Item 6D - PresentationThe Conservation (FKA Burney Estates)
Item 6D ZA20-0049 (Ord. No. 480-773)
ZA20-0049
OWNER:Marylyn Miles and Errol &Leslie Housmans
APPLICANT:Rockwater Developments
REQUEST:Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan to
develop 8 residential lots on approximately 13.1 acres.
The applicant is requesting to rezone one existing “SF-1A”
lot and one tract zoned “AG”Agricultural District,totaling
approximately 13.1 acres.
LOCATION:2970 Burney Lane and 3185 Southlake Park Dr.
Regional Aerial
Proposed Development Plan –Option A
Proposed Development Plan –Option B
Future Land Use
Corps of
Engineers
Low Density
Residential
Medium
Density
Residential
Floodplain
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
AG
SF-1A
SF-20B
Environmental
Legend for environmental map:
•thin blue lines –2-foot contours
(elevations labeled in yellow)
•thick blue line –creek
(Kirkwood Branch)
•orange shaded areas represent
100-year flood plain areas
•transparent light blue shaded
areas represent 500-year flood
plain areas
Environmental
Legend for environmental map:
•light green shaded areas
represent existing tree cover
•opaque light blue shaded areas
represent tree preservation
areas
•thick blue line –creek
(Kirkwood Branch)
USACE Property
Tree Preservation Plan –Option A
Tree Preservation Plan –Option B
Thoroughfare Plan
Site
Existing and Future Pathways/Trails/Parks Map
Site
Existing and Future Pathways/Trails/Parks Map
Site
Lot 6 –Common Area (Loch Meadow Estates)
Plat –Loch Meadow Estates
Harbor Court Trailhead / Huse Homeplace
Option A Comparison Plan since 1st Reading
Gross + Net Acreage Calculations
1st Reading Revised Submittal -City Council 2nd Reading Revised Submittal
Option "A" –City Council
2nd Reading Revised Submittal
Option "B" –City Council
Lot
Ac -Net Roadway
(Access Easement) /
Area above 572
Ac -Net
Roadway
Easement Only
Gross Ac
Ac -Net Roadway
(Access Easement)
/ Area above 572
Ac -Net Roadway
Easement Only Gross Ac
Ac -Net Roadway
(Access Easement) /
Area above 572
Ac -Net Roadway
Easement Only Gross Ac
1 48,651 48,990 50,696 48,286 48,616 50,696 47,016 47,349 50,696
2 50,497 95,692 100,359 50,237 87,763 92,845 50,237 87,763 92,845
3 45,028 55,671 57,862 45,391 58,949 61,023 45,391 58,949 61,023
4 44,282 64,380 67,006 43,621 76,766 82,397 43,621 76,766 82,397
5 49,040 84,198 88,998 43,584 66,925 68,977 43,584 66,925 68,977
6 51,898 51,898 54,524 58,530 58,530 61,355 58,530 58,530 61,355
7 57,753 58,431 70,711 60,526 61,480 72,953 60,526 61,480 72,953
10 (Harbor
Oaks)66,519 66,519 80,255 66,500 66,500 80,255 64,286 64,286 80,255
Average Ac 51,708.50 65,722.38 71,301.38 52,084.38 65,691.13 71,312.63 51,648.88 65,256.00 71,312.63
Total Dev Ac 9.50 12.07 13.09 9.57 12.06 13.10 9.49 11.98 13.10
Average Lot 1.19 1.51 1.64 1.20 1.51 1.64 1.19 1.50 1.64
Total Ac 413,668.00 525,779.00 570,411.00 416,675.00 525,529.00 570,501.00 413,191.00 522,048.00 570,501.00
Du/Ac 0.842 0.663 0.611 0.836 0.663 0.611 0.843 0.668 0.611
Proposed Development Regulations
The Conservation to follow SF-1A,
with the following exceptions:
Changes from 1st Reading Option “B” Only (cul-de-sac 1,008 feet)
Open Space Management Plan
Changes from 1st Reading
Street View Images
Looking SW towards the Housmans Lot Looking N towards the Housmans Lot
Looking SW towards the Housmans Lot
Proposed Master Plan –Option A
Proposed Master Plan –Option B
USACE Exhibit
Yellow line = 572’
Existing Drainage Plan
Option A
Option B
Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan
Option A
Option B
Preliminary Utility Plan
Option A
Option B
Applicant Provided Headlights Exhibit at 1st Reading
Previous Zoning Case –Bella Lago
ZA05-127 & ZA05-128)
(9 Proposed Lots –8 new, 1 existing)
Previous Zoning Case –Lake Forest
ZA07-133 & ZA07-134
(5 Proposed Lots)
ZA08-017 & ZA08-019
(3 Existing Lots)
ZA08-018
(1 Existing Lot)
•October 20, 2020; Approved (6-0)Subject to staff report dated October 13,
2020, and site plan review summary number 3, dated October 13, 2020 ,
–noting that the proposed development is for eight (8) residential lots on approximately
13.1 acres
–that the access easement and street are proposed to be non-gated, open to public traffic,
but privately maintained by the homeowner’s association
–that no streetlights have been presented or will be allowed as part of this approval
–the applicant’s willingness to present a drawing with moving the cul-de-sac to the west so
that lots six (6) and seven (7) could be larger
–also moving that cul-de-sac away from the existing home by the entrance that would be
sided by street on three sides
–the applicant’s willingness to present at second reading slides depicting the bar ditch
versus a curb and gutter option
–noting for second reading the applicant’s willingness to provide an entrance road further
to the north on the Housmans’ lot
–noting the applicant’s willingness for second reading to have the drainage engineer
present to answer questions
City Council 1st Reading Motion
Questions?