Loading...
Item 6B Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T September 8, 2015 CASE NO: ZA15-034 PROJECT: Specific Use Permit for a Telecommunications Tower, Antennas and Ancillary Buildings at 1604 Hart Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: PI Telecom Infrastructure V, Inc is requesting approval of a Specific Use Permit for a telecommunication tower, antennas and ancillary buildings to be located at 1604 SPIN #8 Hart Street on approximately 3.7 acres. DETAILS: PI Telecom Infrastructure V, Inc. is seeking approval of a specific use permit for the installation of a telecommunications tower with 3 options ranging in height from approximately 80-feet to 95-feet tall. 90 ft. (95-ft. with branches) 80 ft. Monument 95 ft. Stealth Monopine with 48-inch Pole with 42-inch with 3-sided base and the monopine diameter pole 10-foot side panels branches range from 2-5- feet in length At the May 21, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant proposed to locate an 125-foot telecommunication tower between two (2) existing industrial buildings (1610 and 1612 Hart Street) with capacity of up to four (4) antenna structures. The Commission suggested that the applicant move the tower location further south from the original location. At the June 4, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant Case No. ZA15-034 revised the location of the tower to the south side of the building located at 1612 Hart Street. The proposed tower was a 125-foot monopine tower with a ground equipment platform and an eight foot fencecrete enclosure with shrubs. See Attachment C, page 5 for the previous site plan. Based on the discussions at the June 4, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant requested to be tabled until the August 20, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. At the August 20, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant brought forth a revised site plan and elevations for the site. The applicant proposed to maintain the location of the tower at the south end of the building at 1612 Hart Street adjacent to the right-of-way. The base diameter was reduced to 48-inches removing one of the variances. The equipment fencing and equipment shelter will remain the same. The previously proposed monopine tower was be reduced in height from 125-feet to 90-feet (95-feet overall with branches). The applicant proposed three (3) options for consideration. The options included: 1. A 90-foot monopine (preferred): The overall height will be 95-feet with branches at the top of the pole. 2. An 80-foot monument: The monument has a steel frame with a “stealth” skin made from a carbon fiber compound that can be painted or textured to resemble concrete or brick, but remains translucent to radio waves. Each side panel is approximately 10-foot wide. Inside the monument is a smaller diameter steel monopole serving as the mounting structure for antennas. 3. A 95-foot stealth pole: The stealth pole has a 42 –inch diameter base and a steel skin up to the 60 foot elevation. The top part of the pole is a series of stealth skin carbon fiber panels painted to match the color of the external steel on the bottom part of the pole. Inside the stealth pole is a smaller diameter steel monopole serving as the mounting structure for antennas with canisters containing the antennas. Additional information is available on these options in Attachment C, page 14. The applicant has requested two variances for the new tower proposal: Variances: 1. Tower Location: The City’s Zoning Ordinance requires that towers shall be located in such a manner that if the structure should fall along its longest dimension, it will remain within property boundaries and avoid habitable structures, public streets, utility lines and other telecommunication towers. The maximum 95-foot tower is currently located 30-feet from a utility easement to the east, 45-feet from the property line and located 20-feet from the front property line to the south. The proposed towers, at the longest dimension, are approximately 95-feet. 2. Antenna Platform Size: The Zoning Ordinance permits a maximum of a 4- foot depth on each antenna platform. The monopine platforms will be approximately 6-foot in depth as the antennas are clustered on the pole within the branching structure in order to conceal the antennas. The other two options would not require this variance. Case No. ZA15-034 Comparison of Regulations and Variances The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial (5-0) of the Specific Specific Regulations for Telecommunication 00Variance Monopine 95 ft. Monument 80 ft. Stealth 95 ft. Towers, Antennas & Ancillary Buildings Side Property line: 45 ft. Side Property line: 45 ft. Side Property line: 45 ft. (50 (50 ft. variance) (35 ft. variance) ft. variance) Setback for Fall Zone within Property 95 ft. max. required Front Property Line: 20 ft. Front Property Line: 20 ft. Front Property Line: 20 ft. Boundaries to avoid (monopine and stealth) (75 ft. variance) (60 ft. variance) (75 ft. variance) Habitable Structures, Public Streets, Utility (80 ft. max. for Utility line: 30 ft. (65 ft. Utility line: 30 ft. (50 ft. Utility line: 30 ft. (65 ft. Lines and other monument) variance) variance) variance) Telecommunication Towers Building Setback: 5 ft. Building Setback: 5 ft. (75 Building Setback: 5 ft. (90 ft. variance) ft. variance) (90 ft. variance) Antenna Platform NA 4 ft. maximum Monopine: 6 ft. depth NA Monopine Only Use Permit request. For the September 15, 2015 City Council meeting, the applicant has not made any changes to the proposal presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission at the August 20, 2015 meeting. The applicant is seeking approval of one of the 3 tower options; the 90-foot monopine pole, the 80-foot monument tower or the 95-foot stealth pole. The 20 foot by 60 foot fencing enclosure will be surrounded by an 8- foot fencecrete perimeter fence on the south and east, an existing building on the north and a 20-foot by 8-foot wrought iron gate to the west with shrubs on 4-foot centers. An additional 4 canopy trees and 12 accents trees are required for the bufferyard. Section 45.7 d. 2) of the Special Use Permits requires the following: Co-location and Availability of Suitable Existing Towers and Other Structures a) No new tower shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates to the city that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant’s proposed antenna. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant’s proposed antenna may consist of any of the following: i) No existing towers or structures are located within the geographic area required to meet applicant’s engineering requirements. ii) Existing towers or structures are not of sufficient height to meet applicant’s engineering requirements. iii) Existing towers or structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support applicant’s proposed antenna and related equipment. iv) The applicant’s proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing towers or structures would cause interference with the applicant’s proposed antenna. v) The fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner in order to share the existing tower or structure or to adapt an existing tower or structure Case No. ZA15-034 sharing are unreasonable. Costs exceed new tower development are presumed to be unreasonable. vi) The applicant demonstrates that there are other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures unsuitable. Due to the opposition in excess of 20% of the land area within 200-feet of the subject property (currently 61.55%), a super majority vote is required in order to approve this item. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct Public Hearing 2) Consider Specific Use Permit for a Telecommunication Tower Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information – Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) SPIN Report from April 28, 2015 (E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 6, dated September 1, 2015 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map (G) Surrounding Property Owner Responses (H) Resolution No. 15-028 STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Patty Moos (817) 748-8269 Case No. ZA15-034 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS: Boyle Family Partnership APPLICANT: PI telecom Infrastructure V, Inc. PROPERTY SITUATION: 1604 Hart Street (1610 and 1612 Hart Street) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block A of the Hart Industrial Park Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial CURRENT ZONING: “I-1” Light Industrial District HISTORY: May 17, 1988; City Council approve a Preliminary Plat for Hart Industrial Park June 7, 1988; City Council approved a zoning change for the Hart Industrial Park. July 5, 1988; City Council approved a Final Plat for Lots 1-4, Block A and Lots 1-5, Block B of the Hart Industrial Park. The existing four buildings were constructed between 1997 and 2000. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: This request does not affect traffic on or around the property. The only traffic generated by the applicant’s request is typical maintenance and service to the tower and cabinets. TREE PRESERVATION: No trees will be affected by the request. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: May 21, 2015; Approved (4-0) the motion to table to the June 4, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting per the applicant’s request. June 4, 2015; Approved (6-0) the motion to table to the August 20, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting per the applicant’s request. August 20, 2015; Approved (5-0) the motion to deny ZA15-034. STAFF COMMENTS: Site Plan Review Summary No. 6 dated September 1, 2015, is located under Attachment E of this staff report. \\\\SLKSV1057\\THLocal\\Community Development\\MEMO\\2015 Cases\\034 - SUP - Telecommunications 1610 Hart Case No. Attachment A ZA15-034 Page 1 Case No. Attachment B ZA15-034 Page 1 Plans and Support Information Previously Proposed Site Plan 5-21-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 1 Previously Proposed Elevation 5-21-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 2 Previously Proposed Existing Landscaping 5-21-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 3 Photographs 5-21-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 4 Proposed Revised Tower Overall Site Plan 6-4-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 5 Proposed Site Plan 6-4-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 6 Revised East Elevation 6-4-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 7 Proposed Landscape 6-4-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 8 Revised Photographs 6-4-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 9 Telecommunication Tower at Timberline Court and E. Continental Boulevard View Southwest to Timberline Court and E. Continental Blvd. View South to Timberline Court from E. Continental Blvd. View West to Timberline Court and E. Continental Blvd. Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 10 Proposed Site Plan 8-20-15 (P&Z ) and 9-15-15 (CC) Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 11 Proposed Elevations 8-20-15 (P&Z) and 9-15-15 (CC) Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 12 Proposed Narrative 8-20-15 (P&Z) and 9-15-15 (CC) Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 13 90 ft. Monopine with 48-inch base 80 ft. Monument 95 ft. Stealth Pole The monopine branches range 3-sided structure with 42-inch diameter pole from 2-5-feet in length 10-foot side panels Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 14 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 16 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 17 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 18 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 19 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 20 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 21 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 22 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 23 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 24 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 25 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 26 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 27 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 28 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 29 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 30 Additional Narrative from email dated 8-12-15: Variances: 1. Most of our variances are set back variances. With a tower no greater than 95 feet tall, the required fall zone, and therefore, the required set backs are also 95 feet. We are asking for the following setbacks: a. 45 foot setback from side property line (50 foot fall zone variance.) b. 20 foot setback from front property line (75 foot fall zone variance and 10 foot front yard variance). c. 30 foot setback from utility easement ( 65 foot fall zone variance.) d. 5 foot setback from the building (90 foot fall zone variance) 2. The other variance deals with antenna platform size. Since we are seeking approval of a stealth structure, we are seeking exemption from strict platform dimensions. (the maximum of the platform depth is 4-feet). Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 31 Additional Narrative 8-20-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 32 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 33 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 34 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 35 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 36 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 37 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 38 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 39 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 40 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 41 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 42 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 43 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 44 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 45 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 46 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 47 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 48 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 49 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 50 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 51 Proposed Site Plan 8-20-15 Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 52 Proposed Elevations Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 53 Engineer’s Letter Case No. Attachment C ZA15-034 Page 54 SPIN MEETING REPORT Case Number: SPIN Item Number: SPIN2015-12 Project Name: Monopole Communications Tower SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #8 Meeting Date: April 28, 2015 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: 17 Host: Sherry Berman, Community Engagement Committee Applicant(s) Presenting: Doug Henderson, representing Parallel Infrastructure City Staff Present: Jerod Potts, Planner I City Staff Contact: Patty Moos, Planner I (817) 748-8269 Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on “Learn More” under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY Property Situation:  1610 Hart St. Development Details:  Seeking approval for SUP for a wireless telecommunications monopole at 1610 Hart Street  Proposing installation of a steel pole which would be approximately 120 feet tall  Presenter noted the antennas on top of the pole would improve wireless phone signals, including the irregular 911 signal in the surrounding area  Presenter mentioned that although the property at 1610 Hart is zoned Industrial, a Specific Use Permit is required for any telecom pole installation in the City of Southlake  Presenter mentioned that more than 80% of 9-1-1 calls are made from wireless phones  The presenter noted the location needed to be situated in a commercial or industrial location but would still meet City of Southlake design criteria. Presenter said that the site at 1610 Hart street is Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 1 situated between two existing industrial buildings in the Hart Industrial Park in a 20 foot by 60 foot space.  Presenter mentioned the ground equipment would hidden from view from anyone outside and the tower that would be standing up would be near tall trees which would soften that view from the outside  The presenter mentioned the large tree buffer zone that already exists for the site on the east side  Presenter referenced a photo simulation (attached below) that illustrated the potential view of the tower from Tealwood Court and mentioned the existing tree line north of the industrial park and the existing homes in the area cover a lot of the view  Presenter referenced a photo simulation (attached below) of a view from the Hart and Brumlow intersection Presented at SPIN: Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 2 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 3 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 4 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 5 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 6 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 7 Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 8 QUESTIONS / CONCERNS:  Average telephone pole is about 40 feet, average 2-story house in the City is about 35 feet, your pole is going to be 120 feet, there will be about 60 feet of tower visible above the trees that will be visible in the City skyline Homes are a little more than 35 feet tall and whether you see the tower is in relation to o where you are. Simulations are based on an engineer’s calculations of where they would be. If you were referencing the tower in relation to the existing trees you would see 50-60 feet of the pole above the trees. If you are right next to the trees they would hide the pole  Are you purchasing the property in between or will the owner of those two pieces of property sublet the land to you so that then becomes a commercial investment for them? This is a lease however the owner does have a participating position in this development in o that they receive a portion of subleases that might be on this. It is a long-term, 30-year lease  So the tower is privately owned and leased to the FCC? That is correct. The pole and the equipment are privately owned by Parallel Infrastructure o and their leasing the ground space from the property owner  Do you plan to meet with any of the home owners in Tealwood specifically or possibly over off Warwick which is part of Timarron off of Brumlow? The closest subdivision is Tealwood and it is my desire to meet with property owners in the o Tealwood Addition before the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 9  The only thing taller than about 40 feet right now are water towers and church steeples so your pole changes some of the City skyline There is an existing pole on East Continental that is taller than this pole o  Is it a functional pole? I contacted the site owner and was unable to determine that. Looked at the site and was o unable to determine whether the antennas were active antennas or old ones  Have you located any other down areas in the Southlake area that you would propose another pole in the future? There are areas that have the same problem – this is the first one for Parallel Infrastructure. o  How far is the average pole cover in distance? Our search areas are never larger than a quarter-mile radius. o SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA15-034 Page 10 SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REVIEW SUMMARY ZA15-034Six09/01/15 Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review: SPECIFIC USE PERMIT Project Name: –Telecommunications Tower-1610 Hart Street APPLICANT: PI Telecom Infrastructure V, Inc. OWNER: Boyle Family Partnership Contact: Doug Henderson 4601 Touchton Road, Bldg. 300, Ste. 3200 3301 Westover Court Jacksonville, FL 32246 Grapevine, TX 76051-6859 Phone: 817-729-7006 Phone: 817-994-1702 Email: dougger@airmail.net CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/3/2015 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. Planning Review Patty Moos Planner I Phone: (817) 748-8269 Email: pmoos@ci.southlake.tx.us 1. All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations. 2. Towers shall be located in such a manner that if the structure should fall along its longest dimension, it will remain within property boundaries and avoid habitable structures, public streets, The applicant has requested a variance to this utility lines and other telecommunication towers. requirement. The applicant has requested a variance to this 3. Antenna Platforms must not exceed 4-foot depth. requirement. 4. Provide plantings for a F2 bufferyard around the perimeter of the enclosure as required in the Section 42, Bufferyards and Section 45.7 d. 8) c) Specific Use Permits of the Zoning Ordinance. It appears that 4 canopies trees, 8 accent trees and 12 shrubs are required. Informational Comments  Section 45.7d 5. Building Codes; Safety Standards a) After receiving the appropriate zoning approval, no tower, antenna, or other appurtenance shall be installed without first obtaining a building permit issued by the Building Official. b) To ensure the structural integrity of towers, the owner of a tower shall ensure that the tower is constructed and maintained in compliance with standards contained in applicable local building codes (“Uniform Building Codes, UBC”) and applicable standards for towers, published by the Electronics Industries Association Standard 222, (“EIA-222") “Structural Standards for Steel Antenna towers and Antenna Support Structures.” Case No. Attachment E ZA15-034 Page 1 c) A tower inspection report (based upon applicable UBC and EIA-222 standards) shall 45-11 be prepared by an engineer licensed in the state of Texas and filed with the Building Official in accordance to the following schedule: a) monopoles--at least once every ten (10) years; b) lattice towers--at least once every (5) years; and c) guyed towers--at least once every three (3) years. However, the Building Official may require an immediate inspection should an issue of safety be raised. d) If, upon inspection, the tower fails to comply with such codes and standards and constitutes a danger to persons or property, then upon notice being provided to the owner of the tower, the owner shall have thirty (30) days to bring such tower into compliance with such standards, unless the applicant can demonstrate a hardship and thus establish the need for additional time. If the owner fails to bring such tower into compliance within said thirty (30) days, the city shall remove such tower at the owner’s expense.  At a tower site, the design of the buildings and related structures shall, to the extent 45-13 possible, use materials, colors, and textures that will comply with the materials permitted by the underlying zoning district and shall blend with the natural setting and any existing structures on the site, or the equipment building shall be contained entirely within a main building on the property, or the equipment building shall be housed in an underground vault.  Highly reflective surfaces shall not be permitted. No glare shall be emitted to adjacent properties.  All exterior wires and/or cables necessary for operation of the antenna shall be placed underground, whenever practicable, except for wires or cables attached flush with the surface of a building or the structure of the antenna.  No permanent lighting is allowed on towers except as required by the FCC or the FAA (i.e., red lights by night/white strobe lighting during the day).  Any temporary lighting shall be oriented inward so as not to project onto surrounding residential property.  After receiving the appropriate zoning approval, no tower, antenna, or other appurtenance shall be installed without first obtaining a building permit issued by the Building Official.  To ensure the structural integrity of towers, the owner of a tower shall ensure that the tower is constructed and maintained in compliance with standards contained in applicable local building codes (“Uniform Building Codes, UBC”) and applicable standards for towers, published by the Electronics Industries Association Standard 222, (“EIA-222") “Structural Standards for Steel Antenna towers and Antenna Support Structures.”  A tower inspection report (based upon applicable UBC and EIA-222 standards) shall be prepared by an engineer licensed in the state of Texas and filed with the Building Official in accordance to the following schedule: a) monopoles--at least once every ten (10) years; b) lattice towers--at least once every (5) years; and c) guyed towers--at least once every three (3) years. However, the Building Official may require an immediate inspection should an issue of safety be raised.  If, upon inspection, the tower fails to comply with such codes and standards and constitutes a danger to persons or property, then upon notice being provided to the owner of the tower, the owner shall have thirty (30) days to bring such tower into compliance with such standards, unless the applicant can demonstrate a hardship and thus establish the need for additional time. If the owner fails to bring such tower into compliance within said thirty (30) days, the city shall remove such tower at the owner’s expense. Case No. Attachment E ZA15-034 Page 2  Existing mature tree growth and natural land forms on the site shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. In some cases, such as towers sited on large, wooded lots, natural growth around the property perimeter may be sufficient buffer. Mitigation of any tree removal shall be in accordance to the Tree Preservation Ordinance, as amended.  Equipment structures shall be of minimum size to house transmitting/receiving equipment and shall not be utilized for offices, vehicle storage, or for any other use other than for transmitting and receiving transmissions. No outside storage shall be permitted on the site.  No more than three (3) separate equipment buildings shall be located on a single lot.  No lettering, symbols, images, or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of vehicular traffic on any adjacent roadway shall be placed on, or affixed to, any part of a telecommunications tower, platform, antenna or ancillary structure.  If high voltage is necessary, signs shall be posted every 20' on any exterior fencing which state, “Danger--High Voltage.” The operator shall also post “No Trespassing” signs.  The owner of a tower and/or related telecommunications facilities shall notify the Building Official when the tower or other structures have ceased operating as part of a telecommunications system authorized by the FCC. Within six (6) months of the date the tower ceases to operate as part of an authorized telecommunications system, the tower must either be removed from the site, or a certificate of occupancy must be obtained to allow another permitted use of the tower. If within six (6) months, the owner fails to remove the tower or obtain proper authorization for the use of the tower, the Building Official shall revoke the certificate of occupancy for the tower and notify the city attorney to pursue enforcement remedies.  Tower owner(s) shall bear all demolition costs.  Section 45.4 General Requirements for Specific Use Permits: a. Any use permitted hereunder shall meet the minimum requirements provided in the district in which it is located. b. A specific use permit shall automatically expire if a building permit is not issued and construction begun within six (6) months of the granting of the specific use permit or if the use shall cease for a period of six (6) months. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us * No comments. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 Case No. Attachment E ZA15-034 Page 3 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: No comments based on submitted information. General Informational Comments * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 26, I-1 Light Industrial District and Section 45 Specific Use Permits. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZA15-034 Page 4 Surrounding Property Owners SPO # Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response Belle-View Enterprise Llc I1 1217 BRUMLOW AVE 0.94 1. NR Lago Del Sur Llc I1 1605 HART ST 3.37 2. NR 1595 Hart Street Llc I1 1595 HART ST 1.00 3. NR Diles, Richard L & Alice M SP1 1219 BRUMLOW AVE 1.02 4. NR Tang, Eric Etux Susan Hsieh TZD 1105 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 5. O Evans, Benton L Etux Stephanie TZD 1137 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 6. O Herzog/Lease Partners Ltd I1 1594 HART ST 1.36 7. O Wright, Joe L AG 1719 E CONTINENTAL BLVD 31.81 8. O Boyle Family Partnership I1 1604 HART ST 1.48 9. F Boyle Family Partnership I1 1600 HART ST 0.99 10. F C & L Capital Investments Llc TZD 1112 TEALWOOD CT 0.33 11. NR C & L Capital Investments Llc TZD 1116 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 12. O C & L Capital Investments Llc TZD 1120 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 13. O Llano Durango Capital Llc/ 14. Baillargeon, Ann TZD 1124 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 O Ducey, Christopher Etux Lisa F TZD 1128 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 15. O C & L Capital Investments Llc TZD 1130 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 16. NR Llano Durango Capital Llc TZD 1132 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 17. O Llano Durango Capital Llc TZD 1136 TEALWOOD CT 0.23 18. O Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent:Sixteen (16) Responses Received:In Favor: 2 Opposed: 10 Undecided: 0 Opposition outside 200 ft.: 29 In favor outside 200 ft.: 3 Case No. Attachment F ZA14-034 Page 1 Within 200 ft. of Property Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 1 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 2 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 3 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 4 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 5 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 6 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 7 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 8 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 9 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 10 Outside 200 ft. of property Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 11 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 12 From: Date: To: Ame Beanland <amebean@mac.com> June 3, 2015 at 8:25:19 PM CDT kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us, parodriguez@ci.southlake.tx.us, aortowski@ci.southlake.tx.us, jkjones@ci.southlake.tx.us, pschank@ci.southlake.tx.us, bthatcher@ci.southlake.tx.us, Subject: NO cell phone tower on Continental syelverton@ci.southlake.tx.us, lpayne@ci.southlake.tx.us Blvd. Southlake I VEHEMENTLY OPPOSE THE CELL PHONE TOWER ON CONTINENTAL We have enough to combat in our environment — pesticides, mosquito spraying, airline traffic pollutants, general pollution, allergens, etc. Seriously? I CHALLENGE YOU TO STAND UP FOR SOUTHLAKE, protect us, advocate for us DO YOUR JOB. I don’t care how many calls I drop—I choose health for myself and my family over convenience. —Ame Beanland 704 Manchester Ct Southlake, Texas 76092 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 13 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 14 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 15 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 16 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 17 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 18 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 19 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 20 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 21 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 22 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 23 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 24 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 25 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 26 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 27 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 28 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 29 Case No. Attachment G ZA15-034 Page 30 RESOLUTION NO. 15-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER, ANTENNAS AND ANCILLARY BUILDINGSON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, LOCATED AT 1610 HART STREET, BEING DESCRIBED AS ADDITION AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “A” AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS , a Specific Use Permit for Telecommunications Tower, Antennas and Ancillary Buildingshas been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the zoned as “I-1” Light Industrial District; and, WHEREAS , in accordance with the requirements of Section 45.1 (45) and 45.17 of the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS , the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for a telecommunication tower, antennas and ancillary buildings on property located at 1610 Hart Street, being described asLot 4, Block A of the Hart Industrial Park Addition as depicted on the approved Site Exhibit attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A” and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions Case No. Attachment H ZA15-034 Page 1 contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS _____th DAY OF September, 2015. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Lori Payne City Secretary Case No. Attachment H ZA15-034 Page 2 EXHIBIT ‘A” Plans and Support Information Case No. Attachment H ZA15-034 Page 3