Loading...
0447 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE , TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 447 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS , ADOPTING A MASTER PLAN/LAND USE PLAN: ADOPTING A POLICY MANUAL ; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE : PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE , TEXAS , THAT : Section 1 . That Ordinance No . 447 is hereby adopted pursuant to Chapter XI , Section 11 . 06 of the City of Southlake Home Rule Charter . Section 2 . That pursuant to the City Charter , the Master Plan/ Land Use Plan shall be updated on an annual basis and shall contain the planning consideration for a period of ten (10) years . Section 3 . That the Master Plan/Land Use Plan policy manual dated July, 1988 shall be attached as exhibit "A" to the ordinance . Section 4 . That the Master Plan/ Land Use Plan, a copy of which is on file in the office of City Secretary of the City of Southlake , Texas , is hereby adopted an designated as the Master Plan/Land Use Plan the same as though it were attached to this ordinance . Section 5 . If any section, article , paragraph, sentence , clause , phrase , or word in this ordinance or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconditional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance , and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect . Section 6 . This ordinance shall become effective after its adoption by the City Council . PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE AID0f /4,,/, /i , _ 1988 . gaillfra &„,:v ,Cd3• J ri Tr ter olm <,.%* M4yo of Southlake ATT ST: // aC 'y°, C / . ura L . LeGrana ' City Secretary �J,`4/0?// 11 1111a�``,,,i� I CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES 1 I I I / I I I I D i • kV I 0 I I I LAND USE PLA N I REPORT I I 1 TEXT EXHIBIT TO ORDINANCE NO. 447 ISEPTEMBER. 1988 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES September, 1988 Mayor and City Council City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Subject: Transmittal of Land Use Plan Map & Report It is a pleasure to transmit to the City of Southlake the completed land use plan map and report. We would like to take the opportunity to offer a few comments. A large number of individual citizens, neighborhood groups, city staff, appointed and elected local officials participated in the development of this plan. The plan truly is theirs. They all devoted considerable time and resources to the development of the plan. It is they who should receive any thanks and any other show of appreciation. The city charter requires the plan be reviewed and updated annually. Thus this transmittal of maps and documents marks not the end of a process, but the beginning of a on-going municipal planning process with excellence of quality of like as its principal goal. It was gratifying and certainly often interesting to have furnished the technical support for this effort. We look forward to working with Southlake in the future on this and other planning projects. TuAA.„.. Eddie Cheatham, P.E. Mike Monroe, AICP 6 Principal Urban Planning Manager ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 2011 East Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/460-2111 • Metro 265-7948 a r r . table of contents !FPURPOSE 1 GOALS 3 ACTIVITY CENTER 8 LAND USE MAP DISCUSSION 9 GENERAL POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 17 CLOSING 22 6 fi ikr r r r I P 1 LAND USE PLAN REPORT ft is r a PURPOSE oft This policy manual is a brief companion piece to the land use irr plan map itself. While both may be used independently, neither ftft should be considered without the other. ftv The Land Use Plan is but one element of Southlake' s growing comprehensive planning effort. That comprehensive effort is a combination of all the individual existing and future municipal fft, physical planning activities ; including land use, thoroughfares, water, sewer, storm drainage, parks , etc. xft S The basic purpose of this land use element is to provide a sound, r reasonable and clear basis for making decisions about land use development and related matters . A political objective of the planning process is for the resulting policies and other decisions to have the broadest citizen support as can be achieved i�. given the limitations of the planning effort. irr i` 16.r t 2 it w, Emphasis should be given to the fact that the land use plan, the f1r map and this text, is a guide. It is not a "design" that has it been legislatively fixed. It is meant to be refined and modified as time passes, as more and better information becomes ir available. It is certainly not intended to be a rejection of better ideas. It should be noted that planning within this context is (or should be) a continuous process, being constantly refined and as amended. The planning process must be a reflection of the matter being planned. A city like Southlake is and will be S anything but static. City planning is not a one-time activity ma that results in a design that is forever fixed. S Another purpose of this document is recording "legislative r intent" . It documents the thinking behind some of the written and graphic land use policies. It is also to be informative to is those citizens and other persons who may have an interest in this S process. Additionally, it is to be an outline and written o"' description of suggested policies and program recommendations it for land development management. S er r.. Yr 3 Or GOALS lirr it City planning serves several simultaneous general goals: health, conservation of resources, efficiency, aesthetics, democratic participation, rational management, etc. A more specific aim in land use planning is the preservation and r enhancement of quality of life for existing and future residential areas. This aim, while it must be balanced with economic and other realities, is preeminent. 04, There are many varied interests in Southlake, often with competing and conflicting individual goals. An underlying objective of the planning process is to balance, as best is practically possible, those conflicting objectives; develop compromises and new solutions where possible. it However, one objective is nearly universally held. That is that isP there should be a preservation of the aesthetic, environmental and other related attributes of Southlake' s "rural" environment to the maximum extent possible -- for as long as possible. The current heated discussions over what minimum lot sizes should be allowed in Southlake may be somewhat misplaced. Maybe it is not the one acre lots on roughly 20% of the developed area that gives the feeling of openness. Maybe it is the 80% to 85% of the total r ea 4 land area of Southlake that is in farms and acreages that gives the feeling of openness . Perhaps that is what should be preserved as much as possible as long as possible. NW It is recognized that the combination of demands for municipal services and other growing municipal financial burdens plus ` development pressures will likely bring more development. Likely ft this development will be of a higher density - out of economic necessities and other realities. It is encouraging that a large segment of the developers currently working in Southlake recognizes that the "quality and style of life" in Southlake has considerable economic value to themselves. It appears they wish to balance the need to preserve those values with their need to realize some gain from their investments. This attitude should be transplanted into other developers that may be coming into the area. r The amount of area remaining in acreages and larger holdings plus a time can also work to preserve the rural character of the area. If Southlake develops at a rate of 200 acres per year -- there is Irr a 50 - 60 year supply of "raw" land in Southlake. Another fairly universally held goal is that the various interests in Southlake wish to avoid becoming another "bad" example of unplanned suburban sprawl . The apparent choice 6„ between goals or assumptions here is: 1r S * • 5 (a) Sacrificing some land development "license" in a trade for excellence. It an unfortunate fact that man, if left r completely to his own individual devices, will eventually ,, damage his own habitat. irr Gallion and Eisner point out in The Urban Pattern, S "Today we see these cities scarred by congestion and decay, speculation and ugliness. We see the science and invention of our remarkable age snarled in the fol tangle of the urban network. At best our cities are ft mediocre. That mediocrity is a travesty of the productive genius and creative energy of America. j� It is not the desire of the people that their cities should be so built. Rather it is their ambition to create fine cities; otherwise the forward strides that have been taken would not even have been attempted. It is the essence of democracy that the people shall be masters of their destiny, that their behavior shall be guided by the precepts of law and order. Yet our f cities suffer disorder and confusion as though born of anarchy. " of- or; (b) Decide that total and complete individual freedom or laissez-faire is more important than excellence. This would involve a conscious (or de facto) decision for developmental Darwinism -- weak or no planning, no policies nor regulations; letting the economically and politically strongest few determine the developmental future of a Southlake. r i�. a 6 lir Texas is a stronghold of political freedom adherents. Some would et- claim relinquishing of any individual license is to be avoided at all costs. But as citizens congregate more and more, enlightened fr ilr self-interest should make for necessary, but voluntary relinquishing of total license. If rules for the common good are adopted voluntarily by a majority, such rule making is not undemocratic. a Herbert Smith in The Citizen' s Guide to Planning offers the following, "Unfortunately, we have been told that the only way the tax base can be improved or even maintained is if we do nothing to discourage all forms of growth, adopt no regulation or rrr restrictions that will hamper "free enterprise" in any way, and, certainly, never demand that development be anything more than mediocre. To do otherwise, we are told, simply will drive away economic opportunities and preclude the creation of jobs for our people. But will it really? In thinking about desirable, attractive cities or neighborhoods you have seen -- the places that made you think, "How nice it would be to live there" -- what did you find attractive about them? Was it that their people had no sense of purpose and direction and left things to chance, being satisfied with whatever happened, or was it because someone cared, someone bothered to plan, and those involved recognized that quality and excellence are important and can be achieved? If the truth were known, it would be that the residents of desirable neighborhoods have discovered that quality breeds excellence and that, the higher you set your standards, the more you are sought out by those looking to it make sound economic investments. One city in the Southwest, with which I was once associated, may have learned this the hard way. Its officials made a zoning change in violation of an adopted future land use plan so that a major industry could locate in an expanding residential area. The space should have been used for a school and open space to add stability to the residences; but the company wanted "freeway exposure, " refused to consider other sites in an excellent industrial park already zoned, and threatened to go to another community if they didn't get their way. The change was made, and the plant is now surrounded by a KOA campground and some rather ill-conceived mobile-home parks. kw a ? The better cities and the better neighborhoods (and this does not simply mean more wealthy) know that Dr. John it R. lSilber, president of Boston University, was right when he ansaid article on excellence in Harper' s magazine: 'The only standard of performance that can sustain a free society is excellence. It is increasingly claimed, however, that excellence is at odds with democracy; increasingly we are urged to offer a dangerous embrace to mere adequacy Our flight from excellence is profoundly philosophicalOut of a well-intentioned but inept concern with equality of iso opportunity, we have begun to reject anything that exceeds anyone' s grasp. Some might argue that it is our right to engage in this curious flight, and so it is, the right of free men to be fools. But do we have the right as citizens in a free society to reject excellence on behalf of others who may not be so foolish? ' Thus, if we are really honest with ourselves, we know that sto in the area of land and resource utilization, people, if lir left to their individual devices, will be seduced by the siren of exploitation in our erstwhile "free enterprise" system. Collective society' s use of the planning process is the only way that this can be overcome, excellence achieved, the errors of the past corrected, current mistakes avoided, and future misjudgements held to a minimum. " a If it is decided that a reasonable level of land development a regulation is necessary for excellence, the city also needs to provide the resources with which to implement the rules. Otherwise, they are useless and become a mockery. r go r 1•r 0., . 8 ACTIVITY CENTER The subject of a central business district, a "main" street or a Wrr "downtown" in Southlake has been discussed during other planning activities as well as this one. Southlake has not created a central focus point nor does it have the vestige of an older Pfr downtown as do some developing suburbs. In the past it has been hi made clear that the general feeling is that there should not be r an effort made to create a "downtown" . r la However, there has emerged a general concensus that there should be encouraged a central focus to at least governmental a activities. It has been recommended that the general area around Carroll Ave. and SH 114 be encouraged to be the activity center is and locale for new and/or expanded municipal and other yo governmental functions. It is hoped that these activities would be a magnet and attract compatible uses and activities. I The purpose of encouraging or establishing this type of activity r center would be to give some focus to Southlake as a "real" town (Ir versus being just another amorphous bedroom community. iipr a r r i1r s. 9 THE LAND USE MAP a A few remarks should be made about the map itself, its background r and intent. The map represents, to the best of combined abilities, a balance or combination of what we would like to see as a land use a development pattern, what we have that probably cannot be changed p. ar over the next twenty years, and probably what will happen during to the next twenty years irrespective of what we want. The map looks forward only twenty years. But the City Charter requires an annual updating of the plan. Given an "optimistic" development rate of 200 acres/year, it has been noted that in twenty years, Southlake would be only half developed. But at this time, no one knows which half . Full development is assumed for the purposes of development the land sr use pattern. p. The plan depicts a recommended pattern of land uses - showing permitted (and prohibited) uses by location and amount. Many land use plans are based on developing areas in which certain activities are permitted or encouraged. It is desired that the Southlake plan express also that unless so desiginated in the following definitions, all other uses are prohibited. r 4= �Ib Iwo OP 10 The following land use definitions are in use for the purposes of this year' s plan: Public/Semi-Public Ow Land which is orro osed to be occupied p by such uses a parks, schools, cemeteries, libraries and other public buildings. Flood Plain a Areas designated on Federal Emergency Management Agency maps as ft being in the 100 year flood plain. Although building in the flood plain is permissible under certain conditions, it should be discouraged. Building in the flood way is not permissible. im These areas should be reserved for open space and other uses PW compatible with their natural use of conveying and temporarily it holding storm runoff. Industrial It is the intention of Southlake to encourage industrial development that is relatively free of unwanted side effects such as unsightliness, noise, odor, glare, vibrations, etc. Areas appropriate for uses with noxious side effects do not exist in 34. so 11 err Southlake nor are areas likely to be set aside for such "heavy" industry. f No residential development should be allowed in industrial areas. Compatible commercial uses may be allowed in areas shown in the Industrial category to- es Low Density Residential Residential areas where lots are or will be one acre or larger, as a requirement. Limited office and/or retail may be permitted IN providing the area is sufficiently buffered from adjacent residential property and that the nature of the commerce is primarily to support local residents with neighborhood services. Public and semi-public uses consistent with the activities of the off neighborhood may be permitted. Hopefully such non-residential a uses will be contained in planned development areas and not in isolated spots or strips . No heavy or regional commercial or iis industrial activities should be permitted. ow f Medium Density Residential Residential areas where lots of one acre or smaller can be iirr permitted. The same philosophy regarding non-residential uses if to 12 to expressed in the low density residential areas definition apply if to this land use definition. to ***Note: Potential non-residential development within 1000 ' of i existing or future residential areas -- especially low density irr areas -- will be "red-flagged" by the P&Z and Council. This is oft- iir particularly applicable within the 65 Ldn noise contour. This if wide band of transitional area is graphically depicted on the map Yr in several locations. The purpose is that the Council wishes to be sure that a maximum effort will be made to minimize the impact of the non-residential development on the residential areas. 1�r Mixed _Development to Yr Southlake has numerous areas that contain large tracts of r undeveloped land near major transportation corridors for which a prediction of use is difficult. It is generally felt that bp these areas (near SH 114 , FM 1709 & FM 1938) are appropriate for office, retail and associated type uses ( excluding industrial bo except in the far south east corner of the city near the railroad tracks) serving regional uses . It is desired that residential to uses not be absolutely excluded from these areas. The nature of commercial development makes future land use map distinctions between commercial activities in these areas futile. Yr Wr r* fil 13 The key to the mixed use areas being successful from an occupant' s and neighbor' s point of view will be how well the accommodation of the mixed uses is addressed in site planning. Thus, these areas may contain a mix heavy office and retail, IIIc neighborhood office and retail and residential uses. Non-residential uses must be suitably buffered from residential uses. Planned, mixed-use developments of larger tracts is �1r encouraged. Non-residential uses will be subject to site plan review to determine if the plan is effective in making the development compatible with adjacent existing or potential residential areas. New residential areas will be encouraged to is include buffering against existing non-residential uses. No industrial uses should be permitted in these areas. I Public and Semi-Public uses may be established in these areas assuming general compatibility. No residential uses can be permitted for development_ within the 65 Ldn noise contour in accordance with an agreement with the DFW International Airport. This applies to new developments or subdivisions. Vacant lots within existing subdivisions may be built upon providing all the avigation easement and release requirements are met. r Developers of non-residential uses within the 65 ldn noise r frr 14 ow contour (or other locations for that matter) should be well P" informed that the site plan review of proposed developments will scrutinize how well adjacent residential areas are buffered. r lir Because of the circumstances regarding the residential areas P within the noise contour, the City' s review of development proposals will be especially sensitive to how well the interests of existing residents are accommodated. ow The current map and this document represents a deliberate move away from a detailed land use map. The futility of such in Southlake' s case is well recognized. It is the intent that details that might ordinarily appear on a land use map be e replaced with written policy guidelines. Reiterating, there are of- many large tracts of undeveloped land. About 80% of the city is not currently developed. The location and timing of major ift influencing transportation facility construction is in flux. No major land use matters or trends for non-residential uses along oo SH 114, FM 1709 and FM 1938 have been established or even started. Thus, a "broad-brush" approach for the map has been used intentionally. The land use categories are intentionally broad, being only general in what they include and exclude. The boundaries of such categories are also intentionally vague. The design of the land development regulatory or management process and its associated documentation is that high quality innovative development be encouraged. ir err 15 Current policy thinking within the City that establishing "minimum standards" will result in only minimums. The policy direction is towards the city development review process r reviewing individual development proposals against desired P performance standards, versus regulating with minimums. The "framework" for the land use plan map is the approved iir Southlake Thoroughfare Plan. The following comments are from the Plan (they appear on the face of the map) ; and are included for off, information purposes: r SOUTHLAKE THOROUGHFARE PLAN DEFINITION: THIS MAP IS A POLICY STATEMENT BY THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. THE STATEMENT IS A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF APPROXIMATELY WHERE FUTURE THOROUGHFARES SHOULD BE LOCATED AND APPROXIMATELY HOW MUCH RIGHT-OF-WAY EVENTUALLY MIGHT BE REQUIRED FOR THOSE THOROUGHFARES. MOST ROUTES WILL BE ALONG EXISTING COUNTY ROADS. SOME WILL BE ALONG EXISTING CITY STREETS. A FEW OF THE ROUTES SHOWN WILL BE NEW ROUTES. THESE NEW ROUTES AND THE COLLECTOR GRID, WILL GENERALLY BE BUILT AS THE SURROUNDING AREA IS DEVELOPED. FM 1709 AND FM 1938 CAN BE ANTICIPATED EVENTUALLY TO BE SIX LANE DIVIDED MAJOR ARTERIALS. ROUTES SHOWN ON THIS MAP AT THE 84 ' ROW WIDTH SHOULD BE flr ANTICIPATED TO BE FOUR LANE DIVIDED OR UNDIVIDED THOROUGHFARES . Ib ROUTES SHOWN AT THE 64 ' WIDTH WILL NORMALLY BE TWO LANE THOROUGHFARES, ALTHOUGH A FOUR LANE FACILITY MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IF TRAFFIC DEMANDS WARRANT THE EXPANSION. ROUTES SHOWN AT THE 50 ' WIDTH ARE PLANNED FOR TWO MOVING LANES ONLY. i1r I L rr up 16 POLICY NOTES : r 1] Street Stub-outs will be generally required into adjacent property if property line( s) exceeds 1000 feet in length. two 3] State Highway 114 is expected to be a future freeway with R.O.W. requirements approaching 425 feet in width and greater at selected overpasses. Existing R.O.W. is approximately 220 feet. 4] It is a policy of the City of Southlake that new development incorporate north-south & east-west collectors on approximately 1/4 mile increments. A detailed collector plan, augmenting this thoroughfare plan, should be developed for each i(rrr local area when a parcel is being developed and/or platted. a err Ib a 1111 NO it bar amp 17 GENERAL POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS a Policies should be adopted which are aimed at preserving the open, peaceful and uncrowded nature of the City to the extent possible -- for as long as possible. Maintain the interior, off-corridor large estate and agricultural tracts by encouraging development at other locations for as long as possible. It may a be desirable to allow or encourage pockets of residential and other types of development in parts of the city close to major transportation and utility networks first, maintaining the large tracts located away from such networks. a Policies should be adopted to assist in avoiding the deleterious ,. side affects of rapid suburbanization that can be seen in the IN region: traffic jams, drainage problems, utility system overloading, awkward and inconvenient development, unattractive neighborhoods, general local government financial problems, etc. That is, commit to develop plans, implementation policies and programs -- then follow them. Citizens need to be sufficiently informed on development issues so that they will support their elected and appointed officials and will assist in avoiding buckling under "quick-buck type" ft developers or in sacrificing the quality of life in a whole IYr sector of the city for a few tax dollars. 18 Certainly economic development is desirable, but not at any cost. rr "Luck is the residue of design. " Blind luck is not going to create an excellent community. Only a commitment, not lip Iwo service, to comprehensive planning will begin to bring about excellence. If Southlake wishes to be better that other cities ar in the region -- it must plan better. It must have a real political and financial commitment to that planning and it must follow up with policies and programs to implement those plans. Such is not politically or economically cheap. Adopt a policy of not allowing approval of zoning district changes which will create land use incompatibility. Some hierarchically adjacent uses may be established providing proper Sr buffering is used. 110 Encourage development of large-tract, high-quality commercial and industrial developments . This can be done by insuring the proper level of infrastructure is available and that "permitting" of err desired development is sure and expeditious. Having the proper land use decisions in place aids in the permitting and having public acceptance of such development "pre-gained" to the extent p* possible. Encourage the large-tract, mixed-use development that has been "master planned. " Aim for a balanced ad valorem tax base and retaining Southlake' s sales tax dollars. wr 19 �r. Where a group of small tracts exist -- encourage the blocking-up iro of these tracts for large tract development. If it cannot be disallowed altogether -- discourage strip development, individually and collectively, to the maximum extent possible. Consider adopting a "corridor ordinance" for SH 114 and FM 1709 --- such as has Austin, Garland, Rowlett, etc. for major corridors. Such controls establish setbacks , landscaping requirements, curb cut controls, sign control, etc. It should go without saying that there should be a scheme relative to properties' access to streets and thoroughfare. Ideally, property ( residential or otherwise) in a developed area should have access only to local streets (private or public) or collectors. As a general rule, properties should not have direct orp access to thoroughfares or highways. Such direct access creates unsightly strip development and subsequent frequent curb cuts create traffic hazards and congestion. Generated traffic is gathered by "collectors" and conveyed to thoroughfares. Collectors , because of their lower vehicle speeds and volumes, can tolerate some direct access. The purpose of imp thoroughfares is to carrying traffic , not provide access to adjacent property. err 0 +r. Yr 20 Certainly, such access cannot be always avoided, as in the case of existing small tracts with no other means of ingress or egress. However, an important aim of the subdivsion platting review process should be to encourage access to developing P property via collectors and streets and to limit the number of entrances to and from thoroughfares. r. Encourage orderly, sequential development that will aid in the r,,,, development of perimeter streets, collectors, and utilities. Off-site policies, street escrow funds and other permissible r" tools are available to encourage orderly development and discourage leap-frog development. Consider further zoning and subdivision amendments that will move the City towards measuring development proposals against desired °11 performance standards and discontinuing "minimums. " r i1r Establish a written policy (development administration plan or rr S.O.P. ' s on how development applications or proposals will be handled -- from preliminary meetings , to zoning, through f platting, developer' s agreement etc. Such a policy should be in handbook form which could be bound together with applicable as regulations into a developer' s manual. Fft Establish a policy that when a zoning application which appears to run counter to the land use plan or is deserving of public s 21 6 input due to its impact -- such application will be considered as a simultaneous land use map amendment and zoning change. The consideration of such a change should be well publicized. „, Adequate public input and expert testimony should be major inputs to the decision. This helps keep the zoning consistent with the land use plan as required -- and keeps public support for the planning and regulatory effort. (If an application doesn't have adequate, common sense support and is vigorously opposed -- r should the zoning amendment be granted?) b” Begin review and consideration of development design performance criteria, appearance codes, corridor ordinances and other measures to encourage environmentally and aesthetically acceptable development. Begin thinking about associated planning activities -- park master plan ( including parkland acquisition policy) , drainage master plan, completion of water and sewer plans, etc. tit rr r r V i.. 22 L E CLOSING i•• Even after all of this has been said, good planning and a r,,, commitment to support the planning cannot alone make things happen. Municipal land development management controls are only a part of the overall land development mechanism. High property values are very influential in assuring high quality development iwr -- and they may tend to slow the pace of development. There is kWa direct relationship between high quality planning, high property values and high quality projects in addition to location and other market influences . The municipal development management system can be a positive influence -- but it will Wr still take the market to make it happen. The city should take the balanced stance of regulator and development facilitator. us The city is a very important player in the economic development er process not only as its principle regulator, but also as supporter. 1�w It has been the intent of this brief report to represent a concensus, balanced view of community goals regarding OD development. From there, hopefully it accurately represents the opinions of where we should go from where we are and by what am methods. IN err hoe lip t = '7 'LY dS�C77HS iHdSb' °J/Y/S' , O/- Z ^- •Ad 2IM2 NdSb' W" l0// , PZ bi • 1 0 0 00 00 00 0 '7 1 ✓Y1 a Z 00000 0 (,Z161) SIN30100V H101M {lNt/ 'M'0'8 3d11 0Nt7 N101M 'alts £ 83AO S3GV89 oFoz 83AO S3A8no 033dS AIOSIAOV ]O KNV8 1Id8 30Nt! SIO 1H91S 'S38 1N3WdO13A1 O Fort Worth Star-Tel 400 W.SEVENTH STREET•FORT WORTH,TEX DATE I DES FEB 11 6279334 februa THE STATE OF TEXAS County of Tarrant CIT57 Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, this day personally appeared Dana Pitts Secretary for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, published by the Capital Cities Communications, Inc. at Fort Worth, in Tarrant County, Texas; and who, after being duly sworn, did depose and say that the following clipping of an advertisement was published in the above named paper on the following dates: 6279334 February 11, 1989 PUBNLIICIOHEAORING Notice Is hereby given to all in- terested persons that the City Council of the City of Southiake, CL• 008 Texas will be holding a Public Hearing duringtheregular City ********* Council Meetingg9�to beheld on February 21,1989,at 7:30 P.M. * In the City Council Chambers of City Hall,667 North Carroll Av- * ,,enue, Southiake, Texas. Pur- R E C O N C Pose of the hearing Is to consid- er the second reading of * MO Ordinance 447. /� AN ORDINANCE PROVID- * CALL 39 Signed V lJ/ !6INGFORTHELOCATIONOF * (SPECIFIC TRAFFIC CON- TROL DEVICES ON PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ********* Subscribed and sworn to before me, this the 20 ILYINGWITHINTHECORPO 1989 RATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS t a=!Y"Public� -�{ -��IIDENTIFYINGSTHE ANEED N h:4 ,,,, I FOR THE INSTALLATIONOF 4 Y r Etr �y�1 W. FL ETCHER THESE TRAFFIC CONTROL exas @c�'' =',' P•10 3fy Pubji TTHEIRESINSTALLATION ING OIN STATE OF•� \S ACCORDANCEWITHPROVI- t 4 } Yt SIONS OF THE STATE DE- PARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS [' ;aa 1U 902 AND PUBLICTRANSPORTA- -y y� 'ti q tiY (��• My(`,Ofpl(1?.Ex�s. P• V- TION UNIFORM MANUAL Y IgP9 ON TRAFFIC CONTROL DE- e" i" � VICES CONTAININGACCU- ERAB,IILITYLCLAUSEE A OrTws O # PENALTY PROVISION, S s >..a i.� PROVIDING FOR PUBLICA- �+ .., TION-AND PROVIDING AN Sd,� l�,,iA ( EFFECTIVE DATE. el City of Southiake l CURRENT ST•Sandra LeGrand l City Secretary OUNT NUMBER t IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING YOUR ACCOUNT,PLEASE CONTACT OUR CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT AT(817)390-7761.TO ASSIST ON RECPT :TE AND TIMELY POSTING OF YOUR PAYMENTS,PLEASE MAIL ALL PAYMENTS Tr:,r'.(`. 130:: 99074 ,:'.)F'T WORTH,TEX4'_:'6.S,9. a —TEAR ALONG THIS PERFORATION AND RETURN THE LOWER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT fit, ADVERTISING STATEMENT rort Worth REMIT TO , P O BOX 99074 • FORT WORTH, TEXAS 7619 ACCOUNT PAYMENT NUMBER DUE DATE 6279334 PAGE OF CIT57 ON RECPT I PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT , CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ORIGINA 667 N CARROLL 25 . 20 SOUTHLAKE TX 76092 0 A T T N : SANDY L E G R A N D PLEASE WRITE IN AMOUNT ENCLOSED Fort Worth Star-TE_ - 400 W.SEVENTH STREET•FORT WORTH TE DATE DE II 3/14 6279334 2/ THE STATE OF TEXAS CIT57 County of Tarrant Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, this day personally appeared Rosalie Rivera Secretary for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, published by the Capital Cities Communications, Inc. at Fort Worth, in Tarrant County, Texas; and who, after being duly sworn, did depose and say that the following clipping of an advertisement was published in the above named paper on the following dates: 6279334 2/11/89 pUBOTICEOF ARING Notice Is hereby given to all in- terested persons that the City 00$ Council of theCityof Southlake, Texas will be holding a Public Hearing during the regular City Council Meetingto be held on February 21,1989 at 7:30 P.M. In the City Council Chambers of City Hall,667 North Carroll Av- enue, Southlake, Texas. Pur- pose of the hearing Is to consid- er the second reading of Ordinance 447. ------ Signed '� AN ORDINANCE PROVID- ING FOR THE LOCATION OF SPECIFIC TRAFFIC CON- TROL DEVICES ON PUBLIC 1989. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this . e ISTREET RIGHT-OF-WAY � LYINGWITHINTHECORPO RATE LIMITS OF THE CITY Notary Public �" �UPONUINVESTIGATIOSI� �L1LLf�_ IDENTIFYING THE NEED Texas FOR THE INSTALLATIONOF "y THESE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES;PROVIDING FOR THEIR INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITHPROVI- SIONS OF THE STATE DE- 1 i w PAR TME NT OF HIGHWAYS TIONPUNIFORMNSORTMANUAL � � ON TRAFFIC CONTROL DE- 1 VICES;CONTAINING ACCU- orTg MULATIVE CLAUSE;A SEV- ERABILITY CLAUSE A PROVIDING FOR PENALTY PUIBLCA- r, T L TION;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. MICEMIZ.1-- CU"Send e LuLeG�and IOD 1 ACCOUNT NUMBER ///�������C!!! City Secretary ON RECPT. 2 1 :• IF YOU HAVE QUEST IONS REGARDING YOUR ACCOUNT,PLEASE CONTACT OUR CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT AT(817)390-7761.TO ASSIST US IN AN ACCURATE AND TIMELY POSTING OF YOUR PAYMENTS, PLEASE MAIL ALL PAYMENTS TO P.O. BOX 99074 FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76199. A -- TEAR ALONG THIS PERFORATION AND RETURN THE LOWER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT - ADVERTISING STATEMENT F'ort Worth REMIT TO P O BOX 99074• FORT WORTH TEXAS 7619 ACCOUNTI. PAYMENT NUMBER CIT57 DUE DATE ON RECPT 6279334 PAGE OF CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 N CARROLL SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT , $25.20 PLEASE WRITE IN AMOUNT ENCLOSED Fort Worth Star-Tel- 400 W.SEVENTH STREET•FORT WORTH TEX. DATE DES E SEP 23 6210936 septer THE STATE OF TEXAS t County of Tarrant CITY 5� IETARy i Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, this day personally appeared Sue Russell Secretary for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, published by the Capital Cities Communications, Inc. at Fort Worth, in Tarrant County, Texas; and who, after being duly sworn, did depose and say that the following clipping of an advertisement was published in the above named paper on the following dates: ******** 6210936 Sept . 23 , 1988 PASTE AD HERE * * CITY OF RECON CL. 008 151: ORONANCEE,TEXA * M 447 AN ORDINANCE OFOTHEHCITY * CALL 3 ADOPTINGAAEMASTER * PLAN/LAND USE PLAN: ADOPTING A POLICY MAN- UAL;PROVIDING ASEVER- ******** ABILITY CLAUSE:PROVID- ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Signed City of Southlake Sandra L.LeGrand CIty Secretary Subscribed and sworn to before me, this the 28 day of September Notary Publi Tarrant County, Texas. + V Pot, EVELYN W. FLETCHER Notary Public * * STATE OF TEXAS ?�? tti� My Comm.Exp.Sep.30,1992 CURRENT CURRENT STATEMENT PERIOD ACCOUNT NUMBER ON RECPT 9/23 - 9/23 CIT57 IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING YOUR ACCOUNT,PLEASE CONTACT OUR CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT AT(817)390-7761.TO ASSIST US IN AN ACCURATE AND TIMELY POSTING OF YOUR PAYMENTS,PLEASE MAIL ALL PAYMENTS TO P.O.BOX 99074 FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76199. A�TEAR ALONG THIS PERFORATION AND RETURN THE LOWER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT �L ADVERTISING STATEMENT FortWorth REMIT TO P.O. BOX 99074 • FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76199 ACCOUNT PAYMENT 6210936 NUMBER CIT57 DUE DATE ON RECPT PAGE 10E CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ORIGINAL 667 N CARROLL PLEASE PAY 5 . 25 SOUTHLAKE TX 76092 0 THIS AMOUNT ATTN : SANDRA LEGRAND PLEASE WRITE IN AMOUNT ENCLOSED win Fort Worth Star-T�-' �~� • 400 W.SEVENTH STREET,*FORT WORTH, -„ ' DATE f YrP 09 6202462 sep 7, 7 P 151988 THE STATE OF TEXAS i CE OF County of Tarrant OF CITY SECRETARY, Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, this day personall Cindy Truitt Y a ppeared Secretary for the Fort Worth Star—Telegram, published by the Capital Cities Communications, Inc. at Fort Worth, in Tarrant County, Texas; and who, after being duly sworn, did depose and say that the following clipping of an advertisement was published in the above named paper on the following dates: ***** September 9 , NOTICE FPUBLIC 1988 pp * NOTICE Is hereby given to all 1 InteresM* RE AM & councilppftlpersQplitlitheClty P rT Texas IJvillhbe 11'YIOFn3Ja hpublic * hearing at the regular City Council Meeting to be held on * CAL September 20,1988 at 7:30 o.m. In the city council chambers of * cityhall,667 North Carroll Ave- nue Southlake,Texas. ***** PURPOSE of the hearing Is to consider the second reading on the following ordinance. Signed �� SOUTH�AKE TEXAS AN ORDINANCE O FTHE CI- Subscribed and sworn to before me, this the 1 3 t OF SOUK HILAKET TEXIAS,e r, 1 9 8 8 PLAN/LAND USE APLAN Notary Public UAL;PROV D NGA EVER ABILITY CLAUSE:PROVID -"h ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Texas, pc4".'h-Q"c". ""12"1„.1,,I.7.... City of Southlake 1 DEBRA MORR!S Sandra L.LeGrand ," Notary FubllcCity Secretary *„ STATE OF TEXAS •r' My Comm. Exp.Oct.23,1991 R • CURRENT - UMBER ON RECPT 9/09 - 9/09 CIT57 IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING YOUR ACCOUNT,PLEASE CONTACT OUR CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT AT(817)390-7761.TO ASSIST US IN AN ACCURATE AND TIMELY POSTING OF YOUR PAYMENTS,PLEASE MAIL ALL PAYMENTS TO P.O.BOX 99074 FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76199. TEAR ALONG THIS PERFORATION AND RETURN THE LOWER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT ----.L ADVERTISING STATEMENT PortREMIT TO P O BOX 99074 • FORT WORTH, TEXAS 761 6202462 ACCOUNTR NUMBER CIT57 PAYMENT DUE DATE ON RECPT 1 PAGE OF CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ORIGINAL 667 N CARROLL PLEASE PAY ii 10 . 85 SOUTHLAKE TX 76092 0 THIS AMOUNT A T T N : 7ANi1RA LEGRAND PLEASE WRITE IN AMOUNT ENCLOSED