Item 6ACase No.
ZA20-0029
S T A F F R E P O R T
November 30, 2021
CASE NO: ZA20-0029
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon Parc
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Carillon Parc Development Partners and Hunter Chase Development Partners are
requesting 2nd Reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for
Carillon Parc (Plaza District) on property described as Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G,
3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, and 3A01B, Larkin H. Chivers Survey,
Abstract No. 300, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1775,
1781 and 1801 N. White Chapel Blvd., 1840 Riviera Ln ., 201 E. Kirkwood Blvd.,
1700 N. Carroll Ave. (addressed as 1900 N. Carroll Ave. by Tarrant Appraisal
District) and 100 through 300 E. State Hwy. 114, generally located east of N. White
Chapel Blvd., south of E. Kirkwood Blvd., west of Riviera Ln., and no rth of E. State
Hwy. 114. Current Zoning: “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District. Proposed
Zoning: “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District. SPIN Neighborhood #3.
DETAILS: The purpose of this item is to seek 2nd Reading approval of a Zoning Change and
Development Plan for the Plaza District portion (approximately 42.51 acres) of the
Carillon Development for the purposes of amending the existing district regulations
and approved development plan for this portion of Carillon.
This application represents a Development Plan. If this Zoning Change and
Development Plan is approved by City Council, approval of Site Plan(s) by City
Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission will
be required for all residential lofts and non-residential buildings (excluding kiosks)
prior to issuance of building permits.
Since the City Council meeting on November 16, 2021, the applicant has revised
the plans and exhibits to reflect the Option ‘B’ plan that was approved at 1st
reading. The Option ‘B’ plan shows the previous location of the
library/multipurpose building being replaced with a new residential loft/retail mixed-
use building with 25 lofts over one level of retail and a supporting parking garage.
The Option ‘B’ plan also indicates 5 new single family lots (Villa Product) along
Rivera Lane. The developer has designated an area at the southeast portion of the
site as an alternate use area to include retail, restaurant, office, hotel, chapel, and
library/performing arts/multi-purpose uses. Detailed engineering and development
of the alternate use area will be delayed for s ix months to allow the city time to
determine the need for and location of a library. The revised zoning document
exhibits that will be added to the final zoning bo oklet, if approved at 2nd reading,
and a zoning booklet with markups showing the changes to be made are attached
separately along with the revised development plan, the applicant’s presentation
and a table of the changes to be made to the boo klet. The applicant is working to
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA20-0029
obtain additional renderings that will depict the expanded mixed-use, retail over loft
building as well as a rendering of a potential library configuration at the southeast
portion of the site.
The Development Plan Site Data Summary Table is below:
VARIANCE
REQUESTED: The street connections to E. SH 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. are functionally
like commercial driveways. Per the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, the minimum
stacking depth from the SH114 & N. White Chapel would be 150’. Approximately
40 feet and 110’ are p rovided respectively.
Case No.
ZA20-0029
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider 2nd Reading approval of a Zoning Change and Development
Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Development Plan Review Summary No. 6, dated November 30, 2021
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-564e
Li nk to Applicant’s Presentation
Link to Zoning Document Exhibits
Link to Development Plan – Option ‘B’
Link to Carillon Zoning Booklet with Markups
Link to Table of Changes to Zoning Booklet
Link to Carillon Parking Table Updated 11-01-2021
Link to TIA Vol. 1 (pdf only)
Link to TIA Vol. 2 (pdf only)
Link to Consultant’s Review of TIA
Link to SPIN Meeting Report
Link to 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report
Link to Comprehensive Plan Review
Link to Responses within 300’ as of 11-30-2021 (pdf only)
Link to Responses outside 300’ as of 11-30-2021 (pdf only)
Link to Responses received with no address as of 11-30-2021 (pdf only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0029 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Carillon Parc Development Partners
APPLICANT: Hunter Chase Development Partners
PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located east of N. White Chapel Blvd., south of E. Kirkwood
Blvd., west of Riviera Ln., and north of E. State HWY 114.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A0 4, 3A04A, 3A05, and
3A01B, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District
HISTORY: May 20, 1997; City Council approved a zoning c hange and concept plan to
“NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development.
December 18, 2001; City Council approved a zoning change and concept
plan requiring a 300 ft. setback on N. Carroll Avenue, subject to City
Council discretion. The purpose o f the zoning change and concept plan
was to incorporate newly acquired tracts of land into the existing “NR-
PUD”, revise parcel boundaries and permitted uses within the dis trict.
On November 18, 2008 the City Council ap proved a Zoning Change and
Development Plan from ‘NR-PUD’ Non-Residential Planned Unit
Development and ‘C-2’ Local Retail Commercial District to ‘ECZ’
Employment Center Zoning District for Carillon under Planning Case ZA08-
031 (Ordinance No. 480-564).
September 4, 2012; City Council approved the request to amend
miscellaneous development regu lations in the Carillon Zoning Booklet
under Planning Case ZA12-066 (Ordinance No. 480-564a).
November 6, 2014; Jacobs Engineering, Inc. on behalf of Hines Interest,
LP requested at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on November
6, 2014 to table indefinitely two applications: a Site Plan application for
One Carillon Court (ZA18-085) and a Zoning Change and Development
Plan application for the Carillon Corporate District (ZA14-102).
April 21, 2015; City Council voted to deny a 1st Reading request for a
Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon under Planning Case
ZA15-002 (Ordinance No. 564b). The purpose of this request was to
amend the current Carillon Zoning Book to add a roofing material permitted
in the EC Neighborhood - Chateaux District. The proposal intended to add
language that would have allowed metal as a permitted roof material to
Chateaux District.
April 18, 2017; Jacobs Engineering, Inc. on beh alf of Hines Interest, LP
requested to withdrawal the following Planning Cases at the April 18, 2017
City Council meeting:
• ZA16-029 (Ordinance. No. 480-564B) – Zoning Change and
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0029 Page 2
Development Plan for Carillon Corporate District
• ZA16-030 – Site Plan for Hotel Indigo Carillon
• ZA16-031 – Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Carillon –
Hotel Indigo
• Also at the April 18, 2017 City Coun cil meeting, The City of
Southlake withdrew Planning Case ZA17-071 (Ordinance No. 480-
564C), which was a proposed Zoning Change and Development
Plan for Carillon Plaza District.
The following Planning Cases rela ted to the Carillon Plaza District were
withdrawn by staff due to inactivity; the applicant d id not ever make a
formal submittal:
• ZA16-081 – Site Plan for Carillon Salons of Volterra
• ZA16-082 – Site Plan for Carillon Wellness Center and Spa
• ZA16-083 – Preliminary Plat for the Carillon Plaza District
On June 19, 2018, the City Council approved a Zoning Change and
Development Plan (ZA18-0006) for the Plaza District portion
(approximately 42.51 acres) of the Carillon Development for the purposes
of amending the existing district regulations and approved development
plan for this portion of Carillon.
SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A detailed Comprehensive Plan Review has been prepared for this
development. (Attached separately)
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared fo r the previous Carillon Parc
submittal in 2018. Please see the TIA and Consultant’s Review of TIA
attached separately.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for this project on September 28, 2021.
Please see the meeting report attached separately.
A Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on
August 23, 2021. Please see the meeting report attached separately.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: October 21, 2021; Approved (5-1) subject to the staff report dated October
15, 2021 and Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October
15, 2021 and:
o Further acknowledging the agreement of the developer to ensure
that there is landscaping fronting Riviera Ln. in the event that the
HOA does not approve the assimilation of this proj ect into the
existing Carillon HOA,
o Acknowledging the developer’s agreement to continue to have
discussions with the City and the Parks Board surrounding
maintenance of the fountain itself and the water features,
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0029 Page 3
o Acknowledging that the site infrastructure, the park and the
fountains are all part of Phase I and before those are completed,
there is no release of residential lots until such time they are
completed and the infrastructure has been accepted by the City,
o Subject to an agreement by the developer to take forward to City
Council additional renderings for the library screening as
recommended and as agreed to in the discussions with the
residents across from the library and,
o Further approving the variances as requested by the deve loper.
Commissioner Dyche was opposed to the multi-family units in the
development.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: November 2, 2021; Tabled to the November 16, 2021 meeting (6-0).
November 16, 2021; Approved at 1st reading (5-1) (Robbins) subject to the
Staff Report dated November 9, 2021, and Development Plan Review
Summary No. 5, dated October 26, 2021, granting the following:
- Approving the variance to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. The
minimum stacking depth from the SH114 & N. White Chapel is
150’. Approximately 40’ feet and 110 ’ are provided.
And noting the following:
- Approving Option B concept plan. Approving the new phasing plan
which requires the developer to install the Phase I site
infrastructure (roadway and utilities) and residential screening wall
as shown on the plan and allowing the developer to begin
construction on all residential lots following the completion and
acceptance by the City.
- Also approving the zoning booklet as presented with exc eption
previously noted in the motion.
- Applicant shall provide screening wall renderings at 2nd reading.
- Applicant has agreed that certificates of occupancy for the
commercial sites will not be issued before the park is completed.
- The City and the applicant have agreed on the date of June 30,
2022 for the City to take time to assess future library locations, and
to determine if the Carillon location is the appropriate location for a
future library.
- Staff will work with the developer with acc eptable criteria for a
potential library to be considered for Carill on during the time
between now and June 30, 2022.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 6, dated November
30, 2021
Case No. Attachment B
ZA20-0029 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0029 Page 1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA20-0029 Review No.: Six Date of Review: 11/30/21
Project Name: Zoning Change and Development Plan – Carillon Parc
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Carillon Parc Development Partners Hunter Chase Development Partners
John Terrell John Terrell
161 Summit Ave., Suite 200, Southlake, Texas 161 Summit Ave., Suite 200, Southlake, Texas
Phone: (817) 253-8355 Phone: (817) 253-8355
Email: JTerrell@HCDevelopmentPartners.com Email: JTerrell@HCDevelopmentPartners.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/29/21 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072.
Planning Comments
1. Revise the Site Data Summary Table on the Development Plan to refle ct the changes to the plan
since the November 16, 2021 City Council meeting.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Revi ew
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* A Tree Conservation Analysis was submitted as part of the Zoning Doc ument. If the proposed
development was straight zoning, the proposed existing tree canopy cover preservation would not
comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation
Ordinance. There is 38.4% (16.3 acres) of existing tree cover on the site and a minimum of 60%
(9.78 acres) of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. A Total of 33% (5.4
acres) of existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Pr eservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree
cover that must be preserved under this section.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0029 Page 2
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preserva tion Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for th e Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider
the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding
development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission
shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding th e
application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan
or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as
to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature
tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant g rades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover pre servation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man -made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council a pproved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and pro tected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0029 Page 3
1. Within the Zoning Document Section 2.0 – Streetscape Standards, The minimum size of t he tree
wells does not comply with the Zoning Ordinance Section 49.8 Streetscape Standards of tree
wells to be a minimum of 6’ x 6’, and planting strips a minimum of 6 feet – 8 feet.
2. Within the Zoning Document Section 6.0 – Site Design Standards, the proposed parking lot
islands width does not comply with the Landscape Ordinance 544B required width a 12’.
Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12’ back -to-back if curbed or 13’ edge-to-
edge if no curb is intended and shall be equal to the l ength of the parking stall.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Sandra Endy , P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of the civil
construction plans.
2. The driveway off White Chapel is not shown on the color exhibits. Please update the color
exhibits to reflect the access off White Chapel.
3. The White Chapel roadway improvements will be required to be appro ved and constructed
concurrent with the onsite civil construction plans. Per direction from the Public Works Director,
the full roadway section for White Chapel shall be constructed. If right-of-way cannot be obtained
along the west side of White Chapel, the roadway section shall be shifted to the e ast to allow for
the full right-of-way dedication.
4. Please update the TIA to reflect the site layout changes, and to assess the proposed access
points. Will only having two access points for the commercial de velopment be adequate? Please
also ensure the TIA reflects the projection of how traffic volumes will increase based on routes
people will take.
5. The street connections to E. SH 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. are functionally like commercial
driveways. Per the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, the minimum stacking de pth from the SH114 &
N. White Chapel would be 150’. Approximately 40 feet and 110’ a re provided respectively.
6. Preliminary utility plan, grading plan, and existing and proposed drainage area maps can be
deferred to the Site Plan submittal. Please be aware that any increase in sewer flow to each
sewer basin will require the existing sewer analysis, provided to the City in 2018, to be updated.
Also, drainage calculations shall follow the
7. It was mentioned that there will be a retaining wall along the driv e just south of the residential.
Please be aware that a safety rail will be require d to be placed at the top of the retaining wall.
Also, retaining walls taller than 4’, measured from the bottom of footing to the top of the wall, will
require a separate building permit.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0029 Page 4
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
1. Fire lanes must be a minimum of 26 feet wide, for access to the high -rise building, and 24 feet
wide for all others, with a 6-inch red striping that contains 4-inch white lettering that states "FIRE
LANE NO PARKING" every 25 feet. Also, a minimum clearance height of 14 feet is required.
(Using the scale indicated on the pla ns, the fire lanes do not measure to be 26 feet wide on the
plans in the area depicted as a 26 wide fire lane)
2. Ensure that the fire lanes intersect with and provide access to White Chapel Boulevard and State
Highway 114. (Plans do not indicate a connecti on to either of these roadways)
3. One or more of the required aerial apparatus access routes, fire lanes, shall be located not less
than 15 feet and not greater than 30 feet from the buildings, and shall be positioned parallel to one
entire side of the building. (Adjust fire lanes to meet this requirement)
4. Depending on the exact square footage of the chapel, anything in excess of 6,000 square feet
must be equipped with a fire suppression system. If it is equipped with a fire suppression system,
then the hose lay distance is allowed at 250 feet, which can be ob tained with the current fire lane
layout indicated on the plans. If the structure is not equipped with a fire suppression system, then
only 150 of hose lay distance is allowed, and the current fire l ane configuration will not be
sufficient to meet the req uirements.
General Informational Comments
* The Ordinance Number for this reques t is 480-564e. Through this request (ZA20-0029), the
applicant is proposing an amendment to the currently approved o rdinance for Carillon Parc, which
is 480-564d. Please reference Ord. No. 480-564e when referring to the proposed amendment to
Carillon Parc. Ord. No. 564a will stay in place, apart from the changes within approved Ord. No.
564d or those proposed in Ord. No . 564e, if approved. If approved, Ord. No. 480-564e would
completely replace Ord. No. 564d.
* The residential Villas will be served by a p rivate alley – the developer / applicant should
contact Republic Waste Services to determine the needs for garbage / recycling access. The
number for customer service is (8 17) 317-2424.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended .
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0029 Page 5
* It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay
Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compa tible
Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
* Masonry materials shall be as approved and defined in the Carillon Zoning Booklet.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21,
Building Color Standards for Non -Residential Buildings, unless otherwise approved under the
ECZ district of this property.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issua nce of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a n approved fully corrected site plan,
landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all
required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park
Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fee s, and related Permit Fees.
Plats are only accepted for processing in accordance with the Plat Submittal Schedule -
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/302/Applications-Fees-Submittal-Schedules , and only after
appropriate zoning approvals for the proposed subd ivision.
* All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended).
* The subject property lies within the City’s SH 114 Land Use Corridor and falls within the
Employment Center Optional Land Use in the Future Land Use Plan. The site has
Employment Center Zoning (ECZ) and thus must comply with Section 49 of the Zoning
Ordinance and the specific regulations approved under this zoning district.
* All development must comply with the underlying zoning district re gulations.
* With Site Plan and/or Plat submittal an o pen space management plan may be required.
* Consider adding a note that states all square footage, building heights, stories, etc. illustrated
on the plan are representative only.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water
customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the
City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final
plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City
of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* The Development Plan and any future Site Plans must comply with the underlying zoning
regulations of the Carillon Parc zoning booklet, as approved.
* Ensure that all trails comply with the Pathways Master Plan.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA20-0029 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Carillon Parc – Plaza District
Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. KHAN, ASHRUF ALI AG
1975 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.18 NR
2. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 250 E SH 114 3.62 NR
3. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 100 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.63 NR
4. KHAN, ASHRUF ALI AG
1965 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.86 NR
5. LEE, CHARLES ECZ 100 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.39 NR
6. DAVENPORT, DANIEL F ECZ 104 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
7. MCGOWEN, MILTON ECZ 105 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.37 F
8. GOLLA, HEMANTHA ECZ 101 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.37 F
9. SATANI, DHAVAL D ECZ 209 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
10. WALKER, ANDREW T ECZ 213 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
11. MARINELLI, RODNEY ECZ 301 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
12. CRANE, MARY E ECZ 305 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR
13. HUSAIN, ASIF ECZ 1801 RIVIERA LN 0.14 NR
14. ATWOOD, TODD ECZ 1845 RIVIERA LN 0.14 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA20-0029 Page 2
15. LARDIS, KRISTOPHER ECZ 1841 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
16. KHALIL, ISHAQUE K ECZ 1837 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
17. GUTHRIE, JACQUELINE ECZ 1833 RIVIERA LN 0.12 F
18. PATTERSON, BRIAN ECZ 1829 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
19. BRYCE, DANIEL L ECZ 1825 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
20. LEE, ERVING ECZ 1821 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
21. FRANDSEN, CHRISTOPHER ECZ 1817 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
22. BENOIT, ROBERT ECZ 1813 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
23. FLURY, JANE ECZ 1809 RIVIERA LN 0.13 F
24. CLARK, JAMES C ECZ 1805 RIVIERA LN 0.13 NR
25. MICHELSEN FAMILY LIVING TRUST, ECZ 1800 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.20 NR
26. MANDARA, FRANCESCO ECZ 1804 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.20 F
27. SHAW, DEREK DURAND ECZ 1808 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18 F
28. ALFORD, CARL S ECZ 1812 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18 F
29. JACK, HAYDEN ECZ 1816 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18 NR
30. PARK, JEFFREY ECZ 1820 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.26 F
31. ORF, TONY ECZ 405 MONTE CARLO DR 0.18 NR
32. EAMSHERANGKOON, KRIDDANAT ECZ 401 MONTE CARLO DR 0.19 NR
33. MILLER, JAMES ECZ 1713 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
34. ELVING, CARL ECZ 1709 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
35. CLARK, ROBERT K ECZ 1701 RIVIERA LN 0.17 F
36. MISRA, NILAMBEN R ECZ 1705 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
37. ORTIZ, LOUIS M ECZ 400 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.15 NR
38. MOCHULSKY, RICHARD ECZ 402 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 F
39. LASSITER, TODD ECZ 404 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR
40. DEVINENI, NAGA ECZ 403 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR
41. WEBB, GREG ECZ 405 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR
42. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 1750 LE MANS LN 0.48 NR
43. BURCH, MIKE J ECZ 1633 RIVIERA LN 0.16 NR
44. COUCH JOHN AND PEGGY
REVOCABLE ECZ 1629 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
45. DUNCAN, BRIAN ECZ 1625 RIVIERA LN 0.12 F
46. BIEKER, RON ECZ 1621 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
47. MCCAW, NEIL ECZ 1617 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
48. RUCCI, COREY ECZ 1613 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
49. BATOOL, FATIMA ECZ 1609 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR
50. DANCE, DAVID ECZ 1601 RIVIERA LN 0.21 NR
51. SMITH, MICHAEL ECZ 1605 RIVIERA LN 0.12 F
52. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 400 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.91 NR
53. VISSERS EMILY A REVOCABLE FAMI ECZ 310 MONTPELIER DR 0.17 NR
54. PERRY, RICHARD B ECZ 308 MONTPELIER DR 0.13 NR
55. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1700 N CARROLL AVE 8.01 NR
56. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 300 E SH 114 3.94 NR
57. MARCIANO, PAUL ECZ 1717 RIVIERA LN 0.15 NR
58. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1840 RIVIERA LN 2.33 NR
59. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 201 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 1.69 NR
60. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ
1801 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 10.50 NR
61. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1781 N WHITE CHAPEL 3.07 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA20-0029 Page 3
BLVD
62. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ
1775 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 0.32 NR
63. BROWN, CHRISTOPHER ECZ 300 ORLEANS DR 0.48 NR
64. MEISNER, JEFFREY ECZ 401 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.16 F
65. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 1650 LE MANS LN 0.36 NR
66. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 300 CARILLON CT 0.15 NR
67. MCKELLAR TRUST ECZ 300 MONTPELIER DR 0.24 NR
68. LANIER LIVING TRUST (STARK
CURRENT OWNER) ECZ 304 MONTPELIER DR 0.15 F
69. SHARON R. BELL LIVING TRUST ECZ 306 MONTPELIER DR 0.13 NR
70. ILINENI, VISHNU ECZ 400 MONTPELIER DR 0.36 NR
71. CARILLON PARC CORPORATE DISTRI ECZ 360 E SH 114 9.02 NR
72. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 350 ORLEANS DR 0.83 NR
73. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 401 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.67 NR
74. WATERS, TIMOTHY ECZ 301 MONTPELIER DR 0.19 NR
75. BARNES, BRITTON ECZ 303 MONTPELIER DR 0.15 F
76. IRWIN, PATTI J ECZ 305 MONTPELIER DR 0.16 NR
77. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 100 E SH 114 4.60 NR
78. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 190 E SH 114 1.29 NR
79. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 200 E SH 114 1.05 NR
80. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMEN T PART ECZ 240 E SH 114 0.76 NR
81. ZVONECEK, BRIAN SP1
1700 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.51 NR
82. SHIVERS, FRANCES BIRD EST AG
1800 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 1.20 NR
83. HOPKINS DALLAS PROPERTIES LTD C2 140 W SH 114 0.85 NR
84. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES SP2
1451 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 10.05 NR
85. METHODIST HOSPITALS OF DALLAS SP2 335 E SH 114 15.09 NR
86. CHAPEL OWNER LP SP2 245 W SH 114 4.52 NR
87. CHAPEL CROSSING MEDICAL LTD SP2 275 W SH 114 1.73 NR
88. SHIVERS FAMILY PTNRSHIP LTD AG
1900 N WHITE CHAPEL
BLVD 39.08 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent within 300’: Seventy-four (74)
Responses Received, P&Z and City Council Comment Cards within 300’: Fifteen (15) In Favor
Link to responses, P&Z and City Council comment cards within 300’
Responses Received , P&Z and City Council Comment Cards outside 300’
Link to responses, P&Z and City Council comment cards outside 300’
Responses Received with No Address
Link to responses received with no address
Case No. Attachment E
ZA20-0029 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-564e
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03,
3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, AND 3A01B, LARKIN H. CHIVERS SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 300, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT
COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 1775, 1781 AND 1801 N.
WHITE CHAPEL BLVD., 1840 RIVIERA LN., 201 E. KIRKWOOD
BLVD., 1700 N. CARROLL AVE. (ADDRESSED AS 1900 N.
CARROLL AVE. BY TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT) AND 100
THROUGH 300 E. STATE HWY. 114, GENERALLY LOCATED
EAST OF N. WHITE CHAPEL BLVD., SOUTH OF E. KIRKWOOD
BLVD., WEST OF RIVIERA LN., AND NORTH OF E. STATE HWY
114, BEING APPROXIMATELY 42.51 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY
AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “ECZ”
EMPLOYMENT CENTER ZONING DISTRICT TO “ECZ”
EMPLOYMENT CENTER ZONING DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON
THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO
AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B, SUBJECT TO
THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS
ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and
Case No. Attachment E
ZA20-0029 Page 2
to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “ECZ” Employment
Center Zoning District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;
noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights
on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of
signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-
street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading
spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on
the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-
crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportatio n,
water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
Case No. Attachment E
ZA20-0029 Page 3
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest
clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the
rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed
at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there
has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close p roximity to the
tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally
classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or
tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the
citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare
of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is
hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter describe d areas be altered,
Case No. Attachment E
ZA20-0029 Page 4
changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05,
and 3A01B, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas and located at 1775, 1781 and 1801 N. White Chapel Blvd., 1840
Riviera Ln., 201 E. Kirkwood Blvd., 1700 N. Carroll Ave. (addressed as 1900 N.
Carroll Ave. by Tarrant Appraisal District) and 100 through 300 E. State Hwy. 114,
generally located east of N. White Chapel Blvd., south of E. Kirkwood Blvd., west
of Riviera Ln., and north of E. State HWY 114, being approximately 42.51 acres,
and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “ECZ” Employment
Center Zoning District to “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District as depicted on
the approved Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following conditions:
RESERVED FOR CITY COUNCIL MOTION
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance
are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of
land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of
Case No. Attachment E
ZA20-0029 Page 5
transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs
and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with
reasonable consideration among other thin gs of the character of the district and its peculiar
suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that
if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of
said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
Case No. Attachment E
ZA20-0029 Page 6
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,
and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation
of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the
official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required
by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the ____ day of ____, 2021.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment E
ZA20-0029 Page 7
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the ____ day of _____, 2021.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment E
ZA20-0029 Page 8
EXHIBIT “A”
Being described as Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, and 3A01B,
Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and
located at 1775, 1781 and 1801 N. White Chapel Blvd., 1840 Riviera Ln., 201 E. Kirkwood Blvd.,
1700 N. Carroll Ave. (addressed as 1900 N. Carroll Ave. by Tarrant Appraisal District) and 100
through 300 E. State Hwy. 114, generally located east of N. White Chapel Blvd., south of E.
Kirkwood Blvd., west of Riviera Ln., and north of E. State HWY 114, being approximately 42.51
acres, and more fully and completely described as follows:
RESERVED FOR METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
Case No. Attachment E
ZA20-0029 Page 9
EXHIBIT “B”
RESERVED FOR APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN