Item 6C CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
MEMORANDUM
February 9, 2016
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Ken Baker, Senior Director of Planning and Development Services
Subject: Item 6C —Ordinance No. 907A
Action Requested: Consider 2nd reading for amendments to Chapters 10
"Health and Sanitation, Article V "Public Smoking" and 12
"Parks and Recreation, Article II "City Parks," of the
Southlake City Code.
Background
Information: To regulate the use of e-cigarettes within the City limits in
the same manner as smoking tobacco products.
Financial
Considerations: None
Strategic Link: Safety & Security— C1 Achieve the highest standards of
safety & security and C3 Provide attractive & unique
spaces for enjoyment of personal interests.
Citizen Input /
Board Review: A SPIN Forum was held January 26, 2016. The summary
report has been included as pages 2-4 of this memo.
An email has been received in opposition to the proposed
Ordinance and has been included as page 5 of this memo.
Legal Review: The draft ordinance has been provided to the City Attorney
for review.
Supporting
Document: Attached —Ordinance No. 907A (redline copy)
Staff
Recommendation: Approve as presented or provide feedback for
modification(s).
1
QJ SOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
Case Number: SPIN16-002
Project Name: Amendment to Chapter 10 Article V of the City's Smoking
Ordinance related to Electronic Smoking Devices
SPIN Neighborhood: Citywide
Meeting Date: January 26, 2016
Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance: 23
Host: Bobbie Heller, CEC
Applicant(s) Presenting: Ken Baker, Senior Director of Planning and Development Services
City Staff Present: Patty Moos, Planner I
City Staff Contact: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner 1, email: Ifletchera-ci.southlake.tx.us phone:817-
748-8069
Attached to the end of this report are the Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the January 26,2016 SPIN Town
Hall Formas
Presentation begin: 6:05 pm Presentation end: 6:15 pm
Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.citVofsouthlake.com and clicking on"Learn More"
under Video On Demand;forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date.
FORUM SUMMARY:
Property Situation: Citywide
Development Details:
Amendment to Chapter 10, Article V. Public Smoking Ordinance No. 907A
Two changes to the ordinance:
• Distance requirement moved from 12 feet to 20 feet from doors
• E-cigarette regulations to limit ENDS (Electronic Nicotine Delivery System) and PV
(personal vaporizers) in all public places
Amendment detail to add definition for e-cigarettes, distance to doors, and use in public
spaces and 10-153 for parks and designated areas.
City Council dates for the ordinance: February 2, 2016, first reading at 5:30 pm and
February 16, 2016, 2nd reading at 5:30 pm.
2
Current Smoking Ordinance
WPM
• No smoking in a public building or within 12 feet of an E-cigarettes.also called Electronic Nicotine Delivery
entrance to a public building Systems(ENDS)or personal vaporizers (PV) 11.11 L
• "smoke"or"smoking"means inhaling, exhaling, or FDA does not currently regulate
burning a lighted cigar; cigarette,pipe or other lighted Few studies on the effects of second hand e-
tobacco product in any manner or form. cigarette smoke
World Health Organization proposed a hon on the
use of e-cigarettes indoors.
E- Cigarette Components 14
>mcrwukn,m,v �•_�.......... American Academy of Pediatrics
""`"""e0e nsarmaaocsssox .•.. .-. Sales of e-cigarettes to minors younger than 18 years should be prohibited.
!�a,iEfi cw•ds�eatn'
rte igM
• Candy and fruit flavored e-cigarettes.which encourage youth smoking
initiation.should be banned.
• Federal. state.and local governments should enact and enforce laws that
mandate the provision of smoke-free environments, including e-cigarette
vapor. in all public places and require employers to provide smoke-freele-
" cigarette vapor-free work emnronments for their employees.
Amendment Details Added Definition -10.151
• Add definition for Electronic Smoking Device(Section Electronic smoking device means an electronic or battery-
10-1551) operated device that delivers vapors for inhalation.This term shall
include every variation and type of such devices whether they are
• Include Electronic Smoking Device to list of prohibited manufactured. distributed: marketed or sold as an electronic
smoking acts(Section 10-152) cigarette.an electronic cigar:an electronic cigarillo. an electronic
pipe, an electronic hookah or any other product name or
descriptor.
HG SMOKING wiraixrs Fl OFINTEMRr
Amended Definition- 10.151 Amended Text- 10.152 (a)
Sec.10-152. Smcking prohibited in public buildings, or
'Smoke or smoking':means inhaling.exhaling.or burning a within 4-2 20 feet of an entrance or exit t0 a public building-,
lighted cigar,cigarette,pipe or other lighted tobacco product in
any manner or form:or inhalingexhaling from an electronic signs required, and prohibited acts.
smoking device.
3
Amended Text Amended Text
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to perform the following acts in
any public building in the city or within 12 2D feet of any entrance Sec.10-153.City Parks. _
or exit to any public building _
1) Smoke. Smokingyrohibited except in designated areas.
2) Garry a lighted cigarette,ci(jar.tobacco-containing pipe,or an
operating electronic smoking device. or Sec.1232. -Rules and regulations.[rhissectlon will hedeleted frumthe City Gude)
3) Light a cigarette,cigar,tobacco-containing pipe or operate an The following regulations and restrictions are prescribed for the use of city
electronic smoking device. parks:
_ SrAgk:Ag P,1P :b;j9d.. Gpf W.1...-:.,...jed f{51...11 big -,.'Ehf. jo
R
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS:
1. Comment- Alternative studies, both positive and negative, are rarely citied, it is not
smoke, it is a water vapor. To outlaw this doesn't pass a common sense test. What is
driving this?
Response: City Council wants to check into this. Vapor is safer, but some
metals are elevated and the AAP study on this. City Council has
previously visited this item in the past. This is a tool for citizens to respond
or speak. You may send an email to the Planning Department or City
Council or attend the meeting.
2. The smell of both vapor and cigarettes can be smelled in Starbucks. It can hurt
business.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives.The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes;rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials,City staff,and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
4
From:William Johnson
Date: February 2,2016 at 11:44:44 PM CST
To:"mayorandcitycounciI Rci.southlake_tx_us' <mayorandcitycounciIO#ci.southlake_tx_Us>
Subject:An ordinance—9D7A—
a. Smoking bans are ostensibly enacted to protect the public from the harm of
secondhand smoke, but e-cigarettes have not been found to pose a risk to
bystanders. In fact,all evidence to date shows that the low health risks associated
with a-cigarettes are comparable to other smokeless nicotine products.
b. The low risks of e-cigarettes is supported by research done by Dr. Siegel of
Boston University, Dr. Eissenberg of Virginia Commonwealth; DrMaciej L
Goniewicz of the Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Dr Laugesen of Health New
Zealand, Dr. Igor Burstyn of Drexel University. and by the fact that the FDA
testing, in spite of its press statement; failed to find harmful levels of carcinogens
or toxic levels of any chemical in the vapor.
c_ A comprehensive review conducted by Dr. Igor Burstyn of Drexel University
School of Public Health based on over 9,000 observations of e-c garette liquid and
vapor found"no apparent concern"for bystanders exposed to e-Cigarette vapor,
even under"worst case" assumptions about exposure.
d. Electronic cigarette use is easy to distinguish from actual smoking. Although some
e-cigarettes resemble real cigarettes, many do not. It is easy to tell when someone
lights a cigarette from the smell of smoke. E-cigarette vapor is often practically
odorless, and generally any detectable odor is not unpleasant and smells nothing
like smoke. Additionally,e-cigarette users can decide whether to release any vapor
("discreet vaping")_ With so little evidence of use,enforcing use bans on electronic
cigarettes would be nearly impossible.
e. The ability to use electronic cigarettes in public spaces will actually improve public
health by inspiring other smokers to switch and reduce their health risks by an
estimated 99%.
f. Losing the ability to test e-liquids before purchasing will have a significant and
negative impact on yourability to purchas&sell e-liquids.
g. Many smokers first try e-cigarettes because they can use them where they cannot
smoke, however; they often become"accidental quitters."This is a documented
phenomenon unique to e-cigarettes_ It may take a few months oronly a few days,
but they inevitably stop smoking conventional cigarettes_This is why including e,-
cigarettes in smoking bans could have.serious unintended consequences!
h. By making e-cigarette users go outdoors; the City will also be sending a strong
message to traditional smokers that a-cigarettes are no safer than smoking. This
will actually maintain the number of smokers: rather than help reduce smoking.
This is a far more realistic risk to public health than any unfounded concems about
possible youth or nonsmoker use uptake. In fact, the most recent report by the
CDC showed that the dramatic inc rease in e-cigarette use over that past 3 years
has not led to an increase in youth smoking. Youth smoking of traditional
cigarettes continues todecIineto record low levels.
i. The c hiIdran of smoking parents are far more likely to bec oma smokers than the
children of non-smoking parents who see smoking behaviors in public. The children
of smoking parents who quit aren't any more likely to smoke than those of non
smoking parents. Prohibiting vapor products in public does little to protect the
children of non-smoking parents from becoming smokers, but significantly
increases the likelihood that many smoking parents won't switch to e-cigarettes.
This only serves to keep the highest-risk children at risk.
j. E-cigarette use does not promote the smoking of traditional cigarettes, nor does it
threaten the gains of tobacco control over the past few decades. In fact, by
normalizing a-cigarette use overtraditional smoking; the efforts of tobacco control
are being supported. If anything,e�cigarette use denormalizes conventional
smoking by setting the example of smokers c housing a far less harmful alternative
to traditional smoking. The CDC surveys clearly show that there has been no
"gateway effect" causing nonsmokers to start smoking. As e-cigarettes have
become more popular. all available evidence is showing that more and more
smokers are quitting traditional cigarettes, including youth smokers.
5
ORDINANCE NO.907a
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE V, "PUBLIC
SMOKING", OF THE SOUTHLAKE CITY CODE TO PROHIBIT
SMOKING IN ALL PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND WITHIN 4-2-20 FEET OF
THE ENTRANCE TO A PUBLIC BUILDING, REQUIRING "NO
SMOKING" SIGNS IN RESTAURANTS, BARS AND TAVERNS;
PROHIBITING CERTAIN ACTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS AND CODIFICATION;PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY AND PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, finds that secondhand
tobacco smoke is a major contributor to indoor air pollution and that breathing secondhand
smoke (also known as environmental tobacco smoke) is a cause of disease in healthy
nonsmokers, including heart disease, stroke, respiratory disease, and lung cancer, and further
finds as follows:
WHEREAS, the National Cancer Institute in 1999 found that secondhand smoke is
responsible for the early deaths of approximately 53,000 Americans annually. (National Cancer
Institute (NCI), "Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: the report of the
California Environmental Protection Agency. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 10,"
Bethesda,MD:National Institutes of Health,National Cancer Institute(NCI),August 1999)l-
WHEREAS,
999);WHEREAS, the Public Health Service's National Toxicology Program(NTP)has listed
secondhand smoke as a known carcinogen. (See Environmental Health Information Service
(EHIS), "Environmental tobacco smoke: first listed in the Ninth Report on Carcinogens," US.
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service, NTP, 2000;
reaffirmed by the NTP in subsequent reports on carcinogens,2003,2005)l-
WHEREAS,
005);WHEREAS, based on a fmding by the California Environmental Protection Agency in
2005, the California Air Resources Board has determined that secondhand smoke is a toxic air
contaminant, fmding that exposure to secondhand smoke has serious health effects, including
low birth-weight babies; sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS); increased respiratory infections
in children; asthma in children and adults; lung cancer, sinus cancer, and breast cancer in
younger, premenopausal women; heart disease; and death. (Appendix II Findings of the
Scientific Review Panel: Findings of the Scientific Review Panel on Proposed Identification of
Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant as adopted at the Panel's June 24,
2005 Meeting," California Air Resources Board(ARB),September 12,2005)l-
WHEREAS,
005);WHEREAS, there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke, (Environmental
Protection Agency(EPA), "Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other
disorders, the report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Smoking and Tobacco
Control Monograph 4," Bethesda,MD:National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute;
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), August 1993; California. Environmental Protection
Agency, "Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke," 1997; California Air
Resources Board, "Proposed identification of environmental tobacco smoke as a toxic air
contaminant," Sacramento: California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA). Air
Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Air Quality Measures Branch, Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment(OEHHA),September 29,2005)l-
WHEREAS,
005);WHEREAS, a study of hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction in Helena,
Montana before, during, and after a local law eliminating smoking in workplaces and public
places was in effect,has determined that laws to enforce smokefree workplaces and public places
may be associated with a reduction in morbidity from heart disease. (Sargent, Richard P.1-
Shepard,
.;Shepard, Robert M; Glantz, Stanton A., "Reduced incidence of admissions of myocardial
infarction associated with public smoking ban: before and after study,"British Medical Journal
328:977-980,April 24,2004)l-
WHEREAS,
004);WHEREAS, secondhand smoke is particularly hazardous to elderly people, individuals
with cardiovascular disease, and individuals with impaired respiratory function, including
asthmatics and those with obstructive airway disease. (California Environmental Protection
Agency (Cal EPA), "Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke," Tobacco
Control 6(4)346-353,Winter, 1997)l-
WHEREAS,
997);WHEREAS, the Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires that disabled persons
have access to public places and workplaces, deems impaired respiratory function to be a
disability. (Daynard,R.A., "Environmental tobacco smoke and the Americans with Disabilities
Act,"Nonsmokers'Voice 15(l):8-9.)l-
WHEREAS,
5(1):8-9.);WHEREAS, the U.S. Surgeon General has determined that the simple separation of
smokers and nonsmokers within the same air space may reduce, but does not eliminate, the
exposure of nonsmokers to secondhand smoke. (Department of Health and Human Services.
The Heath Consequences of Involuntary Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Public
Health Service,Centers for Disease Control, 1986)l-
WHEREAS,
986);WHEREAS, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have determined that
the risk of acute myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease associated with exposure to
tobacco smoke is non-linear at low doses, increasing rapidly with relatively small doses such as
those received from secondhand smoke or actively smoking one or two cigarettes a day, and has
warned that all patients at increased risk of coronary heart disease or with known coronary artery
disease should avoid all indoor environments that permit smoking. (Pechacek, Terry F.; Babb,
Stephen, "Commentary: How acute and reversible are the cardiovascular risks of secondhand
smoke?" British Medical Journal 328:980-983,April 24,2004)l-
WHEREAS,
004);WHEREAS, given the fact that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke,
the American Society of Heating,Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers(AHRAE)bases
its ventilation standards on totally smokefree environments. ASHRAE has determined that there
is currently no air filtration or other ventilation technology that can completely eliminate all the
carcinogenic components in secondhand smoke and the health risks caused by secondhand
smoke exposure, and recommends that indoor environments be smokefree in their entirety.
(Samet, J.; Bohanon, Jr., H.R.; Coultas, D.B.; Houston, T.P.; Persily, A.K.; Schoen, L.J.;
2
Spengler,J.; Callway, C.A.,"ASHRAE position document on environmental tobacco smoke and
the development of acute coronary syndromes: the CARDIO2000 case-control study," Tobacco
Control 11(3)220-225, September 2005)1-
WHEREAS,
005);WHEREAS, the Society of Actuaries has determined that secondhand smoke costs the
U.S. economy roughly $10 billion a year: $5 billion in estimated medical costs associated with
secondhand smoke exposure, and$4.6 billion in lost productivity. (Behan, D.F.; Eriksen,M.P.,-
Lin,
.P.;Lin, Y., "Economic Effects of Environmental Tobacco Smoke,"Society of Actuaries, March 31,
2005)1-
WHEREAS,
005); WHEREAS, numerous economic analyses examining restaurant and hotel receipts and
controlling for economic variables have shown either no difference or a positive economic
impact after enactment of laws requiring workplaces to be smokefree. Creation of smokefree
workplaces is sound economic policy and provides the maximum level of employee health and
safety. (Glantz, S.A. & Smith, L. The effect of ordinances requiring smokefree restaurants on
restaurant sales in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 87:1687-1693, 1997;
Colman,R.;Urbonas, C.M.,"The economic impact of smoke-free workplaces: an assessment for
Nova Scotia, prepared for Tobacco Control Unit, Nova Scotia Department of Health," GPI
Atlantic, September 2001)1-
WHEREAS,
001);WHEREAS, hundreds of communities in the U.S., plus numerous states, including
Texas, California, Delaware, Florida, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, New York, and
Washington, have enacted laws requiring workplaces, restaurants, bars, and other public places
to be smokefree, as have numerous countries, including Ireland, New Zealand, Norway,
Scotland,Sweden,Uganda,and Uruguay;
WHEREAS, smoking is a potential cause of fires, cigarette and cigar burns and ash
stains on merchandise and fixtures, and other economic damage to businesses. (`The high price
of cigarette smoking,"Business&Health 15(8),Supplement A:6-9,August 1997)1-
WHEREAS,
997);WHEREAS, the City Council finds there is no legal or constitutional "right to smoke."
Business owners have no legal or constitutional right to expose their employees and customers to
the toxic chemicals in secondhand smoke. On the contrary,employers have a common law duty
to provide their workers with a workplace that is not unreasonably dangerous;
WHEREAS,the City Council fmds the congregation of smokers within 42-20 feet of the
entrances or exits of buildings in which smoking is prohibited can impair entry into and exit from
these buildings, create noxious clouds of concentrated nuisance smoke that harm the rights of
nonsmoking patrons and passersby,and create a hazard of such concentrated smoke drifting into
the indoor environment;and
WHEREAS, the City Council Also the smoking of tobacco is a form of air
pollution,a positive danger to health,and a material public nuisance.
WHEREAS,the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends local governments should
enact and enforce laws that mandate the provision of smoke-free environments, including e-
3
cigarette vapor, in all public places and require employers to provide smoke-free/e-cigarette
vapor free work environments for their employees. -Accordingly, the City Council finds and
declares that the purposes of this ordinance are (1) to protect the public health and welfare by
prohibiting smoking in public places and places of employment, (2) to guarantee the right of
nonsmokers to breathe smoke-free air, and(3)to recognize that the need to breathe smoke-free
air shall have priority over the desire to smoke.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
The declarations,determinations and findings made in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby adopted and made a part of the operative provisions hereof.
SECTION 2.
The Article V, Chapter 10 of the Southlake City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
ARTICLE V.
PUBLIC SMOKING
See. 10-151.Definitions.
The following definitions shall apply to this article:
"Smoke" or "Smoking" means inhaling, exhaling, or burning a lighted cigar, cigarette,
pipe or other lighted tobacco product in any manner or form, or inhaling, exhaling from an
electronic smoking device.
"Electronic smoking device"means an electronic or battery-operated device that delivers
vapors for inhalation. This term shall include every variation and type of such devices whether
they are manufactured, distributed, marketed or sold as an electronic cigarette, an electronic
cigar,an electronic cigarillo,an electronic pipe, an electronic hookah or an, other ther product name
or descriptor.
"Person"means any individual.
"Public building"means any building other than a building used as a private residence. If
portions of a building are used as a private residence and another portion of the building is used
for business purposes or commercial activities,then"public building" as used herein shall apply
to the portions of the building used for business purposes or commercial purposes, but not the
portion used solely as a residence. The term "public building" includes, but is not limited to,
restaurants,bars and taverns.
4
"Restaurant"means an establishment that primarily serves food prepared in the kitchen of
the same establishment for patrons and may serve alcohol with a valid Texas Alcoholic Beverage
Commission License as long as the establishment derives less than 75% of its gross revenues
from alcohol sales and includes all indoor and outdoor seating areas,kitchen,bar area,restrooms
and lobby.
"Bar" or "Tavern" means an establishment that derives 75% or more of the
establishment's gross revenue from the on-premise sale of alcoholic beverages.
Sec. 10-152. Smoking prohibited in public buildings, or within 41-20 feet of an
entrance or exit to a public building;signs required;and prohibited acts.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to perform the following acts in any public
building in the City of Southlake or within 4-2---20 feet of any entrance or exit to any public
building:
(1) smoke,
(2) carry a lighted cigarette, cigar, or tobacco-containing pipe, or an�- Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.5",Hanging: 0.5"
operating electronic smoking device,or
(3) light a cigarette, cigar or tobacco-containing pipe or operate aria- Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.5",Hanging: 0.5"
electronic smoking device.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any owner of any restaurant, bar and tavern to allow the
operation of the establishment unless one or more of the following signs have been posted at a
location clearly visible to a person entering the establishment:
(1) a"No Smoking"sign,or
(2) the international"No Smoking" symbol(depiction of a burning cigarette enclosed
in a red circle with a red bar across it).
(c) It shall be unlawful for any owner or operator of any public building to place or
allow to be placed any of the following items in any public building or within 4-2-20 feet from an
entrance or exit to any public building:
(1) ashtrays;
(2) smoking paraphernalia,or
(3) signs that indicate that smoking is permitted.
(d) It shall be unlawful for the owner or operator of any public building to allow
smoking in such public building in violation of the provisions of this article.
5
Sec.10-153.City Parks. Formatted:Font:Bold
Smokingprohibitedexcept in designated areas., Formatted:Font:Not Bold
Sec. 10-1543.Penalty.
Any person who violates this article shall be guilty of a health and sanitation
misdemeanor violation and subject to a fine of not more than$500.00.Each day that a violation
is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Any association, partnership or
cooperation that violates this article shall be guilty of a health and sanitation misdemeanor
violation and subject to a fine of not more than $2000.00. Each day that a violation is permitted
to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Sec. 12-32.-Rules and regulations.(This section will be deleted from the City Code) ' Formatted:Font:Times New Roman
Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.5..
The following regulations and restrictions are prescribed for the use of city parks:
Formatted:Strikethrough
H144, e,4Ak
Formatted:Font:Times New Roman,Not
Bold,Italic
SECTION 3.
Sections 10-154 through 10-158 of the Southlake City Code are hereby repealed effective
on 3uH+--March 1,201687-.
SECTION 4.
If any provision of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or
circumstances, shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance
which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the
provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable.
SECTION 5.
It is the intention of the City Council that this ordinance shall become a part of the Code
of the City of Southlake, Texas, and it may be renumbered and codified therein accordingly, in
the manner approved by the City Attorney. The Code of the City of Southlake, Texas, as
amended,shall remain in full force and effect,save and except as amended by this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
This ordinance shall take effect on duffwMarch 1,201687-,following final passage by the
City Council and publication in accordance with the Charter of the City of Southlake.
6
JPASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING THIS DAY OF Few Code Changed
920160-7.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF
201607.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
EFFECTIVE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
7