Item 6 - ZA15-151 - Saddleback Ridge Estates
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
April 1, 2016
CASE NO:ZA15-151
PROJECT:Preliminary Plat for Saddleback Ridge Estates
REQUEST:
Spectra Land is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Saddleback Ridge
Estates on property described as Tracts 3, 4 and 4B, R.D. Rice Survey no. 992
and Lot 1, Block 1, Quail Oaks Addition and Tract 11, A. Robinson Survey no.
1131, an addition to the City of Southlake, Denton County, Texas and located at
330-360 W Bob Jones Road and 4640 N White Chapel Boulevard, Southlake,
Texas. Current Zoning: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District. SPIN
Neighborhood #1.
Saddleback Ridge Estates was approved as a 32 lot SF-1A single family
residential subdivision in June 2006 (Ordinance No. 480-490.) Since that time,
extensions to the Preliminary Plat (ZA06-030) have been approved by City Council
nine times, and extensions to the Final Plat (ZA06-185) have been approved eight
times. This Preliminary Plat varies from those approved for extension in that it
proposes a private street as part of the plat. The previous plat was approved with a
single public street providing access from W Bob Jones Road.
The current plat carries over the overall layout of the 2006 plan, with 32 lots
accessed by a single divided private street (Saddleback Lane). To address fire
protection concerns relating to the proposed gated entry and proposed variance to
cul-de-sac length (see next section), each home will be built with a sprinkler
system. The gated entry feature is shown in attachment C. No guard house is
initially planned by the developer, but space is allocated within the entry area for a
future guard house.
The perimeter of the development will be bounded by a 6’ board on board cedar
fence along the east and west sides with a 6’ wrought tubular iron fence on the
north (back) side of the property and a combination of dry stacked stone wall and
brick pillars at the entry from W Bob Jones Road, with the remainder of the
northern boundary enclosed with split rail fencing. These fence types replace the
wrought iron fencing proposed with the previous plan. Within the development, a
system of terraced walls will be installed to manage grade changes along the road.
Other changes from the 2006 Preliminary Plat include the provision of a 5’
sidewalk along both sides of Saddleback Lane, a tree conservation plan, and the
provision of front platted setbacks which vary between 45 and 55 feet, depending
on the lot (40 feet minimum is required in the SF-1A district).
Case No.
ZA 15-151
Proposed Preliminary Plat
“SF-1A” Single Family
Zoning
Residential District
Land Use DesignationLow Density Residential
Minimum Lot Size1 acre
Maximum Density1 DU/acre
Number of Proposed Lots32
Number of Common Lots4 (including street)
Total Acreage42.40
Acreage of Residential Lots34.92
Gross Density.76 DU/acre
Net Density of Residential Lots.92 DU/acre
Existing Tree Canopy34.4%
Tree Canopy to Remain60%-61.7%
Variances Requested
– The original 2006 Preliminary Plat was approved with variances to allow a
single point of access, cul-de-sac length in excess of maximum allowed length, and a cul-de-sac which
serves in excess of 20 lots. The current submittal contains a request to allow a private street with Plat
approval. Consideration of this variance cannot be applied to the previously-approved Preliminary Plat.
Although the form of the plat proposed herein is substantially similar to the previously approved plat, it
must be considered as a new application due to the proposal for a private street. Consequently, all
variances previously granted with the 2006 application must again be requested and approved.
The variances are summarized in the following requests:
a. A variance from Ordinance 483, Section 5.01(C) to allow a single point of access.
b. A variance from Section 5.03(I) to allow a cul-de-sac to serve more than 20 lots and
exceed 1,000 feet.
c. A variance from Section 5.03(J) to allow a street greater than 1,200 feet with no street
stubs provided to adjoining properties.
*Though they are part of City ordinance, these variances pertain to sections of the
Subdivision Ordinance which allow for a certain level of discretion, with language
containing “should” and “generally” rather than firm “shall” or “must” statements common
in other section of Ordinance No. 480. In evaluating a variance from these sections, Staff,
the Commission and the City Council are authorized to consider site context, topography,
lot sizes, surrounding development and other factors in making a final determination of
adequacy.
Case No.
ZA 15-151
d. A variance from Section 5.04(B), which does not permit private streets in new subdivisions
in which fewer than 75% of the lots contain homeowner occupied structures, to allow the
proposed street to be constructed as a private street.
The variance request to allow a private street with Preliminary and Final Plat approval is more thoroughly
analyzed in the Transportation Assessment found in Attachment A, along with considerations for
variance from section 5.04(B).
ACTION NEEDED: a) Conduct a public hearing
b) Consider approval of Preliminary Plat
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information – Link to PowerPoint
(D) Variance Exhibit
(E) SPIN Meeting Report – February 9, 2016
(F) Review Summary No. 2 – April 1, 2016
(G) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT:
David Jones (748-8070)
Dennis Killough (748-8072)
Case No.
ZA 15-151
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER:
Spectra Land, LP
APPLICANT:
Tom LaHoda, The LaHoda Group
PROPERTY SITUATION:
Constituent parcels are located at 330, 340, 350, and 360 W Bob Jones Rd
and at 4640 N White Chapel Blvd
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Property described as Tracts 3, 4 and 4B, R.D. Rice Survey no. 992 and
Lot 1, Block 1, Quail Oaks Addition and Tract 11, A. Robinson Survey no.
1131, an addition to the City of Southlake, Denton County, Texas
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Low-Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING:
“SF-1A” Single-Family Residential District
REQUESTED ZONING:
“SF-1A” Single-Family Residential District
HISTORY:
City Council approved a change of zoning from “AG” and “RE” to “SF-1A”
on June 6, 2006 with an associated concept plan (ZA06-029).
A Preliminary Plat (ZA06-030) was approved by City Council on June 6,
2006.
A Final Plat (ZA06-185) was approved by the P& Z on January 18, 2007.
A Preliminary Plat extension was approved until June 7, 2009 on January
15, 2008. A Final Plat extension was approved until January 19, 2009 on
January 15, 2008.
A Preliminary Plat extension was approved until June 7 2010 on November
18, 2008. A Final Plat extension was approved until January 19, 2010 on
November 18, 2008.
A Preliminary Plat extension was approved until June 7, 2011 on
November 3, 2009. A Final Plat extension was approved until January 19,
2011 on November 3, 2009.
A Preliminary Plat extension was approved until June 7, 2012 on January
4, 2011. A Final Plat extension was approved until January 19, 2012 on
January 4, 2011.
A Preliminary Plat extension was approved until June 7, 2013 on January
3, 2012. A Final Plat extension was approved until January 19, 2013 on
January 3, 2012.
A Preliminary Plat extension was approved until June 7, 2014 on January
15, 2013. A Final Plat extension was approved until January 19, 2014 on
January 15, 2013.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 15-151 Page 1
A Preliminary Plat extension was approved until June 7, 2016 on January
20, 2015. A Final Plat extension was approved until January 19, 2016 on
January 20, 2015.
A Preliminary Plat extension was approved until June 7, 2017 on
November 17, 2015. A Final Plat extension was approved until January 19,
2017 on November 17, 2015.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Sections 5.04 and 5.05 of the Subdivision Ordinance (Ordinance No. 483)
regulate private streets such as the proposed Saddleback Lane. There is
no provision in the Subdivision Ordinance for a residential street to be built
as private; any such street must first be constructed to City standards and
publically-dedicated until such time as 75% or more of the lots within the
platted subdivision are owner-occupied (§5.04A). At such time as 75% of
lots within the platted subdivision are owner-occupied, a petition for
previously-dedicated public streets to become private streets must be
ratified by 100% of the owners within the subdivision for the street to
become private. The City Council must then approve the change for the
transfer to occur.
The applicant requests a variance to allow initial construction of a private
street (Saddleback Lane) with no dedication to the City, along with a
variance from the requirement that 75% of lots within the subdivision be
owner-occupied prior to petition for a private street.
In its consideration of whether to grant an application for private streets,
§5.04B requires the City Council to determine whether private streets
would:
1. Negatively affect traffic circulation on public streets;
2. Impair access to or from properties of future developments either
on-site or off-site to the subdivision;
3. Impair access to or from public facilities including schools or parks;
4. Delay the response time of emergency vehicles;
5. Replace streets shown on the adopted Thoroughfare Plan;
6. Impede or cross an existing or proposed street as shown on the
City’s Thoroughfare Plan or any approved Preliminary or Final
Plats;
7. Disrupt an existing or proposed City public pedestrian pathway, hike
and bike trail, equestrian trail, or park as shown on the City’s most
recent Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan or Trail
System Master Plan; or
8. Negatively impact the continuity or sense of community in the City
as a whole.
The Thoroughfare Plan shows W Bob Jones Rd to be a 70’ C2U Collector.
An additional 30 feet of right of way for Bob Jones Rd is shown on the
Preliminary Plat and will be dedicated with the Final Plat.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 15-151 Page 2
PATHWAYS
MASTER PLAN:
The Pathways Plan shows a future mixed use
trail with a minimum 8’ width running diagonally
across the property between N White Chapel
Blvd and W Bob Jones Road. The proposed plat
indicates an 8 foot mixed use trail running across
the south boundary of the property along Bob
Jones Road
5’ sidewalks are shown along Saddleback Lane
within the development and will allow for public
access from W Bob Jones Road.
WATER & SEWER:
Water: An 8 inch water line will be extended approximately 500 feet along
the north boundary of W Bob Jones Road from an existing 12 inch water
line at N White Chapel Blvd to the boundary of the property. An 8 inch
water line will be extended into the subdivision along proposed Saddleback
Lane. An 8 inch line will be looped back to the 12 inch line in N. White
Chapel Boulevard about 1,200 feet into the subdivision. The 8 inch line will
extend another 1000 feet as a dead end line with a fire hydrant at the
terminus.
Sanitary Sewer: Lots will be served by an 8 inch sanitary sewer line which
will gravity flow to a lift station at the central eastern boundary of the
subdivision and N White Chapel Boulevard. A 4 inch sanitary sewer force
main will be extended from the lift station approximately 2,236 feet to the
intersection of King Ranch Road and N White Chapel. Public Improvement
Plans for Saddleback Ridge Estates were reviewed in conjunction with the
rezoning to SF-1A (ZA06-029) and approved in 2007. To mitigate concerns
with the longer cul-de-sac and gated entry, each home is proposed to be
fitted with a sprinkler system.
rd
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS:
The southern 2/3 of the property drains to the east while the remaining
rd
1/3 drains to the north onto Army Corps of Engineers property and
ultimately to Grapevine Lake. Drainage from the Saddleback Ridge
development will primarily drain to the proposed street and be piped to two
on-site ponds on the east and west sides of the property.
TREE PRESERVATION:
The previously-approved Preliminary and Final Plats were reviewed under
Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-B. A 50 foot tree conservation area
was shown around the perimeter of the property, but no other trees were
proposed for conservation. Because the current proposal contains a major
change from the original, it is now considered under Ordinance No. 585-D,
which requires a tree survey and conservation plan.
According to the applicant’s survey, tree canopy coverage on the site is
34.4%. Under 585-D, the applicant is required to preserve at least 60% of
the canopy. The applicant’s Tree Conservation Plan preserves 60-61.7% of
the existing canopy, with some trees shown as marginal. The highest
concentration of existing and preserved trees lies within the northern
portion of the property, which is designated as an area to be preserved on
the City’s 2015 Sustainability Master Plan (Ordinance No. 1104).
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 15-151 Page 3
STAFF COMMENTS:
Attached is Preliminary Plat Review #2, dated April 1, 2016.
N:\\Community Development\\MEMO\\2015 Cases\\151 - PP - Saddleback Ridge Estates\\Staff Report\\ZA15-151 Staff Report PZ
4-7-16.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 15-151 Page 4
Vicinity Map
Case No. Attachment B
ZA 15-151 Page 1
Previously Approved Preliminary Plat
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 15-151 Page 1
Proposed Preliminary Plat
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 15-151 Page 2
Tree Conservation Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 15-151 Page 3
Property at existing Bob Jones Rd entrance
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 15-151 Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 15-151 Page 5
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 15-151 Page 6
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 15-151 Page 7
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 15-151 Page 8
Variance Exhibit
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 15-151 Page 1
SPIN MEETING REPORT
SPIN Item Number:
SPIN2016-05
Planning Case Number:
ZA15-151
Project Name:
Saddleback Ridge Estates
SPIN Neighborhood:
SPIN # 1
Meeting Date:
February 9, 2016
Meeting Location:
1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance:
Thirty-five (35)
Host:
David Alexander, Community Engagement Committee
Applicant(s) Presenting:
Tom LaHoda, et al 3
City Staff Present:
Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I
City Staff Contact:
David Jones, Principal Planner – 817-748-8070 or
djones@ci.southlake.tx.us
Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on “Learn More” under
Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date.
FORUM SUMMARY
Property Situation:
32-one acre lots located at 330-360 W. Bob Jones Rd. and 4640 N. White Chapel Blvd.
Development Details:
Saddleback Ridge Estates was approved as a 32-lot SF-1A single family residential subdivision in
June 2006. Since that time, extensions to the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat have been approved
multiple times in order to maintain their validity.
The currently proposed Preliminary Plat varies from the previously approved in that it proposes a
private street as part of the plat. The previous plat was approved with a single public street
accessing from W Bob Jones Road.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA 15-151 Page 1
The current plan continues the overall layout of the 2006 plan, with 32 lots accessed by a single
divided street with a gated entry feature. A guard house is not initially planned, but space is
allocated within the entry area for a future guard house.
The perimeter of the development will be bounded by a 6’ board on board cedar fence along the
east and west sides with a 6’ wrought tubular iron fence on the north (back) side of the property
and a combination of dry stacked stone wall and brick pillars at the entry from W Bob Jones
Road, with the remainder of the northern boundary enclosed with split rail fencing.
Average lot price estimated to be about $550,000
Exhibits presented at SPIN:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA 15-151 Page 2
Case No. Attachment E
ZA 15-151 Page 3
Case No. Attachment E
ZA 15-151 Page 4
Case No. Attachment E
ZA 15-151 Page 5
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS:
I am concerned about the proposed City Land Use for 5-acre minimum lots. I have no issue with
1-acre development. It sounds like the 5-acre may get nixed or may reduce to 3. I don’t want to
see this changed… everyone should be able to have 1 acre.
What about drainage?
We have no plans to alter the previously approved drainage plan. We have a
o
comprehensive master drainage plan that is over and above what the city required.
Since the original SPIN meeting, property ownership has changed. You should reach out to folks
that aren’t here tonight.
I have sent emails… I will reach out again.
o
Meeting adjourned 6:41 P.M.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting
minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses
made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case
through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA 15-151 Page 6
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA15-151 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 04/01/16
Preliminary Plat – Saddleback Ridge Estates
Project Name:
APPLICANT/OWNER: Tom LaHoda LEAD: Jimmy Fechter, PLA
Spectra Land, LP Adams Engineering & Development Consultants
PO Box 699 8951 Cypress Waters Boulevard
Colleyville, Texas 76034 Dallas, Texas 75019
(817) 233-2323 (817) 328-3200
jimmy.fechter@adams-engineering.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
03/21/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER.
David P. Jones, AICP
E-mail: djones@ci.southlake.tx.us
Principal Planner
Phone: (817) 748-8070
1. A Final Plat which conforms to the Preliminary Plat and underlying zoning district must be
processed and recorded prior to conveyance of any lots or the issuance of any building permits.
2. The Southlake 2030 Pathways Master Plan adopted January 7, 2014 shows a future multi-use
trail running diagonally across this property. A multi-use trail is intended to be no narrower than 8’
in width. Staff recommends submitting an alternate plan which shows an access easement for the
mixed-use trail to run across the property as shown. In lieu of an alternate plan, you must provide
written justification for leaving the trail off of the proposed plat.
3. Private streets are only permitted in accordance with Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.04, which
requires a street to be dedicated to the City unless and until 75% or more of the lots within the
subdivision are owner-occupied. In order to build the private street as proposed, a variance is
required which would allow a private street to be constructed prior to owner-occupancy of 75% or
more of platted lots. The request for variance is confusingly worded and should request a
variance from the requirement in Section 5.04 rather than “in accordance with” Section 5.04.
VARIANCE REQUESTED.
4. If the variance for private street is granted, the 110’ private right of way (shown as lot 35) must be
dedicated to a property or owners’ HOA as a “Private Access, Emergency Access, Drainage and
Utility Easement.”
5. Amend sidewalk from 4’ to 5’.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 15-151 Page 1
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. As on the previously approved plan, 50’ Tree Preservation Buffers have been provided along the
north, east, and west property boundary lines but existing trees are proposed to be removed
within the Tree Preservation Buffers on Lots 11, 12, 27, and 28, for the construction of
Detention/Retention ponds. The trees within designated tree preservation areas are required to
be preserved during and after development of the property.
2. The hatching designating the Tree Preservation Buffer on Lots 27 and 28 is shown to be an
additional 50’ further into the lots. Unless an additional 50’ of Tree Preservation Buffer is being
proposed, keep the hatching consistent.
3. On the Tree Conservation Plan there is a note that references an SP Zoning Document for the
tree preservation allowance. There is no SP Zoning Document to reference.
* There is approximately 34.4% of existing tree cover on the site and 60% of that tree cover is
required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 61.7% of the existing tree cover
and 1.7% of the tree cover is designated as marginal for removal.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree
cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the
zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 15-151 Page 2
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do
not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. The previous council motion required that 4 inch caliper trees be provided on each lot, that the
developer will provide 6 inch caliper trees within the Private Landscape Easement medians within
the street right-of-way, and that Eastern Red Cedar were to be planted on the developing
property adjacent to the southwest corner of Showtime Farms property (Lot 24 and Lot 25, Block
1). Please verify if these items are still proposed to be provided.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steven Anderson, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
New Requirement:
1. Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan
must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake
especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to
prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly
recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one
map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during
vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to
the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and
removal of controls.
NEW REQUIREMENT:
2. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
3.
Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by
a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
4. The sidewalk adjacent to the 100 L.F. Masonry Wall is somewhat irregular. Staff suggests the
sidewalk meander in to the “right of way” towards back-of-curb in a more fluid fashion as opposed
to a 90º angle. Sidewalk along back-of-curb shall be 5 feet wide.
*
A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 15-151 Page 3
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on
the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
* Public improvement plans were reviewed and approved in 2007.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Assistant Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Street name needs to be approved by the city prior to final plat. Submit proposed name and
alternate name as soon as possible.
2. Developments of single family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be
provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. (Unless all dwelling units
are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system)
3. The gated entry, if approved, must be equipped with an Opticom or KS-2 switch for opening the
gate electronically, as well as a means for manual opening.
4. Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus (A minimum of 85,000 lbs GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft. back of
curb to back of curb. (Standard street width) (Plans do not indicate appropriate street widths;
appear to be 24 feet wide)
General Informational Comments
* All sidewalks within a private lot or open space area need to be placed in a pedestrian access
easement.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 15-151 Page 4
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 15-151 Page 5
Surrounding Property Owners
SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response
1. BASHIR, KAMRAN & MARLA SF1-A Low Density Residential 0.15400000 NR
2. BASHIR, KAMRAN & MARLA SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.44500000 NR
3. BOWER, KEVIN R SF1-A Low Density Residential 4.84200000 NR
4. CARNEY, TOM P SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.51900000 NR
5. EMERY, MARTIN & MINDY K SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.32200000 NR
6. EMMER, DANIEL P SF1-A Low Density Residential 4.63854252 F
7. EVANS, MARZELL F TR AG Low Density Residential 5.34336454 NR
8. FLYNT, JASON & LINDSAY SF1-A Low Density Residential 2.04800000 NR
9. JONES, ANDREW & KENLYN SF1-A Low Density Residential 3.01700000 NR
10. LAMON, CHRISTOPHER R & JANE AG Low Density Residential 3.65400000 NR
11. LAMON, CHRISTOPHER R & JANE SF1-A Low Density Residential 4.44000000 NR
12. LEGACY LIMITED, LLC RE Low Density Residential 10.44900000 NR
13. LEGACY LIMITED, LLC AG Low Density Residential 6.47835177 NR
14. MAHONE, MATTHEW & LEIGH ANNE SF1-A Low Density Residential 3.70619666 NR
15. MILANI, JOHN C & CHRISTEN AG Low Density Residential 9.70600000 NR
16. REISING, MAX AG Low Density Residential 2.54224187 NR
17. ROBINSON, RALPH & WILMA AG Low Density Residential 3.09500000 NR
18. ROBINSON, RALPH & WILMA AG Low Density Residential 2.42900000 NR
19. SHOWTIME FARMS INC AG Low Density Residential 10.00800000 U
Case No. Attachment G
ZA 15-151 Page 1
20. SPECTRA LAND LP SF1-A Low Density Residential 17.70500000 NR
21. SPECTRA LAND LP SF1-A Low Density Residential 11.72800000 NR
22. SPECTRA LAND LP SF1-A Low Density Residential 5.33200000 NR
23. SPECTRA LAND LP SF1-A Low Density Residential 4.99600000 NR
24. SPECTRA LAND LP SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.02100000 NR
25. WHITE, THOMAS W AG Low Density Residential 36.23200000 O
26. Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR
27. Superintendent of Grapevine NR
Colleyville ISD
28. Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR
29. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
-----
Notices Sent:
Twenty-nine (29)
Responses Received:
In favor: One (1) Opposed: One (1) Undecided: One (1)
Case No. Attachment G
ZA 15-151 Page 2
Case No. Attachment G
ZA 15-151 Page 3
Case No. Attachment G
ZA 15-151 Page 4
Case No. Attachment G
ZA 15-151 Page 5