The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 6ACITY OF SOUTHLAKE Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT September 29, 2015 CASE NO: ZA15-070 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Landlock LLC, c/o Warren Clark Development, Four Peaks Development, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court from "AG" Agricultural Zoning District to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District with base SF -20A Zoning on approximately 5.8 acres on property described as portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 851 and 841 E Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #9. DETAILS: Four Peaks Development, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court from the current "AG" Agricultural Zoning District to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District, consisting of eight (8) residential lots and two (2) open space lots on approximately 5.8 acres. The following table is the Matthews Court site data summary information and development regulations as proposed: Matthews Court - Site Data Summary Proposed SF -20A Number of Residential Lots 8 N/A Gross Acreage 5.8 Acres N/A Density 1.4 DU/Gross Acre 2.18 DU/Net Acre 1.5 DU/Net Acre Open Space Acreage (%) 0.62 Acre (10.68%) 1 N/A Development Minimum Lot Size 20,000 sq. ft. 20,000 sq. ft. Maximum Height 2'h stories / 35 ft. 2'h stories / 35 ft. Not less than 25 ft., with an Front Yard Setback additional reduction of up to Not less than 35ft. 25% (6.5 ft.) for tree preservation Side Yard Setback Not less than 10 ft. Not less than 15 ft. Not less than 30 ft., Not less than 40 ft., Rear Yard Setback provided that lots fronting provided that lots on a cul-de-sac not less fronting on a cul -de - than 25 ft. sac, not less than 35 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage 40% 30% The applicant is proposing to construct Zena Rucker Road per the requirements of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. The road has been aligned such that it can be constructed on the subject property. The City will be installing a box culvert at the creek to the west of the property to allow Zena Rucker Road to be extended east. The applicant has Case No. ZA15-070 ACTION NEEDED: ATTACHMENTS STAFF CONTACT: Case No. ZA15-070 agreed to install a bridge and it is the understanding of staff that bridge concepts will be presented at the meeting. Future R.O.W. dedication of the Hayes' property to the north may be required at the time of development of their property to ensure adequate parkway for a sidewalk and utilities along the north side of Zena Rucker Road. Dedication is estimated to be less than 200 square feet. The applicant has provided additional information for the proposed Matthews Court development and exhibits that can be found under Attachment "C" of this staff report. 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Zoning Change and Development Plan Approval Request (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) SPIN Meeting Report (E) Development Review Summary No. 2, revised September 28, 2015 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map (G) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (H) Ordinance No. 480-701 (1) Full Size Plans (for City Council Only) Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Jerod Potts (817) 748-8195 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Landlock LLC, c/o Warren Clark Development APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, LLC PROPERTY SITUATION: 851, 841 E. Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: There is no development history at the project site CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for this project on June 23, 2015 at Southlake Town Hall. A SPIN Meeting Report is included as Attachment "D" of this report. SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Medium Density Residential. As proposed, this development is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan. The image to the right illustrates the Future Land Use for the proposed location. Master Thoroughfare Plan Zena Rucker Road currently does not connect between Byron Nelson Parkway Case No. Attachment A ZA15-070 Page 1 Future Land Use Matthews Court Future Land Use ° Oe Co ESOUTHLAKF BLVD\ 100 -Year Flood Plain Corps of Engineers Property \\ \\ izetau c°mmer�iai Public Park/Open Space aetaii comme-a I \ \ Public/Semi-Public Low Density Residential �e com eraai �� I Medium Density Residential Office Commercial k g� BD Retail Commercial Mixed Use ZENA RUCKE \\ _ Town Center Regional Retail \\ �� Industrial T-FPubliGSemi-Public \ o 150 3oo fico DS Feet \ — ��\ r ��LA_ CCE —i— Density Re d— al „ &E Master Thoroughfare Plan Zena Rucker Road currently does not connect between Byron Nelson Parkway Case No. Attachment A ZA15-070 Page 1 MT 12 and Carroll Avenue. Access to this proposed subdivision is contingent upon the construction of Zena Rucker Road, which according to the Southlake Master Thoroughfare Plan is designated as a 2 -lane collector (C2U) with a minimum 60' R.O.W. required. A minimum radius of 400' and minimum tangent length of 50' between curves is required per Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. This development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of offsite R.O.W. and construction of a portion of Zena Rucker Road. Note, the applicant is not proposing to finish the connection of Zena Rucker Road between Byron Nelson Parkway and Carroll Avenue; the street is proposed to stub leaving approximately 600' to the nearest cross street to the east. Mobility Master Plan The Mobility Master Plan recommends the extension of Zena Rucker Road east to S. Carroll Avenue. Below is the recommendation as written within the Mobility Master Plan. The proposal for Matthews Court states that in conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S. Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway. As Rucker Extend Rucker Assist in bridging and Prade Road east to S the floodplain to properties Carroll Ave. enable the develop, Roadways are completion of the traffic anticipated to be Rucker extension volumes constructed as project. are development occurs expected to with city increase participation in along FM bridging the 1709. floodplain. Mobility, Efficient Infrastructure, Mobility Cl, C2 Options VGO Priority Res Tie I Tier De 3.9 3 Pathways / Sidewalk Plan The Official Pathways Map, adopted by City Council on January 7, 2014 designates that the north side of Zena Rucker Road is designated as having a future sidewalk that is less than 8 feet wide and the south side of Zena Rucker Road is designated as having a future multiuse trail that is greater than or equal to 8 feet wide. The pedestrian access plan for Matthews Court shows a continuation of the existing 8 foot wide hike & bike trail on the south side of Zena Rucker Road, which was designed to connect with the future trail to the east and the west. Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan The Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan was approved by City Council on September 20, 2011. The following recommendations are relevant to the medium density cluster residential area designated on the Illustrative Recommendations Map (below chart). Ref. Issue Recommendation No. Case No. Attachment A ZA15-070 Page 2 Ref. Issue Recommendation No. 1. Land use designation Medium Density Retain the Medium Density Residential Residential designation for the area south of Zena Rucker Road 2. Considerable amount of area dedicated to floodplain and other Encourage "cluster" residential LU3 water features development Preserve heavily wooded areas, especially within drainage areas and floodplain 1. Environmental stewardship and Encourage water reuse for irrigation innovation in green building Encourage green building design 2. Reserved open space/landscape areas practices require heavy irrigation E2 Preserve and enhance existing ponds 3. On-site drainage detention facilities Reflect the desired preservation on the Carroll/1709 Small Area Illustrative Map on the Environmental Resource Protection map 1. Desire to decrease dependence on the Development should be pedestrian automobile for everyday needs oriented, emphasizing pedestrian connectivity in any residential areas. M1 2. Two schools, shopping and offices all within close proximity of the site Provide passive trails through preserved natural areas which also provide connectivity to the sidewalk system 1. Create a vibrant and appealing Provide curvilinear streets streetscape along the area's local M3 streets Provide street trees between the sidewalk and the street curb 1. A landscaped parkway concept with Consider the creation of a new 60' ROW minimal pavement is desired for Zena 2- lane divided collector (C2D) with Rucker Road medians and left-turn/stacking lanes at intersections in the Mobility Plan to 2. Landscaped medians preferred apply to Zena Rucker Road 3. No on -street, parallel parking is "Urban" cross section which includes M4 desired curb, gutters, medians, street trees and sidewalks. Speed limit not to exceed 30 m.p.h. Design as a local slow movement roadway. 1. Appropriately buffer and screen Recommend a parkway buffer and residential south of Zena Rucker Road street trees adjacent to Rucker Road. U2 from any non-residential uses to the north side of Zena Rucker Road Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan Illustrative Recommendations Map. Case No. Attachment A ZA15-070 Page 3 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions Portions of Zena Rucker Road have been constructed from Byron Nelson Parkway and from S. Carroll Avenue. The proposal for Matthews Court states that in conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S. Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway. Traffic Impact • Vehicle Trips Per Day . AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday . Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7t" Edition UTILITIES: Water The applicant is proposing a connection to an existing eight inch (8") water line running north of the existing portion of Zena Rucker Road. The Preliminary Water & Sanitary Sewer Layout for Matthews Court shows that the proposed eight inch (8") water line and valve will stub out with at nearly the same place as the proposed extension of Zena Rucker Road. The applicant is proposing an 8 inch (8") water line and valve to run along the west side of proposed Matthews Court road in order to service the subdivision. Sewer Case No. Attachment A ZA15-070 Page 4 The applicant will be extending 8 inch (8") sewer from a sewer manhole located between Rockenbaugh Elementary and Lot 4, Block 1 Pecan Creek. The applicant is proposing an 8 inch (8") sanitary sewer main to run along the west side of proposed Matthews Court road in order to service the subdivision. TREE PRESERVATION: There is approximately 39.8% tree canopy coverage, and the applicant is proposing to preserve as much as 54.3% of that tree cover. There is approximately 8.8% of that cover that is marginal and could potentially be removed. The proposed Tree Conservation Plan is attached. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: August 6, 2015; Approved (6-0) subject to review summary 2, dated July 31, 2015 and subject to the staff report dated July 31, 2015. CITY COUNCIL: August 18, 2015; Approved (7-0) Ordinance No. 480-701 (ZA15-070) 1s` Reading Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court subject to staff report dated August 11, 2015 and development plan review summary #2 dated July 31, 2015. September 1, 2015; Tabled (6-0) on Consent Ordinance No. 480-701 (ZA15- 070) 2nd Reading Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court to the September 15, 2015 City Council meeting September 15, 2015; Tabled (7-0) on Consent Ordinance No. 480-701 (ZA15- 070)2 nd Reading Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court to the October 6, 2015 City Council meeting STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, revised September 28, 2015 WCommunity DevelopmentlMEMO12015 Cases1070 - ZDP - Matthews CourtlStaff ReportlZA 15-070 - CC - 2015-10-06 2nd Reading. doc Case No. Attachment A ZA15-070 Page 5 Vicinity Map 851 and 841 E. Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave. EAST SOUTH LAKE BLVD N ZA 15-070 W+E Zoning Change and Development Plan 0 200 400 800 1,200 Feet F.M. 1 Case No. Attachment B ZA15-070 Page 1 Plans and Support Information Proposed Development Plan rf ,EBD PDWER PDLE ENT EASEMENTEN nEADwra \ uE MA�HOLEASAN sswsR III L \� .Nn MANHOLs s Loi n' BLOON Awv WATER VALVE RM OR, z po. wo N RT Corn PIGPt9 FA RH y,II @c m1L, - 6z - q'. \ \ SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART r PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: a\ LOCATION MAP (N.1 A�R A RED UO TIET o,cn FlcE� CO., AL \ are �hk Ll �o�—� m 10 r �yl o MEDIUM oTrv=In RE= LIT -_ BLOCK A a oc N q UE BE o O U CONED. Ac recd 111 ESIDENTIAL � • a I . NEDNN DErvsITv R I I I R Baa�CP:T1. RO RENT �.SDzb ol�M —OT1 NENIOEN„AL Lun- MEOI�M CEN NE IOENTIAL \ \ SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: FOR ZA15-070 ZONING REQUEST ANTICIPATED START DATE: 4TH QUARTER EXISTING ZONING: AG 2015 N0. DELTA RADIUS LECURVE TABLE TANGENT CHORD BEARING CHORD MATTHEWS COURT PROPOSED ZONING: R -PUD LAND USE DESIGNATION: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL _ BE qW. KNIGHT SURVEY. ABSTRACT NO. 899 PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATION: C3 CITY OF SOIITIL B. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL G4 A 14'4J'' 105.00' 112.65' 62.5]' 50619'15"W 107.50' FOUR PEAKS DEVELOPMENT, LLC APPLICANT GROSS ACREAGE: 5.6 AC} (252,901 SF) NET ACREAGE: 5.3 AC} (230,393 SF) C5 2800 E- SouMloke EIADI q Suite 120-323 (214)6]6-30.14 AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 2 7, 024 SF} C7 1508'27" 430.00' 113.63' 57.15' Sd4'23'24"E 113.30' Contocl:4— m— OPEN SPACE AS A PERCENTAGE: lo. B6% NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS: 6 LOTS TABLE LINE TA LAND OCK. C LANDLOCK. LLC OWNER MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 20,000 SF LINE BEARING DISTANCE n (972)931-6971 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: 1.5 L075/NET AC MAX IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER LOT: 40% L1 S76'49'10"E 5339' Addle.. FBI— 75001 C9nt9C1: Dale Cledt JBI PARTNERS, INC. AUTHORIZED AGENT L4 SPH, 737E ?1 21' 18301 Cumum Dh , S.A. 200 B (972)2-76 NOTES. El SUN'SEQUIPMENT NEI canmcti T'ty "' G N. ,00,Gaoo ED ANCI GROUND SCREENED INCACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIMSION OR FINANCE NO 483 SECTION B.G5. L7 L6 ND1 S7'37"W N43'02'23'E 5 94' 2121' u�r u; 995 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 1 Tree Conservation Plan PLANTED IN COMMON AREA . CILI-rl INCITES TREE SIZES TREES it3 TREES LESS THAN 10" �_� EXISTING PRESERVED TREES J TREES 10" - 19" Ir•-'� POSSIBLE PRESERVED TREES C_J EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED I TREES 20" - 29" TREE UNOPY CO'JERAGE � rort•L srtE.uEa zsz SRI ;F 1s.E K•J•) ._ - u� rrrR x�_. r/__•", io�N ..uln��nlKu•s mu.v. ]r Iz.=ACV) som rain —1 1 TREES 30" AND GREATER R.ESFRYIOTREE UNW `�/ FRFSFiVf.]rAFF'AlMV10RFElt CS.)4iu 11.0401/0 tS.1•ti TY:4rEI F.II'IFR 37f1111Rrr` TRE- RAID PUSSIR.1 alE�kRYkO'R33. LRN1T'CIFl_U1Y,i Y,2.19 iF IJ.J 4C.f--) &a.. •>Y4N I�.L 4t.l•J NSb �`Nru! IF! as Ctlf£R EI:aE3 PL�F3El� qlV_E=iTC�Y TEE !Ir ar�.anenj ZA15-070 MATTHEWS COURT TREE CONSERVATION PLAN SOUTHLAKETEXAS Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 2 Open Space Plan I'+j it � p S• L � 1E�View From Rucker Road _/ N.T.S. Close -Up View 2® OPEN SPACEePLAN FOR ZA1Fi-070 ZONING REQUEST MATTHEWS COURT 8.D08 ACRES OUT OF T E O.W. KNIWT SIUR4 . AB3IRACT NO. SOD C_ OF SOUTILAKE. —I— FOUR I — CWNIY. TDLtS FOUR PEAKS OEU OPMENT, LLC APPLICANT 25We_ Seut 1_ B2ou1evoN. Sults 120-323 (214)818-3138 kmk: Tem MeklHeWe LANOLOCK. LLC OWNER AEClmn�i elm )5001 (012)831—BBT test:r Bel. aen JBI PARTNERS, INC. AUTHORIZED AGENT 1 tl301 =07=61 uervm 0 0, S 2W B (812)288 -)BK tacF CmJany SNe 1 uNE � m15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 3 s 3 � a ob. Moe a (wsce.-nremle..) ....Mwe 2® OPEN SPACEePLAN FOR ZA1Fi-070 ZONING REQUEST MATTHEWS COURT 8.D08 ACRES OUT OF T E O.W. KNIWT SIUR4 . AB3IRACT NO. SOD C_ OF SOUTILAKE. —I— FOUR I — CWNIY. TDLtS FOUR PEAKS OEU OPMENT, LLC APPLICANT 25We_ Seut 1_ B2ou1evoN. Sults 120-323 (214)818-3138 kmk: Tem MeklHeWe LANOLOCK. LLC OWNER AEClmn�i elm )5001 (012)831—BBT test:r Bel. aen JBI PARTNERS, INC. AUTHORIZED AGENT 1 tl301 =07=61 uervm 0 0, S 2W B (812)288 -)BK tacF CmJany SNe 1 uNE � m15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 3 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 4 Proposed Development Standards MATTHEWS COURT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development shall take place in accordance with Section 14 (SF -20A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) of the Southlake Zoning Ordinance, as amended, unless as otherwise identified below. 1. Matthews Court shall be developed in general accordance with the Concept Plan. 2. Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than 25', with an additional reduction of up to 25% (6.5') for tree preservation. Said determination shall take place at the time of building permit submittal for the individual home and shall be agreed upon by the City as part of the building permit approval process. 3. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than 10'. 4. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than 30', provided that on lots fronting on a cul-de- sac, there shall be a rear yard of not less than 25'. 5. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding 40% of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet. 6. Neighborhood Screening: Screening of the neighborhood from Zena Rucker Road shall be accomplished with a combination of masonry wall and landscaping as shown on the Open Space Plan and Neighborhood Screening Exhibit. Six foot (6') tall, open style metal fencing shall be provided along the western limits of the neighborhood. Eight foot (8') tall, board -on -board cedar fencing with a cap running across the top of the boards shall be provided along the southern and eastern limits of the neighborhood. Metal poles shall be used with the cedar fencing. Additionally, any fence cross members shall be placed on the inside of the neighborhood. This perimeter fencing shall be stained a uniform color and shall be of a similar appearance as that which was built for the nearby Winding Creek neighborhood. With the exception of the screening along Zena Rucker Road, which will be built in conjunction with the development of the neighborhood, the above referenced screening will be built in conjunction with the home construction on the affected lot. 7. Fencing: Fencing provided for individual lots and not addressed as part of the neighborhood screening shall be provided as follows. Eight foot (8') tall board -on -board cedar fencing with a cap running across the top of the boards shall be provided along the interior side lot lines up to a point no closer than 20' behind the front building line of the lot. Metal open fencing shall be provided for any fencing generally running parallel to the street. MATTHEWS COURT PAGE I JUL 24, 2015 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 5 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 6 8. The right-of-way for Matthews Court shall be 40' wide, as shown on the Concept Plan. However, the right-of-way for the bulb of the cul-de-sac shall have a 55' radius, while the paving of the cul-de-sac shall have a minimum 50.5' radius. 9. The alignment of Matthews Court shall be as shown on the Concept Plan. MATMEWS COURT P A G7 12 JUL 24, 2015 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 7 Proiect Intent and Purpose MATTHEWS COURT Matthews Court is a proposed eight lot, single family pocket neighborhood with two common greens situated at its front door. These greens establish the first impression most people will have of the neighborhood as they are visiting residents or just passing by. A rezoning to the R -PUD district with specific regulations tailored for this neighborhood is being requested. A plat establishing the development pattern for the neighborhood accompanies the rezoning request. The property is located on the south side of the future extension of Zena Rucker Road. Its western boundary is approximately 950' east of Byron Nelson Parkway and its eastern boundary is approximately 1500' west of S. Carroll Avenue. In conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across those culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer. This extension of Zena Rucker Road will bring it closer to its ultimate connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S. Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway. PURPOSE and INTENT: The purpose and intent for this zoning change is to allow for a single family residential development which is being further done in compliance with the City's Master Land Use Plan. R -PUD zoning is being utilized to create greater flexibility in designing single story homes, a trend and desire of the current market place. Also, by having reduced setbacks, greater flexibility will be given to builders and architects in positioning the houses and will bring the houses closer to the street, creating a more intimate and neighborly environment. Also, the greater flexibility in positioning the houses will allow and encourage the saving of any significant trees that might, otherwise, be lost. Development shall take place in accordance with Section 14 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance (SF -20A, Single Family Residential District), as amended, unless otherwise noted with the rezoning application. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: Over the last 10 to 15 years the property has not been utilized for its previous residential or agricultural uses. With the tract being landlocked, very little, if any, maintenance has occurred and the quality and condition of trees on the property has deteriorated greatly. It is the plan and intent that this development will introduce a quality forestation with the requirement of each property to plant a significant number of shade trees and understory trees; trees that have been cultivated and bred to grow strong and tall, in the case of the shade trees and full and colorful in the case of the understory trees. Also, these new trees can also tolerate the use of automatic irrigation systems required of each home in Matthews Court Within the designated open spaces, the developer will also plant a significant number of trees as well as complimenting lower level landscape material and attractive hardscape. Specifically, every new home will be required to plant 24 caliper inches of shade trees being any combination of Live Oak, Burr Oak, Chinkapin Oak, American Elm, Lace Bark Elm, Loblolly Pine. Additionally, each new house shall be planted with 2 understory trees being either Japanese Maple, Dogwood, Red Bud. MATTHEWS COURT Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 8 Of the existing 228 trees, there are 168 trees not in the right of way. Of this number, 84 will be permitted to be removed with this development, either by the developer or the builder. Of those that are to be removed, 77 are Hackberry, Hercules Club or similar type tree. OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN: At the north end of the proposed development, adjacent to Zena Rucker Road will be two open space lots. On the east side of Matthews Court is Lot 9X being 11,192 square feet and on the west side is Lot IOX being 15,832 square feet. The open space is 10.3% of the total site. Within the open space the city required Hike and Bike trail will be constructed to connect with the future trail to the east and the west. Also within the open space, sidewalks will be constructed to tie into the sidewalks to be constructed as homes are built on the east and west sides of Matthews Court, the single cul de sac street within the development. The open space lots will have a mix of existing and new trees as well as ground cover and turf grass. Overhead pedestrian portals will be constructed over both the east and west sidewalks leading into the residential lots and a structure with a small water feature will be constructed on the west side open space creating a more formal entry into the development. An entry sign identifying the subdivision may also be constructed within the open space. Maintenance of the open space lots and improvements made upon those lots will be the responsibility of the, to be created, Matthews Court Homeowners Association. It is estimated the annual maintenance and operating expense for the open space lots and improvements, will be $16,000 per year. These funds will be generated from mandatory dues paid by the individual property owners at an initial rate of $250 per month, or $2,000 per year. It is understood that any change to the open space plan, following its initial approval by the City Council, will have to be approved by subsequent City Council action. Within the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Matthews Court, to which all the lots will be subject, a provision will state that: 'In the event the party responsible for maintenance of the open space fails to maintain all or any portion in reasonable order and condition, the City of Southlake may, but is not required to, assume responsibility for its maintenance and may enter the premises and take corrective action, including extended maintenance. The cost of such maintenance may be charged to the Homeowner's Association, or to the individual property owners that make up the Homeowner's Association, and may include administrative costs and penalties. Such costs shall become a lien on all subdivision properties. DEVELOPER AGREEMENT ISSUES: 1. Park Fees: Prior to presenting the Developer Agreement to the City Council for its approval, the developer will meet with the City of Southlake Park Board and ask that the park fees normally due for this project be waived in trade for the developer making certain bridge enhancements and extending the Hike and Bike trail across the creek, to the west from the Matthews Court neighborhood, tying into the existing trail. With the development of the creek crossing, we propose making bridge enhancements of railing and columns anchored by an oversized column on the southwest corner of the bridge, generally in compliance with the City designed wayfarer signage found elsewhere in Southlake. The cost of the enhancements and hike and bike trail extension will exceed the $24,000 of park fees normally charged for the proposed project. 2. Road/Bridge Improvements and Road Impact Fees: The City of Southlake, through its approved Capital Improvement Plan, has agreed to install the culverts, headwalls and make the necessary grading for the extension of Zena Rucker Road across the creek where the road currently terminates east of Byron Nelson Parkway. As Zena Rucker Road is identified on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan as a future collector street, and as a part of our development, we agree to dedicate a disproportionate amount of the right of way and construct a disproportionate amount of Zena Rucker Road, subject to reimbursements based on proportionality. MATTHEWS COURT Case No. Attachment C ZA15-070 Page 9 USOUTHLAK-E SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN2015-23 Project Name: Matthews Court SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #9 Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: 2 Host: Bobbie Heller, Community Engagement Committee Applicant(s) Presenting: Tom Matthews City Staff Present: Jerod Potts, Planner I; Dennis Killough, Deputy Director of Planning and Development Services; Mike White, Chief Building Inspector City Staff Contact: Dennis Killough, Deputy Director of Planning and Development Services (817) 748-8072 • Attached to the end of this report are the Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the 6/23/2015 SPIN Town Hall Forum Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on "Learn More" under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY Property Situation: • Near Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Rd. Development Details: • Generally the project is south of Southlake Blvd., in between Byron Nelson Pkwy. to the west and Carroll Ave. to the east on the south side of the future Zena Rucker Rd. • Presenter noted that in cooperation with the City, the culverts are going to be put in crossing this creek that will allow the road to put it for this project and there will only remain a small section for the completion of Zena Rucker Rd. • The existing zoning on the property is Agricultural • Presenter mentioned the future land use plan for this area is medium density residential • Application for zoning is for a PUD • Presenter noted the project is 8 lots on 5.3 acres all of the lots are over 20,000 square feet Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 1 o Could have zoned SF -20 but wanted to do things that would enhance the lots such as reducing setbacks to create a more intimate feel o Reducing the setbacks on the front, rear, and side yard would encourage and allow single story homes to be built Presenter mentioned the project has incorporated green space to the north which includes a walking trail that would tie into the trail on the north side of the Winding Creek development Presenter mentioned that on the east side of the property, the plan is to reduce the setbacks in order to incorporate existing trees into the project to preserve them Presenter noted that at the entrance to the subdivision the pathway contains a raised arbor on either side of the entrance; also there will be patterned concrete or paved stone at the entrance Details of the PUD are noted in the slides below Presented at SPIN: Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 2 E x S T N G Z N N G Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 3 Retail Office 71 NA R1 KI R Rig Medium Density Residential r � y .P�. MATTHEWS COURT ACRES: 5.3 (NET R.O.W.) HOMES: 8 DENSITY. 1.5 HOMES/NETAC SOUTHLARE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (>I HOME/ACRE) OPEN SPACE: 0.6 AC (10.3%) Ct P E N S P A C E D E S G N a V Development shall take place in accordance with Section 14 (SF -20A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALf DISTRICT) ofthe Southlake Zoning Ordinance, as amended, unless as otherwise identified below. L I. Matthews Com shall be developed in general accordance with the Concept Plan. 0 P 2. Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than 25', with an additional reduction of up to 25% M 16.5'1 for tree preservation. F 3. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than 10'. N T 4. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than 30', provided that on lots fronting on a cul-de- sac, there shall be a rear yard of not less than 25'. S T 5. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not A exceeding 40% of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 squarefeet. For purposes of this section, an unenclosed arborigazebo, which is not structurally N integrated into the primary building on the lot, shall not count towards the maximum lot coverage. D A 6. 'rhe right -0f -way for Matthews Court shall be 40' wide, as shown on the Concept Plan. However, the R right-of-way for the bulb of the cul-de-sac shall have a 50' radius. while the paving of the cul-de-sac D shall have a minimum 40' radius. S 7. The alignment of Matthews Courl shall be as shown on the Concept Plan, Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 5 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 6 QUESTIONS I CONCERNS: • The land to the west is a waterway; so that's always going to be green? o Area is owned by the school district and some portions are owned by Timarron as open space • How do you propose to fence between the yards and along the back line, especially on the eastern side? o The eastern side will be solid wooden fence — there will be wood fencing between the lots side-to-side. The fronts will have open style fencing, wrought iron fencing. • What size of home are you expecting to go onto these lots by square footage? You said you are going to PUD; explain what you get by going PUD? o The reason for doing PUD as opposed to SF -20, is it gives more flexibility on positioning and designing the house — many of these SF -20 lots, everybody has to go up. PUD allows the project to bring the houses forward. It also allows people the possibility of designing a single -story house. An advantage is that a PUD gives the City a right to say yes or no. We expect houses to be 3,500 square feet on up. Hesitant to dictate the house size. Probably will put a minimum on them. • Do you know if Zena Rucker has plans for the remaining land that is hers? o No — except for the commercial land. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public ofthe issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 7 Blackboard connect.. This message has been sent! Here is a summary of the delivery results. Click here to view more information online. Delivery Summary Title SPIN Town Hall Forum for 6/23/2015 Message Type Outreach Site CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Scheduled By PILAR SCHANK Send Time 06/17/2015 05:30 PM (CT) Voice Completed 06/17/2015 06:13 PM (CT) Text Completed 06/17/2015 05:32 PM (CT) Email Completed 06/17/2015 05:30 PM (CT) Selected Contacts 10764 Successfully reached 7538 (70%) Languages English* Device Deliveries 69%(7307) 10575 Com. 96%(155) 161 97%(544) 559 Detailed Delivery Results Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 8 Voice (listen) Good Afternoon this is Pilar Schank with the City of Southlake. A SPIN town hall forum will take place next Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at bpm concerning the following items. 1. SPIN2015-21: SPIN #9 will discuss the rezoning and re -plating of 13.8+ acres into 3 residential lots at 911 & 859 S. White Chapel Blvd. 2. SPIN2015-23: SPIN #9 will discuss the residential development of 8 lots on 5.8 acres of land near Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Road. 3. SPIN2015-22: The City of Southlake will discuss revisions to zoning ordinance 480, subdivision 483, and sign ordinance 704-G. Again, a SPIN Town Hall Forum will be held June 23, 2015 at bpm in the Town Hall Council Chamber. For more information go to City of Southlake. com Thank you for your attention. Have a great day. Successful Deliveries 69%(7307) Live Delivery 2767 Answering Machine 4540 Unsuccessful Deliveries 31%(3268) Hangup 48 FaWModem 333 Opted -Out 19 Undeliverable 617 Busy 55 No Answer 1824 Phone Network Busy 3 Bad Phone Number 372 Email A SPIN town hall forum will take place next Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at bpm concerning the following items. 1. SPIN2015-21: SPIN #9 will discuss the rezoning and re -plating of 13.8+ acres into 3 residential lots at 911 & 859 S. White Chapel Blvd. 2. SPIN2015-23: SPIN #9 will discuss the residential development of 8 lots on 5.8 acres of land near Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Road. 3. SPIN2015-22: The City of Southlake will discuss revisions to zoning ordinance 480, subdivision 483, an ... Email Sent 97% (544) Email Opted -Out 3%(15) SMS A SPIN town hall foram will take place next Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 6pm in the City Council Chamber. More information: http:llbit.ly11Bl6a r Text Email Sent 96%(155) Text Not Sent 2%(4) Text Opted -Out 1% (1) Invalid Text Phone 1% (1) For support, please call (866) 360-2155 or email connectsupport@blackboard.com Case No. Attachment D ZA15-070 Page 9 Case No.: ZA015-070 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Review No.: Two - Revised Date of Review: 09/28/15 Project Name: Development Plan — Matthews Court APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, LLC Owner: Landlock, LLC Tom Matthews Dale Clark 2600 E Southlake Blvd. #120-323 Southlake, Texas Phone: (214) 676-3434 Fax: (817) 481-4074 Email: tmatthews@fourpeaksdev.com 16390 Addison Rd. Addison, Texas 75001 Phone: (972) 931-8971 Fax: (972) 931-8975 Email: do@wcdevelopment.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/29/15 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. Planning Review Jerod Potts Planner I Phone: (817) 748-8195 E-mail: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us 1. Adjacent Lot 9 from the O W Knight Subdivision shows a Land Use Designation of Office Commercial. Please correct by changing this to Retail Commercial. 2. Clarify fencing to be provided along the rear yards of individual lots. Consider providing a fencing exhibit for the entire boundary of the project. Public Works/Engineering Review Alejandra Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8274 Fax: (817) 748-8077 E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre -construction, construction and post -construction erosion control measures. NEW REQUIREMENT: SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. 4. Retaining walls greater than 4 -feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. Case No. Attachment E ZA15-070 Page 1 5. Verify curve data of C2. Minimum radii for a C2U collector is 400 -feet. Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. 2. Verify corner clips at the intersection of Zena Rucker Road and Matthews Court to allow for a 30' minimum radius. Corner clips shall be shown on the plat. Refer to Ordinance No. 483. Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Extend sanitary sewer to the eastern property line and provide sewer stub to adjacent property. Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. Water and sanitary sewer lines in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Detailed hydrology and hydraulic analysis shall be required with Civil Construction Plan review to determine if detention will be required. Models shall incorporate Teagues, Nall & Perkins effective models (HMS and RAS). Any changes to the site plan may require a revision to the concept plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. 2. Detailed hydrology and hydraulic analysis shall be required to determine limits of flood plain reclamation using effective models from Teagues, Nall & Perkins (HMS and RAS). Determination of finish floor elevations for lots adjacent to flood plain is contingent upon detailed study. Case No. Attachment E ZA15-070 Page 2 3. Finish floor elevations of lots adjacent to flood plain shall be 2 -feet above the base flood elevations of the channel. 4. Limits of the 100- year floodplain shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage easement. 5. Clearly label all private and public storm lines. * Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets. * Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. * Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #23 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($309.83/Acre). * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways to be constructed with this development. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. * The developer of the Matthews Court development is requesting that the City of Southlake consider reprioritizing the construction of the Zena Rucker Road Project indicated in the Mobility Plan developed as part of the Southlake 2030 Comprehensive plan. In other words, the developer feels that the completion of the section of Zena Rucker Drive (Tier 3) between Tower Blvd. and the existing Zena Rucker Drive will provide value to the citizens of Southlake. In addition, the developer has notified the City of the interest of the adjacent property owner (Mrs. Zena Rucker) to dedicate a portion of the right of way required for the construction of this segment of roadway. Another piece of the necessary right of way will also be required from the adjacent "hospital" tract in order to complete this roadway connection. *=Denotes informational comment. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Case No. Attachment E ZA15-070 Page 3 Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us II:7NI; Kde]k14NI li%IEel kWe] LY, ILY, INIkIII &I Most of the existing trees on the site are pioneering tree species that have grown on the site in the past 5 to 10 years. They consist of Hackberry, Cedar Elm, and American Elm which are multi - trunked or in clusters that sprouted after being brush hogged and then left to grow. The most prominent quality trees are along the west property boundary of the property where they are proposed to be preserved. The Developer has also chosen the most prominent quality trees in the interior of the property to preserve. The proposed zoning for the development is Residential Planned Unit Development, R -PUD. The submitted Tree Conservation Plan falls 5.7% short of complying with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance To mitigate the removal the applicant is proposing to provide eighty (80") caliper inches of landscape trees in the open space, and a minimum of twenty-four (24") caliper inches of shade trees and two (2) understory trees will be planted on each lot when a house is built. A minimum total of two -hundred -seventy-two (272") of new trees will be planted throughout the development. There is 39.8% of existing tree cover on the site and 60% of that existing tree cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 54.3% of the existing tree cover. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S -P-1 Site Plan, S -P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the Case No. Attachment E ZA15-070 Page 4 approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 Fax: (817) 748-8181 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: No comments based on submitted plans. Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager Phone: (817) 748-8607 Fax: (817) 748-8027 E-mail: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $3000 per dwelling unit x 8 dwelling units= $24,000.00 . Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right -Of -Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. The following should be informational comments only No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. Case No. Attachment E ZA15-070 Page 5 Existing overhead utilities will need to be relocated. All new franchise utilities must be placed underground and ground equipment screened in accordance with Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 Section 8.05. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, fully corrected plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Water & Sewer, Roadway Impact, Critical Drainage Structure Fees, Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. This development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of offsite R.O.W. and construction of a portion of Zena Rucker Road. Park Fees and Road/Bridge Improvements credits or reimbursements are matters subject to approval of a Developer's Agreement by City Council. When a Final Plat is filed it will be required to tie down the Pedestrian Access Easement by metes and bounds. Please be aware that sidewalk design standards need to meet those in Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 Section 5.06. Denotes Informational Comment cc Case No. Attachment E ZA15-070 Page 6 Surrounding Property Owners 80] ]11 ]31 641 ]21 ]]1 601 631 �3 011 621 605 B 050 1 1100 6 -AE BLVD 035 1201 1221 1 1 —ZENA RUCKJR RD 008 SPO # M Owner Zoning Land Use 225 229 30 305 309 33 Response 1. _ WOOD50 WAY AG Office Commercial 224 220 3 304 'LCC^Q 2. 10001004100EVE 1 al 101610201D24 SP1 Office Commercial EVE GRE 1 F] M1 — 3. 8 008 SPO # M Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response 1. Zelda Partners Ltd AG Office Commercial 6.7 NR 2. Hcp Crs2 Ltach-Baylor Southlak SP1 Office Commercial 4.5 NR 3. Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr AG Medium Density Residential 4.2 NR 4. Timarron Owners Assn Inc RPUD Medium Density Residential 5.8 NR 5. Carroll ISD RPUD Public/Semi-Public 15.8 NR 6. Devane Clarke Partnership Ltd SP2 Office Commercial 2.3 NR 7. Landlock Llc AG Medium Density Residential 4.2 NR 8. Weatherford Loan Company SP1 Office Commercial 4.2 NR 9. Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr AG Medium Density Residential 50.4 NR Hayes, Billy W Etux Carolyn AG Office Commercial 2.9 O 11. Rucker, Zena Sullivan AG Office Commercial 1.8 NR 12. Noorneel Llc SPI Retail Commercial 1.9 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA15-070 Page 1 13. Superintendent of Carroll ISD - - - NR 14. Superintendent of Grapevine Colleyville ISD - - NR 15. Superintendent of Northwest ISD - - - NR 16. Superintendent of Keller ISD - - - NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Responses Received: In Favor: (0) Opposed To: (1) Undecided: (0) No Response: (15) Case No. Attachment F ZA15-070 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owner Responses JjI-?9-Z!Q!a +.' :'= I.'9 Fr.!:-- - Se---hlzie 817-420-5570 Notjfioa qq 1 i form W&M #1lodon2 Onto: Auquat e. 2016 Rt 6:34 PIVD L Ell1Y W BW Carolyn PC Box S�Kolalaa `4X 76 ff pLE E PRCVIDI_ COMPLETED FORMS VIA EEML, FAY, OR 14AND DELNERY BEFORE 'TETE OTART OF THi: SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEAFUNG. Sdng the ower(a) of fhe rty so noted abmm, ore hweby in ta" of :OPL�19-d-Drl undecided about (circla or under one) the proposed Zoning Change ami Dwelopmenrt Plan mf mwA3dl 2bove. Spaue tbr ovmmwte regarding your position: Siignatuie: AdMonai Sign Pdnted U uwoto we id UJ. *hone Number (optional): Dates :71a' e r Date: -3a-14r tam Case No. Attachment G ZA15-070 Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-701 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS OF TRACTS 3D, 3D2 AND 3, OBEDIAH W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.8 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "RPUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District Case No. Attachment H ZA15-070 Page 2 under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of Case No. Attachment H ZA15-070 Page 3 those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 5.8 acres, and more fully and completely described in exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District as depicted on the approved development plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", Case No. Attachment H ZA15-070 Page 4 and subject to the following conditions: MATTHEWS COURT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Reserved for approved Development Regulations CITY COUNCIL MOTION AT 1ST READING AUGUST 18, 2015 Approved (7-0) Ordinance No. 480-701 (ZA15-070) 1St Reading Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court subject to staff report dated August 11, 2015 and development plan review summary #2 dated July 31, 2015. CITY COUNCIL MOTION AT 2ND READING OCTOBER 6, 2015 Reserved for approved City Council 2„d Reading Motion SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets, to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, Case No. Attachment H ZA15-070 Page 5 water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such Case No. Attachment H ZA15-070 Page 6 accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1St reading the 18th day of August, 2015. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 6th day of October, 2015. Case No. ZA15-070 Attachment H Page 7 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. ZA15-070 Attachment H Page 8 EXHIBIT "A" Case No. Attachment H ZA15-070 Page 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHEREAS Landlock, LLC is the owner of a parcel of land located in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, a part of the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract Number 899, and being a part of that called 4.2 acre tract of land described in deed to Landlock, LLC as recorded in Document Number D212307446, Tarrant County Deed Records, and also being all of Tract 1- called 0.434 acres and all of Tract 2 -called 1.216 acres described in deed to Landlock, LLC as recorded in Document Number D215081837, Tarrant County Deed Records, and being further described as follows: BEGINNING at a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBI" found at the northeast comer of said Tract 1, said point also being in the north line of that called 4.2259 acre tract of land described in deed to William W. Rucker and Zena Rucker as recorded in Document Number D205046160, Tarrant County Deed Records, said point also being in the south line of that called 6.777 acre tract of land described in deed to Zelda Partners, LTD as recorded in Document Number D212310146, Tarrant County Deed Records; THENCE South 01 degrees 11 minutes 59 seconds East, at 324.58 feet passing a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBI" found at the south comer of said Tract 1, said point also being the north comer of Tract B -called 0.086 acres described in deed to Zena Rucker as recorded in Document Number D215081834, Tarrant County Deed Records, in all a total distance of 628.00 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBI" found at the southeast comer of said Tract 2; THENCE South 88 degrees 48 minutes 01 seconds West, 405.01 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBI" found at the southwest corner of said Tract 2, said point also being in the east line of Lot 1, Block 60, Timarron Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3674, Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE North 01 degrees 14 minutes 58 seconds West, 105.24 feet along the east line of said Lot 1, Block 60 to a five-eighths inch iron rod found for corner, said point being the northwest comer of said Tract 2, said point also being the southwest corner of said 4.2 acre tract; THENCE along the west line of said 4.2 acre tract as follows: North 01 degrees 12 minutes 28 seconds West, 296.78 feet to a one-half inch iron rod found at the northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 60, said point also being the southeast comer of Lot 9 of the O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4650, Tarrant County Plat Records; North 01 degrees 04 minutes 00 seconds West, 218.12 feet along the east line of said Lot 9 to a one-half inch iron rod found at the northwest comer of said 4.2 acre tract; MATzHEWS COURT Case No. Attachment H ZA15-070 Page 10 THENCE along the north line of said 4.2 acre tract as follows: North 87 degrees 34 minutes 17 seconds East, 140.18 feet to a three-quarter inch iron rod found for corner, said point being the southwest comer of that called 3.14 acre tract of land described in deed to Billy W. Hayes and wife Carolyn J. Hayes as recorded in Volume 6551, Page 938, Tarrant County Deed Records; North 87 degrees 31 minutes 24 seconds East, 147.96 feet to a one-half inch iron rod found for corner, said point being the northwest corner of said Tract 1, said point being the southeast corner of said 3.14 acre tract, said point also being the southwest corner of said 6.777 acre tract; THENCE North 88 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds East, 116.58 feet along the north line of said Tract 1 and the south line of said 6.777 acre tract to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 252,901 square feet or 5.806 acres of land. MARK W HARP ..� � ..... •6425 F MATTHEWS COURT Case No. Attachment H ZA15-070 Page 11 EXHIBIT "B" Reserved for approved Development Plan Case No. Attachment H ZA15-070 Page 12