Item 7B - PresentationCITY VF
OSOUTHL,4
ZA21-0048
Ridgecrest Property
Zoning Change and Concept Plan
ZA21-0048 Ridgecrest Property
•IM!\ I [•
Public Parki0pen Space
ial
■-Residential:
III
Retail Commercial
Public/Semi-Public
mixed Use
■ �.Town
■
Center
r�
Regional Retail
�� �� • '
Industrial
1 30D 600 1,20D
Feet
AM
'_ `
�ullllllllll#�"��Ifl�
IIIII � -
'vlo,F
OWE
'77
- - - .e
* I» ELM
It
Jkf
XA
OF
Aw
vo
CAN
� � may'.. � I .r•� ' ����t?� �� � f, ,r — '�'k• � �ti
w� �:.. ■
_ y
yj��{,
Ak__"j rr
_A
MEN
A' V 'LAINI l 1t7fET.'.�iw_'.� '.c MI&A, I...i r
AeriaiView
� �aG Sum Chart
may dis .. +ew
n.e.l
o... ti Stu 9 n'e one A � i4's�s
�arw�nr.�a
Owner:
Engineer:
macw�ae�e o xe P.e
Applicant:
swxr. r� awsx
a.ee
[� sae wpm
planna: saw r;R��uF, INC,
19 suLM U
® ELM
4 �t�AT6 ST►�„y!F "yf o � _' __' wwmP�
��-----
I
r:;:.e�zma:aauo g aaear�t , !a 1 7, 1 9 I
uc: u�e P.alop, aj�
I
.17s'
i
nm�r�sareoa 4° I I I 5
as,xn,
_ "el axnnu
L
axna:c IE
axlas�
a I i
�or.ubnarr a i
Case No. ZA21-0048
Concept Plan Ridgeerest Property
SiR 9Ma Sum Chart
is+J
SFu 9 E+65 635� 0]�c a �. �n aex
Fenvq f Wall rRavdR
Fence 1 Wall reoend
v GrcmaPai Lon.�eme
Owner:
TMnve R Caro ptl�n M. Vmi
Owner:
9nrn McLetl re�aaa me rr�e em, rum
aus nu�,rr.
Engineer:
ua ionmm rm. saxxi3
Td: @I1-33]2dN
�fne[t RYLed trLtlS P.L
Applicant:
xn ogaoeewpre.
Planner: sacs exaw, we
p ,,ppyy pp r��
19JULE
Case No. 7A21-0048
Tree Canopy Coverage
Total sibs area 4SZ913 sf.
Tod exio&r canopy 56,619 r.f. —n 12.SW
a Preserved tree canopy (green) 41A57 s.f. —> 73.93%
;. Possibe preserved tree canopy (yellow) SIM &F. —n IM6%
a Renaved tree canopy [red) B.728 &f. —> 15A1%
55,274 r.f. -> 1GOAK °16
Liagerid
PI6S,,GC Tree i:r nopy
P=bIt lrewTn d Tree Uin ,
Re'r tired Tree Ca-M
Eu,� 2aemF RPIrD
WP �flk� l� Oorz°
Eri.�pYmmf SPNL4
wmu.o.ra�ra.u.t
i 44.0.3'_sf. —
�
d I 4A791
sI assetze
` yl Iei I 49,mLt
I
. I I ° _xisting ZOmn& AV II q
— Luu:�nrCWrelriBBs�� ! P
U.-M cf 1 y ~j Eu,�g zoo: sc
51 I is I / � 1 I '. uxtr m.nr n�uwrir
_1 4 I
WO wOwlry LYtlNr n� T, •J p :�i
43.7U s£ I a 43LMLf l l
'un
wa l°z WJ7rIWd.Wr
Site Data Summary Chart
Site Data Summary M I
Rid ecrest Property
Existing Zoning
AG
Proposed Zoning
SF-1A
Land Use Designation
Low Density Residential
Gross/Net Acreage
10.4/9.15
Residential Lots
9 lots
Net Density
.96 lots/acre
Open Space %
NA
Lot Area Range
43,641 sf to 49,869 sf
Average Lot Area
45,785 sf
Variance Requested
1) Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended,
requiring all lots front on a street per Sections 8.01A & 5.04, to
allow Lots 8 & 9 to be accessed via a private drive.
2) Variance to Subdivision Ordinance 483, Section 5.06, Sidewalks, to
allow for no sidewalk requirement along the private drive.
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
3
ERG-1
)E
§`§
�
�
g2/
§13
2--
I
-A
Site Photographs
106
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Planning and Zoning Commission
August 5, 2021; Approved (4-1) subject to the Staff Report dated July 30, 2021 and Concept Plan
Review Summary No. 2 dated July 30, 2021, and noting the following; approving the requested
variances, as requested; the applicant agrees to escrow the funds for the future sidewalks as
required; the driveway for Lot 7 will be on the private drive, not onto Ridgecrest Drive; the
driveways for Lots 1 and 6 would be into the cul-de-sac and not onto Ridgecrest Drive; an
agreement on the part of the applicant to have a discussion with a traffic engineer, acknowledging
the challenge of measuring traffic in a residential area; agreeing to mandate circular drives on Lots
71. 81 and 9; looking at options with signage for safety along the private drive; and agreeing to
continue a dialogue with the residents in the area for solutions for their concerns; adding a
consideration for ribbon curbs on the private drive to address road concerns and vegetation
concerns; the applicant would delay developing Lots 5 and 6 until Lots 8 and 9 are developed (to
allow construction traffic on Lots 5 and 6 and not on the private street); and the applicant's
agreement to install wrought iron fencing and not a masonry wall along Ridgecrest Drive
surrounding the development. I WH
Commissioner Dyche dissented for concerns of the lots fronting on a private drive and the
requested variances. ITY OF
VSOUTHLAKE
Lf
CITY OF
SOUTHLAK
Applicant's presentation