Loading...
Item 6B - PresentationCITY VF SOUTHL,4 Item 613 ZA21-0039 Site Plan Mustang Business Park ZA21-0039 Zoning 1800 SH 26 1-1: Industrial District DAG C1 11 �RE C2 0 SF1A C3 0 SF1B C4 12 ® SF2 - NR -PUD 0 SF30 HC 0 SF20A 0 B1 0 SF20B 0 B2 - R -PDD 0 11 ® MF1 12 MF2 0 SP1 - MH 0 SP2 11 f ® CS DT 0 41 TZD 0 02 ECZ 11 12 PUD ; If } I i r.w^1.i ki MINI Aim XV r "' 1�1�^'e �. y - _� :r +.M r sem,.'. '•6'�y i� ;ti 3 k ..� — AT � �y;�} ��ry�gQ I I TFF f .1 MYTH 2400 Mustang Ct Southlake, Texas Google (�—j - Street View E . IOPOW Street View E 1 p 4" I - - - 7777177777 --- Height ="- --li— Height 39' �u 4, Height 39'9" Height 39'3" ii o- fi I I I FH 11.5.1 111 8� f, April 8, 2021 ZA21-0007 a Driveway relocated to meet stacking depth — min. 150' required and 190' shown Building heights reduced to 35' to comply with "I-1" District May 20, 2021 ZA21-0039 Ilii p. = Emergency only access driveway GENERAL SITE DATA LOT AREA (SQUARE FEET AND ACRES) 1,143,014 SF/ 26.24 A C EX STI NG ZON ING 11(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) PROPOSED ZONING 11 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) EX LAND USE VACANT LAND USE DESIGNATION f e�. GENERAL SITE DATA LOT AREA (SQUARE FEET AND ACRES) 1,143,014 SF/ 26.24 A C EX STI NG ZON ING 11(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) PROPOSED ZONING 11 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) EX LAND USE VACANT LAND USE DESIGNATION INDUSTRIAL AND 100 -YEAR FLOOD PLAIN PROP LAND USE SPECULATIVE DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE BUILDING HEIGHT (#STORIES) 35-00" / 1 STORY MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FT BUILDING AREA 340,1865F BUILDING AREA BY USE: OFFICE (7%) 23,813 SF WAREHOUSE (93%) 316,367 SF BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 29,80% IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 70.9496 IMPERVIOUS AREA 810,8545F PERCENTAGE OPENSPACE 29.06% AREA OPENSPACE 332,1605F PARKING TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED` 396SPACES TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD 388 SPACES HANDICAP 10SPACES (9REQUIRFD) TOTAL 398SPAC€S * 1 SPACE PER 1,0005FOF WAREHOUSE * 1 SPACE PER 300SF OF OFFICE REQUIRED LOADINGSPACES BUILDING 1:9; BUILDING2: 6; BUILDING3:6 PROVIDED LOADINGSPACES(=60') BUILDING 1: 38, BUILDING 2:19; BUILDING 3:24 AREA OF OUTSI DE STORAGE 0 SF PERCENTAGE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE 0% ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION START DATE: Jan -22 CONSTRUCTION END DATE: Jun -23 Site Data Summary April 8, 2021 May 20, 2021 Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning "S -P-1" "1-1" Gross/Net Acreage 26.24 ac. 26.24 ac. Open Space Area 8.10 ac. 7.62 ac. Open Space % 30.87% 29.06% Imp. Coverage Area 18.14 ac. 18.61 ac. Imp. Coverage % 69.13% 70.94% Max. Building Height 40' 35' Building 1 Area (sq. ft.) 174,600 174,600 Building 2 Area (sq. ft.) 78,100 78,100 Building 3 Area (sq. ft.) 87,480 87,480 Total Bldg. Area (sq. ft.) 340,180 340,180 Building Area By Use Office (sq. ft.) 20,410(6%) 23,813(7%) Warehouse (sq. ft.) 319,770 (94%) 316,367 (93%) Parking Required 388 396 Parking Provided 392 398 I ir- i\.1 \! v X. /hJ ,\/ X V / / / Parking Ratios Office = 1/300 sq. ft. Warehouse = 1/1,000 sq. ft. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING -1: 39'3" BUILDING -2: 39'-0" BUILDING -3: 39'3" BUILDING -1 IYVRI I9 CLCVAI IVIV EAST ELEVATION wJ WEST ELEVATION PAINT COLOR SCHEME: ❑WINTER WHITE ❑FOGGY GREY ■MORTAR GREY ■ P4 ACCENT ARCHITECTURAL GRAY ■ P-5 (ACCENT) KOLIBRI BLUE MATERIALS: ■ ALUMINUM/ STOREFRONT GLAZING CONCRETE TILT -UP PANEL WITEXTURED FINISH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING _ 1 BUILDING- 1: 35'-0" BUILDING -2: 35'-0" BUILDING - 3: 35'-0" NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ®I.i_ 1■ ■1■ ■1■ 011111 111011 L1■ L1L ■1■'■1■ ■1■ ■ WEST ELEVATION --- 'Inn --I SOUTH ELEVATION PAINT COLOR SCHEME: ❑WINTER WHITE ❑FOGGY GREY MORTAR GREY ■ P4 ACCENT ARCHITECTURAL GRAY ■ P-5 (ACCENT) KOLIBRI BLUE MATERIALS: ■ ALUMINUM/ STOREFRONT GLAZING wME ❑ CONCRETE TILT -UP PANEL Wl TEXTURED FINISH J / 'W ■ METAL PANEL METAL SIDING / ■ NICHIHAACM 1 SPRUCE WOOD May 20, 2021 SCHEME: PANEL X` n n MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING -1: 39'3" BUILDING -2: 39'-0" BUILDING -3: 39'3" PAINT COLOR SCHEME: ❑ ■ ALUMINUM/ WINTER INTER W HITE ❑FOGGY GLAZING GREY ■MORTAR PANEL Wl TEXTURED GREY ■ PA ACCENT METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL GR, METAL SIDING P-5 (ACCENT) NICHIHAACM KOLIBRI BLUE MATERIALS' ■ ALUMINUM/ STOREFRONT GLAZING CONCRETE TILT -UP PANEL Wl TEXTURED FINISH ■ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING NICHIHAACM SPRUCE WOOD PANEL WEST ELEVATION ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ EAST ELEVATION April1 111 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING - 1: 35'-0" BUILDING -2: 35'-0" BUILDING - 3: 35'-0" ■■����1���� 1111; N 0111 now, - Ila EAST EqLEVATIO nom: I _._- I .l I PAINT COLOR SCHEME ❑ ■ ALUMINUM/ W INTER W HITE W11 ❑FOGGY GLAZING GREY ■MORTAR PANEL Wl TEXTURED GREY ■ PA ACCENT METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL GRA METAL SIDING P-5 (ACCENT) NICHIHAACM KOLIBRI BLUE MATERIALS' ■ ALUMINUM/ STOREFRONT GLAZING CONCRETE TILT -UP PANEL Wl TEXTURED FINISH ■ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING NICHIHAACM SPRUCE WOOD PANEL WEST ELEVATION J SOUTH ELEVATION hAlkNEW May 20, 2021 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING -1: 39'3" BUILDING -2: 39'-0" BUILDING -3: 39'3" BUILDING - 3 PAINT COLOR SCHEME: ❑ ■ ALUMINUM/ WINTER INTER W HITE ❑FOGGY GLAZING GREY ■MORTAR PANEL Wl TEXTURED GREY ■ PA ACCENT METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL GR, METAL SIDING P-5 (ACCENT) NICHIHAACM KOLIBRI BLUE ELEVATIONNORTH ELEVATION A&F EAST I oil min ■ MATERIALS' ■ ALUMINUM/ STOREFRONT GLAZING CONCRETE TILT -UP PANEL Wl TEXTURED FINISH ■ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING NICHIHAACM SPRUCE WOOD PANEL SII =�� ° � �1■■�1��� WEST ELEVATION emmmmmmmmmmmm�i SOUTHELEUATIO April 8, 2021- ZA21-0007 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING - 1: 35'-0" BUILDING -2: 35'-0" BUILDING - 3: 35'-0" BUILDING - 3 PAINT COLOR SCHEME ❑ ■ ALUMINUM/ W INTER W HITE W11 ❑FOGGY GLAZING GREY ■MORTAR PANEL Wl TEXTURED GREY ■ PA ACCENT METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL GR, METAL SIDING P-5 (ACCENT) NICHIHAACM KOLIBRI BLUE NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION MATERIALS' ■ ALUMINUM/ STOREFRONT GLAZING CONCRETE TILT -UP PANEL Wl TEXTURED FINISH ■ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING NICHIHAACM SPRUCE WOOD PANEL WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION May 20, 2021 � ; �'�-' _ - �"� ; .: xr. � �,� sit i+s. :.► '7 View at Entrance Section at North Property Line 1235 Woodsey Ct Southlake, Texas jGoogle (, . Street View ImagecapMe.Oct2018 02021Google United States Tenns Report a problem Street View 1235 Tmherline Ct Southlake, Texas ~ 1 Google ok . Slreet View f s� Street View Imagecapture Oct 21.j ------------ n� it F: v, 0 Tree Canopy Cover Summary Total Site Area 1,142,784 (sf) Total Existing Canopy Coverage (sf) 253,758.5 22,3% of site Required Preservation 38,063.8 15% of Existing Canopy Current Preserved (sf) I 70,125,1 27.6% of Existing Canopy I Tree Inches Being Removed ToW Tree Inches Removed 8,380.1 Total Tree Canopy SIF Removed l 183,633-4 Total Tree Canopy Percent Removed 72.4% of Existing Canopy *mj g, Rcwm-- ired canopy to be preserved — 60%* ;01 % f 000 , I (% ? -- 1, 0 —27.6% W. ft * w • ,, V 0 Proposed canopy to be preserved • 'e. w * * w 0,441 op RA, •0 00 LE,--IEND -b- f 'A -FING GMOPY WWER TO EM Aw- Ift z k� BE REMOVED Variance Requested Ado, i pff ji- J) E)KT1NG GANGFY GOVER TO BE PROTECTED EXS­I­NG TREE TO BE REM)VEE EXIFrING DEGUNINQMAZARD TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE PROTEGTED TREE PROTEM014 FENUNG, REF DETAIL P, THIS SHEET GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 1C0 "01110� There is approximately 22.3% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 60% is required to be preserved per Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-E. A variance is requested to allow approximately 27.6% of the existing tree cover to be preserved. CITY OF SOUTHLA,KE The City Council may authorize a variance to any provision of this Ordinance following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. A request for a variance to any provision in this Ordinance shall be accompanied by a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan as outlined in Article 6, or other documentation requested by the Administrative Official, and the following factors shall be considered in evaluating the variance request: i. Whether a literal enforcement of the Ordinance will create an undue hardship or an unreasonable practical difficulty on the applicant; ii. Whether the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed; iii. Whether a reasonable accommodation or alternative solution can be made to accomplish the desired activity without the alteration of the tree; iv. Whether the variance will injure or be wholly compatible with the use and future or existing development of adjacent properties; V. Whether the increased development costs caused by preserving the tree create an undue hardship on the development of the site; vi. Whether there is any identified adverse effect of the alteration or preservation on erosion, soil moisture retention, flow of surface water, and drainage systems; vii. Whether there is any substantial impact to the buffering of residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of non-residential uses; viii. Whether costs versus the benefits of relocating required utility service infrastructure and easements based on preservation or alteration of protected trees; ix. Whether the proposed tree replacement procedures adequately mitigate the alteration of the tree• x. Whether the alteration adversely affects the public health, safety or welfare; and X '` , W" ' , , � � I xi. Whether the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this Ordinance to the greatest degree reasonably possible. NN/0' CITY OF S©UTHLAKE.' LEGEND BUFFER REOUIRED PLANTINGS SITE REQUIRED PLANTINGS FREE MITIGATION PLANTINGS EXISTING IREE8 TO REMAIN -OPOSCU WILDING REF ARCHITECTURE 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 'LDN' 1URE. PROP�EC BUILDING RCF ARCHITECTURE 113. U.1-111 REF ARCHITUCTURE --- - - - - - --- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REF. ARCHITECTURE April 8, 2021 ZA21-0007 Mitigation Trees v La C, _40— C9, Canopy — 83 Accent - 333 PROPOSED BUILDING R�. ARCHITECTURE ImE m BUILDING REF ARCHITECTURE PROPOSEDBUILDING PR�SEO BUILDING REF ARCHITE-RF -.POSFD BUIL01ING REF AACHIT�CTURF May 20, 2021 ZA21-0039 Surrounding Property Owner Responses CITY VF SOUTHL,4 Questions?