Item 9 & 10 - St. Laurence Church Presentation
Items 9 & 10
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CP16-003)
& Zoning Change and Concept Plan /
Development Plan (ZA16-015)
CP16-003 & ZA16-015
APPLICANT:KirkmanEngineering
REQUEST:1) Approval of a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment from Medium Density Residential
to Public / Semi-Public for Tract 5A04A at 549
N. Kimball Ave. (CP16-003)
2) Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site
Plan to expand St. Laurence Episcopal
Church (ZA16-015)
LOCATION:517 and 549 N. Kimball Ave.
CP16-003
Proposed: Public / Semi-Public
Existing: Medium Density Residential
CONCEPT PLAN / SITE PLAN & SITE DATA SUMMARY
Phase I (Site Plan):
-New Parish Hall
-Expansion of
Existing Fellowship
Hall
-Proposed
Improvements
CONCEPT PLAN / SITE PLAN (ZA16-015)
Concept Plan:
-Future
Expansion
CONCEPT PLAN / SITE PLAN (ZA16-015)
TREE CONSERVATION PLAN
BOUNDARY / TOPOGRAPHIC / TREE SURVEY
LANDSCAPE PLAN
New
Parish
Hall
(Right)
Expansion of
Existing
Fellowship
Buildings Included in Site Plan (Above)
Hall (Left)
FLOOR PLAN (PARISH HALL & FELLOWSHIP HALL)
Expansion of
New
Existing
Parish
Fellowship
Hall
Hall
Expansion of
Existing
Fellowship
Hall
SOUTH ELEVATION (EXPANSION OF FELLOWSHIP HALL)
New Parish
Hall
SOUTH ELEVATION (NEW PARISH HALL)
Fellowship Hall Expansion
New Parish Hall
WEST ELEVATION (VIEW FROM N. KIMBALL)
EXISTING WEST ELEVATION (FELLOWSHIP HALL EXPANSION)
New Parish
Expansion of Existing
Hall
Fellowship Hall
NORTH ELEVATION
Fellowship Hall ExpansionNew Parish Hall
EAST ELEVATION
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS PLAN
GRADING PLAN
PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP
UTILITY PLAN
1.Zoning Ord. 480 (43.13.a.8) Setbacks/Yards: No non-single family residential building may encroach in the area above a
line having a slop of 4:1 from any single-family residential property. The proposed parish hall to the north encroaches
in the 4:1 slope at a maximum of approximately 15’. The Applicant has requested a variance to not meet this
requirement.The horizontal setback needed to meet this requirement for the proposed Parish Hall is
approximately 96 feet from the north boundary line. The applicant is requesting a variance for an 83-foot
setback.
2.Driveway Ord. 634 (5.2.d) Minimum Storage Length: 75’ required. The applicant proposes a storage (stacking) depth
of 26’
3.Zoning Ord. 480 (39.6) Perimeter Screening: Where a non-residential use abuts a residentially zoned lot or tract having
an occupied residential dwelling, a solid fence meeting the material standards of section 39.2(b) shall be erected along
the side and rear property lines abutting said residential lot or dwelling to a height of eight (8) feet. The applicant is
requesting to not provide screening meeting these requirements along the north, east and south sides of the
property, but instead use existing vegetation as screening
4.Minimum Distance to Intersection Along Roadway: Driveway Ord. No. 634 requires a minimum distance to intersection
along arterial roadway to a commercial or multi-family driveway of 200’ On the Concept Plan / Site Plan the applicant is
showing a distance of 180’ from the centerline of the proposed driveway to the north to the ROW line of Cotswald Valley
Ct. The applicant proposes a 180’ distance
5.Bufferyards: The applicant is requesting a variance for the west and south bufferyardto encroach into the
existing parking/paving area
6.Bufferyards: The applicant is requesting a variance to the bufferyardsrequirement to reallocate the required
landscape items (canopy trees, accent trees and shrubs) from the buffer yards along the south and eastern most
property lines to the north and west property lines
7.Zoning Ord. 480 (43.19.d.1.c.i) Horizontal Articulation: The applicant will require a variance in order to not meet
horizontal articulation requirements per Non-Residential Development Overlay Development regulations
VARIANCES
Questions?
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY
EAST PROPERTY LINE
THE MOST EASTERLY NORTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY
SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
WEST PROPERTY LINE ALONG N. KIMBALL
NORTH PROPERTY LINE –BORDER WITH ESTANCIA (COTSWALD VALLEY)