Item 6D CITY OF
SOUTHLAI<,-E
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
February 23, 2016
CASE NO: ZA15-143
PROJECT: Site Plan for Starbucks
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Starbucks, Sterling Design Associates, LLC is requesting approval
of a Site Plan for Starbucks on property described as Lot 4, Block 1, Southlake
Crossing Phase II, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
and located at 2155 W. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas. Current
Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District. SPIN Neighborhood # 10.
REQUEST
DETAILS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Site Plan for the construction of an
approximately 2,075 square foot Starbucks Cafe with drive thru and
approximately 670 square foot outdoor patio area with a seating capacity to
accommodate from 15-30 patrons.
The site was previously occupied by McDonald's. The McDonald's building was
built in 1995. In 1999 a site plan was approved to relocate landscape parking
islands, parking spaces and drive lanes. McDonald's was approximately 4,553
square feet (3,116 s.f. restaurant / 1,437 s.f. play place). The applicant is
proposing a site plan for Starbucks that brings impervious coverage, tree
preservation, parking, building materials and interior landscape into compliance
with today's standards.
The new Starbucks stores feature modern design standards and building
materials. Starbucks has also committed to obtaining LEED New Construction
(NC) certification for this location.
On February 18, 2016 the Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously
recommended approval subject to the staff report and site plan review
summary, specifically approving the requested variances; noting the applicant's
willingness to provide additional renderings with options to wrap the columns; to
come before City Council with dimensions and specifications on the mechanical
equipment; and, to provide additional renderings showing the color variations
and photos of other similar stores. The applicant has provided these items and
they have been included in Attachment `C', pages 9-14 of this report.
VARIANCE
REQUESTS: Corridor Overlay District
1. The proposed building is less than 6,000 square feet which by Corridor
Overlay Standards requires a pitched roof. The proposed architectural
design indicates a parapet roof.
2. Exposed structural support columns shall be constructed of, or clad in, the
same masonry material as the principal structure. The proposed outdoor
Case No.
ZA15-143
seating area includes exposed columns which are consistent with Starbucks
design standards and are not shown to be clad in masonry. The applicant
has stated that the columns are part of the walk-way cover system and are
a major element and part of the industrial design intent of the project.
Bufferyards
1. The applicant is requesting relief from bufferyard requirements on the east,
south and west boundaries. Because the property is a platted lot within the
entire development, bufferyards are required to be provided around the
perimeter of the property. Due to existing conditions, the applicant is
challenged with providing the required bufferyard area along the east, west
and southern boundaries.
Variance Approval Criteria has been included in Attachment `A', page 3 of this
report.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct a Public Hearing
2. Consider approval of a Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information — LINK TO PRESENTATION
(D) SPIN Summary Report
(E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 11, 2016
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(G) Full Sized Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Lorrie Fletcher (817) 748-8069
Case No.
ZA15-143
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Starbucks Coffee Company
APPLICANT: Sterling Design Associates, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: 2155 W. Southlake Boulevard
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 1, Southlake Crossing Phase II
LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: `C-3' General Commercial District
HISTORY: - December 1984— City Council approved a zoning change for 27
acres to be known as Southlake Crossing (Market Place) from
Agricultural to Heavy Commercial. (ZA84-058)
- September 1989 — City Council adopted a new zoning ordinance
(No. 480) and new zoning map and reclassified the zoning for
Southlake Crossing to C-3— General Commercial District.
- September 1993 — City Council approved a revised concept plan for
Southlake Crossing. (ZA93-066)
- January 1994 — The Planning & Zoning Commission approved a
final plat for Lot 4, Block 1, Southlake Crossing Phase II. (ZA93-125)
- February 1999 — City Council approved a site plan for McDonald's
restaurant with drive-thru. (ZA98-165)
- January 2000 — City Council approved a site plan for Lots 5 and 6,
Block 1. (ZA99-092)
- August 2011 — City Council approved a site plan for Dunkin Donuts
(previously Taco Bell) with drive-thru. (ZA11-031)
- August 2012 — City Council approved a site plan for Starbucks
(previously / currently Boston Market) with drive-thru. (ZA12-056)
- November 2012 — City Council approved a site plan for Bicycles Inc.
(ZA12-086)
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Future Land Use Plan
The site is designated Retail Commercial. The Retail Commercial
category is a lower- to medium-intensity commercial category providing
for neighborhood-type retail shopping facilities and general commercial
support activities. It is intended to provide limited local retail and/or office
uses which serve neighborhoods in close proximity. It is intended that all
uses in this category will be compatible with adjacent single family uses,
thereby maintaining the character and integrity of existing
neighborhoods.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-143 Page 1
This category is intended to encourage comprehensively planned
developments. In areas where the Retail Commercial designation is
adjacent to residentially zoned properties or areas with a residential
designation on the Land Use Plan, lower intensity activities such as
office or office-related uses should be planned adjacent to the
residential uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the
Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, and Office Commercial
categories.
Mobility& Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan shows West Southlake
Boulevard to be a 6-lane divided Arterial with varying ROW widths of
130' to 140'.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
There is an existing 8' sidewalk along both sides of West Southlake
Boulevard. The proposed site plan shows and extension from the
subject property to the existing public sidewalk.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed site plan does not have direct access to West Southlake
Boulevard. There is an existing access drive to the west of the lot that
will provide access.
W. Southlake Blvd.
(between Peytonville . Randol
24hr West Bound (22,797) East Bound (24,309)
AM Peak AM (1,321) 11:45 AM—12:45 PM Peak AM (2,716)7:15—8:15 AM
PM Peak PM (2,549)5:00—6:00 PM Peak PM (1,460)4:45—5:45 PM
*Based on the 2015 City ofSonthlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis Threshold Worksheet was submitted by the
applicant and the requirement for a TIA was waived by the Director of
Public Works.
Use Area ..
IN OUT OUT
Coffee/Donut shop with 2,075 s.f. 786 98 95 41 41
drive-thru (937)
* Vehicle Trips Per Day
*AM-In,AM-Out,PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
*Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Mannal
TREE PRESERVATION: There is approximately 3% of existing tree canopy on the site; an 18"
Red Oak, a 10" Red Oak and three 4" Crape Myrtles. The applicant is
proposing to preserve 90% of existing canopy by only removing one of
the 4" Crape Myrtles which is necessary due to proposed parking
configuration.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-143 Page 2
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN Forum meeting was held November 10, 2015. A copy of the
report is included as Attachment `D' of this report.
PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: February 18, 2016; Approved (5-0) subject to the staff report dated
February 12, 2016 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated
February 11, 2016, specifically approving the requested variances;
noting the applicant's willingness to provide additional renderings with
options to wrap the columns; to come before City Council with
dimensions and specifications on the mechanical equipment; and, to
provide additional renderings showing the color variations and photos of
other similar stores.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 11, 2016.
Variance Criteria:
Corridor Overlay District
To receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate one of the
following:
1. A variance will reduce the impact of the project on surrounding
residential properties; or
2. Compliance with this ordinance would impair the architectural design
or creativity of the project; or
3. A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with surrounding
developed properties; or
4. The proposed construction is an addition to an existing project that
does not meet the requirements of this ordinance.
Bufferyards
On all site plans and concept plans requiring review by the Planning and
Zoning Commission and approval by the City Council, variances to the
bufferyards may be granted by the City Council.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-143 Page 3
Vicinity Map
Starbucks
CD
CD
r a
I
c
kn J
� J
<<-
.517FJ .4 K3
C;I O
CO
2225
ZA 15-143
Site Plan
i
r
Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZA15-143 Page 1
Proposed Site Plan
- u.rr o.nuw,a i
80NRHUI�C,�Ol�7G
F9d86 D
CAMMET A, RME 2425 0
° 4*V* 4 AWW"1201
y xsme cee[-3,nor
f $ ohrw utl Me LAnd pM1k'T6Ua
14—uY � ntira2vw T*
1kL=-Y't tr
V
kl]{ �rlbCllrJWL
SCn q
® 71N6u8M
resLem
O /bWN Irm
} x''OA"'T 4_r. LOT 5. DL
m O ' ,�{ 7wYsl 4FiHL�4lI� C
LIa,iu yea PEMM
LJ
sc ,ee a 't MT k SL kSL
ELM
,,..
i"JY"141L YQ
LYS Y! l '� 1J1
yl Y �w.ze39u�e ��
y�}4� Irr b� � • , e
I ay t
iuoqu!-� FYI!
nuenxo ❑ w{ � � � ZtWlO�r ee
n rww�uK 1P '. I *VLND
TUU�q
a te-EPAMpl ❑r #i1lowl
I I
F � bitr � ufYey err
r.!!n
LL _ r/!ln}! r�llliLte G,dRY � �iA
LArld9Jl'e rr
T SSL LIIl� �I
/1olr& 14 -F.t
E d1 YI1Ffl �P gg.+'
Ir• � � ertAe
x Ihoure" Ih1tr I Itmtr
z uWus�re • � h �� r�
el.§Yl1G LJ �
r—
LAYL9CJ!!}.51 Lb �� L8
rx�,l�g
ul�raraw ry cLweYr�t ewe
M11lrYlrrl7oSIlld LeFIT
YY BklaxalL _nnus-ut [:ree�,ioro. qhkj we4v�
rN. tle..r sL-xr�x a,x
un rr_rerx iGM:Mhie Ij
eurrexraxu 61WL �A11dWYii w
N alm um 1111M.-Imr.
sr. 7 C 99
e
41.r C Ay 16l
r. T-
a5{TYp�
SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART
CURRENT ZONING: G3 GENERAL COMMERGLAL DISTRICT
LAND USE DESIGNATION: RETAIL COMMERCIAL
PROPOSED USE: COFFEE SHOP WITH DRIVE-THRU CAFE
LOT AREA: 44.751 S.F-(1-827 ACRES}
TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 2.U75 SF.(4%Y
(SITE COVERAGE)
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 1,9211&F-
OPEN SPACE AREA: 19.166 S.F. 29%6
IMPERVIOLIS COVERAGE: 33.5115S.F.(75%)
PARKING REQUIRED: 24 SPACES 1 PER 3 SEATS
PARKING PROVIDED- 311 SPACES INCLUDING 2 HC SPACES
S=PROVIDED: a SPACES
S=
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 1
4 .t
Proposed Landscape Plan
7-CM -0 R=11A1M
cc [i F FE T/PAR➢}
NTENAF� "�'! � INi'_41CR i4 MF
LS 2-L 1A 7-MG
1 1-_11 1&TS
1 WERJOR
&BC L ^ LS ISLR40S
TOUT
L7 L0
E7n3'i14G HE � , 136-SG
TY}REKd^1N w -
5',1-C:E EX H
TFF=kW-
(FTYPE
UU6ILL71hC ILDIK abRF 6l.FFEAYFRO}
F 0 S
•21-W
50
NDSCPPE _ EDL HE
:4"fHACIC 'I E-11F
TD REMAIN -.
1S EUFR3iYA"
11'rFE111OR
LAhDSCAPE
SJRRGU4
fiUl IMG - 1Allhl.4
5-PLi
ik �4Fl Ff`TFTS tl
ATSI6'- "' 3YO1N1ET� R S
SUFFERSYA40 47-W, i x
NiHiIOR ,-W L
r� EDCfFi Nll. - 1-L0•
AL .40ftkk
16-FIW
1 5'TYPE'A'
S Bij �? FIUFFERYAR0
r 1.331[3'°Tw Acn-RL-195.84'
PLANT LIST
QUAN SYM. COMMOWBOTANICAL NAME 312E REMARKS
CANOPY TREES
2 CE CEDAR ELM W CAL FLA_L CROW STAII
Unmuasslrolla STD. SPEC.GLVJJTY
13 LO LIVE OAK W CIL FLA_L CRO W STAF)
CAIP1CIle ulglnUna 3TL7. SPEC.GALNJrr
ACCENT TREES
11 CM CRAPE MYRTLE am FLA_L CROWNL STAM)
Ld934091Ya I11oca WL=9% U-6"T. SPEC.CUAUrY
e CH CHMALPA 3o-GAL FLAJ_CR0WKML T17RUNI4
crll9paX13OKPmensr. &H 1®
T.(35CNES) STA ,SPE1 0-LALITY
SHRUGS
23 OL3 DWARF SJR=ORD HOLLY R# SPACING 31T0.C-
IIPX CMLU EUfiftlll 4ana 72'-1 E'.HT. FULL FORKI
ll] NA HEK4EYLY D"800 93 SPACING42-0.(—
NantlhaticirrKJ® 12'18'FTL FULL FORM
24 TS TEXAS SAGE 25 SPACING 3T0.C-
Levx»"kiM i,&SWE, 24 W HT. FLAT FORKI
GROUNI)COVER,PERENNIALS ANI)GRASSES
w LM LAINTANA M SPACING 3T0.C-
armnarD30widP,sls ESTABLISHED FLAT FORKI
254 MF UEXCAN FEATHER GWS5 I1 SPACING 24'Q.C-
4aeaelalerUSAIFa E STA13LISH3D FLAT FCRM
34 PM DINK ML HLY G4AS5 91 SPACING4?'O.C,
Uurlerbergla raplraM ESTABLISHED FLAJ_FORM
293 9G SL9ITCH GRASS 91 SPACING 36'0.0
-aricurn'dlgaILM 12'-IE lfF. SPEC.QUAUrr
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 2
Tree Preservation Plan
e I rs3.�r-r.
fff I� I � �nl•xw1•c r•RI � .
I I ILrusy Ke_t:•ic ��
cxu_urLv-r ouuucur:l-l:xa
f:]MGl4h 113 5t}
IIuleLwu4 _ •
I { LHT
} � �,I I I {c4w•r rlrrel_e *' � T��
I! uc-n�c:Murrw
0 ,� 17abd/h I �,• F
x I i pig
r I woo-
%44
G I - I } oer5n trSrdTrSl x
I I _ I � iDrllrlr4ac arl �
y rM1 I M 1
IS131:14 4"U" I 3
Umv i'.o4LY-IM s
j r8wyr}til®'Jri + R FS
_ �r x•m w•W IMEL140 rr
I M itil LAL-795rX
TREE COVER PRESERVATION CHART
PERCENT OF PERCENT OF COVER REQUIRED PERCENT PROPOSED PERCENT To BE REMOVED
EXISTING COVER TO BE PRESERVED TO BE PRESERVED
3%(11.397 S.F.) 710%(1378 S.F_) i]C%(±I=S.F.) 1494(f 145 S.F.)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 3
Proposed Elevations
wl
oea
........................
-1 H F
NORTH ELEVATION
lb
6 a1
Ll
_suvraF"VATI
EXTERIOR FINISH KEY
DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER I'l HIS V TEXTURE COLOR REMARKS
F-
G-Lil GLAZING
SOLARBAN 00 SOLAR -CLEAR CONTROL LOW
_E GLASS NA CLEAR
F-__ ALUMINUM
SF-1 I STOREFRONT KAWNER ANODIZED DARK BRONZE TRIFAB VG 451
METAL,COPING PAC-CLAD ANODIZED DARK BRONZE MATCH STOREFRn-NT
FINISH
F
BLENDED PATTERN BLEND BV1 BRICK ACME HORIZONTAL ULDTOWNE DARK BROWN MORTAR
FTR-21 BRICK ACME NIA DARK TOMEDARK BROWN MORTAR
'ELDERWGOa.
F-p7 PAINT NIA DARK BRONZE
SHERWIN FAINT TO MATCH
WILLIAMS I STOREFRONT
FFFF17 PORCELAIN-I- D-1- .-SON WOOD SW-AUTON
WOOD I
ARTWORK NA NIA NYAOPOSED LOCATION
FOR FUTURE ARTWORK
Case No. Attachment C
ZA1 5-143 Page 4
'll•I
,IW
a r+nzx - ro c+r
a L"L I
b -
ora:
JIM
T••' b
b
tr �
1&2
LJ
i
i
i
i
i
I
i RL
i
2 0
a
f
I •
H I-,
f-1 YI 21-14'
3?-41W
LEAST ELEVATION
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 5
--r Yi-i aL1i1M' as'.r
40 ET
.= wr�
rr_aAr_+Frr
-1 4
TF3 PF.4iF R T1]RFF_+F Cf
Fl-
El
�i
■IF3 +
�b7
�i
L
�3
4YSFiIY P[F=Q�Th]l�
S
1 A W
:f4 i.L-
'-S 2r•i-ICY' �•S'.'F
3'
3-r
,-`--,'A'EST ELEVAT ON
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 6
Proposed Outdoor Patio Area
wio-Gmswr
PROPOSED •
Case No. Attachment C
ZAl 5-143 Page 7
Applicant's Narrative Regarding Pitched Roof
Sterling Design Associates, Ilt
CM L ENGINEERS-LANbSC M FR041` ['s
Comment Response Letter
Date- 02.11.16
To= Lorrre, Planner I
arty of Southlake,TX
From, Jon Spencer, Sterling Design Associates,Agent for Applicant
RE- ZAIS-143 Comrrment Response from Site Plan Review No. I-
Propo-sed Starbucks Cafe at 2155 W. Southlake Blvd.
A varia nce to South la ke ci t?` cod a secriari 43. 12 rcqu iring a pitched roof for structures less tha n
6000 sq ua re feet is bei M requested for she proposed Starhuc ks I oca cion a t 2155 W Sou thlake
Blvd- Ad hering to the req uested compl iance with this ordi nanre woul d i mpa i r the a rchitectura I
d esign or creativity of the pfopece by not al laving for Starbucks brand standards for design 10 be
met at this Iocadon_
blew Starbucks s«res are designed with flat roofs to accommodate the use of open ceilings
inside of the store. This design evokes a mod ern. tastefully i nd ustri al aesthetic for patrorfs while
al lowing for an a iry, open can{ep a feel to rhe spa ce_ Ori the exteri or, the use of a H at roof
al lows for the cl ea n, modem b ui Id ing I ines Starb ucks has become known for on thei r sta nda Ione
stores_ In adhering eo South lake city code seceiari 43.12, Starbucks would he required to either
u ri Iize acoustical ceiling tiles and grid rc create drop ceiling or retain ehe open ceiling design
w'th in the Pitched root_ By utilizing a drop ceiling, Starbucks would be forced to sacrifice their
commonly known high ceiling, open concept design.
If Starbucks alternative Ip rets i ned the open caricept design wwh ile adh eri ng to the reques tcd
Pitched roof, the unusable additional interior ceiling space would cause an increase in rhe
heating and cooling load- Though manageable with the proposed mechanical equipment, the
increase would go aga i ns r the gcsal of LEER New Construcei-Gn (NC) cereification for this
location. Starbucks has commi tied to ob Iain ing LEER N C s M tius for al new stores i n rh e U n ite d
States.
It is understood per the code, that the pri ncipal exterior concern is the visi bit i ry of mechan iaal
u ni is and orhe r roof tap eq ui pment. As shown in the provi ded rend erings, the proposed
elevations allow far appropriate screening of all roof top equipment while maintaining Starbucks
design standards-
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 8
Post • StructureColumns
Option
�j
STARBUCKSCOFFEE � '
• .tion 2 — full height brick
- STARBUCKSCOFFEE
Option partial heightbric
sTARBUCKS COFFE
ti
Case
•
. Attachment C
ZAl 5-143 • -
Post P&Z — Mechanical Equipment
FigureCooing and gas/el ectricmodals-3toE�tati6 Figure 11. Gesfelectricrnradels-3to5tansstandard
standard efficiency,3 tons hig h efficiency, efficiency,3 tons high efficiency height of gas
snriig diemetsr for hinged daar[s]aptian Pipe required froni inside ba se of unit to gas rrhut
off assembly factory provided)-Y_C models
only
raata: nIIc1Tonslc o-ae1r1r: esn1111netcrs. Noto: A dlrnenrionsare 1nlnches�T Tc-c-s
I 017 MM)
I I
iH1uy Wong ,'�',.`ri�r nir
nrsw�
Figure 12. Cooling and gsslelecvic-8,7Vi(single)tons standard efficielrcy,4to 6tons hI efficiency
NOU: •IIcITnns1c-sn-clrlr=-cs:ndllnctcrs.
[8rl�x�+x tul
rwtaI6LC1i[C+ia� � —
,h K
�0F�1•I
•1Y
I ILFF
laTGhrli CflLLini-04akFY�1
61d Gx�La t�
�Ikr Vl�r{PT70_I�IE
e nm u,.&A
p"OOf Ak4 4YiGr.pt"-01"I
m dM 4.1 ,NFl�b6L4tQi
oykIW! W.rbl.nrtr
V
!M 114 n4M7 Lli RM
rN
,W Wt
lg loi a r m,"unoh "AW
RI,91413P•K L
l4LFrGrboGYsanom
1190-kA 2M-w rs+f1
e8rlxu axe edllrx�f•
A{LLGf ru¢_
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 10
Figure 15. Gaoling and gasfelectnc-6,W2 [single)tons standard efficiency. Oto 5tons high efficiency
unit clearance and roof opening
Nato: AMdirmnslons ere In inchesfmdlmmwe
CLEARANCE
CLEARANCE 36'(914 Mh* HORIEONTAL FLOW-1F 057 MW
{� 4pOWNFLO'N 36'(914 MM)
TYPICA-ROOFOPENING
CLEARMCE FROM
TOR OF UNIT 72"
41
ms
U5.1 1�1asr�la} {„ } x
041 AIME
x x 53 114
113U MM)
CLEARANCE hS' (12 10 Mh+} �� CLEARANCE 39`(9114 MM}
Figure 16. Gaoling and gaslolectnc-6,W2 (single)tons standard efficiency,4 to 5 tons high officienc,f-roof curb
Nato: A,dlmenslont Af*In Y5Ch�1rYiIWM�kiri.
{ <
4°91#
46 V
pR
WH) to iea
1' {ala Nw} 't-
US vi a?gg e�ww. ! _
W rJ FNa
to fr AO lt2' ?
MIC �.0 �ataa YfY� tL715 W6 n 7?w le
7HN CE 30MMI
1 314'
L12'
t2:46 N) +y rre-
22 {:efji YN} }
f
051 310 {
en YNl y '
'T {SjPFM?
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 11
Figure 19. Gaoling and gaslelectric-6,71::(single)tons standard efficiency,4 to 5tons high efficiency-swing diameter
for hinged door(s)option
Nato: A Idimenslons era In Inches+ntdlmc'ers
1432 MM?
21 as-
t643 MM]
376.'8' ----
!M MMI
Figure 20. Cooling and gasfeleotno-71:,s tons [dual ownpressor standard efficiency] -10 tons standard efficiency,
6 to 81:,s tans high efficiency
Now All dimensions ere In Inches,+millmelers-
for Nuri
�. sTTpppp Ior � [una[nscn ra,
waiCiL W.st.
+ilwyx!S-0�!Y'ae pty4
cw,ec •.•'awrT p.,xwe l ur
rxz w
YT4Y 6LwtGR[8�
}5 IY�r GGrhh wti
,Y'�2iM{'Mi110.!
rillwW 3W rr - -- IW.y AIF.IXiM02
li}no
44 iYF 44 - '-M wgMw.FS
a+'V,IW fyyw<•F
u�
iM is til +
12kFT'14s{WI[TT W WY
YIkFT'14s{4N[iT W
5 mnf,wo-rtk�[rbYi
arc roous�
za��na.r4aml�R[iaaR
..eeoa F1r4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 12
Figure 23. Cooling and gasfelectnc-7t,, tans (dual compressor standard efficimicy), 10 tans standard efficiency,
6 to 81:`s to-ns high efficiency;unit clearance and roof opmitig
Nata: All dimensions are In onthcJmiMmabmi-
C_LAIIANCE
C-EARANCE 36'014 MMM HCHIZON rAL FLOW-18'(457 wo
L10NNF LOW 36'(91 s MAi)
TYPICAL ROOF OPENING
CLEARANCE FROM
TOPOFUNff 72'
6i5ri' {i79�Mkq ��
{2251
MW � [118E MMI
53 1 r4
(1552 kiMJ
CLFARANCF W[ 77 r IMJ CLEARANCE A 014 MW
Figure 24. Cooling and gasfelectec-71:•s tans (dual compressor standard efficiency], 10 tons standard efficiency,
6 to Vi fins high efficiency;roof curb
Nata: Ail dimensloYli EY#In hSChesrmdlme!tem
G w: r.7a 111) ao1 z
34 wy
fees�„} :16el
60 U
=13DUR ,7
ca�ww�
L 3V4' ' - wV
i#i F141
3/2'
�{2WdJL4
a +4 Tf
- e.a NF: 6U 3f@
# mo LW 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-143 Page 13
1
.I
STARBUCKS COFFEE
IN
zat
' r
lull
13SOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
SPIN Item Number: SPIN2015-43
Project Name: Starbucks
SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #10
Meeting Date: November 10, 2015
Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, T
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance: Nine(9)
Host: Sherry Berman, Community Engagement Committee
Applicant(s) Presenting: Jonathan Spencer
City Staff Present: Jerod Potts, Planner 1
Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting htta:14ww.oilVofsouthlake_oom and clicking on'Learn More'
under Video-0n Demand;forums ar-e list-ed under SPIN by meeting date.
FORUM SUMMARY
Property Situation:
• 2,155'A- South lake Blvd_
Development Details:
+ ,applicant mentioned this is the former site of a McDonalds in the Southlake Crossing
shopping center by the gyral-Mart and Hobby Lobby
• ,applicant noted that Starbucks is proposing a 1.920 square foot caf6 with indoor and
outdoor seating and drive-through service
• Applicant said that due to the lane change from the DOT the building has been located
further back on the site. There is a 20 foot landscape area between the ROW and the
building.
+ The applicant mentioned they are trying to maintain as much parking and existing
circulation that is on site.
+ ,applicant noted the Starbucks will be a mocha brawn color with shade awnings on the
front facing Southlake Blvd. where the seating will be.
Exhibits presented at SPIN:
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-143 Page 1
6
MaE
=77-
ia
.t
QUESTIONS f CONCERNS:
None
SPI4 Ueetlng Repors are general abservxlane et SP 14 Ueetlngs by Cty slag and SPIN :tepresentailwa.The reparl Is neF.her rertatlm nor artldal
meeting mhutes:rather t serres-s Irrtarm elected and appdr led sl WW,City start,and the puhlls of-he Issues and questlars raked by re5ldents and
the general responses made. Resporses as summarized In this report shaLid rat be eaten as guarantees e'., avp car!. I,!=-res-=_d parlles are
sUanglyencaLragetlioidlow the use threugh the PtanningandZwkig Ccmmleelcn andrtrat aeticn by CIL}20r.Ic41.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-143 Page 2
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA15-143 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 02/11/2016
Project Name: Site Plan — Starbucks Drive-Thru
APPLICANT: Sterling Design Assoc., LLC OWNER: Dunhill Partners
Jon Spencer Jill Fisher Eckols
2009 W. Littleton Blvd., # 300 3100 Monticello, Ste 300
Littleton, CO 80120 Dallas, TX 75205
Phone: 303-794-4727 x. 205 Phone: 214-373-7500
Email: jon@sterlingdesignassociates.com Email: jfisher@dunhillpartners.com
City staff has reviewed the above referenced project received by the City on 02/11/16 and we offer the following
stipulations. These stipulations are hereby made conditions of site plan approval unless specifically amended
by the City Council. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please contact the appropriate staff
member.
Planning Review
Lorrie Fletcher
Planner I
Phone: (817) 748-8069
Email:lfletcher ci.southlake.tx.us
1. Bufferyards are required on all boundaries of the site. A variance has been requested for
relief from bufferyards for the east, south and west boundaries.
2. Because the proposed structure is located within the Corridor Overlay Zone and is less than
6,000 square feet, a pitched roof is required (see Section 43.12). A variance has been
requested to allow the parapet roof as proposed.
3. For structures located within the Corridor Overlay Zone —exposed structural support columns
shall be constructed of, or clad in, the same masonry material as the principal structure. A
variance has been requested to allow the columns around the patio area as proposed.
The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may
benefit and does not represent a requirement.
• Staff recommends providing a materials sample board.
• All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-143 Page 1
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
Because the property is a platted lot within the entire development, bufferyards are required to
be provided around the perimeter of the property. Because of existing conditions the applicant
cannot provide the required bufferyards area along the east, west, and south bufferyards but is
providing the required plant material within the landscape areas of the property.
Leased Pad Site Developments: Pad site developments which are ground leases (as opposed
to separate platted lots) and a part of a larger planned commercial center shall be required to
provide bufferyards along the perimeter of the project, but shall not be required to provide
bufferyards along lease lines common to the larger commercial center.
1. The plant material provided along with the existing plant material meets the interior landscape
and bufferyards plant material requirements but the "Provided" plant material for the Canopy
Trees and Accent Trees seems to be incorrect. Fix the "Provided" sections within in the Interior
Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Charts to match what is being shown on the landscape
plan design.
2. Clearly identify on the landscape plan the existing trees that are being taken credit for required
bufferyards and interior landscaping.
Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Alex Ayala, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8274
E-mail: aayala ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. Provide preliminary water, sewer, drainage and grading plans for this development.
3. Construction within FM 1709 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit
application prior to site plan approval.
4. Fire lane radii shall be 30' minimum.
5. Dimension the proposed drive, including the median. Refer to Driveway Ordinance No. 634
for design criteria.
Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be
found in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-143 Page 2
EASEMENTS:
Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of
way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be
constructed to City standards.
WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS:
1. Minimum size for water and sewer lines is 8".
2. Size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. The existing site contains a 2"
domestic meter; consider verifying with MEP to insure size is adequate and utilize the existing
location of the tap. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one
inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. Existing irrigation meter is 1".
Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of
way.
Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
Water and sewer lines in public easements or right of way shall be constructed to City
standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Update runoff calculations to the City of Fort Worth iSWMM manual.
2. Runoff from this development will enter the TxDOT storm drain system. Verify capacity of
existing system, approval from TxDOT may be required.
Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets.
Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #18 and requires a fee to be paid prior to
beginning construction ($212.61/Acre).
Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City's website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines
pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
Access permit is required prior to construction FM 1709. Permit approval is required before
beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-143 Page 3
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817)
748-8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclementsa-ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
No comments based on submitted information.
Informational Comments:
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type
of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
* Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall,
stone, rock or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be
considered a masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath
mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco
finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g.,
EIFS —exterior insulation and finish systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar
characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry material.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-143 Page 4
Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21,
Building Color Standards for Non-Residential Buildings.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must
be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street
Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-143 Page 5
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
I1970
01'5
1 c
503
O 1 1
U
2225 / R v, •
1'
900 1 + �
y 1 ,1 $ 30a ,�1 t90` X903 2 9 si
A $
t2� 519
ZoningOwner Name • • Response
1. HOLIDAN INVESTMENTS INC C2 2210 W SOUTH LAKE BLVD 1.04 NR
2. COMPASS BANCSHARES INC C2 2200 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.89 NR
3. SLM DUNHILL LLC C3 2055 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.82 F
4. SLM DUNHILL LLC C3 2101 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.11 F
5. MCDONALDS CORP C3 2155 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.10 NR
6. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF SPI 2100 W SOUTH LAKE BLVD 2.95 NR
7. WALMART REAL ESTATE BUS C3 2201 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 5.76 NR
TRUST
F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Seven (7)
Responses Received: One (1)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-143 Page 1
Notification Response Form
ZA15-143
Meeting Date February 18,2016 at 6:30 PAA
SLM OUNHiLL LLC
3100 MONTICELLO AVE STE 300
DALLAS,TX 76205
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of D
opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Site Plan referenoed above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature: Date:
Additional Signature: Date:
Printed Name(s):
Musi oa praper'y owner(a�whp! nvrna(s)aria print�alwp. Othe se aonWWOPbmlPlanruno Dcper.mer-. Oree brm per properly.
Phone Nurnr (optional): (
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-143 Page 2