Item 9 - ZA15-142 ZSP The Offices at Kimball Park
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 15, 2016
CASE NO: ZA15-142
PROJECT: Zoning Change & Concept/Site Plan for The Offices at Kimball Park
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
MDP Kimball Park, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site
Plan from S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District to S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District
for The Offices at Kimball Parkon property described as Tracts 3A1A and 3A2A,
Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
and located at 400 and 470 N. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: S-P-2
Generalized Site Plan District. Requested Zoning: S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District.
SPIN Neighborhood # 4.
REQUEST
DETAILS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan from S-P-2
Generalized Site Plan District to S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District for The Offices at
Kimball Park to revise the previously approved S-P-2 Zoning and Concept Plan for
Kimball Park and to seek approval of a Site Plan for an approximately 112,627 square
foot four-story office building and a one-level parking garage.
A Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan was approved March 4 for the Kimball Park
development, which included the four-story, 175 room Cambria Hotel and Suites that is
currently under construction, a three-story, 96,000 square foot office building,
restaurant, coffee shop and retail uses, and one open space lot on approximately 15.5
acres. A Site Plan was approved at that time for only for the Cambria Suites Hotel and
Suites.
The changes proposed with this request pertain only to Lot 3, which includes the office
building. There is currently only a Concept Plan for Lot 3, so this request is to amend
the S-P-2 zoning including the previously approved Concept Plan, and to seek
approval of a Site Plan for Lot 3. No changes are proposed to the remainder of the
Kimball Park development. All previous conditions of approval remain in effect.
A summary of the proposed changes to Lot 3 is below:
The proposed office building has increased from three stories to four stories
and the maximum height has increased from 54 feet to 62 feet.
The gross floor area of the office building has increased from 96,000 square
feet to approximately 112,627 square feet.
A one-level parking deck with 96 parking spaces has been added.
Case No.
ZA15-142
The number of parking spaces required on Lot 3 has been increased from 326
spaces to 440 spaces and the provided parking has increased from 326
spaces to 459 spaces (363 at grade spaces + 96 garage spaces).
An S-P-2 regulation has been added to allow the building articulation as shown
on the elevations. The north and south elevations of the office building and all
elevations of the parking garage as shown do not meet the horizontal and
vertical articulation requirements.
An S-P-2 regulation has been added to allow the painted concrete and metal
on the office building elevations and precast concrete panels for the parking
garage.
An S-P-2 regulation has been added to allow a bank drive-through on the west
side of the building. Separate approval of a Site Plan by City Council following
a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required prior to
issuance of a building permit for the drive-through.
A n S-P-2 regulation has been added to not require the additional interior
landscaping that would be required based on the square footage of the parking
garage.
VARIANCES
REQUESTED:
The following variances are requested and they were approved the original Zoning Change
and Concept Plan on March 4, 2014:
1)The driveways do not meet the minimum required stacking depth of 150’.
Approximately 17.6’ of stacking depth is shown on the N. Kimball Ave. driveway
and 34.2’ of stacking depth is shown on the S.H. 114 driveway.
2) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended, requires that
every lot front on a public or a private street. A variance is requested to allow the
lots to be configured as shown on the Concept Plan.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) SPIN Meeting Reports dated January 6, 2014
(D) Plans and Support Information – Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(E) Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 15, 2016
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
for Commission and Council Members Only
(G) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA15-142
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT:
MDP Kimball Park, LLC
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
400 and 470 N. Kimball Ave.
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION:
Tracts 3A1A and 3A2A, Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: “
S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
REQUESTED ZONING: “
S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
HISTORY: -
A Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan (ZA12-067) from “I-1” Light Industrial
District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District for Victory Lane was approved
by City Council on September 4, 2012.
- A Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan (ZA13-135) from ““S-P-2”
Generalized Site Plan District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District for
Kimball Park was approved by City Council on March 4, 2014.
- A Preliminary Plat (ZA13-136) for Kimball Park was approved by City Council
on March 4, 2014.
- A Final Plat for Kimball Park was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission on May 8, 2014.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA15-032) from ““S-P-2” Generalized Site
Plan District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District for revisions to the
Cambria Hotel Site Plan and Elevations was approved June 2, 2015.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis was submitted for the previously approved Kimball
Park development. An updated TIA is not required for this case.
TREE PRESERVATION:
No changes to the approved Tree Conservation Plan are proposed with this
request.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW:
A SPIN meeting for the entire Kimball Park project was held January 6, 2014. A
summary of that meeting is included in Attachment C of this report.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Attached is Concept/SiteSite Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 15,
2016. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council motions from the
original approval on March 4, 2014 are included below for reference:
Previous Planning and Zoning Commission motion:
January 9, 2014; Tabled to the January 23, 2014 P&Z meeting.
January 23, 2014; Tabled to the February 6, 2014 P&Z meeting.
February 6, 2014; Approved (5-0) subject to Revised Concept/Site Plan Review
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-142 Page 1
Summary No. 2 and Staff Report dated January 31, 2014, approving the two
variances requested: 1) The driveways do not meet the minimum required
stacking depth of 150’. Approximately 17.6’ of stacking depth is shown on the
N. Kimball Ave. driveway and 34.2’ of stacking depth is shown on the S.H. 114
driveway and 2) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended,
requires that every lot front on a public or a private street. A variance is
requested to allow the lots to be configured as shown on the Concept Plan and
noting the applicants willingness to address the following: 1) the entrance to
the hotel on the southeast corner of the hotel, 2) the parking and landscaping
on the east side of the hotel 3) the design and layout of the retail/restaurant
component around the circle with the potential for patio space on the southern
side of the building as well as the northern side, 4) clarify renderings of the
hotel 5) refine the renderings to more closely resemble the materials
anticipated being used, 6) place the fountain in the renderings and 7) add
pedestrian access from the hotel to the green space on the southeast portion
of the lot.
Previous City Council motions:
st
February 18, 2014; Approved at 1 reading (6-1) subject to the following
stipulations: approval of requested variances—driveway stacking depth and
Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public and private street access that will
be configured as shown on the concept plan; concept plan review summary
No. 3, dated February 11, 2014; understanding that applicant must come
forward before the second reading with the following matters to be
appropriately detailed and discussed (1) detailed entry feature on front
southeast corner of the hotel, which may include fountains, landscape islands
and detailed renderings of such, (2) regarding Lot 6, a detailed landscape plan
showing how that can be incorporated with the federal requirements to not
disturb the floodway, (3) discussion of the property owners agreement and
how that may work regarding the project, (4) detailed floor plans, more
specifically the first floor and within that floor plan a detail of the outdoor public
spaces and how those will be incorporated into the hotel, (5) also regarding Lot
6, noting what can be manicured to the extent to provide for periodic
maintenance within the floodway in connection with Lot 6 landscape detail and
provide detailed plant material for entire project, and (6) detailed renderings for
convention center from the Kimball approach which would also include traffic
circle.
nd
March 4, 2014; Approved at 2 reading (6-1) pursuant to the following:revised
concept plan review summary No. 3, dated February 26, 2014; approving
requested variances—driveway and minimum required stacking and
Subdivision Ordinance 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended, which requires
every lot to be on a public or private street and as requested to allow the lots to
be configured as shown on the revised concept plan; also noting the
requirements under this motion are pursuant to: (1) the revised renderings that
were presented to Council this evening; (2) the Declaration of Covenants,
Restrictions, and easements (CCR) as presented to Council in the application
this evening; (3) the revised landscape plan presented to Council; (4) the
revised permitted uses, as presented from Adams Engineering in their letter
dated March 4, 2014, noting that the drive-through service will only be allowed
for Lot 4; (5) also noting the balance of the concept plan for the buildings that
are not included in this site plan approval that it is Council’s expectation there
will be 100% masonry construction; (6) the permitted uses represented from
Adams Engineering that the food service hours of operations as noted in the
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-142 Page 2
application that “they will close no later than 11:00 p.m.” that it is Council’s
intention to have wording that mentions that it will be “no earlier than 11:00
p.m.; (7) the office building in the concept plan will be a four story construction
and that additional parking will be presented on the first level underneath the
building; (8) and pursuant to the revised concept/site plan as presented this
evening.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-142 Page 3
Case No. Attachment B
ZA15-142 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-142 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-142 Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-142 Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-142 Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-142 Page 5
S-P-2 REGULATIONS
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 1
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 2
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 4
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 5
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 6
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE REQUEST LETTER
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 7
APPROVEDOVERALL PLAN (MARCH 4, 2014)
PROPOSEDOVERALL PLAN
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 8
APPROVEDCONCEPT PLAN (MARCH 4, 2014)
PROPOSEDCONCEPT PLAN
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 9
PROPOSEDSITE PLAN
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 10
PREVIOUSLY APPROVEDRENDERINGS AND MATERIALS OF OFFICE BUILDING
(MARCH 4, 2014)
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 11
PROPOSED RENDERINGS
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 12
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 13
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 14
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 15
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 16
APPROVED TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (MARCH 4, 2014)
PROPOSEDTREE PRESERVATION PLAN
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 17
PROPOSEDLANDSCAPE PLAN
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 18
PROPOSEDLANDSCAPE PLANTINGS
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-142 Page 19
CONCEPT/SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA15-142Two01/15/16
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Site Plan
Project Name: – Kimball Park
APPLICANT: Jeff Medici ENGINEER: Jimmy Fechter
MDP Southlake Adams Engineering
1203 S. White Chapel Blvd. Ste. 100 910 S. Kimball Ave.
Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (214) 784-1617 Phone: (817) 328-3215
E-mail: E-mail:
jeffmedici@gmail.comjimmy.fechter@adams-engineering.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
01/05/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072.
1. Please make the following changes the Concept and/or Site Plans:
a. Please make the following changes to the impervious coverage and open space areas and
percentages in the table on the Concept Plan.
i. The open space area plus the impervious area should add to the net area for each
lot and for the total. The percentages of open space and impervious coverage
should total 100% for each lot and for the total. Please change the percentage of
impervious coverage for Lot 4 to 77% and change the percentage of open space for
Lot 5 to 21%.
2. Ordnance No. 480, Section 36.6 requires 3 loading spaces for office buildings 100,000 – 199,999
square feet in size. A regulation has been added to allow 2 loading spaces as shown on the
Concept and Site Plans.
3. Please make the following revisions to the elevations:
a. Please dimension and label the height of the building to the predominant parapet height on
the elevations and not to the roof height.
b. Add the written scale under the graphic scale (1/8” = 1’).
c. Please provide a material sample board of all exterior materials to be used.
4. The proposed office development is subject to the requirements in the Corridor and Residential
Overlay Districts except as noted in the S-P-2 regulations. The following Overlay requirements
have been modified in the S-P-2 regulations:
a. A regulation has been added to allow the vertical and horizontal articulation on the office
building as shown on the Site Plan. The north and south elevations do not meet the
horizontal and vertical articulation requirements.
b. Please include a regulation to allow the articulation on the parking garage as shown. None
of the garage elevations meet the horizontal and vertical articulation requirements.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-142 Page 1
c. A regulation has been added to allow painted concrete and metal screens as permitted
façade materials on the office building and precast concrete panels as a permitted façade
material on the garage.
5. The gross square footage shown on the Site Plan (S4.0) is 112,627 square feet and the gross
square footage show on the Master Plan and Site Plan in the Boka Powell set is 116,484 square
feet. Please revise the plans so that the same gross square footage is shown on all plans.
6. The number of parking spaces shown on the Site Plan (S4.0) is 459 and number of spaces shown
on the Site Plan in the Boka Powell set is 464. Please revise the plans so that the same number of
spaces is shown on all plans. Please also revise the drive lanes and parking spaces on the Boka
Powell plans to match the Site Plan (S4.0).
7. A bank teller zone is shown on the west side of the building on theBoka Powell Site Plan and an S-
P-2 regulation has been added to allow a teller drive-up lane and window on the west elevation.
The teller zone is shown in the location of proposed parking spaces, so please revise the parking
analysis to include the number of spaces to be provided if a drive-through is added for a bank.
Approval of a Site Plan by the City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and
Zoning Commission will be required to allow the addition of a drive-through and window.
Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Easements for Kimball Park was
8. The
approved with the original Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Kimball Park and it
remains in effect with this request unless otherwise noted.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* The submitted Tree Conservation Plan complies with the previously approved Tree Conservation Plan.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved
Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved
by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities,
structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing
trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Within the proposed Development Regulations the applicant is proposing to vary from the interior
landscape area and plant material that is required to be provided for the footprint area of the parking
garage. The interior landscape calculations indicate that enough landscape area is provided across
the site but the required plant material is not provided.
Parking garages shall be considered as building in accordance with Section 3.3 in the Landscape
Ordinance 544-B. Please include the building footprint area of the parking garage when calculating the
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-142 Page 2
interior landscape area and required plant material.
2. Not all of the parking landscape islands are 12’ width form back-of-curb to back-of-curb. Ensure
that parking landscape islands are at least 12- wide form back-of-curb to back-or-curb. Parking lot
islands shall have a minimum width of 12’ back-to-back if curbed or 13’ edge-to-edge if no curb is
intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall.
3. None of the required interior landscape or bufferyards shrubs are shown on the submitted Landscape
Plan.
4. The Development Regulations state that the western property line will be screened with a vegetated
screening of: existing plant material, required plantings and additional large shrubs and accent trees
that will achieve a solid screening of 8’ in height and will be shown on the landscape plan. The
plantings shown within the west bufferyard are only the minimal required plantings for the 5’ – A type
bufferyard and the shrubs are not shown. Most of the existing trees shown to be preserved are on the
property line, within a utility easement, and are partially the proposed developments and the adjoining
property owners. Based on the information that is provided, the proposed landscaping within the west
bufferyard does not seem to comply with the proposed Development Regulations.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E., CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
New Requirement:
2. Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must
include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially
reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution
(especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project
manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during
mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map
showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include
SWPPP shall be
timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls.
submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
NEW REQUIREMENT:
3. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a
registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building
Inspections Department prior to construction.
5. Traffic Impact Analysis on file for overall development. No update is required.
* Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-142 Page 3
in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
EASEMENTS:
1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
WATER COMMENTS:
1. Minimum size for water lines is 8”.
2. Commercial and industrial developments require fire hydrant spacing of 300’ maximum for non-
sprinkled buildings or 600’ for sprinkled buildings.
* Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way.
* The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc.
* X” water line on (street name) shall conform to the City’s water concept plan.
* Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
* Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
1. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8”. Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary
sewer system built to City standards.
2. Extend sanitary sewer to the eastern/western/northern/southern property line and provide sewer stub
to adjacent property.
3. Add a note: Private sanitary sewer services need a plumbing permit and must be inspected by building
inspections prior to burial.
* Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
* Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #XX and requires a fee to be paid prior to
beginning construction ($0.00/Acre).
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the
Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans
shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are
located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-
construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-142 Page 4
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114.
Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT
for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-
8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City
Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet, and a dry
standpipe for the two-story parking garage. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended) Submit
plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001. Phone
214-638-7599.
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system
can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If
the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be
in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is not
located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser.
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter
of buildings on a “hose-lay” basis for sprinkled buildings and within 150 feet of all exterior portions
of the perimeter of non-sprinkled buildings. Fire apparatus access shall be an all-weather surface,
asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A
minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Label fire lanes throughout the property; appear to be missing
around the parking garage)
Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius.
(Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4)
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with completely
sprinkled buildings. (Hydrant spacing does not meet the requirements; add hydrants as necessary
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-142 Page 5
around the parking garage)
Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems and standpipes must be within 100 feet of a
fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes. (FDC locations not indicated on plans)
Add FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection, and fire hydrants as necessary to meet
requirements for the office building and parking garage.
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting for Kimball Park was held January 6, 2014.
* A preliminary plat for the entire property that conforms to the site plan must be approved and a
final plat must be approved and filed prior to issuance of a building permit.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended, requires that every lot front on a
public or a private street. City Council approved a variance with the first Zoning Change and
Concept Plan application to allow the lots to be configured as shown.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of
lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
65
* It appears that this property lies within the LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones except where noted in the S-P-2 regulations.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* The Council motions for the previously approved Kimball Park development that was approved
September 4, 2012 is included below for reference:
* Denotes Informational Comment
* The Council motions for the previously approved S-P-2 Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for
the Kimball Park development that was approved March 4, 2014 is included below for reference:
Previous Planning and Zoning Commission motion:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-142 Page 6
January 9, 2014; Tabled to the January 23, 2014 P&Z meeting.
January 23, 2014; Tabled to the February 6, 2014 P&Z meeting.
February 6, 2014; Approved (5-0) subject to Revised Concept/Site Plan Review
Summary No. 2 and Staff Report dated January 31, 2014, approving the two
variances requested: 1) The driveways do not meet the minimum required
stacking depth of 150’. Approximately 17.6’ of stacking depth is shown on the
N. Kimball Ave. driveway and 34.2’ of stacking depth is shown on the S.H. 114
driveway and 2) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended,
requires that every lot front on a public or a private street. A variance is
requested to allow the lots to be configured as shown on the Concept Plan and
noting the applicants willingness to address the following: 1) the entrance to
the hotel on the southeast corner of the hotel, 2) the parking and landscaping
on the east side of the hotel 3) the design and layout of the retail/restaurant
component around the circle with the potential for patio space on the southern
side of the building as well as the northern side, 4) clarify renderings of the
hotel 5) refine the renderings to more closely resemble the materials
anticipated being used, 6) place the fountain in the renderings and 7) add
pedestrian access from the hotel to the green space on the southeast portion
of the lot.
Previous City Council motions:
st
February 18, 2014; Approved at 1 reading (6-1) subject to the following
stipulations: approval of requested variances—driveway stacking depth and
Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public and private street access that will
be configured as shown on the concept plan; concept plan review summary
No. 3, dated February 11, 2014; understanding that applicant must come
forward before the second reading with the following matters to be
appropriately detailed and discussed (1) detailed entry feature on front
southeast corner of the hotel, which may include fountains, landscape islands
and detailed renderings of such, (2) regarding Lot 6, a detailed landscape plan
showing how that can be incorporated with the federal requirements to not
disturb the floodway, (3) discussion of the property owners agreement and
how that may work regarding the project, (4) detailed floor plans, more
specifically the first floor and within that floor plan a detail of the outdoor public
spaces and how those will be incorporated into the hotel, (5) also regarding Lot
6, noting what can be manicured to the extent to provide for periodic
maintenance within the floodway in connection with Lot 6 landscape detail and
provide detailed plant material for entire project, and (6) detailed renderings for
convention center from the Kimball approach which would also include traffic
circle.
nd
March 4, 2014; Approved at 2 reading (6-1) pursuant to the following:revised
concept plan review summary No. 3, dated February 26, 2014; approving
requested variances—driveway and minimum required stacking and
Subdivision Ordinance 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended, which requires
every lot to be on a public or private street and as requested to allow the lots to
be configured as shown on the revised concept plan; also noting the
requirements under this motion are pursuant to: (1) the revised renderings that
were presented to Council this evening; (2) the Declaration of Covenants,
Restrictions, and easements (CCR) as presented to Council in the application
this evening; (3) the revised landscape plan presented to Council; (4) the
revised permitted uses, as presented from Adams Engineering in their letter
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-142 Page 7
dated March 4, 2014, noting that the drive-through service will only be allowed
for Lot 4; (5) also noting the balance of the concept plan for the buildings that
are not included in this site plan approval that it is Council’s expectation there
will be 100% masonry construction; (6) the permitted uses represented from
Adams Engineering that the food service hours of operations as noted in the
application that “they will close no later than 11:00 p.m.” that it is Council’s
intention to have wording that mentions that it will be “no earlier than 11:00
p.m.; (7) the office building in the concept plan will be a four story construction
and that additional parking will be presented on the first level underneath the
building; (8) and pursuant to the revised concept/site plan as presented this
evening.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-142 Page 8
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Kimball Park
SPO # Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response
HAGAR, STEPHEN T AG 479 N KIMBALL AVE 4.08
1. NR
CHAMATHIL, VARGHESE AG 411 N KIMBALL AVE 1.67
2. NR
INLAND WESTERN SLAKE
3. NR
CORNERS K C3 200 N KIMBALL AVE 16.71
ST LAURENCE EPISCOPAL
4. NR
CHURCH CS 517 N KIMBALL AVE 5.59
IVESTER, EMORY O AG 501 N KIMBALL AVE 3.62
5. NR
AOS INVESTMENTS GROUP INC O1 469 CHERRY LN 1.01
6. NR
FUSSELMAN, BRUCE C3 2100 E SH 114 1.80
7. NR
TATE, JOHN T SP2 2120 E SH 114 0.92
8. NR
MAYSE, RICHARD A SP2 2118 E SH 114 0.75
9. NR
SANDCO HOLDINGS LP SP2 420 N KIMBALL AVE 0.54
10. NR
TEXAS PETRO CORP III SP2 2150 E SH 114 1.16
11. F
JUNEJA, VIKAS RPUD 2201 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT 0.30
12. NR
CORP OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE FW AG 549 N KIMBALL AVE 0.94
13. NR
EQYINVEST OWNER II LTD LLP C3 2120 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 7.37
14. NR
HARRIS, KIMBERLY SUSAN SF1-A 700 CHERRY CT 0.94
15. NR
FIRST FINANCIAL TRUST & ASSET MF1 675 CHERRY LN 0.98
16. NR
VAN TIL, JOHN J MF1 625 CHERRY LN 1.01
17. NR
REYNAL, JOHN MF1 575 CHERRY LN 1.14
17 NR
HALIM, EMIL A MF1 725 CHERRY CT 0.96
18. NR
MDP SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 470 N KIMBALL AVE 9.33
19. NR
KIMBALL ROAD LP I1 500 N KIMBALL AVE 1.61
20. NR
ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO
21. NR
LLC CS 550 N KIMBALL AVE 2.55
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-142 Page 1
TDC MANAAGEMENT LLC SP2 560 N KIMBALL AVE 0.48
22. NR
LEE, K WAYNE SP2 566 N KIMBALL AVE 0.66
23. NR
BO-FAM INVESTMENTS LTD I1 450 N KIMBALL AVE 0.37
24. F
MDP SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 400 N KIMBALL AVE 6.13
25. NR
BO-FAM INVESTMENTS LTD I1 440 N KIMBALL AVE 0.32
26. F
CHERRY LANE PARTNERS LP O1 485 CHERRY LN 2.01
27. NR
KIMBALL LAKES PROPERTY
28. NR
OWNERS SP2 572 N KIMBALL AVE 0.39
HAGAR, STEPHEN T AG 479 N KIMBALL AVE 4.08
29. NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent Within 200’:
Twenty-nine (29)
Responses Received:
Two (2) - Attached
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-142 Page 2
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-142 Page 3
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-142 Page 4