Item 10 - St. Laurence Church
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
April 29, 2016
CASE NO: ZA16-015
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan for St. Laurence Church
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
On behalf of St. Laurence Church, Kirkman Engineering is requesting approval of a
Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan to rezone a tract to the north of the
existing church site from “AG” Agricultural District to “CS” Community Service District,
and expand the existing church site by adding a new 9,680 square foot Parish Hall,
remodeling and adding 2,100 square feet to the existing Fellowship Hall, and adding
parking spaces at St. Laurence Church located at 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave.,
Southlake, Texas. The current zoning is “AG” Agricultural District and “CS” Community
Service District. SPIN Neighborhood #4.
REQUEST
DETAILS:
St. Laurence Church is requesting approval of a Zoning Change from “AG” Agricultural
District to “CS” Community Service District on vacant Tract 5A04A located at 549 N.
Kimball Ave. St. Laurence Church has existing facilities on Lot 1R to the south located
at 517 N. Kimball Ave. St. Laurence Church is proposing a multi-phased concept plan
and a site plan to expand the existing site by adding a new 9,680 Parish Hall,
remodeling and expanding the existing Fellowship Hall and adding parking.
This application runs concurrently with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CP16-
003), a request to change the Future Land Use from Medium Density Residential to
Public / Semi-Public on Tract 5A04A to the north of the existing church site. If
approved, the Future Land Use for the church site would be consistently Public / Semi-
Public.
The applicant has also submitted a Plat Revision application (ZA16-028) to revise the
existing Lot 1R to include Tract 5A04A. The proposed Lot 1R1 contains 6.467 acres.
VARIANCES
REQUESTED:
1) Zoning Ord. 480 (43.13.a.8) Setbacks/Yards: No non-single family residential
building may encroach in the area above a line having a slop of 4:1 from any
The proposed parish hall to the north
single-family residential property.
encroaches in the 4:1 slope at a maximum of approximately 15’. The
Applicant has requested a variance to not meet this requirement. The
horizontal setback needed to meet this requirement for the proposed Parish
Hall is approximately 96 feet from the north boundary line. The applicant is
requesting a variance for an 83-foot setback
.
The
2) Driveway Ord. 634 (5.2.d) Minimum Storage Length: 75’ required.
applicant proposes a storage (stacking) depth of 26’
.
3) Zoning Ord. 480 (39.6) Perimeter Screening: Where a non-residential use
Case No.
ZA16-015
abuts a residentially zoned lot or tract having an occupied residential dwelling,
a solid fence meeting the material standards of section 39.2(b) shall be
erected along the side and rear property lines abutting said residential lot or
The applicant is requesting to not
dwelling to a height of eight (8) feet.
provide screening meeting these requirements along the north, east and
south sides of the property, but instead use existing vegetation as
screening
.
4) Minimum Distance to Intersection Along Roadway: Driveway Ord. No. 634
requires a minimum distance to intersection along arterial roadway to a
commercial or multi-family driveway of 200’ On the Concept Plan / Site Plan
the applicant is showing a distance of 180’ from the centerline of the
The
proposed driveway to the north to the ROW line of Cotswald Valley Ct.
applicant proposes a 180’ distance
.
5) Bufferyards: The applicant is requesting a variance for the west and south
bufferyard to encroach into the existing parking/paving area.
:The applicant is requesting a variance to the bufferyards
6) Bufferyards
requirement to reallocate the required landscape items (canopy trees,
accent trees and shrubs) from the buffer yards along the south and
eastern most property lines to the north and west property lines.
The applicant will
7) Zoning Ord. 480 (43.19.d.1.c.i) Horizontal Articulation:
require a variance in order to not meet horizontal articulation
requirements per Non-Residential Development Overlay Development
regulations
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing
2) Consider Approval of Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Development
Plan Request
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 29, 2016
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) Ordinance No. 480-716
for Planning and Zoning Commission only
(H) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Jerod Potts (817) 748-8195
Case No.
ZA16-015
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER:
St. Laurence Church
APPLICANT:
Kirkman Engineering
PROPERTY LOCATION:
549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
: Tract 5A04A, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and Lot 1R, Block A,
Saint Laurence Episcopal Church Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County
Texas, located at 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas.
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Medium Density Residential / Public / Semi-Public
CURRENT ZONING:
“AG” Agricultural District and “CS” Community Service District
REQUESTED ZONING:
“CS” Community Service District
HISTORY:
517 N. Kimball
December 3, 1956 - This property was annexed into the City of Southlake
(Ordinance No. 17)
January 7, 1969 – City Council adopted Zoning Ordinance No. 161, which
designated this property as “AG” Agricultural District
December 15, 1987- City Council approved 2.8 acres to be rezoned (ZA87-
040) from "AG" Agricultural to "CS" Community Service
December 1, 1987 - City Council approved Preliminary Plat (ZA87-041) for
2.8 acres
January 19, 1988 - City Council approved a Final Plat (ZA87-049) for 2.8
acres
January 21, 1992 - City Council approved a SUP (ZA91-074) for a portable
building
September 16, 1997 - City Council approved a Zoning Change and Concept
Plan (ZA97-109) for 8.5 acres to be rezoned from "AG" Agricultural to "CS"
Community Service
September 2, 1997 - City Council approved a plat revision (ZA97-110) for
Lot 1R, Block A, Saint Laurence Episcopal Church Addition
July 27, 2000 - Zoning Board of Adjustment allowed a Variance to
Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.5.a (ZBA-351), to allow a church steeple
with a height of approximately seventy-five (75) feet measured from the
lowest grade
November 7, 2000 - City Council approved a Site Plan (ZA00-093)
October 20, 2009 - City Council approved a Site Plan (ZA09-040) for a
pergola
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-015 Page 1
549 N. Kimball
December 3, 1956 - This property was annexed into the City of Southlake
(Ordinance No. 17)
January 7, 1969 – City Council adopted Zoning Ordinance No. 161, which
designated this property as “AG” Agricultural District
According to TAD the single family residential structure that was located on
this home was built in 1955. Per applicant, the structure has been
demolished
CITIZEN INPUT:
To date, a SPIN Town Hall Forum has not been held
SOUTHLAKE 2030:
Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The Southlake 2030 Future
Land Use Plan designates
517 N. Kimball Ave. (south
portion of the site) as
Public / Semi-Public and
549 N. Kimball Ave. (north
portion of the site) as
Medium Density
Residential. The applicant
is proposing through
separate application a
Comprehensive Land Use
Plan amendment (CP16-
003) to change the future
land use designation on
the north portion of the site to Public / Semi-Public. The definition for Medium
The Medium Density Residential
Density Residential per Southlake 2030 says:
category is suitable for any single-family detached residential development.
Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space
and Public / Semi-Public categories previously discussed.
As proposed the
proposed Zoning Change and Concept / Site Plan for the church expansion is
consistent with the Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan designates this section of N. Kimball as an 88’
A4D (4-lane divided) arterial. ROW has been dedicated for 517 N. Kimball Ave.
(existing church site) and the applicant will dedicate ROW for 549 N. Kimball
Ave. by Plat Revision. The applicant has submitted a Plat Revision application
which is currently under review by City staff (ZA16-028).
Pathway Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Master Plan shows this section of N. Kimball Ave. as existing
sidewalks <8’. This site has a 6’ concrete sidewalk spanning the frontage of the
property boundary along N. Kimball Ave. This is consistent with the Pathways
Master Plan.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-015 Page 2
The site currently has access from N. Kimball Ave. According to the Concept /
Site Plan, one of the existing driveways along N. Kimball Ave. will be closed,
and a new driveway will be provided further north. There will be two (2) access
points into the church site from N. Kimball Ave.
Traffic Impact
Square AM-PM-
Use Vtpd* AM-IN PM-IN
Feet OUT OUT
Church (560) 27,696 252 11 9 10 8
* Vehicle Trips Per Day
* AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
th
* Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 Edition
UTILITIES:
Water
The utility plan shows a proposed fire hydrant on the east side of N. Kimball
Ave. with an 8” fire line to be added. The plan shows a new 2” domestic
service water line to connect to the existing 12” water main along N. Kimball
Ave.
Sewer
Sewer is provided to this site by a 12” gravity main on the west side of N.
Kimball Ave. The utility plan shows two existing (2) existing sanitary sewer
manholes on the west side of N. Kimball Ave and the plan shows a proposed
sanitary sewer manhole on the east side of N. Kimball Ave. The applicant is
proposing a 6” Private SSWR line from the existing manhole to the north and a
4” SSWR and 6” SSWR to serve the site.
TREE PRESERVATION:
According to the Tree Conservation Plan there is approximately 17.2% existing
tree canopy coverage at the site. The plan is showing that 87.9% of the
existing tree canopy coverage will be preserved. The applicant is required to
preserve a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover, which they exceed with
this plan.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 29, 2016
N:\\Community Development\\MEMO\\2016 Cases\\015 - ZSP - St. Laurence Church\\Staff Report\\ZA16-015 - PZ - 2016-05-05.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-015 Page 3
Case No. Attachment B
ZA16-015 Page 1
Plans and Support Information
Proposed Concept Plan / Site Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 1
Proposed Concept Plan / Site Plan Close-Up
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 2
Site Data
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 3
Summary Chart
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 4
Tree Conservation Plan – Close-up
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 5
Boundary / Topographic / Tree Survey – Close-up
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 6
Project Narrative and Variances
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 7
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 8
Overall Floor Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 9
(Left)
Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 10
Exterior Elevations – South Elevations
Color Rendering – South Elevations
Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left)
(Left)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 11
Exterior Elevations – West Elevation
Color Rendering – West Elevation
Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left)
(Left)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 12
Exterior Elevations – North Elevation
Color Rendering – North Elevation
Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left)
(Left)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 13
Exterior Elevations – East Elevation
Color Rendering – East Elevation
Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left)
(Left)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 14
Pedestrian Access Plan – Close-up
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 15
Grading Plan – Close-up
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 16
Proposed Drainage Map – Close-up
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 17
Utility Plan – Close-up
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 18
Landscape Plan – Close-up
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-015 Page 19
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA16-015Three4/29/16
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan
Project Name: – St. Laurence Church
APPLICANT: Kirkman Engineering OWNER: St. Laurence Church
Jonathan Schindler Father John Jordan
4821 Merlot Ave., Suite 210 519 N. Kimball Ave.
Grapevine, TX 76051 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 488-4960 Phone: (817) 481-3335
Email: jonathan.schindler@trustke.com Email: frjohnjordan@gmail.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/8/16 AND WE OFFER
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF ZONING CHANGE AND
CONCEPT / SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT JEROD POTTS AT (817) 748-8195.
Planning Review
Jerod Potts
Planner I
Phone: (817) 748-8195
Email: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us
1. Within the narrative:
a. Please clarify which phase specifically improvements will be completed. The narrative
currently states “All proposed improvements shown in this plan are to be constructed in
one phase.” Include which phase this refers to.
b. Update the narrative to reflect all variances being requested.
c. The first paragraph references the “existing fellowship call.” Please make this consistent
with other portions of the application.
2. On the Concept Plan / Site Plan:
a. Label the adjacent properties and properties across adjoining R.O.W.'s with owner's name,
Change the zoning on
existing zoning, and land use map designation ("L.U.D.=_____").
Lot 1, Block 1, Mesco Addition to “I-1” rather than “AG.”
b. The concept plan refers to “Future Expansion” and the Site Data Summary Chart refers to
“Phase 2.” Consider making these references to future site expansion consistent, including
in the project narrative.
3. Show and label all minimum building setback lines in accordance with the underlying zoning and/or
(i.e. Corridor, Residential Adjacency and Non-residential Overlays).
any applicable overlay district
Buildings must be setback such that no portion of the building encroaches above a 4:1 slope line
from a residential property line. However, one story buildings less than 20 feet in height may be as
close as 40 feet from the residential property line. If the building is over 20 feet in height
(measured from the highest adjacent grade within 5 feet of the building to the midpoint between
the roof peak and the plate) provide a cross sectional slope exhibit demonstrating compliance.
The proposed parish hall to the north encroaches in the 4:1 slope at a maximum of
approximately 15’. The Applicant has requested a variance to not meet this requirement.The
horizontal setback needed to meet this requirement for the proposed Parish Hall is
approximately 96 feet from the north boundary line. The applicant is requesting a variance
for an 83-foot setback.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-015 Page 1
4. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended).
a. The new driveway at the north end of the site needs to be a minimum of 200 feet from the
ROW of the street to the north. Verify that the distance is measured at the ROW line of the
The applicant has requested a
intersecting street to the centerline of the driveway.
variance to this requirement.
b. The minimum stacking depth required is 75 feet. (A variance with justification will be
The applicant has requested a variance to this requirement.
needed.
5. Provide a minimum 8’ screening device meeting the requirements of Ordinance 480, Section 39
along all boundaries abutting residentially zoned or designated property and any property zoned
“AG” having an occupied residential dwelling. This requirement appears to impact the north, east
The applicant has requested a variance to not meet this
and south boundaries of the site.
requirement.
6. Regarding the scaled elevations sheets:
a) Provide an elevation index that shows the perspective view in relation to the site plan for
each elevation.
b) Ensure that the color renderings match the scaled and dimensioned elevations shown on
the full-size plans.
i. The south elevation of the proposed new Parish Hall shows cut limestone veneer
on all of the drawings except one, where it appears to have been left out on the
color rendering (A3.3, 3).
ii. The north elevation of the proposed expansion of the Expansion of the Fellowship
Hall shows brick veneer between the expansion of the Fellowship Hall and the
proposed new Parish Hall, and the scaled elevation sheet shows this area as blank.
Please ensure these match (A3.2,2 and A3.4,2)
c) The combined elevations showing the proposed Fellowship Hall and Parish Hall appear to
meet the vertical articulation requirements, but none of the elevations appear to meet the
A variance will be required
horizontal articulation requirements. .
7. Show the location and method of screening of any mechanical equipment. Mechanical equipment
Applicant has indicated
must be screened of view from residential properties and adjacent ROW.
that mechanical equipment will be located on the roof.
8. Parking for a place of worship is based on seating capacity of the assembly areas based on a ratio
of 1 parking space per 3 seats. Please update the Site Data Summary Chart to accurately reflect
the number of required spaces. Based on a maximum seating capacity of 456, 152 spaces would
be required.
The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may benefit and
does not represent a requirement.
Staff recommends providing a materials sample board as part of any presentation to the P & Z and City
Council.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steven D. Anderson, P.E., CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
Fax: (817) 748-8077
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-015 Page 2
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
New Requirement:
2. Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must
include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially
reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution
(especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project
manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during
mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map
showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include
SWPPP shall be
timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls.
submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
NEW REQUIREMENT:
3. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet, if
applicable.
4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a
registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building
Inspections Department prior to construction.
5. Label the distances to the nearest drives or street intersections in both directions from the proposed
drive.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
* Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
* Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in
the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
EASEMENTS:
1.
Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
* Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All
waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City
standards.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the
Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The
plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes
which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-
construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-015 Page 3
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114.
Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to
TxDOT for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082
to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the
City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the
City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
Fax: (817) 481-5713
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. On previous Tree Conservation Plans the existing trees outside of the northeast corner of the north
parking were proposed to be preserved but the grading plan showed 3’ – 4’ of topography grade
change around them. On the most recently submitted Tree Conservation Plan the same trees are
shown to be removed in order to provide for the change in topography. The trees are quality trees that
are in good condition and can be easily preserved by constructing a retaining wall at the back of the
curb of the parking and access drive.
* The proposed tree conservation complies with the required Existing Tree Cover Preservation
Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The property has approximately 17.2% of existing
tree cover and 70% of that tree cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to
preserve 87.9% of the existing tree cover.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously
received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the
first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be
preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-015 Page 4
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public
rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved
Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved
by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities,
structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing
trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. The proposed building additions are greater in size than 5,000 square feet and/or 30% of the existing
buildings square footage. The entire property is required to comply with the Landscape Ordinance and
Bufferyards regulations of the Zoning Ordinance.
Existing buildings: Buildings in existence on the effective date of this ordinance shall be considered
legally nonconforming as it pertains to this ordinance. New construction greater in size than 30% of the
existing building or greater than 5,000 square feet shall require compliance with this ordinance as it
applies to the entire square footage of the existing building and proposed addition. New construction
intended to increase the square footage by less than 30% of the existing building or less than 5,000
square feet shall be required to meet the requirements herein only as it pertains to the square footage
of the new construction.
2. The interior landscape calculations are incorrect. The required interior landscape area and required
plant material shall be based on 30% of the footprint area of all existing and proposed buildings. The
required interior landscape area is 8,309 sq.ft., and the required interior landscape plant material is as
follows.
Canopy Trees – 17
Accent Trees – 33
Shrubs – 208
Ground Cover – 1,246 sq.ft.
Seasonal Color – 166 sq.ft.
3. Bufferyards are required to be provided along all property boundary lines. The applicant is proposing to
use the existing plant material to satisfy the requirements of the bufferyards landscaping.
Any existing plant material which otherwise satisfies the requirements of the bufferyard may be
counted toward satisfying all requirements as long as the existing plant material is in good health and
not altered during any phase of the proposed development or construction.
4. Parking lot landscape areas are the required and proposed landscape islands within the parking lot
areas and at the ends of rows of parking. These parking lot landscape islands are required to contain
at least one canopy tree with the rest of the area containing shrubs, ground cover, ornamental
grasses, seasonal color, or a combination of these plant materials. If the areas contain a light pole two
(2) accent trees and the remaining required plant material may be planted in place of the required
canopy tree. Provide the required plant material in each of the parking landscape island areas.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-015 Page 5
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
Fax: (817) 748-8181
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet and/or buildings
that have additions to the structure that cause it to exceed 6,000 square feet. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec.
903.2.11.9 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260,
Addison, Texas 75001. Phone 214-638-7599. (Fellowship hall addition causes the building to be in
excess of 6,000 square feet)
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser
if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser
is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a
minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per
2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50
feet of fire department fire lanes. (FDC locations not indicated on plans, add FDC locations, wall mount or
remote connection, and fire hydrants as necessary to meet requirements.)
Community Service/Parks Department Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
Phone: (817) 748-8607
Fax: (817) 748-8027
Email: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting
fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for
further details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre
of park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-015 Page 6
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, non-residential park dedication fees
in the amount of $2,400 per gross acre x 0.93 acres= $2,232.00 will be required. However, a credit of
$3000 for existing residential dwelling is allowed. Therefore, no park dedication fee is required.
Pathway Comments:
Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian
access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should
provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V
Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility
requirements.
Informational Comments:
* Staff strongly recommends contacting Daniel Cortez in the City Manager’s Office to determine if a
SPIN meeting would be beneficial to your application. Daniel can be contacted by phone at (817)
748-8029 or by e-mail at dcortez@ci.southlake.tx.us. For more information about SPIN and the
SPIN process please go to SouthlakeSPIN.org.
* There appears to be an existing 7.5’ UE along the north boundary of the existing church lot that will
need to be abandoned due to the proposed improvements. This can be done with the “Plat
Revision” that will be required for a building permit, subject to utility company and City Council
approval.
* Please note that the proposed standing seam metal roof must have a factory applied non-metallic
matte finish.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.13 is
required on the proposed buildings. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the
requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.13 on all facades within 400’ of a property zoned or
designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached
articulation evaluation chart.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of
The
lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. Show the type and height of all intended lighting.
applicant has included a note on the Concept Plan / Site Plan indicating that all lighting must
comply.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
65
* It appears that this property lies within the LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479 and execution of an avigation easement and release on the required plat
revision.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-015 Page 7
* Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall, stone, rock
or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be considered a
masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch
thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco finish with equal or greater
strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g., EIFS –exterior insulation and finish
systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry
material.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21,
Building Color Standards for Non-Residential Buildings.
* Tract 5A04A (549 N. Kimball Ave.) to the north of Lot 1R is unplatted. In order to obtain a building
permit for this portion of the property, a plat application must be submitted, reviewed, approved,
and recorded with Tarrant County.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-015 Page 8
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-015 Page 9
Surrounding Property Owners
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1 NR
579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2202 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.03170692
NR
2
579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2206 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.01170895
NR
3
579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2210 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.01029545
NR
4
579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2221 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 8.10500000
NR
5
AMWT SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 584 N KIMBALL AVE 0.46591389
NR
6
BABARIA, GORDHANBHAI H SF1-A 604 SHADY LN 0.97203979
NR
7
CHEN, SHANSHAN RPUD 2209 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.26550477
NR
8
CHU, EDWARD RPUD 2200 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.29978438
NR
9
CORP OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE FW AG 549 N KIMBALL AVE 0.93571468
NR
10
DOVE ROAD WATER ASSOC SF1-A 480 SHADY LN 0.01800000
NR
11
FABER, HOWARD S RPUD 2205 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.27790278
NR
12
IVESTER, EMORY O AG 501 N KIMBALL AVE 3.62300000
NR
13
JAMES, DAVID B SF1-A 600 SHADY LN 0.90237656
NR
14
JUNEJA, VIKAS RPUD 2201 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.29707209
NR
15
KIMBALL ROAD LP I1 500 N KIMBALL AVE 1.60990870
NR
16
LEE, K WAYNE SP2 566 N KIMBALL AVE 0.65935311
NR
17
MALONEY, RANDY C SF1-A 426 SHADY LN 2.00423953
NR
18
MALONEY, ROBBIE JOAN SF1-A 500 SHADY LN 0.91627575
NR
19
MDP SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 400 N KIMBALL AVE 6.13207159
ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO NR
20
LLC CS 550 N KIMBALL AVE 2.54920198
NR
21
PETERSON, ROBBIE JOAN SF1-A 504 SHADY LN 0.48430487
NR
22
SCHEIBEL, TRACY E SF1-A 516 SHADY LN 0.46765359
NR
23
SCHEIBEL, TRACY E SF1-A 520 SHADY LN 0.96975795
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-015 Page 1
NR
24
SCROGGINS, MARCUS L RPUD 2204 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.26334351
NR
25
SMITH, MICHAEL J RPUD 2208 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.28261017
NR
26
ST LAURENCE EPISCOPAL CHURCH CS 517 N KIMBALL AVE 5.58835122
NR
27
Superintendent of Carroll ISD
Superintendent of Grapevine NR
28
Colleyville ISD
NR
29
Superintendent of Keller ISD
NR
30
Superintendent of Northwest ISD
NR
31
TDC MANAAGEMENT LLC SP2 560 N KIMBALL AVE 0.48202137
NR
32
WANG, KUN RPUD 2213 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.29365074
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Responses Received: In Favor: () Opposed To: () Undecided: () No Response: ()
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-015 Page 2
Reserved for Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-015 Page 1
RESERVED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 480-716
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-015 Page 1