATION OPAQUE RACKROUND TRANSLUCENT DIGITAL T-4' IM 70 MATCH FASCIA PRM APPLIED TO 1 COLOR OF alil Lf)ING VM TE ACRY1JC0095) 14-ISSMFT_ 2221 M.FT. 11.11 M.Fr. OPT ON 0 TA"H-PCL- RACEWAY SCALE:1 IC m V-0: ONE(1)REURED-MMLFACnAW-AND INSTALL 47.50 SQ.FTFtEnMMUNLE77ERSARE 050 Mui PFIE-RMHrD CUMTMlCTIDH M.EROME Case No. Attachment C SV1 6-007 Page 5 Proposed Signs Option 2 North Elevation — Facing Internal Driveway I 0--2'LEASE LIME I { 20'-10' i -FK" _ ~a N ❑F`-IOY 3_ PHOTO SURVEY - PROPOSED SCALE adz'=r-V REAR BLDG-ELEVATION ORAQLIP PICKROLJND 19-0313' P17D.70 MA7CH FASCIA COLOR OF BULQING 2-10 lie 11'-11 18* (S%W sb95) 7RANQ I1[FFJT o1GHi4L— 11.SQ FT, PrUNT APPLMD 70 --- — — --- WIiIE AQkYUr- LH• Ioa- 16.1 $a F7.1 a.iso.FT. 1 11'-7 W OPTION El 2'-70" H-RCL - RACEWAY SCALE-,Vir 1'-0• ONE(1)REOLA RE❑-MANUFACTURE AND MTALL S5 SQ.FT. IIEn>INS on Lern A40ALLDL PIFIF-M Case No. Attachment C SV16-007 Page 6 Proposed Signs Option 3 North Elevation — Facing Internal Driveway sd-r ups!LWE 20•-1(-1.4-1 �I-- >�_ pt" 'a M6 ----—----— :-;MEOW_ OFWN El PHOTO SURVEY - PROPOSED 8O&E Wr-1'-0' REAR BLDG. ELEVATION OPAQUE BACKROL44D 2d-1 W PTU.TO MATCH FAX LA COLOR TRANSLUCENT DIWAL I 3'-9314' 19-9314' VQ GY6 LLUIhIG PRYJTAPPLITD TD V i rEAcmruc IgbgSMFT- i * ► -4 I "' I 4w / 4WA 4 a 14-M SQ FT- 295q.FT. 15'7• OPf10N 4 © 0 ONE FFPCL-RACEWAY scALE:3e•.r-0• JZQALFtMr*4a+5-MISP..nc 81.72 SQ-FT. acouu�raarN ONE(7I RE4LXR ED-MaNU FACTURE AND INSTALL CGB$-MI1C7I0I1 LIM.WONZE Case No. Attachment C SV16-007 Page 7 Previously Approved Burger Shack Signs MN7r wrth F.tc[cuntiuc�o us: BURGER 33" SHACK BURGER SHACK I'M ZOO i r \ I � i f I J � ----------- - Gi: I• ��i-� _ROOF i - LINE_.._ s ---------- ---------- --------------------------------- ------------ -----------------------18" { Tim R= Fl! r~ r - Case No. Attachment C SV16-007 Page 3 Application Demonstration Please demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to the requested sign variance: 1.) That a literal enforcement of the sign regulation will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. At the 34 square feet that is allowed by city code the sign would not be visible causing customer to not be able to locate their establishment given that the building sits more than 125' off of the road. 2.) That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. The fagade that the sign is going on is one of the larger facades in the shopping center giving our sign the appearance of being smaller. We want to make sure the sign looks proportional in the space that it is going. Also the building sits more than 125' off of the road. 3.) That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. I believe increasing the size of the sign will help with safety because the sign will be seen from farther away giving a chance for people to signal and turn with enough time to alert the people behind them. Also, The Shack also had to go for a variance and was able to get their signs approved. 4.) That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. Yes, a majority of our sign follows the shopping center sign criteria. Case No. Attachment D SV16-007 Page 1