Loading...
Item 7 - Stone Trail Estates Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T April 28, 2016 CASE NO: ZA15-152 PROJECT: Zoning Change & Development Plan for Stone Trail Estates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Terra/Manna, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Stone Trail Estates to develop 61 residential lots and 12 open space lots on approximately 36.03 acres described as Tracts 5A, 5C1, 5B, 5A3, and 5A2, Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lots 3R, 5B and 5A (5A and 5B being portions of Lot 5) Brock Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 2607, 2621, 2631, 2641, and 2651 W. Southlake Blvd. and 250, 400 and 410 Brock Dr., Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #11. REQUEST DETAILS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development for Stone Trail Estates to include 61 residential lots and 12 open space lots on approximately 36.03 acres. The plan has been revised since the April 7, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to address comments provided at the meeting. The previously presented plan included 65 residential lots and 11 open space lots. In addition to reducing the number of residential lots by four lots, the open space area has been increased from approximately 8.98 acres to approximately 10.01 acres, which has increased the percentage of open space from 24.92% to 27.78% of the gross acreage. The proposed gross density has decreased from 1.80 to 1.69 du/ac. and the net density has decreased from 2.09 to 1.96 du/ac. Site Data Summary 4/7/16 P&Z 5/5/16 P&Z Number of Residential Lots 65 61 Number of Open Space Lots 11 12 Gross Acreage 36.03 36.03 Gross Density 1.80 du/acre 1.69 du/acre Net Acreage 31.13 31.13 Net Density 2.09 du/acre 1.96 du/acre Open Space Acreage 8.98 10.01 Open Space Percentage 24.92% 27.78% The majority of the site is designated “Medium Density Residential”, which is suitable for any single-family detached residential development. Approximately 6.77 acres of the proposed developement that is currently in the Brock Additions has a Low Density Case No. ZA15-152 Residential designation in the 2030 Land Use Plan. The number of lots in that portion of the subdivision has been reduced from seven (7) to six (6) to comply with the Low Density Residential designation, which requires a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre, so the Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential that was being requested under case number CP15-004 is no longer required. That case has been withdrawn by the applicant. The R-PUD district will follow the uses and regulations in the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District except as noted in the table below: Development Regulations (Compared to SF-20A Base Zoning) SF-20A Previous R-PUD Revised R-PUD Front Yard Setback 35’ 25’ 25’ 10’ 10’ Side Yard Setback 15’ 20’ adjacent to a street 20’ adjacent to a street 40’ Rear Yard Setback 20’ 20’ 35’ on cul-de-sac Maximum Lot Coverage 30% 45% 45% Minimum Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. 12,825 sq. ft. 12,825 sq. ft. 95’ 95’ Lot Width 100’ 75’ for pie shaped corner 75’ for pie shaped corner lots lots Lot Depth 125’ 135’ 135’ Maximum Gross 2.18 du/acre 1.80 du/acre 1.69 du/acre Density Minimum Floor Area 1,800 sq.ft. 3,000 sq.ft 3,000 sq.ft 35’ and 2 ½ Maximum Height 35’ and 2 ½ stories 35’ and 2 ½ stories stories The Development Plan shows one street connection to W. Southlake Blvd. There is not a median opening at the proposed location, so the intersection will be a right-in right-out only onto W. Southlake Blvd. A second connection to Naples Dr. to the south that was previously proposed to be gated as an emergency access only is now proposed to be open. The variance request to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow Naples Drive as a “dead-end”street has been removed. VARIANCES REQUESTED: 1. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1 requires a minimum distance from a residential driveway to an intersection of 250’. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the proposed street intersection on W,. Southlake Blvd. to be located approximately 199’ from the existing church driveway to the west. Variance approval criteria has been included in Attachment ‘A’, page 4 of this report. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct a public hearing 2. Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Corridor Committee Meeting Report (D) SPIN Meeting Report Case No. ZA15-152 (E) Plans and Support Information (Link to PowerPoint) (F) Revised Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 28, 2016 (G) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses for Commission and Council Members Only (H) Full Size Plans () STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817)748-8072 Richard Schell (817)748-8602 Case No. ZA15-152 BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICANT: Terra/Manna, LLC OWNERS: Margaret J. Haney and Sandra Lynn Bagwell PROPERTY LOCATION: Generally located south of W. Southlake Blvd. and west and south of Brock Dr. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 5A, 5C1, 5B, 5A3, and 5A2, Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lots 3R, 5B and 5A (5A and 5B being portions of Lot 5) Brock Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential and 100-Year Floodplain CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: - The propertywas annexed into the City in 1956 and given the “AG” Agricultural District zoning designation. - A Plat Showing for Brock Addition was filed November 8, 1967. - The “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District zoning was placed on the Brock Addition property with the adoption of Ordinance No. 480 and the Official Zoning Map in September of 1989. - A Plat Revision for Lots 1R and 3R, Brock Addition was approved September 2, 1997 and filed November 21, 1997. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The majority of the site is designated “Medium Density Residential”, which is suitable for any single-family detached residential development. Approximately 6.77 acres of the proposed developement that is currently in the Brock Additions has a Low Density Residential designation in the 2030 Land Use Plan. The number of lots in that portion of the subdivision has been reduced from seven (7) to six (6) to comply with the Low Density Residential designation, which requires a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre, so the Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential that was being requested under case number CP15-004 is no longer required. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows W. Southlake Blvd. to be a Farm-to-Market road with 130’ of right of way. Adequate right of way is shown to be dedicated on the plans. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan shows the existing 8’ multi-use trail along the south side of Southlake Blvd. and a future ≥8’ multi-use trail extending from W. Southlake Blvd. to Union church Rd. through the floodplain. Case No. Attachment A ZA15-152 Page 1 Major Corridors Urban Design Plan The property is in the “Estate Residential” zone in the Major Corridors Urban Design Plan. The following recommendations pertain to the “Estate Residential” zone in the plan. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The development shows one street access onto W. Southlake Blvd., which is currently a six-lane divided arterial. The traffic counts are below. W. Southlake Blvd. (between Davis Blvd. & S. Pearson Ln.) 24hr East Bound (18,836) West Bound (18,766) Peak AM (2,075) Peak AM (1,110) AM 7:00 AM – 8:00 AM 11:30 AM – 12:30 PM Peak PM (1,137) Peak PM (2,122) PM 5:45 PM– 6:45 PM 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM * Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Traffic Impact Case No. Attachment A ZA15-152 Page 2 AM-AM-PM-PM- Use Lots Vtpd* IN OUT IN OUT Single Family Residential (210) 65 622 13 37 42 24 4/7 P&Z Submittal Single Family Residential (210) 61 584 12 35 40 22 5/5 P&Z Submittal Net Difference -4 -38 -1 -2 -2 -2 Vehicle Trips Per Day * * AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour of generator on a weekday th * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 Edition WATER & SEWER: The property proposes to connect to an existing 12” water line in W. Southlake Blvd. to the north and to an existing 8” water line in Naples Dr. to the south. A stub out is proposed to the property to the Watermere Addition to the west. Sanitary sewer for the development is proposed to connect to an existing 8” sewer line in Naples Dr to the south. A stub out is proposed to the property to the east. TREE PRESERVATION: For property sought to be zoned R-PUD, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (see below). The applicant is proposing to preserve 53.62% of the existing tree cover, which is increased from the 51.52% of existing tree cover that was proposed to be preserved on the previous plan. The existing tree cover is shown to be 40.23% and if the case was for straight zoning, a minimum 50% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: This project was discussed at the 2030 Corridor Committee Meeting on December 2, 2015. The meeting report is included as Attachment C of this report. A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on September 22, 2015. A SPIN Report is included as Attachment D of this Staff Report. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: February 4, 2016; The item was tabled to the February 18, 2016 meeting at the applicant’s request. February 18, 2016; The item was tabled to the March 3, 2016 meeting at the applicant’s request. March 3, 2016; The item was tabled to the April 7, 2016 meeting at the applicant’s request. April 7, 2016; The item was tabled to the May 5, 2016 meeting at the applicant’s request. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 28, 2016. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Section 8.2 VARIANCES AND APPEALS: Any applicant who desires a variance or elimination of the requirements herein, or who desires to appeal a decision of the Director regarding modifications to this Case No. Attachment A ZA15-152 Page 3 ordinance shall file a written appeal to the Director who shall place the request on the agenda for consideration by the City Council. The City Council shall have the authority to grant a variance to this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The decision of the City Council shall be final. Case No. Attachment A ZA15-152 Page 4 Case No. Attachment B ZA15-152 Page 1 2030 Corridor Committee Meeting Report Case No. Attachment C ZA15-152 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-152 Page 2 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-152 Page 3 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-152 Page 4 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-152 Page 5 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-152 Page 1 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-152 Page 2 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-152 Page 3 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-152 Page 4 R-PUD REGULATIONS Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 1 Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 2 Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 3 PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 4/7/16 P&Z MEETING REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 5/5/16 P&Z MEETING Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 4 SCREENING AND FENCE PLAN Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 5 PREVIOUS TREE CONSERVATION PLAN AT 4/7 P&Z MEETING Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 6 REVISED TREE CONSERVATION PLAN AT 5/5 P&Z MEETING Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 7 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 8 Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 9 Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 10 Case No. Attachment E ZA15-152 Page 11 Development Plan Review Summary ZA15-152Review No. Three 04/28/16 Case No.: Date of Review: Development Plan– Stone Trail Estates Project Name: APPLICANT: Paul Spain PLANNER: Curtis Young Terra/manna, LLC Sage Group, Inc. 101 Clariden Ranch Rd. 1130 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 (817) 424-2626 Phone: (817) 410-9201 Phone: E-mail: E-mail: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/27/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602. 1. Lot 3R in the Brock Addition is shown to be included in the R-PUD zoning district. Please add the existing front setback (45’) to the Development Plan as it is labeled on the Preliminary Plat. * S pecific language has been added to the Open Space Management Plan describing the use and maintenance of Open Space Lot 18. The open space lot contains a driveway for the garage on Lot 4, Brock Addition. The HOA will be responsible for the maintenance of the driveway, fencing and landscaping, including irrigation on that lot. The lot is fenced off from the rest of the development. It is intended for the use of the owners of Lot 4, currently the McCalls, as a buffer and for driveway access. * All driveways/points of ingess/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). A minimum spacing of 500’ is required for the minimum distance from a commercial driveway ( a church is considered commercial property in the Driveway Ordnance definition) to an intersection along W. Southlake Blvd., but that spacing may be reduced to 250’ for right-in/right-out driveways. A variance letter has been submitted requesting a variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, to allow a spacing of 199’ to the Lakeside Presbyterian Church driveway to the west. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: * A Tree Conservation Analysis was submitted. The existing tree cover is shown to be 40.23% and under straight zoning a minimum 50% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 53.62% of the existing tree cover so the existing tree cover preservation would comply with the existing tree cover preservation requirements. Case No. Attachment F ZA15-152 Page 1 Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the the entire site existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. Case No. Attachment F ZA15-152 Page 2 LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD COMMENTS: * The 20’ – L type north bufferyard has been provided. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Om Chhetri, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8089 E-mail: ochhetri@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Please update the Traffic Analysis based on the reduced number of lots. Per the City of Southlake driveway ordinance 634, a deceleration lane is required if the site peak period ingress movement is greater than 40 veh/ hr. The Traffic Analysis from Kimley-Horn shows 41 veh/hr for the previous plan with 65 lots. If a deceleration lane is required, a shorter deceleration lane than TxDOT requirements may be required due to the geographical challenges with respect to the distance to the adjacent western church driveway. This requirement will be contingent on TxDOT’s willingness to amend their access requirement. A future deceleration lane is also proposed at the Lakeside Presbyterian church with phase II of the development. 3. Show any proposed sidewalks in the site plan. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. A comparison of Tc’s in itself cannot be accepted as justification for waiving detention. The Engineer should update the HEC-1 model to demonstrate the impacts of hydrograph timing. If this study indicates no increase in peak discharge, the detention requirement can be waived. If during final design a detention pond was deemed required, the applicant may be required to revise to the concept/site/development plan and obtain approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. 2. Include a pre-developed conditions drainage area map/calculations and provide calculations that demonstrate no adverse impact in post-project conditions as a result of development within basin A-1. * LOMR shall be obtained prior to acceptance of the subdivision. Case No. Attachment F ZA15-152 Page 3 * Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed. * Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure may require a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction. * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre- construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Subdivision street names to be approved by city prior to final plat. Submit proposed names and alternate names as soon as possible. The gated entry, if approved, must be equipped with an Opticom or KS-2 switch for opening the gate electronically, as well as a means for manual opening. Cul-de-Sacs must have 30 ft. inside turn radius and 50 foot radius (100 foot diameter) for Case No. Attachment F ZA15-152 Page 4 approved turnaround. (Plans show a 90’ diameter). Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager 817-748-8607 pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $3000 per dwelling unit x 61 dwelling units = $183,000. $6000 credit will be given for two existing dwellings. Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. Other informational comments? General Informational Comments * A SPIN meeting for this development was held on September 22, 2015. * Properties within Corridor Overlay Zone see Ord. 480-S § 43.9.c.1(e) for design criteria. Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 39.5(4) requires fences along W. Southlake Blvd. to comply with the Architectural Fencing requirements of the Corridor Overlay District. (Section43.9(c)1(f), which “All architectural fencing which runs roughly parallel to the SH 114, Carroll Ave.FM 1709, states FM 1938, rights of way shall be constructed of the primary materials of the building, wrought iron or living plant material. It shall not run in a straight line without being offset by a minimum of 6 feet every 60 feet. It shall be located no closer to the right of way than one half the width of the required bufferyard. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. Case No. Attachment F ZA15-152 Page 5 * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * The proposed street connection on Southlake Blvd. requires TXDOT approval. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment F ZA15-152 Page 6 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Stone Trail Estates SPO Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response # 1. NADO I LLC SP1 2530 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.92 F 2. NADO I LLC SP1 2580 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.71 F NR 3. BONOLA FAMILY LTD PRTNSHP SF1-A 2608 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.78 4. HALL, JERRY G SF1-A 102 JELLICO CIR 1.24 NR 5. WIESMAN, E I AG 2607 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.88 F 6. QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 109 BROCK DR 0.58 O 7. VARGAS, PERRY W SF1-A 209 BROCK DR 1.14 O 8. HOWARD, EMMA L SF1-A 303 BROCK DR 1.13 O 9. WIESMAN, E I AG 2641 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.39 NR 10.MCCALL, MARIE C SF1-A 320 BROCK DR 1.33 O 11.KUELBS, GREGORY G RE 500 DAVIS BLVD 5.50 NR 12.PAPILLARD, MARJORIE S SF1-A 319 BROCK DR 0.67 NR 13.PAPILLARD, MARJORIE A SF1-A 329 BROCK DR 0.74 NR 14.HANEY, ARVEL W EST SF1-A 400 BROCK DR 4.84 F 15.KUELBS, GREGORY G RE 504 DAVIS BLVD 2.03 NR 16.LOWMAN, MIKE SF20A 711 PORTOFINO PL 0.47 NR 17.FRANKS, NINA SF20A 700 VENICE AVE 0.47 NR 18.BEENE, LORI DAMRON SF20A 719 PORTOFINO PL 0.46 NR 19.FAZEN, MARK A SF20A 720 PORTOFINO PL 0.46 NR 20.HARIDAS, RAGHAVEN SF20A 701 VENICE AVE 0.46 NR 21.POTEET, THOMAS AG 2435 MICHAEL DR 0.55 NR 22.C&T LAWNS LLC AG 2440 MICHAEL DR 1.13 NR 23.STRAND, VERLO J AG 2420 MICHAEL DR 1.13 NR Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 1 24.C&T LAWNS LLC AG 2425 MICHAEL DR 1.11 NR 25.SMYTH, HENRY C SP2 301 WATERMERE DR 6.37 NR 26.MULLENIX, DAVID W SF20A 701 PORTOFINO PL 0.59 NR 27.SMYTH, HENRY C SP2 301 WATERMERE DR 8.90 NR 28.WIESMAN, E I AG 2651 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 13.18 NR 29.LAKESIDE PRESBYTERAN CHURCH CS 2701 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 7.43 NR 30.KUELBS, GREGORY G SF1-A 684 DAVIS BLVD 5.00 NR 31.JOHNSON, GEORGE AG 2390 MICHAEL DR 1.13 NR 32.WIESMAN, E I AG 2621 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.22 NR 33.WIESMAN, E I AG 2631 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.50 NR 34.HANEY, ARVEL W EST SF1-A 410 BROCK DR 1.70 NR 35.BYLER, JOHN R SF20A 705 PORTOFINO PL 0.46 NR 36.FARAGHER, JACK SF20A 707 PORTOFINO PL 0.47 NR 37.YOUNG, MICHAEL M SF20A 715 PORTOFINO PL 0.52 NR 38.QUINN, WILLIAM AG 2445 MICHAEL DR 0.57 NR 39.COUCH, BOBBIE JOE SF2 829 SIENA DR 2.37 NR 40.SOUTHLAKE CHURCH OF CHRIST CS 2417 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.82 NR 41.WIESMAN, E I SF1-A 250 BROCK DR 1.53 NR 42.BUCY, DOROTHY HALLMARK SP1 2419 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.28 NR 43.QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 105 BROCK DR 0.51 O Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Forty-three (43) Responses Received Within 200’: Five (5) responses and 12 Public Comment Forms – Attached Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 2 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 3 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 4 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 5 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 6 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 7 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 8 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 9 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 10 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 11 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 12 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 13 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 14 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 15 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 16 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 17 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 18 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 19 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 20 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 21 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 22 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 23 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 24 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 25 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 26 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 27 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 28 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 29 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 30 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 31 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 32 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 33 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 34 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 35 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 36 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 37 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 38 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-152 Page 39