Loading...
Item 7C - PresentationCITY VF IBSOUTHL,A O% Item 7C ZA21-0059 Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan Phillips Edison Development r, _ . OWNER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: !VA0111 Suntree Station LLC Claymoore Engineering • Approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan from "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to redevelop the Magic Texaco lot at 110 W. Southlake Blvd. with an approximately 4,788 square foot retail and restaurant building with drive thru and to include the lot in the same "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan zonin 100 ; inter! F- pubi G Pa*.10 Pe SP e u:m ❑ensi Res iderHial Future Land Use 100 and 110 W. Southlake Blvd. Land Use Designatiom Retail Commercial Future Land Use Update LU TYPE 100-Year Flood Plain Corps of Engineers Propert_ - Public ParklOpen Space Public/Semi-Public Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office Commercial Retail Commercial Mixed Use - Town Center Regional Retail Industrial 255 550 1.180 Feet o � � iwSemi-Pubic i'j •� -''i a 1..�.. 1. � 1 � Zoning 100 and 110 W. Southlake Blvd. SSite te P Generalized Plan District 0 AG 0 C1 RED ASCS ® RE C2 S 2 0 SF1A - C3 SF1B - C4 ® SF2 - NR-PUD 0 SF30 - HC 0 SF20A 0 B1 Rq EMEPA Lo BL 0 SF20B 0 B2 R-PLl a 0 11 CS &0 MF1 12 MF2 0 SP1 S�2 � MH 0 SP2 x �nK zo O CS - BT g � ooMLOL 480-297 0 01 TZa bP ® 02 0 ECZ 01 80-491 E r ' tiJ 1 CS Q -638 S 1 48 -42 48Q 744B [30 4F,r B0-5 O ER T .DBLVD� : go ,9 x� eF WEI t �Y .Kr R D) p.. r 4` _ ��{ ppn��`-- ¢�, I!s' �' i� !. _. � use � • �' i k i 2 �Ar ikeriai vie Previous Zoning and Concept Plan (1991) Ira ----------- -------- ---- -- - - --- It, -L Ito 0 wri EWLNG PPIUFLxru ox ECKERDS TOM THUMB spl-1h RECD N h SITE DATA SUMMARY LOT 2R1 LOT 411 TOTAL EXISTING ZONING SP-2 SP-2 PROPOSED ZONING SP-2 SP-2 - LAND USE DESIGNATION RETAIL/COMMERCIAL RETAILICOMMERCIAL - GROSSINET ACREAGE 7-468 AC 325,295 SF 1.075 AC 46,814 SF 8.54 AC 372,109 SF NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS 1 1 2 PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE 30.051/. 9.98% 27.52% AREA OF OPEN SPACE 36,437 SF 13,332 SF 49,769 SF PERCENTAGE OF OPEN SPACE 11.20% 28.48% 13.37% AREA OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 288,858 SF 33,482 SF 322,340 SF PERCENTAGE OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 88.80% 71.52% 86.63% GROSS BUILDING AREA 98,300 SF 4.788 SF 103,088 SF NUMBER OF STORIES 1 1 - MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35'-0' 36-91 - PROPOSED FLOOR AREA 97,741 SF 4,672 SF 102,413 SF PROPOSED FLOOR AREA BY USE FOOD STORE RETAIL RESTAURANT TOTAL 63,959 SF 28,782 SF 5,000 SF 97,741 SF - 2,322 SF 2,350 SF 4,672 SF 63,959 SF 31.104 SF 7,350 SF 102,413 SF REQUIRED PARKING PARKING RATIO PROVIDED AT 11268 SF 382 SPACES PROVIDED PARKING STANDARD OFF -SITE STANDARD (PARK PROPERTY) HANDICAP TOTAL 315 SPACES - 13 SPACES 328 SPACES 35 SPACES - 2 SPACES 37 SPACES 350 SPACES 18 SPACES 15 SPACES 383 SPACES REQUIERD LOADING SPACES 2 SPACES - 2 SPACES PROVIDED LOADING SPACES 3 SPACES 3 SPACES AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE - - - PERCENTAGE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE - - - ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION START DATE: CONSTRUCTION END DATE: Feb-99 Oct-99 Dec-21 Jun-22 - - 1. t 1 - �r to cog I P&Z Commission Conditions of Aooroval I Aoolicant's Resoonse I Evaluate and provide for adequate screening on the roof. I Not addressed by the applicant. Evaluate and address additional materials or design features on the north and the west. Evaluate different options for entry and exit points specifically for the drive-thru and on the east side but generally overall evaluating the entire drive thru concept as well. Stucco and brick features have been added to the east, west and north elevations and awnings have been added over the doors on the north side. The vertical and horizontal articulation offsets have been increased to comply with the 15% of wall height requirement although the offsets do not comply with the requirement that they extend at least 25% of the length of either adjacent plane. The applicant has submitted two site plan options that show the drive-thru entrance angled to the south and the driveway to the east of the building to be one-way only to the north with "DO NOT ENTER" added to the driveway pavement to discourage traffic entering the drive-thru directly from the N. White Chapel Blvd. driveway. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SITE DATA SUMMARY LOT 2R1 LOT 4R TOTAL (EXISTING ZONING SP-2 SP-2 - PROPOSEDZONING SP-2 SP-2 LAND USE DESIGNATION RETAIL (COMMERCIAL RETAIUCOMMERCIAL - GROSSINET ACREAGE 7.468 AC 325,295 SF 1.075 AC 46,814 SF 8.54 AC 372,109 SF NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS 1 1 2 PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE 30.051A 9.98% 27.52% AREA OF OPEN SPACE 36,437 SF 13,496 SF 49,933 SF PERCENTAGE OF OPEN SPACE 11.20% 28.83% 13.42% AREA OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 288,858 SF 33,318 SF 322,176 SF PERCENTAGE OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 85.8014 71.17% 86.58% GROSS BUILDING AREA 95,300 SF 4,788 SF 103,C88 SF NUMBER OF STORIES 1 1 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT W-U, 39-0" - PROPOSED FLOOR AREA 97,741 SF 4,672 SF 102,413 SF PROPOSED FLOOR AREA BY USE FOOD STORE RETAIL RESTAURANT TOTAL 63,959 SF 28,782 SF 5.000 SF 97,741 SF 2,572 SF 2,100 SF 4,672 SF 63,959 SF 31.354 SF 7,1C0 SF 102,413 SF REQUIRED PARKING PARKING RATIO PROVIDED AT 11268 SF 382 SPACES PROVIDED PARKING STANDARD OFF -SITE STANDARD (PARK PROPERTY) HANDICAP TOTAL 315 SPACES 13 SPACES 328 SPACES 35 SPACES 2 SPACES 37 SPACES 350 SPACES 18 SPACES 15 SPACES 383 SPACES REQUIERD LOADING SPACES 2 SPACES 2 SPACES PROVIDED LOADING SPACES 3 SPACES 3 SPACES AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE PERCENTAGE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION START DATE: CONSTRUCTION END DATE: Feb99 Oct-99 Dec-21 Jun-22 - - 'rt Drive-thru entry angled south and "DO NOT ENTER" added to the driveway pavement to discourage traffic entering the drive-thru directly from N. White _ Chapel Blvd. without circling the building I _ _ { I � i I �, /I Uggt�\ .� V ,� L9G HALLN06BC AEEIYIUN �Aa�NETA.sLo �Na . EEV �� rarclrL Ir/ `NCAIL l­ BINEi > f a a 1 y a sul.oe rRTrr —UB �M�E r EPAUR` I I � r II 1 A II DIIM Drive-thru entry angled south with angled parking PRTCT and "DO NOT ENTER" added to the driveway pavement to discourage traffic entering the drive - thru directly from N. White Chapel Blvd. without circling the building I I - I PRTCT. EASEME CPBINET h, BIA�E 1 I f CSPACES ' ^ _ PRTCT IN �.v14N�r'I+L� XBOT __-._ram" c-�•`9J�WTTMANr—� — • UNIIMENI rUVNc' -. ONJMENT GOJN .. "4'rq&BINETh.—E EMK.�IILT .... z4 v_Nj"T LE zo FARM TO MARKET ROAD 1709 1 W. SOUTHi-AKE BOULEVARD I1 y�T pF WAY WICT�r VRRIES 3.L PER J RTCT The "C-3" uses listed below were excluded as permitted uses with the "S-P-2" zoning for the Tom Thumb center in 1999 Permitted C-3 uses relative to this application consist of any use permitted in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District with the following exceptions: 1. Frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping 2. Bowling alleys 3. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses 4. Lodges, sororities and/or fraternities 5. Medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes 6. Hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors 7. Mortuaries 8. Funeral homes and undertakers 9. Skating rinks, ice and roller (indoor only) 10. Taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments under which the on -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted as required in Section 45 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 11. Movie theaters CITY OF SOUTHLAKE This property shall be subject to the development regulations for the C-3 General Commercial District, and all other applicable regulations with the following exceptions: 1. Impervious coverage will be allowed as shown at 86.63% and calculated for the site as a whole and not on a lot by lot basis. tExisting pproved ratio -1 space per 274 s.f. 2. Allowing parking to be provided for the site as a whole at 383 parking spaces instead of ratio - 1 space per 260 s.f. the required 549 parking spaces for an overall ratio of 1 space per 268 square feet of floor Proposed ratio — 1 space per 268 s.f. area. 3. Allowing existing compact parking as shown. 4. Allowing the existing 5 parallel parking spaces next to the park and 8 parking spaces along the area north of the site and accepting the applicant's commitment that these spaces be constructed with arasscrete. 5. Allowing parking spaces and trash receptacle enclosures to encroach into the bufferyards as existing on Lot 2R1 and as proposed on Lot 4R. 6. Allowing no bufferyards to be required along internal lot lines due to an existing driveway in that location. 7. Allow South bufferyard as provided on the site plan. 8. To allow plans as shown with the understanding that the applicant will work with staff regarding the possibility of additional plantings of cedars be planted in the no disturbance zone adjacent to back of curb on the driveway in that area in lieu of the required 10' screening wall. 9. Allowing a flat roof with a parapet on a building less than 6,000 square feet on Lot 4R. W 10. Allowing vertical and horizontal articulation on existing and proposed buildings as shown. CITY OF II OUTHLAK E Existing Traffic Estimation Lot 2R-1 Use ITE Code Units Quantity Vehicles Per Day PM Peak Ingress Grocer 850 KSF 63,959 6,834 286 Shopping Center 820 KSF 28,782 2,573 104 Restaurant 932 KSF 5,000 561 30 Lot 4-R Fuel Station 945 1 Fuel Pos. 10 2,054 64 TOTAL 12,022 484 NUMBER OF DRIVES 6 6 TOTAL CARS PER DRIVE 2,004 81 Proposed Traffic Estimation Lot 4-R Use ITE Code Units Quantity Vehicles Per Day PM Peak Ingress Grocer 850 KSF 63,959 6,834 286 Shopping Center 820 KSF 28,782 2,573 104 Restaurant 932 KSF 5,000 561 30 Lot 4-R Retail 814 KSF 2,450 92 17 Coffee Shop 937 KSF 2,150 1,764 47 TOTAL 11,824 484 NUMBER OF DRIVES 6 6 TOTAL CARS PER DRIVE 1,971 81 • Current lot line Both buildings to be removed aEEo I I F' `� �� ° ac.asa�ocvbnnoaa {fL � ,"PA1Ci � J I Fit ----- ------- J FrAN TO x4R1�T gnnD 11b9 W. � IrLAlrE gptkTVRa� PLANT SCHEDULE ACCENT TREES CODE BOTANICAL I COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT ® V • CR Lager t—ia'mdica x fauri.i 'Tuscarora' j Tuscarora Crap. Myr11. 30 GAL 3" CAL- �1 --- CANOPYTREES CODE BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE PICOT 0 BO Ouercus maomoarpa I Burr Oak B & B 7 CAL. ' a ; EXISTING TREES CODE BOTANICAL I COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT E4 Existing tree to remain _.. si SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL I COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER z RY Hesperaloe parvilif Red Yucca 5 GAL 36, OC DB Ilex ocmuta ' Burfordii Nana' j Dwarf Burford Holly 5 GAL 361 OC ' DY Ilex vomitaria'Nana' I Dwarf Yaupon Holly 5GAL 36.00 DH Rhaphiolepis mdica 'Pinkie' 1 Pinkie Indian Hawthorn 5 GAL ae, OC l SP 5piraea x'Bailcarol'TM lSundmp Spirea 5GAL 38'OC 1= Q 1® SODISEED CODE BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME OTY O G co Cynodon dactylon 'Td 419' ! Td 419 Bermuda Grass 9,741 at HEIGHT OTY 8' Ht- 11 HEIGHT OTY 12' HT 5 HEIGHT QTY e SPACING S& 0.0. 16 W G.D. 52 36' o.c. 29 W 0.0. 47 36' o.o. 25 I ,i srve xrcuwcro f ._. cremeTwwoeaw. PLANT SCHEDULE �' CR lagerstrcemaintliraxfauriei'Tusrarxxa'1Tuararora Crape Mytlk 90 GAL 9'CAL CANOPYTREES CODE SOTANICALICOMMOM NAME NAME Rom SIZE So Qlx— ahumardiif Shumard Retl Oak 986 4•Cal • CE4 Ulmus crassifdia f Cedar Elm H 8 B 2 Cd_ E STINGTREES CODE BOTANICAL I COMMON NAME Rom SIZE (1�7y 1j N E4 Existing tree to remain — SHRUBS CODE BOTANICALI COMMON NAME SIZE COMPAINEH RY Heaps panriAora Red Y— 5GAL woc ❑D ilea mmrna'Burtordii Nara' fDwad Burbrd Molly 5GAL woc �. cy 11«varrraoda'Nana lowad vaupnn Hdy SGAL woc DH RhapNiolepis Indira' Pinkie' f Pinkie Intlun Hawthorn 5 GAL woc - SP Spiraeax'Bailcarol'TMjSuntlrop Spires 5GAL woc SODISEED CODE DOTANICALl COMMON NAME QT CD Cy,mtlon dadylon'T99191Ttl 419 Bermuda Grass 9,71J sf x x XX� * 9 trees to remain X 6 trees to be removed e r6N1[N01 �MFfNGNOF'Y - siaNEot TENANT VERTICAL �~ ARTICULATION 18%OFFSET FROM 22' -0" TO 26'-0" AW M SOUTH ELEVATION VtHIK- Elevations at P&Z Commission 8/19/2021 1O 27-8"T026'-" eirsTniw SOUTH ELEVATION 177 J. VERTICAL auTicuLArloN WEST ELEVATION 18%OFFSET FROM , \�\ 22'-0"TO26'-o" Revised Elevations for City Council 9/7/2021 r.o.r 2 a- r.os. NORTH ELEVATION ARTICULATION EAST ELEVATION 18%OFFSET FROM 22' -0" TO 26'-O" Elevations at P&Z Commission 8/19/2021 V tK 1 lIAL ARTICULATION NORTH ELEVATION 15%OFFSET FROM 22' -0" TO 25'-4" ARTICULATION \ 15%OFFSET FROM 22' -O" TO 25'-4" EAST ELEVATION Revised Elevations for City Council 9/7/2021 HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION - 15%(22')-3'-4" 4672 SF HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION 15% (22'k3'-4" FRONT ELEVATION HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION 15% (22)-T-4" ° BACK ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/8" =1'-0" �'I S11-11E SIDE ELEVATIONS DUMPSTER HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION 15% (22')=&-4" HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION - 15%(22')-3'-4" 47 O3 SC HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION 15% (22')-3'-4" HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION 15% (22)=T-4" FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/8" -1'-0" FRONT ELEVATION "Mil-R& __ BACK ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATIONS DUMPSTER �. $.. � .� �•�� r ' ., l v �a IF 7T - —_ "4 --1 r -: T f�• u Y n s 3 .5, F� o �'p 0 545 914 703 O L 10 n4 340 320 300 250 240 220 200 160 140 120 160 10' 90 913 707 900 902 904 90fi 911 a 713 1� 909 v 901 903 905 907 For: 200 Ur ty way Opposed: 406 Un9y Way Undecided: 300 U�tty Way 900 992904 1012 1014 1 00 UNITY WAY UN! �h'AY�pARK API \P 901 9R3 1013 01 �' Rp) g 9a> r2 8a `b9 285 N Y PP1 K RID) o° Bey �B 0 21 600 4 �EDOM L�4 a 8r ' �¢ d'o� o 8Ts �'L 875 gqp 620 a17 1 200 222 E SOUT LAKE 660 600 500 480 4 410 400 BL VO 121 E Soll'l7i�KE 8!_1/[1 �nJ $04.ITHLA 1 171 151 20 177 F. M. 1709 fL 211 211 � 1 521 40 475 465 2251 271 502 100 142'355301231 3510l251 241 185191101221261 113 10 �074 281 271 251 190 180 241 231 1p8� YL�S _ 107 r o`y August 19, 2021; Approved (6-0) subject to the staff report dated August 181 2021 and Revised Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 18, 2021; • Noting the applicant's willingness to evaluate and provide for adequate screening on the roof. Also noting the applicant's willingness to evaluate and address additional materials or design features on the north and the west. And also noting the applicant's willingness to evaluate different options for entry and exit points specifically for the drive-thru and on the east side but generally overall evaluating th ntire driv thru concept as well. ICITY OF SOUTHLAKE a CITY OF SOUTHL,A Questions?