Item 6G CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
February 22, 2016
CASE NO: ZA15-137
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Southlake Meadows Phase III
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: G&A Consultants, LLC is requesting 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and
Development Plan for Southlake Meadows Phase III to develop nine(9)residential lots
and one (1) open space lot on approximately 8.88 acres on property described
as Tracts 7A1, 7A2. 7A1A, 7A1A1 and 7B, being portions of Lot 7, R. P. Estes
Subdivision and Tracts 1A and 1A1,James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, City
of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 800, 848 and 812 W. State Hwy.
114, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: None. Proposed Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential
Planned Unit Development District. SPIN Neighborhood #5.
REQUEST
DETAILS: The applicant is requesting 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development
Plan for Southlake Meadows, Phase III to "R-PUD " Resididential Planned Unit
Development District to develop nine (9) residential lots and one (1)open space lot on
approximately 8.88 acres. The property, which lies just to the north of the Southlake
Meadows subdivision that is under construction, was recently added to the City of
Southlake in a Boundary Adjustment Agreement with the Town of Westlake. There is
an existing gas well in Westlake that is approximately 310.2' from the property line of
the proposed development. The property does not have a Land Use Plan designation,
so a Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment to assign the Medium Density
Residential designation is also being requested under case number CP15-003. The
proposed gross density is approximately 1.01 dwelling units per acre and the proposed
net density is approximately 1.02 units per acre.
At the direction of City Council at 1St reading on January 19, 2016, the applicant
revised Lot 1 to create an additional buffer between the lot and W. State Hwy. 114 by
shifting the lots to the west. A revised landscape plan was provided. The open space
area and percentage increased as shown in the table below.
Site Data Summary
1/19 2/2 and 3/1
Number of Residential Lots 9 9
Number of Open Space Lots 1 1
Gross Acreage 8.88 8.88
Gross Density 1.01 du/acre 1.01 du/acre
Net Acreage 8.85 8.85
Net Density 1.02 du/acre 1.02 du/acre
Open Space Acreage 2.76 2.94
Open Space Percentage 31% 33%
Case No.
ZA15-137
The R-PUD district will follow the uses and regulations in the "SF-20A" Single Family
Residential District except as noted in the table below. A comparison of the revised R-
PUD regulations at the February 2, 2016 and March 1, 2016 meetings to the
regulations that were presented at the January 19, 2016 City Council meeting are
shown in the table below with the revisions highlighted in red.
Development Regulations (Compared to SF-20A Base Zoning)
Existing R-PUD for Proposed R-PUD Proposed R-PUD
SF-20A Southlake Meadows Phase III Phase III
(fka Savannah (1/19) (2/2 &3/1 )
Estates)
Front Yard 35' 25' 25' 25'
Setback
Side Yard 15' 151* 10' 15'
Setback
Rear Yard40' (25' for lots on a cul- 30' 40'
Setback (30' for Lot 1
de-sac) )
Maximum Lot 30% 50% 50% 30%
Coverage
Minimum Lot 20,000 sq. ft. 15,000 sq. ft. 20,000 sq. ft. 20,000 sq. ft.
Area
Lot Width 100' 100' at front building 100' at front building 100' at front
line line building line
Lot Depth 125' 100' 100' 100'
Maximum
Gross 2.18 du/acre 1.2 du/acre 1.02 du/acre 1.02 du/acre
Density
Maximum 35' and 2 '/2 35' and 2 '/2 stories** 35' and 2 '/2 stories 35' and 2 '/2 stories
Height stories
Minimum none 15% 15%
Open Space
* Conditions for second front yard on corner and key lots
** One-story for buildings or structures adjacent to roundabout at Peytonville Ave.
/Dove Rd. /Sam School Rd.
At the direction of City Council at the February 2, 2016 meeting, the applicant has
made the following revisions to the plan.
1. The caliper inches of the trees to be planted have been increased from 3" to
4".
2. An 8' multi-use trail that extends from Jamestown Ln. to Sam School Rd.
has been added.
Although the property is called Southlake Meadows, Phase III, the proposed "R-
PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District zoning is a stand alone zoning
district and it is not a part of the previously approved "R-PUD" zoning for Southlake
Meadows (formerly Savannah Estates) that was approved March 5, 2013. The
proposed "R-PUD" regulations are the same as the regulations in the previously
approved "R-PUD" district for Southlake Meadows (formerly Savannah Estates)
except as noted in the table above.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan
Case No.
ZA15-137
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) Development Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated February 22, 2016
(E) Surrounding Property Owner Responses
(F) Ordinance No. 480-709
(G) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817)748-8072
Richard Schell (817)748-8602
Case No.
ZA15-137
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Maguire Partners — Solana Ltd.
APPLICANT: G&A Consultants, LLC
PROPERTY LOCATION: 800, 848 and 812 W. State Hwy. 114
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION: Tracts 7A1, 7A2. 7A1A, 7A1A1 and 7B, being portions of Lot 7, R. P. Estes
Subdivision and Tracts 1A and 1A1,James B. Martin Survey,Abstract No. 1134
LAND USE CATEGORY: There is not currently a 2030 Land Use Designation on the property.
CURRENT ZONING: There is no zoning on the property.
HISTORY: A plat for RP Estes Subdivision was filed with Tarrant County in 1947 prior to
the property being added to the City.
The property was added to the City of Southlake in 2015 in a Boundary
Adjustment Agreement with the Town of Westlake and given the "AG"
Agricultural District zoning designation.
The following in a history of Phases I and II of Southlake Meadows to the
south:
A Land Use Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential and Mixed Use to
Medium Density Residential for Savannah Estates (later changed to Phases I
and 11 of Southlaike Meadows) was approved by City Council March 5, 2013.
A Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA12-088) for Savannah Estates
(later changed to Southlake Meadows) from "NR-PUD" Non Residential
Planned Unit Development, "AG"Agricultural District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site
Plan District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District was
approved by City Council on March 5, 2013.
A Preliminary Plat (ZA13-037) for Savannah Estates (later changed to
Southlake Meadows) was approved June 4, 2013.
A Plat Revision (ZA13-074) for Southlake MeadowsPhase I was approved
November 21, 2013.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The site does not currently have a 2030 Land Use designation since it was
recently added to the City in a Boundary Adjustment Agreement with the
Town of Westlake.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Sam School Rd.to be a two
lane undivided collector with 70' of right of way. Adequate right of way is shown
to be dedicated on the plans.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-137 Pagel
The Pathways Master Plan shows an 8' multi-use trail along SH 114. The
Development Plan shows an 8' trail through the eastern open space lot
connecting Jamestown Ln. to the 8' multi-use trail in the open space lot
adjacent to S.H. 114 that was approved with the original R-PUD zoning. That
trail extends south to W. Dove. Rd. At the direction of City Council at the
February 16, 2016 meeting, the applicant has added an 8' multi-use trail that
extends from Jamestown Ln. to Sam School Rd. through the western open
space lot.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The development shows one street access onto Sam School Rd., which is
currently under construction as a two lane undivided collector with 70' of right
of way. The traffic counts for this roadway are below.
SchoolSam
(between W. D. ...
24hr North Bound (747) South Bound (697)
AM Peak AM (154)8:00—9:00 AM Peak AM (38) 11:45 AM— 12:45 PM
PM Peak PM (76)5:00—6:00 PM Peak PM (92)5:45—6:45 PM
*Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Trak Count Report
Traffic Impact
Use Lots ..
OUT OUT
Single Family Residential(210) 9 86 11 2 5 6 3
* Vehicle Trips Per Day
*AM-In,AM-Out,PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour of generator on a weekday
*Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition
WATER & SEWER: The property will be served by an existing water line in Sam School Rd.
Sanitary sewer for the development is proposed to connect to an existing 8"
sewer line that runs along Jamestown Ln. in Southlake Meadows Phase II.
TREE PRESERVATION: The Tree Preservation Plan shows that 50% of the existing canopy would be
required to be preserved if this was a straight zoning case and 40.1% of the
canopy is shown to be preserved.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for the original Savannah Estates (later changed to Southlake
Meadows) was held by the applicant on October 8, 2012.
The applicant hosted a community meeting for the original Savannah Estates
(later changed to Southlake Meadows)for concerned citizens on November 1,
2012 at Town Hall.
The applicant hosted a community meeting for the original Savannah Estates
(later changed to Southlake Meadows) for concerned citizens on January 3,
2013 at Town Hall.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-137 Page 2
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: January 7, 2016; Approved (5-1) subject to the Revised Development Plan
Review Summary No. 2, dated January 7, 2016 and also subject to the staff
report dated January 7, 2016.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: January 19, 2016; Approved at 1St reading (6-0) subject to the staff report
dated January 12, 2016 and Development Plan Review Summary No. 3,dated
January 11, 2016 noting the following: we are accepting the R-PUD regulations
as provided and located in the staff report as Attachment C page 1, maximum
number of residential lots permitted is nine, acceptance of the tree
preservation as presented, noting that the trail system shown will be installed
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of the first residential home,
and noting that the applicant has agreed to provide alternative options for how
the nine lots are positioned, noting Council's opposition to the current
configuration for Lot 1, and the applicant is also agreeing in the revised options
to provide a detailed landscape plan as it relates to the buffer on 114.
February 2, 2016; A motion to table the item to the March 1, 2016 meeting was
approved (5-0).
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated February 22,
2016.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-137 Page 3
Vicinity Map
500, 812, 848 W. State Hwy. 114
9
C
3
'3
v�
t
3
�'`' •. ZA 1 5-1 37
Zoning Change and
Development Plan
Southlake Meadows Phase III
0 650 1300 2,600
Feet
s
s
Case No. Attachment B
ZA15-137 Page 1
PROPOSED R-PUD REGULATIONS
4th DRAFT
01.25.2016
Development Standards
Residential Planned Unit Development District
Southlake Meadows Phase III
+/-8.882 Acres
I. PURPOSE AND INTENT
The purpose and intent of this Residential Planned Unit Development District (RPUD) is to provide
for medium density single family uses and open space uses by incorporating specific development
standards.
II. PERMITTED USES
The following uses shall be permitted uses in the RPUD District for Southlake Meadows Phase III:
a. All uses permitted under Section 14.2 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance, "SF-20A Single
Family Residential District".
III. ACCESSORY USES
All accessory uses listed under Section 34 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance for the SF-20A
Zoning District shall be authorized as accessory uses in RPUD District.
a. Accessory buildings shall match the architectural style used for the primary structure.
IV. SPECIFIC USE PERMITS
Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the
Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of the City of Southlake
Zoning Ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in
Section 45, together with any conditions the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an
approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the
conditions for an accessory use as defined the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance.
V. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
In this RPUD District,the following development regulations shall be applicable:
a. Height:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-137 Page 1
1. No building or structure shall exceed two and one-half stories, nor shall it exceed thirty-five
(35)feet.
2. Height will be measured from the finished lot grade to the midpoint of the highest main
pitched or hipped roof above.
b. Front Yard: There shall be a minimum front yard setback of twenty five (25) feet.
c. Side Yard:There shall be a minimum side yard setback of fifteen (15)feet.
d. Rear Yard: There shall be a minimum rear yard setback of forty (40) feet, except for Lot 1, as
shown on the Development Plan, shall have a minimum rear yard setback of thirty (30)feet.
e. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not to
exceed thirty percent (30%) of the lot area.
f. Lot Area: The minimum lot area shall be twenty-thousand (20,000) square feet.
g. Lot Dimensions: Each residential lot shall have a minimum width of one hundred (100) feet to
be measured at the front yard setback line. The minimum depth of a residential lot shall be one
hundred (100)feet.
h. Floor Area: For a single story home, the main residence shall contain a minimum of three
thousand (3,000) square feet of floor area. For a two-story home, the main residence shall
contain a minimum of three thousand and five hundred (3,500) square feet.
i. Maximum Residential Density: The maximum number of dwelling units per acre shall not
exceed 1.02.
VI. OPEN SPACE,TRAIL, SCREENING AND BUFFERYARD REQUIREMENTS
a. Common Open Space Areas:
1. The minimum amount of common open space area within the development shall not be less
than twenty-five percent(25%) of the gross site area.
2. Common open space areas shall consist of those areas used as landscape buffers, open
space lots, amenity lots, pedestrian access, greenbelts, FEMA floodplain, and/or drainage
areas.
3. Common open space areas shall be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association.
b. Public Trails:
1. An eight-foot (8') public multi-use trail shall be provided along SH 114 within the open space
lot.
c. Screening:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-137 Page 2
I. Walls or any fences visible from the street or open space from the rear shall be wrought iron
and that approved board on board cedar in between the houses will be permitted.
2. The wrought iron fence that runs parallel to S.H. 114 shall not be required to be articulated,
and shall be constructed as shown on the fencing plan.
d. Bufferyards:
1. The open space lot along SH 114 shall be a variable width buff eryard. The existing trees and
native grasses shall be left in their natural state and the City required plantings for a Type G
Bufferyard shall not be required with this RPUD.
VII, ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS:
a. Roof:
1. Moderate to steep roofs are encouraged, 6:12 pitched roofing for Mediterranean style
houses is allowed, The roof must show matching pitches at all visible hips.
2. Metal roofing is allowed in small areas as a detail element and should typically be made of
copper or metal standing seam. Dimensional or High Definition approved materials will
include a 35 year warranty composition concrete clay barrel or slate roofing or comparable
products as approved by administrator shall be allowed.
b. Exterior Walls and Finishes:
1. Acceptable Materials:
A. Brick
B. Stone
C. Cast Stone
D. Stucco-Concrete Only
E. Wood
F. Hardiplank for soffit and fascia trim only
2. Unacceptable Materials:
A. E.F.1.S.
3. Front Elevations:
A. If there is a blend of natural stone and brick, there will be a minimum of six hundred
(600) square feet of stone.
B. If the front elevation is all brick, there may be cast stone surrounds on the windows and
the entry porch. Brick sliced corbels and accent pieces are encouraged.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-137 Page 3
c. Doors&Windows:
1. Acceptable Windows:
A. All windows must be wood or wood-clad or vinyl or vinyl clad.
B. All windows on the front of the residence must have exterior muntins made of either
wood or vinyl. All other windows do not require exterior muntins.
2. Doors:
A. All doors shall be recessed and not "flush"to show wall depth.
B. Front Doors shall be a minimum of three (3) feet wide by eight(8)feet tall and be made
of wrought iron or paneled hardwood.
d. Garage Doors:
1. All homes must have a three (3) car garage.
2. All garage doors shall be sectional wood or wood-clad.
3. Garage doors shall be recessed a minimum of six (6) inches to create more wall depth and
lessen the focus on the garage door.
4. Garage doors shall be placed at right angles.
5. No garage doors will face the streets.
e. Driveways, Sidewalks, and Parking
1. All driveways, sidewalks, and parking areas shall be made of concrete, stone, or pavestone
and shall be exposed aggregate, salt seeded finish, patterned or stained textured.
f. Landscaping:
2. Each lot shall contain no less than three (3), four (4) inch to five (5) inch minimum caliper
trees. This can be accomplished through the use of existing or new trees.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-137 Page 4
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SOUTHLAKE MEADOWS PH I & II
Phase III - \
L_d.JJ .d.. r-� r -�r-J r-�Rl
�I_ --_i r• -1 la.
I I,J,I I 4.1 I d,l ,I I d, I.d.lLJ L—J L—JJ L,I L_ -IL -J�:rJar-J ,r_
1 I I� 1�--,�r--ice -I
I'I J.I'I d,I'I v,l'Ia- Iv.'I
J I'I.i.
i �1 r-r r-r r-
'il i.l JII I I it„II II II I ' \r ,
I I I I I I I I I I I I'i'I I•i•I I'i•I I ♦ \
-J L_J L_J L_J L_J L •� `� \ \` a��'�\\\�,.
.•-• 'I•d Y lil ISI ISI I'I I'I it I;I I;I ,\\ \ \\ 1, \
.i JI d, IJ,I IJ,I I,i,l Ia.I IJ.I IJ,I I.i.l IJ,I IJ,I \ J ) ,
L_J L_J
r--r f` I I I
1� _ J. I I ^i' I I I I I I I I 't• I I J 1 1 1 l I ��'� � \\
L
L---
— l IL a. i
sf 7/ C•a, � T� pl E A V1
Approved March 5, 2013
- ���^^til��, I II a,� '�li _._„ els r---, I���•';nv All v���'v�
��. �1 _•I�� _ter,—� ';r--� �1 r''11 I � .a
\
J, d,
U
L
\ I
•I
i
i
i
- � I J L J
Dove Rojo
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-137 Page 5
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 1ST READING 1/19/2016
LINE TADLE
.wsn. Jam.,st..nn Lane I I I® o'�� O
' na wr eeovasEoe Teal • •— ••••�••�••,•,•�••••••••••
sao-a s'e.0 ia' g�xe
I x.mu� n-euo
a.,wA
:Ir b rr 111 F Proaosea Fri;T-VUD 1 r-=-5017, ----� ----1 n
/i
Proposed d LVD:Medium I I
S I Density lR�Idential
i' currentlz ding:AG \�
current wb Lbw As
/ Rei itiel
-
gl
=I tsal I I ISI ISI ISI ISI ISI ISI ISI ��
I I I I I I I I i I I I
QI I I I I I
s I I I I I
__J I
Zoni g:R-PUD
LUD:MediumLDensity
Res
denial
ZA15-137��
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 2 ND READING 2/16/2016
LINE TABLE I
O ,sns Aw Ama aI�<
... L------_L
ti--lora--iQ— JBmeetom L&IB --��_ xfl
• —w,,�r„x-�� rRroposed.7o BYUD—, r_—�psm=T�•
a Proposed(Up:IMedium
Density lR si4lential I`
currentlz nitle:AG
currenCL D:INone I I
a o
--� I ISI ISI ISI ISI ISI ISI I ; I � �
I I L - I I I I I I I I I I
- --J
_
meso mane
n Zoning:R-PUD
1 L ' LUD:Me IumLDensity
T ResyldenJial
1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-137 Page 6
REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3/1/2016
SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART
_ ••"_ � � Existing Zoning Agricultural
Proposed Zoning R—PUD
Existing Land Use None
�•�_.. = —�— __--,r--fi Proposed Land Use Medium Density Residential
• O Mi .." •R �� v, 'I 1, Acreage
Gross 8.86 A
-- � Proposed ROW Ded. 0.03 A (Sam School Road)
Net 8.85 A
Residential Lot Coverage 30% Maximum
Area Percentage
8' trail connects sidewalk on Jamestown Ln. to Sam School Rd. Open Space 2.94 A 33.2%
Building Footprint Area 3,000 SF Minimum (1-Story)
i —•- -- _ -- 4,000 SF Minimum (2-Story)
Proposed Lots
Residential 9
f—v.--� i Propowd
1 � I Pr oposedlW:IMMium i 1 HOA "X" Lots 2
i Den:yR:uen<Ia1 Total Lots 11
1 1 .. o-"`
I h I I i 1 a�Kmc 1
i Residential Density 1.013 du/ac
I(/
I r� r' i i' r• 9 i r• •+• i -+. ,a, is •., ni I!i \ •c'• Area Percentage
Residential 5.91 A 66.8%
1 i : l 11i 111 III Ii i11 1 : i 11
I
I -
1 .
__--J Lc_m•_J L__—_J J J �J.JrLMLJ L __
`_�— __— nl. YN• Zoniiy:R-PUD ;s+o -—_ I ___ 1 \I
IZA1 1St
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-137 Page 7
REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN
�, l i l I I I I I :%-•�
III:
—' --- 7-
L --J L—-j i_--L LL--J L--J L L•-- I
PLANT LEGEND
-7 r
`" ,.,._m,• Caliper inches increased from 3" to 4"
10)
PLANT LIST
QUANT. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL. NAME Ucol.
IN. HT, SPACE REMARKS
F V R 6 BUR OAK Quercus macrocarpa 0'-12' per plan Single trunk
a� 14 TEXAS RED OAK Quercus texensis 0'-12' per plan Single trunk
9 LIVE OAK Quercus virginiona 0'-12' per pion Single trunk
20 ARIZONA CYPRESS Cupressus arizonica 0'-12' per plan Single trunk
20 EASTERN RED CEDAR Junlperus virginiana 0'-12' per plan Single trunk
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-137 Page 8
REVISED TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 3/1/2016
!//\\ !i////�/i ;111�111��I I I f� i i 114 -__-_ r ___ �```��•
rrr rirr r rf
LEGEND TOTAL SITE................................................386,890 SF
TOTAL TREE COVERAGE.............................187,555 SF
EXISTING TOTAL PERCENTAGE TREE COVERAGE.......48.5%
TREE CANOPY
PRESERVED TOTAL TREE COVERAGE.........................................187,555 SF
® PRESERVED TREE COVERAGE...................................75,209 SF or 40.1%
MARGINAL MARGINAL PRESERVED TREE COVERAGE...................25,118 SF or 13.4%
TREE COVERAGE FOR REMOVAL..............................87,228 SF or 46.5%
rrrrREMOVED TREE CANOPY SAVED...............................................40.1%
SLOPES OVER 5%
**NOTE**
NO ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS IDENTIFIED ON SITE
—NO AREAS IDENTIFIED FOR PRESERVATION IN THE CITY'S ERP MAP
—NO EXISTING WATER BODIES IDENTIFIED ON SITE
—ANY MITIGATION TREES WILL BE PLANTED IN LINEAR PARK
IN AREAS WHERE THERE ARE NO EXISTING TREES
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-137 Page 9
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA15-137 Review No.: Five Date of Review: 02/22/16
Project Name: Development Plan — Southlake Meadows Phase III
APPLICANT: Randi L. Rivera, AICP OWNER: Jack Dawson
G&A Consultants, LLC Maguire Partners — Solana Land, LP
111 Hillside Drive 1800 Valley View Lane, Ste 300
Lewisville, Texas 75057 Farmers Branch, Texas 75234
Phone: (972) 436-9712 (469) 892-7200
E-mail: randi@gacon.com Jack@centurionamerican.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
02/18/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential must be approved by City
Council before the zoning change request from "AG" Agricultural District to "R-PUD" Residential
Planned Unit Development can be approved.
2. A Preliminary Plat that conforms to the R-PUD district zoning must be processed and approved
and then a Plat Revision processed and recorded prior to the conveyance of any lots or the
issuance of any building permits.
3. Please be aware that all plans and exhibits submitted with an application for an R-PUD Residential
Planned Unit Development District zoning are approved as part of the R-PUD zoning ordinance
and that changes to the plans after Council approval will require re-approval of an R-PUD Zoning
Change and Development Plan.
4. The Pathways Master Plan shows an 8' multi-use trail along SH 114. The Development Plan shows an
8' trail through the eastern open space lot connecting Jamestown Ln. to the 8' multi-use trail in the
open space lot adjacent to S.H. 114 that was approved with the original R-PUD zoning. That trail
extends south to W. Dove. Rd. At the direction of City Council at the February 16, 2016 meeting, the
applicant has added an 8' multi-use trail that extends from Jamestown Ln. to Sam School Rd.through
the western open space lot.
5. The trail in the open space lot must be placed in a Pedestrian Access Easement. A note has been
added to the Preliminary Plat to designate the open space lot as a Pedestrian Access Easement. A 4'
sidewalk is required along Sam School Rd. and Jamestown Lane. The required 4' sidewalks are
shown on the Pedestrian
6. Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.f requires all fencing that runs roughly parallel to S. H.
114 to be constructed of the primary masonry materials of the building, wrought iron or living plant
materials. It shall not run in a straight line without being offset by a minimum of 6 feet every 60
feet. An R-PUD regulation has been added stating that the wrought iron that runs parallel to SH
114 is allowed as shown on the fence plan with no articulation.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-137 Page 1
7. If necessary, please add language regarding a gas pipeline to the Final Plat as required by the
Gas Well Ordinance.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. A Tree Conservation Analysis was submitted with both the Development Plan and Preliminary Plat
submittals. Since a Preliminary Plat was submitted in conjunction with the Development Plan, a Tree
Conservation Plan is not required to be submitted. The plan shows that 50% of the existing canopy
would be required to be preserved if this was a straight zoning case and 40.1% is shown to be
preserved (see the comment below regarding tree cover requirements in R-PUD zoning districts.
Please be aware that the percentage of canopy to be preserved shown on the plan must be shown to
be preserved on the Tree Preservation Plan that is required with the Plat Revision. If the percentage of
canopy to be preserved cannot be met at that time or at the time of construction, approval of a zoning
change or a variance to the Tree Preservation Ordinance will be required.
Information required for Tree Conservation Plan:
i. Identification of Critical Environmental Features of the site:
A. All individually protected trees
B. Existing streams, drainage creeks, ponds, and other water bodies (if any)
ii. Tree Survey or alternative to a tree survey
iii. 2-foot contour map of the site
iv. Protected trees within the tree preservation area including tree size and type
V. Critical Root Zones of groups of trees
vi. Critical Root Zones for individual trees required for site plans only
vii. Boundaries of any tree preservation areas as identified in the ERP Map
viii. Identification of areas of environmental constraints not suitable for development
ix. Identification of areas of minimal environmental constraints that are suitable for
development
X. Areas of encroachment into Critical Environmental Features identified on the site
A. Clear delineation, for each protected tree, of whether the tree will be preserved after the
proposed development is constructed, altered due to proposed improvements, or could
potentially be saved based upon site specific conditions
xii. Stream/Creek buffers, if any
xiii. Detailed site plan of all proposed improvements. (All proposed improvements shall be
required to be shown only at the site plan stage for all development. Preliminary plats
shall, however, show building setbacks and general location of buildings and
infrastructure.)
xiv. Setbacks, building lines, and buffer yards
xv. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of those persons or entities who own the
property and those persons or entities filing the application
xvi. Such additional information as the Administrative Official may reasonably require given
the particular characteristics of the property.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-137 Page 2
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously
received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the
first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be
preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% -20% 70%
20.1 —40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public
rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for
a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as
established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve
the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to
maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental
Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas
from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage
creek;
V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets
as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
3. A Tree Conservation Plan based on conformity of the Preliminary Plat is required to be submitted with
a Final Plat. Ensure that the trees that are proposed to be preserved can actually be preserved
throughout the development construction phase. There appears to be some trees shown to be
preserved that are in an existing concrete slab area. If the percentage of tree canopy shown to be
preserved on the Tree Conservation Analysis cannot be preserved on the Tree Conservation Plan,the
City Council must approve the change to allow a lower percentage of tree canopy to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Exhibit 43- C requires a 25' Type "G" bufferyard along S. H. 114. An R-
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-137 Page 3
PUD regulation has been added to allow a variable width bufferyard and to allow the existing trees and
native grasses to be left in their natural state. The City required plantings for a Type "G" Bufferyard
shall not be required with this RPUD.
Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Alex Ayala, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8274
E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. Construction within SH 114 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit application
prior to site plan approval.
3. Show proximity of gas well in site plan in Westlake.
Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found
in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
EASEMENTS:
Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15'
minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS:
Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way.
Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
Water and sewer lines in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Show drainage arrows on the existing drainage area maps.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-137 Page 4
2. Limits of 100- year floodplain shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage easement.
3. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to
approval of construction plans. Since the majority of the runoff is entering the TxDOT system on SH
114; verify capacity to insure detention is not required for this phase.
4. Proposed culverts along right of way shall be sized by an engineer.
Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards.
The proposed flume will not be allowed.
Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the
Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review.
The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and
general notes which are located on the City's website:
http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-
construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to
TxDOT for review.
New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must
include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially
reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution
(especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project
manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during
mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction,and one map
showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include
timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be
submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. Retaining
walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered
engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections
Department prior to construction.
A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-
8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system.
A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on
the City Council agenda for consideration.
Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-137 Page 5
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Assistant Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: kclementsa-ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un-
sprinkled homes. (Hydrants are over-spaced on Jamestown Lane)
Community Service/Parks Department Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
817-748-8607
pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee
payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further
details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park
land for every forty (40) dwelling units.
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the
amount of$3000 per dwelling unit x 9 dwelling units = $27,000.00 .
Pathway Comments:
Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian
access to Trail System or sidewalk connection. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all
public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision
Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements.
General Informational Comments
* All sidewalks within a private lot or open space area need to be placed in a pedestrian access
easement.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-137 Page 6
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-137 Page 7
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP AND RESPONSES
Southlake Meadows Phase III
LL
I I A F
SPO# Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response
1. MAGUIRE PARTNERS SOLONA LAND L RPUD 2411 SAMS SCHOOL RD 1.02 NR
2. STRANGE, KIM AG 2350 CRAWFORD CT 0.54 NR
3. GRAPEVINE HISTORIC HOMES LLC AG 2355 CRAWFORD CT 0.49 NR
4. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2511 SAMS SCHOOL RD 0.49 NR
5. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2531 SAMS SCHOOL RD 0.54 NR
6. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 0.47 NR
7. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC AG 0.06 NR
8. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 0.49 NR
9. CRAWFORD,JAMES ANDERSON AG 2320 CRAWFORD CT 1.00 NR
10. WISE, PHILIP W AG 982 W DOVE RD 1.04 NR
11. 940 WEST DOVE RD LLC SFI-A 940 W DOVE RD 4.86 0
12. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2417 SAMS SCHOOL RD 10.07 NR
13. JANDON LTD 11111ff AG 974 W DOVE RD 5.02 u
14. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2551 SAMS SCHOOL RD 3.08 NR
15. CRAWFORD, LOIS MAY AG 2390 CRAWFORD CT 1.03 NR
16. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 2407 SAMS SCHOOL RD 2.01 NR
17. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 2401 SAMS SCHOOL RD 2.24 NR
18. WEBSTER, PHILIP W AG 1052 W DOVE RD 1.17 NR
19. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2501 SAMS SCHOOL RD 5.85 NR
20. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3000 KIRKWOOD BLVD 78.39 NR
21. RPUD 4.29 NR
22. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2651 SAMS SCHOOL RD 2.52 NR
23. RPUD 3.20 NR
24. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2631 SAMS SCHOOL RD 0.92 NR
25. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2550 SAMS SCHOOL RD 0.67 NR
Case No. Attachment F
ZAl 5-137 Pagel
26. RPUD 1.00 NR
27. RPUD 0.84 NR
28. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2601 SAMS SCHOOL RD 0.45 NR
29. RPUD 0.27 NR
30. RPUD 0.18 NR
31. RPUD 0.42 NR
32. RPUD 0.57 NR
33. RPUD 0.24 NR
34. RPUD 0.90 NR
35. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 600 W DOVE RD 1.14 NR
36. RPUD 0.90 NR
37. RPUD 0.26 NR
38. RPUD 1.87 NR
39. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 800 W SH 114 2.00 NR
40. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 848 W SH 114 3.11 NR
41. RPUD 1.65 NR
42. RPUD 0.73 NR
43. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 800 W SH 114 0.99 NR
44. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 812 W SH 114 0.08 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 2
Notices Sent: Forty-four (44)
Responses Received: Two (2)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 3
Notification Response Form
ZA16-137
Meeting Date: January 7, 2016 at 6:30 PM
JANDON LTD
PO BOX 610
SAINT JO, TX 76265
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING'.
Being the owner(s) of the.property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature: n�d �.�. Date: o/--o
Additional Signature: Date:
Printed Name(s): ( voCJ
Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. therwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 4
NOtifioatiOn R¢ePonee Form
r
Direct questions and mail responses to: '
ZA95-937 City of Scuthlake
Meeting Date:January T,2616 at 6:34 PM Planting&Development Services.:'--'Notification.Response' -
1400 Main St;Ste 310,'
940 WE=ST DOVE RD LLC Southiake,TX 76092' .
624 AYE 79TH AVE Phone:(617)748-8521
PORTLAND.OR 9T213 Fax:' (817)748-8077
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL,FAX OR BAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s)of the property so noted above,are hereby ;
in favor of opposed undecided about
(circte or underline one)
the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
f
Signature: - Date: s
Additional Signature: Date: 1
Printed Name($): il .t _
Must be property owner(s)whose namefta
s)are pred at top. OlhermseomftdthePlannirlgDopmtment one form per rty
prope_
Phone Number(optional):.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 5
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-709
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS
7A1, 7A2. 7A1A, 7A1A1 AND 713, BEING PORTIONS OF LOT 7, R.
P. ESTES SUBDIVISION AND TRACTS 1A AND 1A1,JAMES B.
MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 8.88
ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT "A" TO "R-PUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED
DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED
HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER
PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT
THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property currently has no zoning under the City's
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 1
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;
noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights
on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of
signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street
parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces,
and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the
promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of
the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 2
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Tracts 7A1 , 7A2. 7A1A, 7A1A1 and 7B, being portions of Lot 7,
R. P. Estes Subdivision and Tracts 1A and 1A1 ,James B. Martin Survey,Abstract No.
1134, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 8.88 acres, and
more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" to "R-PUD" Residential Planned
Unit Development District as depicted on the approved Development Plan attached
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 3
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following conditions:
Motion at City Council 1St reading:
January 19, 2016; Approved at 1St reading (6-0) subject to the staff report dated January
12, 2016 and Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 11, 2016 noting
the following: we are accepting the R-PUD regulations as provided and located in the staff
report as Attachment C page 1, maximum number of residential lots permitted is nine,
acceptance of the tree preservation as presented, noting that the trail system shown will
be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of the first residential home,
and noting that the applicant has agreed to provide alternative options for how the nine lots
are positioned, noting Council's opposition to the current configuration for Lot 1, and the
applicant is also agreeing in the revised options to provide a detailed landscape plan as it
relates to the buffer on 114 .
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 4
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 5
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for
a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1St reading the 19th day of January, 2016.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2016.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 6
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being described as Tracts 7A1, 7A2. 7A1A, 7A1A1 and 7B, being portions of Lot 7, R. P. Estes
Subdivision and Tracts 1A and 1A1,James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, City
of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 8.88 acres, and more fully and
completely described below:
Reserved for metes and bounds description
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 8
EXHIBIT "B"
Reserved for approved Development Plan
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-137 Page 9