Item 6B
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
April 13, 2016
CASE NO:ZA16-012
PROJECT:Site Plan for TD Ameritrade
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
TD Ameritrade is requesting approval of a Site Plan for a TD Ameritrade regional
campus on property described as Lot 1R1R1, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus
Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at
1051 W. Kirkwood Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “NR-PUD” Non-
Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN Neighborhood # 1.
DETAILS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Site Plan for a TD Ameritrade regional
campus consisting of an approximately 355,000 square foot three-story office
building and a five level parking garage on approximately 78.617 acres.
A Zoning Change and Concept Plan for NR-PUD allowing a variety of non-
residential uses and development to include "High-Tech" uses, "O-2 Office",
"Parking Structures", "Hotel", "Restaurant" on approximately 155 acres was
approved on July 20, 1999 under Case ZA99-056 (Ordinance 480-313). A
Development Plan for Sabre Group Campus was approved on January 18, 2000
under Case ZA99-090. The proposed Site Plan conforms to the uses and
regulations that were approved as Exhibit “B” in Ordinance 480-313 and the plans
substantially conform to the approved Concept Plan and Development Plan.
(Link to Ordinance No. 480-313)
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning “NR-PUD”
Land Use Designation Mixed Use
Gross/Net Acreage 78.617 ac.
Main Building Floor Area (Gross) 355,000 sq. ft.
Office Area 335,000 sq. ft.
Cellar Area20,000 sq. ft.
Main Building No. of Floors 3 stories
Main Building Height 62 ft.
Parking Garage No. of Levels 5 levels
Parking Garage Height (per Ord. No. 480) 37’ (parapet)
Overall Height 42’ (stair towers)
Open Space % 84.3%
Impervious Coverage % 15.7%
Total Parking Required 1,117 spaces
Parking Garage Spaces Provided 2014 spaces
Surface Parking Spaces Provided 97 Spaces
Total Parking Spaces Provided 2,111 spaces
Case No.
ZA16-012
Per the Planning and Zoning Commission motion for approval at their April 7,
2016 meeting, the applicant has revised the Landscape Plan to add landscape
screening along Kirkwood Blvd. to further screen the parking garage. The trees
added to the plan are listed below:
Post Oak: 18
Eastern Red Cedar: 18
Cedar Elm: 6
Live Oak: 6
Texas Redbud: 9
Total Trees added: 57
Also, a revised Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted April 12, 2016. The
Executive Summary from the revised TIA is included in Attachment “F” of this
report along with a response letter from the City’s traffic consultant, Lee
Engineering.
ACTION NEEDED:1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) SPIN meeting Report dated February 9, 2016
(D) Corridor Planning Committee Report dated February 3, 2016
(E) Minutes for the Joint City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission
Work Session held on February 22, 2016
(F) Plans and Support Information – Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 12, 2016
(G)
(H) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
for Commission and Council members only
(I) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA16-012
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT:
TD Ameritrade
PROPERTY SITUATION:
1051 W. Kirkwood Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 1R1R1, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Mixed Use and 100-year Floodplain
CURRENT ZONING:
“NR-PUD” – Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District
HISTORY:
August 17, 1982 - The southern portion of this property was zoned "H"
Heavy Commercial under case ZA82-024 (Ordinance No. 261-35).
November 19, 1985 - The northern portion of this site was zoned "H"-
Heavy Commercial with the annexation of this portion of the property
under Ordinance No. 319.
August 4, 1987 - Inclusive of the above described areas, approximately
342 acres, bounded by T.W. King Road, W. S.H. 114, W. Dove Road
and N. White Chapel Blvd. was zoned from "H" Heavy Commercial to
"PUD" Planned Unit Development allowing "R-1" and "R-2" Retail, "O-1"
and "O-2" office and "CS" Community Service district development
under case ZA87-015 (Ordinance 334-012).
September 19, 1989 - The above described 342 acres was given "PUD"
Planned Unit Development zoning allowing "C-3" General Commercial,
"CS" Community Service development with the adoption of the Zoning
Ordinance No. 480 and the official zoning map.
October 17, 1995 - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan for NR-PUD
allowing "C-3" General Commercial, "O-2" Office, "HC" Hotel and "CS"
Community Service development under Case ZA95-074 (Ordinance 480-
180) was approved for an approximately 127 acre portion of the
previously described 342 acres, west of the alignment of the approximate
alignment of Kirkwood Boulevard; "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit
Development allowing detached single family residential development
was approved under Case ZA95-073 (Ordinance 480-179) for
approximately 199 acre portion of the previously described 342 acres,
east of the approximate alignment of Kirkwood Boulevard.
July 20, 1999 - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan for NR-PUD
allowing a variety of non-residential uses and development to include
"High-Tech" uses, "O-2 Office", "Parking Structures", "Hotel",
"Restaurant" was approved for approximately 155 acre under Case
ZA99-056 (Ordinance 480-313). The area included portions of the above
described "NR-PUD" west of the alignment of Kirkwood Boulevard and
a northern portion of the "R-PUD" area east of the alignment of Kirkwood
Boulevard.
October 19, 1999 - A Preliminary Plat for Lots 1-4, Block 1, Sabre Group
Campus was approved under Case ZA99-080.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-012 Page 1
November 18, 1999 - A Final Plat for Lots 1-4, Block 1, Sabre Group
Campus was approved under case ZA99-096.
January 18, 2000 - A Development Plan for Sabre Group Campus was
approved under Case ZA99-090.
March 20, 2007 - A Plat Revision for Lots 1R1, 1R2, 2R, 4R1, 4R2 and 4R3,
Block 1, Sabre Group Campus was approved under case ZA07-025.
September 15, 2015 - A Plat Revision for Lots 1R1R1 and 1R1R2, Block 1,
Sabre Group Campus was approved under case ZA15-085.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN:
Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2030 future land use designations for the site are Mixed Use and 100-
Year Floodplain.
The purpose of the Mixed Use designation is to provide an option for large-
scale, master-planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses
such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses.
The range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the
Mixed Use
varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the category
necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New
development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing
development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design and
transition between different uses.
Mixed Use
Typically, the designation is intended for medium- to higher
intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and
residential uses. Nuisance-free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and
assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be
compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted
Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density
in the
Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, Office
and
Commercial
categories.
Floodplain
The category illustrates areas designated by the August 1995
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps as being in the
100-year floodplain. The “floodplain” is an expanse of natural vegetation and
wildlife, and should be preserved as natural open area. Within the floodplain
is “floodway” that must be kept free of encroachment in order that the 100-
year flood may be carried without harmful increases in the height of flood
waters. Although it is not to be encouraged, the portion of the floodplain not
in the floodway may be reclaimed for development under certain
circumstances if in accordance with FEMA regulations. The designated land
use for areas of reclaimed floodplain is that of the immediately adjacent
land use category. This designation may also include environmentally
sensitive areas, habitats, or wetlands that may not be in FEMA identified
floodplains.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows W. S.H. 114 to be a
variable width freeway and W. Kirkwood Blvd. to be a four-lane divided
arterial with 100’ of right of way. Adequate right of way is shown on the Site
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-012 Page 2
Plan. The upcoming Kirkwood Expansion includes the widening of Kirkwood
Boulevard from Stockton Drive to Tyler Street from the current two-lane
configuration to the ultimate build out of A4D, four lanes divided with a
landscaped median. This improvement will allow for a consistent and
continuous cross-section along Kirkwood Blvd.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows a Future Multi-Use Trail (≥8’) along S.H.
114 and a Future Sidewalk (<8’) along Kirkwood Blvd. The NR-PUD zoning
regulations only require parks, open space and trails as shown on the
approved Concept Plan, which shows no trails or sidewalks along S.H. 114
or Kirkwood Blvd. No 8’ multi-use trail is shown on the proposed Site Plan
along S.H. 114 and a 6’ sidewalk is shown along Kirkwood Blvd. between
the two driveways adjacent to the parking garage. Future 6’ sidewalks along
W. Kirkwood Blvd. are shown extending north and south from those two
driveways to the property lines. A 5’ sidewalk exists along a portion of the
northern property line adjacent to W. Kirkwood Blvd. across a bridge over
the creek to the Sabre property.
Major Corridors Urban Design Plan
The following recommendations pertain to private development along S.H.
114:
Preserve existing natural view corridors where appropriate.
Specifically, tree stands along the highway should be preserved
when they terminate views from the highway.
In order to maximize regional access and limit the impact of strip
retail development, retail and restaurant development should be
concentrated at interchanges in 1-2 story buildings with higher
intensity office and institutional uses at mid-block locations.
Establish appropriate scale and bulk standards for buildings along
the highway, specifically at mid-block locations. Buildings should be
4 – 6 stories tall and step down as they move away from the
highway corridor. Buildings over three stories should be articulated
along the first three floors. Materials on the lower floors should be
brick, stone or other approved masonry. Low-profile, single story
pad buildings that tend to blend into the background and have
limited visibility from the highway are discouraged.
All windows on buildings should be vertically oriented and be
articulated with a 4-inch reveal to avoid solid, flat walls, and to
create shadow lines and surface texture. Glass curtain walls and
facades with more than 60% glass along any elevation shall be
discouraged. Along retail store fronts, 1’ – 2’ high knee walls shall
limit the amount of glass along each façade visible from public
streets.
The view of surface parking from the highway should be limited.
Surface parking lots should be designed to be in smaller pods (no
more than 200 parking spaces) with increased landscaping and
pedestrian accessways.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-012 Page 3
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed development will have three access driveways onto W.
Kirkwood Blvd. Two possible locations for connections onto a future W.
S.H. 114 frontage road are shown on the plan. Traffic counts are not
available for the portion of Kirkwood Blvd. between S. H. 114 and Stockton
Dr.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for this development. The
Executive Summary from the TIA is included in Attachment ‘F’ of this report.
TREE PRESERVATION:
The applicant is requesting that Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D be
the controlling ordinance for this Site Plan. There is approximately 65.3%
tree cover on the site. The plan is showing to preserve 76% of the existing
canopy on the plan. The minimum percentage to be preserved per Tree
Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D is 40%.
UTILITIES:
The existing 12” water line that runs across the property from Kirkwood
Blvd. at the southeast corner of the property to the Sabre Campus to the
north will be removed and replaced by a 12” water line along W. Kirkwood
Blvd. on the east side of the property where an 8” line currently exists. The
utility plan shows water connections to the existing 12” water line at the T.
W. King intersection on the north side of the property and to the 12” water
line along W. Kirkwood Blvd. on the east side of the property that will
replace the existing 8” water line. A sewer connection to the 8” sewer line in
W. Kirkwood Blvd. at the southeast corner of the property is proposed.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development:
A SPIN meeting was held for this project on February 9, 2016. A copy of the
report for this meeting can be found under Attachment ‘C’ of this staff
report.
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on February 3,
2016. A copy of the report for this meeting can be found under Attachment
‘D’ of this staff report.
A Joint City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session
was held on February 22, 2016. The minutes can be found under
Attachment ‘E’ of this report.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION:
April 7, 2015; Approved (5-0) subject to the staff report dated April 7, 2016
and Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated March 31, 2016 and noting the
applicant’s willingness to address the landscape shielding around the
parking garages and also asking City staff to request the presence of
TXDOT at the City Council meeting to provide the residents more
information about what can be done to accelerate the expansion of SH 114
and also asking that the staff provide the residents and City Council more
information with respect to the hiring of a consultant to press that issue.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-012 Page 4
STAFF COMMENTS
: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 12, 2016.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA16-012 Page 5
SPIN MEETING REPORT
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-012 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-012 Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-012 Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-012 Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-012 Page 5
Case No. Attachment C
ZA16-012 Page 6
2035 CORRIDOR PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 1
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 2
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 4
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 5
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 6
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 7
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 8
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 9
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 10
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 11
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 12
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 13
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 14
Case No. Attachment D
ZA16-012 Page 15
MINUTES FOR THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-012 Page 1
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-012 Page 2
Case No. Attachment E
ZA16-012 Page 3
SITE PLAN
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 1
RENDERINGS
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 2
RENDERINGS
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 3
ELEVATIONS
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 4
GARAGE ELEVATIONS
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 5
LANDSCAPE PLAN
Additional screening added
Additional Landscaping Added
Post Oak: 18
Eastern Red Cedar: 18
Cedar Elm: 6
Live Oak: 6
Texas Redbud: 9
Total Trees added: 57
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 6
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 7
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
(LINK TO TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 8
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 9
LEE ENGINEERING REVIEW OF TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 2
Case No. Attachment F
ZA16-012 Page 3
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA16-012Three04/12/16
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Site Plan – TD Ameritrade
Project Name:
APPLICANT: Milly Butler OWNER: Rudy Flores
TD Ameritrade TD Ameritrade
4600 Alliance Gateway 4600 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76177 Fort Worth, TX 76177
Phone: (817) 490-2906 Phone: (817) 490-2940
E-mail: milly.butler@tdameritrade.com E-mail: rudy.flores@tdameritrade.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
04/11/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. The Site Plan must comply with the underlying “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit
Development zoning district and Concept Plan (Ordinance No. 480-313).
2. A potential future covered walkway from the parking garage to the building is shown on the Site
Plan. Provide elevations showing the dimensions and materials of the breezeway for approval
with the proposed Site Plan. Otherwise, the breezeway will require approval of a Revised Site
Plan and elevations by the City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission prior to issuance of a building permit.
3. Staff recommends providing exhibits and/or examples of the building façade materials and the
gabion/stone retaining wall materials.
4. A minimum 8 foot tall masonry screen wall matching the principal building with a solid metal
access gate(s) is required for all trash and recycling receptacles.
5. A minimum 10’ solid screening wall shall be required to screen views of loading docks and
loading spaces intended for tractor/semi-trailer delivery from any public right of way. This 10’
wall must screen the entire loading dock or space. Screening materials shall utilize similar
masonry materials to the front façade. The accommodation of adequate access for service
delivery trucks may be evaluated to determine the extent of the screening required.
Tree Conservation and Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. Temporary offices, parking, and storage are proposed in the field area south of the building on
Sheet C10, but there are existing trees shown to be preserved within the area. Ensure that the
layout of the temporary offices, parking, and storage does not alter any of the existing trees shown
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-012 Page 1
to be preserved on the Tree Conservation Plan.
* The proposed Existing Tree Cover Preservation complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation
Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-D. The site’s existing tree cover is 65.31%
and 40% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved per Ord. 585-D. The applicant is
proposing to preserve 76% of the sites existing tree cover.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover
that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
* The proposed interior and bufferyards landscaping comply with the property PUD Development
Standards outlined in Ordinance No. 480-313.
* One of the landscape/screening requirements outlined within the property Development Standards
is that all parking structures must be screened from Kirkwood Boulevard by planting at least four (4)
canopy trees per one-hundred (100) linear feet of structure façade that faces Kirkwood Boulevard.
To meet this requirement a landscape buffer area with existing trees and vegetation is proposed to
be preserved between Kirkwood Boulevard and the parking garage. The amount of required trees
to be planted per the PUD regulation is seventeen (17), and the applicant is proposing to preserve
approximately fifty-five (55) existing trees within the area allocated.
* Per the Planning and Zoning Commission motion for approval at their April 7, 2016 meeting, the
applicant has revised the Landscape Plan to add landscape screening along Kirkwood Blvd. to
further screen the parking garage. The trees added to the plan are listed below:
Post Oak: 18
Eastern Red Cedar: 18
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-012 Page 2
Cedar Elm: 6
Live Oak: 6
Texas Redbud: 9
Total Trees added: 57
Since the Post Oaks may be hard to find, please add a note to the Landscape Plan stating that
the trees to be added to further screen the parking garage will be a similar type if the trees
shown are unavailable.
* Additional Post Oaks, Cedar Elms, Wax Myrtles, and Red Buds are proposed to be planted in
the interior landscape area between the garage and the West Kirkwood Blvd. right-of-way. Post
Oak trees are native to the area but are very difficult to find nursery grown and difficult to
transplant. Wax Myrtles are not a very sustainable accent tree. Although they can provide good
screening their wood is weak and breaks during winter ice and snow, and they prefer more
moisture than other plant material proposed and/or existing on the site. Trees other than Post
Oak and Wax Myrtle might make a better choice.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
New Requirement:
2. Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must
include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially
reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent
pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the
project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing
controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical
construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the
landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and
SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction
removal of controls.
plans.
NEW REQUIREMENT:
3. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a
registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building
Inspections Department prior to construction.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
* Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-012 Page 3
1. Lee Engineering, our traffic consultant has provided a separate letter with traffic comments.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review.
The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general
notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines
pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817)
748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the
City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with
completely sprinkled buildings. (Hydrant spacing not indicated on drawings; add hydrants as
necessary)
Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems and standpipes must be within 100 feet of a
fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes. (FDC locations not indicated on
plans) Add FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection, and fire hydrants as necessary to
meet requirements.
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting for this project was held on February 9, 2016.
* The detention basin must be in a drainage easement.
* The Master Pathways Plan shows a Future Multi-Use Trail (≥8’) along S.H. 114 and a Future
Sidewalk (<8’) along Kirkwood Blvd. The NR-PUD zoning regulations only require parks, open
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-012 Page 4
space and trails as shown on the approved Concept Plan, which shows no trails or sidewalks along
S.H. 114 or Kirkwood Blvd. No 8’ multi-use trail is shown on the proposed Site Plan along S.H. 114
and a 6’ sidewalk is shown along Kirkwood Blvd. between the two driveways adjacent to the
parking garage. Future 6’ sidewalks along W. Kirkwood Blvd. are shown extending north and south
from those two driveways to the property lines. A 5’ sidewalk exists along a portion of the northern
property line adjacent to W. Kirkwood Blvd. across a bridge over the creek to the Sabre property.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* Building height is measured from the elevation of the highest adjoining sidewalk or ground
surface within a 5' horizontal distance of the exterior wall of the building unless the highest
grade is more than 10' higher than the lowest grade, in which case the height is measured from
an elevation 10' higher than the lowest grade. In the case of the garage, the height is measured
from an elevation 10' higher than the lowest grade (591'), or 601' to the predominant parapet
height at approximately 638' (per the Section sheet), resulting in a height of 37' per the Zoning
Ordinance.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended and the NR-PUD
regulations.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of
lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. Please be aware that any lighting for the optional
recreational sport courts or fields must also meet the requirements of the Lighting Ordinance.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
65
* It appears that this property lies within the LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use
Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones except as noted in the NR-PUD regulations.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site
plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all
required fees must be paid.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment G
ZA16-012 Page 5
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
TD Ameritrade
SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acreage Response
1. MILHIZER, ERIC RPUD 569 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.49 NR
2.
NR
DUCANES, A CHRISTOPHER RPUD 573 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.51
3. ALTIMONT, DAVID RPUD 520 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.56 O
4. ZEALLOS, JUAN RPUD 516 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.73 NR
5. SINNOTT, ROBERT A RPUD 504 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.69 NR
6. FISCHER, DIRK T RPUD 2815 TYLER ST 0.68 U
7. KIRKWOOD HOLLOW HO
O
ASSOC RPUD 2850 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 1.17
8. SABRE HEADQUARTERS LLC NRPUD 3150 KIRKWOOD BLVD 25.45 NR
9.
NR
FAVERO, JAMES R RPUD 500 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.58
10.KIRKWOOD HOLLOW HO
O
ASSOC RPUD 2818 TYLER ST 0.10
11.WILKS SOUTH LAKE
NR
DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3123 KIRKWOOD BLVD 11.26
12.5 VILLAGE CIRCLE HOLDINGS NRPUD 1 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 20.41 NR
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 1
LP
13.DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE 114 HWY 19.99 NR
14.DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE 114 HWY 0.24 NR
15.WILKS SOUTH LAKE
NR
DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3000 KIRKWOOD BLVD 84.04
16.DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE 114 HWY 4.38 NR
17.DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE 114 HWY 0.08 NR
18.REDUS TEXAS LAND LLC NRPUD 3400 E T KING RD W 1.92 NR
19.SOUTHLAKE CITY NRPUD 2925 KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.39 NR
20.WARD, JOHN WESLEY RPUD 577 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.61 NR
21.DELEMOS, JAMES A RPUD 581 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.87 NR
22.NEHRING, BRADFORD RPUD 524 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.60 NR
23.CHEAP THRILLS DECOR LLC RPUD 512 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.70 NR
24.DANG, VI RPUD 508 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.62 NR
25.TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 600 W DOVE RD 1.14 NR
26.TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 600 W DOVE RD 0.26 NR
27.TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 600 W DOVE RD 3.65 NR
28.WILKS SOUTH LAKE
NR
DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3415 T KING RD W 4.29
29.WILKS SOUTH LAKE
NR
DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3325 KIRKWOOD BLVD 2.95
30.SABRE HEADQUARTERS LLC NRPUD 3225 KIRKWOOD BLVD 9.15 NR
31.WILKS SOUTH LAKE
NR
DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3125 KIRKWOOD BLVD 13.77
F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent:
Thirty-one (31)
Responses Received within 200’:
Three (3) – Attached
Responses Received outside 200’:
Twenty-four (24) – Attached
Comment cards from April 7, 2016 P&Z meeting:
Fifteen (15) – Attached
Responses and e-mails received after 2:00 p.m. on April 13, 2016 will be handed out to the Mayor
and City Council members prior to the Council meeting on April 19, 2016.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 2
Responses Received within 200’
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 3
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 4
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 5
Responses Received outside 200’
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 6
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 7
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 8
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 9
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 10
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 11
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 12
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 13
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 14
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 15
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 16
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 17
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 18
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 19
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 20
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 21
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 22
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 23
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 24
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 25
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 26
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 27
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 28
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 29
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 30
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 31
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 32
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 33
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 34
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 35
Comment Forms at April 7, 2016 P&Z Meeting
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 36
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 37
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 38
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 39
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 40
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 41
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 42
Case No. Attachment H
ZA16-012 Page 43