Loading...
Item 6B Site Data Summary Chart Proposed Site Plan Existing Zoning "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District Land Use Designation Retail Commercial Gross Acreage .85 Number of Proposed Lots 1 Area of Open Space(sf) 14,661 Percentage of Open Space 39.74% (35%min.) Area of Impervious Coverage 60.26% (65%max) Proposed Building Area(sf) 3,659(footprint) Number of Stories 2 Maximum Building Height(ft.) Approx. 32' Required Parking (14 for office/retail)+(14 for coffee shop) + (5 for cleaners) =33 Provided Parking 39 Variances Requested 1. Driveway separation The applicant plans to utilize two existing drive approaches for the development. Neither approach maintains the 200 foot required separation from the intersection of Dove Road and Kimball Avenue. Because the property does not have 200 feet of frontage on either the north or east property frontages, and because the driveways are existing, the applicant requests a variance to allow driveway spacing under 200 feet from the intersection of Dove Road and Kimball Avenue. 2. Tree preservation The applicant plans to remove two existing trees on site,which comprise the large majority of existing tree coverage. The tree preservation ordinance requires that at least 70% of tree canopy coverage be maintained in cases where less than 20% of the total site is currently covered by tree canopy. Because the existing overhead easement and drive approaches limit the manner in which the property could be developed while preserving the trees, the applicant requests a variance to allow the trees to be removed. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Site Plan Approval Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated January 19, 2016 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map (F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (G) Full Size Plans (for City Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 David Jones (817) 748-8070 Case No. ZA1 5-1 36 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Donnie Ward APPLICANT: G&A Consultants PROPERTY SITUATION: 2199 E. Dove Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 34, F. Throop No. 1511 Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District HISTORY: -The City Council rezoned the property from "AG" Agricultural District to "L" Light Commercial District on June 20, 1972. -The City Council placed "C-1" zoning on the property with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 on September 19, 1989. -A Specific Use Permit was approved by City Council to allow a snow-cone stand on April 20, 2004. -A Specific Use Permit was approved by City Council to allow a snow-cone stand for a period of two years on March 15, 2005. -A Specific Use Permit was approved by City Council to allow a snow-cone stand for a period of three years on March 6, 2007. -A Specific Use Permit was approved by City Council to allow a snow-cone stand for a period of three years on February 2, 2010. -On January 27, 2012, demolition permits were issued for the previous one story brick and metal commercial building (1299 E Dove Road)and one story brick building (1500 N Kimball Avenue). The buildings were utilized by a variety of businesses, including an office, cleaners, a video store, and a salon. -On August 31, 2012, a plat was filed for lot 34, F. Throop Addition No. 1511 (record #D212214780) -A Specific Use Permit was approved by City Council to allow a snow-cone stand for a period of three years on June 12, 2013. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum has not been held for the proposed Site Plan. Case No. Attachment B ZA15-136 Page 1 SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use Future Land Use ZA15-136 ---- 700-Year Flood Pfain ®Corps of EnONeers Property -Public Park/Open Space Public/Semi-Pubic Low Density Residential Medium Density Residentlal Office Commercial Retell Commerdal Mixed Use Town Center Regional Read Industrial 0 156 010520 Fut IfIs j � The Southlake 2030 Consolidated Future Land Use Plan designates this development area as Retail Commercial. The Retail Commercial category is a lower-to medium-intensity commercial category providing for neighborhood- type retail shopping facilities and general commercial support activities. It is intended to provide limited local retail and/or office uses which serve neighborhoods in close proximity. It is intended that all uses in this category will be compatible with adjacent single family uses, thereby maintaining the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. This category is intended to encourage comprehensively planned developments. In areas where the Retail Commercial designation is adjacent to residentially zoned properties or areas with a residential designation on the Land Use Plan, lower intensity activities such as office or office-related uses should be planned adjacent to the residential uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, and Office Commercial categories previously discussed.As proposed,this Site Plan seems to be consistent with the Future Land Use Plan. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Retail Commercial category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Land Use T •e Percenta•e Flexibilit Retail 65% ±35% Office 20% ±20% Open space 10% ±10% Civic use 5% ±5% Total 100% *These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide Case No. Attachment B ZA15-136 Page 1 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The property has approximately 210 feet of frontage along the northern boundary adjacent to E Dove Road. This road is improved with asphalt surface and an existing right turn lane. The property has approximately 150 feet of frontage along the eastern boundary adjacent to N Carroll Avenue, a fully improved street with four lanes and center medians south of Dove Road. Traffic Impact The development was found not to meet the traffic impact threshold necessary for a Traffic Impact Analysis. TREE PRESERVATION: The development as proposed does,not meet tree preservation requirements. A site with less than 20%tree canopy coverage is required to preserve at least 70% of its coverage post-development.A 26"caliper American Elm and a 25" caliper Cottonwood comprise the majority of existing coverage on the site. Both trees are proposed for removal. In order to remove the trees as proposed, City Council must grant the applicant a variance from the requirements of Tree Preservation Ordinance no. 585. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: January 7, 2016; Approved (6-0) subject to the staff report dated December 30, 2015 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated December 9, 2015 and specifically approving both variances. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated December 30, 2015. N:ICommunity DevelopmentlMEMOl2015 CasesI136-SP- Ward Retail Bldg Case No. Attachment B ZA15-136 Page 1 Plans and Support Information . • • Proposed Site Plan • , I 1 I. r ' I \� Rickey McPherson et ux _ ;11 1, _ �. Vol. 8340, P9..437 .. , • *. ,se., - 11 '.,_ fk • 5 ,11 F '\1 7/y0 J. • CCN .f:;:.:.. ..h\ 3r/fib/ F -\ ��-\ • ---...,...„,... qI ` „x� ��30 J. -- • '. I4.] 6d'�T 65" L 1.Y0.G9' at/7 qO 4O `�\ II iR3' \ /r .T.� ell � s6;Ls57" 214.31/rC,,;ee zt;:6f -a- \' /--- r/ .. a _ .- iia 1:� I . `BOG R25 1 ,^,��' £X.ASPHALT I O I� \ R3iTFK. &INS .ate \\ S --8' T \•\ S 82',0'15- E 41.42' ` I 40 :RO 1 R RIP '•P I ,l �TYP.) f.a' a I - ' II • _ -I : rraviflo-J� r ., �� s', iIII IIA 18.0 E•. :\ \ ..., __-. i'r fl" 930 in:�,•' \ � S 30'29'15-E 52.17' __ _ \ 1LE ho Souchlake R in t124315t pumm,� INSTRUkAENMI. °' ;v n H, __ /PROPOSED <Vy\ 1: I —_\III " . .134 • :: ' BUILDING i \`'o. r"•p°,A .- te :9: BUILDI7cN'dG/ dEL�s4\ , • 24=0' 3,659 111,$`f- ""8„4, • E,3, R3' a. .LI —'4\'r`3y ,.. .und R C • I IEli �� ■I6 FU ISH : I .TSLL: • r II ( ''-, I, •.° , . _ Liiii _ie_0 -9CK -$ R•. 3010. I. I F. I 11111 1 i1 •it Y ' ^ \FURNISH & INSTALL: u , i ' Iii /"r o iii f:/ .'1,__ 2-ADA PARKING SPACES -If' I 1 i ta•�x ua3 I , '/ 2-ADA SIGNS I.Yi 132 r at4" I 4 a _►r 1-ADA RAMP _ mo, ''''1' - I I . o I — r 1.B.0 9.._ 1—ADA LOADING ZONE I- : I ?a f II 1 FURNISH &INSTALL• t Exp' It I „I, J R2 1-DO NOT ENTER SON n, 93.0' Mil .. 30.7 N $ l C3 I II ..A. .J I ��”' u �,9 h O I .I' II Pl--R5' :" I w� CC I OR5 _ cofi - - R21' I 3 ,. \ R30 a, TYOB m 15.0.': I R5 R55' o J m r _ f R3'a \ \ I Q .75 1 ! 'N a Kenr-re.'/.;4�lar ✓ c_ - _rr> m Z I • '4. s, L'ergh Anh Ird . hI Lnr1_- 1 s... r Il�c_ < esJ :Vol,• • 53 Pg, 1x35..^.y ml I E.. .r- . v I / . • ?• , 1504 : d:. L.3TC.T. d r ' I `n ..' `y,. .g 848 c ie 84. A'c..NET4 a L EPDXYDOWEL & INTO { - 1 I /` e,• a 1\•n1 a • _LLD_Re ai eCommer'e I I EXISTING PAVEMENT • •I U I / 25 ro w — — — Gill W/j4 BARS ®18' O.C.E.W. Z p kL _ t I .C' Itv, i b a ` I R301 1 R5' r, e. I t. •I`����.�e�E���I !1 r rt ■ (TYP.) _ _-0 65'9-9 3/6'NF - -'± " ' _ - -_ - T fl m R30' - - LCaYe011>61 - rO"�`� av YS '/7" 6•L 0u3e 09 •• _ -_ . 20'AlneIY 9n --.B-L.:C®A5k•a„ I -9 L!C9H9KK ELY - .4.' ,191• 6.5.V,CD42K e.,r On oil Semer I I FURNISH & INSTALL: '''Re's fit CLWOPc7E PA'ZIRI'T 8' TALL MASONRY V o SCREENING WALL -N 89'45'50° IF 184.47' FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSUREi, m el - Paul Wagner I ,I S -I II I CC No. 205141692 "' D.R.T.C.T. ec.. o, I Zoned Cl ., _ I LUD�Retail Commerical 1 I I h Case No. Attachment C ZA15-136 Page 1 . Project Narrative . SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING PLATTING CONSULTANTS, LLC iral LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE November 30,2015 Mr.Ken Baker Director of Planning&Development Services City of Southlake 1400 Main Street,Suite 310 Southlake,Texas 76092 RE: Donnie Ward Property—Site Plan Application Letter of Intent G&A Job No.15206 Mr.Baker: Please accept this letter, on behalf ATA Construction, as an explanation of the proposed Site Plan application for approximately .847 acres of land generally located at the southwest intersection of Kimball Avenue and Dove Road. The purpose of this application is to request Site Plan review and approval of the proposed 2 Story Commercial Building. The required parking and utility services have been provided for as shown on the attached submittal. If you have any questions please let us know. Sin-- - y, I stin L Lansdowne E.I.T. cc: Mr.Donnie Ward,ATA Construction Z:\2014\14105\PDFs> & Submittals\Zoning\2015.11.30 Southlake 1st Submittal\14105 ZDP LOI 111315.doc ReceiVe0 NOV 1 0 2015 Planning Del:. 111 Hillside Drive • Lewisville,TX 75(.57 • P:972.436.9712 • F:972.436.9715 144 Old Town Blvd.North,Suite 2 • Argyle,TX 76226 • P:940.240.1012 • F:940.240.1028 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-136 Page 2 Conceptual Elevations: • North Elevation • • • • • • III IIII EMIIIM IMIliti(11�!NUMMI!!I IIIIIIM1111llO111111il[11118111011111111111111 11111111116i1110111111111111ll111]I11d1111511111111 1111II111111 1111111111111I111111111111II U NORTH ELEVATION East Elevation ..�...r 111 111 IIIIHIIIIIIIIIIII lllllIHIllllllli I��IIIIIIIII Illu�ll pl Ip111111111111111111111111l11IIIIIIiIn11111111III111111111IIIlItl11113111MINMAIIllllfglllM((111III11i111( II1111111111f 111111lfll1ifig 11111111111111G111111III111111 thill111111IIIIi11IIIIII11111 111111IIIllII111111111IIIIllIIlO1111117f 1111111 EASTELEVATION Kffrg/S,PARK....0,1.15-1,re Case No. Attachment C ZA15-136 Page 3 • West Elevation • 111 II MEMO LI; 1,01 11111111111111111111111(111111111111IIIIIIIII11IIIIIIIIIIID111111111111illll11111111111111111111l(11111111111111(111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111llll11111111111111111111111m "I I � tllifilllil11�811�IIIlIIIIDilllilll�l�i iiilll�111ft1�tl11 _____ I I In III WEST ELEVATION ,0016.1101AT South Elevation 11iID111111111111111111111111111111111111111111M111111111111111IIIIIU1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111[1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111Hi11111111111111111111111111IIIIII11111111111111111111 SOUTH ELEVATION Case No. Attachment C ZA15-136 Page 4 Tree Preservation Plan • • .1--;,-•:4:-. .. z.,1ysa` . 1 - LEGEND . "a i'AI .L. • • I MEE TO OE MM. 1. t., I H ' -`e. 'I 2 i• J I d 1 .11r.�— \ I \ ti. ( . 1'i ' ! '' i 1,,,,l, ! ....---.',":::-' .--•.. -. :.'-'-...; l' I 1 I (I � TREE CHART • IT 1(:cu' I � ' -iii L Amort -+.I .1 I... C.M.n �� I I ;I J. 1 a mf re ee.wxw .mwoena m ti '::.1 11 '1 I 1'r I �.'' 1i I 'I I ���I:1,-,,-,1 --i I I /' . ,..,. v mnw.m .w..mu. .e .a / we_ ' /7: 1 i fl I! ,••,:-,,,,„ • 1 IIj4i •—J • • ;i '2. I.i __ ,, • ^ 1 11f + 1 I1 i i;1 I ...?."" '.°1...,'„�+ Tatty at.em_]Bees RE 1 I I'' i 1 I I I ,I f"�l of nWnq Rao weer m.LLa este—1,028 n1. (2h R ' 1 Mr..perc.b.of the ab.tree cover to be preserved 4 4110 s.f.(20X) S -`� I • / / I I ,i 1 coberg green.4 15B RE -,::: iF7 3 ::,-, iAil ef.ino)...!. .0. .,_r—li _ill L :.=1. . 1 4,..1L... i_ 1 ' t l'1, 'II 1 II 1 1111 I. i, • Case No. Attachment C ZA15-136 Page 5 Landscape Plan . • LEGEND • .. • �- iiii • y _ ... (Eo)u0E OAK 2 um. row, `-�. __._--z. NORTH O -) .RK E<N} n w m m . a N o« ... _sr d 3)o, (no)RFD OAK • 4110• 11111111.77f--1L s[ cos 7F 1 . ������0000w r'.'ItJL�t�OOC�p Q (WE)dMESE iSE.CNE ‘11"..- • • • • • ma Nor re YESS�i -1- • (NT)CHASTE TRfE rr r1z r �ri m (ux)DWARF INDIAN HAWTHORN r �- ow HAMM 272- gam (w)GULF MUM,suss rwm �' - wM°.r.rY .. r.......w.Yw ))Mawr ws.....r.1..1 wn.M.-...r.NwNw A .....,.�w.r Of.�Y.wa..4.104 (NC)DWARF NRICO GRASS .)i.-.++r�en�r�� ,nom - L 1/••••••al.Y•w Y.1...0••n..~ SRR • ).E .I,..wow.cow..An.ow.wa iww.w•w.umelam)low ...r.uw.r MI SEASONAL COLOR . )m EaQ..a _I . .. _ o: �No.........n a.4.1.•ft r..i..4 a.16+.41......sY T.amw BEIIIIUDA SOD : 4 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA15-136 Revised Review No.: Two Date of Reviews 01/19/15 Project Name: Site Plan —Ward Retail/Commercial Building APPLICANT: Justin L Lansdowne E.I.T. OWNER/DEVELOPER: Donnie Ward. G&A Consultants, LLC ATA Construction 144 Old Town Boulevard North, Suite 2 2010 E Dove Road Argyle, Texas 76226 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (940) 240-1012 Phone: (817) 988-0784 E-mail: Justin@gacon.com E-mail: ataconst@aol.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/21/15 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DAVID JONES AT (817) 748-8070. 1. Revise the height shown in the Site Data Summary Chart to reflect the height per the definition in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 4. The height is defined as the average height of the highest gable on a pitched roof. The height of the building appears to be approximately 32'. 2. Amend the Mutual Access Easement so that the legal description and map read lot 34 rather than lot 35. 3. The tree conservation plan does not conform to the Tree Preservation Ordinance,which requires any site with less than 20% of tree canopy cover to retain at least 70% of that cover. A variance request must be submitted with this application to allow removal of the existing trees in conjunction with the proposed development. 4. Section 43.13(4) requires horizontal building articulation for any non-single family residential building within a Residential Adjacency Overlay Zone. This articulation requirement applies whenever the length of a wall exceeds three (3) times its height. Using the provided scale, the wall height on the western wall is approx 20 feet tall from grade and approx 75 feet end to end. Section 43.13(4) requires a minimum offset or inset of 15% of wall height (approx 3 feet)for a distance equal to at least 25% of the length of either adjacent plane (approx 15 feet). Keep in mind the 4:1 slope required on the west building elevation if an offset is proposed. Fire Marshal Comments Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal (817) 748-8671 kclementsAci.southlake.tx.us Case No. Attachment D ZA15-136 Page 1 GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. No Comments at this time. Landscape Administrator Comments Keith Martin Landscape Administrator (817) 748-8229 kmartinAci.southlake.tx.us 1. The existing tree cover calculations were not provided on the Tree Conservation Plan but there are two (2) existing trees in the eastern middle portion of the lot. One is an Elm tree and the other is Cottonwood, and both are shown to be removed because they are within the building pad and south access drive. The only other trees actually on the lot are in the northwest corner of the property along the west property line. The rest of the trees shown on the Tree Conservation Plan are not on the developing property. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0— Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the the entire site existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% —20% 70% 20.1 —40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12' back-to-back if curbed or 13' edge-to-edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. 2. All parking planter islands in parking areas shall contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses or seasonal color. Planter islands which have light poles for lighting the parking areas may substitute two (2) understory/accent trees for the required canopy tree. Landscape area at the ends of a row of parking spaces are considered parking planter islands and must have the required canopy tree and associated plant material. Case No. Attachment D ZA15-136 Page 2 The parking planter islands within the overhead electrical utility easement cannot have canopy trees planted within them. Double and triple accent trees have been provided within the islands but a canopy tree must be provide within the east island of the parking spaces directly south of the building. 3. Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for required west and south bufferyard landscaping. The existing trees being taken credit for in the south bufferyard do not look to be fully on the developing property. In order to take existing tree credits for required development landscaping, the existing trees taken credit for must be growing on the developing property and be healthy condition. Only three(3)existing tree credits for canopy trees may be taken for the existing trees within the west bufferyard because only two (2) trees are actually within the bufferyard on the property. No existing tree credits may be taken for required plant material within the south bufferyard because none of the trees shown are within the south bufferyard or on the property. 4. Ensure that canopy trees are no planted directly under the overhead electrical and utility lines. The canopy trees on the north east corner of E. Dove and N. Kimball may need to be moved back a little on the property when planted. 5. The Landscape Summary Charts show that there are thirteen (13) canopy trees provided across the property but there are only twelve (12) shown. Three (3) additional canopy trees must be planted to meet the parking lot landscape requirements so additional trees could be placed on the property to meet the interior landscape and bufferyard requirements. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Engineering/Public Works Comments Steve Anderson, P.E. Civil Engineer (817) 748-8101 sandersonsouthlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. No Comments At This Time. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre- construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. Case No. Attachment D ZA15-136 Page 3 t A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No, 836. *=Denotes informational comment. General Informational Comments The following should be informational comments only * Staff strongly recommends contacting Daniel Cortez in the City Manager's Office to schedule a SPIN meeting. Daniel can be contacted by phone at (817) 748-8029 or by e-mail at dcortezna ci.southlake.tx.us. A copy of the SPIN meeting schedule is attached. * Section 20.2 restricts the use of cleaners, laundries and/or Laundromats to a floor area not exceeding 2,500 square feet. Take-out restaurants and restaurants with drive-through service are prohibited in the C-1 zoning district. * Per section 43.13, standing seam metal roofs shall be constructed of a factory-treaded, non- metallic, matte finish. * The Development Review Committee (DRC) has determined this pre-submittal is sufficient for formal submittal to the Planning and Zoning Commission subject to completing the changes noted above. If any significant changes, other than those noted above are made to the submittal, the plan could be withheld from processing until a later meeting or remanded back to the Development Review Committee for review. Please note that in accordance with resolution of the Southlake City Council, a complete submittal may still be subject to continuation to a later meeting date of Planning and Zoning Commission if the Commission receives a high overall volume of applicant requests for hearing. Case No. Attachment D ZA15-136 Page 4 4 Surrounding Property Owners 1 I i I , f s 1 E coy A-- E I i9.540 tI Oat 199 J i----____ �..� t- lW : I ' - W i 1 I 1 SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. Thomas Decaro SF1A 2080 E Dove Road 7.565 NR 2. Pamela D Long SF1A 2117, 2150 E Dove Road 4.031 NR 3. Rickey McPherson Cl 2180, 2190 E Dove Road 3.713566 NR 4. Paul Wagner SF1A 1480, 1620 N Kimball Avenue 2.758699 F 5. Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR 6. City of Grapevine 1 NR Responses: F: In Favor 0: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: (6) Responses Received: (1) Case No. Attachment F ZA15-136 Page 1 4C-- Notification Response Form ZA15-136 Meeting Date:January 7, 2016 at 6:30 PM WAGNER, PAUL 1480 NORTH KIMBALL AVE SOUTHLAKE,TX 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: 44 , // / Date: l Z 3D 2D15 v, Additional Signature: t n 04:1%1)` ,_' I / Date: 1 171206- \ Printed Name(s): PW( I mil pi; I i�a, UlnegMust be property owner(s)whose names)are prin d•t top. Othe Ise contact the Planning ment. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): ° ! ) q55-3396 Case No. Attachment F ZA15-136 Page 2 J o- \N 1 I ` I ��"w i I Pr r Q Ton I / \/ ,\\ ce / O 'n W F ` II'..„I... ix U � � ��► \ �', V" ifs c LEGEND v, Li Vit.. 124 �I %� 7// Q I_' 'I, 6 z . .1ii 0 : .1 ,, A 'Ilithb / 1 I/o I/ - 04 `Uy 1J m �NE '` ^// /ob/ F g TREE To BE REMOVED 14.1 c \` `� e w'o'th R o NORTH z _ \. I ` ____ . . Ro�)q p 1 RITCAL ROOT ZONE 20 0 20 40 60 Feet W Illkitits _-- SCALE:1'.20. iliac . 1 \ , \,\-, \ \ __ . ,,, . / TREE TO BE SAVED \ EX ASPHALT // 1 • Ail _. , ... , ,, .......... • ..„ 1,..,, , \ \ I h / TREE PRUNING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION MEASURES _ I ` ( \\\� - - A. OUAUTY ASSURANCE N \ \ I 1 , \\\ \ / 11 Canply with opplicaDle Fetlerol,state,county and localegulatims governing lantlscape work. Z \ / I / 2 Employ only experienced penonnd. Provide adequate paviaion by qualified I«emon. O B. JOB CONDITIONS`\ I 1 \ ? III p\ Q 666((( / 1) MULCH: Double shredded hardwood mulch free of slicks,dirt and other debris as derived fresh\ q.—11 1 \ InI—I / I t least 7 feel from the trunk or 2/3 the distance to the dripline,whichever Is greater. w U N m I I 1 G 1 \ t 2) TPZ: Tree Protection Zone: The entire soil space located directly under the tlripline of any tree t/^M<.c Q O z III I 1 / o� 1 (me Ike eripfine). under the ON I of tree and an n N --...•63..,, I I I II �! \ \ • 3) CRS,Complete Root d said The soil space directlypineanyZ J c} 0 I I I I • I ZL� \ additional 7 feet beyond id driplme. .-W W II I '''''''.'6 O 4)TPF: Tree Protection Fence: The nge safety barrier netting that shall extend around the entire I I , ) 'i q "�� / TREE CHART circumference of tree al PZ. z 1 7 / L {^aTO�\ E. PRE—CONSTRUCTION TREE PRUNING CL O }Q 1 I 1) Pciety Ar Oudifiure(IS:All pruning Mall De Performed ands me wPaNiaion of an International 0 i M 1 / / / \ / Society Arboriculture(ISA)Certified Arborist. I e,y TREE CA11PE111') COMMON NAME BOlANKAL NARK PROTECTED REMOVED 2 All trees within me t area Mall be pruned to: 0 Uel' ,70.0' , / / ( c Y > Praia .prone .. CC D_11367 13 MACONM reins occidentalis es No Clear the crown of diseased.crossing,weak and dead wood to a minimum of 1 1f inches Q j/ — I 2 1366 7 HAMER. Celds«cidentalis yesNa ver ver 0 T/P_ II / / \ 6) Provide a feet of ertiaal deoranae o atneeg ana a fort o sidewalks.F4, 3 1377 26 AMERICAN ELM Ulmus Ameriana Yes Ya Remove scuba.culfi�gounitle[he waanawooe baea<toot M1aa rarrned around the booth. cr, 1 / CC 11 1 / / / I / %or TO \\ 4 1378 25 COTTONWOOD Popuws dehmeee Yes yes iv)branches. end weight r heavy,horizontal branches by xlecUvdy removing Id9 small diameter I // t than 2 to 3 inches,near the ends of the scaffolds. LL: 101 I/ / \ \ 3) Pruning cuts stroll be made in accordance with ANSI 300 Pruning Standard and work shall be I I I I I I \ performed;n ace«donce with ANSI 2133.1 Sorety Standard. Pruning shall be in accordance with L� I I /r / / 7T I. ISA's Best Management Practices: Tree Pruning / /E �j//// * / \\\ �/ / a) Bm«ell 20 paden of live folsh;ti sprlead underneath treesywithin the tree protection zone / 3. I s) Brush Mall be chipped and chips Mall be too maximum depth of 6 inches,leaving the trunk clear of mulch. / I I ,a /'�, 1 I I '.MI I F. TREE REMOVAL pnese commitmentas as gr'' //I I '--I-- 1) Tr pre eruption requires a to preserving and maintaining retained trees, well / I I l� _ / Iremoval of any unwilea nen.item me Project Meo. W 1 t . I AI / 2) All wood debris from all tree removals at the Project Ste Is to be chipped and stared on site for Z 1 I ( rn / / _. {� :1:1 a on site in the tree preservation efforts at me discretion of the Landscape Architect. / /a z I I I _ aim P 3) me limits of all tree protection Zathe Mall De slaked lone fide and obaervetl Dy all contract«s. W{ Any brush clearing required within the tree protection z e Mall be accomplished with hand NI I I /E Q3 a operated ebcTemno one WI / 5) Trees to be ved horn within the tree protection z shall be removed under the supervision0 /I / I \ I w 1 \ of Certified Arborist. The trees Mall De cut near ground level and the slump ground out. /�1I II / / I 1. G. TREE PROTECTIONLi/ /I I 2 G I I / / \ 1) Before beginningn work,m<Project Manaeger,Landscape Archilectcesd/or Owner or their aegoenls 1 I h / \ I ere required tosr set t the Bite to revi w all work procedures,a ss routes,storage a e and tree Z \ protection mea s. oMy intended construction activities inside the TPZ Mau be uipme outlined. / Ix — ' 1 / I \I 12) Fences shall be rmected to protect trees to be preserved prior to construction equipment arriving o O I / ' / IA I the Project Site. Fences will define the specific protection zone f«cock tree or group trees. n }/ / / / / h I Fences ore to be Fentdned and rema until all site work hos been completed antl final londscopeW/ I I1 / / I \ I operations begin. Fences may not be relocated«removed without written permission from the / I I / ` / I I \ 1) Landscape Architect. Fences may be constructed from 6' Y slake and orange web fence ` Q / / �// / _ _�� 71 4. I�_ S I 'I 1 I \ 1 EXISTING TREE COVER CALCULATIONS material. / �V �� 2)All trees to be preserved shall hove 6 inches of hardwood mulch applied inside the tree protection --._ / I \ one. This hardwood mulch Mall be replenished as necessary to aintdn a 6;inch depth. / I / I I I / I / 10'P an t, tility. \ •VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR REMOVAL OF TREES 3.&4, 3) Conatructlan Kaden,name and storage areae must rem bide fenced area at an times. I I e TTY 4) Tree roots extentl out in a straign[,radial directim Kan the tree much like spokes on a wheel(to n CL 1 / I 1 I I/ / Ea r nage t 02111431!2 all \ Total site area-36,R95 a.f. a depth generally not exceeding 24').All of line.and utillNea and drain«irrigation lines Mall be / I I/ / �� / I I over on routed outside me tree vmlecti« e. Ir fines must traYase me vralectiw na,mey shall be Percent of existi tree c en Ore site r 1,029 s.f. (2%) N W / 1 / I / 1' /� n9 tunneled technologyaana<,me tree. Trench n akdug'with Air Spade(registered trademark) W /V/�� / I I Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserves- •720 s.f.(70%) or similar yeecep ore's m y any p / / / I / /1 / I I S/ Tree cover being preserved— 156 S.(. bees. Irrigation lneslin;de the Erip ne maustub dInna straighttioaalal 3rdecton%warns theetreeed LLJ Z /m / / _ I / I / trunk and terminate in a dead end sprinkler head no greater than 7 feet frau a tree trunk. / / / / I --I — —/ —— —/ ——'—— L u __� / / (irrigation lines shall not in any way bisect and therefore damage the spoke—like'root system). 0 I a /IL 5) No materials,equipment,spoil,or waste or washout water may be deposited,stored,«parked / l z un i I / L li, I l I wimp me tree Protection zone. �, ,` ( / "7 m / 1 f/I \ 6) If unintentional entiohl Injury shouldsccur to any tree during construction,can it shall be reported to the V / / / r D / l Imo'\r,4 r ' IX I • Landscape Architect cue in six hours so that remedial action can be taken. Timelinesstth iscritical / / N X10 IN ,,,, ) to tree health. The coat of any reined;el treernenta will became the burden of the offending 7 M ^'1 " ��LD_G '.. _ �. \ _ I _ I I 65'B- contracting company. Dto to / l SETBACK CAE • I� a _ _ -- a ai—H 1 l• I Ex 1 7)Any grading,construction.demdilion,or other work that is expected to encounter tree roots moat / / IBU R�A� / / / 0 I OWM I be monitored by the Landscape Architect. Specific locations or tree tag numbers Mould be J J -- a 1 identified. / // i / // / / t\ 1 I / / 1 y/ / / / I / �I 1'�-EX.CONCRETE TREE DRIP LINE___. NS VI l I 1 • 1 / / / I 1 / I I �',1 \ I Rte( •w go RETE,10N, l I / l / / / I / // I \ 1 M�N P 15 F \OR t,,.•., g\ I I 1 // ('// // // I ?g€-\--` •617 / I liIJ W NDOING•Ovt ART V'NOr"'Pi a0 J`!=1 I - I I / re 1 0 40 /\817.016 lags N� ^\79, Qy r '.FOFte' . i?I;:;%'::�- :;;:illi%3i` Drown BY. • INFRL FENCE w 6•OF CNS Jiii' 1 Date: 1(30 2015 • " "' / Scale:1-20 Revisions: 6'en.-r STAKE 12/21/2015 f 8/2016 l :4 ..;.;::#:?'•.. .....' :::3 • •�•Pusnc SAFETY . FEWE IC , NOTE. I•OC Oa'RNT.SECURET W/WIRE TREE PROTECTOR FENCE RUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE C— - CONSTRUCTION BEGINSANY GRADING pt TOPGU WIREUSECURE C LANDSCAPE ANY ORK TIC le I PRESENT BNCE TO lily WIRE ALSO • • TEEN ANY WORK IS NCE. WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION FENCE. `. • y TREE PROTECTION OWNFR/DEVELOPER 15206W DONNIE W. WARD 2010 E. DOVE ROAD SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 Ph. (817)988-0784 Contact: Donnie W. Ward L2.0 ?i5 NY