Loading...
Item 6H CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT February 22, 2016 CASE NO: ZA15-138 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Southlake Meadows Phase III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: G&A Consultants, LLC is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Southlake Meadows Phase III to develop nine (9) residential lots and one (1)open space lot on approximately 8.88 acres on property described as Tracts 7A1, 7A2. 7A1A, 7A1A1 and 7B, being portions of Lot 7, R. P. Estes Subdivision and Tracts 1A and 1A1,James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 800, 848 and 812 W. State Hwy. 114, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Proposed Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN Neighborhood #5. REQUEST DETAILS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Southlake Meadows, Phase III to develop nine (9) residential lots and one (1) open space lot on approximately 8.88 acres. The property, which lies just to the north of the Southlake Meadows subdivision that is under constriction, was recently added to the City of Southlake in a Boundary Adjustment Agreement with the Town of Westlake. The property was given the "AG"Agricultural District zoning when it was added to the City. An associated request for a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Southlake Meadows Phase III from "AG"Agricultural District to"R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District to is being processed as Case No. ZA15-137. The property does not have a Land Use Plan designation, so a Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment to assign the Medium Density Residential designation is also being requested under case number CP15-003. The proposed gross density is approximately 1.01 dwelling units per acre and the proposed net density is approximately 1.02 units per acre. Site Data Summary 1/7 P&Z 2/2 and 3/1 CC Number of Residential Lots 9 9 Number of Open Space Lots 1 1 Gross Acreage 8.88 8.88 Gross Density 1.01 du/acre 1.01 du/acre Net Acreage 8.85 8.85 Net Density 1.02 du/acre 1.02 du/acre Open Space Acreage 2.76 2.94 Open Space Percentage 31% 33% Case No. ZA15-138 ACTION NEEDED: Consider approval of a Preliminary Plat ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Revised Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated February 22, 2016 (E) Surrounding Property Owner Responses (F) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817)748-8072 Richard Schell (817)748-8602 Case No. ZA15-138 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Maguire Partners — Solana Ltd. APPLICANT: G&A Consultants, LLC PROPERTY LOCATION: 800, 848 and 812 W. State Hwy. 114 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 7A1, 7A2. 7A1A, 7A1A1 and 7B, being portions of Lot 7, R. P. Estes Subdivision and Tracts 1A and 1A1,James B. Martin Survey,Abstract No. 1134 LAND USE CATEGORY: There is not currently a 2030 Land Use Designation on the property. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District. HISTORY: A plat for RP Estes Subdivision was filed with Tarrant County in 1947 prior to the property being added to the City. The property was added to the City of Southlake in 2015 in a Boundary Adjustment Agreement with the Town of Westlake and given the "AG" Agricultural District zoning designation. The following in a history of Phases I and II of Southlake Meadows to the south: A Land Use Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential and Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential for Savannah Estates (later changed to Phases I and 11 of Southlaike Meadows) was approved by City Council March 5, 2013. A Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA12-088) for Savannah Estates (later changed to Southlake Meadows) from "NR-PUD" Non Residential Planned Unit Development, "AG"Agricultural District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District was approved by City Council on March 5, 2013. A Preliminary Plat (ZA13-037) for Savannah Estates (later changed to Southlake Meadows) was approved June 4, 2013. A Plat Revision (ZA13-074) for Southlake MeadowsPhase I was approved November 21, 2013. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The site does not currently have a 2030 Land Use designation since it was recently added to the City in a Boundary Adjustment Agreement with the Town of Westlake. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Sam School Rd.to be a two lane undivided collector with 70' of right of way. Adequate right of way is shown to be dedicated on the plans. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan Case No. Attachment A ZA15-138 Pagel The Pathways Master Plan shows a>_8' multi-use trail planned along W. State Hwy. 114. The Pedestrian Access Plan shows an 8' trail through the Open Space lot from Sam School Rd. to the S. H. 114 right of way and along S. H. 114 south to connect to the 8' multi-use trail that was approved with the original R-PUD zoning. A 4' sidewalk is required along Sam School Rd. and Jamestown Ln. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The development shows one street access onto Sam School Rd., which is currently under construction as a two lane undivided collector with 70' of right of way. The traffic counts for this roadway are below. SchoolSam - . Kirkwood 24hr North Bound (747) South Bound (697) AM Peak AM (154)8:00—9:00 AM Peak AM (38) 11:45 AM— 12:45 PM PM Peak PM (76)5:00—6:00 PM Peak PM (92)5:45—6:45 PM *Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Trak Count Report Traffic Impact Use Lots .. OUT IN OUT Single Family Residential(210) 9 86 1 2 5 1 6 3 * Vehicle Trips Per Day *AM-In,AM-Out,PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour of generator on a weekday *Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition WATER & SEWER: The property will be served by an existing water line in Sam School Rd. Sanitary sewer for the development is proposed to connect to an existing 8" sewer line that runs along Jamestown Ln. in Southlake Meadows Phase II. TREE PRESERVATION: The Tree Preservation Plan shows that 50% of the existing canopy would be required to be preserved if this was a straight zoning case and 40.9% of the canopy is shown to be preserved. CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for the original Savannah Estates (later changed to Southlake Meadows) was held by the applicant on October 8, 2012. The applicant hosted a community meeting for the original Savannah Estates (later changed to Southlake Meadows)for concerned citizens on November 1, 2012 at Town Hall. The applicant hosted a community meeting for the original Savannah Estates (later changed to Southlake Meadows) for concerned citizens on January 3, 2013 at Town Hall. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: January 7, 2016; Approved (5-1) subject to the staff report dated January 7, 2016 and Revised Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated January 7, 2016. Case No. Attachment A ZA15-138 Page 2 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: February 2, 2016; A motion to table the item to the March 1, 2016 meeting was approved (5-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated February 22, 2016. Case No. Attachment A ZA15-138 Page 3 Vicinity Map 800, 812, 848 W. State Hwy. 114 ==Ed -LLLJ H I I ZA 15-138 Preliminary Plat Southlake Meadows Phase III 0 650 1 300 2,600 Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA1 5-138 Page 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART _ ••"_ � � Existing Zoning Agricultural Proposed Zoning R—PUD Existing Land Use None �•�_.. = —�— __--,r--fi Proposed Land Use Medium Density Residential • O Mi .." •R �� v, 'I 1, Acreage Gross 8.86 A -- � Proposed ROW Ded. 0.03 A (Sam School Road) Net 8.85 A Residential Lot Coverage 30% Maximum Area Percentage 8' trail connects sidewalk on Jamestown Ln. to Sam School Rd. Open Space 2.94 A 33.2% Building Footprint Area 3,000 SF Minimum (1—Story) i —•— -- _ -- 4,000 SF Minimum (2—Story) Proposed Lots l —�� TI Residential 9 f—v.--� i Propowd :RNID__ r_x: . I ProposedlW:IMMium I �, ' I i 1 HOA "X" Lots 2 i DZtF:11mtla1 Total Lots 11 1 1 .. o-"` aKmc 1 Residential Density 1.013 du/ac I(/ I r� r' i i' r• 9 i r• •+• i -+. ,a, is •., ni I!i \ •c'• Area Percentage Residential 5.91 A 66.8% 1 i : l 11i 111 III Ii i11 1 : i 11 __--J Lc_m•_J L__—_J L_—__J J �J.JrLMLJ L____ _.. . � `_�— __— nl. YN• Zoniiv:R-PUD ___ ___ UD::Me Denslry �__� I I r___- � I .... 1J� �.P.. IZA1 1St Case No. Attachment C ZA15-138 Page 1 PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT 'Ip BB•OP'IS"£BBI.l9' Town of Westlake �.a - y o wt oke mor TIF77 �xio i illI , I I I I , I ISI ISI I , I\ e. r al ' I xr —meg a 'I 'f"'I � I- I I I 1 1°•"'� I I I I I I I I I I I�' �� •^'"'° L—_--J L--J L=�_r�=J L--J L---J L— -J L--A James/ovm Lerg _ _ Z g'R-PUD name w. a. . LUD M dum4Denslty 'I ntm L__J L---j I __ I I I I I I I L -- L--J -- --- Case No. Attachment C ZA15-138 Page 2 REVISED PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA15-137 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 02/22/16 Project Name: Preliminary Plat— Southlake Meadows Phase III APPLICANT: Randi L. Rivera, AICP OWNER: Jack Dawson G&A Consultants, LLC Maguire Partners — Solana Land, LP 111 Hillside Drive 1800 Valley View Lane, Ste 300 Lewisville, Texas 75057 Farmers Branch, Texas 75234 Phone: (972) 436-9712 (469) 892-7200 E-mail: randi@gacon.com Jack@centurionamerican.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 02/18/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602. 1. The Preliminary Plat must conform to the proposed R-PUD district zoning. A Final Plat (or Plat Revision) that conforms to the Preliminary Plat and underlying zoning district must be processed and recorded prior to the conveyance of any lots or the issuance of any building permits. 2. The Pathways Master Plan shows an 8' multi-use trail along SH 114. The Development Plan shows an 8' trail through the eastern open space lot connecting Jamestown Ln. to the 8' multi-use trail in the open space lot adjacent to S.H. 114 that was approved with the original R-PUD zoning. That trail extends south to W. Dove. Rd. At the direction of City Council at the February 16, 2016 meeting, the applicant has added an 8' multi-use trail that extends from Jamestown Ln. to Sam School Rd. through the western open space lot. 3. Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.f requires all fencing that runs roughly parallel to S. H. 114 to be constructed of the primary masonry materials of the building, wrought iron or living plant materials. It shall not run in a straight line without being offset by a minimum of 6 feet every 60 feet. An R-PUD regulation has been added stating that the wrought iron that runs parallel to SH 114 is allowed as shown on the fence plan with no articulation. 4. If necessary, please add language regarding a gas pipeline to the Final Plat as required by the Gas Well Ordinance. Case No. Attachment D ZA15-138 Page 7 Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. A Tree Conservation Analysis was submitted with both the Development Plan and Preliminary Plat submittals. Since a Preliminary Plat was submitted in conjunction with the Development Plan, a Tree Conservation Plan is not required to be submitted. The plan shows that 50% of the existing canopy would be required to be preserved if this was a straight zoning case and 40.9% is shown to be preserved (see the comment below regarding tree cover requirements in R-PUD zoning districts. Please be aware that the percentage of canopy to be preserved shown on the plan must be shown to be preserved on the Tree Preservation Plan that is required with the Plat Revision. If the percentage of canopy to be preserved cannot be met at that time or at the time of construction, approval of a zoning change or a variance to the Tree Preservation Ordinance will be required. 2. Thirty (30) trees are proposed to be planted within the north green belt area as mitigation for tree removal. The tree species are Arizona Cypress and Eastern Red Cedar. Please revise the quantitites of each tree to 15 instead of 10 on the plan. Information required for Tree Conservation Plan: i. Identification of Critical Environmental Features of the site: A. All individually protected trees B. Existing streams, drainage creeks, ponds, and other water bodies (if any) ii. Tree Survey or alternative to a tree survey iii. 2-foot contour map of the site iv. Protected trees within the tree preservation area including tree size and type V. Critical Root Zones of groups of trees vi. Critical Root Zones for individual trees required for site plans only vii. Boundaries of any tree preservation areas as identified in the ERP Map viii. Identification of areas of environmental constraints not suitable for development ix. Identification of areas of minimal environmental constraints that are suitable for development X. Areas of encroachment into Critical Environmental Features identified on the site A. Clear delineation, for each protected tree, of whether the tree will be preserved after the proposed development is constructed, altered due to proposed improvements, or could potentially be saved based upon site specific conditions xii. Stream/Creek buffers, if any xiii. Detailed site plan of all proposed improvements. (All proposed improvements shall be required to be shown only at the site plan stage for all development. Preliminary plats shall, however, show building setbacks and general location of buildings and infrastructure.) xiv. Setbacks, building lines, and buffer yards xv. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of those persons or entities who own the property and those persons or entities filing the application xvi. Such additional information as the Administrative Official may reasonably require given the particular characteristics of the property. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously Case No. Attachment D ZA15-138 Page 7 received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the the entire site existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% -20% 70% 20.1 —40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. 3. A Tree Conservation Plan based on conformity of the Preliminary Plat is required to be submitted with a Final Plat. Ensure that the trees that are proposed to be preserved can actually be preserved throughout the development construction phase. There appears to be some trees shown to be preserved that are in an existing concrete slab area. If the percentage of tree canopy shown to be preserved on the Tree Conservation Analysis cannot be preserved on the Tree Conservation Plan,the City Council must approve the change to allow a lower percentage of tree canopy to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Exhibit 43- C requires a 25' Type "G" bufferyard along S. H. 114. An R- Case No. Attachment D ZA15-138 Page 7 PUD regulation has been added to allow a variable width bufferyard and to allow the existing trees and native grasses to be left in their natural state. The City required plantings for a Type "G" Bufferyard shall not be required with this RPUD. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Alex Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8274 E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Construction within SH 114 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit application prior to site plan approval. 3. Show proximity of gas well in site plan in Westlake. Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS: Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. Water and sewer lines in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment D ZA15-138 Page 7 1. Show drainage arrows on the existing drainage area maps. 2. Limits of 100- year floodplain shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage easement. 3. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to approval of construction plans. Since the majority of the runoff is entering the TxDOT system on SH 114; verify capacity to insure detention is not required for this phase. 4. Proposed culverts along right of way shall be sized by an engineer. Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed. Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre- construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction,and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on Case No. Attachment D ZA15-138 Page 7 the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: kclementsa-ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un- sprinkled homes. (Hydrants are over-spaced on Jamestown Lane) Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager 817-748-8607 pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of$3000 per dwelling unit x 9 dwelling units = $27,000.00 . Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian access to Trail System or sidewalk connection. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. General Informational Comments * All sidewalks within a private lot or open space area need to be placed in a pedestrian access easement. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. Case No. Attachment D ZA15-138 Page 7 All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA15-138 Page 7 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP AND RESPONSES Southlake Meadows Phase III SPO# Owner wa esr w b p eW ti w w x ; e 3 w, g A 3 IL F 5� Zoning LandUse Acreage •• 1. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3000 KIRKWOOD BLVD 78.39 NR 2. RPUD 4.29 NR 3. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2651 SAMS SCHOOL RD 2.52 NR 4. RPUD 3.20 NR 5. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2631 SAMS SCHOOL RD 0.92 NR 6. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2550 SAMS SCHOOL RD 0.67 NR 7. RPUD 1.00 NR 8. RPUD 0.84 NR 9. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2601 SAMS SCHOOL RD 0.45 NR 10. RPUD 0.27 NR 11. RPUD 0.18 NR 12. RPUD 0.42 NR 13. RPUD 0.57 NR 14. RPUD 0.24 NR 15. RPUD 0.90 NR 16. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 600 W DOVE RD 1.14 NR 17. RPUD 0.90 NR 18. RPUD 0.26 NR 19. RPUD 1.87 NR 20. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 800 W SH 114 2.00 NR 21. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 848 W SH 114 3.11 NR 22. RPUD 1.65 NR 23. RPUD 0.73 NR 24. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 800 W SH 114 0.99 NR 25. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 812 W SH 114 0.08 NR Case No. Attachment E ZA15-138 Pagel Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Case No. Attachment E ZA15-138 Page 2 Notices Sent: Twenty-five (25) Responses Received: None (0) Case No. Attachment E ZA15-138 Page 3