The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7B CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT September 29, 2015 CASE NO: ZA15-084 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Diyar Eco Estates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Diyar Estates is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Diyar Eco Estates from "SF-2" Single Family Residential District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District to develop four residential lots and two open space lots on approximately 3.079 acres described as Lot 1 R, Block 2, East Haven Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 1021 E. Continental Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "SF- 2" Single Family Residential District. Proposed Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN Neighborhood #9. DETAILS: Diyar Estates is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Diyar Eco Estates from the current "SF-2" Single Family Residential District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District to develop four (4) residential lots and two (2) open space lots on approximately 3.079 acres. The proposed development includes a community garden and an approximately 450 square foot greenhouse for the use of the residents. The existing wall around the property that was built by the previous property owner will remain. At the September 3, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant presented a plan proposing five (5) residential lots and one (1) open space lot, which was located across the southern portion of the property. At the direction of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant revised the plan by reducing the number of residential lots from 5 to 4 and creating an additional open space to preserve an existing water well and 28" pecan tree in the northwest corner of the property. The greenhouse and community garden that were on an open space lot at the southern portion of the property were relocated to the newly created open space lot at the northwest corner of the property. The three residential lots on the west side of the cul-de-sac were shifted to the south. One of the two lots originally proposed on the east side of the cul-de-sac was removed and the open space lot in the tree preservation area on the southeast portion of the property has been enlarged. As a result of the revisions, the open space area increased from approximately 0.525 acres (17%) to approximately 0.73 acres (24%). The gross density decreased from 1.62 units per acre to 1.3 units per acre and the minimum lot size increased from 10,000 square feet to 15,000 square feet. The maximum lot coverage decreased from 45% to 40% and the side yard setbacks increased from 5' to 7.5'. Due to the configuration of Lot 4 as a panhandle lot, which is prohibited by the Subdivision Ordinance, a regulation was added to allow the lot to be configured as shown. Case No. ZA15-084 The site data and development regulations proposed are as follows: Site Data Summary Number of Residential Lots 4 Number of Open Space Lots 2 Gross Acreage 3.079 Gross Density 1.3 du/acre Open Space Acreage 0.73 Open Space Percentage 24% Development • •ns (Compared to 1A Base Zoning) SF-20A Proposed R-PUD Front Yard 35' 15' Setback Side Yard7.5' Setback 15' 20' adjacent to E. Continental Blvd. Rear Yard 40' 15' Setback 35' on cul-de-sac Maximum Lot 30% 40% Coverage Minimum Lot 20,000 sq. ft. 15,000 sq. ft. Area Min. width - 100' Min. width - 100' Lot Dimensions Min. depth - 125' Min. depth - 100' Panhandle Lot Not Permitted Permitted for Lot 4 Private gated Not permitted in new subdivisions Not Permitted street Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, does not allow private streets in new subdivisions in which less than 75% of the lots contain homeowner occupied structures. The applicant originally proposed an R-PUD regulation to allow a private gated street. The Planning and Zoning Commission removed the private gated street as a permitted use in their motion for approval at the September 17, 2015 meeting. The applicant has revised the R-PUD regulations to state that a private gated street is not permitted. ACTION NEEDED: Consider 1St reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) SPIN Meeting Report dated August 11, 2015 (E) Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated September 11, 2015 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480-703 (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Case No. ZA15-084 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: 809 Partners APPLICANT: Diyar Estates PROPERTY SITUATION: 1021 E. Continental Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 R, Block 2, East Haven Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "SF-2" Single Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: -The property was annexed into the City in 1982 and - An amended plat (ZA07-059) for Lots 1 R-1 5R and 17R-21 R, East Haven Addition was filed December 3, 2007. -A Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA07-058) from "AG" Agricultural and "I-1" Light Industrial to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development was approved by City Council on June 17, 2008. -A Plat Revision (ZA08-73) for Lots 7R1, 8R1, 8R2, 20R1 & 21 R1, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, East Haven Addition was approved by City Council on November 13, 2008 and filed January 28, 2010. -A Zoning Change and Concept/Development Plan (ZA11-015) from R- PUD Residential Planned Unit Development District to R-PUD Residential Planned Unit Development District and SF-2 Single Family Residential District to remove Lot 1 R, Block 2, East Haven Addition from the existing East Haven Residential Planned Unit Development and to rezone that lot to SF-2 Single Family Residential District was approved by City Council August 2, 2011. -An Amended Plat for Lot 1 R, Block 2, East Haven Addition was approved December 1, 2010 and filed February 6, 2011. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for this project on August 11, 2015 at Southlake Town Hall. A SPIN Meeting Report is included as Attachment "D" of this report. SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use ¢F �TE The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan E CONTIN ENTAL6LV� designates this property as Medium Density Residential. As proposed, this ARL°\ No development is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan. The image to the right ER C o illustrates the Future Land Use for the oe Nae.,ae Case No. Attachment A ZA15-084 Page 1 proposed location. Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan shows E. Continental Blvd. to be a two-lane undivided collector with 84' of right of way. Adequate right of way was dedicated by a previous plat. Pathways/Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan shows existing sidewalks on both sides of E. Continental Blvd. adjacent to the site. A 5' sidewalk exists on the south side of E. Continental Blvd. A 4' sidewalk along both sides of the proposed internal street is shown on the Development Plan as is required by Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.06(B). The proposed internal sidewalks are required to be connected to the existing sidewalk on E. Continental Blvd. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions This location proposes one street access onto E. Continental Blvd. E. Coninental Blvd. (26) (between S. Carrol Blvd and Byron Nelson Pkwy.) 24hr East Bound (5,786) West Bound (6,235) AM Peak AM (899)7:30—8:30 AM Peak AM (436)7:30—8:30 AM PM Peak PM (390)3:30—4:30 PM Peak PM (918)4:45—5:45 PM *Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Trak Count Report Traffic ImpacUnits t pd* AM- AM- PM_ PM_ itsIN OUT IN OUT Single-Family Detached 4 38 1 2 3 1 Housing(210) * Vehicle Trips Per Day •AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday •Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7t"Edition UTILITIES: The proposed water line to serve the development will tie into an existing 12" water line in E. Continental Blvd. The development will be served by an existing 8" sanitary sewer service at the southern end of the development. TREE PRESERVATION: Tree Conservation Plan shows that there is 18% existing tree cover on the site and 80.26% of the existing tree cover is shown to be preserved. The previous plan at the September 3rd P&Z meeting showed 69.3% of the existing tree cover is to be preserved. If the case was a straight zoning district, the Tree Preservation Ordinance would require that 70% of existing tree cover be preserved. For property sought to be zoned R-PUD, the City Council shall consider the application for a Tree Conservation Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application. PLANNING AND ZONING Case No. Attachment A ZA15-084 Page 2 COMMISSION ACTION: September 17, 2015; Approved (6-0) as presented subject to the staff report dated September 11, 2015 and Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated September 11, 2015, specifically noting that the private gated street is not permitted under this application, removing mesquite trees a permitted tree type, noting the applicant's willingness to address with staff any new incremental drainage impacts resulting from this development, noting the applicant's willingness to have the builder present at the City Council meeting and noting that the applicant will reach out to the members of the community that previously expressed opposition to the application but that the applicant is stating are now in favor and having that updated fully in time for the City Council meeting at 1 st reading. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated September 11, 2015. Case No. Attachment A ZA15-084 Page 3 Vicinity Map 1021 E. Continental Blvd. c� 80r p2 r r �L 2p0 Co00 1050 w6�y 1 723 733 (A °' 1201 Q 731 N 729 121 121 12101208 900 9p2 W 720 722 727 12 �% 904 m 9 21 23 725 1218 1211 209 1207 907 903 905 1220 800 0 n a � N N 1199 r N R Fr--- C-4 N R. o 1240 N� h( m 18 720 22 0 T m N ARLOW C7 TMON N 19 N N 12 NDN1400 ^� 1318021312 o m m_ Rns 804 N N o N oN 1308 8:1 { 07 806 N N 12 C ` � iv 1304 140 1150 1160 1170 1203 �YY SON PKvVy, - Q m_ 808 1166 X205 ��i 15�6 N 7S2 r T 2 81 810 O`co S rs 37 CN, $ �6 �3r , Cdr 1201 h 1608 rn o 801 �3?3 �.�� 1612 o� h 1616 803 $pI 7425 1501 1503 NO �`�� 805 162o � W 1430 1200 1624 N 1202 ZA15-084 Zoning Change and 5 Development Plan r' 0 200 400 800 1,200 Feet V 1 Case No. Attachment B ZA15-084 Page 1 Plans and Support Information Proposed Development Standards Residential Planned United Development District- Land Use and Development Regulations for the 3.079 acre development known as Diyar Eco Estates Southlake, Texas This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it pertains to the "SF-20A" Single- Family Residential zoning district and the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following exceptions: Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than seven and half (7.5) feet. There shall be a side yard of not less than twenty (20) feet adjacent to E. Continental Blvd. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding forty percent (40%) of the lot area. Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. Lot Dimensions: Each lot shall have a minimum width of one hundred (100) feet, as measured at the front building line and a minimum depth of one hundred (100) feet. Open Space Lot: A greenhouse shall be permitted on the open space lot with a maximum footprint of 15' x 30' and located as shown on the development plan. The greenhouse shall not encroach in the 15' rear yard. Lot 4 Residential Panhandle Lot A residential panhandle lot, also known as a flag lot, shall be permitted for Lot 4 as shown on the development plan. The configuration of this lot serves to protect the existing floodplain and other natural environmental features of the adjacent open space lot. The area and width of the buildable area of Lot 4 with comply with the zoning regulations established herein, not including the panhandle portion of said lot. Lot 4 will also provide, at a minimum, for emergency access and fire protection standards of the adopted city codes. The location of the panhandle lot conforms to the City's Driveway Ordinance, No. 643, as amended. Case No. Attachment C ZA15-084 Page 1 A private gated street shall NOT be allowed. Diyar Eco Estates Open Space Management Plan All Common Open Space shall be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA), to be established for the development. All other areas shall be the responsibility of the individual property owners, including the front yards and required streetscape trees of the residential lots. All property owners shall be required to be a member of the HOA. Dues assessments, required for the maintenance of the common areas and other HOA activities, shall be mandatory. The HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance and operation of the protected open space within the development. The expenses required to maintain the common areas at a quality level shall be estimated annually by the HOA Board, and dues shall be determined and assessed on each property owner in an equitable fashion at such a rate as necessary to maintain such a level of quality. Authority to enforce these requirements, and to place a lien on the property if such dues are not paid, shall be in the form of written Deed Restrictions and Covenants, agreed to by all property owners at purchase, and shall run with the land. Provisions shall be made, in the HOA bylaws and Deed Restrictions, that in the unlikely event the HOA fails to maintain all or a portion of the protected open space in reasonable order and condition, the City of Southlake may, but is not required to, assume responsibility for its maintenance and take corrective action, including the provision of extended maintenance. The costs of such maintenance may be charged to the HOA or individual property owners that make up the HOA, and may include administrative costs and penalties which shall become a lien on all property in the development. Case No. Attachment C ZA15-084 Page 2 Development Plan NT't E. CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD Water well saved T.O.W.oD21 MOM E Greenhouse and community garden relocated -WT.NO. o.P.R.r.c.r ROAD CENTERLINE II.. RIONS WAS CURB RAMP PER b SN sCN00L 20N 42'7 N89-38'04- 25 . 61 CITY STANDAR 1----�--- --- - 119.5' I I 42.171 Tj 12 NL EX. WEX 5'WALK TOR MAIN MASONRY WALL IX.I W15OMY .a.o:m - Nrte A.T� e1 I I I tR I '® ,,.,..... CURB RAMP PER — IX0 c CITY STANDARDS ZONING,r,t*/ 'R O I 0.16 AC. E 35'BINLDING LRE L.U.D.:MEOAAN DENSITY I 6,919 SF. I I INSTNDq TICT RESIDENT/AL DDT31 TO REMAON MASONRY WALL I PROP.OPEN APPROX.LOCATION Q a to SPACE D I OF GREENHOUSE 114 - 6 KL.SEANZONING RPUD TY EX.WATER WELL �2.7� L.U.D.:SCENTI DENSITY I 7s'IUE TMD I 0.46 AC. B.I RESIDE7/T/AL 20,056 SF. I E, I --tea I i y I fit:I !I•Bre I zR I n 5o•k.o.w. LOT IR, BLOCK 2 I I +� EAST HAVEN ADDITION srEPNEN 6 AuruNN BEDFORD I 0.35 AC. Q INST.NO.D211037986 / ZONING:MN I I 15,318 sF. o� p O.P.R.TC.T. a' 809 PARTNERS, LP I It.u.o.:MED11TIAL o Irr I SI R£Sp£lyr/AL INST.N0.D21027360I I I I F I O.P.R.T.C.T. St W h I 1 I ��I�8:1 IM y �--I +� 7.0'!GE TMD q 101 y Z2 VEERAPALLI VANAJAKSN 3'193'1 ZONMG:MN 7. / p L.U.D.:AEDAANDENSITY '� / I al I I RESIDENT/AL i �� p 0 OI P O W PALLA#ADOEN 1 I �I L.U.D O D DENSITY 1 t- -_ __ I _ \ R50.5'B/C / IREs nAL lad I ! w i I I I'3 I 10.10,49%, yy ,NIA a N`N SHPESTH4 IR 7 ]7 I I Z«wID'MN L.U.D. � r i :MEDIAN DENSITY / I I I RESVENTIAL I I PROP1 15'\ p ICY DRAINGfI\ESM[.w � i� I L I I 5X I ForsBEra—7.5.5pE TMD � � ' 24,767 SF. � / I ---------- R- I I I I SR I I —7 5' YAW I I PROP.OPEN ' f I (/SPACE LOT JAMES R.MARLENMH L.U.D INUMN DENSITY 100FTAPPROX.L ON pr /VV I I I I I 26,313 SF. �100 FT II I � I I I PROP. I ' II �`.`�,. / Mq EzEMAr I 6R g UTILITY�ESMT. I I� R./: U.D.:MEDAAN DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ' I I MARK A SCIU TE �{/ ZON/NGS AA4 I W B: --- /IOT 12RRI,BLOCK 2 1 / TMOAPON MXM ON L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY NMTLYMANOR.2.B RESIDENTIAL R'MJ/i / CAB.A,SL.9209 15'M.M.WE I / P.R.T.C.T. EX.MASONRY WALL NST.NO.D210020]31 I "` 1R.A. 1 —J DRAFTED ROM TO REMAIN o .B.T ��' CAB.A,$L.4517 r—Ln. FENCE /T-"TS LOT]RI,BLOCKI 1- --- PA TRICK 8 BRITTANY WORE NN::RPUD EAST NAVBN MX%TON L.U.. .D.:MEDAANDENSIrY S89°30'2RES— I 2'W 254.66' INST.N0.D210020T31 / Case No. Attachment C ZA15-084 Page 3 Tree Conservation Plan CONTINENTAL BLVD. — ----- ,�,1---� IJ SN SCHOOL ZONE —rte w� II GPllp.T- IIIII 28" pecan tree saved y �� M I 3 v f oo � I I sNED` I % $ I I • I I 25' ---'ga— �9r I j i o i j 'y jso� rn j ]R j I 25 I I 50' I I fi0, I ``\\ i----- � II TREE PRESERVATION I SITE AREA 134 132 sf ^'�^^ ; I I EXISTING TREE COVERAGE TOTAL TREE COVERAGE 24,019 sf Nt� 18% of total site y^� TREE PRESERVATION (70%preservatlon required) I � . L EXISTING TREES PRESERVED 19,279 sf �'l--g I (80.26% of existing tree coverage) EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED 4,740 sf �// i ;�• (19.74% of existing tree coverage) I N o I I I J I I • N g I l I s I m 2- IVC PIPE I 1 SW I \ / p MIRE FENCE W/T 0575 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-084 Page 4 ZISOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN2015-25 Planning Case Number: ZA15-084 Project Name: Diyar Eco Estates Southlake SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN # 9 Meeting Date: August 11, 2015 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Thirty-four (34) Host: Sherry Berman, Community Engagement Committee Applicant(s) Presenting: Jean Robb, Project Manager; et al three (3) City Staff Present: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I City Staff Contact: Richard Schell, Principal Planner—817.748.8602 or rschell ci.southlake.tx.us Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.citVofsouthlake.com and clicking on "Learn More" under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY Property Situation: • 1021 Continental Boulevard Development Details: • Promotional video was shown introducing the project— https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4- FulWu91XI&feature=youtu.be • Zoning change and development plan proposed for five (5) single-family homes on approximately three (3) acres. Requested zoning: R-PUD Residential Planned Unit Development District with SF-20A as a baseline. Current zoning: SF-2 Single Family Residential District, minimum 2-acre lot size. • The plan consists of three (3) '/4 acre sites and two (2) '/2 acre sites. Homes price point at approximately $1.5 million. • Some amenities include: development guidelines, electric car charging stations, water conservation, solar roof tiles, food forest, community garden and greenhouse. Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 1 Exhibits presented a Fiere'r route creotive woyr we tort Itelp tFte Ftorrte 1-1 4VIN IN Poll, LM WWI 7 Case buyer liven 2reerter IiRe. `\fir•�� --i".a > >�- '�� 4�.1�r �� lolor RooF Tiler or fftr�c ler ore aq option Tubulor rkyli2htr ore ideol wflert it corrLer to Iic�Flti rnloll rpocer or flow obout folor - ` �orleled Verortdor or Potion? 11 L •� Electric Vehicle CI�or2ir�c Itetiortf Int fill Ftonter Ulat�r Cortrervatiort •-y a �� __ u> SII hortter will be required to Have roirtbarrelr ort all 2utterr �»�; I olo witftTeNar Qotive Plagtr i�`�"• ":r� nr builder Ingdreape pnckn2er i; ;�--, For water cortfervatioR �� • . Attachment D ZAl 5-070 ' . • - Corgrqurtity Garden aqd Food Forert FOOD FOREST GROUNDCOVER IIS C Reridegtr will enjoyCorgrgugity Greeghoure.Corgrgunim Gordegogd Food Forert. Builds curtorg and productiog horger ig the Dollar,Fort Worth For over 15 yearn, lTOJEBROOItBuilderr award wiggirtc productr agd conInjurptier oPPer the bent irl innovative deriari,ereerl built Peaturer agd rolid value Por the dircrirtprlatirlc buyer. r B t2 ii land (Iflalyrir Factory to conrider ve ; e� QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: • How many houses? o Five total... we initially proposed six but reduced our number to five. • Will they be two-story? o The homes will be custom built and situated on each lot. Buffers will be installed to ensure they will be mutually beneficial. • How much will they cost? o 1.5 million to 2 million for the larger lots. • What is the requested zoning? o R-PUD with SF-20A base. • This looks congested... will there be on-street parking? By code? o Yes.. we will meet the 32 foot width requirement. • Who made the change from 6 houses to 5? o We talked with City Planning and 6 houses weren't going to work. • Will you be asking for variances? o We plan to follow the SF-20A regulations with exception to the setbacks, which are too restrictive, that is why we are requesting R-PUD to make it work. • This is a lot of housing in a small area with limited parking space. o We feel this is the highest and best use of the property. • Where did you come up with the comps for The Haven? o We looked at appraisals. • 1 want it on record that I am totally opposed. • The homes will be wide but not deep with a small front yard and little parking. o The homes will have 3-4 car garages. • What if the resident has a party? o They will likely valet off-site. • Will there be solar panels? o We are working on it concurrently. There are great new ways to have solar that isn't as noticeable as traditional panels. • Density is a huge issue in Southlake. o We feel like we have addressed the issue with '/4 and '/2 acre lot sizes. • How many square feet are the homes? Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 4 o Not less than 4,500 (estimate)... likely 5,000+ square feet... square footage will be market driven. • Will you be changing the wall around the property? o No, we like the wall. • Is it privacy gated? o We are working on it with the city... the city doesn't want it. • This is way too much house — high density. • You are proposing a 15 foot rear setback? o Yes, that is part of the negotiation. • Clarify the building line — 5,000 square feet seems like a lot and will result in 2-story which will peer into neighbors' property. I am concerned about setbacks. I am worried about solar panels. o We are not sure what we will be doing yet; we want them to be marketable. • Debate continued regarding cost / setback/ marketability o Carillon is selling successfully; we feel this will be very marketable. o Our site plan will be available Friday. The '/4 acre lots will be on the west side and the '/2 acre lots on the east side. Meeting adjourned 6:48 PM SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes;rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials,City staff,and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 5 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA15-084 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 09/11/15 Project Name: Development Plan - Diyar Eco Estates APPLICANT: Ahmed Hussein ENGINEER: Randy Eardley, P.E. Diyar Estates Wier & Associates, Inc. 2504 Glacier, Irving 701 Highlander Blvd. Ste. 300 Irving, TX 75062 Arlington, TX 76015 Phone: (972) 814-6248 Phone: (817) 467-7700 Fax: E-mail:randye@wierassociates.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 09/11/15 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602. 1. Lot 4 is configured as a panhandle lot, which is prohibited by Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01(K). The applicant has added an R-PUD regulation to allow Lot 4 to be configured as a panhandle lot. 2. Show, label and dimension the width of the right of way and traveled roadway on or adjacent to the site. Dimension the distance from the centerline to each property corner on E. Continental Blvd. and the full width dimension to the properties across the street. Show and dimension the full width of the right of way to the Wyndsor Grove green space lot adjacent to E. Continental Blvd. and not to the lots north of the green space. Show and label the green space lot on all plans. 3. Provide sidewalks and/or trails in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended and the Master Pathways Plan. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all public and private streets platted or replatted after the effective date of the Subdivision Ordinance. The sidewalks are required to be at least 2' from back of curb, but the Landscape Administrator recommends at least 4' from back of curb to avoid irrigation issues. A 5' sidewalk exists on the south side of E. Continental Blvd. A 4' sidewalk along both sides of the proposed internal street is shown on the Development Plan as is required by Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.06(B). The proposed internal sidewalks are required to be connected to the existing sidewalk on E. Continental Blvd. 4. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. 5. Rain barrels up to 100 gallons are allowed as an accessory use in residential districts (see below). The applicant is proposing to meet the accessory requirements below, so an R-PUD regulation to allow rain barrels is not required. Verify that all rain barrels can meet the regulations below, especially with regard to the rain barrels not being visible from the street. Add a regulation if any of the requirements below cannot be met. Rain barrels Case No. Attachment E ZA15-084 Page 1 • Maximum Size: Less than 100-gallon per barrel and 250-gallon system *Anything above 100-gallons or 250-gallon system would be considered an Above Ground Rainwater Cisterns • Maximum Height: 6-feet • Location: Anywhere not visible from right-of-way • Other Requirements - • No signage shall be permitted on the rain barrel where it is visible to the public from the right-of-way • The property owner shall ensure the rain water collection system does not become a source of water for pests, such as mosquitoes; Ensure the collection system is built in a manner that prevents openings to the system that would encourage pests and can be inspected by the applicant on a frequent basis for breaks, tears or other openings that could allow pests to enter the container. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The existing tree preservation complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The six (6) trees proposed to be removed are four (4) Chinaberry, One (1) Cottonwood, and one (1) Mulberry. The submitted Tree Conservation Plan shows that the property contains 18% of existing tree cover, and 70% of that existing tree cover is required to be preserved. 19.74% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be removed and 80.26% is proposed to remain. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the the entire site existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% -20% 70% 20.1 -40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the Case No. Attachment E ZA15-084 Page 2 zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. 4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. 5. Sanitary sewer services are to be located in the center of each lot with the water service located 10-ft upstream of the sewer service. 6. Sidewalks shall be required to be constructed with each dwelling. 7. Label curb return radius for the proposed drive. Curb return radii for driveways shall be 30' minimum. Right of way for residential streets is 50' with curb and gutter section equal to 31' B/B. Bar ditches are not allowed per Ordinance No. 312 Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. Case No. Attachment E ZA15-084 Page 3 Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot— not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER COMMENTS: 2. Minimum size for water lines is 8". 3. Locate water main 6-ft behind back-of-curb. 4. Locate water services 10-ft upstream of sanitary sewer service which should be located at the center of each lot. 5. Single family residential developments require fire hydrant spacing of 400' maximum for non- sprinkled residences or 600' for sprinkled residences. 6. Is lot 3X going to need water for irrigation? Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 7. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8". Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary sewer system built to City standards. 8. Proposed sanitary sewer shall be located in parkway - not under pavement, except for crossings. Case No. Attachment E ZA15-084 Page 4 9. Sanitary sewer services are to be located in the center of each lot with the water service located 10-ft upstream of the sewer service. Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 1, 10 and 100- year storm events. Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Describe how increased runoff from site is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. 2. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to approval of construction plans. 3. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer must be installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement requirements for storm sewer: 30" RCP and under - 15' easement 42"— 54" RCP - 20' easement 60"— 66" RCP - 25' easement 72"— 102" RCP - 30' easement Over 102" RCP— 3.5 times diameter Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets. Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed. Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre- construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these Case No. Attachment E ZA15-084 Page 5 improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Proposed street name needs to be approved by the City of Southlake prior to final plat. Submit proposed name and alternate names as soon as possible. Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un- sprinkled homes. (Due to the open space at the end of the cul-de-sac, which no structures will be built upon, relocate the fire hydrant further to the North within the cul-de-sac to be within 400 feet of the existing hydrant at the entrance to the street). The cul-de-sac must be a minimum 100' diameter pavement with no island in the middle that would obstruct trucks turning around. A Knox box is required for access to the private gated street. Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager 817-748-8607 pkao ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of$3000 per dwelling unit x 5 dwelling units= $15,000.00. Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian Case No. Attachment E ZA15-084 Page 6 access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. Other informational comments? General Informational Comments A SPIN meeting was held August 11, 2015. A Preliminary Plat that conforms to the underlying zoning district must be processed and approved and either a partial Plat Vacation and Final Plat or a Plat Revision that conforms to the underlying zoning district must be processed and approved and recorded with County prior to issuance of any building permits. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZA15-084 Page 7 Surrounding Property Owners 12 12101208 9p? �2 121 1218 1211 2Q9 1 � Sol ; E 803 948 1220 CONTINENTAL BLVD 800 a N ry 1021 1199 N 1:7— >N co r p r 1240 �_ r q40� "' r r2 0M ARLCa w CT N N 12 N D o 1 1400 �3ti3 131 N � N O V a T a r c" 1312 y o _ r r "' 130$ M o Ln N E "y iz 1304 O r � N 1201 1150 1 0 1170 �0 14D ,z03 �ELS o/, 1166 r��S V5h$ 1822 ^ Iy CD GQp j6O rs0 tr 1201 A� ti � '" 1668 ,3?T 0T 733 1612 rrrn A ly 1616 C 8 �� X425 1501 1503 h�� ^moo y 805 p 15 0 T�Op 1fi24 ti 1. Shiminski, Kyle Etux Juliana M RPUD 1207 SARAH PARK TRL 0.52 NR 2. Kankanala,Suresh Etux Smitha RPUD 901 JENNYTER 0.43 NR 3. Wong, Bonita Pan Hing RPUD 1209 SARAH PARK TRL 0.44 NR 4. Tade,Angie R Etvir Gavin D T RPUD 1211 SARAH PARK TRL 0.53 NR 5. Herring, Mary L RPUD 905 JENNY TER 0.65 NR 6. Broadway,AI E Etux Mary R RPUD 903 JENNY TER 0.39 NR 7. Timarron Owners Assn Inc RPUD 900 E CONTINENTAL BLVD 0.40 NR 8. Daley,Gunter Etux Dyann RPUD 1205 KIRKCALDY CT 0.47 NR 9. Musser, Bradley Etux Jane R RPUD 1202 EARLSTON CT 0.35 NR 10. Raines,Julian P Etux Claudia RPUD 1201 EARLSTON CT 0.93 NR 11. Madden, Kip S Etux Paula RPUD 1200 KIRKCALDY CT 1.57 NR 12. Southlake,City Of RPUD 1140 HAVEN CIR 0.21 NR 13. Eshraghi, Pouran MH 1145 HAVEN CIR 0.22 NR 14. Tufts,Jeffrey S Etux Tammy MH 1135 HAVEN CIR 0.19 NR 15. Keller,Wm M Bill Etux Myrna MH 1125 HAVEN CIR 0. U Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 1 16. Marlen,James R MH 1210 HAVEN CIR 0.23 O 17. Nguyen,Ty N Etux Tina T Cao MH 1215 HAVEN CIR 0.21 NR 18. Shrestha,Jaya Etux Liza MH 1220 HAVEN CIR 0.17 NR 19. Marable, Billie&C Hryorchuk MH 1225 HAVEN CIR 0.24 NR 20. Veerapalli,Vanajakshi Etux MH 1230 HAVEN CIR 0.22 O 21. Bedford,Stephen Etux Autumn MH 1240 HAVEN CIR 0.16 NR 22. Berridge, Kenneth Etux Leila MH 1115 HAVEN CIR 0.24 NR 23. Tachibana,Wes L MH 1245 HAVEN CIR 0.19 O 24. Hodges,Gregory Etux Brandi MH 1105 HAVEN CIR 0.18 NR 25. Abbott,Cory&Ines Collazo MH 1235 HAVEN CIR 0.23 O 26. Coffee,Todd MH 1250 HAVEN CIR 0.22 O 27. Schulte, Mark A Tr MH 1200 HAVEN CIR 0.24 O 28. Moore, Patrick&Brittany Homan RPUD 1170 HAVEN CIR 0.49 O 29. Andrews, Dustin Etux Ashley RPUD 1150 HAVEN CIR 0.47 NR 30. Paris, Mark F Etux Diana S RPUD 1160 HAVEN CIR 0.47 NR 31. Timarron Golf Club Inc RPUD 1425 BYRON NELSON PKWY 3.62 NR 32. Olukoga,Susan MH 1205 HAVEN CIR 0.24 O 33. Romano,John L Etux Christine RPUD 1166 HAVEN CIR 0.55 NR 809 Partners Lr SF2 1021 E CONTINENTAL BLVD 2.96 35. Zenuk, Mark Etux Charlene RPUD 1201 KIRKCALDY CT 0.82 U 36. Wilson, Michael S Etux Trish RPUD 1203 KIRKCALDY CT JL 0.61 U 37. Buthman, Mark Etux Tammy RPUD 1200 EARLSTON CT 0.88 O 38. Farance, Barclay Ross SF1-A 1199 E CONTINENTAL BLVD 0.90 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Responses Sent: Thirty-eight (38) Responses Received: Thirteen (13) - Attached Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 2 Notification Response Form ZA15-084 Meeting Date: September 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM 809 Partners Lp PO Box 142826 Irving Tx 75014 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby f in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 1 b Signature: '1'��-�.�✓�� Date: �2 Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): I 4,,q4 f Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Oth rwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 3 Notification Response Form ZAI5-084 f Rteeting Date: September 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM Wilson,Mictmel S Etux Trish 1203 Kirkcaldy Ct Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY - BEFORE-THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PU13LIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby r in favor of opposed to ndecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: rC 7-v _ EZ-OoL, /F 4? UA; b , miffsi^'w Signature: l Date: b 5 Additional Signature: Date* �� Printed Name(s): �}/ i-�1� �l - 7 Must be property owner(3)whose names)are printed at top. Ptherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per properly. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 4 Notification Response Form l ZA15-084 y Meeting Date: September 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM t Keller, Wm M Bill Etux Myrna 1125 Haven Cir Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 8 Signature: Date: d� Additional Signat Date: Printed Name(s): /12Y�44- Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Y/?— 4AI— 4�5-L Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 5 Notification Response Farm ZA15-004 Meeting Date: September 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM Moore, Patrick&Brittany Homan 1170 Haven Cir Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: tdwld homea0. 50 ?ire SignatureDate: 8xIS Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s)whose names)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Plali_*arttnerit, One form per property. Phone Number (optional): 91 7 -99YO&S-3 Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 6 Notification.Response Form ZA15-084 Meeting Date:September 3, 2015 at 5:30 PM Olukoga,Susan 1205 Haven Cir Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX 062 HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the propert so noted above, are hereby in favor of op used to undecided about =circle or underline ane) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Spic fc�rrmments regarding our asition- , � -�j"- u .� u)�'r y n1jRADn E- f l r-eb, +o "R,.-P °' p'-9-6f d�,n,� Pc�� Ye-tovn rsn� w o rte,- w ti t<iv c wrr [J�Gt L J2• `�� C vr� e-,QA AJA - Gran ted � c. P1 C c n h r>-n-}ta bar � eoo 1 �'� ti e� t n ti� �vn fl tzv WJ3 A1� ( tredLiv lle. �l iJcl�eU," c�dSen fI9f(Paa(A n\-Q� w I �GO-7a 1- _Wn.PAc T B u r C4W'nmv-1 v`'Fl Ver. Cir c - (�n� ScltinE3ls are_ dtrc4cqoQk Signature; Date: 541� 1L5 Additional Signature: � Dater Printed Name(s): P, (9 a--,) Must be property evmer(s)whose neme(s)are printed at top. Othorwisa contact the PlankffT6Department- One form per property. Phone Number (optional): (0 13 �'S- rC� Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 7 Notification Response Form Num, ZA15-084 Meeting Date: September 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM Tachibana,Wes L 1245 Haven Cir Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: V vtv 6t,t,j a"", Cf vy ✓V Gli01V (�) ✓4�/7e/(l/f✓/ Y✓/�- ''�� '14-s /J�w IiVY� 0 / j 6�// c�s� r� / �e 0,U6- 4_j J G v JJ./ G��'[ ��1VL--l-[C. 'P.4 S� �/ /""'"� G"N/W-YS �✓✓`".'_' T li/lav� T "`-tet �1nP.t//11✓. Lam- CJIiL:Y- Signature: Date: Additional Signature: II Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): 5917.. 2-`' 7- �,? 53 Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 8 Notification Response Form ZA15-084 Meeting Date: September 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM Schulte, Mark A Tr 1200 Haven Cir } Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: _%� � . �C Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): /Y)Ak,— 4, aj d 4,4 e,c�� Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 9 1 September 1, 2015 REFERENCE:ZA15-084 I am opposed to the zoning change and variances requested for the property located at 1021 E. Continental Blvd. Currently,the property is zoned SF-2 for one residence. The proposed zoning would allow 5 homes to be constructed on this property. The variances requested include: 1. Reducing the front yard from 35'to 15'. 2. Reducing the side yard from 15'to 5'. 3. Reducing the rear yard from 35'to 15'. 4. Reducing the Minimum Lot Area from 20,000 sq.ft.to 10,000 sq.ft. 5. Increasing the Maximum Lot Coverage from 30%to 45%. 6. Reducing the Lot Depth from 125'to 100'. I am opposed to the zoning changes and the variances requested for the following reasons: 1. DENSITY—The East Haven Addition Developer made several concessions and Developer Agreements with the City of Southlake to meet density requirements. These included: • Reduced the number of lots in the Haven. • Dedicated lots for a Southlake City Park(including a sprinkler system,trees, benches, and sidewalks). • Reduced the number of lots on the 3 acre property to 2 homes. • Provided a Maintenance Building to the City Of Southlake. • Provided sidewalks,a pedestrian bridge, and sewer system. The proposed zoning change and variances would negate the intent of the Developer Agreements to control density for the East Haven Addition. The City of Southlake should review these agreements as the proposed zoning change increases density from .32 (1 homes)to 1.62 (5 homes)for this property. The current property owner had a vision for further developing this unique, 3 acre property in Southlake. A beautiful wail, iron gate,gas lights,and a water well for irrigation were added to enhance this property. He developed plans for a single home, pool, and a tree plan for the property. The zoning changes were made to SF-2. The East Haven Developer Agreements and the City of Southlake's commitment to control density for the East Haven Addition would have been maintained. The proposed changes are intended to build as many homes as possible on this property and to maximize profits for the Diyar Eco Estates developer. Attached are East Haven Addition Site Plans for reference. 2. PRIVACY—Many of the homes in The Haven will have less privacy. The buyers of these homes thought the 3 acre property would have only one or two homes—not 5. This plan, if approved will have a negative impact on privacy for existing home owners and those purchasing the proposed homes. 3. TREE REMOVAL—The "Tree Preservation Plan" indicates removal of many mature existing trees. These trees add to the value of the property and provide privacy. Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 10 2 4. WATER WELL-It appears as though the water well that was completed for irrigating the 3 acre property will be removed. This is another necessary action required to fit the proposed homes on this property. The tree removal and water well removal is conflicting with the"Green/Eco"goals of the development. S. DRAINAGE—Many of the homes along the existing brick wall drain onto the 3 acre parcel. Homes built along this wall will hinder this drainage. As well as creating drainage issues for the new home buyers. 6. TRAFFIC—Pedestrian and car traffic on Continental can be very heavy at times. With more homes being added,this will worsen. 7. HOME APPRECIATION—One large home on the property is better for Haven home appreciation. 8. SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM—The"solar energy system"variance request is extremely vague. Solar roofing tiles, panels,shingles would be aesthetically unappealing and result in uncontrollable glare for existing and future neighbors. The potential exists to add solar panels to pergolas or other structures. Attached are East Haven Addition drawings for reference. The first was approved by the City Council on November 13, 2008 and the second shows the concept plan for one home with a revised date of May 24, 2011. If this zoning request is approved, a different builder or developer could be selected and significant design changes could be made to complete the development and achieve cost and profit objectives. For example, if the solar roofing tiles are too expensive,solar panels could be installed or more common roofing shingles. Mark A.Schulte 1200 Haven Circle Southlake,Texas 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 11 ga' ( 3 rg C�Y3g� g�°I ei 13; 3 e€A E c 9 JI Yasya —4a —� ...........gg ° jig.� � syB�� ` �° �� ° ��;�� 3 y`� ■ pg C$ 3 9ug wdDf §c $ g PIN ai glean 5 °r. g�(�� 8g3 bg�g5 Dae,eR�Eg�aEg l - N.Maytl1;R1l li! ��g- 51` E � qQDgl IIII3 a ,pps ^$ s g § Y iV � < §g _a" � a^ '9 �egg-�gY �% .1190 n� �° $s �- °� ®" a�jig e � � � e� of ea <.. •RE., ,s§ s- g s gash; Dg $�'�aag �D'��p e■g ��ng§� Y a�R$� dgba�DE 6b&a��°.D$912� D�e � agag■ a �QII � gs� NOayo 1,op s ;■�aX s Ya'-b§ ` a ° D -Ig °g lea gggg5191 . tg �a, p e -p i g affigY°bi<i.e8E4a e I ^Ibaga a�g�ae aeb t]agyM >"G R e< eb a< a e ." II xYy 11111 �� ° �yg ��ge §11115i P1111119 g y � q €� a�ji i § a8•g`-gag,D-Y t e g 11,s a gtDD E 1 eg #Ce® Ee B': 9aa-a 3 5 f 6I�EgSE eD�E €�I ESF�iOF1 #1111. �J- g p¢ ago �5 aY tl� bb Ye y by@ bb�R a�§4�ek 4"§£`dGh0§29 < 3 i 7—_---__—__—____��_iss=b ,. —tom—�_'•cS __� ,\ e �I s ^'• 'W �SkSk;f C Vs i A r--------------°a a.c ----� I: ----- - aTIB'43-E a,o.aa—_ ¢ ,I -------`---- --------- b $ r � r .sacro^\ DD a € € ------------- -- a II pp¢ a a — ',av sz■.a ,e n� —J ; I a "!R 8 $ X"sa g �{ s �� m a "0°a..1°■mwi■'uo ` = - — --_--------------—--- . — - ------- — -------------- ------------ ----------------------------- - — -------•---— == — p . ______----- , , SARAH PARK - pp 7II� $�pq TRAlL ' i O ■ 6 § E9 2 �wH Z a e -------------- + _ _ 6 D`I -' --•-----•------—c:sa-aa.'o€rM:-..--- ---------F -_�� -------------- -----_----_---_—_-----_------- ----�-- a----r� _� '� ,ae IF Q \ Y qq qq 3Egx 9dY 8 R F 12, visR. Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 12 dl f- - s l �E 41 elf � GONTI� EW -("Qtr � Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 13 z t z Z g° 3nxZ w �uw OZZFm2 r mQU O NF d 12: F ~ IL NNOw 8 a W N°W a W z 'OL' ii Q �oii O u Q ZZQaFI-Z ¢ ao O' OJYss'm �oil2 rpZ0 F aN '-�N W��F Waw�l Z rcyw N o ¢ Z z'G' a �i >Fa Z�' k ;=b >U W oarcpYOo a c� s Qo;u°<w a f a WONm'a 'w -00u 0O �a 2Yw zp'af r o w w M IIv� W.- e H Q LLJI�m < F WRA mw 0 d- ja$; Q ��rz N 181 MON W �m=pa «<Oo Y88' �9Yg"�k ' w II 0 z 15 IA Its ------------ L-_ Q'•[o SII I �^i0i 116Y IIT loo' , ¢ �O O' L • f_'f____�I r_____—,' �,.t�gg•.\/`` E �• E � III ��.. I I ' _ ________'4. ____� k___3 gjl �� --.. et i z - 1 PST�.'_ S rg•i a — ---— r— — — -- �- SARAI'I PARK I11 1 ;._ _ I — § gA 1 3 t § I t I M AK N1181x9 �� .. I - Y•'tn�w�y L k',,�—F�-� �r--_;,�r= 759( s xd 3 \ 5 S \\ / i _ Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 14 9/17/2015 Ci.southlaketcus Mail-ZA15-084 iTv iIF SOUTHLAKE Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> ZA15-084 1 message Mark Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:15 AM To: Richard Schell <rschell(c_)cl.soutnlaKe.tx.us> I am opposed to the zoning change and the exceptions requested. I am opposed for the reasons presented at the 9/3/2015 meeting and the following: 1 . TEN property owners were OPPOSED TO the zoning change and ONE property owner was in FAVOR (the owner) . 2 . The EAST HAVEN ADDITION was only approved with 2 homes on the 3 acre parcel . Southlake required this to control density for the entire EAST HAVEN ADDITION. 3 . Attached Development Plan dated July 12, 2007 . 4 . Attached Approved Plan dated November 18, 2008 . Note : 6 homes removed, City Park dedicated, several Developer Agreements concessions, etc. 5 . Attached Final EAST HAVEN ADDITION Development Plan dated June 2, 2010 . https.//mail.google.com/m ai I/?ui=2&i k=178f934086&view=pt&search=i nbox&th=14fdc 17a86f454ea&sim l=14fdc l7a86f454ea 1/2 Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 15 9/17/2015 Usouthlake.tx.us Mail-ZA15-084 6 . Currently zoned for one home . 7 . Concern for rain drainage/flooding through brick wall and additional creek flooding around entire area . Thank you. Mark A. Schulte 1200 Haven Circle Southlake, Texas 76092 3 attachments HAVEN0807.pdf 382K EHAVEN111308.pdf 2197K East Haven Final Development Plan 6-2-10.pdf 1002K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&i k=178f934086&view=pt&search=i nbox&th=14fdc 17a86f454ea&si m I=14fdc 17a86f454ea 2/2 Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 16 z N Z z a "Z 0 r, 0 0 F- oiW z 0 z6 . w w -0 -Za11 >0'w zw M 0 Sr -0�w Izu i W 6 1 lq* a o�z w 1 0 6 9 ZO w. z 2 >w < P 00 i z .0�-01 Z.��n F w >: z z &29 1, '0'* z 'z W,>w w, 0 01 P 2 6 Z6 IL w 0: g Lj Y) > u:.3 T a x<1 c4 Z),w 2: w<w, < 0 It w U 0 < Z 0 J aw: 10 x 114 Iz 2: > w w < 13 Ir z w WOOF IJK 0< a z 02 11,-Ij 5 w < u Ql9QN 1. w w w 0 x wz < Q w U Z 00 N z 0 <<u 2 w < I(t 'M < :,q iq 2 W o 0 wLLz 0 ww zo u uu w m,7 wtU f 0' wa ft x mm Of wCa Ili < 'd 0. 00 w Z 0 0 Zz 09 z ¢30 -i >0 rCLL < amu ,0 &0 z boo z,oo T '44 6 .1 02 --------------- -------I----,-- --------------------- c4 F- -0 o I owCN Z W lo-q N Z 0 u ------------------------------—-- bi E MHVd HVUVS zw U < 0. OW r Case No. Attachment F ZAl 5-084 Page 17 p 34MY 26 Mgt 25 $4 eg".� C SaJ 8 1 1 ��aRII 'gill d 4 E oo �y'Y' p ppy1 .§ 49 e14 fill V q ��§@sd�gr§� p y °d 4s eI"J ^°ppgpgese pp 4a s °dEaap'§"d§Y§°n$ °y n3 y1y4 Xisill, Yk7 ¢4§- °Y�` _ IT'l ON-1,§ala; g hie' i°§p SP € S � ° �ji •9° a4 e 9§� s 9dRpn s d ,ai §d de 9R r€s ssss !, Ess s.4 ss p @4pq`i @ @'€ fill �ga�:'�� y@pp�§ gc3xl °S�§&°e�s9§ §R§ i ke@eA§ige §Ad§g§° hw ^x^gc .§dna.a gRaR6ae n i @ §.".ra::c:„°�g p$ Fp$a�{p{ @ � add� !�� dtlQ9 tlUtlh4 BR Y�tl9� a�d9n"P Y§ �� i��_ � ��;•� idtrR ` Iyeit HE 11§Mf1h G,'xl3�§d�2111s�dPi��:1�3@11�1dds11§§�d�s€�B ll s 1��s � d�8�sa 941: W . —._______ti wun urs_�------—Y`�—'1°r•---� __/ _ Vic sovm'V]'c "le � s i L--------------arr---� n Li It ;; noom'iaw sw.ss 37F.7-- a — - _ � I' ---------- s g $ ---------___` e� crxccs ^^-- -„uvea ei a -- q - .R 3 s IM `_ in y p 3a y9 SARAH PARR , z I'b g §§ 4 1511!q .. 1 I, In 6 .. Ill F,— __ __--tai .,�,. F - a§; r @ __-___..-.—— - - -__ -------------- ,r. r. -- lis INN ds I� Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 18 Iw3waoivaa nxla-xaiiaw K3nvx Irv3 I =0 PI " Ro 0 W Z Oil 0,01 938 {°EO Z oN O QU.2W WaN N a E � ZU �- 'o� < G<w ° a F w w¢ oma was Ni Q z °u° d, 2 Z Frc ro GG .> 0° zzn Z� w ,� J aX CON po'8� [- at A f a UQ �N It J Z �°zz c�o Ync a Z i �~ atflN >4Kn I�ctQ Q LLU'ZO pLL ? O O W NN WYh1 W I" y12Nm 4 fS ® -1 W W ° W aK j O\ �ocn Q ON>m FR 4 .,. � W ' W OF p7, yCj� i Ww�P r Q �iZ. �8 ° a ( ❑ = w mw waw 8F ..I WNIW 0° N A a > ag alR' 0 3 ]o CLLQf Wy$� Q E 0_�Si f(f) U _ W 0< _Z w 'n W W W Z< 6 a w ° j0�Z2 �I I W z N J €WW N6 Q a�3Qa FW W n I 1 I` I 111 i I - --- 61 .... , 1 , -- ------------- V ---''_ i� 'u! �Ffl811�9 i - - ----- i o ® - I l r ---------- - - I -------------------- - - -'-- - --- -- --- � s.-a' i -----3 --__-- - i� r------ - - "T I -------------------------------------- ' a I ¢ 1 -------- -_;`jam -'h-_-_—_ J ) �» __ - I gad I Ic, I 37!R ;I , ;i 1 SARAH PARK - ---------------- I . AifM-: I i s LEAilOG3��` Y- J Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 19 912!2015 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-ZA15-084 19Crry Of 5OLFFHLWE Holly Blake<hblake@ci.south lake.tx.us> ZA15-084 3 messages Kathy Coffee Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:53 PM Reply-To: Kathy uottee To: "Hblake@ci.southlak_._u, -,,,,,a,ce@ci.southlake.tx.us> To whom it may concern, We are opposed to the proposed zoning change and development plan ZA15-084. We believe there are too many significant changes being requested. w opposed to the number of homes planned for the lot. " opposed to the removal of 2 mature trees, the Cottonwood and Pecan. "concerned about the drainage. *concerned about traffic flow Todd &Kathy Coffee 1250 Haven Circle 817-602-6453 Holly Blake<hblake@ci.southlake.tx.us> Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:54 PM To: Kathy Coffee have received your response and will print this out for the Commission. [Quoted text hidden] Holly Blake Administrative Secretary-Planning Certified Permit Technician-Building Inspections City of Southlake 817-748-8621 hblake@ei.southlake.U.us Kathy Coffee< Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM Reply-To: Kath, To: Holly Blake• ...,.u,.v�L_vL;i.suuinlaKe.tx.us- Thanks Holly! [Quoted text hidden] Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 20 Notification Response Form ZA15-084 Meeting Date: September 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM Abbott, Cory&Ines Collazo 1235 Haven Cir - Southlake Tx 76092 - PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY __BBFORE TRE.-START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (opp:po�sedtp undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Thank you for the opportunity to voice our opinion. Our concerns are high density,poor drainage,and privacy for the property owners that would back up to the three proposed houses on the west side of the development. As a Realtor,I believe that the product that Diyar Eco Estates is offering doesn't conform to what individuals expect for a$1.5 million property. The three lots that will be adjacent to Haven subdivision are too small and the close proximity of the Haven subdivision homes to the Diyar Eco Estates is too small for privacy,which we believe will affect the sale and resale of the affected properties. The build lines need to conform to our city's standards and low-density models.Lastly,this subdivision was granted an exception to allow for two,single-family homes when the Haven subdivision was created. How fair is it to the existing homeowners,who were sold a house with that understanding? More so,what kind of example does this set for future construction? Signature: Date: Additional Signature: � Date: Printed Name(s): CQf�A 6�ha66 ani )y1es c011a2c� Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)arepnnted at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Y/'7- Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 21 Notification Response Form ZA16-084 Meeting Date: September 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM Buthman, Mark Etux Tammy 1200 Eariston Ct Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of apposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: a& tf i Y' /�� dr .� [ Y .',doe.&doe arr e-eL' r:,C • Signature: Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at toll'Otherwise contact the Planning Department, One Form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 22 9/1/2015 Usouthlake.bws Mail-Fwd:Proposed rezoning of the land adjacent to Haven 0 Gtry O1: U "RK Richard Schell <rschell@ci.south lake.tx.us> Fwd: Proposed rezoning of the land adjacent to Haven 1 message Jerod Potts<jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:51 PM To: Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Forwarded message-- From: Jim R. Marion Date: Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:26 PM Subject: Proposed rezoning of the land adjacent to Haven To:jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us Dear Mr. Potts: I respectfully oppose the plan to change the zoning on the subject lot from one to five homes. Specifically, my backyard overlooks that property and I relied to my financial detriment on the lot remaining zoned for one large home. Five homes is unsightly, and will result in destruction of beautiful trees and drainage. I sincerely hope that aesthetics are considered in your deliberations. Thank you for your anticipated consideration. Jim Marlen 1210 Haven Circle Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 23 Notification Response Form ZA1 5v-084 Muting Data:September 3,2015 at 6:30 PM Zenuk,Mark Etux Charlene 1201 KIrkcaldy Ct Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s)of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided abou (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: (&;%C^' j A4 )A &\044- -�Oitbe4r�\- t'A� W- G)G)� ON '4c c C. ".4s sorc re*A- Signature: Date: OS ;? IS Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owners)whose ame(s)ere printed ettita�p..{Otherwise contactthePlanning department, One farm per property, Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 24 Notification Response Form ZA15-084 p ; Meeting Date: September 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM t: Veerapalli, Vanajakshi Etux 1230 Haven Cir Southlake Tx 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor ofopposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Q-� PIP-4v Atk-,�Li +v,(jAF v�ov� �dw Ln u✓ l� L� , Q 71 �n t l lJ QOM Signature: aJ A f Date: o o Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): NAja A j D KSSlVEE Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA15-084 Page 25 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-703 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1R, BLOCK 2, EAST HAVEN ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 3.079 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF-2" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "R- PUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-2" Single Family Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, Case No. Attachment G ZA15-084 Page 1 WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, Case No. Attachment G ZA15-084 Page 2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Lot 1 R, Block 2, East Haven Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat filed as Instrument No. D211037986, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 3.079 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF-2" Single Family Residential District to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District as depicted on the approved Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following conditions: Case No. Attachment G ZA15-084 Page 3 1 . SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in Case No. Attachment G ZA15-084 Page 4 those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the Case No. Attachment G ZA15-084 Page 5 official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1St reading the day of , 2015. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2015. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment G ZA15-084 Page 6 EXHIBIT "A" Being described as 1 R, Block 2, East Haven Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat filed as Instrument No. D211037986, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Case No. Attachment G ZA15-084 Page 7 EXHIBIT "B" Reserved for approved Development Plan Case No. Attachment G ZA15-084 Page 8