Loading...
Item 10 - St. Laurence Church Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T April 29, 2016 CASE NO: ZA16-015 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan for St. Laurence Church EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of St. Laurence Church, Kirkman Engineering is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan to rezone a tract to the north of the existing church site from “AG” Agricultural District to “CS” Community Service District, and expand the existing church site by adding a new 9,680 square foot Parish Hall, remodeling and adding 2,100 square feet to the existing Fellowship Hall, and adding parking spaces at St. Laurence Church located at 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas. The current zoning is “AG” Agricultural District and “CS” Community Service District. SPIN Neighborhood #4. REQUEST DETAILS: St. Laurence Church is requesting approval of a Zoning Change from “AG” Agricultural District to “CS” Community Service District on vacant Tract 5A04A located at 549 N. Kimball Ave. St. Laurence Church has existing facilities on Lot 1R to the south located at 517 N. Kimball Ave. St. Laurence Church is proposing a multi-phased concept plan and a site plan to expand the existing site by adding a new 9,680 Parish Hall, remodeling and expanding the existing Fellowship Hall and adding parking. This application runs concurrently with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CP16- 003), a request to change the Future Land Use from Medium Density Residential to Public / Semi-Public on Tract 5A04A to the north of the existing church site. If approved, the Future Land Use for the church site would be consistently Public / Semi- Public. The applicant has also submitted a Plat Revision application (ZA16-028) to revise the existing Lot 1R to include Tract 5A04A. The proposed Lot 1R1 contains 6.467 acres. VARIANCES REQUESTED: 1) Zoning Ord. 480 (43.13.a.8) Setbacks/Yards: No non-single family residential building may encroach in the area above a line having a slop of 4:1 from any The proposed parish hall to the north single-family residential property. encroaches in the 4:1 slope at a maximum of approximately 15’. The Applicant has requested a variance to not meet this requirement. The horizontal setback needed to meet this requirement for the proposed Parish Hall is approximately 96 feet from the north boundary line. The applicant is requesting a variance for an 83-foot setback . The 2) Driveway Ord. 634 (5.2.d) Minimum Storage Length: 75’ required. applicant proposes a storage (stacking) depth of 26’ . 3) Zoning Ord. 480 (39.6) Perimeter Screening: Where a non-residential use Case No. ZA16-015 abuts a residentially zoned lot or tract having an occupied residential dwelling, a solid fence meeting the material standards of section 39.2(b) shall be erected along the side and rear property lines abutting said residential lot or The applicant is requesting to not dwelling to a height of eight (8) feet. provide screening meeting these requirements along the north, east and south sides of the property, but instead use existing vegetation as screening . 4) Minimum Distance to Intersection Along Roadway: Driveway Ord. No. 634 requires a minimum distance to intersection along arterial roadway to a commercial or multi-family driveway of 200’ On the Concept Plan / Site Plan the applicant is showing a distance of 180’ from the centerline of the The proposed driveway to the north to the ROW line of Cotswald Valley Ct. applicant proposes a 180’ distance . 5) Bufferyards: The applicant is requesting a variance for the west and south bufferyard to encroach into the existing parking/paving area. :The applicant is requesting a variance to the bufferyards 6) Bufferyards requirement to reallocate the required landscape items (canopy trees, accent trees and shrubs) from the buffer yards along the south and eastern most property lines to the north and west property lines. The applicant will 7) Zoning Ord. 480 (43.19.d.1.c.i) Horizontal Articulation: require a variance in order to not meet horizontal articulation requirements per Non-Residential Development Overlay Development regulations ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Approval of Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Development Plan Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 29, 2016 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map (F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480-716 for Planning and Zoning Commission only (H) Full Size Plans () STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Jerod Potts (817) 748-8195 Case No. ZA16-015 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: St. Laurence Church APPLICANT: Kirkman Engineering PROPERTY LOCATION: 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Tract 5A04A, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and Lot 1R, Block A, Saint Laurence Episcopal Church Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County Texas, located at 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas. LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential / Public / Semi-Public CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District and “CS” Community Service District REQUESTED ZONING: “CS” Community Service District HISTORY: 517 N. Kimball December 3, 1956 - This property was annexed into the City of Southlake (Ordinance No. 17) January 7, 1969 – City Council adopted Zoning Ordinance No. 161, which designated this property as “AG” Agricultural District December 15, 1987- City Council approved 2.8 acres to be rezoned (ZA87- 040) from "AG" Agricultural to "CS" Community Service December 1, 1987 - City Council approved Preliminary Plat (ZA87-041) for 2.8 acres January 19, 1988 - City Council approved a Final Plat (ZA87-049) for 2.8 acres January 21, 1992 - City Council approved a SUP (ZA91-074) for a portable building September 16, 1997 - City Council approved a Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA97-109) for 8.5 acres to be rezoned from "AG" Agricultural to "CS" Community Service September 2, 1997 - City Council approved a plat revision (ZA97-110) for Lot 1R, Block A, Saint Laurence Episcopal Church Addition July 27, 2000 - Zoning Board of Adjustment allowed a Variance to Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.5.a (ZBA-351), to allow a church steeple with a height of approximately seventy-five (75) feet measured from the lowest grade November 7, 2000 - City Council approved a Site Plan (ZA00-093) October 20, 2009 - City Council approved a Site Plan (ZA09-040) for a pergola Case No. Attachment A ZA16-015 Page 1 549 N. Kimball December 3, 1956 - This property was annexed into the City of Southlake (Ordinance No. 17) January 7, 1969 – City Council adopted Zoning Ordinance No. 161, which designated this property as “AG” Agricultural District According to TAD the single family residential structure that was located on this home was built in 1955. Per applicant, the structure has been demolished CITIZEN INPUT: To date, a SPIN Town Hall Forum has not been held SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates 517 N. Kimball Ave. (south portion of the site) as Public / Semi-Public and 549 N. Kimball Ave. (north portion of the site) as Medium Density Residential. The applicant is proposing through separate application a Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment (CP16- 003) to change the future land use designation on the north portion of the site to Public / Semi-Public. The definition for Medium The Medium Density Residential Density Residential per Southlake 2030 says: category is suitable for any single-family detached residential development. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi-Public categories previously discussed. As proposed the proposed Zoning Change and Concept / Site Plan for the church expansion is consistent with the Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan designates this section of N. Kimball as an 88’ A4D (4-lane divided) arterial. ROW has been dedicated for 517 N. Kimball Ave. (existing church site) and the applicant will dedicate ROW for 549 N. Kimball Ave. by Plat Revision. The applicant has submitted a Plat Revision application which is currently under review by City staff (ZA16-028). Pathway Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan shows this section of N. Kimball Ave. as existing sidewalks <8’. This site has a 6’ concrete sidewalk spanning the frontage of the property boundary along N. Kimball Ave. This is consistent with the Pathways Master Plan. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions Case No. Attachment A ZA16-015 Page 2 The site currently has access from N. Kimball Ave. According to the Concept / Site Plan, one of the existing driveways along N. Kimball Ave. will be closed, and a new driveway will be provided further north. There will be two (2) access points into the church site from N. Kimball Ave. Traffic Impact Square AM-PM- Use Vtpd* AM-IN PM-IN Feet OUT OUT Church (560) 27,696 252 11 9 10 8 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday th * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 Edition UTILITIES: Water The utility plan shows a proposed fire hydrant on the east side of N. Kimball Ave. with an 8” fire line to be added. The plan shows a new 2” domestic service water line to connect to the existing 12” water main along N. Kimball Ave. Sewer Sewer is provided to this site by a 12” gravity main on the west side of N. Kimball Ave. The utility plan shows two existing (2) existing sanitary sewer manholes on the west side of N. Kimball Ave and the plan shows a proposed sanitary sewer manhole on the east side of N. Kimball Ave. The applicant is proposing a 6” Private SSWR line from the existing manhole to the north and a 4” SSWR and 6” SSWR to serve the site. TREE PRESERVATION: According to the Tree Conservation Plan there is approximately 17.2% existing tree canopy coverage at the site. The plan is showing that 87.9% of the existing tree canopy coverage will be preserved. The applicant is required to preserve a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover, which they exceed with this plan. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 29, 2016 N:\\Community Development\\MEMO\\2016 Cases\\015 - ZSP - St. Laurence Church\\Staff Report\\ZA16-015 - PZ - 2016-05-05.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA16-015 Page 3 Case No. Attachment B ZA16-015 Page 1 Plans and Support Information Proposed Concept Plan / Site Plan Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 1 Proposed Concept Plan / Site Plan Close-Up Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 2 Site Data Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 3 Summary Chart Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 4 Tree Conservation Plan – Close-up Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 5 Boundary / Topographic / Tree Survey – Close-up Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 6 Project Narrative and Variances Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 7 Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 8 Overall Floor Plan Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 9 (Left) Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 10 Exterior Elevations – South Elevations Color Rendering – South Elevations Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) (Left) Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 11 Exterior Elevations – West Elevation Color Rendering – West Elevation Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) (Left) Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 12 Exterior Elevations – North Elevation Color Rendering – North Elevation Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) (Left) Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 13 Exterior Elevations – East Elevation Color Rendering – East Elevation Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) (Left) Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 14 Pedestrian Access Plan – Close-up Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 15 Grading Plan – Close-up Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 16 Proposed Drainage Map – Close-up Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 17 Utility Plan – Close-up Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 18 Landscape Plan – Close-up Case No. Attachment C ZA16-015 Page 19 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ZA16-015Three4/29/16 Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review: Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan Project Name: – St. Laurence Church APPLICANT: Kirkman Engineering OWNER: St. Laurence Church Jonathan Schindler Father John Jordan 4821 Merlot Ave., Suite 210 519 N. Kimball Ave. Grapevine, TX 76051 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 488-4960 Phone: (817) 481-3335 Email: jonathan.schindler@trustke.com Email: frjohnjordan@gmail.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/8/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT / SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT JEROD POTTS AT (817) 748-8195. Planning Review Jerod Potts Planner I Phone: (817) 748-8195 Email: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us 1. Within the narrative: a. Please clarify which phase specifically improvements will be completed. The narrative currently states “All proposed improvements shown in this plan are to be constructed in one phase.” Include which phase this refers to. b. Update the narrative to reflect all variances being requested. c. The first paragraph references the “existing fellowship call.” Please make this consistent with other portions of the application. 2. On the Concept Plan / Site Plan: a. Label the adjacent properties and properties across adjoining R.O.W.'s with owner's name, Change the zoning on existing zoning, and land use map designation ("L.U.D.=_____"). Lot 1, Block 1, Mesco Addition to “I-1” rather than “AG.” b. The concept plan refers to “Future Expansion” and the Site Data Summary Chart refers to “Phase 2.” Consider making these references to future site expansion consistent, including in the project narrative. 3. Show and label all minimum building setback lines in accordance with the underlying zoning and/or (i.e. Corridor, Residential Adjacency and Non-residential Overlays). any applicable overlay district Buildings must be setback such that no portion of the building encroaches above a 4:1 slope line from a residential property line. However, one story buildings less than 20 feet in height may be as close as 40 feet from the residential property line. If the building is over 20 feet in height (measured from the highest adjacent grade within 5 feet of the building to the midpoint between the roof peak and the plate) provide a cross sectional slope exhibit demonstrating compliance. The proposed parish hall to the north encroaches in the 4:1 slope at a maximum of approximately 15’. The Applicant has requested a variance to not meet this requirement.The horizontal setback needed to meet this requirement for the proposed Parish Hall is approximately 96 feet from the north boundary line. The applicant is requesting a variance for an 83-foot setback. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 1 4. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). a. The new driveway at the north end of the site needs to be a minimum of 200 feet from the ROW of the street to the north. Verify that the distance is measured at the ROW line of the The applicant has requested a intersecting street to the centerline of the driveway. variance to this requirement. b. The minimum stacking depth required is 75 feet. (A variance with justification will be The applicant has requested a variance to this requirement. needed. 5. Provide a minimum 8’ screening device meeting the requirements of Ordinance 480, Section 39 along all boundaries abutting residentially zoned or designated property and any property zoned “AG” having an occupied residential dwelling. This requirement appears to impact the north, east The applicant has requested a variance to not meet this and south boundaries of the site. requirement. 6. Regarding the scaled elevations sheets: a) Provide an elevation index that shows the perspective view in relation to the site plan for each elevation. b) Ensure that the color renderings match the scaled and dimensioned elevations shown on the full-size plans. i. The south elevation of the proposed new Parish Hall shows cut limestone veneer on all of the drawings except one, where it appears to have been left out on the color rendering (A3.3, 3). ii. The north elevation of the proposed expansion of the Expansion of the Fellowship Hall shows brick veneer between the expansion of the Fellowship Hall and the proposed new Parish Hall, and the scaled elevation sheet shows this area as blank. Please ensure these match (A3.2,2 and A3.4,2) c) The combined elevations showing the proposed Fellowship Hall and Parish Hall appear to meet the vertical articulation requirements, but none of the elevations appear to meet the A variance will be required horizontal articulation requirements. . 7. Show the location and method of screening of any mechanical equipment. Mechanical equipment Applicant has indicated must be screened of view from residential properties and adjacent ROW. that mechanical equipment will be located on the roof. 8. Parking for a place of worship is based on seating capacity of the assembly areas based on a ratio of 1 parking space per 3 seats. Please update the Site Data Summary Chart to accurately reflect the number of required spaces. Based on a maximum seating capacity of 456, 152 spaces would be required. The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may benefit and does not represent a requirement.  Staff recommends providing a materials sample board as part of any presentation to the P & Z and City Council. Public Works/Engineering Review Steven D. Anderson, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 Fax: (817) 748-8077 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 2 GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. New Requirement: 2. Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include SWPPP shall be timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. NEW REQUIREMENT: 3. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet, if applicable. 4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. 5. Label the distances to the nearest drives or street intersections in both directions from the proposed drive. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’ minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. * Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre- construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 3 * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. On previous Tree Conservation Plans the existing trees outside of the northeast corner of the north parking were proposed to be preserved but the grading plan showed 3’ – 4’ of topography grade change around them. On the most recently submitted Tree Conservation Plan the same trees are shown to be removed in order to provide for the change in topography. The trees are quality trees that are in good condition and can be easily preserved by constructing a retaining wall at the back of the curb of the parking and access drive. * The proposed tree conservation complies with the required Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The property has approximately 17.2% of existing tree cover and 70% of that tree cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 87.9% of the existing tree cover. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the the entire site existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 4 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. The proposed building additions are greater in size than 5,000 square feet and/or 30% of the existing buildings square footage. The entire property is required to comply with the Landscape Ordinance and Bufferyards regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Existing buildings: Buildings in existence on the effective date of this ordinance shall be considered legally nonconforming as it pertains to this ordinance. New construction greater in size than 30% of the existing building or greater than 5,000 square feet shall require compliance with this ordinance as it applies to the entire square footage of the existing building and proposed addition. New construction intended to increase the square footage by less than 30% of the existing building or less than 5,000 square feet shall be required to meet the requirements herein only as it pertains to the square footage of the new construction. 2. The interior landscape calculations are incorrect. The required interior landscape area and required plant material shall be based on 30% of the footprint area of all existing and proposed buildings. The required interior landscape area is 8,309 sq.ft., and the required interior landscape plant material is as follows. Canopy Trees – 17 Accent Trees – 33 Shrubs – 208 Ground Cover – 1,246 sq.ft. Seasonal Color – 166 sq.ft. 3. Bufferyards are required to be provided along all property boundary lines. The applicant is proposing to use the existing plant material to satisfy the requirements of the bufferyards landscaping. Any existing plant material which otherwise satisfies the requirements of the bufferyard may be counted toward satisfying all requirements as long as the existing plant material is in good health and not altered during any phase of the proposed development or construction. 4. Parking lot landscape areas are the required and proposed landscape islands within the parking lot areas and at the ends of rows of parking. These parking lot landscape islands are required to contain at least one canopy tree with the rest of the area containing shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, seasonal color, or a combination of these plant materials. If the areas contain a light pole two (2) accent trees and the remaining required plant material may be planted in place of the required canopy tree. Provide the required plant material in each of the parking landscape island areas. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 5 Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 Fax: (817) 748-8181 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet and/or buildings that have additions to the structure that cause it to exceed 6,000 square feet. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001. Phone 214-638-7599. (Fellowship hall addition causes the building to be in excess of 6,000 square feet) The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes. (FDC locations not indicated on plans, add FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection, and fire hydrants as necessary to meet requirements.) Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager Phone: (817) 748-8607 Fax: (817) 748-8027 Email: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 6 If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, non-residential park dedication fees in the amount of $2,400 per gross acre x 0.93 acres= $2,232.00 will be required. However, a credit of $3000 for existing residential dwelling is allowed. Therefore, no park dedication fee is required. Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. Informational Comments: * Staff strongly recommends contacting Daniel Cortez in the City Manager’s Office to determine if a SPIN meeting would be beneficial to your application. Daniel can be contacted by phone at (817) 748-8029 or by e-mail at dcortez@ci.southlake.tx.us. For more information about SPIN and the SPIN process please go to SouthlakeSPIN.org. * There appears to be an existing 7.5’ UE along the north boundary of the existing church lot that will need to be abandoned due to the proposed improvements. This can be done with the “Plat Revision” that will be required for a building permit, subject to utility company and City Council approval. * Please note that the proposed standing seam metal roof must have a factory applied non-metallic matte finish. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.13 is required on the proposed buildings. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.13 on all facades within 400’ of a property zoned or designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of The lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. Show the type and height of all intended lighting. applicant has included a note on the Concept Plan / Site Plan indicating that all lighting must comply. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. 65 * It appears that this property lies within the LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479 and execution of an avigation easement and release on the required plat revision. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 7 * Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall, stone, rock or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be considered a masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g., EIFS –exterior insulation and finish systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry material. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21, Building Color Standards for Non-Residential Buildings. * Tract 5A04A (549 N. Kimball Ave.) to the north of Lot 1R is unplatted. In order to obtain a building permit for this portion of the property, a plat application must be submitted, reviewed, approved, and recorded with Tarrant County. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 8 Case No. Attachment D ZA16-015 Page 9 Surrounding Property Owners SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1 NR 579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2202 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.03170692 NR 2 579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2206 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.01170895 NR 3 579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2210 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.01029545 NR 4 579 KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2221 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 8.10500000 NR 5 AMWT SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 584 N KIMBALL AVE 0.46591389 NR 6 BABARIA, GORDHANBHAI H SF1-A 604 SHADY LN 0.97203979 NR 7 CHEN, SHANSHAN RPUD 2209 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.26550477 NR 8 CHU, EDWARD RPUD 2200 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.29978438 NR 9 CORP OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE FW AG 549 N KIMBALL AVE 0.93571468 NR 10 DOVE ROAD WATER ASSOC SF1-A 480 SHADY LN 0.01800000 NR 11 FABER, HOWARD S RPUD 2205 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.27790278 NR 12 IVESTER, EMORY O AG 501 N KIMBALL AVE 3.62300000 NR 13 JAMES, DAVID B SF1-A 600 SHADY LN 0.90237656 NR 14 JUNEJA, VIKAS RPUD 2201 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.29707209 NR 15 KIMBALL ROAD LP I1 500 N KIMBALL AVE 1.60990870 NR 16 LEE, K WAYNE SP2 566 N KIMBALL AVE 0.65935311 NR 17 MALONEY, RANDY C SF1-A 426 SHADY LN 2.00423953 NR 18 MALONEY, ROBBIE JOAN SF1-A 500 SHADY LN 0.91627575 NR 19 MDP SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 400 N KIMBALL AVE 6.13207159 ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO NR 20 LLC CS 550 N KIMBALL AVE 2.54920198 NR 21 PETERSON, ROBBIE JOAN SF1-A 504 SHADY LN 0.48430487 NR 22 SCHEIBEL, TRACY E SF1-A 516 SHADY LN 0.46765359 NR 23 SCHEIBEL, TRACY E SF1-A 520 SHADY LN 0.96975795 Case No. Attachment E ZA16-015 Page 1 NR 24 SCROGGINS, MARCUS L RPUD 2204 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.26334351 NR 25 SMITH, MICHAEL J RPUD 2208 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.28261017 NR 26 ST LAURENCE EPISCOPAL CHURCH CS 517 N KIMBALL AVE 5.58835122 NR 27 Superintendent of Carroll ISD Superintendent of Grapevine NR 28 Colleyville ISD NR 29 Superintendent of Keller ISD NR 30 Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR 31 TDC MANAAGEMENT LLC SP2 560 N KIMBALL AVE 0.48202137 NR 32 WANG, KUN RPUD 2213 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.29365074 Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Responses Received: In Favor: () Opposed To: () Undecided: () No Response: () Case No. Attachment E ZA16-015 Page 2 Reserved for Surrounding Property Owner Responses Case No. Attachment F ZA16-015 Page 1 RESERVED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 480-716 Case No. Attachment G ZA16-015 Page 1