Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Ordinance No. 480-671c
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-671c AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING DESCRIBED AS LOT 3-R-1, BLOCK 1, OF THE GEORGETOWN PARK ADDITION, SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY .89 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive Ordinance No. 480-474c plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District With "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular Ordinance No.480-474c uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Ordinance No. 480-474c SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Lot 3-R-1, Block 1 of the Georgetown Park Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, located at 2525 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," and subject to the following: Ordinance 480-671 (ZA14-059): September 16, 2014; Approved (7-0) pursuant to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated September 9, 2014. Site Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated 9-9-2014 Planning Review 1. Verify that the building area and floor area (existing and proposed) are correct. Any additional landscape area will be based on the new added building area (footprint). Parking requirements will be based on the floor area by use. Adjust the parking ratio in the proposed regulations as needed. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The existing trees that are proposed to be altered for the building and parking additions are existing landscaping that was installed with the original development. The original Site Plan was approved in 1998 and the landscaping is not required to be maintained in perpetuity. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. The proposed ±1,500 square foot first floor addition is less than 30% of the existing first floor building area and the development Site Plan was approved in 1998 so the existing landscaping is not required to be maintained in perpetuity. Only landscaping for 50% of the proposed building addition, and parking is required to be provided. It appears that Ordinance No. 480-474c approximately 750 sf of additional interior landscaping will be required. 2. The proposed parking landscape islands are required to contain at least the minimum of one (1) canopy tree and remaining area consisting of shrubs, ornamental grasses, ground cover, seasonal color, or a combination of these plant materials. Since the required parking lot landscaping is off site, it does not count toward the required interior landscaping. Indicates informational comment. Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review GENERAL COMMENTS: This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. An encroachment agreement shall be required for the porte-cochere which will be constructed over an existing 10' drainage easement. EASEMENTS: 1. Proposed 24" storm sewer is located outside of the property boundary. Provide a minimum 15' drainage easement for the relocation of the storm sewer. Proposed easement shall be dedicated by plat and the existing easement abandoned by plat along the relocated portion of the storm sewer. 2. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. Storm drain cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Provide a storm sewer layout of the proposed storm sewer. 2. Provide record drawings of the drainage area map and storm drain layout for the development. Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review GENERAL COMMENTS: Since the building is equipped with an automatic fire protection system, proper sprinkler Ordinance No. 480-474c system coverage must be provided throughout the building to meet the requirements of NFPA 13. Fire sprinkler system coverage must be continued into the new tow-story addition and the porte-cochere addition. If more than 20 sprinkler heads are added or relocated, submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001, for review and approval. Reed Fire Protection phone number is 214-638-7599. Since the building is already equipped with audible/visual fire alarm devices, coverage must be continued into all areas of the building to maintain compliance with the 2012 International Fire Code and NFPA 72 throughout the structure. Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection for review and approval. General Informational Comments • No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan, including monument signs. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. • All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. • The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. The use of synthetic products (e.g., EIFS — exterior insulation and finish systems, hardy plank, or other materials) shall not be considered as masonry material. (As amended by Ordinance 480-PPP) • Mechanical Equipment Screening: All buildings must be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite dishes shall be visible from any rights-of-way as defined in Section 43.19.d. This shall include equipment on the roof, on the ground or otherwise attached to the building or located on the site. Rooftop mechanical equipment and / or other rooftop appurtenance screening shall be accomplished by either the construction of 1) the roof systems described in subparagraph (b) above or 2) an architectural feature which is integral to the building's design and ensures that such equipment is not visible from ROW as defined in Section 43.19.d.. The fencing of or enclosure of individual mechanical units shall not be permitted except as described above. • Denotes Informational Comment Ordinance No. 480-474c SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE ZA1a-11159 2525 E.Soiithlake Blvd. SP-I USE AND REGULATION DOCUMENT ChangeZoning Application SP-I with C-2 Uses limited to Local Retail Commercial Far 2M5 E.Satohlike Beulerr.d,wr Ile requ g 5P-1 Zoning with C-3 use,limited m Local Retail Canteen WA. The property is an existing site and blotting that was developed as pest of the Georgetown Paris Development. Since truer.•itt'NM?uhditidesl and lob,u+m:10.1111 hr4Yidually• hag melt,cog:Erg rsrp1C,tin3 fora eau k t bulb lint at the eastern side of the property.We also ask foram increase of imper«wus ooveragi indicated on the See Data Sunwary Ciao. The property wean:.International NiBC.Inc.(Pieter Andries Rye',intends to add a pane cvchere at the east side of the eicibliifs build*. The e7tirtinp 24".loan dam pipe lush suit within the existing I0'draitutie,.a�eriLn t will he mimed to the west underneath Ike pone oachere x,stay clear oldie parte cae:here fam4rtrotr sus ictute. The eunOr+retirm ref ting:plebe embers:will obeli roguing Ilia relesplitin of rho ov u tg alixtraal tr innirinrar gm t11N kite. The owner uuesus to add Soar prrkigtl,spaces,at the odious property and provide Laghime to otinply with The Landscape Ordwar a No.54'+-$. The rain level attire prep two story oddities at den southwest sorter will moist of c iciroi 1 rlrthecxirting*Aden +loop. The sound L`tel tgnlc lwu okay addition ugi aeeananudaft it ecnile 24,r7 surveillance u ti 'Ile casting budding Ins brick aid snwcouldt.Writ awning;at the north side of the twisting Ile propound 2 story addition and pnrte cachere will be constructed using the same materials in keeping with tie same deem of the essi+limp buildvg. Porpatasi ars filgie:n►rting awfvgs Nr nab b oti>,tyng at the north Neon wall urlhe prgie,--•hie and at the northwest tower as indiAlued cal the colored ekvatiox e. Due to the ptap<xei peat todicat and Wilding addition ott the sotuhwem canner_the tmperrtous coverage exceeds the allowed iuipertious c avenge unxier the current 0.2 voicing by 5%. Part of the SP.i request is to allow for this .lirelfIct irlirkkrI A 4iI etirv�r t LfirCg�lla(t Cavemen!p4(rum die P1s,er ig Review Weetincna Miley.to provide end ial,cl s pcd c lrisn ana:eu plat tks thv>dte. The site,bulk1..and pedesale n WON s ore existing and mill nru be aharbd by the proposed rwu nary uiditiai or the uvpa od pate wharf. Carmen!Ml l says to label ih g cmlerlulr*sown ftc.the drirre'cait t,the moist street ritabove.uay and in the murWa arititnvy cmberhne+in lvdr shrtioilos. The F.risyUFxit drug:art cstiarkg and will sat be altered by the proposed two scary addition or the proposed'vox cohere. the a ci tiig trees on the property will UMIAK and be pruned. Mafia lla shrubs and seamed ground cover will be provided per bolbcape radiance requirements as indicated on rile plan ntbrrtittai sheet. The prtposed parking hull/wept island wilt comma u a nniniffYrn!or one tamp'fret mil rebtagirrlg area eiltd atiq orrhruto.atrtcwtrutal grasses_pond cover_seat color_or a oe bination od*ese plrta mer trials. The sue plan review summary bourn to,:leery the boffeayueb:sumetmy thin an the She Plan as the clan and sae plan et allict. No lgdGsyardts are regvired based on 411a Undssape Ordirfno;-Section 4:-B aftoryt s-Paragraph 42.4 C which itnrpi Iltnt tonne existing building and tet a that+1oc nor ortertate buriding.%rsare Wage by mass term 30 r.no new butTeryardl are required. This°dimnce orormatien hart been referenced oa the Site Plan Submittal sheet. bin huffetyards art indicated ue the site plan. The site plan rt:c•ien•summary noted to provide a Tree Cansenaaan Plan The existing tens that are proposed to be altered fix the building gold periwig sainteets me atrtlrtd lam hug SW 1125 metalled with the original development. The original Site Plea was approved in 1998 and the landscaping is not required to be aaoiaand in perpetuity. No Tree Conservation Phan is required er has been provided. The existing Imes to remain shall be prolecled from damage daring the building renc*Naliun as per city comfen ice. A tree protection plan has been provided. A new colored landscape and tree protection plea hive been provided as noted in the site plan review sumantry. Also included are ixilnred truilelmg eleti•ara•'ttp.with ilathen6k',14 and building ana:ulatanro. Ordinance No. 480-474c Ordinance 480-671a (ZA17-103): February 6, 2018; Approved (6-0) on the consent agenda for 1st Reading; granting the landscape ordinance variance as presented this evening. February 20, 2018: Approved (7-0) at 2nd Reading; subject to the Staff Report dated February 13, 2018, and the Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated January 12, 2018; noting we are approving the applicant's request for a variance to the Landscape Ordinance 544-B to allow the landscape as depicted on the proposed landscape plan. Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated 1-12-2018 Planning Review 2. One 10' x 50' loading space is required since the floor area now exceeds 10,000 square feet. Please show and label the required loading space or add an S-P-1 regulation proposing no loading space on the site and provide a justification. S-P-1 regulation provided 3. Please contact Keith Martin, the City's Landscape Administrator, for guidance on preparing the required Tree Conservation Plan and Landscape Plan to be submitted. Since the floor area is increasing by more than 30%, the entire site must meet the requirements of the current Landscape Ordinance. If the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance cannot or will not be met, please add regulations to the S-P-1 regulations stating how the proposed landscape materials will differ from the required plantings. Variance Requested Informational Comment: The construction of the new addition on the east side of the existing building will require the relocation of the electric transformer to the south side of the building (west of the proposed secured vehicle entrance drive). Additionally, the existing 24-inch storm drain pipe will need to be relocated west of the existing easement to allow the construction of the addition per the Public Works Department comments in Staff Review No. 2. An encroachment joint use agreement will need to be executed to allow the building to be constructed over the drainage easement. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. Nine (9) existing landscape trees that qualify as protected trees are proposed to be removed. Please provide a Tree Conservation Plan which complies with the Tree Conservation Plan submittal requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Information required for Tree Conservation Plan: Identification of Critical Environmental Features of the site: A. All individually protected trees Ordinance No.480-474c B. Existing streams, drainage creeks, ponds, and other water bodies (if any) ii. Tree Survey or alternative to a tree survey iii. 2-foot contour map of the site iv. Protected trees within the tree preservation area including tree size and type v. Critical Root Zones of groups of trees vi. Critical Root Zones for individual trees required for site plans only vii. Boundaries of any tree preservation areas as identified in the ERP Map viii. Identification of areas of environmental constraints not suitable for development ix. Identification of areas of minimal environmental constraints that are suitable for development x. Areas of encroachment into Critical Environmental Features identified on the site xi. Clear delineation, for each protected tree, of whether the tree will be preserved after the proposed development is constructed, altered due to proposed improvements, or could potentially be saved based upon site specific conditions xii. Stream/Creek buffers, if any xiii. Detailed site plan of all proposed improvements. (All proposed improvements shall be required to be shown only at the site plan stage for all development. Preliminary plats shall, however, show building setbacks and general location of buildings and infrastructure.) xiv. Setbacks, building lines, and buffer yards xv. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of those persons or entities who own the property and those persons or entities filing the application xvi. Such additional information as the Administrative Official may reasonably require given the particular characteristics of the property Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the the entire site existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% —20% 70% 20.1 —40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in Ordinance No.480-474c conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man- made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. The proposed additional building square footage exceeds 30% the existing building square footage and the property is proposed to be rezoned. All interior landscape and bufferyard requirements are required to be met. Please provide a landscape plan which encompasses the entire property and shows interior landscaping and bufferyards. Variance requested Interior Landscape Requirement: INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIREMENTS: The amount of landscape area required on the interior of the lot (excludes bufferyards) shall be based on the square footage of the proposed buildings. The square footage of the building for the purposes of this ordinance will be the square footage of the first floor or the square footage of the largest floor, whichever is greater. Bufferyard Requirement: CHANGES IN ZONING: Any request for changes in zoning to any district other than Ordinance No.480-474c agricultural or single-family residential districts shall require that all required bufferyards and associated irrigation be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the proposed use. New construction which increases the square footage of the existing building by thirty percent (30%) or greater or which exceeds 5000 square feet shall be required to meet the bufferyard requirements. 2. More existing landscaping is proposed to be removed than replaced. Since the interior landscape and bufferyard regulations are required to be met, all existing landscape on the lot must be shown. There may be enough existing landscaping on the site to meet the requirements but without it shown to be provided for it cannot be quantified. 3 All parking planter islands in parking areas shall contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses or seasonal color. Planter islands which have light poles for lighting the parking areas may substitute two (2) understory/accent trees for the required canopy tree. 4. Provide and Engineer's Scale Plan. 5. For all lots greater than 30,000 square feet, Landscape Plans shall be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review GENERAL COMMENTS: 3. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 4. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 5. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet, if applicable. 6. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Ordinance No.480-474c • Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. • Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. • Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?N1D=266 DRAINAGE COMMENTS: I have reviewed the Pieter Andries plans and gone through the history of the previous request for the porte-cochere. I have verified that the plan was approved with the slab and porte-cochere structure over an existing/relocated storm drainpipe. From a philosophical viewpoint, the new request is not much of a variation from what was previously approved. The first and best option from the Public Works side would be to get a drainage easement to the west of the structure where the four parking spaces are proposed. Has the neighboring property been approached again to see about acquiring an easement? Provide a document showing a recent request to move the drainage easement east onto their property from the neighboring property, either approving or rejecting the movement of the easement onto their property. If that is not an option then we can go forward as discussed with a "floating" slab and encased storm drain pipe. I would like to see the plans for the slab and pier locations. The portion of pipe to be encased would need to be HDPE, not concrete. There should be no additional bearing pressures on the storm drain pipe other than backfill. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp • Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. • A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. • Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review GENERAL COMMENTS: No comments based on submitted information. Ordinance No. 480-474c General Informational Comments • Staff strongly recommends contacting Jerod Potts in the Planning and Development Services Department to schedule a SPIN meeting. Jerod can be contacted by phone at (817) 748-8195 or by e-mail at ipottsci.southlake.tx.us. For more information about SPIN and the SPIN process please go to SouthlakeSPlN.org. • Written permission from adjacent property owners is required prior to the construction of the 4 additional parking spaces. • No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan, including monument signs. A separate permit is required prior to construction of any signs. • All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. • All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. It appears that this property lies within the 75 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. • The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. • In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. • The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. • Stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. The use of synthetic products (e.g., EIFS — exterior insulation and finish systems, hardy plank, or Ordinance No. 480-474c other materials) shall not be considered as masonry material. (As amended by Ordinance 480-PPP) Mechanical Equipment Screening:All buildings must be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite dishes shall be visible from any rights-of-way as defined in Section 43.19.d. This shall include equipment on the roof, on the ground or otherwise attached to the building or located on the site. Rooftop mechanical equipment and / or other rooftop appurtenance screening shall be accomplished by either the construction of 1) the roof systems described in subparagraph (b) above or 2) an architectural feature which is integral to the building's design and ensures that such equipment is not visible from ROW as defined in Section 43.19.d.. The fencing of or enclosure of individual mechanical units shall not be permitted except as described above. * Denotes Informational Comment Ordinance No.480-474c SIP-1 USE AND REGULATION DOCUMENT Zoning Change Application SP-1 with C-2 Uses limited to Local Retail Commercial PIE ILK A«RIES JEWELERS ZA17-103 S-P-1 REGULATIONS PERMITTED USES_-L DETELOPIIEATREG1 L4IIOYS: We are proposing the following Permitted Uses and Development Regulations for the property,as follows: Permitted Uses: This property shall be limited to the permitted uses found in the-C Local Retail Commercial District,as described in Section 21 of the Zoning Ordinance of The City of South lake.Texas as amended.with the following exceptions to allowed uses: 1.Limited to Local Retail DET ELOPME\T REG£Z4TIO1:S: This property ehall be subject to the normal development regulations contained within the respective Land Use Distncts regulating Permitted Uses above,and all other applicable regulations.with the following exceptions: 1.The Side yard setback on the eastside only shall be zero(0')feet. 2.The maxims impervious coverage shall be 74.9%. 'o Allowed=per SP1 regulation) 3.The parking requirement shall be one(1)space for every 325 square feet of total building area_for all uses. Current parking requirement is 39 spaces_ Proposed parking is 32 spaces plus 4 offsite spaces immediately adjacent to die building for a total of 36. Storage space is 2,941 which requires 3 parking spaces but the storage space will not require additional people. In addition.Georgetown Park has been developed with continuous connected drives to allow for the potential of shared parking. 4.No loading space will be required Storage space is 2..941 which when deducted from the total square footage reduces the square footage to under 10,000 s.L f:4RLIxcES: 1. Landscape requirements shall be as currently exists in this fully landcraped lot with the additional landscaping depicted in the proposed Landscape Plan_ The lot as it exists currently is fully landscaped and will further enhance the landscaping in the areas depicted on the Landscape Plan. Further.the Owner intends to utilize the existing trees identified to be removed and replant at other locations available within the site. The existing trees that ate proposed to be altered for the building and parking additions are a istmg landscaping that was installed with the original development The original Site Plan was approved in 1998 and the landscaping is not required to be maintained in perpetuity. No Tree Conservation Plan is required or has been provided The existing trees to remain shall be protected from damage during the building renovation as per city ordinance. tree protection plan has been provided. A new colored landscape and tee protection plan have been provided as noted in the site plan review summary. Also included are colored building elevations with dimensions and building articulations. Ordinance 480-671b (ZA18-0019): City Council motion: August 7, 2018: Approved (6-0) at 2nd Reading, subject to the Staff Report dated July 31 , 2018, and Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 1, 2108: and granting the following variance request: The applicant has requested a variance to the Landscape Ordinance 544-B, to allow the landscape requirements for the existing fully landscaped lot with the additional landscaping, as depicted in the proposed Landscape Plan; also noting, the applicant will remove six trees on the eastern portion of the site to allow for the construction per the plan. Ordinance No. 480-474c The applicant will attempt to transplant the existing two live oaks and three elm trees onsite, as indicated tonight. The Bradford Pear that will be removed with the construction will be replaced with a new tree. If the existing trees cannot be transplanted or don't survive transplanting, new trees consisting of elms or live oaks will be planted. All new trees will be planted with a minimum 3" caliper. Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated 6-1-2018 Planning Review No Comments Tree Conservation/Landscape Review TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. Eight (8) existing landscape trees that qualify as protected trees are proposed to be removed. Please provide the existing tree cover preservation calculations on the Tree Conservation Plan. Information required for Tree Conservation Plan: i. Identification of Critical Environmental Features of the site: A. All individually protected trees B. Existing streams, drainage creeks, ponds, and other water bodies (if any) ii.Tree Survey or alternative to a tree survey iii. 2-foot contour map of the site iv. Protected trees within the tree preservation area including tree size and type v.Critical Root Zones of groups of trees vi. Critical Root Zones for individual trees required for site plans only vii. Boundaries of any tree preservation areas as identified in the ERP Map viii. Identification of areas of environmental constraints not suitable for development ix. Identification of areas of minimal environmental constraints that are suitable for development x.Areas of encroachment into Critical Environmental Features identified on the site xi. Clear delineation, for each protected tree, of whether the tree will be preserved after the proposed development is constructed, altered due to proposed improvements, or could potentially be saved based upon site specific conditions xii. Stream/Creek buffers, if any xiii. Detailed site plan of all proposed improvements. (All proposed improvements shall be required to be shown only at the site plan stage for all development. Preliminary plats shall, however, show building setbacks and general location of buildings and infrastructure.) xiv.Setbacks, building lines, and buffer yards xv. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of those persons or entities who own the property and those persons or entities filing the application Ordinance No. 480-474c xvi. Such additional information as the Administrative Official may reasonably require given the particular characteristics of the property Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the the entire site existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% —20% 70% 20.1 —40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man- made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant Ordinance No. 480-474c to this Ordinance. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. The proposed additional building square footage exceeds 30% the existing building square footage and the property is proposed to be rezoned. All interior landscape and bufferyard requirements are required to be met. Please provide a landscape plan which encompasses the entire property and shows interior landscaping and bufferyards. Interior Landscape Requirement: INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIREMENTS: The amount of landscape area required on the interior of the lot (excludes bufferyards) shall be based on the square footage of the proposed buildings. The square footage of the building for the purposes of this ordinance will be the square footage of the first floor or the square footage of the largest floor, whichever is greater. Bufferyard Requirement: CHANGES IN ZONING: Any request for changes in zoning to any district other than agricultural or single family residential districts shall require that all required bufferyards and associated irrigation be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the proposed use. New construction which increases the square footage of the existing building by thirty percent (30%) or greater or which exceeds 5000 square feet shall be required to meet the bufferyard requirements. 2. More existing landscaping is proposed to be removed than replaced. Since the interior landscape and bufferyard regulations are required to be met, all existing landscape on the lot must be shown. There may be enough existing landscaping on the site to meet the requirements but without it shown to be provided for it cannot be quantified. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review GENERAL COMMENTS: This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. Ordinance No. 480-474c * The existing 24" storm drain pipe that runs within an existing drainage easement will be rerouted to the east through the existing common access, drainage and utility easement for the Georgetown Park addition. The construction of the east one-story addition will require the relocation of the existing electrical transformer to south of the proposed addition. If relocation of the storm drain pipe is found to be unfeasible, an alternate plan will be needed, subject to Public Works Engineering review and approval. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet, if applicable. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. • Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. • Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. • Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. • Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesiqn.asp • Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. • A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. Ordinance No. 480-474c • Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department GENERAL COMMENTS: No comments based on submitted information. General Informational Comments • No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan, including monument signs. A separate permit is required prior to construction of any signs. • All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. • All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. • Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. • It appears that this property lies within the 75 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. • The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. • Stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. The use of synthetic products (e.g., EIFS — exterior insulation and finish systems, hardy plank, or other materials) shall not be considered as masonry material. (As amended by Ordinance 480-PPP) Mechanical Equipment Screening: All buildings must be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite dishes shall be visible from any rights-of-way as defined in Section 43.19.d. This shall include equipment on the roof, on the ground or otherwise attached to the building or located on the site. Rooftop mechanical equipment and / or other rooftop appurtenance screening shall be accomplished by either the construction of 1) the roof systems described in subparagraph (b) above or 2) an Ordinance No.480-474c architectural feature which is integral to the building's design and ensures that such equipment is not visible from ROW as defined in Section 43.19.d.. The fencing of or enclosure of individual mechanical units shall not be permitted except as described above. '' Denotes Informational Comment SITE PLAN SUBIIITT L n ARRATiVE Z417-103 2525 E. Southlake Blvd. SP-1 USE AND REGULATION DOCUMENT Zoning Change Application SP-1 with C-2 Uses limited to Local Retail Commercial For 2525 E.Southlake Boulevard.we are requesting SP-1 Zoning with C-2 uses limited to Local Retail Commercial use. The property is an existing site and building that was developed as part of the Georgetown Park Development. Since then,the site was subdivided and lots were sold individually. As such we are requesting for a zero lot building line at the eastern side of the property.We also ask for an increase of impervious coverage as indicated on the Site Data Summary Chart. The property owner.International NBC.Inc.(Pieter A.ndries Hye)intends to add a secure entry-. secure loading and unloading and secure VIP Entry on the east side. The existing 24-storm drain pipe that rums within the existing 10' drainage easement will be rerouted to the east underneath the existing shared access drive for the overall development property. This access drive is designated as a common access and utility easement for the Georgetown Park addition. The construction of the east side addition will require the relocation of the misting electrical transformer on the site. The main level of the proposed two story addition at the southwest corner will consist of an expansion of the existing jewelers shop. The second level of the two story addition will accommodate the onsite 2417 surveillance staff The existing building is brick and stucco with fabric awning at the north side of the building. The proposed 2 story addition and east side addition will be constructed using the: ,nP materials in keeping with the same design of the existing building_ Proposed are fabric awnings to match existing awnings at the north side of the east side addition and at the northwest tower as indicated on the colored elevations. Due to the proposed building additions.the imperious coverage exceeds the allowed impervious coverage under the current C-2 zoning by 4.9%. Part of the SP-1 request is to allow for this greater impervious coverage percentage. Based on current parking requirements per building square footage,the number of parking spaces required is 39. The number of parting spaces to be provided is 32. As the site is existing,no additional area is available to provide new parking spaces with the placement of the building additions and existing trees. An attempt was made to provide 4 new additional off-site parking spaces just to the east of the new east building addition. After several discussions with the adjacent property owner_they declined to allow any development on their property. As part of the SP-1 zon;ng_we are requesting the 32 parking spaces be acceptable instead of 39 spaces_ Only a small area of the site will become a new landscaped area. Landscaping will be provided to comply with the Landscape Ordinance No. 544-B as much in this new area in a manner consistent with the existing landscaping and shall consist of shrubs,ornamental grasses. ground cover.seasonal color,or a combination of these plant materials. The existing trees on the property to be removed to allow for the new building additions will be relocated to new locations on the site. The existing trees on the property to remain will be pruned_ Ordinance No. 480-474c SP-11 USE AND REGULATION DOCUMENT Zoning Change Application SP-1 with C-2 Uses limited to Local Retail Commercial PIETER -DRIES JEWELERS ZA17-103 S-P-1 REGULATIONS PERMITTED USES_L\D DET ELOP_1tENT REGI:L4TIONS: We are proposing the following Permitted Uses and Development Regulations for the property,as follows: Permitted ties: This property shall be limited to the permitted uses found in the"C-2"Local Retail Commercial District,as described in Section 21 of the Zoning Ordinance of The City of Southlake_Texas as amended,with the following exceptions to allowed uses: 1.Limited to Local Retail DET ELOPMENT REGI L4I7ONS: This property shall be subject to the normal development regulations contained within the respective Land Use Districts regulating Permitted Uses above,and all other applicable regulations.with the following exceptions: 1.The Side yard setback on the eastside only shall be zero(0')feet. 2.The maximum impervious coverage shall be 74.9%.(%Allowed=per SPI regulation) 3. The parking requirement shall be one(1)space for every 276 square feet of total building area,for all uses. Current parking requirement is 39 paces. Proposed parking is 32 spaces. Storage space is 2,941 which requires 3 parking spaces,but the storage space will not require additional people. In addition,Georgetown Park has been developed with continuous connected drives to allow for the potential of shared parking. 4.No loading pace will be required. Storage space is 2,941 which when deducted from the total square footage reduces the square footage to under 10,000 s.f T:4RL 1 CES: 1_ Landscape requirements shall be as currently exists in this fully landscaped lot with the additional landscaping depicted in the proposed Landscape Plan. The lot as it exists currently is fully landtaped and will further enhance the landscaping in the areas depicted on the Landscape Plan_ Further,the Owner intends to utili7P the existing trees identified to be removed and replant at other locations available within the site. The existing trees that are proposed to be altered for the building and parking additions are existing landscaping that was installed with the original development. The original Site Plan was approved in 1998 and the landscaping is not required to be maintained in perpetuity. No Tree Conservation Plan is required or has been provided. The existing trees to remain shall be protected from damage during the building renovation as per city ordinance. A tree protection plan has been provided. A colored landscape and tree protection plan have been provided. Also included are colored building elevations with dimensions and building articulations. Ordinance No. 480-671c (ZA21-0045): City Council motion: September 7, 2021; Approved (7-0) subject to the Staff Report dated August 31, 2021; and Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated July 30, 2021; noting we are approving the addition as shown. Ordinance No. 480-474c Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated July 30, 2021 Planning Review 1. The site is parked at a fixed 32 spaces per the net floor area regardless or the required parking for the site. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: • The proposed addition is less than 5,000 square feet, and less than 30% of the existing building footprint. New construction intended to increase the square footage by less than 30% of the existing building or less than 5,000 square feet shall be required to meet the requirements herein only as it pertains to the square footage of the new construction. There are only three (3) additional shrubs required for the 180 square foot addition. Any existing interior landscaping altered by the construction will also need to be replaced. • The three (3) required shrubs, and twenty-eight (28) additional shrubs to replace the shrubs removed for the building addition are proposed to be planted on the southeast corner of the building. • Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Fire Department Review GENERAL COMMENTS: Since the building is equipped with an automatic fire protection system, proper sprinkler system coverage must be continued throughout the building. Since less than 20 sprinkler heads will be added or relocated for the new addition, no plans are required. Call the Fire Marshal's Office for an inspection once the work is completed at 817-748-8233. Since the building is already equipped with audible/visual fire alarm devices, coverage must be continued throughout the occupancy to maintain compliance throughout the structure. Add fire alarm devices as required for the new addition and call for a fire alarm test once installed. Ensure all access control devices are approved and inspected by the Southlake Fire Department before activating the devices (Magnetic Locks, Delayed Egress Control Devices) (Also, ensure all other locking or latching devices are removed from those doors). General Informational Comments No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. • All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Ordinance No.480-474c • All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. • All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. • It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. • Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. • The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. • Denotes Informational Comment Ordinance No.480-474c SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL N_ iR4TI\T 2525 E.Southlake Blvd. SP-1 USE AND REGULATION DOC L\ff NT Zoning Change Application SP-1 with C-2 Uses limited to Local Retail Commercial For 2525 E.Southlake Boulevard.we are requesting SP-1 Inning with C-2 uses limited to Local Retail Commercial use. The property is an existing site and building that was developed as part of the Georgetown Park Development_ Since then.the site was subdivided and lots were sold individvmitly_ An increase of impervious coverage as indicated on the Site Data Sivnrnar Chart is requested as part of the application The property owner.International MBC,Inc.(Pieter Andries Hye)intends to add a small addition to the existing building an the ground floor of the building that faces north. Its use is intended fora floor area to be used for security surveillance staff to be stationed during business hours. The existing building is brick and stucco with fabric awning at the north side of the building. The proposed 1 story addition will be constructed w.mu the same materials in keeping with the same design of the existing building. Due to the proposed building additions.the imperious coverage exceeds the allowed impervious coverage under the current C-2 zoning by 5.5%. Part of the SP-1 request is to allow for this greater impervious coverage percentage. Based on the existing parking requirements per building square footage.the number of parking spaces required is 39. The proposed new addition requires the increase of 1 parking space.for a total of 40 spaces. The number of parking spaces to be provided is 32. As the site is existing,no additional area is available to provide new paring spaces_ As part of the SP-1 zoning.,we are requesting the 32 parldng spaces be acceptable instead of 40 spaces. No grading plans are provided with this submittal. The location of the new building addition will not require any change to any existing grading. No utility work(water,sewer or drainage)is provided with this submittal.Na utility work will be required for the new building addition. A waiver for the Traffic Impact Analysis is requested. Only 198 squre feet of building space is being added to an existing retail jewelry shop. There will not be any additional parking or rhanges to existing driveways. No survey is provided with this submittal. Site plan drawing is accurate and based on a site survey conducted for the previous site plan submittal for this site to add other building additions. City Case number ZA18-0019.. No Pedestrian Access Plan is provided with this submittaL All sidewalks are existing. No sidewalks are to be added. I Aivdscaping will be provided to comply with the Landscape Ordinance No. 544-B throughout the existing site in a manner consistent with the existing landscaping and shall consist of shrubs,ornamental grasses.ground cower, seasonal color,or a combination of these plant materials. All existing frees on the site chall remain No trees will b required to be removed for the proposed addition_ Ordinance No. 480-474c PIETER NDRIES JEWELERS ZA21-0045 S-P-1 REGULATIONS PERMITTED USES AM)DET FLOPIIENT REGUL4TIONS: We are proposing the following Permitted Uses and Development Regulations for the property, as follows: Permitted Uses: This property shall be limited to the permitted uses found in the'C-2"Local Retail Commercial District. as described in Section 21 of the Zoning Ordinance of The City of Southlake.Texas as amended.with the following exceptions to allowed uses: 1.Limited to Local Retail DET E'LOPMI TREGLL.IIION.S: This property shall be subject to the normal development regulations contained within the respective Land Use Districts regulating Permitted Uses above. and all other applicable regulations.with the following exceptions: 2.The maximum impervious coverage shall be 75.5%. (%Allowed=per SP1 regulation) 3. The parking requirement shall be one (1)space for every 274 square feet of total building area.for all uses. The one(1)space for every 274 square feet is less than the one(1/space for every 276 square feet of total building area as approved in the City Case Number Z418-0019. Proposed building addition puts parking requirement at 40 spaces, one more than the 39 spaces required in the previously approved City Case Number Z418-0019. Proposed parking is 32 spaces(which is the current number of existing spaces and the number of spaces approved in the City Case Number Z413-0019)_ In addition, Georgetown Park has been developed with continuous connected drives to allow for the potential of shared parking. 4.No loading space will be required. Storage space is 2,941 which when deducted from the total square footage reduces the square footage to under 10,000 s f T: RL INCES: 1. Landscape requirements shall be as currently exists in this fully landscaped lot with any additional landscaping depicted in the proposed Landscape Plan. The lot as it exists currently is fully landscaped. All existing trees shall remain_ No trees shall be removed due to the construction of the building addition. The original Site Plan was approved in 1998 and the landscaping is not required to be maintained in perpetuity_ The existing trees to remain shall be protected from damage during the building renovation as per city ordinance. A colored landscape and tree protection plan have been provided. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other ap sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases Ordinance No. 480-474c and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land Ordinance No. 480-474c described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Ordinance No. 480-474c SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 17th day of August 2021. m, R$ ii: ````\�o\.. LAKF �T.. ATTEST: .• '•;�f`.. CITY SE RETA Y•� ? //1filliiii *0 * ``‘�`. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 7th day of September 2021. r M YO � F E TF�+ ATTEST: 'o: ' `� �; w! _ • CITY 1110 R' ' y... 4.:, t"" In110 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 1 )7 ' CITY ATTORNEY DATE: c11-74 1 2i ADOPTED: ` V1 12 i EFFECTIVE: 41 u1-74 Ordinance No. 480-474c EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2525 E. Southlake Blvd. Lot 3-R-1, Block 1, of Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas as shown on the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. WHEREAS International MBC, Inc. is the owner of a 0.8917 acre tract of land recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, situated in Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING, at a 5/8" iron rod found in the south line of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) at the northeast corner of Lot 1-R-1, Block 1, GEORGETOWN PARK according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. THENCE, South 70 degrees, 47 minutes, 12 seconds East a distance of 187.83 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found in the northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, GEORGETOWN PARK, according to the plate thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4216, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE, South 00 degrees, 01 minutes, 38 seconds West a distance of 188.13 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found in the northeast corner of Lot 3-R-2, Block 1, GEORGETOWN PARK; THENCE, North 89 degrees, 59 minutes, 40 seconds west a distance of 177.31 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found in the northwest corner of Lot 3-R-2, Block1, GEORGETOWN PARK; THENCE, South 00 degrees, 00 minutes, 20 seconds West a distance of 249.93 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING, 38,842 square feet or 0.8917 acres of land, more or less. Ordinance No.480-474c 0 a Cu n rD Z � o IC a.oKa a+.. a A per.nma221 `u0at`°ctm' �.� CO aas.o qi, O J .a..e.amm , Kosuaamg n ac.s.a�rn _ I 3pV \\ s w edr.mararbet �•.•.. . �RQej souC fVgRo 6 I mas e.l. _��\�. 0 �� 'Tom• • 1014101221 �� YM -_. .r... .•:;:•;:;.•,•, _ AJCpu{{ .}tya. .Y I/ Al,::..�" ]yam ' ♦..�.�4 �' . �, ,, et , ...maw.abu[ [al-rs1SAM ma RIME k .eIK-lair au-. 0111252v . ur _f iv. UV tau p ., ; a l' �Jl� r n CD co ono CO .®[Mif•! 0•`� 22st le Sr 1 ,. , :::/�� V O Mee r... .o.,a.c awmaa .QK nn wkJ.) w e o- / .I' 1 " a) �• r. mne a�sm .pm w�i n.. w � � M l P � IO arow com Y[ .m a.lsei .w.-.nP( OM or •�i�� '`T•� 1 b 4 �{ W 2221 -.0.m 152�. rv.e 7221 wl .1. �t &t.�i"� r.. "v ,� 1 �/�o� � S�i°cuK.n.a ; p}y3( Yuu atn raK om.r ..v 241 12 � ��"" • "# �• -.� r > m .�me ; �g "., y Ir " 3S• L m Y4f^ 01 �' .,s eo...wvaw. Yuo2.00 4 al. WI rQ, ^• r F.aq'-A ,' D - t 0 s•u e o u.r .. ;s . awl sn r ! Z �j ZZ C.11 .K.K ,grim s..:WNW OWN INIMMINCICIM a \\ a P W 4 r .�`.b" i ;7: :' // o. E21�if80eb- �' \ �j i.� ,:. 1 °`Slfb:owix:4 4`"& � ':1t� ► �%Via,° Mk MMHGwuars • IA: . a 1 r I or accroo ses w24 a.rn 00 ZA14-059 t..W : I= la0.MIL CW1.UCI.I ...»... is - 01 PROPOSED SITE PLAN M� SP-PLAN SCAM VIV a PO Landscape Plan INNIMINrA0211/1e.1 cc ii ........�. .�rr1.1 1 S........,,/ 0 • sow ■aneo.+..".up.Rl ail1en�r 1•,Q=>.w w.s LVO "'1C 1 I I iirr $ 4aAt IP At - sourw IAk£ B r rr,Q.4 0 woU�V4 as ' ,•at,.iiiiN 467.333,,,,0. vilil ,. , - ..- .imlio,.LAI; ,x vy ----_,_ i _ it . r ,./._/"- , -:-. .... . - -- • _ if -.4. .g•-• _ .,.. . , _ _ ik�: �, ` 54 $W--,-. k‘k I 1 0/ L. ;,� I 44/ . . LOT 4-R-1,BLOCK 1 1 • J` -x _ 1� 4EOR�GETOMI PAfOC b - . CA A.SL 7350 � .'• .t.,.' P.LT C.T. 4 ; LUA COMMERCIAL OFRC7AL r 0.8917 ACR `1 \ ,, �3,\ ,,:;; 1 1 • i0lMFlU1C ,�\ l I �'� '' 1P• Gs,A,L M71 t`. .> 1 •AL t:. ►ATG7 1-rtt1 ,STORY 1�910R7 175/S0JT 1 A l{M ti :q,, ` ` 2\,.\` \ 1 \ t,':r;: 1 u:ps trillI ..\ . ___ L , ____. LOT 3-R-2.■M 1 O '! 10 10 1 too TREE PROTECTION/ "CAB A. 'PARK 44711 0 01 LANDSCAPE PLAN T. LUC.RETAIL�OORMERCIAL TRUE NORM SCALE: 1/16'=1'-0" L Ordinance No. 480-474c Building Elevations +;. Pieter Andries • �' kwelers I \ ""m �..... _E . . . ..a.� +r -- .°°. 01 NORTH ELEVATION -PROPOSED SCALE:1/8'=1'-0' r — _ illi■■�■ a vim ■■ . . It... `� I • — I— I — 1J us • �� .�a. El I MN 1 `' Illk _ BA ‘iif -, In'. 11111 Eia Aiwormi—mmiriiii....di 02 SOUTH ELEVATION -PROPOSED SCALE:1/8'=1'-0" - --- Ordinance No.480-474c nawozEo 1 srcxr wanON r.0.w•_ r.o.w. r.ar. MO.PROMO ONLY raw 1. M NO GLASS ___._.. _... _ raw 1 1 :_k • Yo I ___) 6� -p rtcoowAc , , , , 1 • i i E',,„ ri- ._] ice.- I i ,J Lt- kiAlco rnsmc +wwan ro sum N0 mOPOSED Parr COCHIw<L Lio•_0.00,0•pw 0 1 EAST ELEVATION — PROPOSED SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" F-.. ,.. _ pROVOSED 1 STORY AMMON . iA -411114kill r.7. 0 w.0. t.ar 74 erD.w CV u.-D. -- --- rD wry EnSriip bIG II R ; —.—-- ._ Y-T EAST.i.BNiCJ "-- �n AWING `[r OGOMS I al r _ as.0 AN t 6'1 3/6' y �5'6 02 WEST ELEVATION — PROPOSED SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0" Ordinance No. 480-474c SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ZA14-059 PROJECT NAME: Pieter Andries Jeweler SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 8 MEETING DATE: March 25, 2014; 6:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Nine (9) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Randy Robbins and 4 others • APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Robert Garza, RPGA Architects, 817-332-9477 Email: robgarza@rpgaarchitects.com • STAFF PRESENT: Patty Moos, Planner I and Jerod Potts, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Patty Moos, Planner I: (817)748-8269 or pmoosci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation • The property is located at 2525 E. Southlake Boulevard. Project Details: • Project is an expansion to the existing building due to professional burglary • Addition in southwest corner is a two story shop with security overlook • East addition is a porte cochere for client security • Green space and offsite parking on the adjacent property, parking construction paid by adjacent property owner and landscaping paid by Pieter Andries Jeweler • Architecture and articulation to match the existing building Ordinance No.480-474c The plan presented at SPIN: ,/i'llif-4114111104 4,7 ' .,:,-\ irit_, . --E-'-'. Al • --- • 01 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 6UlL IP 6•.E.O. Pieter Andries Jeweler Site Plan Li -- 2 • L 4 `m,,, — r Z. lgKf „,9.00, ,,,,,,„ p--. ....„„. :.:.....-..c.:..... ....,,.,,, ,,,,,it 4L1ij ! — I.'',..o.8917 ADRE Mr/IS zag slaw er1,,i / i i, LJ TREE PROTECTION/ O )1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ,,,,..,,ro.ow. SCALE 1/16'•1'V Ordinance No.480-474c Landscape Plan Building Elevations toode.."."1"L.0001111111.1111111.1111.111111111111111 01 NORTH ELEVATION-PROPOSED SCALE Lad0 • • • 02 SOUTH ELEVATION-PROPOSED Far- Li _L, _ L ------------------------- 01 EAST ELEVATION-PROPOSED SCALE:Sir-i•.p 02 WEST ELEVATION-PROPOSED Ordinance No. 480-474c QUESTIONS / CONCERNS • What are the site lines and accessibility to the site? The security force is off duty police officers and the parking will benefit both properties. • What about the neighbors and a two story building and their privacy? This is a commercial property with no residential adjacency. • Is the new parking pavement permeable? This could be considered. • Is the exterior façade consistent with the existing facility? Yes. Meeting presentation ended at 6:40 pm SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives.The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes;rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials,City staff,and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Ordinance No. 480-474c Ordinance No. 480-474a (ZA17-103) Site Plan more f�. � PROWS — VONIVUID I • `gymY,yt 8 1 Q �.1 IV7-I5..-.i._,l"-':S'l_fffiH.1;_4-.r,..a'.Y,.'''.:,4"..k,.E„...._,.,MNia-.,...:,.'.,":_;s,'4.-,,,,_,_,.'T,sA.:._-i..-,=1,,4S.._A-.,—.'-4-i7.'._.-4:..-` i r }p, ..,.,•.72 41:—'1q0147..t8..:.:;5.'*.:1.:.'...:.11.E:141'.i7t'4r,,:%,-,•:..:•,.--..,*-..•:.::.::":r‘.,4i Atf.1'0',1,'*; ...--',,l,.7t.+y-,r-.--.-,,'ic 47. / 6a..aI..C ` }llL ) ) L f .., `s}.�� w-ti :ate.,..,:.; 's ��,� �- 0ati '.^YX7 0 ' , I . qy 4 bye! , m ' 4 ,,,. 4 i1 iii- ._- - �..�. ® /ice / ,4-:*,,.:,•-•,' '54. --:,:-.l-WW-,....--.• c 4 CI,.' ' r- 0 ..„. ilZ_ la �,.,� ZAI7-103 01• PROPOSED SHE PLAN I ~ = scut Ens.rs .. 2. SP-PLAN FREE P1111K VA1ION: .,, ;;M .® :, -'"� Imo---- s -� =�-. �;' CJ r wa -• €1a1 E : - , 1 _ i m "--,=3 _4 MEM • 1.• • MI A01KLT10M NOB � 4'V4,0 Q, ' . tee.,x i. a. " I -l l' 08917ACRE 1 8 eTisarvrwnnwoErwo f. TWOUROM ._E���.�..�.y.��........_-,.- _ S ill J- 41 _ ,." g*Tx,, 4 mom- TREE PROTECTION/ A}. i i�-+ - --C T U17-103 fttatti w1M•'NPF' '1.$192-• '" 01 LANDSCAPE PLAN ,,,n..r.l. i.,.., .a.o. 1WMi1L11$•110TECIgN RNUNG x�uE:�;,a•-,•-v SP-L PLAN Ordinance No. 480-474c Building Elevations S� : ► , ho Q=a If a 01 NORTH ELEVATION-PROPOSED II; scuE:vr.ia 8 n' �- -::; .... ; .l nu=. yin `_� G 13: __. 1111 � _J 1/ Aig111t1 I, z 111! uen €€ IIil N s.. d ZAI7-103 02 SOUTH ELEVATION-PROPOSED — u�i�. 5.SP-ELEV.1 _ Ili fill i EIII Hui II IIII _yef i sr n I Loi000...III°°111" a 1 1 01 EAST ELEVATION-PROPOSED - 1 SCALE 1/B'.I'0' C I 1 Eitibb,_ _ ....._ l, ., _ ili� IL I ® 5 0 ZA17-103 02 WEST ELEVATION-PROPOSED scuE I/0..,•sr ,g SP-ELEV.2 Ordinance No. 480-474c 0 a n ...AYY. fD f a,.��.0 .e. ..�.�...,�.o«. a Z 747111110,4016 M.....Y.•L.. am.m+a o•w 0 1ma a Win ® .n v ...'91.;.:..a,ni o '"'-'.-, 'j 4 ,,4ryyQu, .- r.a� O M YYMn@i oMO xaa w/9 w, m.is.i. aDmR1 3.3 K a un im K 'Y Rti MY s WI ly 4CD w�A ortrc I MA KM 17 m 4. MC asp VON I= SO:* m tEl ......... J MAW;17R. Mk IF UM !m W O RM p...—��� .Rif Ant.•fr! __ MAC all MI f On -�� '+4 y VICINITY MAP Mk .7v US \ Sot//y NO SCALE nY.w......orar 7 "41)i e, d mug MHO 1.'::1 � SYMIO UN-ON rce3.11f Y 1., 1 41 .• nic .Lit uT.x u m.mx •� .,yy yw Y; n tuo n,p ::;1?'.. ` L 1 Y,11Y M+.4 tt:a0 SO 1441.1.s a i!vM �• !1 p>• a "-. ,:, Q J I 0 o.11R V. �ea airi�n sil �ff ..., � `` p � ?. 4miiii +NaYx I x0114L vs m "�� w .3., Uel f w v SYf l MtYF.w,watts ro iw Cam n MO K•e s.mr, !::1;•!`.;Y1 1.„Ny`)021 4yy •• attbs 7'. . •�.I' e ca uu:.v. t74° .. I w«Huron int„+ow lituS+b@ Y 11 FA,,;, .{��FQ/.ice L, S`C' 9s.' I © W I o xxxl3 Ma KA .m r xm r ! '•.Y S 13'••.•. 03%);,$¢��¢p,, "�' 7 F /� • me®nmi tlPR�4 1p.-3of .al-3>or - "A/'ft]':�' :) [ li ft ,\! 'e- _ EC'a II —. vary-uvf SAW-uPI / : 7K:r.�t CO xam:wls m-uo�+.f,e svL-uwms _�' / i\! ^+ ', > : . \ fD Y 1 :• m..fm-7 =XII,.D-1 ' ' ' RAN Rs m11Y1¢ ifm on aim= a fm— \\ J pY9,n. .mrs.m ef.m sa =OM MU IMO en 4147�4 '$\\�\\\\ /`�( - ao mo•v rwu 3 = 0- w MIfo sfmw wl MO VMB f.: ..:t11IFø\a jy '"�I , LOg1.fIo.1' \\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \+ \% ''' C ;! ac ccxrnw smmr a,a• !nr▪ .1111710410, al,.• WAS ewa `�e q,.a,\�p:�\�\\\\torti,, \\\\\ \\\ / I^gC4" i J 03 Lup 1EiIY CtYy[.gAL i7j%%\ \\ \ \ 1I Mgt ��\% IN O�zk{a...AVroY.rRn�.wpoY. o ' �% \\\ \ \� i/; _ o�] (G 4 \\\\\\\\\ Fr °�' , EAR snP R�mM[I exam as •Fw.Y i. /!.1 ') : ;: rA / R� MgOAl/0111 $,.. ...fig:.x.,..'l,nn _ ... .... [..- 1°r. s !° Q '= PA7.47. ZA18-00 r n ••�� LM .UD.KM 01.6K1M ...vv. ..v -• 11... " "• 01 PROPOSED SITE PLAN M SP-PLAN -__ SCALE:1/16.m 1'0 .�'.. 0 1 0_ 0 Iv 7 a) TREE PRESERVATION: _ma_ Zr non.memo am am ocmonons so.nano on wane ........o.so y2py wa a M1r. b, n..a/ rtwu 1LL a tw cr '."' o " .11 .e CLL rrr6/ ',T. ... ._.__. �..r.. ..� '40'^c 4p°.t .11 .. .o area .. rW orsn �. I 1 tom..,T1 +,, .� ,m.0 IV SW sr ................. f In no W man1 I .0 'f cn An K .A Ma on f w On r r._ W CV not t Xs no 'f ZZ+s' ... K 11. sw r N. .ti f s r r - v-_ f w On r SOU TN( Ery iVtat .. w r . r GENERAL TREE PROTECTION NOTES . _ r 0c p QOCFVgR� 1 • r 1 A„...ocs mu.nom‘roc.m. •tillit";:krt' \ITO''%4L.4)-aft-''''''..o.,... 0 E • 3 nen An.lcori wa Loc.war.0,cm...T7.1..▪05.Goy In.,,tit cr•onocroa.noc.op a I ' V..="..11.1°.rlf.g4T%W.J....==r`.....4.1.r.r...ar.:41 Al:-1.T.1' -' -1-/i w--,51•1 lib' •$ -___,_ NNW .a:: ......._.. .,_. .�4 v_ . i • --- 41liki- :,: n r: Ior CD r Co i , if \ 101.11-1,ROM 1 O ^ee !"' 1 .IN .,`\\.M...A\}Cte. CAB.A Sl.»50 lL OO O 1;:,i CI 7 1 ..U.O.BEtAt CO.rN... Q W m •l.�\-t '�m DL _ I0.8917ACRE 1. �` L}g l[1' 1Lt"1I4�PR4 L'IF�FR�18@iP Si'tY r:l I WIM4BwRt m ✓.S� TYPICAL BARK4 PROTECTION M&......................°....... CEOPICE10011 PAIR 1 1 ��RBAO�M N g~g CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA P.0.1.G1 II �wmr. s / Z <.z LC0 r:ILL CQ.rAQAI .m1ir uB U.�' a.N C. V o< --4, ...,..-,,,,oit,y 1 '''' ''',10 l'f •-,.." I1 ICI 1 = t/tiY,I!l V i lACRi' ni iS Z' 11111101111311111111100 .Or YB-2 HOCK. p ZJ'�1 V'VV18 0 .. TREE PROTECTION/ UMW... t«6 - _ 410 Arlant .r es•° to N - 01 LANDSCAPE PLAN i.o.NCI.Co..l1�.0..4 T 'C WITH $P-�L PLAN TYPICAL TREE PROTECTION FENCING SCALE 1/16•-I'-0' PI ANS MUM Building Elevations _— ETEE itager- m , .1 ii, il. , . \Ill.°111".4110. 1 111"."711."1111.1' 0 a 01 NORTH ELEVATION-PROPOSED Q•I .._A iijul vu J < EV1 - a ¢ � - In . t1 ; Z .liMiniiill " fl ZA17-103 02 SOUTH ELEVATION-PROPOSED sc..,sr-i-a L SP-ELEV.1 l ,,,,A. I U ii'ii - � 5 _.: iioi iiii -E _ - — L.......„0,„ a ° 01 EAST ELEVATION-PROPOSED SCALE.IN.1'-0• ° I II 411-ti , -V 3 gl MEMO < aR .. IIII E §:i 91ri. _k _ 311 i - ii-_ Ell€ g ZA17-103 02 WEST ELEVATION-PROPOSED -- SCALE.lir-i-a g SP-ELEV.2 Ordinance No. 480-474c 0 _a a) D libel wan Kama— ruat�mv.n ` arItYML1 a.NLa,oN.. ta0a.t+./.Q I£� �� .o�aYaY .•..Ra..N .. z rt.rN.As1Nal _ a.a.9itrm s. - eo�r>aaUTM at....q..... •�--�• — O ,errata.DA MO MN s.�aa-.....�.s a.. ��~ .............7 _.+. run>•.nva ••••••{ MD.ar kW r Art err 666,44i„.... • nn.w - -..°, Vat na1 uw O. 17AV DMA OM II AU 0 t N1CtC .INa Ra la AI , ta. ... aa.taiAOaNa maf . e .m :,Is.aa.� A ma•m..�m VICINITY MAP tAk • B an0rwwaaWlr OMIT �l� - ;` ,�'taR�(f(El, o RPM,ADAM WAD CAI a¢NMI ufs an UM MP w�ra �`�-��.`\\' Q i , LTI.a AF ., 2, FAFI 1 - Lao A 1.12l.LA CAW :CAA. o aN.n �. "yy�yyt'�0 a"u °A "o x'#IrOnn p�►��� c ..�pyyy '� ` Q' _Q• ..a*Mee N UM 4 41 Y NIC � J1 • { � jetill1 `. GiT..a�Q y, e W ffiU1 UN f U �.': ..a. agar nmf ${`.V��� ,}® 1. =7 ' ,� f1 i (7 1e Kee U an Me Men Oa LID We f) 6 Q,j� f �� •,�1r( •_ {L a (D 6V 00l PY.A4 4IY ". .. A`._"-.:... .--�'W _� 1!' ,� �RF•G �C' •• {• Z =.11'�i la(UArN aal.fsN.$) ..• ..a,4DYtI W ! moot.nca ra amf DWI .. f Z (f.�,Q` © Y ""g°r+a CC 0 I ,t cn • 11. W •ala NONr aal-11Me Ytif.0 [Ll-iNafv. 1�,�/�\`' �a d�. � , j7ii,i o /.014,41:titi 1K I CU ••••4 man nes temp.x arm aN atp.. a Ma vet `�p�s% / ... Lo,.-.-F..Lo,x,AD% _ mn,+ Mem was trim at mat rm lrm at LJ \\N. "Le ��. ele(64FA DP ararm .r.mw era eat .rm to .\�``=dal �n�\��� \\\\ � ,' �` ,..� 4c.aae¢IL 7150 g P �1 arlawe a lel Vale a "\,t^ \\\\a \\\ �,,, /tis,�r lump.RETAIL COYr[PU.L 'MO DIM was • V ..00 a..rs rre . . ` ® 1 "i :FY74AC ' �\\��\e•\ '' 4 `'� i 12� MAW am.apt. . L 9gIM{vt.MNgpefdyalq 0 Ln(m� .a+,i 4664' ft� .s: \ \\%41,\ � ' S9N3Yb aall.�iLiL•'''," 4was = a*eK570N81001 1 n � bk `\�•\\\\\� 3 L ua x uL, ; i \\� da.,a.++n! \\�\`��\\\\ti,.\\\\\\\ Q �I� n Y O PA 1 CT LOD..Cri.l Mer,"01. ; T11p \ O V l \ (..... ...(.1 A. ' '' 4 , i'. Ul In ;,:::.----;;;;:, -----.:,--7.r-4r:tr. :., .1-.'....... , r ,‘% .\\ \, , . .............::::. VW, . \\ A PAWING ANN.1111 • tWL.•l_RAI .� +r rep..COJ ...e . ... ...p,`� w VN�L.— - "•.. �.���.�. Sal. ...._.�..�- .p _ _ ____ L01>-n-1 LL.Kn, p Oi 10 00 410 _ KODG NNI;MM 1 DADS A A 76 1-0045 R,CI i= I.U 0 PETAL DOMIUD GNL 01 PROPOSED SITE PLAN NORTHx"°" SCALE:1/1N.1. SP-PLAN Building Elevations !• Pieter AMries we =� io�i iid�iiii� I�I.�iii�,ili Ci.i! ll�i �i�l ai� �ii1 •�'i'..... .. ! Q, 1 /n ._., v { 1 a I . . . . . 01NORTHELEVATION-PROPOSED it: 1 _-. __-._.. I SCALE:VW-r-cr - Out r d Fe WE u » F _ g- __ �1 1 [gill n.-, ..11 mum " g 14 I-I— g S N - yM� r W"u :1 11611141711.11111A Lt. •.. .° .. ZA21-0045 ".. 'a'x ', 02 WEST ELEVATION-PROPOSED -. SCALE:1,a-i-CrSP-ELEV Landscape ems- . ._ .. - x ,. - -- __ .ram = :▪ .y-+ — -- _=i: \ sc, - -_ �_ . I ./-'e a MOM TIES WACCTON WRE � ---, -/i DJ • a. g� K 0.8017 ACRE `C' }'° 7S4 -.. illiaa•'E,vaesauunv.ls�,.. 0 .r �1 0 EW AE i/NK11101Y'IION - . ea , ...L., • i SEIDLICEPIESIM e=----- --• r 731).'''''' M , i:pf. . . `...., , T itaiikii 7,• t ems s• °.�Iii' . T!' \4, :a -• ^--- ..r A2 TREE PROTECTION/ 40 L1-0045 I I ATink ''T^^ '.�'$�N.flC A�ai.r•- " OI LANDSCAPE PLAN R...... g SP-L PLAN Emc.&TREE IR07ECIIcNIENaNC SUte ina•-t v - Ordinance No. 480-474c