Item 15 - ZA15-153 - PP - Stone Trail Estates
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 29, 2016
CASE NO: ZA15-153
PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Stone Trail Estates
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
Terra/Manna, LLC is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Stone Trail Estates
to develop 65 residential lots and 11 open space lots on approximately 36.03
acres described as Tracts 5A, 5C1, 5B, 5A3, and 5A2, Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract
No. 18, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lots 3R, 5B and 5A (5A and 5B
being portions of Lot 5) Brock Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas and located at 2607, 2621, 2631, 2641, and 2651 W. Southlake Blvd.
and 250, 400 and 410 Brock Dr., Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #11.
REQUEST
DETAILS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Stone Trail Estates to
develop 65 residential lots and 11 open space lots on approximately 36.03 acres. The
plat is being processed in association with a Zoning Change and Development Plan
(ZA15-152) from “AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential
District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development for Stone Trail Estates. The
proposed gross density is 1.80 du/ac. and the proposed net density is approximately
2.09. du/ac.
Site Data Summary
Number of Residential Lots 65
Number of Open Space Lots 11
Gross Acreage 36.03
Gross Density 1.80 du/acre
Net Acreage 31.13
Net Density 2.09 du/acre
Open Space Acreage 8.98
Open Space Percentage 24.92%
The majority of the site is designated “Medium Density Residential”, which is suitable
for any single-family detached residential development. Approximately 6.77 acres of
the proposed developement that is currently in the Brock Additions has a Low Density
Residential designation in the 2030 Land Use Plan. The number of lots in that portion
of the subdivision does not comply with the Low Density Residential designation, which
requires a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre, so a Comprehensive
Land Use Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential is also being requested under case number CP15-004.
VARIANCES
Case No.
ZA15-153
REQUESTED:
1. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1 requires a minimum
distance from a residential driveway to an intersection of 250’. The applicant is
requesting a variance to allow the proposed street intersection on W,.
Southlake Blvd. to be located approximately 199’ from the existing church
driveway to the west.
2. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 53.03(K) permits dead
end streets only where a future extension or connection is to be made. The
applicant is proposing that Naples Dr, at the southern end of the development
be gated for emergency access only.
Variance Approval Criteria has been included in Attachment ‘A’, pages 3-4 of this
report.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) consider approval of a Preliminary Plat
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Corridor Committee Meeting Report
(D) SPIN Meeting Report
(E) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint
(F) Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated January 29, 2016
(G) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
for Commission and Council Members Only
(H) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Dennis Killough (817)748-8072
Richard Schell (817)748-8602
Case No.
ZA15-153
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Terra/Manna, LLC
OWNERS:
Margaret J. Haney and Sandra Lynn Bagwell
PROPERTY LOCATION:
Generally located south of W. Southlake Blvd. and west and south of Brock Dr.
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION:
Tracts 5A, 5C1, 5B, 5A3, and 5A2, Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18,
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lots 3R, 5B and 5A (5A and 5B
being portions of Lot 5) Brock Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential
PROPOSED LAND USE
CATEGORY:
Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING:
“AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District
REQUESTED ZONING:
“R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District
HISTORY:
- The propertywas annexed into the City in 1956 and given the “AG”
Agricultural District zoning designation.
- A Plat Showing for Brock Addition was filed November 8, 1967.
- The “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District zoning was placed on the
Brock Addition property with the adoption of Ordinance No. 480 and the Official
Zoning Map in September of 1989.
- A Plat Revision for Lots 1R and 3R, Brock Addition was approved September
2, 1997 and filed November 21, 1997.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN:
Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The majority of the site is designated “Medium Denisty Residential”, which is
suitable for any single-family detached residential development. Approximately
6.77 acres of the proposed developement that is currently in the Brock
Additions has a “Low Density Residential” designation in the 2030 Land Use
Plan. The number of lots in that portion of the subdivision does not comply with
the “Low Density Residential” designation, which requires a net density of one
or fewer dwelling units per acre, so a Comprehensive Land Use Plan
amendment from “Low Density Residential” to “Medium Density Residential” is
also being requested under case number CP15-004.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows W. Southlake Blvd. to be a
Farm-to-Market road with 130’ of right of way Adequate right of way is shown
to be dedicated on the plans.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Master Plan shows the existing 8’ multi-use trail along the south
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-153 Page 1
side of Southlake Blvd. and a future ≥8’ multi-use trail extending from W.
Southlake Blvd. to Union church Rd. through the floodplain.
Major Corridors Urban Design Plan
The property is in the “Estate Residential” zone in the Major Corridors Urban
Design Plan. The following recommendations pertain to the “Estate
Residential” zone in the plan.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The development shows one street access onto W. Southlake Blvd., which is
currently a six lane divided arterial. The traffic counts are below.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-153 Page 2
W. Southlake Blvd.
(between Davis Blvd. & S. Pearson Ln.)
24hr East Bound (18,836) West Bound (18,766)
Peak AM (2,075) Peak AM (1,110)
AM
7:00 AM – 8:00 AM 11:30 AM – 12:30 PM
Peak PM (1,137) Peak PM (2,122)
PM
5:45 PM– 6:45 PM 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM
* Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
AM-AM-PM-PM-
Use Lots Vtpd*
IN OUT IN OUT
Single Family Residential (210) 65 622 13 37 42 24
Vehicle Trips Per Day
*
* AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour of generator on a weekday
th
* Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 Edition
WATER & SEWER:
The property proposes to connect to an existing 12” water line in W. Southlake
Blvd. to the north and to an existing 8” water line in Naples Dr. to the south. A
stub out is proposed to the property to the Watermere Addition to the west.
Sanitary sewer for the development is proposed to connect to an existing 8”
sewer line in Naples Dr to the south. A stub out is proposed to the property to
the east.
TREE PRESERVATION:
For property sought to be zoned R-PUD, the City Council shall consider the
application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (see below). The applicant is proposing
to preserve 51.52% of the existing tree cover. The existing tree cover is shown
to be 40.23% and if the case was for straight zoning, a minimum 50% of the
existing tree cover would be required to be preserved.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW:
This project was discussed at the 2030 Corridor Committee Meeting on
December 2, 2015. The meeting report is included as Attachment C of this
report.
A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on September 22,
2015. A SPIN Report is included as Attachment D of this Staff Report.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated January 29, 2016.
Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Section 8.2 VARIANCES AND APPEALS: Any
applicant who desires a variance or elimination of the requirements herein, or
who desires to appeal a decision of the Director regarding modifications to this
ordinance shall file a written appeal to the Director who shall place the request
on the agenda for consideration by the City Council. The City Council shall
have the authority to grant a variance to this ordinance. In granting any
variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the
regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on
the applicant, that the situation causing unnecessary hardship or practical
difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-153 Page 3
variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted
development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will
be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The decision of the
City Council shall be final.
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 9.01 Modifications and Variations: A.
Compliance: Where the Council finds that compliance with these regulations
would cause unusual hardship or extraordinary difficulties because of
exceptional and unique conditions of access, location, shape, size, drainage,
or other physical features of the site, the requirements may be modified to
mitigate the hardship, provided that the public interest is protected and the
development is in keeping with the general spirit and intent of this ordinance.
1) This section shall not be interpreted to permit the development of land
which is inherently unsuitable for the use proposed.
2) Any modification will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions
of this ordinance.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-153 Page 4
Case No. Attachment B
ZA15-153 Page 1
2030 Corridor Committee Meeting Report
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-153 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-153 Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-153 Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-153 Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-153 Page 5
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-153 Page 1
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-153 Page 2
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-153 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-153 Page 4
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-153 Page 1
PRELIMINARY PLAT
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-153 Page 2
TREE CONSERVATION PLAN
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-153 Page 3
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-153 Page 4
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-153 Page 5
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-153 Page 6
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-153 Page 7
Development Plan Review Summary
ZA15-152Two01/29/16
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Development Plan– Stone Trail Estates
Project Name:
APPLICANT: Paul Spain PLANNER: Curtis Young
Terra/manna, LLC Sage Group, Inc.
101 Clariden Ranch Rd. 1130 N. Carroll Ave.
Southlake, TX 76092 (817) 424-2626
Phone: (817) 410-9201 Phone:
E-mail: E-mail:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
01/29/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. Lot 3R in the Brock Addition is shown to be included in the R-PUD zoning district. Please include
specific setbacks for that lot in the R-PUD regulations if the lot will retain the same setbacks as it
currently has in the “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District.
2. Please assign each open space lot a unique lot number.
3. Please add specific language describing the use and maintenance of Open Space Lot 18. The
open space lot contains a driveway for the garage on Lot 4, Brock Addition. Please be specific on
the maintenance responsibilities of the driveway, fencing and landscaping, including irrigation on
that lot. Since the lot is fenced off from the rest of the development, please also be specific as to
the access rights to the lot by the public and by the residents of Stone Trail Estates. The note on
the Development Plan states that open space lots are open to the public. If the lot is not to be
open for anyone to use, then it needs to be removed from the open space area provided and
renamed something else.
* All driveways/points of ingess/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended). A minimum spacing of 500’ is required for the minimum distance from a commercial
driveway ( a church is considered commercial property in the Driveway Ordnance definition) to an
intersection along W. Southlake Blvd., but that spacing may be reduced to 250’ for right-in/right-out
driveways. A variance letter has been submitted requesting a variance to Driveway Ordinance No.
634, as amended, to allow a spacing of 199’ to the Lakeside Presbyterian Church driveway to the
west.
* Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 53.03(K) permits dead end streets only
where a future extension or connection is to be made. Please add a variance request to the
variance letter requesting a variance to allow Naples Dr, at the southern end of the development to
be gated for emergency access only.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-153 Page 1
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. A storm sewer is proposed within the 4’ Drainage and Utility Easement on Lot 23 which cuts through
the protected trees on the lot. Designate the area within the easement to be “Marginal” to avoid tree
mitigation.
* A Tree Conservation Analysis was submitted. For property sought to be zoned R-PUD, the City
Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (see below). The applicant is proposing to preserve 51.52% of
the existing tree cover. The existing tree cover is shown to be 40.23% and if the case was for straight
zoning, a minimum 50% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously
received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the
first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be
preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public
rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for
a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as
established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve
the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to
maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental
Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas
from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-153 Page 2
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage
creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets
as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved
Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved
by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities,
structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing
trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD COMMENTS:
1. A 20’ – B type bufferyard was previously proposed to be provided adjacent to W. Southlake Blvd. with
a reduction in the required plantings for the increased width. For single family zoned developments
adjacent to Southlake Blvd. a 20’ – L type bufferyard is required and it is now shown on the plan. The
chart is still showing a reduction in plantings provided for the increase in bufferyard width, which is no
longer the case. Please provide the required plant materials for the 20’ – L type bufferyard.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Om Chhetri, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8089
E-mail: ochhetri@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. Per the City of Southlake driveway ordinance 634, a deceleration lane is required. The site peak period
ingress movement is greater than 40 veh/ hr (41 veh/hr per Kimley-horn memo). Due to the
geographical challenges with respect to the distance to the adjacent western church driveway, a
shorter deceleration lane, than TxDOT requirements, may be required. This requirement will be
contingent on TxDOT’s willingness to amend their access requirement. A future deceleration lane is
also proposed at the Lakeside Presbyterian church with phase II of the development.
3. Show any proposed sidewalks in the site plan.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
* Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-153 Page 3
* Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found
in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. A comparison of Tc’s in itself cannot be accepted as justification for waiving detention. The Engineer
should update the HEC-1 model to demonstrate the impacts of hydrograph timing. If this study
indicates no increase in peak discharge, the detention requirement can be waived. If during final
design a detention pond was deemed required, the applicant may be required to revise to the
concept/site/development plan and obtain approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the
City Council.
2. Include a pre-developed conditions drainage area map/calculations and provide calculations that
demonstrate no adverse impact in post-project conditions as a result of development within basin A-1.
* LOMR shall be obtained prior to acceptance of the subdivision.
* Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards.
The proposed flume will not be allowed.
* Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure may require a fee to be paid prior to beginning
construction.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the
Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review.
The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and
general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-
construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-
8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on
the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-153 Page 4
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Assistant Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Subdivision street names to be approved by city prior to final plat. Submit proposed names and
alternate names as soon as possible.
The gated entry, if approved, must be equipped with an Opticom or KS-2 switch for opening the
gate electronically, as well as a means for manual opening.
Community Service/Parks Department Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
817-748-8607
pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee
payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further
details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park
land for every forty (40) dwelling units.
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the
amount of $3000 per dwelling unit x 65 dwelling units = $195,000. $6000 credit will be given for two existing
dwellings.
Pathway Comments:
Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian
access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide
4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and
Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements.
Other informational comments?
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting for this development was held on September 22, 2015.
* Properties within Corridor Overlay Zone see Ord. 480-S § 43.9.c.1(e) for design criteria. Zoning
Ordinance No. 480, Section 39.5(4) requires fences along W. Southlake Blvd. to comply with the
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-153 Page 5
Architectural Fencing requirements of the Corridor Overlay District. (Section43.9(c)1(f), which
“All architectural fencing which runs roughly parallel to the SH 114, Carroll Ave.FM 1709,
states
FM 1938, rights of way shall be constructed of the primary materials of the building, wrought iron
or living plant material. It shall not run in a straight line without being offset by a minimum of 6 feet
every 60 feet. It shall be located no closer to the right of way than one half the width of the
required bufferyard.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* The proposed street connection on Southlake Blvd. requires TXDOT approval.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-153 Page 6
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Stone Trail Estates
SPO Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
#
1. NADO I LLC SP1 2530 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.92 NR
2. NADO I LLC SP1 2580 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.71 NR
3. BONOLA FAMILY LTD PRTNSHP SF1-A 2608 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.78 NR
4. HALL, JERRY G SF1-A 102 JELLICO CIR 1.24 F
5. WIESMAN, E I AG 2607 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.88 NR
6. QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 109 BROCK DR 0.58 NR
7. VARGAS, PERRY W SF1-A 209 BROCK DR 1.14 NR
8. HOWARD, EMMA L SF1-A 303 BROCK DR 1.13 NR
9. WIESMAN, E I AG 2641 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.39 NR
10.MCCALL, MARIE C SF1-A 320 BROCK DR 1.33 U
11.KUELBS, GREGORY G RE 500 DAVIS BLVD 5.50 NR
12.PAPILLARD, MARJORIE S SF1-A 319 BROCK DR 0.67 NR
13.PAPILLARD, MARJORIE A SF1-A 329 BROCK DR 0.74 NR
14.HANEY, ARVEL W EST SF1-A 400 BROCK DR 4.84 NR
15.KUELBS, GREGORY G RE 504 DAVIS BLVD 2.03 NR
16.LOWMAN, MIKE SF20A 711 PORTOFINO PL 0.47 NR
17.FRANKS, NINA SF20A 700 VENICE AVE 0.47 NR
18.BEENE, LORI DAMRON SF20A 719 PORTOFINO PL 0.46 NR
19.FAZEN, MARK A SF20A 720 PORTOFINO PL 0.46 NR
20.HARIDAS, RAGHAVEN SF20A 701 VENICE AVE 0.46 NR
21.POTEET, THOMAS AG 2435 MICHAEL DR 0.55 NR
22.C&T LAWNS LLC AG 2440 MICHAEL DR 1.13 NR
23.STRAND, VERLO J AG 2420 MICHAEL DR 1.13 NR
Case No. Attachment G
ZA15-153 Page 1
24.C&T LAWNS LLC AG 2425 MICHAEL DR 1.11 NR
25.SMYTH, HENRY C SP2 301 WATERMERE DR 6.37 NR
26.MULLENIX, DAVID W SF20A 701 PORTOFINO PL 0.59 NR
27.SMYTH, HENRY C SP2 301 WATERMERE DR 8.90 NR
28.WIESMAN, E I AG 2651 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 13.18 NR
29.LAKESIDE PRESBYTERAN CHURCH CS 2701 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 7.43 NR
30.KUELBS, GREGORY G SF1-A 684 DAVIS BLVD 5.00 NR
31.JOHNSON, GEORGE AG 2390 MICHAEL DR 1.13 NR
32.WIESMAN, E I AG 2621 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.22 NR
33.WIESMAN, E I AG 2631 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.50 NR
34.HANEY, ARVEL W EST SF1-A 410 BROCK DR 1.70 NR
35.BYLER, JOHN R SF20A 705 PORTOFINO PL 0.46 NR
36.FARAGHER, JACK SF20A 707 PORTOFINO PL 0.47 NR
37.YOUNG, MICHAEL M SF20A 715 PORTOFINO PL 0.52 NR
38.QUINN, WILLIAM AG 2445 MICHAEL DR 0.57 NR
39.COUCH, BOBBIE JOE SF2 829 SIENA DR 2.37 NR
40.SOUTHLAKE CHURCH OF CHRIST CS 2417 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.82 NR
41.WIESMAN, E I SF1-A 250 BROCK DR 1.53 NR
42.BUCY, DOROTHY HALLMARK SP1 2419 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.28 NR
43.QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 105 BROCK DR 0.51 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent:
Forty-three (43)
Responses Received
Within 200’:
Two (2) – Attached
Case No. Attachment G
ZA15-153 Page 2
Case No. Attachment G
ZA15-153 Page 3
Case No. Attachment G
ZA15-153 Page 4
Case No. Attachment G
ZA15-153 Page 5