Item 6F
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
August 25, 2015
CASE NO: ZA15-071
PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Matthews Court
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
On behalf of Landlock LLC, Four Peaks Development, LLC is requesting approval of a
Preliminary Plat for Matthews Court on property described as portions of Tracts 3D,
3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, and located at 851 and 841 E Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave.,
Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “AG” Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: “R-
PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN Neighborhood #9
DETAILS:
Four Peaks Development, LLC is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for
Matthews Court for the development of eight (8) residential lots and two (2) open
space lots on approximately 5.8 acres. The applicant is also requesting a Zoning
Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court from the current “AG” Agricultural
Zoning District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District.
The Preliminary Plat is related to and being processed concurrently with a Zoning
Change and Development Plan application under Planning Case No. ZA15-070.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Consider Preliminary Plat Approval Request
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information – Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) SPIN Meeting Report
(E) Review Summary No. 2, dated July 31, 2015
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(G) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
for City Council Only
(H) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Jerod Potts (817) 748-8195
Case No.
ZA15-071
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER:
Landlock, LLC
APPLICANT:
Four Peaks Development, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION:
851, 841 E. Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING:
“AG” Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING:
“R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District
HISTORY:
There is no development history at the project site
CITIZEN INPUT:
A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for this project on June 23, 2015 at
Southlake Town Hall. A SPIN Meeting Report is included as Attachment “D” of
this report.
SOUTHLAKE 2030:
Consolidated Future Land Use
The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use
Plan designates this property as
Medium Density Residential. As
proposed, this development is
consistent with the Future Land Use
Plan. The image to the right illustrates
the Future Land Use for the proposed
location.
Master Thoroughfare Plan
Zena Rucker Road currently does not
connect between Byron Nelson
Parkway and Carroll Avenue. Access
to this proposed subdivision is
contingent upon the construction of Zena Rucker Road, which according to the
Southlake Master Thoroughfare Plan is designated as a 2-lane collector (C2U)
with a minimum 60’ R.O.W. required. A minimum radius of 400’ and minimum
tangent length of 50’ between curves is required per Subdivision Ordinance
No. 483. This development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of
offsite R.O.W. and construction of a portion of Zena Rucker Road. Note, the
applicant is not proposing to finish the connection of Zena Rucker Road
between Byron Nelson Parkway and Carroll Avenue; the street is proposed to
stub approximately leaving 600’ to the nearest cross street to the east.
Mobility Master Plan
The Mobility Master Plan recommends the extension of Zena Rucker Road
east to S. Carroll Avenue. Below is the recommendation as written within the
Mobility Master Plan. The proposal for Matthews Court states that in
conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the
neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these
culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-071 Page 1
will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower
Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S.
Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway.
Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
Ref. Implementation VGO Priority Responsible
Issues Recommendations Strategic Link VNT Link
No. Metric Tie Tier Department
As Rucker and Extend Rucker Road Assist in bridging Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW
Prade east to S Carroll Ave. the floodplain to Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3,
properties Roadways are enable the C1, C2 Options 3.5,
develop, traffic anticipated to be completion of the 3.9
MT
volumes are constructed as Rucker extension 3
12
expected to development occurs project.
increase along with city participation
FM 1709. in bridging the
floodplain.
Pathways / Sidewalk Plan
The Official Pathways Map, adopted by City Council on January 7, 2014
designates that the north side of Zena Rucker Road is designated as having a
future sidewalk that is less than 8 feet wide and the south side of Zena Rucker
Road is designated as having a future multiuse trail that is greater than or
equal to 8 feet wide. The pedestrian access plan for Matthews Court shows a
continuation of the existing 8 foot wide hike & bike trail on the south side of
Zena Rucker Road, which was designed to connect with the future trail to the
east and the west.
Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan
The Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan was approved by City Council on September
20, 2011. The following recommendations are relevant to the medium density
cluster residential area designated on the Illustrative Recommendations Map
(below chart).
Ref. Issue Recommendation
No.
LU3 1. Land use designation Medium Density Residential Retain the Medium Density Residential designation for the area
south of Zena Rucker Road
2. Considerable amount of area dedicated to
floodplain and other water featuresEncourage “cluster” residential development
Preserve heavily wooded areas, especially within drainage areas
and floodplain
E2 1. Environmental stewardship and innovation in Encourage water reuse for irrigation
green building
Encourage green building design practices
2. Reserved open space/landscape areas require
heavy irrigation Preserve and enhance existing ponds
3. On‐site drainage detention facilities Reflect the desired preservation on the Carroll/1709 Small Area
Illustrative Map on the Environmental Resource Protection map
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-071 Page 2
Ref. Issue Recommendation
No.
M1 1. Desire to decrease dependence on the Development should be pedestrian oriented, emphasizing
automobile for everyday needs pedestrian connectivity in any residential areas.
Two schools, shopping and offices all within close Provide passive trails through preserved natural areas which also
2.
proximity of the site provide connectivity to the sidewalk system
M2 1. Round‐a‐bout approved at intersection of “Plaza Consider a roundabout at the intersection of Rucker and the
Drive” and Zena Rucker Road north‐south connector
M3 1. Create a vibrant and appealing streetscape along Provide curvilinear streets
the area’s local streets
Provide street trees between the sidewalk and the street curb
M4 1. A landscaped parkway concept with minimal Consider the creation of a new 60’ ROW 2‐ lane divided collector
pavement is desired for Zena Rucker Road (C2D) with medians and left‐turn/stacking lanes at intersections
in the Mobility Plan to apply to Zena Rucker Road
2. Landscaped medians preferred
“Urban” cross section which includes curb, gutters, medians,
3. No on‐street, parallel parking is desired street trees and sidewalks.
Speed limit not to exceed 30 m.p.h.
Design as a local slow movement roadway.
U2 1. Appropriately buffer and screen residential south Recommend a parkway buffer and street trees adjacent to
of Zena Rucker Road from any non‐residential Rucker Road.
uses to the north side of Zena Rucker Road
Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan Illustrative Recommendations Map.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-071 Page 3
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
Portions of Zena Rucker Road have been constructed from Byron Nelson
Parkway and from S. Carroll Avenue. The proposal for Matthews Court states
that in conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the
neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these
culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which
will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower
Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S.
Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway.
Traffic Impact
AM-PM-
Use Units Vtpd* AM-IN PM-IN
OUT OUT
Single-Family Detached
8 76 2 4 5 3
Housing (210)
* Vehicle Trips Per Day
* AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
th
* Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 Edition
UTILITIES:
Water
The applicant is proposing a connection to an existing eight inch (8”) water line
running north of the existing portion of Zena Rucker Road. The Preliminary
Water & Sanitary Sewer Layout for Matthews Court shows that the proposed
eight inch (8”) water line and valve will stub out with at nearly the same place
as the proposed extension of Zena Rucker Road. The applicant is proposing
an 8 inch (8”) water line and valve to run along the west side of proposed
Matthews Court road in order to service the subdivision.
Sewer
The applicant will be extending 8 inch (8”) sewer from a sewer manhole
located between Rockenbaugh Elementary and Lot 4, Block 1 Pecan Creek.
The applicant is proposing an 8 inch (8”) sanitary sewer main to run along the
west side of proposed Matthews Court road in order to service the subdivision.
TREE PRESERVATION:
There is approximately 39.8% tree canopy coverage, and the applicant is
proposing to preserve as much as 54.3% of that tree cover. There is
approximately 8.8% of that cover that is marginal and could potentially be
removed. The proposed Tree Conservation Plan is attached.
PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION:
August 6, 2015; Approved (6-0) subject to Review Summary No. 2, dated July
31, 2015 and also subject to staff report dated July 31, 2015.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated July 31, 2015.
N:\\Community Development\\MEMO\\2015 Cases\\071 - PP - Matthews Court\\Staff Report\\ZA15-071 - CC- 2015-09-01.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA15-071 Page 4
Case No. Attachment B
ZA15-071 Page 1
Plans and support information
Proposed Development Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-071 Page 1
Proposed Preliminary Plat
Case No. Attachment C
ZA15-071 Page 2
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-071 Page 1
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-071 Page 2
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-071 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-071 Page 4
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-071 Page 5
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-071 Page 6
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-071 Page 7
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-071 Page 8
Case No. Attachment D
ZA15-071 Page 9
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA15-071Two07/31/15
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Preliminary Plat –
Project Name: Matthews Court
APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, LLC Owner: Landlock, LLC
Tom Matthews Dale Clark
2600 E Southlake Blvd. 16390 Addison Rd.
Suite 120-323 Southlake, Texas Addison, Texas 75001
Phone: (214) 676-3434 Phone: (972) 931-8971
Fax: (817) 481-4074 Fax: (972) 931-8975
Email: tmatthews@fourpeaksdev.com Email: dc@wcdevelopment.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
07/29/15 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT JEROD
POTTS AT (817) 748-8195.
Planning Department Review Comments
Jerod Potts
Planner I
Phone: (817) 748-8195
Email: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us
1. All lots must comply with the underlying zoning district. As currently proposed this plat does not
comply with the underlying “Agricultural” zoning district and any approval of this plat is subject to
approval of an appropriate change in zoning. Please note existing and proposed zoning on the
preliminary plat.
2. Adjacent Lot 9 from the O W Knight Subdivision shows a Land Use Designation of Office
Commercial. Please correct by changing this to Retail Commercial.
3. The following changes are needed with regard to easements:
a. Provide easements for water, sewer, and drainage in compliance with construction
plans as approved.
4. Provide a the existing zoning in the quantitative land use schedule
Public Works Department Review Comments
Alejandra Ayala, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8247
Fax: (817) 748-8077
E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-071 Page 1
1.
This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-
construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
NEW REQUIREMENT: SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction
plans.
NEW REQUIREMENT:
3. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a
registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building
Inspections Department prior to construction.
5. Verify curve data of C2. Minimum radii for a C2U collector is 400-feet.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
* Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
* Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in
the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
EASEMENTS:
1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
2. Verify corner clips at the intersection of Zena Rucker Road and Matthews Court to allow for a 30’
minimum radius. Corner clips shall be shown on the plat. Refer to Ordinance No. 483.
* Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All
waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City
standards.
WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS:
1. Extend sanitary sewer to the eastern property line and provide sewer stub to adjacent property.
* Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way.
* The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed
before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc.
* Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
* Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
* Water and sanitary sewer lines in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-071 Page 2
1. Detailed hydrology and hydraulic analysis shall be required with Civil Construction Plan review to
determine if detention will be required. Models shall incorporate Teagues, Nall & Perkins effective
models (HMS and RAS). Any changes to the site plan may require a revision to the concept plan and
may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council.
2. Detailed hydrology and hydraulic analysis shall be required to determine limits of flood plain
reclamation using effective models from Teagues, Nall & Perkins (HMS and RAS). Determination of
finish floor elevations for lots adjacent to flood plain is contingent upon detailed study.
3. Finish floor elevations of lots adjacent to flood plain shall be 2-feet above the base flood elevations of
the channel.
4. Limits of the 100- year floodplain shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage easement.
5. Clearly label all private and public storm lines.
* Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets.
* Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards.
* Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #23 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning
construction ($309.83/Acre).
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and
meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the
Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The
plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes
which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways to be constructed with this
development. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade
stabilization.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082
to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the
City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the
City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Comments
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-071 Page 3
Fax: (817) 481-5713
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* Most of the existing trees on the site are pioneering tree species that have grown on the site in the
past 5 to 10 years. They consist of Hackberry, Cedar Elm, and American Elm which are multi-trunked
or in clusters that sprouted after being brush hogged and then left to grow.
The most prominent quality trees are along the west property boundary of the property where they are
proposed to be preserved. The Developer has also chosen the most prominent quality trees in the
interior of the property to preserve.
* The proposed zoning for the development is Residential Planned Unit Development, R-PUD. The
submitted Tree Conservation Plan falls 5.7% short of complying with the Existing Tree Cover
Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance for a standard zoning district. RPUD
zoning districts are subject to City Council approval. To mitigate the removal the applicant is proposing
to provide eighty (80”) caliper inches of landscape trees in the open space, and a minimum of twenty-
four (24”) caliper inches of shade trees and two (2) understory trees will be planted on each lot when a
house is built. A minimum total of two-hundred-seventy-two (272”) of new trees will be planted
throughout the development.
There is 39.8% of existing tree cover on the site and 60% of that existing tree cover is required to be
preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 54.3% of the existing tree cover.
For property sought to be zoned for, Planned Unit Development zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding
development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall
review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The
City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides
for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to
maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental
Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas
from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage
creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets
as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-071 Page 4
Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved
by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities,
structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing
trees intended to be preserved.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Fire Department Review Comments
Kelly Clements
Assistant Fire Marshal
Phone: 817-748-8233
Fax: 817-748-8181
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
No comments based on submitted plans.
Community Services Department Review Comments
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
Phone: 817-748-8607
Fax: 817-748-8027
E-mail: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee
credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park
land for every forty (40) dwelling units.
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the
amount of $3000 per dwelling unit x 8 dwelling units= $24,000.00 .
Pathway Comments:
Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian
access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide
4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and
Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements.
Other informational comments?
The following should be informational comments only
============= ====================
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-071 Page 5
* Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial, they appear to meet the intent
of this requirement.
* Staff recommends any proposed landscape / bufferyard areas are included in areas designated as
common area.
* Label the R.O.W. width next to the street name for Zena Rucker Road.
* This development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of offsite R.O.W. and construction of
a portion of Zena Rucker Road.
* A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's
Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees,
off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and impact fees.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Although the Subdivision Ordinance requires that utility easements be provided along the perimeter of
the property staff recommends that utility easements be provided only where needed to ensure
adequate extension of franchise and public utilities.
* This Preliminary Plat includes existing structures, such as stables, which are identified on the
Development Plan as “TO BE REMOVED.” Please ensure that there is consistency between
documents in terms of which structures are to be removed. Possible confirm by providing a separate
survey or dimensioned exhibit showing the location of any existing structures or note that all such
structures are to be removed. Confirm that any existing structures to remain are adequately off-set per
zoning district setback regulations from the proposed lot lines.
* When a Final Plat is filed it will be required to tie down the Pedestrian Access Easement by metes
and bounds.
* Please be aware that sidewalk design standards need to meet those in Subdivision Ordinance No.
483 Section 5.06.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA15-071 Page 6
Surrounding Property Owners
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
Zelda Partners Ltd AG 811 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 6.70000000
1.
Hcp Crs2 Ltach-Baylor Southlak SP1 731 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 4.52200000
2.
Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr AG 841 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 4.23500000
3.
Timarron Owners Assn Inc RPUD 700 GREYMOOR PL 5.78300000
4.
Carroll ISD RPUD 301 BYRON NELSON PKWY 15.83000000
5.
Devane Clarke Partnership Ltd SP2 731 ZENA RUCKER RD 2.30000000
6.
Landlock Llc AG 851 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 4.19700000
7.
Weatherford Loan Company SP1 835 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 4.21500000
8.
Rucker, Zena Sullivan Tr AG 650 S CARROLL AVE 50.44504446
9. F
Hayes, Billy W Etux Carolyn AG 807 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.90700000
10.
Rucker, Zena Sullivan AG 803 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.81969724
11. F
Noorneel Llc SP1 751 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.88300000
12.
Superintendent of Carroll ISD
13.
Superintendent of Grapevine
14.
Colleyville ISD
Superintendent of Northwest ISD
15.
Superintendent of Keller ISD
16.
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Responses Received: In Favor: (2) Opposed To: (0) Undecided: (0) No Response: (14)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA15-071 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Case No. Attachment G
ZA15-071 Page 1
Case No. Attachment G
ZA15-071 Page 2