Item 7A - SPIN ReportJUSOUTHLAKE
SPIN MEETING REPORT
SPIN Item Number: SPIN2021-16
City Case Number: ZA2021-0053
Project Name: Ferguson Place
SPIN Neighborhood: 2
Meeting Date: July 27, 2021
Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance: 38
Host: Sherry Berman, Community Engagement Committee
CEC Members in attendance: Vamsi Alla and Muhammad Igbal
Applicant Presenting: Kosse Maykus, Maykus Homes and Neighborhoods; Phone: 817-
991-8182; Email: kosse(a-)_maykus.com
City Staff Present: Madeline Oujesky, Assistant to the Director
Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthiake.com and clicking on 1 Want to" and "View"
"Video on Demand" — forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date.
FORUM SUMMARY:
Property Situation:
The property is located at 2569 Lonesome Dove Road and 2593 Lonesome Dove Road.
Development Details:
Proposing RPUD zoning for a 1.03 acre tract in Southlake, which is also part of a larger
assemblage of properties and proposed development for a residential neighborhood, primarily in
neighboring Grapevine. The idea is to have a seamless neighborhood, with streets and utilities
managed by an Interlocal Agreement between Southlake and Grapevine.
Presentation:
Ferguson Place
Presentation to the City
U(iC!/U 6�wk
0 E V E L 0 F I f R T
He C e k D�vow t
Soulldake, T— 76 2
S �
souu 5 .mom
f'erausott Place
Fxisting Property: Tm) lots on over 1 acre. Access easement on north PL.
site survey.
}
Ferouson F/acr
Retain two lots, add adjacent streets within Southlake. R-PUD Zoning Request.
Ferguson Wage
Overall Neighborhood Plan
Ferguson Place
Overall Neighborhood Plan
- 11,70
t r rl
Questions and Concerns:
Lot 5ize Range
?,511 s f. — 12,061 s.f.
&mthlake Lots
11,785 s.f a 12,061 0
FeMusonf Place
Overall Neighborhood Plan
Lot Size Range
7,511 s,f. — 12,061 s.L
Ferguson Place
Overall Neighborhood Plan
Lot Sim Range
7,511 s.f.— 12,061 s.f.
Southlake Lots
11,785 0. & 12,061 0.
Open Space
f 41.6%
1. Could you please give an update on where in the process this development is with
the City of Grapevine?
Submitted in June, has gone through initial infrastructure review, and are in the
midst of a second review. The City of Grapevine has their Planning and Zoning
meeting on the same day, and will meet on August 17, 2021.
Meeting with next week with staff from Southlake and Grapevine in Grapevine to
discuss ILA. Plans will include drainage from Lonesome Dove homes to go to
proposed park. Saving over 100 original oak trees and park will be maintained by
grapevine as a regional park.
2. What is the current lot size required by grapevine?
Seeking R-75 with grapevine.
3. Why are we considering changing the zoning in the area which is designated from
1 acre to half, when they could combine the properties and make a lovely 1 acre
home? I don't understand how the City of Grapevine factors in here and I am
worried about the precedence it will set for further subdividing into smaller parcels
of land. Currently there are many multimillion -dollar homes being built why does
this need to change?
Everything zoned north of 114 is not required to be 1 acre. It has been pointed out
in showing acreage to the west. These lots will start at $900,000 to $1 million, and
we have noticed tremendous demand for small acreage. These Southlake lots are
also following as they exist currently with existing buildings. Residents of the
development will attend Southlake schools.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official
meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and
the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are
strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Southlake Connect Results for the July 27, 2021 SPIN Town Hall Forum
-],
Detailed Notification Analysis
snx Sewnn5n 5enan .uMx�. xvn
m a .Wix4mii ■[ nrx mMa.."p.e.
�'^*Ye v� ■�aclw.�
auaq Yx tld�aia
a..e"" .n9•] aYe...[+4�.a..SrvaY mu rasa
Gaa�1Ma�. M.eN 1ID5 l.eM
rl.[NanP�'n.eenoan ,x5 nuf
nn� �[mu[Pan Not me 5.5is
N"[Mnbetl-dpeeaPeM1 M6 �e]a
n'1RranynewM. ]eiad�n�lzlv155to5 ve
alaYA�, Exr ge-nep.ns
Th. MnF�a ] emmP dwmP[ann"P tnn"P we,�P m,�ot eneim[emmP[2ua
nary o e e e o e a a e e
nan o e n 5ta e o 0 o e �
LL
txkA L'
fYn�i �nw"q ntamoe NcnetA�.a aw"q paeiM nnme[nnmetnmmo[5aa�
N�a�me.gsr.ereMge�eVmy�I�iMm5219i591o5 ]s
Evxdpg. Mepms
Tm�i tN� ea�ya e.amP�Ax"P Aa."P wa„A wa+9[euneN.+mmP TmY
nary e e e e e o e e e e
"ery e e e e m e e e e m
M
nary e e e e e o e e e e