The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 6F - PresentationCITY VF OSOUTHL,4 ZA21-0048 Ridgecrest Property Zoning Change and Concept Plan APPLICANT: OWNERS: REQUEST: Hat Creek Development Thomas Keen and Stephen Fertitta Approval of a 2nd Reading for a Zoning Change and Concept Plan from "AG" Agricultural Distric with "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District] Public Parki0pen Space ial ■-Residential: III Retail Commercial Public/Semi-Public mixed Use ■ �.Town ■ Center r� Regional Retail �� • ' Industrial 1 30D 600 1,20D Feet AM '_ ` �ullllllllll#�"��Ifl� IIIII � - 'vlo,F Jim AV 621, � &Orr fo: IN I ®r L AeriView Private Street S [Ridgecrest Drive RP6 grit i Ridgecrest Drive Fk Iry AN, g 4'a, Private Street- - I -A Site Photographs 106 _� �G _ Concept `C' Proposed at 1st Reading a�� .m... «..., as �..+�....� ... _.. rNt u.MINY MMIIAM °. Notes: . _ ae d''Typral Jlar 5e�hadsare 4d "I'lll -sde 5Nbads are 20' T11-i, a 6' Omamental Iron Fence r: s,.nnslx *mr.xmt Uvrter� Frigineer: wr. rx r6e.e �nqp: PP4'd ry(xq P£ Applicant: PA. �x92f.T �w,r�xau . e.rssl�lsx m�ea m lelea Planner: 1pp��Aq pp SAGE GNDIIP, [W ZIAL'G 21 e w pq MM I �� aM APPP `2 al I e I 9eus i I � I a'sn�as� I� ...o.... _. L Is I yarswr g l l 93barviI 4 I° k Existing AG 6r I Lldll: Ww rJdte tl11flIi11 r / � `� I L- L I Site Data Summary Chart Existing Existing Proposed Number Average ROW Net Density Net A—ge Gross Zoning Land Use Zoning of Lots Lot Size Dedication (— Per Acreage (s.f.) Acreage net aaee9e)'��^) 9.914 AG Low Densi SF-1A 9 44,413 0.48 ac 0.91 Lots/ac 9.914 ac 10.3975 Residential . lr7elwlwArh�rn C 'rriegZ®mr. AG wocu.3wMraaw.n nL��pAID qI`x I I� IyE' laZii ai ,{ , la ILL ICn lar aa'q Rr1Ix,L1 , Case No_ ZA21-0048 Concept Plan Ridgeerest Property Joel W. Chivers Survey, Abstract 350, Tract 1001E16, 1COM, MEIC, 1C1E1A1 & 1COIEIA So a e, Tarren: County, Texas Tree CarneyC—ge TGI•i area 452,9B sf. T.A aging r..Tv 5F,619s1— 1L5 R,.—dtree pan%(great) 40,1164..— 70.65% P.-I&p--.d—m Wp(yd—) 2,712 sL 4.M% R.—dtree canmr NO M.35% 100.W% s naeare. ai,gP _ rir o,W] owner: }'m,_. � ran aid h,dsa K ein tnSRy R SwnAWx, Tex ]609] Owner: xeYsey � sem�s�c rem�erex [W.Ir Yxp �dwM Pd., 91m 3Cf P'Ae,>y xdx+6 Ttl'.mT}p-0dB mnh,,2 W}d MR Pt Apphallt: PA. mx 9i]V muUthb. Tea ]R49x Pluc41T991A1@ mnh2 l�16�Le Planner: SAGE GROUPI, INC. 23 AUG 21 t , ® ELM PayZmt{HPLID i�:Py(Y Aw•11�n 7Nw Po�Si�II1G YRIw��R�RMYI ffi� Tn 6.]G Jleprewatl wawnr —9� LmW M.tl SE�w 1,a'tiug ZmmF RPffD lu��i.inmA.uertl •_-^•...Wore yEri�p7��8F]-i� - avr,W ronErma— WQ IevCr'y RUYxfY .+ Tree Conservation Analysis Ri Case No_ ZA21-0048 Site Data Summary Chart (2nd Reading) Site Data Summary 1st Reading qM 2nd Reading (revised concept plan) Existing Zoning AG AG Proposed Zoning SF-1A SF-1A Land Use Designation Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Gross/Net Acreage 10.4/9.15 10.3975/9.914 Residential Lots 9 lots 9 lots Net Density .96 lots/acre .91 lots/acre Open Space % NA NA Lot Area Range 43,641 sf to 49,869 sf 43,565 sf to 44,247 sf Average Lot Area 45,785 sf 44,413 sf Surrounding Property Owner Responses Planning and Zoning Commission August 5, 2021; Approved (4-1) subject to the Staff Report dated July 30, 2021 and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated July 30, 2021, and noting the following; approving the requested variances, as requested; the applicant agrees to escrow the funds for the future sidewalks as required; the driveway for Lot 7 will be on the private drive, not onto Ridgecrest Drive; the driveways for Lots 1 and 6 would be into the cul-de-sac and not onto Ridgecrest Drive; an agreement on the part of the applicant to have a discussion with a traffic engineer, acknowledging the challenge of measuring traffic in a residential area; agreeing to mandate circular drives on Lots 71. 81 and 9; looking at options with signage for safety along the private drive; and agreeing to continue a dialogue with the residents in the area for solutions for their concerns; adding a consideration for ribbon curbs on the private drive to address road concerns and vegetation concerns; the applicant would delay developing Lots 5 and 6 until Lots 8 and 9 are developed (to allow construction traffic on Lots 5 and 6 and not on the private street); and the applicant's agreement to install wrought iron fencing and not a masonry wall along Ridge surrounding the development. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council 1st Reading August 17, 2021; Approved (6-0) at the 1st Reading, subject to the Staff Report dated August 10, 2021, and Concept Plan Review Summary No. #2, dated July 301, 2021; noting that we are approving Option 'C' as presented tonight; and also noting that Lots 1, 6, and 7 will be fronting to Ridgecrest Drive; also noting that we are granting the option on Lots 6 and 7 will have the option to have access off of Ridgecrest Drive and Lot 1 must have access to Ridgecrest Drive; also noting, we are instructing the developer to speak with the Fire Marshal to insure the requirements of the Fire Department will be met with Option 'C' in time for the 2,d Reading at City Council.iii�� CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CITY VF FIL a SOUTHL,4 Questions?