Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Item 6F (3)
Mainstreet Southlake ZA15-072 Comments after January 26, 2016 • Patty Moos From: Skip Leake Sent: Monday, February 01,2016 4:40 PM To: Ken Baker(kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us); Patty Moos (pmoos@ci.southlake.tx.us) Cc: Joseph A. Bonola DDS(NextCenturyDentalS@sbcglobal.net); Kristen Duwe Bonola (kdbonola@sbcglobal.net); Marybeth Crane Subject: Case:ZA15-072:Tract 9:Address 409 Shady Lane, Beneficial Owner Attachments: 200 ft Landowners Record of support.pdf; BK_Ord_Approve_Settlement.pdf;215203004 _Deed.pdf;011316FILEDTRUSTEEMOTIONTOCOMP.pdf Mr. Baker and Ms. Moos: I represent Mary Elizabeth Crane, DPM. Dr. Crane is the former spouse of James N. Mertz. The attached landowners record of support is incorrect as to the actual ownership of the acreage located at 409 Shady Lane (the"Property") Pursuant to the above documents, Dr. Crane is the beneficial owner of the Property,pending final approval of the Trustee's Motion in the United States BR Court for the Northern District in Fort Worth. Dr. Crane would be the only person able to responding to the inquiry sent out by the City of Southlake on the referenced Zoning Case. My understanding is that the subject zoning case has been reset for hearing tomorrow night at the council meeting for the City of Southlake. Please be advised that Dr. Crane supports the application as submitted by the proponent. Dr. Crane will be present at the meeting tomorrow night and can express her support personally as appropriate. Should you need any further communications in this regard,please advise. Thank you for your consideration. W T Skip Leake, Attorney For Dr. Crane W.T. Skip Leake Attorney&Counselor at Law Landmark Building 2201 North Collins Street, Suite 130(76011) P.O.Box 201786 Arlington,Texas 76006-1786 Phone:(817)460-7711 Fax:(817)469-7020 Email: wtsleake(a,wtskipleake.com IMPORTANT NOTICE:This email and all attachments transmitted with it contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the named addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended named addressee, you are hereby notified that any reading,dissemination,distribution,copying or other use of this communication and its attachments is protected by the attorney client privilege and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,please notify the sender by telephone 1 Support Outside 200 ft. • 2/2/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-FIN:Favor for Mainstreet Project mart or SOUTH AHolly Blake <hblake ci .southlakek.us> FW: Favor for Mainstreet Project• 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:01 AM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Angela Bowers [mailto Sent: Tuesday, February 02, To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Favor for Mainstreet Project I am in favor of bringing more core medical services to Southlake. The neighborhood coalition to stop the Mainstreet Project makes me wonder if they are against anything being built as this project is needed and would add value to our community. Please vote in favor of the Mainstreet Project. Angela Bowers, MD Confidentiality Notice:This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information exempt from disclosure under applicable law.Unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is strictly prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all original copies of the message.Thank you. haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/Onui=28ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=152a2ee2f08f150d&simi=152a2ee2f08f150d 1/1 ' 1/28/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:Support for Mainstream Rehab Resort • OC6TY SCUM; Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Support for Mainstream Rehab Resort 1 message • Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:43 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: "'Heather Peyrovi'via Mayor and City Council" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Date: January 27, 2016 at 8:18:44 PM CST To: mavorandcitycouncil(caci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Subjec : Supportr =stream Rehab Resort Reply To: Heather Peyrovi To Whom It May Concern: I want to extend my support for the Mainstream Rehab Resort plan to build at the corner of 114 and Kimball Ave. This facility would be a great asset to Southlake and the surrounding businesses as well as adjacent communities. The planning and proposal presented by the Mainstream Rehab Resort are beautiful and fit nicely on the lot they are proposing to purchase. These are the types of businesses we need moving into Southlake. They compliment the new hospitals and other medical facilities that have created jobs and made Southlake a further destination place. I appreciate you voting to bring this business to our community. Sincerely, Heather Peyrovi 1000 Whittington Place Southlake, Texas 76092 https://mal.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox8 152861d59d680b3f&sim1=152861d59d680b3f 1/1 ' 2/2/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Malt-FW:Mainstreet Project-support OSOIJVary Or THLAKEHolly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: Mainstreet Project= support 1 message , Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci:southlake.tx.us> Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:43 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Renita Sloan [mail Sent: Tuesday, February 0 , To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Mainstreet Project Dear Mayor Hill and City Council Members, I'm emailing you regarding tonight's city council meeting. My husband and I will be in attendance for the meeting tonight, but I also wanted to send an email letting you know that we are in favor of the Mainstreet Rehab Resort Project. Sincerely, Renita Sloan haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&tir152a022a3ae14a58&sim1=152a34b881caf860 1/1 2/2/2016 Ci.southlake.bc.us Mail-Fwd:Mainstreet Rehab Support • op • Os01Jr'-ILJE Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Mainstreet Rehab Support 1 message Lori Payne<Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> .Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:09,AM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: Katherine Glore Date: February 2, 2016 a . . To: mayorandcitycouncilaci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Kristen Bonola Subject: Mainstree a>la uppo Hello, As a potential Southlake property owner currently assessing relocation areas, we wanted to voice our support for the Mainstreet Rehab project currently before the city council. We believe this project is in line with the core values of Southlake and will only add to Southlake's reputation as a prime provider of key services and businesses, especially it's ever increasing presence in the specialty medical market. While we are not averse to the importance of protecting natural resources within city boundaries, we believe doing so at the expense of prime 114 frontage will not be in the best long term financial interests and reputation of both Southlake and Tarrant County. We implore you to consider this project with favor as it is our belief it's addition will further establish Southlake as a key player in the ever competing suburban markets, raise property values, tax revenues and provide much needed jobs for Tarrant County. Thank you for your consideration. Gary & Katherine Glore 214-450-6039 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=152a250192a062c7&simi=152a250r92a062c7 1/1 ' 2/2/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:Support for Main Street Rehab Project gno9F Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Support for Main Street Rehab Project 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:36 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us • Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: "Leigh Wambsganss" Date: February 1, 2016 at 9: : To: <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Support for Main Street Rehab Project Dear Mayor and Council; As a person who had to travel a great distance for post surgical rehab myself—as well as a person with a very ill family member who had to be in transitional care for months —I feel this rehab facility is greatly needed by Southlake residents. This is to register my support for this project. I believe it is on tomorrow's agenda. Blessings, Leigh Wambsganss 1507 Chimney Works Drive Southlake, TX 76092 haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&searchpinbox&th=152a00d2616b0c7a&simI=152a00d2616b0c7a 1/1 • 2/2/2016 Ci.souttlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:Southlake rehab facility-city council meeting February 2,2016 rai UGLY OF SOUFHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> • Fwd: Southlake rehab facility - city council meeting February 2, 2016 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:52 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From:Janet Shuff iiiiii. Date: February 1, a . To: kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us, placer@ci.southlake.tx.us, place2@ci.southlake.tx.us, place4@southlake.tx.us, place5@ci.southiake.tx.us, place6@southlake.tx.us, mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Re: Southlake rehab facility-city council meeting February 2, 2016 Janet B. Shuff 1605 Forest Vista Court Southlake, TX 76092 (817-)329-7353 To: Mayor Laura Hill; Ken Baker, Shahid Shafi; Shawn McCaskill; Brandon Bledsoe; Randy Williamson; John Huffman; Gary Fawks; City Council Chambers Dear Council members, I would like to add my name to the list of friends and neighbors who are https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1529fae428b60893&sim1=1529fae428b60893 1/3 • 2/2/2016 Ci.southlaketx.us Mail-Fwd:Southlake rehab facility-city council meeting February 2,2016 excited at the prospect of having a rehab facility on the frontage road of Hwy114 just east of Kimball. The new jobs would benefit our community. The opportunity to have a good rehab facility locally would be a wonderful addition as well. I've heard that the primary obstacle to this project is an area of trees on the 5.7 acre piece of land. I've also heard that the plan for the rehab facility includes planting more trees than presently grow there. Obviously, the developer is concerned about the esthetics of the new facility and landscape. I understand the feelings of homeowners adjacent to this land. Right now they have a view of trees and field without the cost of owning the land. However, that land has, for more than 12 years, been zoned commercial. Quibbling about trees (which will be replaced) has, I think, more to do with wanting something for haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1529fae428b60893&sim1=1529fae428b60893 2/3 • 2/2/2016 Ci.southlake.bc.us Mail-Fwd:Soutllake rehab facility-city council meeting February 2,2016 nothing than it has to do with being reasonable and thinking about what is best for this community. I ask you, respectfully, to please help make Southlake even better than it already is by adding this quality rehab facility to our community. Thank you! Sincerely, Janet B Shuff https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1529fae428b60893&simI=1529fae428b60893 3/3 2/2/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:Mainstreet Project-support �Gt'Y �HLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Mainstreet Project - support 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:59 PM To: mayor-int@ci.'southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: "'Angelique Schlosser'via Mayor and City Council" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci. southlake.tx.us> Date: February 1, 2016 at 9:49:01 PM CST To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Mainstreet Project Reply To:Angelique Schlosser Dear Mayor Hill and members of City Council, I am writing to you this evening to express my support for the Mainstream Rehab project. I truly believe that Southlake needs a facility like this one. This project will not only bring skilled jobs to the area, but perhaps most importantly, it will allow loved ones to stay close to home in the time of need. Many people that are afflicted by injury or illness will be discharged from a hospital much too soon. With the exception of home care (which most people cannot afford) and facilities much farther from here, patients do not have many suitable alternatives. I strongly urge you to reconsider this project. The building will not be an eyesore, but rather a welcome site to many Southlake residents in need of interim healthcare/rehabilitation. With best regards, Angelique Schlosser 915 Parkview Ln Southlake haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&tt=152a022a3ae14a58&sim1=152a022a3ae14a58 1/1 2/2/2016 Ci.southlake.bc.us Mail-Fwd:mainstreet project-support • iggibuniLlaucEoF .Holly Blake <hblake@ci-southlake.tx.us> • Fwd: mainstreet project - support 1 message Lori Payne<Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:46 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: Mike Sandlin Date: February 1, 2 a : To: "mayorandcitycounciI ci.southlake.tx.us" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Subjec : mains ee probe We support the mainstreet project Mike sandlin 5137 davis N.R.H.,Tx haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=152a016fa51c9r61&sim1=152a016ra51c9r61 1/1 2/2/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-RN:Mainstreet Rehab Resort-In Favor Of OSOIJwary OF THLAKEHolly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: Mainstreet Rehab Resort - In Favor Of 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:22 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Scott Heikkila [mailto11.111.1111111 Sent: Monday, February 01, To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Mainstreet Rehab Resort- In Favor Of Mayor Hill & City Council Members, I'm writing in support of the Mainstreet Rehab Resort project. I attended and spoke in favor of the project at the last meeting and unfortunately may not be able to attend tomorrow's meeting. As a Southlake resident of 12 years, family of five, 3 boys in CISD, I find the planned use for this property very appealing; a needed service and well planned property without the traffic and chaos associated to a retail strip center. I hope that you will approve this as submitted and let them move forward with the project. Thank you, Scott Heikkila 1341 Ten Bar Trail Southlake https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=28ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1529f5c623268f9a&sim1=1529f5c623268f9a 1/1 2/2/2016 Ci.souWake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:In Favor of Mainstreet Rehab 6r,Y • OSOJnILAKE Ho • lly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> • Fwd: In Favor of Mainstreet Rehab 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Feb 2,2016 at 8:35 AM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: SHANNON HEIKKILA Date: February 2, 2016 at 8:2 11/111111.11.111 To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: In Favor of Mainstreet Rehab I was at last months meeting, but not able to make tonight's. 1341 ten bar Trl Southlake, TX. 76092 Shannon Heikkila 817-995-3938 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=152a2694c8c8c692&sim1=152a2694c8c8c692 1/1 2/1/2016 Ci.southlake.bc.us Mail-FW:Support for the Resort Rehab facility Ocity Of SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> • FW: Support for the Resort Rehab facility 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:04 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Cheryl Staley [mailto Sent: Monday, February 01,1M.111111.11 To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Support for the Resort Rehab facility Southlake Mayor& City Council, I am a real estate agent with Briggs Freeman Sotheby's International Realty and work out of the Southlake office located in the Southlake Town Center. Being in real estate I keep a close eye on the continued residential and commercial development in Southlake and seek to support businesses and housing that will affirm the quality & value that the 76092 zip code has. I have reviewed the proposed Resort Rehab project and think that its location would be ideal for that type of business in that area. With the ease of access on/off 114 and the proximity to Baylor, Forest Park and the city center of Southlake, it is a good location and will provide Southlake with a unique amenity that is not readily available in this area. I am unable to attend the city council meeting next week but ask that you hear my support of this project and support it as well. Thank you, Cheryl Staley Senior Vice President Briggs Freeman Sotheby's International Realty Mobile:817.939.7131 haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&ttF 1529ea6bc6c351d9&sim1=1529ea6tx:6c351d9 1/2 Opposed Outside 200 ft. 2/2/2016 Ci.southtake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:Mainstreet-opposition C YCF �niLAKE Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> • Fwd: Mainstreet - opposition 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:08 AM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: Scott Satcher Date: February 2, 20 a : . To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Mainstreet Ms. Mayor and members of City Council: First off I would like to express my opposition to the latest Mainstreet proposal at the intersection of Shady Lane and 114 feeder. Secondly I would like to express my confusion on how a project that was voted down 7 to 0 by this council was allowed to so quickly resubmit a proposal, bypassing the P&Z process all together. This is especially confusing after the Mainstreet representatives were told directly by Ms. Mayor that if a vote occurred and it was voted down, which it did, that they would have to start the process from the very beginning. Apparently this is not the case. Additionally I have learned that the 2030 land use plan and zoning ordinances, which the city is supposed to hold all developments to as a standard, suddenly are null and void as it pertains to this property. My understanding is that this property was platted in 2003 and despite the current ordinances those can be bypassed and the rules and regulations of 2003 are now in play. Lastly I would like to express my view that this facility will be a logistical and safety concern for all parties involved. Compared to all other building/businesses in this area, this will be a 24/7 type building which is contrary to all other buildings located along this feeder. Since completing the DFW/Grapevine corridor project, traffic on this portion 114 feeder has greatly increased along with their speed of travel. Placing this facility at this location not only creates a safety concern for 114 travelers, but also the future employees, patient visitors, deliveries, ambulances and carry out vehicles that this type of facility demands. Thank you for your time, Scott Satcher 2725 Raintree Southlake TX 76092 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&searchFinbox&th=152a25080acsl2aec&sim1=152a25080ac42aec 1/1 ' 2/1/2016 Ci.sout lake.bc.us Mail-FW:ZA15-072-The Revised Mainstreet Rehab Facility OSOUTHLAKE Holl y Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> • FW: ZA15-072-The Revised Mainstreet Rehab Facility 1 message • Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake:tx.us> Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:43 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Raquel Rosenthal [mail Sent: Monday, February 01, 201 : To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: ZA15-072-The Revised Mainstreet Rehab Facility Dear Madam Mayor and Council Members: The revised building and parking lot that was submitted still remain too large for the property. The revised building footprint and parking lot destroy more native trees by using the old tree preservation ordinance. The tree preservation ordinance should preserve trees not destroy them. In addition, the revised entry that is shared with Next Century Dental is not safe due to its location. A large Rehab facility that operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with three shifts of staff, does not fit the quite nature of our residential neighborhood. Please vote against ZA15-072. Respectfully, Raquel Rosenthal and Brian Jetty 2750 Raintree Drive Southiake, TX 76092 haps://mail.google.com/mail/u!0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1529e2532b3208b2&sim1=1529e2532b3208b2 1/1 1/29/2016 Ci.southlake.bc.us Mail-Fwd:The Intent of the Council vs"The Compromise"model of ZA15-072 oF OSOJnILAKE Holly Blake Fwd: The Intent of the Council vs "The Compromise" model of ZA15-072 1 message Lori Payne<Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fri, Jan 29, 2016•at 7:33 AM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: Carol Dowd Date: January 29, a : : To: mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us, Southlake<placel@ci.southlake.tx.us>, place2@ci.southlake.tx.us, place3@ci.southlake.tx.us, place4@ci.southlake.tx.us, Places <place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>, place6@ci.southlake.tx.us, dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: The Intent of the Council vs"The Compromise" model of ZA15-072 Dear Madame Mayor and Council Members, The Shady Lane Neighbors understood by re-watching the video of the Council meeting that the Mainstreet development might be in compliance of all ordinances if the West wing of the building was removed. Mr. Alexander of Mainstreet said that the West wing held 30 beds and Mr. Fawks did the math to arrive at 70 beds total. Our understanding was that by removing the footprint of the West wing, more trees would be preserved and the driveway stacking variance would disappear. The"Compromise" model as we learned at the meeting with Dr. Bonola on 1/27/16, was that 16 feet was shaved off both the East and West wings and there are now 86 beds, as well as using the old, more onerous 585B tree ordinance. Please realize that the"Compromise" model destroys even more trees than the previous model as well as adds a very unsafe driveway.. The reduction of beds to 86, a number between 70 and 102, is irrelevant to the ordinances and the intent of Council to preserve more trees. The"Compromise" model still has the West wing on top of the biggest tree concentration and made the driveway safety worse by removing one driveway. The existing Bonola driveway, which is now the"Compromise" model sole driveway, was built before the reconstruction and https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1528d9711b15a5b7&sim1=1528d9711b15a5b7 1/2 ' 1/29/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:The Intent of the Council vs"The Compromise"model ofZA15-072 increased traffic.and complexity of the westbound access road. The "Compromise" model at 66,333SF is not significantly different from the 69,571SF of the previous building and still does not fit the character of the Shady Lane Neighborhood.. In conclusion, the"Compromise" model does not serve the intent of the Council, nor does it significantly reduce the concerns of the Shady Lane Neighborhood. Please vote against ZA15-072. Respectfully, Carol Dowd 11111ce haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&searctpinbox&th=1528d9711b15a5b7&sim1=1528d9711b15a5b7 2/2 2/1/2016 Ci.southlake.bc.us Mail-Fwd:ZA15-072 Eircrry o �"�. . Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: ZA15-072 1 message • Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:42 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: Carol Dowd Date: January 31, a : . To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject:ZA15-072 Dear Madame Mayor and Council Members, The citizens in opposition to the revised ZA15-072 have no intent to deny anyone access to this piece of property. A fully compliant driveway can be placed at the TxDOT approved location. A building or buildings, can be arranged on the property in such a manner as to meet the Driveway Stacking Ordinance. Respectfully, Carol Dowd 2900 Hillcastle Ln. Southlake, TX 817-481-0083 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&seardpinbox&th=1529ab5558d0557e&sim1=1529ab5558d0557e 1/1 2/1/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:ZA15-072 Mainstreet proposal QF � - Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: ZA15-072 Mainstreet proposal 1 message Lori Payne<Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:02 PM TO: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: David Dow Date: January 29, a To: "dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us" <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: "mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Fwd:ZA15-072 Mainstreet proposal Dennis. After checking Bonola's plat it appears that the driveway is indeed 25 ft wide. Why again is it not needed to be 30 foot commercial rated?? Thanks. David Dowd Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: DAVID DOWD Date:January 29, 201 a . To: "dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us" <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject:ZA15-072 Mainstreet proposal Reply-To: DAVID DOWD Dennis,I thought I would try the email system.The new revised application was presented to local residents last Tuesday night in a room above council chambers.The plan shows only one driveway proposed,and is shared with Bonola's dental office. I have looked at the Texas DOT requirements for driveways onto state highways.Listed in the"Roadway Design Manual"and in appendix"C"of same,Dated Oct 2014. I find that a driveway used by service vehicles such as food delivery trucks,Oxygen delivery trucks,solid waste collection trucks and laundry delivery trucks along with general auto traffic would be called a Delivery Driveway,or at least a Commercial driveway. That being said a Commercial two-way driveway with one entry lane and one exit lane,4 or more SU vehicles per day, would require a throat width of 30 feet. The driveway depicted on the plan is 24.65 feet. What am I missing? Thanks for your time on helping me understand. David Dowd 214-236-3077 httpsJ/mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&searctFinbox&th=15290e95e8daca68&sim1=15290e95e8daca68 1/1 ' 2/1/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:ZA15-72 Mainstreet 5'CITYt SOIJriiLAKEHolly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: ZA15-72 Mainstreet 1 message Lori Payne<Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> • Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 8:39 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: DAVID DOWD Date: January 30, 201 a : . To: "mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject:ZA15 72 Mainstreet Reply To: DAVID DOWD Madame Mayor and City Council members: I am writing to you to address a few comments in the newly released staff report for the Feb 2,2016 City Council meeting. Public Works Review General Comments item 2 located in (Attachment F Page 5) Sentence(5) "the fact that SH114 westbound frontage road adjacent to the proposed facility is currently striped with a shoulder that is available for the restriping of a deceleration and or acceleration lane if warranted,I find no reason to require the preparation of a Traffic impact Analysis in conjunction with the proposed Main Street Transitional Center development"(Om Chhetri P.E.,CFM) This comment could be viewed as being short sighted. I will give another view. 1. Striping for an acceleration lane will not protect the departing commercial truck which will penetrate into the normal travel lane on departure. It could help with auto traffic,if they chose to stay in that marked lane till reaching merging speed.This could conflict with the decelerating traffic for Shady Ln.which is using this same shoulder for that purpose now. 2.TXDOT did not build a 3 lane road,if at some time they were not planning for that third lane to be used, 5 year,10 year?? Look at SH1709. If you allow striping of the shoulder,and call it an acceleration lane,and then DOT needs the lane,you will be in the same position then as you are now. Except a constructed 66k ft.building will be demanding a new driveway that will still not meet the ordinances. 3.On the east side of this property a deceleration lane was installed. It was in addition to this"quote" shoulder. It did not destroy this"shoulder"lane. Thank you for your time taken to read and understand my concerns. Regards David Dowd 2900 Hillcastle Ln Southlake,TX 76092 214-326-3077 httpsJ/mail.google.com/mail/u/Vui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&searctFinbox&ttF152958ce466e1d04&sim1=152!58ce466e1d04 1/1 2/1/2016 Ci.southlake.bc.us Mail-Fwd:Communication glory Cv SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Communication 1 message - Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> • Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 8:39 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: DAVID DOWD Date: January 30, 201 a : . To: "mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Communication Reply-To: DAVID DOWD Should I be using an additional e-mail address that would allow my comments to be placed in your Council Meeting Packets? David Dowd 2900 Hillcastle LN Southlake,TX https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&th=152958ce9r255dba&sim1=152958ce9P255dba 1/1 • 2/1/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:correction on visibility distance • OS0uI1ILAKE Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> • • • Fwd: correction on visibility distance 1 message • Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 1:49 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us • Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: DAVID DOWD Date: January 30, 201 a . . To: "mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: correction on visibility distance Reply-To: DAVID DOWD I went out again and attempted to ascertain the correct distance of view on the SH 114 access rd.This time it was really close to the 359.8 stopping distance.. That makes it 35 further than I stated on the memo. I am trying to be as honest as I can. This is still less than half of the required distance. David Dowd https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&searct�inbox&th=152941548c05da4b&sim1=152941548c05da4b 1/1 2/1/2016 Ci.souttdake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:ZA15-072 Mainstreet proposal(last e-mail) gigno� f'Q.1 Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: ZA15-072 Mainstreet proposal (last e-mail) 1 message Lori Payne<Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:25 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: DAVID DOWD Date: January 31, 201 a . . To: "mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject:ZA15-072 Mainstreet proposal (last e-mail) Reply To: DAVID DOWD Madame Mayor and City Council members: If I had any idea of the Council's position on the revised application I would not waste,your or my, time trying to add information. Uniqueness of this piece of property and uniqueness of this particular transitional care usage make the fit questionable. The proposed use of the building is for 86 possibly bed ridden patients that are unable to fend for them selves. The property is bordered on the west with a retention pond and to the north by a unimproved dirt driveway, that when wet will not support a fire truck. Access,in an emergency,will be limited to the east and south. The north and west could be unusable. Emergency access needed could be caused by fire, aircraft accident,(DFW proximity),weather related(tornado),or explosion. In any reason for evacuation, help to each patient will be required. Emergency equipment could try to use the shoulder lane(against traffic)for access..This would be the quickest direction from any of our fire stations. We have all seen emergency vehicles using a shoulder,against traffic,sometime in our travels,that were trying to access a accident or fire. If you allow the shoulder to be an acceleration lane and traffic is using it,emergency access to the south would be eliminated. Response could only arrive from the east. This particular building does not fit this particular lot. There are too many safety issues and constraints associated with accessibility. David Dowd htttu://mail.google.com/mail/u/Onui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&searcirinbox&ttF15298eeaa29801e2&sim1=15298eeaa29801e2 1/2 • 2/1/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:ZA15-072 Mainstreet proposal(last e-mail) 2900 Hillcastle Ln. Southlake,TX • • • haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search~inbox&th=15298eeaa29801p2Rsim1=15298eeaa29801e2 2/2 Dear Madame Mayor and Council Members, January 29,2016 ZA15-072 I will thank you in advance for reading this email. I have met with Dr._Bonola and the Mainstreet representatives the evening of Jan. 26,2016 in a training room at City Hall. Information was dispensed and questions and answers were given. We were told that the revised application would only have one shared driveway with Dr. Bonola's dental office. In the previous applications,the City Staff Report stated in Public Works Review, General Comments item 5,Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines. These guidelines are duplicated by TXDOT guidelines for driveways. I expected that someone in city staff would review the shared driveway for compliance with TXDOT requirements. Now in the new staff report, I find that the requirement no longer exists because there is no new driveway. In my opinion, the existing driveway does not meet the Sight Distance guidelines as required by TXDOT. I am asking you,The City of Southlake,to verify that the existing driveway meets the TXDOT requirements, before taking a vote on the ZA15-072 application. I think the driveway is out of compliance, by having less than(one half)of the required sight distance. A quick check by staff could verify this. An alternative would be to delay a vote till verification is complete. I have brought this, information and concern,to Dennis Killough and the City's Public Works division today. TXDOT requirements In "Driveway Design Principles" General Guidelines "The following guidelines apply to all driveways to a state highway". #1 "The driveway placement should be such that drivers approaching from the main roadway will have sufficient sight distance to ascertain the driveway's location in order to safely decelerate and complete the entry maneuver.Also,the driveway placement should be such that an exiting driver will have sufficient sight distance to judge a safe gap in oncoming traffic." "Decision Sight Distance is the distance required for a driver to detect an unexpected or otherwise difficult-to-perceive information source, recognize the source,select an appropriate speed and path, to initiate and complete the required maneuver safely and efficiently. Because decision sight distance gives drivers additional margin for error and affords them sufficient length to maneuver their vehicles at the same or reduced speed rather than to just stop, its values are substantially greater than stopping sight distances. Table 2-2 shows recommended decision sight distance values for various avoidance maneuvers." TXDOT"Roadway Design Manual" Page 2-8 table 2-2 Decision Sight Distance Values,Decision sight distance (ft.)Avoidance maneuver: Avoidance Maneuver B: Stop on urban road=800 feet at 45mph. • Avoidance Maneuver D:Speed/path/direction change on suburban road=800 feet at 45mph. Stopping distance after sighting obstacle is 359.8 feet from 45mph. The measured sight distance on SH114 from the applicant's driveway at 3.5 foot elevation to 3.5 foot elevation looking East is 325 feet. Best as I can measure without getting run over. Conclusion If a driver departs the driveway westbound just as another driver gains a visual clue heading west,the 45mph car would not have enough room to do an emergency stop let alone do any maneuvering. Cars doing 45mph would not have time to turn into the driveway safely and departing driveway traffic could not pick a gap as the second car in the gap would be unseen till cresting the hill. This is 4 seconds,from visual clue till passing driveway. Ambulances leaving the facility with a critical patient with flashing lights will be unseen till after they commit to departing the driveway and risk being overtaken by high speed traffic. This is the same driveway that will be "accessed to and departed from"with service and oxygen trucks. These trucks, out of necessity will accelerate at a slower speed. Additional speed and inattention,for whatever reason,will make the matter worse. Departing traffic trying, unlawfully,to get on the SH114 on ramp will have three chances to get run over. When first made, this driveway extended South to the original SH114 and may not have had to contend with the hill when approved. The access road has evolved over the years from nonexistent to a high speed 3 lane highway. A two lane off ramp,an on ramp, increased speed limits, all traffic from Austin Oaks, and great numbers of Northwest Grapevine residents using SH114 have all made dynamic changes that affect the pre-existing but now unsafe driveway. I have submitted a 1 minute, digital video to council and staff through the City Secretary showing the traffic, as viewed from applicant's driveway. Its time 4:45pm,the time of a shift change as given by Chris Alexander,the applicant. This clip will be shown at council meeting February 2, 2016, if allowed. I implore you to investigate this claim before a vote. Some of you take the time,this weekend to sit in your car at the applicant's driveway and SH114 and look east. Look for the Gap. Don't go before 9am as you won't be able to see any traffic because of the Sun. Be as careful as you can when leaving the location. Regards David Dowd 2900 Hillcastle Ln,Southlake 214-236-3077 1/25/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:ZA15-072 Post Acute Care Facility aryOe SOUTHLAKE Holly Blake <hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: ZA15-072 Post Acute Care Facility 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:32 PM To: mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us • Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: "Ximena Peryea" Date: January 23, 2016 a 111111111111 To: <mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: <place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>, <place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>, <place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>, <place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>, <place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>, <place6@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject:ZA15-072 Post Acute Care Facility Dear Mayor Hill, I always think it is best to communicate directly with those that are best informed and in this case it is you and our Council Representatives. The issue concerns Mainstreet Rehabilitation Development that came before a vote on January 5, 2016 and was unanimously DENIED 7-0; The Main Street representative clearly stated that they could not budge on the economics or building scale and that none of the options presented were viable. We have received a perplexing call from Dr. Bonola's office inviting us to an informal meet and greet, a "Q &A" for neighbors and representatives of Mainstreet Developers on the 26th of January Town Hall 3rd Floor. Is there a mechanism for a project that the City has denied approval to bypass starting the process from the start? Has there been a recommendation from the City of Southlake for us, the citizens, to meet with Mainstreet Development and if so, for what purpose? We have not received any communication from City officials explaining the matter or asking us to meet with the developers. Is it possible that Mainstreet Rehabilitation has petitioned an exception with regards to City protocol? It was stated very clearly that they could indefinitely table the item or request a vote. It was also stated clearly that if the vote failed they would have to start the process from the start. We are beyond these informal meet and greet sessions. Please advise,us how to proceed. httpsJ/mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=i nbcodth=1527179d9a733ed5&sim1=1527179d9a733ed5 1/2 1/25/2016 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd:ZA15-072 Post Acute Care Facility Sincerely, Ximena & Martin Peryea 2820 Rainforest Court haps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=cc737a625d&view=pt&search=inbox&ttp1527179d9a733ed5&sim1=1527179d9a733ed5 2/2 Response Foran /---- Notification 2 /, Meeting Date:February 2,2016 at 6:30 PM PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL,FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s)of the property so noted above,are hereby .in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: UJ t, hire at 1O ItOctShotdtLane,auk,(inure&a1 is kkJ faarnd ;111e liplAA )1Gt1mn 'AR hnv1 )&whorl alta n ont+ ' n6 A A.1f (AH/ ' g/1. kt ah-et `0 ICto p AVM .Anal(R')CieigA (61-U°UM-Oa.Liad ci/rZt 40 Wu piwpo ti) Signature: lin �+jg,pDO Date: 13'1, Additional Signature: o, Date: /-3il-IC Printed Name(s):)'1'),chP.l leaner-1- U Se na-- Must be pmpe ty owner(s)whose nente(s)are printed at top.Otherwise contact the Planning Deaartmeent.One tom oet nropah • Forwarded message From: "Lori Payne" <lpayne(a�ci.southlake.tx.us> Date: Feb 2, 2016 4:10 PM Subject: FW: Opposed ZA15-072: Mainstreet Rehab- SAY NO, Please! To: "Laura Hill" <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: "Ken Baker" <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, "Holly Blake" <hblakec ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Stephanie Basinger [mailto Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 4:07 PM To: mavorandcitycouncil©ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Opposed ZA15-072: Mainstreet Rehab -SAY NO, Please! Dear Mayor and Council Members, We hope you will support us again in saying NO to the Mainstream Rehab/Shady Lane Transitional Care Physicality. Shady Lane Transitional Care creates concerns for the neighborhood and property values: Ambulance Traffic&Sirens Guest Traffic Parking Spaces 76 (102 Bed Residents/80 to 100 Employees) Visitors (Spouses,family&friends) - 2 visitors per day per resident= 204 per day....even half would be 102 visitors+ 100 employees= 202 parking needed and 76 provided. Baylor Dallas Rehab, has a hush parking lot, however visitors are parked up and down the street. Tree Preservation - Landscape= 19% preservation Now 30% **City Ordinance 50% required—says they will plant the 50% back—will these be equal size trees? Impact on Property Values -this is a residential neighborhood,a 70,000 square foot building that operates 24/7 does not fit and will certainly negatively impact our family oriented cherished neighborhood as well as our values! Stacking Variance—75 feet is required,they are providing 28-WHY is no turn lane required? Kimball is already busy, this sounds like a recipe for disaster. We hope as a citizen of this community you will stand for the community and vote NO to Shady Lane Rehab ZA 15-072 and help save our wonderful family neighborhood! • Thank you for your time and consideration! Most Sincerely, Stephanie & Larry Basinger Shady Lane Neighborhood Residents 2869 Rainforest Court M: 214-205-8330 Inspire - Encourage - Believe in Miracles! This e-mail and any attachments are proprietary and confidential information and intended only for the use of the recipient(s)named above. If you are not the intended recipient,you may not print,distribute,or copy this message or any attachments. If you have received this communication in error,please notify us by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. -7'1' I=MMIIIIIII MIN 111 r um 111111111111-0 • �� j1110-i.-4-1 esu '�' ... F < tf `TMk �* rte FT ' '', __ . _ _ -4‘ ,' _-_____--_ ...„..,...:_ii„ I .,„, L,,-,::::, il :.-1 -, - ..„,...„._,.L...„...„..,...._....._._ tf?-4 ,,i...f-,,,:i:Ii!:Zil . / •k illiiiiiimme 2-, si...L. SPO# Owner Zoning Address Acreage Respons e 1. BONOLA FAMILY LTD PRTNSHP C3 2540 E STATE 114 HWY 1.15 F 2. BONOLA FAMILY LTD PRTNSHP C3 2540 E STATE 114 HWY 5.64 F 3. MLCFC 2007-9 SOUTHLAKE RETAIL SP1 2370E STATE 114 HWY 1.45 NR 4. BONOLA FAMILY LTD PRTNSHP C3 2600 E STATE 114 HWY 1.25 F 5. CHAMATHIL,VARGHESE SF1-A 328 SHADY LN 1.44 F 6. BRADFORD,TIM D SF1-A 405 SHADY LN 2.08 NR 7. ABSHER, KAY BLANKENSHIP SF1-A 410 SHADY LN 1.69 0 8. CLARY,RICHARD E SF1-A 415 SHADY LN 1.88 0 9. MERTZ,JAMES N (CRANE,Dr. Mary Elizabeth,beneficial property owner) AG 409 SHADY LN 8.66 F 10. LANCE,CAROL ANN AG 413 SHADY LN 2.85 U 11. Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR 12. Superintendent of Grapevine Colleyville ISD NR 13. Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR 14. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR Responses: F: In Favor 0: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Eight(8) Responses: In favor: 5 Opposed: 2 Undecided: 1 Case No. Attachment F ZA15-072 Page 11 5500 Democracy Drive Suite 125 Plano,TX 75024 t 972 514 7641 ATLANTA LOS ANGELES NEW CHICAGO NEW YORK DALLAS GreenbergFarrow COLUMBUS LLE PHRnDELSNw N ,IS SHANGHAI MEXICO CITY February 1,2016 Ms.Patty Moos Planner 1 City of Southlake Planning&Development Services Re: Mainstreet Southlake-Case#ZA15-072 2540 E.State Highway 114 Proposed Development-Site Plan Project Narrative Dear Ms.Moos: We are submitting this Project Narrative for the subject property located approximately one(1)mile from Baylor Reginal Medical Center in an area that we believe is a recognizable medical corridor along Northwest Parkway in Grapevine and Southlake,located along west bound access road of S.H.114 and Shady Lane.The property is zoned C-3 Commercial,which includes medical care facilities,nursing homes and care homes as permitted land uses by right.The proposed use by Mainstreet is Transitional Care,also known as Post-Acute Care. The healthcare landscape is rapidly changing,with an intense focus on efficiency,lower cost and better outcomes for consumers.The Transitional Care to be provided at this location will be short-stay therapy for its guest who will rehabilitate until they are ready to transition to their homes.A typical guest will stay for an average of thirty(30)days.After hospital interventions and surgeries such as cardiac events,strokes,or hip/knee replacements,our property offers a transitional platform for these patients with an array of physical rehabilitation needs.As healthcare expenditures rise there is an increasing focus by patients,providers and policymakers on restraining unnecessary resource utilization such as that incurred by preventable re-hospitalization.Transitional Care Centers are an important component in significantly reducing readmits. Since our previous submittal,Mainstreet has gone to great lengths to design a site that will meet all of the City's codes and requirements with regard to landscape,tree preservation,building size and access.Below is an explanation of the changes made not only to the site,but to the building in addition,to our attempt to address the concerns as expressed by City Council. Building changes: Mainstreet understands the City Council's stated concern about the size of the building in relation to the size of the property. To address this concern,Mainstreet is committing to shrink the building footprint by reducing the length of the building by slightly over 30'and by committing to a bed count reduction from 102 beds to 88 beds. The total square footage of the building has been reduced from the original 69,511 sf to 66,333 sf. The first floor footprint of the building is now 42, 808 sf. Site plan changes: The Mainstreet team has made further adjustments to the site plan by removing the western drive and dropping its request for a variance from the the required 75 ft stacking requirement.All access to the site will now be at the east end of the site via the shared drive with Next Century Dental,located at 2680 E.State Highway 114.One_access point that leads across the front of the building to the main entrance sits almost 98'from the Right of Way.The other is at the northeast corner of the site,just over 326'from the Right of Way line that leads to the service areas and staff parking at the back of the building.On-site parking has been reduced from 98 spaces to 70 spaces total.Cross access with Next Century Dental will allow for use of their east drive as a second point of ingress/egress to allow any traffic wanting to access the Hwy 114 west bound on ramp. MS-Southlake TX Project Narrative(Rev.3 2015.1-18) Tree Preservation/Mitigation: Since January 5,2016 City Council meeting it was discovered that;since the site was platted in 2004 and prior to adoption of the current tree preservation ordinance 585-D,the site should be reviewed under Ordinance 585-B.It is our understanding that this ordinance allows for the removal of the trees necessary for building pad,driveways,and associated parking.We also understand that any trees to be removed will be evaluated by the City's Landscape Administrator and a determination made in regard to the mitigation required. Mainstreet has made a good faith effort to preserve valuable trees on a site that contains many undergrowth trees and brush that should not be considered for preservation.Some of the changes made in an attempt to limit the number of trees that will need to be removed are;reduced the length of the building by 30'which has allowed us to reduce the paved area of the site as well,and thus reducing the original number of planned parking spaces.The site has been shifted 10'to the west in effort to save some of the older growth trees at the east end of the building,and remove some of the smaller undergrowth trees in the center of the site. By removing the westem drive we are able to redesign the grading along the southern of the site.This will allow us to save additional trees along the site frontage. At the urging of the City's Landscape Administrator there has been the addition of a retaining wall along the north drive that has alleviated the slope along the north property line and therefore enabled additional tree preservation. The current design preserves a total of 1,322 caliper inches and 111 inches being mitigated on site for non-exempt trees being removed. Grading and Drainage: By changing the building footprint,we are able to grade the site in a manner that reduces the disturbance on the west end of the site leaving more of the natural area.We have removed the berm along the west curb line and decreased the surface area of the pond.We intend to increase the depth of the pond in an effort to maintain a"wet pond"during dryer seasons.This will also allow more area on the site for tree mitigation around the retention pond. We respectfully request review and approval of the Site Plan submittal for the proposed development by Mainstreet.The development will enhance the corridor and add an exceptional and needed service to the City of Southlake. Regards, Marley Phillips MS-Southlake D(Project Narrative(Rev.3 2015-1-18) SreenbergFarrew o,,_._�A. a'CEDAR WOO. SCREENING FENCE I !F - 5500 Democracy Dr.Suite 125 8'CEDAR WOO. _- DEPOSED 20' ' SCREENING FENCE • ' "'- IN4p.GGE/• - - j PROPS?A ,,/ SANNARY'E &r - , �, - ,_ _-, _ JECT TEAM 0 —.p �',x X x .---X —:..:,W-----x'---W._x---x --'x — x a ., --_1-±________.!_!!! ----- d . Y : .N.•_•,:(% PRO �y Plano,Y C 972 514 7641 x x if •. . - . _ .— ._ I -- _.. —_—.. ._'•_'— SCREENING FENCESITE - $-$'-CEOM-WBS' i t ACfE.SSEASEENf= 111111111111M ---- � - --_ - • l rOL�I. ^G• — - — - —�=` — 4-t• — _ t _ — :�E lrtr � — SeNITABY EASFIdE L ...• t/ ,<./�q�•.n � •' A� ` ../ „ /. 1 N , J�'I'.l2�J.,, i 1�i a. a • - e ir • a,.,11.. , �.• ISANITARY A GRNNAGE EASEMENT 1 I / cr. m 4C'BUILDING SETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAL 1 L _ I. j r u , YS CD �c'IA 11'. ® MAINSTREET AND ADJACENT PROPERTY f ....o i:- © ME \ OWNER TO ESTABLISH EASEMENT FOR ' 1, - E 532 CED'' i� _,j CONTINUATION OF PRIVATE SHARED SITE LOCATION MAP m.°rq«q�RHS 1"NOTICE prop.; A� ACCESS DRIVE. references,a,m'...,°,o and +Nused ` -� --1-525-5- '' 3.9s N.T.S. the a q;� ' w Fra IP I ]V.ED project ana site nomeirl herein.aria cannot he reproduced in any menner without the �. = 4'WIDE SHARED ACCESS ERM: ISSUFJREVISIOM RECORD ' DESCRIPTOR D,,.h P. - $ *;3Lx ::r — y• TO BE EXTENDED TO THE NORTH Dab-4s-1s SplOu,nc RAIN I BUILDING AREA i 4)• I :As,A SLOE NAW r, N01,, 9'W OB-1-15 97E RAN REV9W - 42,808 SF(FIRST FLOOR) © -r .91' 0ES-25-15 CITY COMYENiS IEN901 + 'e •' _.IXISTING_DRNYeGE EASEMENT BOUNDARY __ __ __ - 4 FISTING DRAINnGE�I.SEIIENT-1L)UNDABY A 2„.4x,2 4; 23,525 SF(SECOND FLOOR) ' 09-08-15 91E RAN REVISOR UI: ti, 10 / TO BE ABANDONED I •BE ABANDONED •26.E DN'ST TOTAL=66,333 SF __ 1D-14-15 91E PLAN ROOM CM I I _ v ® r I I 0...5, TRANSITIONAL CARE CENTER + 'LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10-21-15 91E RAN ReAsw I .rases / ED� :Y4 raeiueRLswr F.F.E=824.00 v 'x I I Ir BOUNDARY OF PROPOS ;;.CA yy.J�p.ay,Ey 10-26-15 91E PLAN REASON DRAINAGE EASEMENT y 12-11-15 SITE RAN PEN9011 uPR-G7 ❑�`p� m-19-16 91E RAN REMO ' 1 I I / I . ® CD oil532 _`�± ��7I�Il: v • ® - , Oi-25-16 91E RAN TENSION mom--• , `,�,� 1 Pr �J �,e, �mi 02.49' . .. _ W 410" A Ar Gtoz .. ....-S � h' 8 PCC CONCRETE MOLT j'' �i�� � `aar/ /� ..-/r,0®�.-,�� ® © ❑ r $ _-:� RAR tel". — �..� � !- si ' Txoor Raw • `-- ,� �1/q/�/ igi l% Ge OCTANIII III iii „i: H1� ry �.o —_w_ m., — - ►//rte A g -t‘.--> 4� L,a a �, 6 , Agree ._.,.. ..w..oA,r, ' 7„....R.04,.. q„,,.�.�.RSR'. __ A sL91gi --- I ° PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE I FARMAN SHIRMOHAMMADI ._ _ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE NO.91366 -- ___.-- _ B PROJECT MANAGER . -9, h// MARLEY PHILLIPS• . • Q .. '''- QUALM'CONTROL MARLEY PNLJPS BRAWN RT GERARDO NORMS PROJECT NAME PROPOSED LEGEND: GENERAL SITE NOTES ——4 PROPERTY LINE 1. ALL ORE1190N5 SION ARE TO THE FACE CF CUM UNLESS OIIAIRWff NOTED. SITE DATA SUMMARY TOTAL - - EASEMENT UNE 2 ALL CURB RETURN RADII SHALL BE Y,AS DOAN TYPICAL ON THS RAN.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL NIMIIIIIIII PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 3. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN,CAMEO OUT DR SPECIRED HEREON: LAND USE DESIGNATOR C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL -- PROPOSED CURB&GUTTER 4. ALL CURB AND GOER ADJACENT TO CONCRETE PAVNG SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL SHEET 1r. CONSTRUCTION FENCE(SEE DETAIL SHEETS) 6 PAVEMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PAVING PVN OUR THE ENDRE PARKING LOT AREA AND ALL APPROACH SOUTH LAKE GROSS ACREAGE 5.68 CI,. &110 TEXAS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES(SEE oRrvEs. TEXAS• NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS 1 GRADING/DRAINAGE PIANO) G ALL SLOPES AID AREAS DGMBED BY CONSIRIICIIDN SHML BE GRADED S13011/AND FOUR INCHES SF TOPSOIL APPLIED. IF GRAPHIC SCALE ADEQUATE TOPSOIL IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE,111E CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TOPSOIL,APPROVED BY THE GINGER,AS NEEDED. PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE 51% ® THE AREA DULL ® L THEN BE SEEDED/SODDED,FERAL ,MULCHED.WATERED AND NED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH S STATE HIGHWAY 114 PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ESTABLISHED IN ALL N€NS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR INT REASON PRIOR TO RNV ACCEPTANCE OF 111E PROJECT SHALL BE AREA OF OPEN SPACE(ACRES) 2.76 CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT ND ADDTK)HAL COST TO THE ORRER. I &SHADY LANE _ PERCENTAGE OF OPEN SPACE 49% ® PROPOSED INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS 7. CONDUCTOR MIST SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING WOR(. (ON FEET) - BUFFERYARDS B IF THE CONTACTOR IN THE COURSE OF THE WON,RMS ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND THE PHYSICAL CONDITIONS 1 ince= 40 TL AREA OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE(ACRES) 2.92 • - OF THE LOCALITY.OR ANY ERRORS OR OMSSKNS IN M PLATS OR IN THE LAYOUT A5 GIVEN BY THE ENGINEER,T SEAL EE HS CITY TO IMMEDIATELY INFORM THE DNONEER,IN WRING.AND THE ENGINEER RLL PROMPTLY VERIFY THE SUE ANY WORK DONE PERCENTAGE OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 51% I EXISTING EASEMENTS AMER SUCH A DSCO,ERY,IND AUTHORIZED,ARL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RUC ��� 1 PROPOSE BUILDING AREA(S.F) 66,333 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERFIUTON OF ALL SETBACKS,EASDIENS,AND OMDGTONS SHOWN HEREON BEFORE HEMMING CONSTRUCTION. NUMBER OF STORIES 2 SITE KEY NOTES ® ainstreet 10.CALLO CRUCTiO SP WIERWS AID WETIlW4SIDP SHALL BE IN ACLogOVDE TO THE STATE ND LOLL GOVERNMENT AGENCY LATEST MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35 SEA CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STANDARDS. coxSNuciwx sPEdFlGTOGs WIND DETAILS 58.A CONCRETE SIDEWALK(PER LOCAL CODES) 11.ALL ACCESSIBLE SIZE FEATURES SEAL BE(XJGSIRULTFD i0 MEET ALL FEDERAL.STATE WIND LOCAL CODE PARKING INFORMATION: PROPOSED BEDS BES 12 NOW(THE CITY NSPECTOR TWENTY-FOUR(29)HORS BEFORE BEDDING EACH ROSE OF CDN.ONSTR000 REQUIRED PARKING 43 S10 SIDEWALK RAMP 0 8.33%YAx.(TYPICAL-PER LOCAL CODES) MAINSTREET TRANSITIONAL CENTER S12 CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS(SEE NOTE FOR NUMBER) 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHILL CAREFULLY PRESERVE IETDHMNDS.REFERENCE POINTS.NO SINUS. REQUIRED: A T L. 2016 PROVIDED PARKING 71 S15 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE(PER ARCH.PLANS) 14.ARCHITECTURAL RAM ARE TO BE USED FOR BILLING STAKE aur. DESCRIPTION I BEDS TARO SPACES tjt' (! STANDARD 67 516 ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE STRIPING&SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY 15.ALL OAENSDRSONS ARE FROM FACE OF BULGING.DMID WALL UNLESS DTHERW&SPECIFIED ON PIANS. BEDS REGULAR ACCESSIBLE VAN ACCESSIBLE TOTN- PROJECT NUMBER HANDICAP 4 (TYPICAL-PER ADA AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS) 11.CONTRACTOR SOUL MAINTAIN THE STE IN A BANNER SO THAT WORKERS FAD PUBIC SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM INJURY,ANO1 SPAC%BEDS 41 1 1 43 QQ - 017 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN(TYPICAL PER ADA AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS) ADJOINING PNSPEAIT PROTECTED FROM NAGE CARE 86 PLUS 1 SPACE ^- BUILDING SETBACKS 019 " S OP SIGN COMPACTOR IS ESPOSDt FOR DAMAGE TO ANYCOSMO TEM AND/OR MATERIAL INSIDE ORO OUTSIDE CONTRACT WCHRONIC 0E CRACT E TO /4 EMPLOYEES SHEET TITLE FRONT 50' 520 STOP BAR(PER LOCAL CODES) CONSTRUCTION OPFMnox. (50 STAFF) 18 ALL STREET SURFACES.DRVEWAYS,CULVERTS,CURB AND GUTTERS,ROADSIDE DRAINAGE DITCHES AND OTHER STRUCTURES THAT ARE STALL DIMENSIONS: PROVIDED: SDE 30' S22 FIRE LANE STRIPING(PER LOCAL CODES) DISTIDEED ITHE GS ER IN ANY MINA5 A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED OR EMBED IN ACCORDANCE HIM SITE RAIp SPACES SITE PLAN S23 PARKING STALL STRIPING(PER LOCAL CODES) REAR 40' SPACES REGULAR ACCESSIBLE VAN ACCESSIBLE TOTAL 527 FIRE HYDRANT(PER LOCAL CODES) 16 ALL ROAD WONT SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE ICH ME STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY SPECIFICATIONS 67 1 3 71 CASE#ZA15-072 S29 TRANSFORMER PAD LOCATION(SEE URUTY PUN) 20.ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PER MOT MEM. 67 NUMBER 532 LANDSCAPE AREA(PER LANDSCAPE PLAN) 21.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVOING AND MAINTAINING ADEQUATE TRAFFIC CONTROL THROUGHOUT THE 51TE AREA:5.68 ACRES --- PROJECT.INCLUDING PROPER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND/OR PERSONNEL AS REQUIRED. THIS INCLUDES BOTH 080 IX.FIRE HYDRANT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CONTROL. TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH M.U.T.C.D.AND STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION- S90 ENTRANCE 591 DC I I 1 I I • — . _ — X — --- ..—.-_ -.._ I x T. Gre en elf r0w" — X — r-_ — y — X — _ — — X — _ -_. _ _ .----_ — . - = -------.--- _ 5500 Democracy DrSuite 125 .._ - _ _ 7X 75024 _ _ _ _ _ aria,N80"-.4,'17"12 _,4 t9725147841 NINEMIIMIN "Pill __ R •;'- c - - .. - PROJECT TEAM ' -- -- - - - <SAN <SvN Z f - - N .? eameeitiT. _ ._ ——— __.___. ._.__ _ �N' �� lip! — — — J— - - - - - II I $. 1 •� 1e see ���� /V __ WET POND iiii ��r���� `. ( I-7 r_...._ I NLS41/$ • ^y-,} •' j .A.-:,. y:- \/ / ` 11 `. . I COPYRIGHT NOTICE '�R✓ 7 .+; " Y m.,,ow.„.me Pe der m m ewe 532 K , I ( .r a 1 retwe cyarvodone°ono not loves used j ., .., ., A m ore Purpose her than the specific r L a .1e am.manner without e.an e reproduced n a m u t N el Witten P Teri me PrMmnro I ' Asa �� ! - T#� � ', `� ' .ems ( .,y� • ISSUE/IIEVISIOM RECORD ,Sa 1 ". 4 .¢ t"'� �."' 1 'f - ,• E ,I^. 041E DESCRIPTION !Of $ s i.:2,. "' I s� BUILDING AREA8--114-5 9 E PIAN PLAN M .Ag S. 1:':A rt' I I ! 42,808 SF(FIRST FLOOR) r 372.91' 9-9-155 315 RAN REI ON901 N. 17-N01.04'36"W 372.91' 9-9-15 911 PINI REN90N lig/ i 'i' lla _' '"'"` ' 23,525 SF(SECOND FLOOR � to-t6-ls 9TE PUN REV90N f [< TOTAL=66,333 SF ) -t ��,I4� "1 1 11-18-15 UPDATE BREL CALCULATIONS thr e'{@E"y" i 11-18-15 RE`r6ID BLDG FOOIPHIT 4d TRANSITIONAL CARE CENTERYOUT ti I 12-09-15I6 r�TEFD 328E ewer I rn _ I .�., F uJ q-25-16 9E PLAN PETl4D 97EREN N1 I h•l yrN (111//jfiliF.E 624.00 1 -i .. ,.,,. :„ 01-29-1fi 91E PIAN PENSION 7te I i l ; >E ( �f?r/P�L.r,.:. ■II�� �� , I. 11 1i . A I; j •�P , ter.'./' I ,�1�4. I B I _ , �� uLil�um . I $$rr I I ..H 5 539.58 a s'�^ --�; '�4P % ,'/« .' .n! jt y _ �y.4... 6./ 6' 70, 1--11I rt .y e' ,1r, --- _ _ . I. _.:: I I I .....- PROFESSIONAL>t[AL E o -; s°'swl arvco eraAac -rr'-. 11 (AS SHONn ry�RAr� j j '�� GAB ' .- 7. • I I I • G.L JOSEPH VAUGHN �. �. -�„ - E ., /174-/!rr i.e..ill,'re f/•..rr,/4,fi//l//,707e/r/rZir7 / ,ww - LANDSCAPE ARCHrtECT '�•-++. .�� 0Q- (` 1C � LIS 2422 � - �/ FOR CINAPUCTIONOTINTENpED H .-.1, C FOR CONSTRUCTION OR cfi. t -_-___--''''- ROW C-• �u _� ...s- g. �Ii cT`",4-" •dl � � ', � R°" �3! -a. _'$ •. REGULATORY APPROVAL I l ,I a, • 4 x _ - mxrrcre T wE 7 T ;� �;.:.. -I PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE .n.�� a./rw,�� G I JOSEPH VAUONN,RLA -,_._,-.r -.. �_<'p.,'- - .4L } ,.. rT I REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT "'+ z,_ . FA _ _ » LICENSE N0.2422 E j 27.1r. F 0� PROJECT MANAGER IWPS CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE ill- A&EWpTH RU9 T T•- II. ROyy P•-_.,.......____ __,7_____ �E ��.: .. I MARLEY CONTROL -_.�...._. UC RIGHTpF 144•11')---- _""'��'r,} ' QUALITY RI6FFR CANOPY - '_"-,, _.^ ,M !.85 u •:>Iw-1110 Pcer rubrum'October claryTM/October Glory Maple 'w*w. r�1� .. • CdDRAWN IT Quercus muehledii/ h Card Rid Oak S9.13.9716r......___________________:..7-_-"'-'1. °19'1 ' G4N Quercus enumaraF/9numara Red Oak 2 PROJECT NAME Ulmus parvifalia'All.'/Atlee Leeehark Elm --_ _ I MAINSTREET BUFFER MDEN 61 TRANSITIONAL Lagerstroemio coca/Crape Myrtle Magnolia virginiona/Sweet Bay yre 'Aristocrat'TM Aristocrat Flowering Pear Yten agnea-cognoe-caCARE stae/Chaste Tree ._.-.-_-__,--__ ill SOUTHLAKE MmGAnoN TRIF 37 Acer rubrum'October Glory'TM/October Glory Maple TEXAS Liquidambar styrac.fluo/American Sweet Gum SLTGIAAYCILIAT-NIF►ERl'AlIDB Ouercue muehlenbergii/Cninko Oak Quercus snumaraii/Snumord Red Oak Tnxodmm tliatmnam'Autumn Sold /Autumn Gold Bala Cypress W818 �y HIGHWAY 114 AND Ulmue p0,0101°'Atlee'/Atlee Lacebark Elm lig Alm! Ymed fMQ ,e6fM Y11r iotas tedwi mit fuE IuN I� lY�t SHADY LANE - � INTERIOR ACCENT 28 NMI- Aeglired 10'/fl 23 ab 61 Lagersboemio indica/crape Myrtle Magnolia virginian' ie Sweethoe deo 762.5• 19• 2a 515 71 _ SITE TREE COVERAGE CALLS: �7 Pyres calleryvno'Aristocrat't' Bay TM/Aristocrat Flowering Pear 5 . RrprzM S'/A 4 t N !CAL INCH Atex agnus-costus/Chaste Tree heeded 373-? VAGINAE 4b b M TOTAL TREE PRESERVATION 1,322 kWh- Emptied 35'/7 31 13 116 - TOTAL EXEMPT ES REMTREES REMOVED M 853 III TREE TO BE PRESERVED 99 heeded 768.7_' 3T 315 335 928 TOTAL TREESREMOVEDTOBEMTGATED 110 1-` MITIGATION W/ON SITE PUNTING 111 /•I1P��+ T)et_ Sa9lird 10'/C I U 33 'm tregt Peorided 272.1- lo' M 13d 43 ■i-EO• SSeV Is$i 6,, ■ rtrwar.w r rlwl.re - ! PARKING SCREENING HEDGE AS SHOWN ON PUN • m•AAote:_.c,rpvwa5aa ce,5em o Jumper.chinensis'Sea Greer'/Sea Green Juniper It b•AeAen o[emp"rmp.a oAmrerd'A Rhvphiolepis indica'Indian Princess'TM/Indian Princess Indian Hawthorne a W :acr,pymAsa AeaeO ovAe l w��...C'mop,malu.l�Amnaeler JAN ^ ^n -. ORNAMFNTAI REDS AS SHOWN ON PLAN �AfD�o Jii cJ 2o�V TJI RF AS SHOWN ON PLAN SUMMARY R E.1, soon dantylon/Bermuda Gross M �,�,A�� ANS l SOMA I :rNW �r Aa hlM.1CNk list Ills — 1N 1 gee Sepia a AN 73% 46 96 596 3364 475 — 23 SHEET TITLE P.M* 1243!5 7/% 585 lie 598 3.514 I 476 Nang mil animism, OVERALL • lair NCoem aon a loo mews mem 1Sbe,C GRAPHIC SCALE LANDSCAPE PLAN a ,a CASE#ZA15-072 Y•efwlorlaveM.:Amirm•er TMM...,,,rwn 144 k.11.1.1••.10..•NAe*. 06%.1".... 1 rs••N!tutor r•rw ere r tl a rote Ar•rrec SHEET NUMBER 1 coryy Tree 5r,500upve feel (OF LEI) i C,ace Tree e peare r 556 rmer en 1 Inch- 90 SL _ -Swami Color-3,of reps.ace I I I - keen erg rrow MN RCP :,F.I — - rt/2"LIEF COOMBS RPL5529< FL EL=606.50• � X Y — X — X .X Y X ; _ _-_ "' _ _-_ _ - O1!1'/RFJ$OC l�2ft10Cf2CY 7/.JII IP":2cano TX 75024 5/8.'72r Nm.� - -- -_x - '- -11 .. 1• gM1' SASSOCP1972 14 7641fR'CMFLAN0.RAADA- - r, - - s -- - -ERRE - - -'_ -- - - - - K—' 5 __ . PROJECT TEAMc '' „ _ _- 2 __ :._ CAN Si <.S6LV - --1 Win'-= 'HS N <SFP-=<S?.N N��`+�:`N �S?1� —.— l-•.,;SHN SAN— SAN y SBN 3.III r iiir- 6„�_ .sP3uNRca- sro - en' ILL._ S �! cT.EL,6os1a -- ��\A - i _ - °�IP� �'irk �h� �ey��L �,b��� _ /.�t,ur�/s PJI�II�I►�Il� th”1 fh / .e- Ili • bens - - I .�..�.'', ,, ,I, 0yy 61x r ` ��I i 11 ( .0 GRAPHIC SCALE ..,, ., ! L., 1I eta J ._ COPYRIGHT NOTICEu c.„,_ Y `a E - !� �_ ___.. I ;er.a t w'ac m:m m°tea or In._ il , ; BUILDMG AREA 3�v, (nr PSE) °�,y�s°:a•m� N o«�^IX• �_ ;< I e42808SF(FIRSTLOOR). - d / ms+ 1 mon- 4a n ��� °�,m��':,I°��,��m.=i 11 ` ! I °oP,m f�mm"-,:,j _ - M4 _� �r 23.525:a(SEGO FLOOR) �1F� 1_-- ` ...7.,,,,,:„„„,,,,„„..„.,1, .,nom wpm.=° .Pwa,o�` T4"IAL=65;333SISSUE/REVISION gECORO �1 TRANSITIONAL,P',ARE CENTER �I' ! w1E DESCRIPTION '00° tgiillik....1 F.F.E-624.0^ 4. .,.! - szs15 sDEI+Anc PLMen; J+2g5J 1 \ e',� I I SITE TREE COVERAGE CALLS: R-14-15 9h PLAN REN90NSeo - EI`/¢ a ',, CAL.INCH 8-25-15 OTY COeENTS IER901 I 1`'I � - _ I,• ■ .I / TOTAL TREE PRESERVATION 1.722 9-9-15 511E PLAN IEN901 -16-1S 911 PLAN WWI dIU a / '� 11-18-15 RRENSED BLDG TPREITFOD VIIIIIT P I. ye .. .. // _ •II. TOTAL TOTAL EXEMPT TREES REMM BE VF-D GATED 858 LAYOUT IGATION VV/ 110 15 snE 'A�/• 'R-5.8M ESE' Ph‘ �, IrPta •/ / AL TRESRMONDTE PLANTING T pl_1�16 9M1E�RAN REM9Q1 _ L.2077H' &' 0-25-16 SIE PLAN REM9ON �wN { Bj / �a Ill el�, . ;y fi�� —��::-�- ,_ � 0-29-16 91E PLAN REN90N CHL•2T9381�• �� 5 FI Ur_ 1/CE-EM.,ACC. aL �� ®6�' II $ , I Hi Dd cAe `"```\` /111.11.1111 / I B CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE xIIILVTROI CUT •. V ,4Tai _ .. _ .- - �,�i.�l.����„���' '' �,#,i.1-1,,,, ITREE TO BE PRESERVED 416- L t-y newt.dr -. It 1i�� A 1 _ �/ _ _- !_ — TO BE REMOVED-MITCATFD REE ERRE___ / ..'ERRE _ _ F/47/XOOTB••-- a..+...w. ERRE rz,�a� �� •/ AIONIAIENT cr‘ iL J _ --8:• •• fu / g I II TREE TO BE REMOVED-EXEMPT 1 a ., MONUMENT FM)TXOOi'�u __y �' �- _ l../ - N .n� mss.'' PROFESSIONAL SEAL -ri•� r ara SEER � ���` JJAl +N ];)IA- .�V .L • / I J ,.A1 , G.I.JOSEPH VAUGHN LANDSCAPE ARCHRECT • -_•� ■Y 6 I LIS:2922 ,EST �, = RD?XOOr x• LYIrROCUT - "' / ENDEO L, PRELIMINARY PUN NOTINT FOR CONSTRUCTION OR i S • / REGULATORY APPROVAL TREE SURVEY SUMMARY 48 WId0ERRY 10 I PRESERVE 101 ELM 6 MITIGATE 154 ELM L REMOVE 219 ELM 6 REMOVE I ERRE_._ ERRE-. _ __ _ __., SEER - ..--_ _ ERRE ERRE 19 ELM 6 (PRESERVE 102 FLM 6 MITIGATE 3% EW REMOVE 220 PECAN 6 REMOVE PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE I 50 OAK 20 (PRESERVE 103 ELM 24 REMOVE 156 ELM REMOVE 221 ELM 8 REMOVE G I JOSEPH VAUGHN,RLA 8 I TYPE OBH COMMENTS 51 EIM 10 PRESERVE 104 HELM 26 REMOVE 157 ELM : :REMOVE 222 ELM 6 REMOVE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT .. - _ ERRE _____________—__ 1 OAK 20 PRESERVE 52 kit:kiIky 6 !PRESERVE 105 !ELM 20 REMOVE 158 ELM :REMOVE 223 ELM 6 REMOVE LICENSE NO.2422 • 2 ELM 8 PRESERVE 53 ELM 12 PRESERVE 106 ELM 26 PRESERVE 159 ELM • 'REMOVE 224 HACKBERRY 6 REMOVE PROJECT INANASRN • • 3 ELM B PRESERVE 54 OAK 6PRESERVE 107 HELM 8 PRESERVE 160 ELM REMOVE 225 ELM 6 REMOVE PlEWES 4 ELM 6 PRESERVE 55 OAK 8 PRESERVE 108 ',OAK 6 PRESERVE 161 ELM .MITIGATE 276 ELM 6 REMOVE OUALRV CONTROL 5 ELM a PRESERVE 56 OAK 12 PRESERVE 109 !ELM 12 PRESERVE 162 ELM 12 'MITIGATE 227 ELM 6 REMOVE 6 ELM 8 PRESERVE 57 HACKBERRY 6 !PRESERVE 111 HAOOlERRY 8 PRESERVE 163 ELM 8 PRESERVE 227 ELM 6 REMOVE ERA111N ST ERRS_. .RESER_.. ......___ _......._... ....._._._. ERRS_. ......_.. 7 ELM 6 PRESERVE 58 ELM 10 PRESERVE 112 (OAK t PRESERVE 164 ELM 6 REMOVE 229 EEM 6 REMOVE GUY limilmem 8 'ELM 12 PRESERVE 59 ELM 8 !PRESERVE 113 !OAK 6 PRESERVE 165 (ELM 6 REMOVE 230 ELM 8 REMOVE PROJECT NAME . 9 (ELM 16 PRESERVE 60 ELM 10 (PRESERVE 114 OAR - 6 PRESERVE 166 (ELM i 6 ,PRESERVE 231 WA 6.._MITIGATE MAINSTREET 10 OAK 24 PRESERVE 61 ELM 10 PRESERVE 115 CEDAR 8 PRESERVE 167 ELM • 6 -REMOVE 232 CEDAR 8 REMOVE 11 OAK 24 PRESERVE 62 ELM 6 !PRESERVE 116 ELM 10 MITIGATE 168 ELM 3 .REMOVE 233 ELM 8 MITIGATE TRANSITIONAL 12 OAK 24 PRESERVE 63 ELM ERRE_ 10 _PRESERVE 117 ELM 10 REMOVE 169 ELM 6 REMOVE 234 HACKBERRY 6 REMOVE 13 HACKBERRY 8 PRESERVE 64 ELM 8 PRESERVE 113 ELM i 6 REMOVE 170 ELM 20 'REMOVE 235 PECAN 12 MITIGATE CARE 14 OAK 16 PRESERVE 65 CEDAR 8 PRESERVE 119 ELM I PRESERVE 170 1ELM i 8 'REMOVE 236 HACKBERRV 6 MITIGATE __ 15 ELM 6 PRESERVE 66 CEDAR 6 PRESERVE 120 ELM PRESERVE 171 ELM ' 8 REMOVE 237 ELM 8 REMOVE 16 ELM 20 PRESERVE ERRE ELM E... - 6 _._. i...... IES 67 CEDAR 10 PRESERVE 121 ELM 6 PRESERVE 172 FELM i 3 PRESERVE 238 ELM 6 REMOVE SOUTHLAKE 17 HACKMAN 6 PRESERVE 68 HACKBERRY 6 PRESERVE 122 ELM 12 PRESERVE 173 ELM I 8 PRESERVE 239 PECAN 6 REMOVE TEXAS 16 HACRBERRY 6 PRESERVE 69 HACKBERRY 6 PRESERVE 123 OAK 8 PRESERVE 174 ELM 10 'PRESERVE 240 PECAN 8 REMOVE 19 HACKBERRY 10 PRESERVE 70 HACKBERRY 6 PRESERVE 124 OAK 8 PRESERVE 175 ELM 12 :PRESERVE 241 ELM6 REMOVE HIGHWAY 114 AND _ERRE__.__ ERRESERE_-ERRE._ 20 HACKBERRY 6 PRESERVE 71 ELM 6 PRESERVE 125 OAK 8 PRESERVE 176 CEDAR 32 'REMOVE 242 PECAN 3 REMOVE SHADY LANE 21 ELM 18 PRESERVE 72 PECAN 6 PRESERVE 126 OAK 8 PRESERVE 177 ELM 12 -REMOVE 243 OAK 10 REMOVE 22 ELM 16 PRESERVE 73 ELM 10 PRESERVE 127 ELM 12 REMOVE 178 ELM 10 REMOVE 244 ELM 8 REMOVE 23 NACIOERRY 6 PRESERVE 74 HACKBERRY 16 PRESERVE 128 ELM _6 REMOVE 179 ELM 8 REMOVE 245 PECAN 6 PRESERVE 24 OAK 18 PRESERVE 75 ELM 3 PRESERVE 129 ELM : -6 REMOVE 310 CEDAR REMOVE 246 PECAN B PRESERVE 25 OAK 24 PRESERVE 76 ELM 6 PRESERVE 130 ELM 6 REMOVE 181 CEDAR REMOVE 247 ELM 6 PRESERVE ERRE...ERRE ....... ERRE _. , 26 OAK 32 PRESERVE 77 ELM 12 PRESERVE 131 ELM • 10 REMOVE 182 EWA :REMOVE 248 ElM 6 PRESERVE ,- 27 OAK 14 PRESERVE 78 ELM 8 PRESERVE 132 ELM 10 REMOVE 183 ELM I REMOVE 249 ELM 6 REMOVE EI4 28 OAK 14 PRESERVE 79 ELM 6 PRESERVE 133 ELM 6 REMOVE 114 ELM I :REMOVE 250 PECAN 6 PRESERVE i E .7�'CTl ....___.SEER__... 29 OAK 18 PRESERVE EO ELM 6 PRESERVE 134 OAK 8 REMOVE us HACE3I Y :REMOVE 251 ELM 6 REMOVE 30 OAK 18 PRESERVE Ni HACIOERRY 10 PRESERVE 135 OAK 6 REMOVE 136 ELM REMOVE 253 NAO4FRRY 6 REMOVE 31 OAK 18 PRESERVE 62 ELM 6 PRESERVE 136 ELM 10 REMOVE 201 HACKEEREY :PRESERVE 32 OAK 13 PRESERVE 83 ELM 6 (PRESERVE 137 ELM- jL ( 711.1r4 10 REMOVE 202 OAK M PRESERVE A(�3�! CA ••� 33 HACKBERRY 6 PRESERVE 14 ELM 10 ,REMOVE 138 ELM 10 REMOVE 203 OAK 26 PRESERVE S-A - ELM 14 PRESERVE ES ELM 14 MITIGATE 139 OAK 12 REMOVE 204 ELM 8 .REMOVE .- --' ERRS.__..__...._....._ ERRE_. .-_._._.. � EER RE ._.. _ 35 OAR 20 PRESERVE_ K PECAN 6 REMOVE 140 ELM 6 REMOVE 305 ELM 6 :REMOVE .��y 36 OAK 16 motRVE 87 -AMR GO TEMUVE J AQ Tom REMOVE ]YES I CAN I REMOVE YI NUMBER 37 HAC NEREY 8 PRESERVE IS OAK 20 PRESERVE 142 ELM REMOVE 207 HACKBERRY 8 .REMOVE RRR II,. Q'4C73 1 ,.. 38 ELM 20 PRESERVE 99 OAK 22 PRESERVE 143 OAK REMOVE 206 ELM 18 REMOVE 39 ELM 8 PRESERVE 91 OAK 13 PRESERVE 144 OAK REMOVE 209 ELM 18 REMOVE SHEET TITLE 40 HACXIERRY 12 PRESERVE 92 ELM E REMOVE 145 OAK REMOVE 210 ELM 8 REMOVE 41 PECAN 34 PRESERVE 93 HA00ERRY 10 MITIGATE 146 OAK ' REMOVE 211 ELM 6 REMOVE TREE CONSERVATION 42 ELM 3 PRESERVE 94 ELM --- 6 MITIGATE _,147 ••ELM _ I REMOVE _ 212 ELM • 16 REMOVE PLAN . 44 _ REMOVE 213 PECAN 6 REMOVE 43 ELM 6 PRESERVE 95 CEDAR 6 MITIGATE 148 ELM 44_ PECAN _ 14 PRESERVE HR OAK 22 REMOVE 149 ELM I 1 REMOVE 214 ELM 8 REMOVE CASE#ZA15-072 .— ERRS_ _.. .. _...... 45 ELM 6 PRESERVE 37 OAK 13 PRESERVE 150 ELM REMOVE 215 ELM 8 REMOVE ..__.ERRE__ ERRE..__ __. ._ _.___ ERRE._ ERRE_ ERRE SHEET NUMBER _ 46 ,ELM __ 6 _PRESERVE___ _NI OAK 3 !PRESERVE._._ u'1 ELM ERRE: REMOVE _216 ELM 6 REMOVE 17 !IMOOEMY 10 PRESERVE 99 ELM 6 IPRESERVE 152 ELM REMOVE 217 ELM - 6 REMOVE O■ 100 ELM 6 ,PRESERVE 133 ELM REMOVE 213 ELM 8 REMOVE I I 1 - I 6reenbergIarrow 4 , 24IN RCP r n •G1*„ .. y _�1 {• K - -_ k '�- '-- = rf/2'CRP COOMBS RPLS 5294 (�� „ ���" - - __- G+rzIRF\ 5500 Democracy Dc Suite 125 FL EL=60555' a`^3-'� � �ll}-' v _._ .— ,� \ 0'j� .. ..SERE - -�, - _ - ___ 6ASSOC 511.IRP Nss 06 61c '-- 3'r !s "- t 972 514 7641 irz CIRFlANOSAND ASSOC _ - ___ 1;A Plano,TX 7SO2¢ or: I,,,...///;���.,. C.i Q�11r `1 Nal �- tr+v�� �'},V� �i��� I.�,�, k' i_ \ "IA <SPN Snk PROJECT TEAM `R 'z w� ,".SM II®) k '._ Win_ _5.-�'—_<SA . �_— , t iliroi�,�2,mik4_. Cit.*: ' :SAh—'' c,AN S,„ <So�Ot=SSyN L,..,,,---,,-_-,"..,e..._-=--<Sed=�T- ...att. `S" ._:S6h= :iN—=S%i— !�.:1 �-- en_� —1 _ E� 52:1N RCP 6 0 `_ E„ ^^1 ^��r 6e �LI( FL EL•BO9.f0' � I - / •% !..` "I i�1-.. \k -0- fi ' irgs S ���rrrrr • • �� r � 41 IP" / i, I f�F�� ....41143, Al 7 ii� r.•ii, ��d il ��R%, %i%if�l� ill,� 1.1 } fit z � P -j / 0o\ '�/1(_�JI.1-- 1� E�F1" L_ -mac �7rw��"rf+%4w>. IEm► mlm�� '1� FQ L YY e4,1741k DME �_-�-' _AIRY 11181 i� 4/ {irilb et .117alliF,`1 ���+ a'I, VA,I DWI fia 1, / /.. I +'�00_14x ro...� I� �04� �`(l1 %�I bi ry yry�1 ..6:1;:a-' 11` \ .'4 �'G10� /r /s� r i.��E1eW O O� � 1''� D �r� aGRAPHIC SCALE I I f3 _�/ *..I V.�4 + `` fsQj • •m�'1 I firyal q MD /I• tl'JE) CO gYR^CeHT NORCEe1 ��I � RJP�Cc �-"� 7 _ - m.drawing P,ownr or my a .mmimi b z IU .€ o� tle p above ¢ I `!l\9 ri-aQ\:►f P ,�' 4 Q uw. M.,.«6 P�.aww.a a..a re e< I _ ■ `�. v BUILDING AREA ®1 •• • � 2 9G+:a (iN FEST mr am nd.Po..om.moo m.s9«+� \. ,- U' `<+/_�� J� 042,808 SF(FIRST,FLOOR) R�' 3�z sr e rep on a ie n om manner w mou.me "* 2'4.- 8±4 / ,a ICge �+� -23,525;o(SECOND FLOOR) I�� ,. i lnoa- 4a ft °o.reproduced > %! I� I sPess Written perm froefro110.e...a r C z -`•� �\ , C -f(=< r �r \�Cis7lJ T(.1i AL=6;333 SF I((�F� _ - _ ISSUE/REVISION RECORD A •+h ��/ t' Q TRANSITIONALgARECENTER 1I WE DESCRIPRON Jo50 .1h \ A- p,5, `� -JrCr 5-25-1$ SOIEMA7ID PLAN BMJ v.,. {. - -.#-J '?1 -'.w\Q - F.F.E1624.0'1 ' .295 _ �e16 ) ,L-►_ ! sj,�..„_: �_ e'0 I IIit SITE TREE COVER'J+faE CfU_CS: B-fh15 91E PLAN BENSON • 320 I / ( ��/a, O�^. v��, ko I '..� CAL INCH 8-25-1$ DIY COMMENTS REVISOR 1 - / _ ` e •■ •■ , 9-9-15 SITE PLAN BENSON rr Q + -Bt) a # ,f TOTAL TREE PRESERVATION 1,322 10-18-15 STE PUN BENSON t e� _ 818 l�� C� 1 I _,\ / , / 1 TOTAL EXEMPT TREES REMOVED �` 11-08-15 EMSED BIDE FOOTPRINT - ` r, R .�� �, I TOTAL TREES REMOVED TO BE MITIGATED 110 ' �`'� r �(.� - XF'li I MITIGATION WI ON SITE PLANTING 12-09-15 REVISED SITE LAYOUT _r R6-5639.56' kVA .. *4 I� • �� ' - L=20728' L Q 4.4� / , ®pr /�y��,) BT ri ° ?-/ 01-19-18 91E PUN BENSON 7�c•yM,=N&l•1a091V. t`I' lin.' 7 7--. �F / 17/ %D�MI:M.- �� ( 1� 01-25-18 91E PLAN REN40N ... ^ irz•fJ7FLANDACC CHL.1�3'B1� .. I `�� T� ��� 1�• �� !; I I4 01-29-16 91E PLAN RLlR9CN SON -.Era ^ `" �_ ge .41141',17,11L:::111:. 1!I CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE . si �„R `�+'— nj Vii!---4, X-Cl/fRJD CUfFO1MD - - I— `` � � �- ,IiN■���.�"���,II* QA i I1 �Y :::: PRESERVED REMOVED MITIGATED r4 - - An y� O _--6_.--�_- __ MONUMENT FNDTXOOTBRASS _x_ _• ' `VAI P .- .]13__�.BS ' 3 F. I -- • - - rce / KU /f TREE TO BE REMOVED-EXEMPT __-- .B2t- A,.,, MONUAfEM FND iXOOr- w F' —J00�,-''A � "r-. : / .� i '+[ice _ - •--•.,�;�- = ..��i� - NOON ` I PROFESSIONAL SEAL -- TX[fdF"Rpyy � . ,sww4etE O1N'ra,rc 5y1. '..e" , -- �I-4r'• •:-‘, _._...- f-ERRE-..-- .�.... _ '.OOAt ERRE •�� i/ _ - -'i 91 , - G.L JOSEPH VAUGHN --� � p• ' LANDSCAPE ARCHDECT ,bry' .� LI p:2422 •&5 g5 ,A 6" • MONUMENTEND TX DOT LX-CUTRD cur FOUIDr + PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT INTENDED / 6' JU p - FOR CONSTRUCTION OR —T_-s -- /- • • V REGULATORY APPROVAL TREE SURVEY SUMMARY 48 HACKBERRY 10 I PRESERVE 301RM 1 6 MITIGATE 154 ELM I 6 REMOVE 2196 REMOVE 49 ELM 6 PRESERVE � ELM 6 MITIGATE � REM..__....6--,. ELM REMOVE 220 PECAN 6 REMOVE miminimm ERRE.. SD OAK 20 PRESERVE 103 ELM 24 REMOVE 156 ELM 8 REMOVE 221 ELM 8 REMOVE PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE G I JOSEPH VAUGHN,RLA # ' TYPE ERR COMMENTS 51 ELM 10 PRESERVE 104 ELM 26 REMOVE 157 ELM 6 REMOVE 222 ELM 6 REMOVE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 'OAK 20 PRESERVE 52 NAQOIERRY 6 PRESERVE 105 ELM 20 REMOVE 158 ELM 6 REMOVE 223 ELM 6 REMOVE LICENSE NO.2422 2 ELM 8 PRESERVE 53 ELM 12 PRESERVE 106 ELM 26 PRESERVE 159 ELM 6 REMOVE 224 HACKEERRY 6 REMOVE PROJECT MANAGER• 3 ELM 8 PRESERVE 54 _OAK________ 6 PRESERVELM 107 (E 8 PRESERVE 160 ELM 8 ':REMOVE 225 ELM 6 REMOVE MARLEY PHIWPS3 4 ELM 6 PRESERVE 55 OAK 8 PRESERVE 108 OAK 6 PRESERVE 161 !ELM 8 MITIGATE 226 ELM 6 REMOVE QUALITY CONTROL 5 jELM 8 PRESERVE 56 OAK 12 PRESERVE 109 ELM 12 PRESERVE 162 (ELM 12 MITIGATE 227 ELM 6 REMOVE 6ELM 8 PRESERVE 57 HAL:KERRY 6 PRESERVE 111 HACKB8 PRESERVE 163 ELM ERRY 8 PRESERVE 227 ELM 6 REMOVE DRAWN BY r_MESS. 7 BEIM 6 PRESERVE 58 ELM 30 PRESERVE 112 OAK 8 PRESERVE 164 ELM 6 REMOVE 229 ELM 6 REMOVE ON _ 8 ELM 12 PRESERVE 59 ELM 8 PRESERVE 113 !OAK 6 PRESERVE 165 ELM 6 REMOVE 230 ELM 8 REMOVE PROJECT■ANAME 9 ELM 16 PRESERVE 60 ELM 10 PRESERVE 114 (OAK - 6 PRESERVE 166 ELM 6 PRESERVE 231 ELM 6 MITIGATE ,r,AINSTRE ET ERRE 10 OAK 24 PRESERVE 61 ELM 10 PRESERVE 115 !CEDAR 8 PRESERVE 167 ELM 6 REMOVE 232 CEDAR 8 REMOVE 11 ;OAK 24 PRESERVE 62 ELM 6 PRESERVE 116 'ELM 10 MITIGATE 168 ELM 8 REMOVE 233 ELM 8 MITIGATE TRANSITIONAL 12 [OAK 24 PRESERVE 63 ELM 10 PRESERVE 117 !ELM 10 REMOVE 169 ELM 6 REMOVE 234 HACKBERRY 6 REMOVE 13 (HACKBERRY 8 PRESERVE 64 EIM-----ERRE. 8 PRESERVE 178E ,ELM 8 REMOVE 170 ELM 20 REMOVE. 235 PECAN 12 MITIGATE CARE 14 (OAK 16 PRESERVE 65 CEDAR 8 PRESERVE 119 (ELM 8 PRESERVE 170 ELM 8 REMOVE: 236 HACKBERRY 6 MITIGATE 15 ELM 6 PRESERVE 66 CEDAR 6 PRESERVE 120 ELM 6 PRESERVE 171 ELM 8 REMOVE 237 ELM 8 REMOVE __.16 ELM _ 20 PRESERVE 67 CEDAR 10 PRESERVE ...121 (ELM e_...6..- PRESERVE .__172 ELM._._ `.--_..-PRESERVE 238 ELM 6 REMOVE SOvU�THLAKE 17 NAON6RRY 6 PRESERVE 68 HACKBERRY 6 [PRESERVE - 122 I ELM I 12 PRESERVE 173 ELM B :PRESERVE 239 PECAN 6 REMOVE TEXAS 18 NACK$SRRY 6 PRESERVE 69 HACKBERRY 6 PRESERVE 123 (OAK 8 PRESERVE 174 ELM 10 'PRESERVE 240 PECAN 8 REMOVE 19 HACEIERRY 10 PRESERVE 70 HACJOERRY 6 PRESERVE 124 IOAK I 8 PRESERVE 175'ELM 12 'PRESERVE 241 ELM 6 REMOVE HIGHWAY 114 AND .. 20 HA018ERRY 6 PRESERVE 71 ELM 6 PRESERVE 125 OAK 8 PRESERVE 176 CEDAR 12 ;REMOVE 242 PECAN 8 REMOVE 21 ELM 18 PRESERVE 72 PECAN 6 PRESERVE 126 (OAK 8 PRESERVE 177 ELM 32 :REMOVE 243 OAK 10 REMOVE SHADY LANE 22 (ELM 16 PRESERVE 73 ELM 10 PRESERVE 127 ELM 12 REMOVE 178 ELM 10 REMOVE: 244 ELM 8 REMOVE ERRE — SERE. _23 IHAORERRY 6 PRESERVE 74 HACK6ERRY 16 [PRESERVE 128 ELM 6 REMOVE 179 ELM 8 :REMOVE 245 PECAN 6 PRESERVE 24 OAK 18 PRESERVE 75 RM 6 PRESERVE 139 ELM 6 REMOVE 1110 CEDAR 6 :REMOVE 246 PECAN 8 PRESERVE 25 OAK ,..„ 24 PRESERVE 76 ELM 6 PRESERVE 110 ELM 6 REMOVE181 CEDAR 1 6 REMOVE 247 ELM 6 PRESERVE 2 .__._. .. ERRE MO _ 26 OAR 32 PRESERVE 77 ELM 12 PRESERVE 131 ELM 300REMOVE 162 ELM -,...6 REMOVE 248 ELM 6 PRESERVE 00 27 OAK 1.4 PRESERVE e78 ELM S PRESERVE 132 !ELM 10 REMOVE 183 ELM 6 .REMOVE 249 ELM 6 REMOVE Y A,,- - j 28 OAK 14 PRESERVE 79 ELM 6 PRESERVE 133 'ELM 6 REMOVE 114 ELM 6 ;REMOVE 250 PECAN 6 PRESERVE et 29 OAK 18 PRESERVE W ELM 6 PRESERVE 134 (OAK ; 8 REMOVE 185 HA[KRERRY I 6 _._.__.. -......... ;REMOVE 251 ELM 6 REMOVE 30 OAK 11 PRESERVE 81 HACKIERRY 10 PRESERVE 135 OAK j 6 REMOVE 186 ELM ' 8 :REMOVE 253 HApEpRY 6 REMOVE 31 OAK 18 PRESERVE 82 ELM _6 PRESERVE 136 ELM 10 REMOVE 201 HACKBERRY 8 PRESERVE: 3432 IOAK 111 PRESERVE 83 ELM 6 PRESERVE 137 ; ELM 14 PRESERVE 85 ELM ERRE 14 !MITIGATE 138 ELM i' 10 REMOVE 202 [OAK 24 'PRESERVE JAN b r t 33 HA0C8ERRY 6 ERRE►RESERVE 84 ELM 30 REMOVE 138 HELM SO REMOVE 203 [OAK ; 26 ;PRESERVE OAK 12 REMOVE 204 ELM 8 REMOVE ERRE. ..�._. _..__..._. SEER ..._,.__ 35 (OAK 20 PRESERVE 86 PECAN 6 REMOVE 140 ELM 6 REMOVE 205 ELM 6 REMOVE - 36 TOM 16 PRESERVE 97 -PECAN - 311 REMOVE _ERRE 141 ELM 6 REMOVE 201 PECAN 8 REMOVE _- ROJECT NUMBER 37 'HACKBERRY 8 PRESERVE IS OAK 20 PRESERVE 142 ELM 6 REMOVE 207 HACKBERRY 8 :REMOVE 201 40730.0 38 ELM 20 PRESERVE 89 OAK 22 PRESERVE 143 OAK 6 REMOVE ,208 ELM 18 'REMOVE 39 ELM 8 PRESERVE 91 OAK _1_8 PRESERVE 144 OAK 6 REMOVE :209 ELM 18 REMOVE SHEET TITLE 40 IHACKSERRY 12 PRESERVE 92 ELM 8 JREMOVE 145 OAK 6 REMOVE 210 ELM 8 REMOVE: 41 [PECAN 14 PRESERVE 93 HACKEERRY 10 MITIGATE 146 OAK 6 REMOVE •211FIM 6 REMOVE TREE CONSERVATION _42 1ELM8 PRESERVE 94 ELM 6 MITIGATE 147 ELM 0 REMOVE 212 ELM 16 REMOVE--_., PLAN 43 ELM 6 PRESERVE 95 ...CEDAR 6 MITIGATE -.�148 ELM 8 REMOVE 213 PEGN 6 REMOVE -44OEM 14 PRESERVE.... 96 OAIK 22 REMOVE... ..-149 ELM... 10 REMOVE 214 ELM 8 REMOVE ERRE CASE#ZA15-072 45 ELM ..-._6 PRESERVE 97 OAK 18 PRMERL� 150 ELM 8 REMOVE .._215 ELM 8 REMOVE.. E—.._ ... _._ SEER ERRE _ SHEET NUMBER 46 ELM 6 PRESERVE !t OMC E lIE9HtVE 151 ELM 8 REMOVE 216 ELM 6 REMOVE___-._ ..._ _,—.,_ • _ -10PRESERVEPRE7ERW 159 ELM 6 REMOVE 217 ELM 6 REMOVE L..0.1 N 100 RM 6 PRIwRVE 151 ELM 6 REMOVE 218 ELM 8 REMOVE - I T greenOergiarrow CO.SSMH RIM EL=614.38" 8 PVC IN E=605.59 r.Suite 8"PVC IN(SSE)=614.54' / - - Plano,TX 75024 Democracy Dc Suite 125 8'PVC(N)=605.66' T,.�.., ",,, - t:972 514 7641 8°PVC OUT(W)=605.51' SSMH RI EL-62 85' - T- rNi' '- 1 PROJECT TEAM 21 IF 8'00 8'PVC OUT(W)=615.80' ? T 11.000 ) 6'PVC IN(E)=615.90' t� i 6 (. "Y'" 6'PVL IN(S)=617.90 5589 EL=��, SITE SSMH RIM EL= 621.75'v •ROPOSED 20' ©8"PVC OUT(W)=617.30' I.E.T. o -6 PVC IN SW FL EL= 616.85 �.A ORAL GE/ 6'PVC IN(S)=617.20' -- -""' 8" PVC IN - Np (E) FL EL- 614.85' SANITARY EASEMENT _ 9 8"PVC OUT(NNW) FL EL 614.75' 7 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE _ > SEWER&DRAINAGE �MING(PU&IC) Y t- EXISTING FH IE(ENRON POND EASEMENT(VARIABLE WIDTH) :- - - ' - ACCESS EASEMENT �' ".. / ; -` .. G-._G- G G G s G.. A G-AN.G_.0 CAD/ G G f _ G. -7 P _ > - - _ _ -CAIy-cep/ S.ATV=S.AT1L I1L -AIY - 'I► - DRAINAGE ..,,.,.. - :r._..,.., :N PROPOSED .� I ^ - SEWER& .aro ___ _ - - - - - _ -- EASEMENT • -1-7/37.-.7A7 37.-.7 7 :.vrAi#--aSAN •\ -- -_- - _ > /-: w - -- _- - - ... ( n..-...,.m..- ..�-.,c .. " - .. - AA;fr- AAs bh9 8 M.8 AAtB'' ! Ah,B: `MA. M,.B` NV.9 � ` • . _.- ! I ..... y - COPYRIGHT NOTICE '.SAYlRAR1F.A 3N7NINACE EASEMENT /,. e above _/'.j. .. 0 � M"B'-'-� - GIIII ___ _ eravn property-=c�A - - SITE LOCATIONMAP "P 'P d m a m L4 LF 6 ISDN zSAN *s,• esxw 2 a.. .not a a1;.1a .- tor am purpose other than m..0011C F t .000 �-'- _ ce w .::. ...:..-. -.l Q %(..NARY m N.T.S. / , oe� . nam ana can I 9 0~ - -4"ce EXISTING DRAINAGE rnme�aP1 m ism n:a of ao of II" (/ PRIVATE ��1 - L1 A:.� --__ - - ------ EASEMENT BOUNDARY aP� �_ ., _� - -_-. BA BIS. I l- - - `"` :, TO BE ABANDONED _ ISSUE/REVISION RECORD I. --- -- �, PATE OESCRP110N 1, a .1 4•CR ® � f I wilikALIIII DATE 15 oEsca TIC PLAN _ J ':-': : L5 II FL 621.00' - ®PROPOSED FH 06-11-15 91E RAN RE�A90N n DB-ir15 QTY COMMENTS REVISOR O 1,1 I .. . . I I I I.I 31 LF 6'6 5.1600 ® A pip ,N I GRAPHIC SCALE 09-09-15 91E PLAN TENSION m : - (PRNATE) r.rd I5. Tyyy1 r 1 - t7 Z I U77 ROPOSED FX FL 619.50 �9}� jl = I i 10-14-15 91E RAN REN90N 1 C/ 'SRHVIL'L' U I- W I 10-21-15 ME RAN RENS% .•DDC `5' w m 10-26-15 SITE RAIN REMS101 %. _• -r #� I .I^_ W/VAUL "; I (w FEEL') 12-11-15 91E RAN IEN90N :-S. POND ORARIAGE SAT"" 65 IF 6°® BUILDING AREA 1 man= ao ft.c'' ,,1` (TO BE DEDICATED) I O5 Z 15 I.�_.j I 60 LF(P O. > 5-19-16 91E RAA REN906 r-% `Z L FL 6t9.50RNATE) 42 808 SF FIRST FLOOR i 1 ( ) �3.83x 01-26-16 31E RAN TENSION �I I T I I. �� _,. ,___.(._1_1 __- TING DRAINAGE EASEMENT BGUND4 23,525 SF(SECOND FLOOR) FL 619.50 ___ --• /i i ' ...- I �-.,. 1=TO BE ABANDONED TOTAL=66,333 SF , I e"PUBLIC TRANSITIONAL CARECENTER ' , .`� P e SI I j I 5 I 71---8" - WATER LINE F.F.E=624.00 • c ...r- c7 aid i IV. ...gpONDARf OF PROFO I I ..J 'U I f, _ GENERAL UTILITY NOTES I i I I DRAAIAGE EASEMENT ..:.1 I ILL iF ( o 1+ 1. ALL FILL WIRRAL B TO BE IN RAE,NO CgIPACIED&60�INSfAUA710N OF I .I� -t-.-- q.i ...,14.g N . PROPOSED UR1.1116. IT y CT 15'UTILITY 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY AUTHORIZES INSPECTORS 72 HOURS BEFORE CONNECTING TO PIA'D05TRE LINE I i'...1., .I � EMENT ' .CORNER LUP PER :f - /1 'I 3. UNLESS SPECIFIED ON THE PIAN,GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER PPE SHALL BE AS E �-L--rel ORD:NEL i83 FOR L(NIIIWNiVi CID I '`- �.J rlMhtti A �- T (9 a „ f I + I I r.. I {I PVC 5SOUS0026 PER ATM D 7014,PFDROW PIPES USS THAN 17 DEEP U ..: ". 1 I PVC SOR26 PER ASTM D 30.14.FOR PIPES MORE MIMI 12'DEEP GASI `=-- ID.(m F'iN LILY EASEAIEI,R f-: �..' '?k'1.-, EXISTING FH`- ®PROPOSED FH CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIM 3'-0•COVER ON ALL SMRNTY SEWER PIPES. c � �"'� '- II I 4. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEEMED ON THE PLAN,WATER LINES SHALL BE AS A O A? ._ ,-.1 {"MID LARGER,RC C-900 PER ASTM 0 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY -- .rg -�-.a_ -�- I I - , • e. > CREME GLASS,50. 8"PUBLIC -��' �Ilt 4 _ n -. •. 3 SMALLER,SEAMLESS COPPER TUBING,TYPE*IC SOFT COPPER./STN BB6 L i: WATER UNE „-, 'y�, _ ® • y- - Ill © < 1 m 5. MINIMUM TRENCH WHIR MINI BE 2 FEET. ,i1--'"-.......----","' --'--.. I 6. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECWWIGL JOINTS WITH THRUST BLOCHING AS CALLED OUT ® END 8"FINE=" - '''- - I EXISTING FH + IN SPECFIGTDNS.ALL URINES SHOULD BER TEN(10')MART(PARALLEL)OR WHEN ..,.. 1ro -_.-- __ PILOT. CR0.tiSNG 1B'VERTICAL CLTARANLE(OUI50E EDGE OF APE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE).ST 1�G"J F W CONIRAC OR SHALL MVMAN A YINBIUN OF 3'-0'Cg4R ON P1 WA EA NIS. PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE G AY ' _-° ++-'-"'� --- 8. IN THE EVENT OF A WOOL CONRET BETWEEN WATER LUES,SANITARY LINES.STORM FARMAN SHIRMOHAMMA01 - - -- -- _..w 11p"""N'a'"a,A.o.A �' 11¢ -- .a-`_ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER -. - F D��"'-�:�:�. -,. U PRD wGAS nll YE�Cl10(!N MMIG IND PROPOSEO)D,TIE 51Mf UNE SHAH BE OUCRLE LICENSE NO 91366 Q "-��'-'77.77--------:------' g, _ %R ICA JOINTS AT LEAST 1 IffT ON 506 0 IN2,THE • ! Olel 'JGT. WATER DIE SHA1L HAVE MECHMIGL JgNR van, APRi0PRN1E THRUST BLOCNNG AS PROJECT MANAGER ' - 150802 TO PROVIDE A YNMUY OF 18.CLEARANCE REEVE REQUIREMENTS DY ALA AIARLEY PHILLIPS SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM A-A - - _ A21.10 oR ANS 21.11(ma 0-169(CLASS 50). R 8• QUALITY CONTROL FIRE RIOT. -_ 9. ONES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED,Ilarct,110 10 MPROIED BEFORE BICKFL NG. MARLEY PHILLIPS 640 840 LOOP BRAWN BY 10.TOPS OF DIETING MANHOLES NS.A BE BE E FOOT ABOVE TO D FLUSHWITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS,AND TO BE ONE FOOT PBPVE i7NISHEp GROUND GERARDO MONSNAIS ELEVATIONS WITH WATER TET UDS. G38 11.ILL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS 51441 HAVE A RINMCH 28 DAY COON SRENGM PROJECT NAME AT MOO P.53. E16I 13. ING AMTS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN Tan PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONr-20 G35 OF ANY NEW LIES r-----I SEWER&DPAINAGE EASEMENT 12,REFER TO INTERIOR PLUY860 DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF AL MLIT1EO 13,CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 031,PLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF LINES. OF TAE LO LINES. IES VMS REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTPIIATION OF THE INNER AND SEWER MIN/WATER a EM 14.THE N0 nuR R IS SPECIFICALLY ON CAUTIONED A TINT THE LOCATIONNARD/OR ELEVATION 15 EHE CO MMES AS PECRI ON THESE PWS U RASED RECORDS OF lE TION OF SOUTHLAKE 630 PROPOSED MODULI 630- M M CORMS,AND WHERE POSSB E YFASUR MD TS AEN IN THE TOO.THE TEXAS BLOCK WALL INFORMNWON IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING T OR COMPLETE.ME CONTRACTOR O2.,, 628 EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FELD LOCATION OF MOUES RHV SL BE THE IMOST CALL THE APPROPRIATE C I Ir���� STATE HIGHWAY 114 ._ I I;"A'A�: RESPONSIBILITY OF INE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL COSTING MLTIES WHICH CONFIIq WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PWS. 8'C'DAR WOOD 625 15.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AU,NECESSARY INSPECTION AID/01 CERTIFICATIONS &SHADY LANE _ SCREENING FENCE _ I M M� UTILITY KEY NOTES O REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR IHRY SERCCE COMPANIES.IHS AND TIE FINAL I EL.612.42 / SANITARY SEWER SEE NOTE FOR TYPE,SIZE AND SLOPE) CPOSSESSION. ONNECTIONS OF THE SFJMCE SHALL.BE COMPLETED 30 DAYS PRIOR TO STORE IA PROPOSED PROFILE Gzz c u1 ( PROPOSED LEGEND: 16.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE M11H A.UTILITY COMPARES FOR INSTALLATION i I PRC POSED STREET p 34 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE - PROPERTY UNE REQUIREMENTS MID sPESACAIOIN. -- ^I- U9 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER,MANHOLE STUB-OUT OR 620 W I T ti 619.25B.WATER E -620 CO CLEW-OUT.(CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION) EASEMENT LINE � PROPOSED CURB&GUTTER A 1.N ! -1 1zi=1 tt= OFFSET FROM EJLT,CMENT 618 U10 GREASE TRAP(PER ARCH./MEP PLANS) - T __ I V _- LU 1114 IRRIGATION WATER UNE(TYPE AND SIZE PER IRRIGATION PLAN) -E-E- ELECTRIC UNES - /// !BIKING PROFILE RESIDEMW I I\ 7T 915 U15 DOMESTIC WATER METER(SEE NOTE FOR SIZE) GAS GAS ONES \ Y� "•�\ U16 IRRIGATION WATER METER(SEE NOTE FOR SEE) -r-T- TELEPHONE UNES (� 4., U17 FIRE HYDRANT(PER LOCAL(RIDES) .SAN SANITARY SEWER UNES J AF f 2916 I IWOPD'.m U°:',AN.DON UK 612 ,t FL.614.75' U18 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT _-- _._--6.• -- -PR�p _ _ -- -__- - 010 FIRE DEPT.CONNECTION ON BUILDING(PER LOCAL CODES -aw-o'W- DOMESTIC WATER LINES -- SED STORM BEN42-%PE IB'1 R 612:12-- ) 61 Q I - V'Q U23 REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER -ww- FIRE SERVICE WATER UNES piar0 40730 0OJECT 0 111`-�1 ` ± 35' II-- a,,_-;EXISTING SEWER LINE FL 607.5. U26 WATER UNE POINT OF ENTRY(PER MEP PLANS) I , I 5,WBM'SEER IN MEAS MORE 656 U27 WATER UNE POINT OF CONNECTION IAN- IRRIGATION WATER LINES SHEET TITLE JI--L- 1 OF S : MRS 346 346 ELECTRIC SERVICE POINT OF ENTRY(PER MEP PLANS) -W-W- WATER MAIN 31- RIM ' 605 U47 ELECTRIC SERVICE POINT OF CONNECTION OFFSET FPOM EASEMENT 348 UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE SERVICE -CAN-CAN- CABLE TV LINES WET UTILITY PLAN 1.150 50 TELEPHONE SERVICE POINT OF ENTRY(PER MEP PLANS) CASE#ZA15-072 PROPOSED CAN UNE U51 TELEPHONE SERVICE POINT OF CONNECTION 600 PROPPEDGAS LI NE --600 055 CJS UNE POINT OF ENTRY(PER MEP PLANS) SHEET NUMBER 0+00 1+00 3+42 C-05 Station(ft) I I I __d.. Green erg rraw Be. ,r x E COA;.COA: T :_ t 5500 Democracy Dr.Suite 125 J ;• Piano,TX 75024 N,,.wv.• - ��,. ` t-972 514 7641 A i qui 0 # PROJECT TEAM t r SITE ° _ 771_ . x -x - x x - F x r� i. ..±�'` '•-• f -� � a- ,`�>=e.71q _ eiSFM -<STM <STM _ _ __ - _ F_ °1. , r 1 TLt mss` a Ix r( -c84;,I tiSAN .^.,y,,.. 4 t�r \ <.. �£ _., SP_ y2 .s'3'=<SAr cSAi�� IJP STN`- RN - r... ^+^ - �a� w e _/j +-i. -. `�` �� __ � ty --1-,-------:-,,,,,,, ,. ..., _� I'�__•22.01 1...._. "'Y 62048 TC _ _ le.. 1 � _' • _::+--- 1_, . - - .x:42 G 623:06 'i 4 • 82150 - 625-.65-IC - ... r,_ .r.1 ,.��:. �, --.. -� - - 395 I '- ` - - -- - '11'62:'6-26:5° I'" ' "':'7'88 it..• .40 7C 827.45 .. :r110:1111' s.�TC,"` I l 0.60 7C 6 TC ‘11 TC 823.30 ,3p �r.. I N c G 621.: 82 TC I 623.90 TC 3� COPYRIGHT NOTICE immill •`620+10 '�� 622.32 62I C 8623 G �ffx 80 2 � ew.,. t_\ ' SITE L MAP nr.rm4raa"I>I,wim''"wn°am%na io ne'� Q - • ] '4 - ® N T S for aeY Puryoea aMe n Mee Peefe > w 1. I �'T623,_,J �� 624.00 4.00 / 1624.32 eLn om wN of et a Redet f G LOCATION '-‘:,----- ClrlIl r ' ''' ''d. '- .7,'N;-_. - 623'.31 --- 11111111111.1wea'rePr°oeceee""a"r mei:.wlMe�n M. iei1I .I TiT Si6!! i - v _: I - 1621.26 lovIr1326.86623.45 G 624.00623.90 TC 623.80 I'��� v ,.we®wnuen wrm.o"wn,m.Pale coral _r,,,,,. N ! 82A_76 623.93 823.93 • 623.00 623.90 . G 623,40 c YA. ' GRAPHIC SCALE ISSUE/REVISION RECORD } l l❑ I x z I 621.63Y 624.00 624.00 624.00 624.00 - GATE DESCRIPTION 62310 i ., i N .. �' 624.00 �J _ k 06-25-15 SpIEA1A71C PUN L :'i t } _ 4.55 TC Q 0' 7 T 623.94 624.00 IM 623.88 j x 00 L6k24 - m °8-11-15 STE PUN BENSON i •�� tf`J 1 DEfENTION.POND -623.05 •23.7C623.93 7 6 623.T8/ _ (IN FEET) °8-25-15 Ott COMMENTS BENSON y - F8 ELEV 613:80 - 624.00 824.00 624,00# +-'�133 . .00 62226 . .:yL 1 Inch= 40 R 09-09-15 91E PUN BENSON *:;:11 I_ __ , I 624.00 BUILDING AREA\ 624.00 00 j 1 10-14-15 SIE PLAN BENSON 4 6 3.90 TC 624.00624.00021-15 91E PLCO BENSON I '• z __ i - SZ2.53 623.40 G '42,808 SF(FIRSTLOOR 62390 831%TC • t r I IEE I _ _ _ / 823.95 - -- - - - • =23,525 SF SEGO FLOOR 62285 E _ 6ID.83 .. _.___. GENERAL GRADING NOTES 10-26-15 SIE RAN REASON ( _ R C1: 12-11-15 SIE PIAN REASON A824,MXr - 1. ALL STORY SEWER STRUCTURES PLACED IN A PAVED AREA SHALL BE RUSH WiM FINISH GRADE 1 L f ."::// ,6-23.222.2' 23.2 • TOTAL=66•, F 66223244...09°°01. 24.00 I ANO SINE,NAVE A TRAFFIC BEARING FRAME AND LID. ALL SORA SEWER STRICTURES RACED IN 01-19-16 91E RAN WILSON I. r� �� 622.74, _ 623.95 624',00 624.00 TRANy91Tl• qL "4 'ENTER 623.91 I / - UMAVFD AREAS SNAIL BE 6 INCHES ABODE RN6H GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 01-25-16 SIE RAN REVISION /< . ,I�Ill I I I - 222 1"623.63 623.90 1, 00 624.00 624.00. j __\\\829 TC • I - .`.E 2':-"- �9 .Li"' 2 CdORALTOR SHALL ENSURE POSITIVE DRAHAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS FOR PAVED AVD UNPAVED .A' a ((it .� `��23 ` 623.77I624.00 623.73, 623.50 IIIENI y '. I1E� G 623,27- 623.90 _i 624.00 if+�i��623.50 / I. CONpD OFb,EAC ENC NS OF RP6 NECESSAa R R CONNEC ONS. �'Y -c 622.96 1T: - .- _ ®-� I1��`1��/ 622.'00 / _ 3. PIPE LENGTHS SUM ARE APPROXIMATE,CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY.BASED UPON FIELD �3Cx: i 1 22.46 G 624.00 • IEIEa 6235 �Il�� 623.95 ,.I 1 f•f� 1: >l/� ^623.02 624 00 623.95 • .1D T61 4. GEOIECARINCPI REPORT. PREPARAION SHALL COffORM WfTH SPELFlGTKKIS CONTAINED N THE I iOP _ 616.85 624.00 'J, 624.00 624.00 I _ I T• m* 7111181_,............e.62241 62391 TC 623'6°-'= ' .� Z� 823.88 Tr 624 BO G .• 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND WORNARSHIP SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE COUNTY p X817 �.PJ 1••• ,- 623.41 823.29 �'T�r`''� / LATEST CONSTRICTION SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. �.I "`•�._:- -A. 623.38,6 �! d� i 63120 62194 TC .3B G a THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY TIE COUNTY ALB T -`` 62144 G ._ I ,=-- -. _ .1 2 MANIAS RTIOR ro TIS STAif OF WNSIRILTax. 2LI ..2 '�_ ±aR -•STN 62296 G =�'62274 G�• ,,-___________,,1683.35,G 8 ,6-2321 G • �� tl �_I91 531.-IX ...PRIOR nl ONY IXGVAON OF THE PRGECf SIF. r imaig_ ism, I 5 3,21 8 .1 )) - �• , 55 7A4 'a 1623.74•TC . "1-4' 1 31 7 ME CONTRACTOR SIAL CNEFIALY PRE4INE BENL3WRI6,REFERENCE POINTS AND STAKES. -"' .- !► e R 623.19 1_0»0 Vis, 622.20.F.,�_ y 6 EX •�-_ `�__- -S)V t 2� .w,20 t y /a a ALL INDICATED ELEVATIONS ARE FINISHED ELEVATIONS. - S 'i .I 631.37 \ 23 4'7C v� __.. .\. _ - - -_..._`' - 622.64 G 6 �' a _�.. 1y -_ ,. . J 4.02; lil 9 Fl LESSONS. F APPLN.'ABLE AVERTS OF DOSING UN111ES FOR PROPOSED 1 "/' k ....- .. r CONNECTIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION- _ �� `�'-._ / _ t _ FIELD VERIFY SALES AND I n 1 _ _�-_ '- / "•, � -. 'Th823.69 TC / 632,(10 IX ip.LOCATE AND PROTECT AL UTILES AssOCATm WITH THE PROJECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTOR. • - _ .- _.-_ "r' 6-231' G / ��_ ��'•'�/(f'.J� 11.INSTALL SILT CONTROL MEASURES BEFORE BEGINNING SITE WORE.THESE MEASURES SHALL BE X _--_-c_ -�'-w- � .,.r: _ ---'•�� ���' 2�_... (' I warromED THRuGXOUT WIbTRUCION. K �- - • - - x 12.IMMO PROPER FROM RUNNING SITE DRAINAGE AT TO OR STANDING N BOATED RESDDUARDSCON'STRUCTON. PREVENT SORY WATER • _..... Wyr�R 3.Ln w , 13.INSTALL ALL APPROPRIATE TREE PROTECTION MEASURES PRIOR TO GRADING. 7 53251 - / �, "� 74.CUT PND FILL SLOPES SMALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 3:1. ., - - _ _ � :j� \ `\� , PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE -.. 1 ALL ENAVADON AWL INCLUDE CLEARING,STRIPPING AND STOCIOLING MP50 DAOING FARMAN SHIRMOHAMMADI ____.__. _ �_... / UNSUITABLE ARTERIALS.THE CONSTRUCTION OF EMBANKMENTS.CONSTRUCTION FILLS,AND THE FNA_ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER - -._- 5 SHAPING AND TOILING TO TIE THE UNE AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PVNS 1 LICENSE NO.91366 632.25'632 A: f TO.ALL TREES,BRUSH,AND O 00010 TOPSOIL MID OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE PROJECT MANAGER SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM A-A .UNLESS SPOFAED,P D DISPOSED OF AT AN°�_S EER LOCATION,WITH THE M4RLEY ARMOURS / --632.41 EX.,1 EXCEPTION THAT ENOUGH TOPSOIL DWI RE RETAINED FOR RESPREAD AND GENERAL LANDSCAPING. QUALITY CONTROL . AREAS WHICH ARE TO BE RUED SHAM BE COMPACTED TO A NONUR DEWY OF 95%AS -_,• .I- _ DETERMINED BY ME MODIFIED ARM COMPACTION 76T IN THE PAVED PRESS AND 92%IN ME MpRLET PHILLIPS 640 640 - ..`- _ -'- - OTHER AREAS -_ DRAWN BY /./ , f].OSTRIPPEN AND STRODE TEASEL SPREAD MFOURST(4)WOES MINIMUM OF TOPSOIL ON LANDSCAPE GERARDO MONSNAA IFAS AND REMOVE EXCESS TOPSOIL ERMA SITE PREPARE SUB-GRADE FOR PAVEMENT AND 638 CORES AND BACKED'CURBS AFTER CURB CONSTRICTOR. PROJECT NAME 18.PROVIDE SUPPLY OF TOPSOIL FOR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR FOR INSTALLATION N ALL LANDSCAPE SLANDS. 035 19. HOAND NS DET TOPSOIL N DISTURBED AREAS i0 BE GRASSED,TO INCLUDE PAVEMENT S SHOULDULD ERS AND OETINfON AREAS. 632 20.ALL EARTHWORK AND BASE COURSE FOR THE PARKING AREA AAL.BE COMPACTED TOA MINIUM OF 95%MODIFIED LABORATORY DEISTY. CERIIE1CA0ON SND COMPACTION SHALL RE maim BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE ENONEER,OR HIS/HER REPRESENTATIVE.PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF 630 THE BASE COURSE MARERAL BOTH PROOF ROLLING AND COMPACTION TESTING MUST BE AMMO SOUTHLAKE 630AND WITNESSED BY 7HE ENGINEER OR OWNER REPRESENTATIVE GENERAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED LEGEND: - 21.THE PAVEMENT SUBGRAOE AND BASE COURSE MATERW SHALL BE&SPECIE°PND APPROVED BY TEXAS SL.aI -028 A S,W PRIOR TO INATION OF STORM OR SANITARY SEWER,WATER MAINNY OR AOTHER MIMES,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE, PROPERTY UNE THE ENGNER OR OWNER REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSIRUCTNG THE EASE AND SURFACE COURSES THEREON. PROPOSED MODULAR VWFY,AND SORCALCULATER A11 POINTS OF FROM ME AND ALL LTO CROSSINGS AND INFORM THE HALL AND THE MINIUM OF BLOCK WALL /// ANY COIRLCIS OR REWNE°DEVIATIONS FROM 11E RAN PRIOR a CONSTRUCTION.NOTIFICATION SWILL BE MALE A YCOAUM OF 72 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 22.CONTRACTOR SMV-PROVIDE POEM DRAINAGE TO ALL INLETS AND CATCH BASINS. NESS OF STATE HIGHWAY 114 Y/ HERB PRIOR TO UCHBN TIFICA,THE ENGINEER AND Ifs CLIENTS SHALL BE HID HIANLESS N TIME EV7Nf THAT THE CONTRACTOR 8'CEDAR W000 525 FAGS TO RAKE SUCH NOTIFICATION. PROPOSED CURB&GUI'fER SURFACE PoNpING SHALL BE COARCTED BY CONTRACTOR AT NO MOITIOHAL DANSE TO DIE &SHADY LANE M SCREEN MNG FENCE DIALER B. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY COMTRUHEON SHALL BE GRIN SMOOTH AND FOUR ACHES OF TOPSOIL R. . IF ADEQUATE TOPSOIL 5 NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IOPSOI,APPROVED BY THE OWNER.AS NEEDED. %XXX PROPOSED CONTOUR 23.IF AREAS IRE DEIUIBED BEYOND PROPOSER GRADES BY NEGLIGENCE O THE CONTRACTOR,THE CD EL 821.31 • 622 THE AREA SHALL THEN BE SEEDED/SODDED.FETOLRED,MULCHED.WATERED AND MANTMED UNEL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS CLRRACTOR SOUL-BE HOD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY REGRADING OR REPAIR TO MATCH ORLHAL C PROPOSED STREET 1 PROPOSED PROFILE C ESTABLISHED IN AIL MEAS. ANY RELOCATED TREES SHALL BE HARMED ANTS SUCH PONT AS TREE S RE-ESTADJSHED.ANY -SIN'.-S�.- PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER PIPE EXISTING CONDITIONS 620 AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF TIE PROJECT 5HN1 BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT O 03 NO MDIfONAL COST TO THE OWNER. >A7O DRAINAGE SLOPE AND DIRECTION 24.SHORING SHALL BE ODE AS NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE AND NO FOR THE SAFETY �. 620 /'� OF PERSONNEL SHORING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OSHA MD LOCAL REGULATIONS. C. THE CONTRACTOR B SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION ARD/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING MORES AS SHOWN ON THESE XXX.XX SPOT ELEVATION • r a) PLANS IS BASED CR RECORDS OF TRE VAFMDUS UTILE COMPARES.AND WHERE POSSIBLE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN N THE FIELD.THE FEF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION 25.STRUCTURES FOR STORY SEWERS SHAM BE N ACCORDANCE NTH THESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND THE APPLICABLE STANDARD SPECIFTCOST SH WHERE GRANULAR TRENCH BACIOn1 IS REQUIRED 618 INFORMATION E NOT TO BE RLILED ON AS BEING EXALT OR COMPLETE THE CONDUCTOR MUST CALL TIE APPROPRIATE UTILITY FG FINISHED GRADE AROUND THESE CONTRACT TME COST SHALL BE STRUCTURE. AS INLDEMN ARD SHALT BE II• l i ti ,= COMPANY AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY IXCAVATON TO REQUEST EXACT FOLD LOCATION O ATTICS. -- -MIMING-MU UJG GUTTER D IN THE STRUCTURE, UNIT PRICE FOR THE S CONSI ERE RESIDENTIAL_ _ ' O. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR SPECIFIC SUE SOD.CONDITIONS PESO CONSIDDUTOS, TC TOP OF CURB �EW °BOF\ 2D CONFIRM INVERTS OF ALL COSTING STORM INLETS AND SANITARY SEWER RANKLES BEFORE ((�� lhJ Y / WRC 615 FL FLOWLINE I.1 �� E CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY COYPIEIELY WITH THE LATEST STANDARDS OF LISW D ECIAES OR ANY OMB AGENCY WING �,,, SIDEWALK LJtl1ENCNG CONSTRUCTION. JAM JURISDICTION FOR EXCAVAON AND TRENCNNG PROCEDURES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE SUPPORT SYSTEM,SLOPING,BENCUNG EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS 2].A GEOTIXIIE MATTING(101000CK ORAL 450 OR EQUAL SHALL BE USED FOR EROSION AND OTHER MEANS OF PROTECTION.THIS 6 TO INCLUDE.BUT NOT UNTIED FOR ACCESS ND EGRESS FROM ALL EXCAVATOR ARD EX ALDER) 612 TRENDING.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR COMPLYINGWITH PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AS REQUIRED BY OSHA. CONTROL AN All SLOPES GREATER TIM NEIN. TIM= XXX.XX ELEVATION 0 TOP OF WALL N`'r_A'T F. ALL HOPE RPE SHAD.BE N-12 ST IB(OR EQUIVALENT)WITH SMOOTH NTERIORCOEURD ANNULAR COEUR CORRUGATIONS 4--A8' BW= XXX.XX ELEVATION 0 BOTTOM OF WALL 28.DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS - 610 610 PIPE SHALL MEET ASTM F2E48(OR MUM 4252 TYPE 5)REWIRETENS,AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMA HAANNGS'n'corm VALE - _-_.. 29.CONTRACTOR SL ADHERE TO PROPOSED GRADES ALONG CREDIT,ESPECW ---_-LY IN THE AREA OF .' OF 0.012 JOKE SHALL BE WATERTIGHT ACCORDING TO ASTM 03212(OR AVM 11252 1.1294)REQUIRDE7RS GASKETS SHWA MEET THE PROPOSED DETENTION POND.IF AREAS ARE DISTURBED BEYOND PROPOSED GRADES BY PROJECT NUMBER t 35' THE IEWIENEHIS OF ASTM F4T7.JOINT PERFORMANCE.FITTINGS,MATERML PREEMIES.AND INSULATOR SMALL BE DONE PER DETENTION POND ACCESS EASEMENT NEGLIGENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR,THE CONRACTOR SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY 201 40730.00 w 608 THE COMPLETE ADS SPECRCAION FOR ADS N-12 WT IB PIPE FOUND IN THE MS,INC.DRAINAGE HANDBOOK.LATEST ROTTEN. / PENALTIES INCURRED. G. IF USING HOPE PERFORATED PIPE FOR SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE AND DETENTION/RETENTION SSTOIM,THE PERFORATIONS SHALL MEET 30.NL PROPOSED SPOT E.EVATIONS SHINN NORSE FINISHED GRADED 0.0005ONS AT EDGE OF SHEET TITLE THE PASHTO CUSS II STANDARD PERFORATION PATTERN REQUIREMENTS. PAVEMENT ARD/OR GRADE BREAKS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 605 H. ALL STORY SEWER ONES 1B'-54'METER ARE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE RPE ACCORDING TO ASND C-76 TYPE III UNLESS OTHERWISE 1N0ICATED. GRADING PLAN 602 CASE#ZA15-072 600 -600 �N+EET NUMBER 0+00 1+00 3+42 V-06 Station (ft) GreenbergFarrow COA CO, 5500 Democracy Dr.Suite 125 Plano,TX 75024 t:972 514 7641 18*45 PROPOSED 20' DRAT GE DEGREE BEND e E PROJECT TEAM INV 609.03 SANK ASEMENT CONNECT TO EXIST.24'RCP Ct..0 1.0$ 0 e'•O 121$ x / 608.00'FL EL ._ X __.- .;:. X . X. -X _� X .__. X :4.. - X X .--„- x ----- __ . 18 45' _ 8*4 NV 18'813.85 IETENBON POND DEGREE BEND - DEGREE BEND 1D Tolle -" /_., .ACCESS EASEMENT INV 608.92 .. - 7= 1s - -- -�-. - -_lNv 613.0.2 __ _ ®.RCP .0$-.- 0 1_ _ - _� _- _._. _ _ _ _- .... - � _ _ - - W. IF . 'S S f - -,4 0. �i�-.TM _e-sTM 5-STM -<.STM hSTM TM c -_ T _ •. -- -- _ .__ "... ' _.,..„_,_,,_„_,..f.., ,_ _„ - iii...... Ore,4a'e3..=JAeeJ♦4Y Y rNJ♦ qi*M.P.AI , - _..2= 675 --- __ __. ._ rl -77.7.7-.. ...-----41.111,)�� _ , RCP a ass®r FL 60830Th � p 16' il I 3 PROPOSED OUTFALL; Ark. .0 1.0$ DISCHARGE(CIS _ Nv � � . ' 609.65ID �� �7i� s I - © • I� I I (5.68)2-YR i� I COPYRIGHT NOTICE '� I 1 _ �� ltnc arming s the property or Mea e ,g �/g/ (11.74)10-YR ;® ,t a 396 LF 18' IN INV.12'614.06 • referenced Professionalwd not 305= - I 1 `{ _,6 fill/(18.94)100-YR - RCP 0 1.637. - �7 A I{OUT INV.le 613.75 \ agaves ISSUE/REVISION RECORD . 1 79 LF6 mr- t I ` -fy 5'_ ._{._ 1 " HOPE O 5.85 E 1 .:/ , B-2d � �. 924 I DoE DESCRIPTION e 1.+ i I':DOE' NT10N 40aNG _ I 1-_. ri. 9.24 JG' •UN.681B 6 6924 _ 08-25-15 SCHEMATIC RAN ; I - DFi _ 9.24 ', - Io' iC.S4 OB-4S-t5 Dry COAl1ET175 BENISON 1-15 STE PLAN ROSSO( 1 5' }64V' .12*619:7 N� I I M-09-15 91E PLAN RM90N �1▪ 1 I v..I- 'T `1 5-- i" 23,525 SF SEGO FLOOR .-� - f 10-14-1s 91E PUN REVISION in M ' _ __ -. - --- _ .. ... T4T N=6133 SF 9�4 • ` .. ® 10-21-15 SHE PLAN RENSON 10-%-15 SITE RAN REVISION ��-) \` 1 I ._._� • TRANSI I AL1 LATER IA'•r F.F.E-;�•'.t'•`� q._� -15 91E R.AN REN9aN ,/ 1 - ��// { -' 8 680J 01-19-16 91E RAI REM9aN 1 I �irf' . Nr, DC4 -..'"//11/1 le AREA I._ r ;-�r •E EASEMENT __ Q!._ \ *i' / I • 082 N. ��C�1%* INN.12.620.: . 1 .�\• `�`sr� - v 11.1-1- C _ -1 ��2ww. 1. 1 11 / n.. ' : 1! r J 1 k - I R .839 _ I + ® .I • 1 WI7Nr Bl HDPE O OS$© / I '{ EI CHL=253.81.,1•1, y® :1 1\' T.,_141 r© 11�.. ■ =t v _� ` ' / I ^'' _. _. i l'UflLltt FgSEMENI' (- 1 - I _ -:A 255. `87M v1iF 0 HDEP 0 N i'' IiriliNIF or .. 'i `-.cep - - >„ o .x • Ill" + .. --. -----74,1.--_. • 4.0 - i ' . 1 - ;,?.-, ^..L. .c. 3._4.1.-__i r�� I . 1 -- -- .� _ r 12'619.75 '7 ----._ ' - ST J' - -'- - - _ _'_'.., eN 6'619.75 / GRADING KEY NOTES -Q FHIGH�jAYNo. --- ®� ) • --- .. - am k5n5em 111._ - --- ���� -•� :.-.-.�������� 02 STORM SEWER(SEE NOTE FOR TYPE,SIZE AND SLOPE) ---_ / -.._- �wei�.�. ,•,� G6 CURB INLET .....,_.. / -_._.. ._ -, �J • GSI GRATE INLET.SEE NOTE FOR GRATE TYPE. -�- / t �-.24,86.91 A�� HARMAN SHIRMOHAMMADI •�I f PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE 017 CONCRETE HEADWALL I. - / G26A RIP RAP PAD f f' /_... PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 5278 CURB CUT WITH RIP RAP PAD ff •/ f LICENSE NO.91366 Exisitfng Event with Existing Detention POND PROJECT MANAGER 100.3335 00/7013014 50,015 CALCULATIONS L/ARLEY PHIWPS a301071151400111113MY0ML 0115000 PROPOSED LEGEND: Event Inflow *Primary WSEL Storage QUALITY CONTROL OVEN z331.- PROPERTY ONE (cfs) (cfs) (feet) (cubic-feet) MARLEY PHIWPS 20,= illi 5,.30.01 ---- EASEMENT UNE 1-Year 9.06 8.44 609.40 1,688 DRAWN EY rroo o= ,05 aer Fe0i4Rd sax,O.=R,eN a GERARDO MONSNNS PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 1 0-Year 15.98 14.56 610.01 4,272 5axo=MEP' PROPOSED CURB&GUTTER 100-Year 23.72 18.98 610.67 9.581 PROJECT NAME HydroCAD Design PROP rx-Tonronl County 700-rear Durolion=60 rein, lnfen=3.64 in/hr 100 Yea 2 1 6 M -xxxx - PROPOSED CONTOUR Prepared by GreenbergFarrow Printed 1/25/2016 12:30:05 PM 5nes 0106 Os Ee. 1000 0.w= 1516 0.e 9 * OUTFLOW EXISTING DETENTION POND HydroCAD 9.10 69 loran. a ala C.Oil x _0.34 ,w T. 0514 ds Y, win 05272 2010 droCAD Software Solcnons LLC ism, a T5 a Oa. Til o:0.= II d0 �� DRAINAGE SLOPE AND DIRECTION 20 Mn m 2 es CP e • 75 IIs= 4070 ds Summary for Pond DETENTION: POND r 570 O=0.e_. 610 9.04: 40_01 ds wn.n: = m a o1"." 401 0.a all do NI .111 in DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY Proposed Event with Existing Detention POND 50 nan I= 400 a 07 4 .00 95= 3031 da rY Event Inflow *Prima WSEL Inflow Arta= 9.055 cm, 0.00X Impervious Inflow Depth= 2.3r for 100-Year event 60 non. a 211 a 004. IM ac 0.61= 2707Storage OD rho 20. "a 331 i fie 00. = 1706 d0 A-1 DRAINAGE BASIN ID SOUTHLAKE Inflow = 50A9 Cts O 0.17 hrs. Volume= 1.313 of leo ran. _ ,n m 0.0• 1.01 100= 12.76 da (cfs) (es) (feet) cubic-feet, Outflow = 16.94 cfs 0 1.03 hrs. Volume= 1.302 at 070 non. = 15 a Et• 1.00 104= 7.5 as 0.44 DRAINAGE BASIN AREA(ACRE) 1-Year 22.01 14.33 609.98 4,103 TEXAS Prima = 16.94 cfs 0 1.03 hrs Volume= 1.302 of 22o nsn m 764 04 01 x 0.54 15= 4.61 da Primary 9.24 INTENSITY FOR 100-YR EVENT-10 MN.STORM 3.66 100-YR STORMWATER RUNOFF CFS 10-Year 35.29 18.23 610.55 8,610 Routing by Stor-Ind method.Time Span=0.00-3.00 hr*,41=0.01 hrs (CFO) 100-Year 50.09 22.01 611.22 14,474 STATE HIGHWAY 114 Peak Elev.612.39'0 1.03 hrs Surf°Area= 17.518 sf Storage=56.794 cf 5 ea stem In 5 x DM • 60 = 23.454 d 00 as x 15 • MAI a 60 _ SI4I d &SHADY LANE sr40+_ +.3 d # I DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION Volume invert Avoil.Storage Storage Description- PROPOSED CURB INLET * OUTFLOW EXISTING DETENTION POND _ MI 608.30' 67.643 of Custom Stage Data(Irregular) Usted below(Roosts) 10 nF Nam of 0.y , EDN . 1100= 600 = .20000 25003 e 000010.= 27.005 cl 11111 PROPOSED GRATE 15 mews w ie as • 5 = 30$31 d Proposed Event with Proposed Detention POND - - 00 as x zs 0 nn. w = 10305 a Event Inflow *Primary WSEL Storage ITI Devotion Surf.Area Perim. Ina.Slore Cum.Store Wet.Area '90005`- 393°9 ° (c(s) (cfs) (feet) (cubic-feet) 411. ' (feet) (sq-f t) (feet) (cubism(eat) (cubic-feet) (eq-ft) 20 sin h 5 5 Wen 200 , 4170 a = 57 a 608.30 10.345 543.9 o a 10.345 s • 10 4 133 ' = 1752 d PROPOSED LEGEND: 1-Year 22.01 5.68 610.29 24,026 ' �1:4I�!!�111=i-d■ Out a 5 30 sm•ase= 42.550 cf 609.00 11.505 557.0 7.644 7,644 11.556 PROPERTY UNE 10-Year 35.29 11.74 611.52 41,776 �5 610.00 13.207 576.0 12.346 19.990 13.360 10 6114770001 .it 6 OR x • N "22 a .771 100-Year 50.09 16.94 612.39 56.794 +A ^ (7 ,�9 0.6 . 40 . N a 07 = 2370 011 - - - EASEMENT UNE 611.00 14.967 594.0 14.078 34.068 15.135 0.71 �� 'rJ `7 6 # 00 N Storage= 50315 612.00 16.783 613.3 15.866 49.934 17.085 PROPOSED RETAINING WNL 613.40 18.651 632.1 1.7.709 67.663 19.049 40 min MOM In 40 0 34131 x 5 = $3073 on * OUTFLOW MODIFIED PROPOSED DETENTION POND 02 as • 50 • lase: El) - 2e470 a PROPOSED CURB&GUTTER Device Routing Invert 0 II t Devices sic05°= 54170. cl -- 1 Fr.mary -_--_---608:30'-24.0"----Rbuad Culvert 50 ei19[sn Cus : 3031 x I Be = 110 60 i4.40 d UMTN11 7NU S OF CONSTRUCTIO NUMBER 4 L=40.0' RCP,mitered toe m foro fill. Re=0.700 ' Swage` 56 776 d -XXX% - PROPOSED CONTOUR 20140730.00 inlet/Outlet Invert=608.30'/608.10' 5=0.0050 7. TIME TO REACH MAX. wmesseemee Co=0.900 no 0.013 VOLUME I do mnsan I In .0 2707 . ace := 07334 d GRAPHIC SCALE as x 7o x - PROSTORM S POSED EWER PIPE SHEET TITLE Stoma= i=gini-MAXIMUM POND VOLUME Primary OutFlow Maa=16.94 cfs O 1.03 hrs HW=611.09' (Free D`schorge) INFLOW VOLUME 100 ti=Culvert (Barrel Controls'16.94 cfs 0 5.39 fps) 120 mn seam n In 1706 x CO = 122.733 cf 'H9O 0.4 05 x 100 x 1e SIB x DO = 74 022 a /r DRAINAGE SLOPE AND DIRECTION Stowe= «511 d DRAINAGE PLAN 1 = XXXX' FINISHED GRADE 0 TOP OF WALL 1Bo am tea x Izls • COz0. 335 d 7.9 ran 1 inch cnor 0 ft.0.4 05 x loo x 1708 x 60 = 106.1.a BW= XXXX' FINISHED GRADE 0 BOTTOM OF WALL CASE#ZA15-072 sow.= 20.020 a 350 33,01 seam 160 - 155501 n % 0.4 0.5 x 370 x 1EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER 8.97 x 130 = 20678 07 Jac swage= •017011 a GOT OF CURB O 7 GUTTER 720 mn Slam 67 720 x .51 x 00 - 10:.55 d CU 05 x 730 v IB BB c ea = 415012 d = Storage= 1220.1541.1